the safe working practice of changing out a raisebore reaming head underground eloise copper mine

16
The Safe Working The Safe Working Practice of Changing Practice of Changing Out a Raisebore Out a Raisebore Reaming Head Reaming Head Underground Underground Eloise Copper Mine

Upload: preston-jackson

Post on 18-Dec-2015

221 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

The Safe Working Practice of The Safe Working Practice of Changing Out a Raisebore Changing Out a Raisebore Reaming Head UndergroundReaming Head Underground

Eloise Copper Mine

Overview of OperationOverview of Operation

Eloise Mine Site. Underground Operation – mining ~

500,000t/annum – 70,000t/annum Cu Con. Currently 570m underground. Main Orebodies – Levuka and Elrose. Levuka South – offset by main faulting structure. Necessary to install new ventilation shaft to

supply adequate ventilation to this area.

Overview of Ventilation ShaftOverview of Ventilation Shaft

Ventilation shaft established through collaboration of the following contractors.– Major Pontil.– Raisebore Australia.– Townsville engineering.– Jetcrete.– EROC (formally Peabody mining services).– Piling contractors.– Nortask.– Australian mining consultants (AMC).– Hard rock electrical.– Supervision and design Amalg resources.

Development of Ventilation ShaftDevelopment of Ventilation Shaft Begun 20th July Major Pontil – 482.5m directional hole accurate within

0.35m Hole reamed to accommodate RBA drill string RBA back reamed 3.5m diameter shaft up to the

cretaceous sediments (overburden) Lower rods – will expand upon this step Changed to 660mm diameter head – reamed to

surface Piling contractors and Jetcrete worked together to

bore and line the remaining 57m to a diameter of 3.0m Installation of the southern ventilation fan As a note increased the quanity of air from 82m3/s to

197m3/s Completed 22nd December

The PROBLEMThe PROBLEM

Risk assessment conducted on all identifiable sections of the project.

Significant risk associated with the servicing of the raisebore cutter head.

Needed to completely isolate the area around the bottom of the reamed shaft – Identified 3m as being a safe working distance after risk assessment conducted.

The SOLUTIONThe SOLUTION

Planned for at least one change out.

Decision between AMALG Res. and RBA was to design and fabricate an extended pair of breakout spanners.

Drawings were completed sent to AMALG’s Mechanical engineer to perform strength of material calculation’s.

These were then sent to Townsville Engineering for fabrication.

Super SpannerSuper Spanner

SPECIFICATIONSSPECIFICATIONS

Spanners constructed of:– Bisalloy 80– 50mm thick– Built up around jaws of spanner– Top spanner 3.85m– Bottom spanner 4.1m

– Arguably the biggest spanners in North Queensland

Close up of top spannerClose up of top spanner

The CONCEPTThe CONCEPT

Top spanner wraps around stabilizing rod inside ribs. Bottom spanner sits below it and offset from it. Portapower ram links the two spanners via a rod. Ram extended forcing spanners together. Force supplied sufficient to overcome the torque applied

when initially tensioning rods. Joint between stem rod and stabilizer loosened.

Simply rotate drill string anti clockwise to remove reaming head.

Result – removal of reaming head without personnel being exposed to shaft brow.

TheThe PROCESSPROCESS

Operators briefed and JSA agreed upon and signed off.

Establish communications between surface drill rig operator and underground operators.

Lower rods to floor. Forklift hooks up conventional spanner. Rotate rods so spanner on right hand side of drive. Forklift hooks up second wrap around spanner. Link two spanners with rod and portapower ram. Apply pressure to portapower to loosen raisebore head

from stabilizer rod. Spanners removed. Stem rod and reaming head removed. Raisebore head dragged out with loader. Connect 660mm raisebore head.

PHOTO 1PHOTO 1

PHOTO 2PHOTO 2

PHOTO 3PHOTO 3

The COST ALTERNATIVESThe COST ALTERNATIVES

*Note The spanners were available at the completion of the project. Sold to RBA at cost

Alternative 1 Alternative 2

Spanners $11,124 -

Delay Rates ($350/hr) $875 $42,000

Replacement Stabilizer Rod - $15,000

Time to Complete (hrs) 2.5 120

Total Cost $11,999 $57,000

The RESULTThe RESULT

Alternative 1 was chosen Completed ahead of time and under budget

Safe, economical and timely solution to a common problem

The result proved that INNOVATIONS such as this can be implemented if a little thought goes into the initial design stages