the role of lower hybrid waves in space...
TRANSCRIPT
The Role of Lower Hybrid Waves in Space Plasmas
Robert BinghamRutherford Appleton Laboratory,
Space Science & Technology Department
Conference on Sun-Earth Connections: Multiscale Coupling in Sun-Earth Processes, Feb. 2004.
Collaborators: V. D. Shapiro, D. Ucer, K. B. Quest, B. J. Kellett, R. Trines, .P. K. Shukla, J. T. Mendonça, L. Silva, L. Gargate.
Summary of TalkIntroduction
• Role of Waves in the Space• Generation of waves – nonlinear propagation• Acceleration of Particles• Radiation – AKR
WavesLower Hybrid +Kinetic Alfven Nonlinear StructuresIon Acoustic e.g. CAVITONS
ParticlesElectron, Ion: BeamsElectron, Ion: Beams
⇒⇒ Instabilities Instabilities
e.g. CYCLOTRON MASERe.g. CYCLOTRON MASER
Introduction• Interactions between the solar wind and comets and non-magnetised
planets lead to the production of energetic electrons and ions which are responsible for:-– X-ray Emission from Comets – Chandra and XMM spectra– X-rays from Planets
• Venus• Earth• [Mars]• Jupiter
– Io torus and several Jovian moons• [Saturn
– Titan]
• Similar processes may also be occurring elsewhere:-– Helix Nebula – Cometary Knots– High Velocity Clouds– Supernova Shock Front/Cloud Interaction
• Theory and Modelling– Energetic electron generation by lower-hybrid plasma wave turbulence – Comet X-ray spectral fits– Io torus model
⇐ Now detected in X-rays!
⇐ Future planned targets!
MOON VENUSCOMET C/LINEAR
JUPITER SUN
CRAB NEBULA (SNR) SKY (HVCs)
radio
Sources – Optical & X-ray Images
Role of WavesIntroduction:
• Large Amplitude Waves - collisionless energy and momentum transport.
- Formation of coherent nonlinear structures. .• Kinetic Alfven waves and ion cyclotron waves
Accelerate ions parallel to the magnetic fieldPonderomotive force also creates density striation structures
Kinetic Alfven wave Solitons – SKAWs
• Lower-HybridAccelerates electrons parallel to the magnetic fieldAccelerates ions perpendicular to the magnetic fieldFormation of cavitons
• Langmuir Waves – consequences of electron beams• Ion (electron) acoustics• Whistlers + LH present at reconnection sites
• Anisotropic electron beam distributions ⇒ AKR (Auroral Kilometric Radiation)
Lower-Hybrid Waves in Space Plasmas
• Auroral regionPrecipitating electrons, perpendicular ion heating (Chang & Coppi, 1981).Ion horseshoe distributions – electron acceleration.Cavitons (Shapiro et al., 1995).
• MagnetopauseL-H turbulence – cross field e- transport, diffusion close to Bohm.Anomalous resistivity – reconnection (Sotnikov et al., 1980; Bingham et al., 2004).
• Bow ShockElectron energization (Vaisling et al., 1982).
• MagnetotailAnomalous resistivity, LHDI (Huba et al., 1993; Yoon et al., 2002).Current disruption (Lui et al., 1999).
Lower-Hybrid Waves in Space Plasmas (cont.)
• Mars, Venus (Mantle region)Accelerated electrons, heated ions (Sagdeev et al., 1990; Dobe et al., 1999).
• CometsElectron heating (Bingham et al., 1997).
• Critical velocity of ionizationDischarge ionization (Alfven, 1954; Galeev et al., 1982).
• Artificial comet release experimentsAMPTE comet simulations (Bingham et al., 1991).
Lower-Hybrid Waves in Space Plasmas
• Hence electrons are magnetized, ions are unmagnetized.• Cerenkov resonance with electrons parallel to the magnetic field:-
• Cerenkov resonance with ions perpendicular to magnetic field:-
• Simultaneous resonance with fast electrons moving along B and slow ions moving across B.
• Transfers energy from ions to electrons (or vice versa)
, with small pp LH ce kω ω ω ⊥ 0k B
evkω
=
iv k kkω
⊥ ⊥⊥
=
1 12 22 2
2 2 2 22 2
12 2
21
pp pe pp pe
epe
ce
k kk k
ω ω ω ωω
ε ωω
⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞+ +⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠= =⎛ ⎞+⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠
204where ppp
n emπω =
Generation of Lower-Hybrid Waves at Shocks
As the plasma flows through the interacting medium, pick-up ions form an anisotropic distribution
y
x
z B
Shock Wave
These ions move in the crossed E and B fields - following cycloidalpaths:-
where is the shock wave velocity ⊥ to the magnetic field B.
( )( )0cos1v ttu cix −−= ⊥ ω ( )( )0sinv ttu ciy −= ⊥ ω
/u E B⊥ =
The beam is unstable ⇒ modified two stream instability (MTSI) (McBride et al. 1972).
Ion Pick-Up in Comets (also Mars & Venus)
• If B ⊥ vSW the heavy ions are carried away by the streaming plasma (pick-up)
• Energy
keV for N, v⊥ ~ 400 km/seci.e. a beam is formed
2v2
iim=⊥ε
20=
B
vb
The Modified Two Stream Instability
• A cross-field ion beam generates lower-hybrid waves
Lower-hybrid dispersion relation
vi
B
01 2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2 =−++ ⊥
ωω
ωω
ωω pipez
ce
pe
kk
kk
||||2
||222 , , , kkkkkkkkkk zyx >>=+=+= ⊥⊥⊥
||||v ,v
kkωω
==⇒⊥
⊥
||v v <<∴ ⊥
• Dispersion relation changes when an ion beam is present -
ui is ⊥ ion beam, kz = k⎪⎪(Fluid limit )
For
Then (1) becomes
Let ω' is complex
⇒ growth rate
( ) (1) 01 2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
=⋅−
−−+i
pipez
ce
pex
ukkk
kk
ωω
ωω
ωω
ωωρ ≤⋅−<<< eiie kukkk v ,v ,1 ||
1 ,~ 2
221
≅⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛kk
mm
kk x
i
ez
( ) 01 2
2
2
2
2
2
=⋅−
−−+i
pipe
ce
pe
ukωω
ωω
ωω
iuk ⋅−=′21ωω iyx +=′ω
( ) LH
cepe
pi ωωω
ωγ 2
1
2122
21
1≅
+=
LHωγ 21≅
Electron Acceleration by Lower-Hybrid Waves
• Parallel component resonates with electrons
• Perpendicular component resonates with ions
– Note
• Model LH waves transfer energy between ions andelectrons
k⊥k||
B (magnetic field)
||
vkeω
≅
⊥
≅kiωv
21
~||
⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛⊥
e
i
mm
kk
ION BEAM
vi= vi⊥
Energetic Electrons
ve= ve⊥
Lower-Hybrid Waves
⇒ ⇒
Energy Balance at Shocks
• The free energy is the relative motion between the shock wave and the newly created interaction ions.
• Characteristic energy and density of suprathermal electrons obtained using conservation equations between energy flux of ions into wave turbulence and absorption of wave energy by electrons.
• In steady state energy flux of pick-up ions equals energy flux carried away by suprathermal electrons.Energy flux balance equation:-
• Balancing growth rate of lower-hybrid waves γi due to interaction pick-up ions with Landau damping rate γe on electrons.
(2) 21
3⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛≅
e
eeTeSSWcici m
numn εεα
0=+ ei γγ ⇒ (3) 2umnn
ci
ci
e
Te ≅ε
Example
25
1
52
SSWcici
ee umm
m⎟⎠⎞⎜
⎝⎛≅ αε
(4) vvvv
v||||||
2
||2
2
||
e||
⎪⎭
⎪⎬⎫
⎪⎩
⎪⎨⎧
∂∂⋅
⋅∆∂∂
=∂∂ e
e
fk
E
mef
; v 2|||| Ek LHω=∆
(5) m 2
e 3
2
21
2
e
2
emax ⎥⎦
⎤⎢⎣
⎡≅ fEl
πε
From 2 and 3 the average energy of the suprathermal electrons is given by
• For nitrogen ions mciu2 ≈ 1 keVAverage energy εe ~ 100 eVDensity nTe ≈ 1 cm-3
⇒ Powerful source of suprathermal electrons⇒ 1019 erg/sec through X-ray region.
• Electron energy spectrum obtained by solving the quasi-linear velocity diffusion equation.
Note L-H wave field.
Max. electron energy
Quasi-Linear Model• The electron energy spectrum can be obtained by solving the standard quasilinear
diffusion equation. Since electrons are magnetised in the lower-hybrid oscillation only field aligned motion is allowed leading to the 1-D stationary case (e.g. Davidson, 1977):
Here, fe(z,v⎜⎜) is the one dimensional electron distribution function, |E⎜⎜k|2 is the one dimensional electric field spectral density, z is the magnetic field direction and v⎜⎜denotes the electron velocity parallel to B. Rewriting the electric field spectral density in the electrostatic limit
and then integrating over k⎜⎜ with the help of the δ function, leads to the Fokker-Planck equation:
( )2 2
22e e
k ke
f fev dk E k vz m v v
δ ω⎡ ⎤∂ ∂∂
= −⎢ ⎥∂ ∂ ∂⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦
∫
22 2
2k k
kE E
k=
2 2 22
2
k
ke e
e k v
E k kf fevz m v vv k
ωω
=
⎡ ⎤∂ ∂∂ ⎢ ⎥=⎢ ⎥∂ ∂ ∂− ∂ ∂⎣ ⎦
• Using
• And assuming
• We can then write the resonant electron-wave interaction in the form
• And the denominator as
• Resonance between the electron parallel velocity and the group velocity of the waves then strongly enhances the particle diffusion.
• Using a gaussian wave spectral distribution with ε = mev2⎜⎜/2Tp has the field aligned
energy of the resonant electrons normalised to the proton temperature
k ce
kk
ω ω=
and 1e
p
k mk m
β>
ce kvω =
2
232
kv vk kω∂− ∂
( )22 2
2
1 expp ek
e LH
TE E
mπ ε εε
ω
⎡ ⎤−= −⎢ ⎥
∆ ∆⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦
• With some typical scale length R0, we can normalise the acceleration distance as ξ = z / R0.
• The energy diffusion equation can then be written
• The diffusion coefficient G(ε) is of the form
• Assuming a Lorentz shape for the spectral distribution
• Leads to
( )f fG εξ ε ε∂ ∂ ∂
=∂ ∂ ∂
( ) ( )2220
2 20
1 exp4
cp p pe e
e ce pp p
ER mG
m n TT mω ω ε εεε
ωπ
⎡ ⎤−= −⎢ ⎥
∆ ∆⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦
( )
2 32 2
22 2
12 pk
e ce LHe
TE E
m uε
ω ω ε ε
∆=
⎡ ⎤− + ∆⎣ ⎦
( )( )
22 2 30
22 2 20
12
p pe
cp e ce pe
EmR uGm n T
ω εεπ ω ω ε ε
∆=
⎡ ⎤− + ∆⎣ ⎦
Solutions of the Fokker-Planck Eq.
Particle-in-Cell Simulations of Cross Field Ion Flow
Ion energy increased by x30-100
Final electron distribution
v||
v⊥
v⊥/c
t=380
f (v||)
tv||
fe (v||)
Time evolution of the parallel component of the electron distribution
ωpe t
x
Test Particle Trajectories & Caviton Formation
B0
y
Strong Turbulence/Caviton Formation
Simulations
Lower-Hybrid Dissipative Cavitons• Lower-hybrid cavitons in the auroral zone.
– Observations reveal E ≥ 300mV/m – this is greater than the threshold (~50 mV/m) for Modulational Instability (Kintner et al., 1992; Wahlund et al., 1994).
• The modulational interaction is created by the ponderomotive force exerted by the waves on the plasma particles.
• The ponderomotive force is due to the Reynolds stress and creates density modulations.
• Density modulations lead to the formation of unipolar and dipolar cavitons.
• Density modulation δn/n0 produces two corrections to the lower-hybrid frequency
( ).B v v∇
δn
LH waveLH wave
Cavitons• The equation for the slow variation of the lower-hybrid electric potential
is
• The equation for the slow density variation is
• Driven by the ponderomotive force of the lower-hybrid wave.– 1st term on RHS is the scalar non-linearity– 2nd term on RHS is the vector non-linearity
• Similar process can occur for lower-hybrid waves coupled to kinetic Alfven waves. In this case the density perturbation of the Alfven wave is expressed through the vector potential.
• Observed lower-hybrid waves with fields of order 300mV/m can excite Alfven waves with field strength B ~ 1nT.
222 2 4
2 2
2 pei
lh e
mi Rt m z c
ωϕϕ ϕ ϕω
∂ ∂− ∇ − ∇ + + =
∂ ∂
( )2 22
22 *2 2
116 16
pe pe
i ce i ce
n T int m m m
ω ωδ δ ϕ ϕ ϕπ ω π ωω
∂− ∇ = − ∆ ∇ + ∇ ×∇ ⋅
∂e
( ) ( ) ( )2 22
0 02
1 2
1
lh i
pece e lh
ce
m nn din m n iω δϕ δ ϕ ϕ
ωω ωω
′ ′∇ ×∇ ⋅ − ∇ + Γ − ∇+
∫e r r r r
Lower Hybrid Drift Instability
• We assume the lower hybrid drift instability is operating in the kinetic regime (VDi << VTi ). Its maximum growth rate is:
• with a perpendicular wavenumber of
• Where
• and
22 8
D ilh
T i
VV
πγ ω⎛ ⎞
= ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠
1 2
2 2 lh e cem
T i i T i
mkV m Vω ⎛ ⎞ Ω
= = ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠
21 2
D i L i
T i
V rV x⊥
⎛ ⎞= ⎜ ⎟∆⎝ ⎠
1 ln ln Bxx xρ−
⊥⊥ ⊥
∂ ∂= ≈
∂ ∂
Lower-Hybrid Drift Instability at Current Sheets
Basic Theory of Magnetic Reconnection
• The Lower Hybrid Drift Instability (LHDI) is an excellent mechanism for producing LHWs and is relatively easy to excite by slow moving MHD flows found at reconnection sites
Dissipation RegionVout Vout
Vin
Vin
• Demanding the waves have time to grow places a constraint on thedamping rate, we require
• The characteristic scale length required to maintain the drift current at marginal stability is given by
10 gD
Vx
γ ⊥
⊥
≈∆
1 25 32
iLi
e
mx rm
π⊥∆ ≈
• If we now demand a balance between the Poynting flux of electromagnetic energy flowing into the tail and the rate of Ohmicdissipation, we find the resistivity required
• Now which implies
• but
• or
• where we have used an earlier result and λpe = c/ωpe is the plasma skin depth.
2
4 inV xc
πη ⊥∆=
24 / pevη π ω⊥=2 2
44 pein inpe
pe
V x Vv xc c c
ωππ ωω
⊥⊥ ⊥
∆= = ∆
2
8pe
Ev
nkTδ
ωπ⊥ =
21 2
8 5 32i Li in
e pe
E m r VnkT m c
δ ππ λ
=
• Using the same set of parameters as used by Huba, Gladd, and Papadopoulos (1977), that is, B ≈ 2.0 x 10-4 gauss, n ≈ 10, and kTi ≈10-3mic2 we find ∆x⊥ ≈ 0.67rLi, rLi ≈ 1.16 x 107 cm, VTi ≈ 2.2 x107 cm/s, λpe ≈ 1.68 x 106 cm, and VA ≈ 1.38 x 107 cm/s.
• Taking Vin ≈ 0.1VA we find
• We can compute the energies and fluxes of non-thermal electrons.
242.13 10
8EnkT
δ
π−≈ ×
Electron Temperature
• A rough estimate of the change in temperature of the electrons due to the Ohmic heating can be obtained by noting that as the plasma flows through and out of the region of instability electrons will experience Ohmic heating for a time ∆t ≈ L/VA , hence the change in electron temperature during this period is
• We find
2
BA
J Lk Tn V
η∆ ≈
25 3242
eB
i A Li
m u B Lk Tm V rn ππ
⋅∆ ≈
• Using the previous parameters we find
• In the magneto-tail rLi ≈ 1.16 x 107 cm, VA ≈ 1.38 x 107 cm/s and ∆x|| ≈VA∆t ≈ 1000 – 6000 km and using
• results in electron temperatures of order a few hundred or more eV
1( ) 2.9 10Li
LT evr
∆ ≈ ×
1( ) 2.9 10Li
LT evr
∆ ≈ ×
Ion Temperature• The LHDI leads to strong ion heating perpendicular to the
magnetic field. Equipartition of energy indicates that 2/3 of the available free energy ends up in ion heating and 1/3 ends up in heating the electrons parallel to the magnetic field. The simplecalculation below confirms this argument. To estimate the ion temperature we utilize the fact that the ratio of ion and electron drifts is given by
• together with Ampere's equation yields
Di i
De e
V TV T
=
1 2 Ai e
V xT Tu x
⊥⎛ ⎞∆
= +⎜ ⎟⎜ ⎟∆⎝ ⎠
The LHD instability can generate relatively large amplitude lower hybrid waves in current sheets. These LH waves are shown to be capable ofaccelerating electrons and heating ions in the current sheet during reconnection. The process describes the micro-physics of particle heating and generation during reconnection. The mechanism is important in the magnetosphere and other space environments where reconnection is invoked to explain particle heating and acceleration.
Wave kinetics: a novel approach to the interaction of waves with plasmas, leading to a new description of turbulence in plasmas and atmospheres [1-5].
A monochromatic wave is described as a compact distribution of quasi-particles.
Broadband turbulence is described as a gas of quasi-particles (photons, plasmons, driftons, etc.)
[1] R. Trines et al., in preparation (2004).[2] J. T. Mendonça, R. Bingham, P. K. Shukla, Phys. Rev. E 68, 0164406 (2003).[3] L.O. Silva et al., IEEE Trans. Plas. Sci. 28, 1202 (2000).[4] R. Bingham et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 247 (1997).[5] R. Bingham et al., Physics Letters A 220, 107 (1996).
Wave Kinetic Approach to Drift Mode Turbulence
Lower-hybrid drift modes at the magnetopause
Strong plasma turbulence – Langmuir wave collapse
Zonal flows in a “drifton gas” – anomalous transport driven by density/temperature gradients
Turbulence in planetary, stellar atmospheres – Rossby waves
Intense laser-plasma interactions, e.g. plasma accelerators
Plasma waves driven by neutrino bursts
The list goes on
Applications
We define the quasiparticle density as the waveenergy density divided by the quasiparticle energy:
The number of quasiparticles is conserved:
Then we can apply Liouville’s theorem:
where andare obtained from the q.p. dispersion relation
)(/),,(),,( ktrkWtrkN ω=
∫ = 0),,( kdrdtrkNdtd
0),,(),,( =⎟⎠⎞
⎜⎝⎛
∂∂
+∂∂
+∂∂
= trkNk
Fr
vt
trkNdtd
kdtxdv ∂∂== // ω xddtkdF // ω−∂==
Liouville Theory
Lower hybrid drift modes…
control plasma transport at the magnetopause,
provide anomalous resistivity necessary for
reconnection at tangential discontinuities,
control the transport determining the thickness of the
magnetopause boundary layer.
We aim to study them through the quasi-particle method.
Application: Drift Waves
We use the model for 2-D drift waves by Smolyakov, Diamond, and Shevchenko [6]
Fluid model for the plasma (el. static potential Φ(r)):
Particle model for the “driftons”:
Drifton number conservation;
Hamiltonian:
Equations of motion: from the Hamiltonian
( ) kdNkk
kkt k
r
r 22221∫ ++
=∂Φ∂
ϑ
ϑ
( ) ,1 22*
ϑ
ϑϑω
kkVk
rk
ri ++
+∂Φ∂
=rn
nV
∂∂
−= 0
0*
1
[6] A.I. Smolyakov, P.H. Diamond, and V.I. Shevchenko, Phys. Plasmas 7, 1349 (2000).
Condensed Theory of Drift Waves
Two spatial dimensions, cylindrical geometry,
Homogeneous, broadband drifton distribution,
A 2-D Gaussian plasma density distribution around the origin.
We obtained the following results:
Modulational instability of drift modes,
Excitation of a zonal flow,
Solitary wave structures drifting outwards.
Simulations
Radial e.s. field and plasma density fluctuations versus radius r :
Excitation of a zonal flow for small r, i.e. small background density gradients,
Propagation of “zonal” solitons towards larger r, i.e. regions with higher gradients.
Simulation Results – 1
-0.005
0
0.005
0.01
20 40 60 80
t=200t=300
-0.005
0
0.005
0.01
20 40 60 80
t=400t=500
-0.06
-0.04
-0.02
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
20 40 60 80
t=400t=500
-0.06
-0.04
-0.02
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
20 40 60 80
t=200t=300
r
E
r
E
δn
δn
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
t=300
Radial and azimuthal wave numbers versus r:
Bunching and drift of driftons under influence of zonal flow,
Some drifton turbulence visible at later times.
r
kr
r
kθ
-4
-2
0
2
4
0 20 40 60 80
t=500
-4
-2
0
2
4
0 20 40 60 80
t=300
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
t=500
kr
kθ
Simulation Results – 2
Wave kineticsWave kinetics……
Allows one to study the interaction of a vast spectrum of ‘fast’ waves with underdense plasmas,
Provides an easy description of broadband, incoherent waves and beams, e.g. L-H drift, magnetosonic modes, solitons
Helps us to understand drift wave turbulence, e.g. in the magnetosphere,
Future work:Future work: progress towards 2-D/3-D simulations and even more applications of the wave kinetic scheme
Wave kinetics: a valuable new perspective on wave-plasma interactions!
Lower-Hybrid Waves in Space Plasmas – Wave Kinetics
Conclusions • Lower-Hybrid waves play a unique role in all areas of space
plasmas.• Ideal for energizing ions/electrons and transferring free
energy from ions (electrons) to electrons (ions).• Non-Linear physics very rich
– e.g. cavitons– e.g. strong turbulence theories