the social structure of a tanjore village · serve the village temple. kumbapettai is a fairly...

6
The Social Structure of a Tanjore Village Kathleen Gough T WO types of village structure appear to be present in Tan- jore district. The most prevalent is the mirasi village, where the land is owned in small amounts by a number of separate patrilineal joint-families. This type appa- rently dates in its essential features from the period of the Tamil Chola kings, whose power declined with the Muslim invasions of the early fourteenth century, and ended with the invasion from Vijayanagar in 1534. The other type, the in am village, dates from the Mahratta conquest (1674-1799) when the alien Mahratta kings made grants of whole villages to individual families of Tamil Brahmans and immigrant Mahrattas and to reli- gious institutions. Here, I attempt to outline the social organization of a mirasi village in the northwest of the district, and to indicate what seem, after four months of observa- tion, to be the most important trends of change. Tanjore village people divide the many castes of Hindus into three sub-divisions: —Brahman, non-Brah- man and Adi Dravida ("original Dravidians ", sometimes called Hari- jans, most of whom were once serfs of the soil). The structure of a mirasi village varies according to whether it is a " Brahman" or a " non-Brahman village". In the " Brahman village ", the land is owned by the several families of a Brahman street {agraharam). Some of this land is leased in small amounts on an annual tenure to landless families of one or more non-Brahrnan streets, usually of the " lower" non-Brahman castes of Ahambadiyas, Padayacchis, Konar, Muppanar or Vanniyar. Other land, retained by the landlords (who are called mirasdars), is culti- vated directly by labourers from an Adi Dravida street situated at some distance from the rest of the village. In the " non-Brahman village", the land is owned by joint-families of a street of non-Brahmans, usually of one of the " higher " non-Brahman castes of Vellalar or Kallar. Some land may be then leased to other, "lower caste" non-Brahmam, or more frequently cultivated directly with the aid of Adi Dravida servants' In these villages there is usually only a single Brahman family, of priests who serve the village temple. Kumbapettai is a fairly typical " Brahman village ". One-and-a- half miles square, with a popula- tion of about 1200, it lies on a bus route eight miles from a town. Behind each house in the streets is a small garden of coconuts and vegetables, while round the whole village, for about half a mile, stretch its double-crop paddy fields, watered by the intricate system of irrigation channels from the Kaveri and its tributaries. just off the main road, in the northeast of the village, lies the Brahman street of forty-six houses, ten of which are now empty, their owners having moved to the towns. The tiled-roofed houses adjoin, and the two long rows face each other across the narrow road. Behind the houses, on each side of the street, the gardens lead down to irrigation channels bordering the paddy fields. Two temples stand near the agraharam: that to Siva, in the northeast, and that to Vishnu, in the west. Nearby are a bathing tank, a shrine to Ganapathi near which the Brahmans recite daily jabams after performing their ablutions, and a second shrine built over the tomb of a Brahman sanyasi of the village. The Brah- mans, with their gardens, temples, bathing pool and caste-shrines, thus occupy the northwest corner of the village. A single non-Brah- man house of Kutthadis, a caste whose men formerly performed religious puppet plays and whose women are dancing girls,, stands alone on the northwest boundary of the village. Southwards, across garden and paddy land, lie twenty houses, in two streets, of the non-Brahman Konar caste. The Konar are cow- herds by tradition. Their houses are smaller than the Brahman houses, thatched, and set slightly apart in their gardens. Today, the income (derived from all sour- ces) of Brahman families living entirely in the village, varies from about Rs 80 to about Rs 900 a month. The average Konar house- hold, by contrast, appears to earn one kalam of paddy per adult per month, plus Rs 20 to Rs 60 in cash' thus bringing the value of the total income to between Rs 50 and Rs 100 per month. Adi Dravida families, by contrast again, appear to demand rather more paddy and less cash; the average income of an Adi Dravida household may be estimated very roughly at a value of between Rs 40 and Rs 80 per month. Most Konar families keep one or two cows, and in addition milk the cows and do garden work for Brahmans. Their service was formerly hereditary: the same fami- lies served Brahman families for generations and could not change their allegiance without consent from their original masters. Today, individual Konar men, like Adi Dravidas, sometimes become " at- tached " for a period to a parti- cular Brahman landlord through indebtedness; they borrow money from the landlord and must then work only for him until the debt is repaid. In the old type of ser- vice, in which families of Konar and Adi Dravidas worked by here- ditary right for Brahman families, the servants were called adirnai (serfs). This word is now seldom heard, A few people, both Konar and Adi Dravida, do however still work from choice for their tradi- tional masters, who distinguish be- tween hereditary servants and hired labourers, and feel greater respons- ibility for the former, giving them gifts at marriages and sending food during sickness. Hereditary ser- vants are paid at least partly in paddy, which they prefer. An ordinary hired labourer may be paid daily in the same way, or monthly in cash: he is called a pannaiyal (workman). Konar are also tenants to Brah- man landlords, usually to the men whom they serve. The tenure is called kuthakau An annual rent in paddy is fixed according to the fertility of the soil, and paid in two instalments, after the two harvests in February and October. In a bumper year, the tenant may retain one-third or even half the crop after his rent is paid; in a bad year (like the present one) he may lose all or retain just enough for the next year's seed and cultivation expenses. The landlord may theo- retically demand the whole rent in paddy or its equivalent in cash at the controlled price, whatever the harvest, and a very few do so. Most know their tenants' circum- stances and give small concessions This is the seventh of a series of village studies published in the earlier issues of The Economic Weekly. 531

Upload: others

Post on 26-Mar-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Social Structure of a Tanjore Village · serve the village temple. Kumbapettai is a fairly typical " Brahman village ". One-and-a-half miles square, with a popula tion of about

The Social Structure of a Tanjore Village Kathleen Gough

TW O types o f v i l lage s t ructure appear to be present in T a n ­

jo re dis t r ic t . T h e most prevalent is the mirasi v i l lage , where the l a n d is owned in smal l amounts by a n u m b e r of separate pa t r i l i nea l jo in t - f ami l i e s . T h i s type appa­ren t ly dates in its essential features f r o m the pe r iod o f the T a m i l C h o l a kings, whose power decl ined w i t h the M u s l i m invasions of the early four t een th century, and ended w i t h the invas ion f r o m Vi j ayanaga r i n 1534. T h e other type, the in am vi l lage , dates f r o m the M a h r a t t a conquest (1674-1799) when the a l ien M a h r a t t a kings made grants of whole villages to i n d i v i d u a l famil ies o f T a m i l Brahmans and i m m i g r a n t M a h r a t t a s a n d t o r e l i ­gious ins t i tu t ions . Here , I a t t emp t to ou t l ine the social o rganiza t ion of a mirasi v i l lage in the nor thwest of the d is t r ic t , a n d to ind ica te w h a t seem, after four months of observa­t i o n , to be the most i m p o r t a n t trends of change.

T a n j o r e vi l lage people d iv ide the many castes of H i n d u s in to three sub-divisions: — B r a h m a n , non -Brah ­m a n a n d A d i D r a v i d a ( " o r i g i n a l Drav id ians " , sometimes cal led H a r i -jans, most of w h o m were once serfs of the s o i l ) . T h e s t ructure of a mirasi v i l lage varies accord ing to whe ther it is a " B r a h m a n " or a " n o n - B r a h m a n v i l l a g e " . In the " B r a h m a n vi l lage ", the l a n d is owned by the several families of a B r a h m a n street {agraharam). Some of this l a n d is leased in smal l amounts on an annua l tenure to landless families of one or more non-Brahrnan streets, usually of the " l o w e r " n o n - B r a h m a n castes of Ahambadiyas , Padayacchis, K o n a r , M u p p a n a r o r V a n n i y a r . O t h e r l a n d , re ta ined by the landlords ( w h o are called mirasdars), is c u l t i ­va t ed d i rec t ly by labourers f r o m an A d i D r a v i d a street s i tuated a t some distance f r o m the rest of the v i l lage . I n the " n o n - B r a h m a n v i l l a g e " , the l a n d is o w n e d by jo in t - fami l ies of a street of non-Brahmans , usually of one of the " h igher " n o n - B r a h m a n castes of V e l l a l a r or K a l l a r . Some l a n d m a y be t hen leased to other , " l o w e r cas t e" n o n - B r a h m a m , o r more f requent ly cu l t i va t ed d i rec t ly w i t h the a i d o f A d i D r a v i d a servants' I n these villages there is usual ly only a single B r a h m a n f ami ly , o f priests w h o

serve the v i l lage temple . K u m b a p e t t a i is a f a i r l y typ ica l

" B r a h m a n vi l lage ". One-and-a-h a l f miles square, w i t h a popu la ­t i o n of about 1200, it lies on a bus route eight miles f r o m a t o w n . Beh ind each house in the streets is a smal l garden of coconuts and vegetables, w h i l e r o u n d the whole v i l lage , fo r about h a l f a m i l e , stretch its double-crop paddy fields, watered by the in t r i ca te system of i r r i g a t i o n channels f r o m the K a v e r i a n d its t r ibutar ies .

j u s t of f the m a i n road , i n the northeast of the v i l lage , lies the B r a h m a n street of for ty-six houses, ten of w h i c h are now empty , thei r owners h a v i n g moved to the towns. T h e t i l ed- roofed houses ad jo in , a n d the t w o l o n g rows face each other across the n a r r o w road. Beh ind the houses, on each side of the street, the gardens lead d o w n to i r r i ga t i on channels bo rde r ing the paddy fields. T w o temples s tand near the agraharam: tha t to Siva, in the northeast, a n d tha t to V i s h n u , in the west. Nearby are a b a t h i n g tank , a shrine to G a n a p a t h i near w h i c h the Brahmans recite dai ly jabams after p e r f o r m i n g the i r ablut ions, a n d a second shrine b u i l t over the t o m b of a B r a h m a n sanyasi of the v i l lage . T h e B r a h ­mans, w i t h the i r gardens, temples, ba th ing poo l a n d caste-shrines, thus occupy the nor thwest corner of the vi l lage. A single non -Brah ­m a n house of K u t t h a d i s , a caste whose men fo rmer ly pe r fo rmed religious puppe t plays a n d whose w o m e n are danc ing girls,, stands alone on the nor thwest boundary of the vi l lage .

Southwards , across garden a n d paddy l a n d , l ie twen ty houses, in t w o streets, of the n o n - B r a h m a n K o n a r caste. T h e K o n a r are cow­herds by t r a d i t i o n . T h e i r houses are smaller t h a n the B r a h m a n houses, tha tched , a n d set s l ight ly apar t in the i r gardens. T o d a y , the income (de r ived f r o m a l l sour­ces) of B r a h m a n families l i v i n g ent i re ly in the vi l lage, varies f r o m about Rs 80 to about Rs 900 a m o n t h . T h e average K o n a r house­h o l d , by contrast, appears to earn one kalam of paddy per adu l t per m o n t h , plus Rs 20 to Rs 60 in cash' thus b r i n g i n g the value of the t o t a l income to between Rs 50 a n d Rs 100 per m o n t h . A d i D r a v i d a

families, by contrast again, appear to demand ra ther more paddy a n d less cash; the average income of an A d i D r a v i d a household may be estimated very rough ly at a value of between Rs 40 and Rs 80 per m o n t h . M o s t K o n a r families keep one or t w o cows, and in add i t i on m i l k the cows a n d do garden w o r k for Brahmans. T h e i r service was fo rmer ly hered i ta ry : the same f a m i ­lies served Brahman families fo r generations a n d could not change the i r allegiance w i t h o u t consent f r o m their o r ig ina l masters. T o d a y , i n d i v i d u a l K o n a r men , l ike A d i Dravidas, sometimes become " at­tached " for a pe r iod to a p a r t i ­cular B r a h m a n l a n d l o r d t h r o u g h indebtedness; they bo r row money f r o m the l a n d l o r d and must t hen w o r k on ly for h i m u n t i l the debt is repaid . In the o l d type of ser­vice, i n w h i c h families o f K o n a r and A d i Dravidas worked by here­d i t a ry r igh t for B r a h m a n families, the servants were called adirnai (serfs). T h i s w o r d is now seldom heard, A few people, bo th K o n a r a n d A d i D r a v i d a , d o however s t i l l w o r k f r o m choice for thei r t r a d i ­t iona l masters, w h o dist inguish be­tween heredi tary servants a n d h i r e d labourers, and feel greater respons­i b i l i t y for the former , g i v i n g them gifts at marriages and sending f o o d d u r i n g sickness. He red i t a ry ser­vants are pa id at least p a r t l y in paddy, w h i c h they prefer. A n o rd ina ry h i r ed labourer may be p a i d dai ly in the same way, or m o n t h l y in cash: he is ca l led a pannaiyal ( w o r k m a n ) .

K o n a r are also tenants to B r a h ­m a n landlords, usually to the m e n w h o m they serve. T h e tenure is cal led kuthakau An a n n u a l ren t in paddy is f ixed accord ing to the f e r t i l i t y o f the soil, a n d p a i d in t w o instalments, after the t w o harvests i n February a n d October . I n a bumper year, the t enan t may re ta in one - th i rd or even ha l f the c rop after his rent is p a i d ; in a b a d year ( l i ke the present one) he m a y lose a l l or r e t a in just enough fo r the next year's seed and c u l t i v a t i o n expenses. T h e l a n d l o r d may theo­re t ica l ly d e m a n d the whole rent in paddy or its equivalent in cash at the con t ro l l ed pr ice, whatever t he harvest, a n d a very few do so. M o s t k n o w the i r tenants' c i r c u m ­stances and give small concessions

This is the seventh of a series of village studies published in the earlier issues of The Economic Weekly.

531

Page 2: The Social Structure of a Tanjore Village · serve the village temple. Kumbapettai is a fairly typical " Brahman village ". One-and-a-half miles square, with a popula tion of about

in a b a d harvest. A lways , h o w ­ever, the power of ev ic t ion puts the tenant at his landlord 's mercy. A few fields in K u m b a p e t t a i are g iven on varam tenure. T h e tenant takes a fixed f rac t ion of the c rop , usually one-f i f th , a n d surrenders the rest to the owner . T h o u g h unprof i t ab le , the tenure is a more cer ta in one for the tenant in a b a d year, a n d w i t h the recent succession of poor harvests some tenants have come to prefer i t .

Also in the K o n a r streets l ive the v i l lage servant castes: one fami ly each of barbers, washermen, car­penters and blacksmiths, and three of potters. These a l l i n t e rmar ry a n d in te rd ine only i n the i r o w n castes, and so have l inks w i t h o ther vil lages. Former ly , a l l landlords a n d tenants pa id them twice annua l ly in paddy : today, they are of ten p a i d in cash after each j o b o f w o r k .

These non -Brahman streets are t r a d i t i o n a l i n the v i l lage , bu t t w o other streets of non-Brahmans have g r o w n up in the past f if ty years. T h e y l ive on the eastern boundary of the v i l lage , on a t ract of garden l a n d once granted as inam to a M a h r a t t a servant of the Rajas. T h e M a h r a t t a f ami ly lost its wea l t h d u r i n g Br i t i sh rule and sold the l a n d f i f ty years ago to r i s ing non-Brahman families f rom other v i l ­lages. These now include six houses of Nadar , a " low " non-B r a h m a n caste of toddy- tappers ; five houses of K a l l a r paddy mer­chants ; a poor B r a h m a n f ami ly w h o have set up a " h o t e l " ; a n d single houses of Mahra t t a s , Padayaeehis a n d K o n a r f rom ne ighbour ing v i l ­lages w h o serve Brahmans or ou t ­side landlords for a m o n t h l y wage i n cash. B o t h K a l l a r a n d N a d a r lease some l a n d f r o m the B r a h ­mans, but families of b o t h also now o w n a few acres of the i r o w n , and lease other l and f r o m M u s l i m traders of the nearby t o w n w h o have recently bought l and f r o m e m i g r a t i n g B r a h m a n households. T h e Nadars before p r o h i b i t i o n tap­ped toddy, and s t i l l w o r k as coolies, for a wea l thy t rader of the i r o w n caste some six miles a w a y ; wh i l e the K a l l a r depend m a i n l y for the i r l i v i n g on trans­p o r t i n g the landlords ' paddy to a r i c e - m i l l , three miles away, whence the rice is passed on to the d is t r ic t supply office. These t w o streets of newcomers, on ly pa r t l y in tegra ted in the vi l lage economy, w i l l be .seen to be i m p o r t a n t w h e n we consider trends of change in K u m b a p e t t a i .

F i n a l l y , h a l f a m i l e south across paddy f ie lds , lies a large A d i D r a ­v i d a , street of about e ighty houses. These are the Pallas, a caste of adimai (serfs) w h o were fo rmer ly " o w n e d " by the landlords . T o d a y , they too lease kuthakai lands a n d w o r k in the paddy fields for a da i ly wage, in some cases for the i r t r a d i t i o n a l masters. U n l i k e the K o n a r , they were t r a d i t i o n a l l y p r o h i b i t e d f r o m en te r ing the B r a h ­m a n street, and none do so today. Conversely, Brahmans may not enter the A d i D r a v i d a street; to do so w o u l d , i t is believed, b r i n g mis­fo r tune on its inhabi tants , Also in the south is a small street of Para-yas, the " lowest " A d i D r a v i d a caste whose t r a d i t i o n a l w o r k is to remove a n d sell the carcases of dead animals a n d to w a t c h over the c remat ion grounds a t n igh t . Parayas, l ike Pallas, w o r k for day wages in the fields, t hough , un l i ke Pallas, they are not " a t tached " to pa r t i cu l a r families of Brahmans.

H a v i n g o u t l i n e d the caste groups, we may see where lie the most fundamen ta l unities a n d cleavages w i t h i n the vi l lage struct ive. M o s t s t r i k ing in a T a n j o r e vi l lage is the u n i t y of the i n d i v i d u a l caste g r o u p : this was usually, u n t i l recently, the u n i t y of a single street. T h e m e m ­bers of a caste w i t h i n one vi l lage are first u n i t e d by s imi l a r i ty of occupa t ion , of r ights in the l a n d , o f income, a n d of r i t u a l beliefs a n d practices. Fo rmer ly , a l l the B r a h ­mans were mirasdars, a l l the K o n a r kuthakai tenants, and a l l the A d i Dravidas , landless labourers. T h e non-Brahmans are set off f r o m the Brahmans by numerous differences of custom, chief of w h i c h are t h a t Brahmans, un l ike most n o n - B r a h ­mans, eschew meat , fish a n d eggs, a n d do not pe r fo rm an ima l sacri­fices in temples. We have already men t ioned the Brahman ica l t em­ples; these, n o w off icial ly open to a l l castes, are s t i l l almost exc lu­sively used by Brahmans , t h o u g h non-Brahmans ( b u t no t A d i D r a -vidas) occsionally enter the outer cour t at a festival of the Sanskritic deities. T h e K o n a r have thei r o w n vi l lage goddess (grama devata) housed in a shrine between the K o n a r streets. H e r name means " K o n a r mothe r o f the v i l l a g e " ; she is outside the B r a h m a n i c a l pan theon of deities; a n d she is p r o p i t i a t e d dai ly by a n o n - B r a h m a n priest a n d annual ly , w i t h sacrifices, at a festival pecul iar to K o n a r . T h e Pallas, s imi la r ly , have a shrine to the goddess K a l i a m m a n w h i c h stands at the end of the i r street.

O n l y they m a y worsh ip her, a n d she has a separate priest a n d annua l festival .

O t h e r r i t u a l symbols a n d i n s t i t u ­t ions emphasize the u n i t y of the caste. Brahmans possess a single c remat ion g r o u n d ; K o n a r n o w share theirs w i t h the o ther i n c o m i n g non -B r a h m a n castes; and b o t h Pallas a n d Parayas have the i r separate b u r i a l grounds. B a t h i n g pools, again, are d i s t r ibu ted between the three ma jo r groups of castes. Bir ths , marriages, deaths, a n d p r o p i ­t iat ions of ancestral spirits, asso­ciated as they are w i t h the i n t i ­macy of f a m i l y l i fe , are intra-caste events. T h i s is of course in har­m o n y w i t h caste endogamy a n d w i t h the fact t ha t ( w i t h the excep­t i on of the servant castes w h o m a r r y between villages) each caste street f o rmed u n t i l recently a g r o u p o f i n t e r m a r r y i n g k i n . I n the B r a h ­m a n street, caste u n i t y is even more apparent t h a n a m o n g non -Brah ­mans. Houses ad jo in , a n d there are even holes in the d i v i d i n g wal ls t h r o u g h w h i c h w o m e n m a y pass messages to each other.

Caste un i ty , a n d the a u t h o r i t a r i a n role of the landlords , appears again i n v i l lage admin i s t r a t ion . T h e v i l ­lage forms a local revenue u n i t under a v i l lage headman appo in ted by government . T h e headman must collect the revenue f r o m mirasdars, a n d has the r i g h t to t ry smal l c i v i l cases w i t h i n the v i l lage . He is assisted by a clerk, a n d com­mands the services of t w o revenue collectors a n d a peon. T h e o r e t i ­cal ly , these officials may be of any caste; ac tual ly , of course, the head­m a n a n d clerk are Brahmans a n d the three servants, non-Brahmans . In a d d i t i o n , the vi l lage forms a panchayat under an elected pancha-yat board w i t h a president a n d seven members. T h e b o a r d c o n t r o l a h i n d derived f r o m a smal l por­t i o n of the vi l lage revenue; the i r chief w o r k is to m a i n t a i n roads a n d wells. As m i g h t be expected,, a l l are Brahmans, since Brahmans o w n the l a n d o f the vi l lage. T h e re la t ive ly m o d e r n ins t i tu t ions o f v i l lage headman a n d panchayat board have, in fact, been we lded i n to a m u c h older f o r m of a d m i ­n is t ra t ion w h i c h is s t i l l of great impor tance . W i t h the except ion of the Brahmans, each caste street annua l ly elects t w o headman (nattanmakkar or talaivar) w h o are responsible for m a i n t a i n i n g order in the street. A n y offence such as thef t , adul tery , assault, cr encroachment on another 's l a n d , demands the a t t en t ion of the head-

532

May 24, 1952 THE ECONOMIC WEEKLY

Page 3: The Social Structure of a Tanjore Village · serve the village temple. Kumbapettai is a fairly typical " Brahman village ". One-and-a-half miles square, with a popula tion of about

533

Page 4: The Social Structure of a Tanjore Village · serve the village temple. Kumbapettai is a fairly typical " Brahman village ". One-and-a-half miles square, with a popula tion of about

m e n , w h o h a u l the c u l p r i t before an assembly of men of the street. Pallas h o l d their meetings before the K a l i a m m a n shr ine; K o n a r , i n the ya rd of the vi l lage goddess temple . I f the offence is sl ight , the headmen m a y pronounce jus­tice, themselves admin i s te r ing a fine or a pub l i c w h i p p i n g . In a more serious dispute, the B r a h m a n l and­lords of the culpr i t s must be cal led to ra t i fy the headmen's conclusions a n d themselves execute j u d g m e n t . In pa r t i cu la r , any dispute affect ing the r epu ta t ion or the general peace of the vi l lage requires B r a h m a n in t e rven t ion . In a recent case, a Palla stole a brass vessel f r o m the n o n - B r a h m a n street of a neighbour­i n g vi l lage . H a v i n g caught h i m , the owner sent h i m . bound and escorted by two Pallas of the offended vi l lage, back to his o w n l a n d l o r d for justice. T h e B r a h m a n l a n d l o r d of ou r Palla cal led a meet ing of the thief's caste fellows in the ya rd of the vi l lage goddess temple . There he e l ic i ted the facts of the case, exacted a fine of Rs 10, adminis tered a w h i p p i n g , a n d obl iged the cu lp r i t to d r i n k a pot o f c o w d u n g m i x e d w i t h water , " to humble h i m " , as he said. T h e who le caste g roup re t i red , satisfied that justice h a d been done. T h e Brahmans themselves have no headmen, a n d rely less on a rb i t r a ­tors to settle the i r pr iva te disputes. T h i s i s in keeping w i t h their posi­t i o n o f a u t h o r i t y in the v i l lage a n d w i t h the fact t ha t i n general, B r a h -mans a d m i t no superiors a n d pay less f o r m a l respect to the i r elders w i t h i n the caste. I t i s d i f f icul t to say h o w B r a h m a n disputes are settled. A few go now to the urban courts ; many d rag on tor months , kept in check by the need t o m a i n t a i n B r a h m a n u n i t y and au thor i ty before the lower castes, u n t i l a t last the r i t u a l obligat ions of k inship force the opponents to co-operate.

In a T a n j o r e v i l lage , the u n i t y of the. caste street overrides the i n d i v i d u a l i t y o f the dwe l l i ng -g roup , thus contrast ing w i t h the s i tuat ion in a M a l a b a r v i l lage . T h e r e , as Dr M i l l e r has described, the l a n d of a whole vil lage may be owned by a single l a n d l o r d f ami ly , of ten o f the N a m b u d i r i B r a h m a n sub-caste. A m o n g the Naya r l a n d ­holders of the v i l lage , each large m a t r i l i n e a l d w e l l i n g g roup stands supreme in its ancestral garden, shut in by walls or hedges a n d w i t h its o w n c remat ion g r o u n d , ancestor shrine, snake-grove, a n d of ten, goddess temple . I n T a n j o r e ,

despite the ownersh ip o f l a n d by p a t r i l i n e a l jo in t - fami l i es , the d w e l l ­ing-group has no such i n d i v i d u a l s t rength. K i n s h i p ties, instead of be ing strongly un i l i nea l , as in M a l a b a r , r ami fy wide ly i n b o t h pa te rna l a n d ma te rna l l ines; the j o i n t f a m i l y divides every genera­t i o n ; and the local g r o u p of agna­t ic k i n [koottam—comparable to the Naya r m a t r i l i n e a l taravad) — lacks corporate u n i t y a n d is b o u n d on ly by the observance of death p o l l u t i o n . Houses and ancestral l a n d are readi ly bough t a n d sold. T h e his tory o f l and r ights i n T a n ­jo re villages is relevant to this con­trast. Fo r u n t i l 1865, the l a n d in mirasi villages was no t o w n e d by pa t r i l i nea l jo in t - fami l ies a t a l l , b u t he ld in c o m m o n by the whole caste g roup of mirasdars of the v i l ­lage, w h o per iodica l ly appor t ioned shares by m u t u a l consent for the maintenance of the i r separate f a m i ­lies. I n K u m b a p e t t a i , this i n s t i t u ­t i on persists in the " c o m m o n lands " and " c o m m o n money " of the Brahmans. T h e i r c remat ion g r o u n d , cer ta in threshing grounds, a stretch of garden l a n d , and the fishing r ights in the i r b a t h i n g p o o l a l l f a l l under this category, the income der ived f r o m these c o m m o n possessions be ing devoted to the temple funds. I n short , the H i n d u j o i n t - f a m i l y organiza t ion appears to be at its weakest in T a n j o r e , a n d a t its strongest, in M a l a b a r , the reverse being t rue of the u n i t y of the local caste g roup . T h e t w o areas p robab ly represent the ex­tremes of v a r i a t i o n w i t h i n a basic­a l ly c o m m o n South I n d i a n pa t t e rn .

As in a l l I n d i a n villages, h o w ­ever, a u n i t y of the who le v i l lage overrides the separateness of each caste. T h e basis of this u n i t y is the economic interdependence of landlords , tenants, labourers a n d vi l lage servants, and its perpetua­t i o n , in my v i ew, depends on the maintenance of these economic arrangements. I n everyday l i f e , this u n i t y of the vi l lage is h i d d e n beneath the separate economic, social and r i t u a l activit ies of each caste and each d w e l l i n g - g r o u p ; i t is sometimes t empora r i l y rent by quarrels between ind iv idua l s or be­tween kin-groups. Per iodical ly , however, some event, ceremonial or haphazard , occurs a t w h i c h the u n i t y of the vi l lage is af f i rmed. Such events always relate to the welfare of the v i l lage as a whole ra ther t h a n of any single p a r t of i t . Conce rn for the welfare of the v i l lage is expressed in the i n s t i t u ­t i o n of the grama devata or v i l lage

dei ty . T h i s de i ty is always pr i -rnar i ly a possession of the n o n -Brahmans o f the v i l l a g e : i n K u m b a p e t t a i , the goddess is herself a K o n a r w o m a n w h o d i ed o f sma l l -pox , a n d the temple priest is a n o n - B r a h m a n . B u t besides be ing a dei ty o f the K o n a r , p rop i t i a t ed by t h e m a t the i r o w n annua l fest ival , the goddess commands the al le­giance o f b o t h Brahmans a n d A d i Dravidas at specific times of the year. H e r shrine stands on a boundary of the v i l lage a n d her i d o l is believed to protect the who le c o m m u n i t y f r o m crop-fa i lure , infec­tious diseases, female barrenness and deaths in c h i l d - b i r t h . House­holds of a l l castes p rop i t i a t e her, in terms o f the i r pa r t i cu la r r i t u a l idioms, in cases of insani ty, bar ren­ness or disease. By far the chief event in the v i l lage calendar is the larger, f i f teen day festival to the goddess celebrated by the who le vi l lage in the summer season. At this festival, the image of the dei ty is n i g h t l y taken in procession t h r o u g h o u t the streets of the v i l lage a n d p r o p i t i a t e d i n every street i n a manner pecul iar to the caste. As in a l l parts o f South I n d i a , the vi l lage temple festival dramatizes the separateness and also the in ter­dependence between castes a n d the need for the i r co-operat ion. Of recent years, since newcomers of diverse n o n - B r a h m a n castes came to K u m b a p e t t a i , there have been disputes concern ing precedence in the rites. These once settled, the r ank of a pa r t i cu l a r f a m i l y in the t o t a l v i l lage s tructure becomes p u b ' l ie ly accepted.

O t h e r events a n d festivals un i t e the vi l lage as a whole . Ch ie f of these are Pongal , the a n n u a l festi­v a l fo r the harvest of the second c rop in January , a n d the day o f the f i r s t ceremonia l p l o u g h i n g , a t the start o f the T a m i l N e w Year . I t i s in teres t ing to note t ha t f igh ts between ne ighbour ing villages of ten take place on one or another of these festival days, thus fu r the r r e in fo rc ing the u n i t y o f the v i l lage as a whole . Spectators f r o m ne igh­b o u r i n g villages, c o m i n g to w a t c h the f u n after the i r o w n celebrations are over, or i f t he i r , o w n take place on another day, have several times recently f a l l en f o u l o f K u m a b a -pe t ta i non-Brahmans and A d i D r a ­vidas, so t ha t a p i t ched bat t le w i t h stones a n d staffs resulted. T h e ab i ­l i t y to mass forces against in terfer­i n g outsiders is a measure of the u n i t y a n d self-sufficiency o f the v i l ­lage. So, too , is the degree to w h i c h c r ime a n d scandal are kep t

584

May 24, 1952 T H E E C O N O M I C W E E K L Y

Page 5: The Social Structure of a Tanjore Village · serve the village temple. Kumbapettai is a fairly typical " Brahman village ". One-and-a-half miles square, with a popula tion of about

w i t h i n the confines o f the v i l lage . U n t i l recently, the pol ice h a d l i t t l e p a r t t o p lay i n K u m b a p e t t a i , for the vi l lage was u n i t e d against ou t ­side legal interference. T w o m u r ­ders a n d three suicides have, in the past fifteen years, been disposed of a n d hushed up by v i l l age a u t h o r i ­ties, the police be ing qu ie t ly b r i bed a n d sent about the i r business.

T h e s tab i l i ty o f the t r a d i t i o n a l v i l lage organiza t ion may be seen as a ba lanc ing ou t of var ious unit ies a n d antagonisms w h i c h cut across each other . We have men t ioned the u n i t y a n d separateness of the local caste g roup , a n d this, no doubt , has always been accompanied by a ce r ta in antagonism between the three m a j o r groups of castes— an antagonism always engendered by differences of w e a l t h , of custom, a n d of interests in the economic: resources. B u t this antagonism c o u l d no t , t r a d i t i o n a l l y , break ou t i n t o a quar re l between t w o whole groups of castes. N o n - B r a h m a n s c o u l d no t , for example , rise up as a body a n d combat the i r B r a h m a n landlords . T h e r e are several rea­sons for this, the chief be ing the lack of economic corporateness of each caste group . K o n a r a n d A d i Drav idas were employed not as whole castes, by a l l the Brahmans col lect ively, b u t in separate f a m i ­lies, by i n d i v i d u a l families of l a n d ­lords. T h e system of tenure, a n d the landlord ' s t r ad i t i ona l l y recog­nized power of ev ic t ion , keeps the separate families of non-Brahmans compe t ing amongst each other for l a n d a n d for employment . Perhaps a more i m p o r t a n t factor was the sanction given to the t r a d i t i o n a l r ights between castes by r i t u a l beliefs a n d by m o r a l max ims acceptable to the society as a who le . It is these beliefs, together w i t h the i r con t inued economic dependence on the Brahmans , w h i c h even today prevent A d i Drav idas f r o m ente r ing the B r a h m a n street a n d temples, lest the dei ty should take ven­geance on t h e m in the f o r m of disease or death .

As l o n g as the system remained stable, therefore, it seems as t h o u g h , in spite of covert antagonism be­tween people of different castes, t h a t is between the members of groups of di f ferent order in the society, open quarrels demand ing u n i t e d ac t ion on the p a r t o f the g roup c o u l d take place on ly be­tween groups of the same o rde r— fo r example between branches of the same j o i n t - f a m i l y , jo in t - fami l ies of the same casteTgroup, between a l l non-Brahmans o r a l l A d i D r a ­

vidas of adjacent villages. Such quarrels are s t i l l c o m m o n , a n d cut across, and therefore weaken, the cleavages between castes i n the v i l ­lage. Even today, indeed, w h e n the system is far f r o m stable a n d antagonisms between castes have deepened, i t is possible to f ind t w o B r a h m a n landlords dragged i n to opposite sides of a quar re l w h i c h began between the i r A d i D r a v i d a servants. So strong, s t i l l , are the t r a d i t i o n a l feudal obligat ions and loyalties between i n d i v i d u a l f a m i ­lies of different castes.

T o d a y , however , the v i l lage s t ructure presents no longer a nice balance of uni t ies a n d antagonisms between caste a n d k insh ip groups in a self-sufficient l i t t l e republ ic . F o r obviously, the economic basis of the system has been fundamen ta l ly upset w i t h i n the last f i f ty to seventy years. I t is impossible to enumerate a l l the ways in w h i c h this has happened, bu t we may m e n t i o n a few. M o s t i m p o r t a n t i n K u m b a -pet ta i is the depar ture to u rban w o r k of a large n u m b e r of Brah ­m a n families and ind iv idua l s . A few of these have sold the i r lands to middle-class t r a d i n g families of the nearby t o w n ; the m a j o r i t y leave their empty houses locked a n d r e t u r n after each harvest to collect the i r rents, now in cash. M a n y of these m e n w i l l r e t u r n to K u m b a ­pet ta i on re t i rement f rom a govern­men t post; some, after more t han h a l f a l i fe t ime away in the towns of South I n d i a , have already done so. One result is tha t the number of competent young or middle-aged B r a h m a n m e n left to manage; the affairs of K u m b a p e t t a i is very few, w h i l e those w h o do remain t end to feel in fe r io r a n d swamped by the i r more adventurous k insmen. Relat ions between absentee l a n d ­l o r d a n d tenant are unsatisfactory. O f t e n , the l a n d l o r d barely knows his tenants by name a n d knows n o t h i n g about the i r circumstances or the business of c u l t i v a t i o n . O f t e n his only interest in the v i l ­lage is to take away money f r o m it twice annua l l y ; a few landlords o f K u m b a p e t t a i do no t k n o w the site a n d acreage of the i r lands. A m o n g bo th A d i Drav idas a n d the poorer K o n a r tenants i t is begin­n i n g to be said in secret tha t such owners have no r i g h t to the i r lands; since, as Brahmans, they no longer spend the i r lives in p r a y i n g for the c o m m u n i t y a n d adminis ter­i n g its affairs, they should no longer share its income. To this the Brahmans reply tha t w i t h o u t u r b a n w o r k they can no longer

m a i n t a i n the i r s tandard o f l i v i n g ; a n d this, consider ing the increase in p o p u l a t i o n and the smal l size of holdings , is indeed usually t rue . T h e bad harvests of the last few years have of course exacerbated the opposi t ion between l a n d l o r d a n d tenant . O n e temporary solu­t ion w o u l d seem to l ie in f ixi ty of tenure and the f ixing of fairer rents; b u t there is no doubt tha t absentee l and lo rd i sm and the tend­ency (less in K u m b a p e t t a i t han in some other villages) towards the amassing of large estates by a few l a n d l o r d families, must soon be checked by more drastic remedies.

A stronger b low has been dealt at: the K u m b a p e t t a i social system by the in f lux , in the last fifty years, of the t w o new streets of mixed n o n - B r a h m a n castes. These, o w i n g no t r ad i t i ona l allegiance to the Brahmans , t end to resent the i r au tho r i ty a n d to set up an adminis­t r a t i o n of their o w n . In one street, the N a d a r have founded a shrine to a local non-Brahman sanyasi, and recently assemblies of the t w o new streets, and sometimes also of the K o n a r , have met to settle thei r disputes before this shrine rather than before the vi l lage goddess temple , and have decl ined to call in Brahmans to ra t i fy their judg­ments. T h e s tandard of l i v i n g of the families in these two streets, pa r t l y employed as they are in trade and by landlords f r o m out­side1 the vi l lage, tends to be higher t han tha t of other non-Brahmans and allows t hem to dictate terms to the local landlords. T h e K a l l a r paddy merchant 's f ami ly , in p a r t i ­cular , have become power fu l non-B r a h m a n leaders: though h a n d - i n -glove w i t h the landlords in the sale of black-market rice, this ris­i ng middle-class fami ly refuse to observe a l l the o ld rules of r i t u a l p o l l u t i o n w i t h their employers; one of thei r sons, together w i t h t w o other non-Brahman hoys of i n c o m ­i n g families, attends h i g h school w i t h the B r a h m a n youths.

I t i s i m p o r t a n t to not ice tha t the people w h o oppose the t r a d i ­t iona l vi l lage system are not those w h o suffer most acutely under i t , bu t those w h o have p a r t l y e x t r i ­cated themselves f r o m i t t h r o u g h some change in the i r economic c i r ­cumstances. I t is no t , for example, the very poor K o n a r tenants in K u m b a p e t t a i w h o support the a n t i - B r a h m a n D r a v i d a K a z a k a m movement , bu t rather the some­w h a t weal th ie r and more independ­ent " upstarts " of the t w o new streets, a n d to a m u c h larger

THE ECONOMIC WEEKLY May 24, 1952

535

Page 6: The Social Structure of a Tanjore Village · serve the village temple. Kumbapettai is a fairly typical " Brahman village ". One-and-a-half miles square, with a popula tion of about

extent, the new, independent non-Brahman landlords of ne ighbour ing villages, w h o resent the or thodox Brahman's unwillingness to treat' t hem as his r i t u a l equals. C o m ­munis t supporters, again, appear to be stronger among landless, h igh school-educated youths of any caste a n d among A d i Dravidas w h o had t empora r i ly left their natal vi l lage, t r i ed many jobs and come home to f i nd the status quo too conservative for them, than among regular labourers s t i l l at tached to their t r ad i t iona l masters. There is no doubt , moreover, that the t r a d i ­t iona l forms of " caste dis t inct ion " against w h i c h official propaganda is so m u c h directed w i l l disappear f r o m the vi l lage only when the o ld economic arrangements wh ich a l low of h igh caste au thor i ta r ian ism have been more thoroughly undermined . In K u m b a p e t t a i , the gradual d r i f t to the cities of an educated aristo­cracy, the transfer of l and to middle-class t r ad ing families of the towns, and the in f i l t r a t ion of a smal l , autonomous working-class g roup supported by u rban forms of labour, have begun this process, and i t may be expected to cont inue u n t i l the vil lage has lost its t r ad i ­t i ona l in tegrat ion and become l i t t l e more than a un i t of neighbour­hood.

THE ECONOMIC WEEKLY

Orissa Finances S. Misra

OR I S S A was formed in to a separate province in 1936,

a year before the i n t roduc t i on of p rov inc ia l au tonomy. T h e t e r r i ­tories cons t i tu t ing the province were carved out of the provinces of Bihar and Orissa, Madras and the Cen­t ra l Provinces. As distant corners and ta i l ends of the provinces con­cerned, these areas h a d long been neglected and their adminis t ra t ive development starved. T h e newly created province came in to exist­ence as a par t icu la r ly undeveloped adminis t ra t ive un i t . Bihar and Orissa was the poorest province in I n d i a , where the scale of publ ic expenditure was the lowest. On account of its poverty, this province was exempted, under the Mes ton settlement, f rom m a k i n g any con­t r i b u t i o n to the central revenue. Of this poor province, the Orissa po r t ion was m u c h the poorer a n d less developed. It was essential to appreciate the posi t ion in order to determine the t reatment to be ac­corded to Orissa. G iven the op­por tun i ty of shaping her o w n des­t iny , Orissa was faced w i t h the enormous task of m a k i n g up the leeway. H e r poverty and undeve­loped economy elici ted sympathy f rom t ime to t i m e ; but she d i d not receive the requisite assistance necessary for her development.

Fo r apprecia t ing the f inancial posi t ion of Orissa, it is necessary to appraise h o w she fared w i t h the Nierneyer A w a r d . Sir O t t o N i e -rneyer was appoin ted to conduct an enquiry w i t h regard to any special assistance needed by any province and the t ime and manner of dis­t r i bu t i ng the p rov inc ia l share of i n ­come-tax. I t had been recognised that at the inaugura t ion of p r o v i n ­cial autonomy, each of the provinces was to be so equipped as to enjoy a reasonable prospect of m a i n t a i n ­ing financial e q u i l i b r i u m . I t was par t i cu la r ly i m p o r t a n t to b r ing to an end the chronic state of deficits in to w h i c h some of them h a d fallen. T h e Niemeyer A w a r d was determined on the basis of these short per iod considerations of ba l ­ancing the budgets more or less on the levels existing at the t ime.

U n d e r the Niemeyer A w a r d , 62½ per cent of the ju te export duties was assigned to the provinces. T h i s was in tended to provide a

special assistance to Bengal on ac­count of her f inancial difficulties. Assam, Bihar a n d Orissa received small shares as m i n o r j u t e -g rowing provinces. Orissa's share amounted to about 2 lakhs of rupees in the first year of au tonomy; bu t there­after t i l l the end of war , i t seldom reached even one l a k h a year. There was no doubt considerable, increase after the war ; bu t the amount was so small that it had scarcely any significance in Orissa's finance.

T h e d i s t r ibu t ion of 50 per cent of the proceeds of income-tax among the provinces was of outs tanding importance in the Niemeyer A w a r d . T h e d i s t r ibu t ion was determined on the basis of residence and p o p u ­la t ion , and of the provinc ia l share, 2 per cent was assigned to Orissa on this basis. Before the war , the amount d is t r ibuted was exceedingly small and Orissa's share d i d not exceed 3 lakhs of rupees. Bu t o w i n g to the war - t ime expansion of income-tax revenue, the p rov inc i a l share rose to 29 crores and Orissa received 58 lakhs in the last year of the war.

Of fundamental impor tance to Orissa was the annua l subvention of 40 lakhs gran ted to her under the A w a r d . Niemeyer was impress­ed w i t h the c ry ing needs of Orissa. I t was impossible to ignore the fact, he remarked, that the existing standard of expendi ture in Orissa was exceedingly low. Bu t in re­commend ing the subvention he d i d not take a l l the relevant factors i n t o consideration. I t i s indeed u n ­for tunate that w h e n f inancial settle­ments were made, policies were re­vised in the l igh t of experience and circumstances, b u t the basis of these settlements was never chang­ed. In 1935, before the creation of the province of Orissa, budgets for Orissa were f ramed in parts in the three provinces of Bihar and Orissa, Madras and C.P. a n d - t h e deficit was estimated to be 40 lakhs. Th i s was clone at a t ime when the centra l and the p rov inc ia l govern­ments were ca r ry ing out re t rench­ment and r u l i n g out a l l schemes of new expenditure. T h e three p ro ­vinces concerned h a d no interest in the new province to be created a n d the f inancial posi t ion was no t given proper consideration. Above a l l , the province h a d yet to come i n t o

536

May 24, 1952