the role of the oil and gas sector in decarbonisation/media/shared/documents/events/2019… · a...

18
The role of the oil and gas sector in decarbonisation Philip Ringrose Equinor & NTNU - Trondheim, Norway Bryan Lovell Meeting – January 2019 Role of geological science in decarbonisation

Upload: others

Post on 04-Feb-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • The role of the oil and gas sector in decarbonisationPhilip Ringrose

    Equinor & NTNU - Trondheim, Norway

    Bryan Lovell Meeting – January 2019Role of geological science in decarbonisation

  • Open

    Upper Paleolithic depiction of aurochs, horses and deer, Lascaux Caves, Dordogne France

    Lascaux Cave paintingsCollapse of human civilization?

    2 |

  • Open

    Age of sustainability … ?

    Decarbonisation trajectories:

    (1) reduction already achieved

    (2) potentially underway

    (3) still to be achieved

    Can human society decarbonise rapidly enough?

    0

    2000

    4000

    6000

    8000

    10000

    12000

    14000

    16000

    1800 1850 1900 1950 2000 2050 2100

    Mill

    ion

    met

    ric

    tonn

    es o

    f car

    bon

    Year

    1

    2

    3

    Industrial age

    Ringrose (2017) – Sustainability and Physics

    3 |

  • Open

    Societal needs

    Industrial challenge

    What will the future of energy look like?

    A modified oil and gas energy sector is most likely to deliver this:

    1. Large and long-term investment projects needed

    2. CO2 management and disposal at industrial scales

    3. Subsurface resource management skills and tools

    4 |

    Human society needs a massive shift:

    • Rapid growth in RE

    • Dramatic improvements in energy efficiency

    • Rapid decarbonisation of energy, industry and food supply

    But this will need:

    • Public-private partnerships

    • Societal and political engagement in the solution

    Yappy dog

  • Open

    What does large-scale CCS look like?

    • 150km seabed CO2 transport pipeline from LNG plant

    • Saline aquifers c. 2.5km deep adjacent to gas field

    • CO2 stored initially in the Tubåen Fm. (2008-2011) and then in the Stø Fm. (2011-)

    Gas

    CO2

    LNG plant (Melkøya)

    Snøhvit Project: First onshore capture - offshore storage project

    5 |

  • Open

    Monitoring the subsurface at Snøhvit

    6 |

    Down-hole data:Downhole flow log Down-hole pressure data

    Time-lapse seismic(Amplitude difference)

    Fluvio-delta ic reservoir Sha llow ma rine

    • Rising pressure due to geological barriers led to well intervention • Integrated use of geophysical monitoring and down-hole gauges• Deployed back-up option in the injector well

    Successful well intervention guided by monitoring data

    Hansen et al. 2013; Pawar et al., 2015

    Demonstrates value of flexible well design

  • Open

    The Norwegian CCS Demonstration project

    Norcem Cement Factory, Brevik

    EGE Energy Recycling plant, Oslo

    OSLO

    Storage sites

    • Project currently in the planning stage• CO2 storage partnership comprises

    Equinor, Shell and Total

    Development solution is subsea wellhead connected via pipeline to an onshore intermediate storage port

    7 |

  • Open

    Norwegian CO2 Storage: Future potential

    Allows stepwise development of CCS from more regional hubs

    Reduces risk and threshold for othersEnables additional CO2 storage

    8

    Basis for emerging CO2 value chains:• Natural gas to hydrogen • CO2 EOR

    Norway CO2 storage hub: Possible catalyst for roll-out of CCS in Europe?

    8 |

  • Open

    Norway CO2 storage in numbers

    How much is 1Mt of CO2?

    • Annual emissions from 330,000 cars (assuming 200g/km)

    • 5 million passenger air kilometres

    • 100 million tonnes/km of maritime shipping

    • One tenth of Norwegian road traffic emissions in 2014

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    45

    50

    1995

    1996

    1997

    1998

    1999

    2000

    2001

    2002

    2003

    2004

    2005

    2006

    2007

    2008

    2009

    2010

    2011

    2012

    2013

    2014

    2015

    2016

    2017

    2018

    2019

    2020

    2021

    2022

    2023

    2024

    2025

    2026

    2027

    2028

    2029

    2030

    Cum

    ulat

    ive

    Stor

    age

    (Mt)

    Year end

    Sleipner Snøhvit New CCS? Projections based on simple assumptions

    1.0 Annual rate 1.3 2.0

    Rate of CO2 sequestration

    Annual rate of gas injection in all Equinor-operated oilfields (NCS)

    • ~35 Gsm3/year (methane)

    • Which is equivalent to 64.8Mt CO2

    9 |

    Ringrose, 2018

  • Open

    H21 North of England Project (Transport and Storage part)Engineering concept study for a 17-20 Mtpa storage scheme for H21 (UK storage option):

    • Assessed 3 Triassic Bunter sandstone structures in UK Southern North Sea

    • Solution involves 12 sub-sea wells drilled from 4 templates

    • Baseload and seasonal fluctuations assessed

    10 | Document Title

  • Open

    Model scenario for H21 UK storage scheme with ramp-up and seasonal load

    11 |

  • Open12 |

    Remember those early “oil gusher wells” (e.g. California oil rush)

    • Natural pressure depletion

    Since then the oil industry has used pressure management and water/gas injection to maximize recovery

    • Secondary and Tertiary recovery

    Large-scale CO2 storage will also require pressure management

    • Re-pressurization technology

    Oilfield with natural

    buoyancy pressure

    Domain for large-scale storage

    re-pressurization

    The Pressure Management story

    Ringrose & Meckel (work in progress); minimum stress data from Bolaas and Hermanrud (2003)

    Depressurization pathways?

  • Open

    Pressure management for contrasting injection projects

    13 |

    Pwell

    Pinit

    Time

    Pfinal

    Pfrac

    Pres

    sure

    Formation re-pressurization case

    Case of injection under pressure depletion

    CO2 in gas phase

    Keys factors we need to understand or control:

    • Injection pressure, Pwell• Fracture pressure, Pfrac• Acceptable injection

    pressure limits

    • Plume expansion (site conformance)

    • Phase behavior

    • Geological uncertainties

  • Open

    Gt-scale injection under pressure depletionExamples from Nazarian et al. (2019), GHGT-14 Conference

    14 |

  • Open

    Building confidence using advanced monitoring solutionsSummary from Ringrose et al. (2019), GHGT-14 Conference

    Advanced cost-effective monitoring is key to storage confidence:

    • Blend of marine-streamer seismic acquisition, supplemented by sparse seabed-node system

    • Use of fibre-optic downhole monitoring wherever possible• Environmental monitoring - optimised/targeted• Use advanced data analysis methods (go digital)

    15 |

    Value proposition – Norway offshore reference case:

    Lifetime cost of monitoring programme:

    ~42 Million Euro (M€) or ~2€/tonne

    Key storage project cost items:

    1. Offshore injection well ~50-100M€

    2. Major well intervention programme ~10M€Cost vs. benefit

  • Open

    Conclusions

    1. Urgent need for rapid decarbonisation of energy, industry and food supply

    2. A modified oil and gas industry has the skills/tools/dimensions needed

    3. CO2 storage in saline aquifers has huge potential:

    1 Sleipner injector well = Emissions of 100 million tonnes/km of maritime shipping

    4. Large-scale CCS will need basin-scale pressure management approach

    Need to consider basin/formation pressure limits

    Could utilize ‘depletion space’ from oilfield history

    5. Although CCS is a ‘large ticket’ item… the societal value is undeniable

    Cost of avoided emissions per €/$/£ is excellent value for money

    Ready to move forward in support of the H21 Hydrogen project

    16 |

  • Open

    References• Bolås, H. M. N., & Hermanrud, C. (2003). Hydrocarbon leakage processes and trap retention capacities offshore Norway. Petroleum Geoscience,

    9(4), 321-332

    • Hansen, O., Gilding, D., Nazarian, B., Osdal, B., Ringrose, P., Kristoffersen, J. B., ... & Hansen, H. (2013). Snøhvit: The history of injecting and storing 1 Mt CO2 in the fluvial Tubåen Fm. Energy Procedia, 37, 3565-3573

    • Nazarian, B., Thorsen, R & Ringrose, P. 2018, Storing CO2 in a reservoir under continuous pressure depletion – a simulation study, GHGT-14 Conference Proceedings, Melbourne, Australia.

    • Pawar, R. J., Bromhal, G. S., Carey, J. W., Foxall, W., Korre, A., Ringrose, P. S., ... & White, J. A. (2015). Recent advances in risk assessment and risk management of geologic CO 2 storage. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 40, 292-311

    • Ringrose, Philip S. "Principles of sustainability and physics as a basis for the low-carbon energy transition." Petroleum Geoscience 23.3 (2017): 287-297.

    • Ringrose, P. S. (2018). The CCS hub in Norway: some insights from 22 years of saline aquifer storage. Energy Procedia, 146, 166-172.• Ringrose, P., Furre, A-K, Bakke, R., et al., 2018. Developing optimised and cost-effective solutions for monitoring CO2 injection from subsea wells,

    GHGT-14 Conference Proceedings, Melbourne, Australia.

  • © Equinor ASAThis presentation, including the contents and arrangement of the contents of each individual page or the collection of the pages, is owned by Equinor. Copyright to all material including, but not limited to, written material, photographs, drawings, images, tables and data remains the property of Equinor. All rights reserved. Any other use, reproduction, translation, adaption, arrangement, alteration, distribution or storage of this presentation, in whole or in part, without the prior written permission of Equinor is prohibited. The information contained in this presentation may not be accurate, up to date or applicable to the circumstances of any particular case, despite our efforts. Equinor cannot accept any liability for any inaccuracies or omissions.

    Philip Ringrose

    The role of the oil and gas sector in decarbonisation

    Acknowledgements• The Northern Lights project partners: Equinor, Shell and Total • Many colleagues at Equinor R&T Future Value Chains

    The role of the oil and gas sector in decarbonisationSlide Number 2Can human society decarbonise rapidly enough?What will the future of energy look like?What does large-scale CCS look like?Monitoring the subsurface at SnøhvitThe Norwegian CCS Demonstration projectNorwegian CO2 Storage: Future potentialNorway CO2 storage in numbersH21 North of England Project (Transport and Storage part)Model scenario for H21 UK storage scheme with ramp-up and seasonal loadThe Pressure Management storyPressure management for contrasting injection projectsGt-scale injection under pressure depletion�Examples from Nazarian et al. (2019), GHGT-14 ConferenceBuilding confidence using advanced monitoring solutions�Summary from Ringrose et al. (2019), GHGT-14 ConferenceConclusionsReferencesThe role of the oil and gas sector in decarbonisation