the role of retail
TRANSCRIPT
Milton
Atawhai
Marina Wakefield Quay
Tahunanui
Mitre 10 Mega Blackcat
Stoke Nayland
Monaco
Robinsons/McCashins Saxton Bunnings
Nelson
Couplands Ngawhatu
Marsden
Map 3
Map 2
Nelson Region Centres
Nelson Centres
Richmond Central Business Zone Nelson Central Business Zone
approx 27.5 ha approx 26.5 ha
2,200 jobs 7,900 jobs
Yet Richmond is more central to the total catchment and has much higher growth……and the land use preferences (zoning) for each town are largely identical…
Buildings & Jobs
Nelson Centres
The material difference between Nelson & Richmond CBDs is built quality.
Diminishing quality
Nelson Centres
Richmond Central Business Zone Nelson Central Business Zone
2,200 jobs 7,900 jobs
Intensity & Parking
approx 5.5 ha for parking (20% of total) = 25 sqm of parking per employee
approx 3.5 ha for parking (13%) = 4.4 sqm of parking per employee
Nelson Centres Amenity & Economy
Urban amenity is a major stimulant of high value jobs growth Urban amenity is a stimulator of high value immigration & human capital Urban amenity promotes a state of ‘‘wellbeing ’’ Urban amenity is a fundamental in quality of life Urban amenity increases levels of walking and reduces car use Urban amenity requires good if not great buildings
Why then do we primarily control activity & not buildings in our centres?
Nelson Centres Buildings
Perceptual characteristics of streets suited to pedestrians & motorists
Pedestrians Motorists Sudden changes in direction & short views
Gradual curves & long views
Irregular rhythms Regular rhythms
Narrow streets & spaces Wide streets & spaces
Asymmetry of roadside objects
Symmetry of roadside objects
Complex buildings Simple buildings
Sudden changes in modulation & large complexity range
Gradual changes in modulation & small complexity range
Nelson Centres Pedestrians & Cars
1. Frontage entirely devoted to cars. Low sustainability, low viability as a centre. Not public transport supportive, low amenity, no inspirational potential for other land uses, devalues sites opposite. The ideal model of the retail industry.
2. Split Frontage partially devoted to cars. Slightly more sustainable, slightly better viability as a centre. More public transport supportive, modest amenity, partly walkable, some inspirational potential for other land uses.
3. Frontage devoted to pedestrians. High sustainability, high viability as a centre. Public transport supportive, high amenity, walkable, strong inspirational potential for other land uses, values sites opposite. Not the ideal model of the retail industry.
Nelson Centres Pedestrians & Cars
Require retail built to the street edge (parking behind).
Levelling the playing field – Citywide Control – prioritise pedestrians in centres & with respect to ALL retail activity
Nelson Centres Retail & Economy
Why do we ensure that it is easy to build retail outside our centres?
Levelling the playing field
Easier Harder
Nelson Centres Retail & Economy
Because we seem to believe that retail buildings should behave differently out of town than in town….or at least differently than all other buildings. We allow them to build poor quality buildings with no amenity
Levelling the playing field
Easier Harder
Nelson Centres Retail & Economy
We haven’t built a town where buildings primarily address streets in NZ since 1934 (Napier).
Levelling the playing field
Since the late 1970s we’ve built malls and boxes……parking in front.
Nelson Centres City Wealth
Retail is a low wealth activity – it is also a low wage activity. When good buildings address streets, retail becomes a catalyst to higher economic & social output.
Nelson Centres City Wealth
Between 2000 and 2011 Nelson’s population grew by 4,200 people. Between 2000 and 2011 Nelson’s employment grew by 4,470 people. Tasman District (2000 – 2011): 2.7 residents per 1 job. Nelson City (2000 – 2011): 1 resident per 1 job. Richmond Town Centre: 2 retail jobs per 2.1 non retail jobs Nelson City Centre: 2 retail jobs per 4.4 non retail jobs
Nelson Centres HONs - employment
HONs three proposed inner city extensions Each with a different land use bias
The importance of these extensions is confirmed by Tim’s analysis Nelson CBD needs 3-4 ha
Nelson Centres Specialty Retail
Expansion capacity Tim – OK to 2021
HONs – edge condition (specs) Intensify & grow to & engage with Inner City Extensions (design controls)
Nelson Centres
Every building in Nelson centres should IMPROVE the amenity of the centre (this is a very different emphasis from “not detract from” or “minimising effects”).
Nelson’s economic performance is under threat from earthquake risk management – as you do not have appropriate controls to ensure that the vast majority of buildings that will be demolished will be replaced with buildings of quality
Diminishing quality
Nelson Centres
The quality of Nelson CBD is reflected in its built character. This character is one of the major causes of your economic success.
Business leaders and jobs creators do
not seek out ugly towns (Florida, Glaeser)
Diminishing quality
Nelson Centres
Why then do you not have a regulatory framework that requires good if not great buildings, as a part of your economic strategy?
Diminishing quality
Nelson Centres Making the City
As a market place Specialisation - employment diversity - the exchange of goods, services & knowledge
As a meeting place Democratic space
- variation, demonstration, opportunity - population groups, lifestyle, cultures/subcultures, opinion
Nelson Centres As a Marketplace “Community hubs across the district are lively gathering places that hum with pride
in “our place” and a sense of belonging.” Nelson 2060
Critical Success Factors Public space dominant (urban, edgy) - Indicator: level of pedestrians in streets, adaptable buildings Culture heavy (art, architecture, food and space)
- the joy not the ease
Nelson Centres As a Meetingplace
Critical Success Factors Public space dominant (freedom of choice) - Indicator: level of pedestrians in streets Culture heavy (art, architecture, food and space)
- the joy not the ease
“Community hubs across the district are lively gathering places that hum with pride in “our place” and a sense of belonging.” Nelson 2060
Milton
Atawhai
Marina Wakefield Quay
Tahunanui
Mitre 10 Mega Blackcat
Stoke Nayland
Monaco
Robinsons/McCashins Saxton Bunnings
Nelson
Couplands Ngawhatu
Marsden
Nelson Region Centres
Nelson Centres General Principles
Overall minor interventions ….
● Play an important local role ● Encourage to continue & grow ● Some leveraging of specific identified opportunities ● Little capacity to leverage increased housing density ● Improved suite of controls
Nelson Centres Stoke Likely susceptible to changes in Richmond ● Supermarkets undersized ● Could be a problem centre in future ● Needs work on context and controls (incl surrounding zoning)
Nelson Centres Tahunanui Tahunanui – Catchment for Local Centre
Key Statistics NZ Boundary Likely additional catchments
2006 Tahunanui = 1,998 people
2006 Tahuna Hills (part) = 1,500 people
2006 Airport = 800 people
2006 Britannia = 1,300 people
2006 = 10,000 – 11,000 people Incl 5,000 immediately south (Nayland, Maitland, Enner Glynn)
Nelson Centres Tahunanui Tahunanui – Catchment for Local Centre
2006 = 10,000 – 11,000 people
Current location has no capacity to serve the catchment
Move ‘‘centre’’ south & inboard (toward Ocean Lodge land)
Nelson Centres Tahunanui
Of all locations outside of the city centre Tahunanui has the greatest potential for residential density
Nelson Centres Non Centres
Wakefield Quay & Marina ● Preserve Marina site for expansion of marina related activity
Nelson Centres Non Centres
Wakefield Quay & Marina ● Look at an integrated master plan for Wakefield Quay,
improve link to Tahunanui
Nelson Centres Context
Tasman is in a phase of spatial planning – due to growth and availability of land.
Nelson is a mature market with little greenfield
potential. It’s planning requirements are “technical”- inspiring growth by making better use of what you’ve got.
Nelson Centres Nelson & Tasman
“Cities do not exist in vacuums but are connected to a surrounding region with which they share resources and opportunities. Rather than just looking within municipal boundaries, city leaders who plan together can create a competitive advantage out of cross-municipal coordination.” -
- Urban Planning for City Leaders, UN - Habitat 2012.
Nelson Centres Nelson Economy
Nelson’s economic strength lies in a myriad of small businesses who thrive around the nexus of a strong urban centre and stunning natural environment.
Nelson Centres Tasman Economy
Tasman’s economic strength lies in its proximity to Nelson, land availability, servicing population growth and ease of entry for non-urban businesses.
Nelson Centres
Successful cities build momentum by tackling priority projects that are aligned with an overall vision.
- Urban Planning for City Leaders, UN - Habitat 2012.
Civic Leadership
Nelson Centres
Planning identifies pressing issues and available resources, and ensures that initiatives are not redundant or are going in different directions.
- Urban Planning for City Leaders, UN - Habitat 2012.
Planning
Nelson Centres
Buildings are the most important economic asset of the city and should be the priority for regulation.
When buildings define public space the city becomes a
loved and heavily used market and meeting place – ultimately heritage.
Nelson Regulation
Nelson Centres Summary
No new centres needed.
Get your community to tell you what they love about Nelson’s urban qualities and use this information to regulate.
Improve the qualities of existing centres by partnering with property owners & tenants.
Nelson Centres Summary
Recognise that your economic success is tied to your urban quality and it is diminishing (relatively).
Believe in the quality of your urban environment and regulate to ensure improvement (not just manage adverse effects).
Continue to grow your economic base by requiring buildings to address streets (not car parks).