the role of job satisfaction in employee retention among senior

23
European Journal of Education and Learning, Vol.54, 2008 ISSN(paper)2668-3318 ISSN(online)2668-361X www.BellPress.org 9 The Role of Job Satisfaction in Employee Retention among Senior High School Teachers in Ghana (A Case of the Asuogyaman District) Nana Nimo Appiah-Agyekum (Corresponding author) University of Ghana Business School P O box LG 78, Legon-Accra, Ghana Tel: 00233024748218 E-mail: [email protected] Emmanuel Tenakwah Senior University of Ghana Business School P O box LG 78, Legon-Accra, Ghana E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Job satisfaction is a significant phenomenon in senior high schools. Lowered job satisfaction and dissatisfaction are believed to influence staff member commitment, morale and turnover and this is particularly salient to the teaching profession. It is therefore in the interests of senior high schools and school systems to ensure that levels of job satisfaction are high so that the schools are places of relative stability and student learning. The primary aim of the study was to investigate the role of job satisfaction in employee retention in SHS teachers using the Asuogyaman District in Ghana as a case. To achieve this goal, seventy-five (75) SHS teachers drawn from the five (5) SHS’s in the Asuogyaman district filled questionnaires centering on the subject matter of the project. Their responses were assessed and presented using simple frequency tables. The analysed data was also weighed against the secondary data to derive conclusions for the study. The data was also discussed qualitatively. At the end of the study, it came to light that in job satisfaction indeed played a major role in employee retention among SHS teachers. Also SHS teachers were not satisfied with their conditions of service and were likely to leave if proactive steps were not taken to enhance their conditions of service. Keywords: Job satisfaction, Retention, Ghana, Teachers, Senior High School Introduction Global concerns about teacher satisfaction and their subsequent retention are acute principally due to the market transition which has opened up the labour markets and created alternate career paths to current and potential teachers (Bishsay, 1996). In similar fashion, frameworks for understanding academic achievement and the labor force outcomes of schooling have conceptualized teacher quality as a key input (Darling-Hammond, 1997) in the educational sphere.

Upload: allen-alfred

Post on 06-Mar-2016

220 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Role of Job Satisfaction in Employee Retention among Senior

European Journal of Education and Learning, Vol.54, 2008

ISSN(paper)2668-3318 ISSN(online)2668-361X

www.BellPress.org

9

The Role of Job Satisfaction in Employee Retention among Senior

High School Teachers in Ghana (A Case of the Asuogyaman

District)

Nana Nimo Appiah-Agyekum (Corresponding author)

University of Ghana Business School

P O box LG 78, Legon-Accra, Ghana

Tel: 00233024748218 E-mail: [email protected]

Emmanuel Tenakwah Senior

University of Ghana Business School

P O box LG 78, Legon-Accra, Ghana

E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Job satisfaction is a significant phenomenon in senior high schools. Lowered job satisfaction

and dissatisfaction are believed to influence staff member commitment, morale and turnover

and this is particularly salient to the teaching profession. It is therefore in the interests of

senior high schools and school systems to ensure that levels of job satisfaction are high so that

the schools are places of relative stability and student learning. The primary aim of the study

was to investigate the role of job satisfaction in employee retention in SHS teachers using the

Asuogyaman District in Ghana as a case. To achieve this goal, seventy-five (75) SHS teachers

drawn from the five (5) SHS’s in the Asuogyaman district filled questionnaires centering on

the subject matter of the project. Their responses were assessed and presented using simple

frequency tables. The analysed data was also weighed against the secondary data to derive

conclusions for the study. The data was also discussed qualitatively. At the end of the study, it

came to light that in job satisfaction indeed played a major role in employee retention among

SHS teachers. Also SHS teachers were not satisfied with their conditions of service and were

likely to leave if proactive steps were not taken to enhance their conditions of service.

Keywords: Job satisfaction, Retention, Ghana, Teachers, Senior High School

Introduction

Global concerns about teacher satisfaction and their subsequent retention are acute principally

due to the market transition which has opened up the labour markets and created alternate

career paths to current and potential teachers (Bishsay, 1996). In similar fashion, frameworks

for understanding academic achievement and the labor force outcomes of schooling have

conceptualized teacher quality as a key input (Darling-Hammond, 1997) in the educational

sphere.

Page 2: The Role of Job Satisfaction in Employee Retention among Senior

European Journal of Education and Learning, Vol.54, 2008

ISSN(paper)2668-3318 ISSN(online)2668-361X

www.BellPress.org

10

As put by Henry Adams in the Schools and Staffing Survey (1999-2000), "a teacher affects

eternity" in the sense that teachers profoundly appreciate the eternal dimensions of their work,

for they nourish not only the minds but also the hearts and souls of their students. By serving

in schools that emphasize a child's complete development, teachers also have the privileged

opportunity to transmit the core academic skills as well as the lessons that count most in life:

lessons about spirituality, love, values, the wonder of creation and the purpose of existence.

Indeed, the work of the high school teacher is of such significance, it is often regarded as a

ministry and a calling, rather than just a job (Van den berg, 2002). Attracting and retaining

high quality teachers is therefore a primary necessity as well as a challenge for educational

institutions.

In Ghana, though senior high school teachers are a crucial element of educational opportunity

structures, the recent opening-up of labour markets in general and within the school system

has raised concerns about retaining qualified teachers especially in senior high schools

serving poor communities. While several factors have been identified as accounting for the

above phenomena, recent studies conducted in some developing countries underscore the fact

that more than one quarter of the teachers who left teaching did so because of job

dissatisfaction (Henke, Choy, Chen, Geis, Alt, & Broughman, 1997). Teacher dissatisfaction

and its effects on teacher retention with recourse to the foregoing therefore pose a grave threat

to a profession with an increasing demand for members (Darling-Hammond, 1999).

Job satisfaction has been defined as a pleasurable emotional state resulting from the appraisal

of one’s job; an affective reaction to one’s job; and an attitude towards one’s job (Ubom,

2001). Weiss (2002) also argues that job satisfaction is an attitude but points out that

researchers should clearly distinguish the objects of cognitive evaluation which are affect

(emotion), beliefs and behaviours. In Ghana, Job satisfaction is an important component of

teachers’ lives that can impact on student safety and academic advancement, staff morale,

productivity and performance, quality of care, retention and turnover, commitment to the

educational institution and the profession with additional replacement costs (e.g. agency staff)

and further attempts to hire and orientate new staff. It has also been shown that when job

satisfaction in the teaching profession increases, turnover decreases (Robert et al, 2004).

Job satisfaction is also dynamic and can vary according to individual characteristics,

expectations, style of management, changes to policy and individual lifestyle choices (e.g.

Blegen, 1993; Haynes et al, 2006; Lu, 2005). In addition, demographic factors and teacher

specific and school specific characteristics also affect job satisfaction of the senior high

school teacher. Recent studies carried out in a number of countries have also drawn attention

to the degree of job satisfaction among teachers and have shown that teachers' work

“intensification” (Hargreaves, 1994) mirrors societal trends toward overwork (Naylor, 2001).

Imposed and centralized system accountability, lack of professional autonomy, relentlessly

imposed changes, constant media criticism, reduced resources, and moderate pay have all

been related to low teacher satisfaction in many developed countries around the world (Van

den Berg, 2002; Dinham and Scott, 1998).

The effects of the trends identified above according to Farber (1991) include declining job

satisfaction, reduced ability to meet students' needs, significant incidences of psychological

disorders leading to increased absenteeism, and high level of claims for stress-related

disability. Most importantly, teacher dissatisfaction appears to be a main factor in teachers

leaving the profession in many countries. Research into improving satisfaction among

Page 3: The Role of Job Satisfaction in Employee Retention among Senior

European Journal of Education and Learning, Vol.54, 2008

ISSN(paper)2668-3318 ISSN(online)2668-361X

www.BellPress.org

11

teachers especially at the senior high school level, with recourse to the foregoing, is becoming

more and more important given not only that a growing number of teachers leave the

profession but also that dissatisfaction is associated with decreased productivity. The study

therefore sets out to investigate the role of job satisfaction in employee retention among

senior high school teachers using the Asuogyaman District as a case.

JobSatisfactionofteachers

DefinitionandconceptJob satisfaction of teachers has been the focus of considerable research in recent decades (De

Nobile, 2003; Dinham & Scott, 1998). Given the links that have been established between job

satisfaction and employee commitment, turnover, absenteeism, productivity and occupational

stress (De Nobile & McCormick, 2005; Luthans, 2002; Singh & Billingsley, 1996; Spector,

2000), such interest is, perhaps, not surprising. Job satisfaction is defined as a positive

emotional state resulting from the appraisal of one's job situation and is linked with the

characteristics and demands of one's work (Evans, 2001). People's work-related satisfaction

consists of achieving change and improvement, and promoting their growth, which have

important implications on teachers' behaviours at work and affect their desire to continue their

work and their involvement in the job, and relationship with other staff. Further, while Job

satisfaction has been described as favourable or positive feelings about work or the work

environment, Job dissatisfaction has been conversely defined as unhappy or negative feelings

about work or the work environment (Furnham, 1997).

Lawler (1973) also argues that the concept of teacher satisfaction refers to a teacher's affective

relation to his or her teaching role and is a function of the perceived relationship between

what one wants from teaching and what one perceives it is offering to a teacher. From the

general point of view, Morse (1953) views the strength of an individual's “desires, or his/her

level of aspiration in a particular area” to be an important factor in job satisfaction. He

explains that those with the strongest desires or highest aspirations are least happy with their

job if the environment does not facilitate satisfaction of their needs. Along these lines,

Maeroff (1988) describes teachers' “sense of empowerment” as a major way “to make

teachers more professional and to improve their performance”. The power Maeroff referred to

is “the power to exercise one's craft with confidence and to help shape the way that the job is

to be done”.

Without slighting the above, it is universally held (see van den Berg, 2002; Dinham and Scott,

2002) that in terms of definitions, there is no generally agreed upon definition of teacher job

satisfaction or of what constitutes teacher satisfaction although there might be some

international trends such as, the notion that teachers are most satisfied by matters intrinsic to

the role of teaching: student achievement, helping students, positive relationships with

students and others, self growth and so on. In conclusion, Dinham and Scott (1999) argue that

context seems to be the most powerful predictor of overall satisfaction. As Cherniss (1995),

points out: “People can make their lives better or worse but what they think, how they feel

and what they do are strongly shaped by the social contexts in which they live”.

Rewards of teaching

Various rewards of teaching have been identified that impacts strongly on job satisfaction and

subsequently teacher retention in the educational sphere. Though varying dimensions exist in

the typologies of these rewards, they can broadly classified as being intrinsic/ primary

Page 4: The Role of Job Satisfaction in Employee Retention among Senior

European Journal of Education and Learning, Vol.54, 2008

ISSN(paper)2668-3318 ISSN(online)2668-361X

www.BellPress.org

12

rewards or secondary rewards. Miller et al (1999) cautions however that these rewards as

identified below may accrue to experienced and trained professional teacher rather than all

teachers as a whole in addition to the traditional financial and economic rewards of the

teaching profession.

Intrinsic or Primary Rewards

Studies of the satisfaction of grade school and high school teachers conclude that the joy of

teaching comes from intrinsic rewards such as helping students learn, seeing their successes,

and making a difference in their lives (Plihal, 1982). Observing the outcomes of teaching

therefore satisfies teachers’ altruistic need to contribute to society, and interacting with

students, in itself, also brings great satisfaction. These intrinsic rewards are central for those

who persevere as teachers and critical to preventing job stress and burnout. It is important to

note that individual teachers differ in their interest in teaching and in the enjoyment it brings

them. While some find little joy in teaching, for others, it is the most rewarding aspect of their

work. For some teachers, the primary rewards of teaching may substitute for their loss of

satisfaction in the conditions of service. Kirz and Larsen in their study of the impact of

teaching made known that 73.7% of respondents were still teaching because of the pleasure or

interest they gained from teaching.

Secondary rewards

Teaching may bring a number of other benefits to teachers at the senior high school level. In

the first instance, Foley et al (1996) recount that teachers may feel a renewed sense of the

importance of their work. They explain that without receiving feedback from learners,

teachers often have no mirror in which to view their work therefore many become lost in the

day-to-day tasks of changing pupil behaviour. By watching and listening to themselves as

they interact with students and through feedback from students however, teachers again see

the depth of their knowledge and experience and the contributions they make to people's lives.

Secondly, working with learners may help teachers keep abreast of changes in their areas of

competence thereby enhancing the intellectual stimulation of their job. This view sees

teaching is a powerful motivator for learning as teachers may bring to the learner-educator

relationship, knowledge and perspectives they have acquired during their training. They may

also serve as a constructive and accepted link between community values and academic

ideals. Thirdly, teachers may enjoy the presence of pupils in their numbers in their

classrooms. They may gain confidence in their teaching skills as more and more pupils are put

under their tutelage. Even in some communities, educational facilities have marketed the

teaching roles and depth of their staff to attract pupils. Teachers may even feel empowered by

the opportunity to help students learn, which in turn may bring a new level of trust and

collegiality between themselves and their students. They may also appreciate the opportunity

to contribute to the education of future leaders, adding interest and perceived value to their

jobs.

Career satisfaction and dissatisfaction

Career satisfaction and motivation are two concepts which are often, understandably,

somewhat confused. Generally, motivation according to Nadler and Lawler (1991) is taken to

mean a stimulus for behaviour and action in the light of a particular context, while satisfaction

- and indeed dissatisfaction - is usually taken to mean a product of behaviour and action in the

light of a particular context or environment. However, both phenomena are inextricably linked

through the influence each has on the other. Herzberg, for example, while identifying lower

order needs (“hygiene factors”) and higher order needs (“motivators”), was also concerned

Page 5: The Role of Job Satisfaction in Employee Retention among Senior

European Journal of Education and Learning, Vol.54, 2008

ISSN(paper)2668-3318 ISSN(online)2668-361X

www.BellPress.org

13

with satisfactions and dissatisfactions flowing from these and the need to strengthen

motivators in order to engender long term career satisfaction.

Despite the distinction made above, there exist in the teaching field, an argument on career

motivation and satisfaction, including the debate over extrinsic versus intrinsic motivation

(see Owens, 1995) and the influence of satisfiers and dissatisfiers by writers ostensibly

labeled as “motivation” theorists. Dinham (1995) in relation to the above revealed in an study

involving resigned teachers that the factors contributing to teacher satisfaction were largely

discrete from those contributing to teacher dissatisfaction, and that when teachers made the

decision to resign, the sources and strength of their satisfiers were basically unchanged, while

it was the increase in the strength of their dissatisfiers that had “tipped the balance” and

precipitated the “resignation decision”. Overwhelmingly, “satisfiers” were phenomena and

rewards “intrinsic” to teaching, such as pupil achievement, teacher achievement, changing

pupil attitudes and behaviours in a positive way, recognition from others, mastery and self-

growth, and positive relationships. Satisfiers were largely universal across sex, teaching

experience, position held, location, and type of school.

“Dissatisfiers”, on the other hand, were phenomena more “extrinsic” to the teaching of

students and included impacts of changes to educational policies and procedures, greater

expectations on schools to deal with and solve social problems, the declining status of

teachers in society, poor supervision, being treated impersonally by employers, new

responsibilities for schools and increased administrative workloads. In short, dissatisfiers

were phenomena perceived as detracting from or militating against the “core business” of

teaching students. Dinham also brought to light that the relative strength of teachers’

dissatisfiers had increased over time due to social and educational change, and that “control”

was a key issue, in that in many cases, imposed changes impacting on schools had to be

implemented with little room for discretion on the part of principals and teachers and with

little practical help from above, with resultant dissatisfaction. There was thus a direct causal

link between increased dissatisfaction and increased stress.

Luthans (2002) commenting on Dinham’s study elucidates that such a “two factor” model of

teacher satisfaction is broadly consistent with earlier findings of Herzberg et al. (1959),

Sergiovanni (1967), and the work of Schmidt (1976) and others, although what is perhaps

novel in the resignation study findings is the relative “quarantining” or insulation of teacher

satisfiers and satisfaction strength from the effects of change, and the impact of change on

dissatisfiers, which are more dynamic both in form and strength and which were found to

respond to changes occurring within education systems and society generally.

Determinants of teacher satisfaction

It is evident that levels of job satisfaction felt by teachers in similar work environments can

vary from one individual to another. Demographic factors may play a role in the level of job

satisfaction perceived by teachers (Bogler, 2002). In particular, literature suggests four

variables that may have significant interactions with teacher job satisfaction, namely; gender,

age, experience/tenure and position. Various studies conducted on the determinants or

measures of satisfaction have also concluded that while experienced teachers in particular

may be vulnerable to job dissatisfaction and subsequent intention to leave the profession

(Ramsey, 2000), younger teachers on the other hand will often face more challenges in their

role due to limited experience and the fact that teaching skills develop over time will

challenge their self confidence and influence their attitudes to the job.

Page 6: The Role of Job Satisfaction in Employee Retention among Senior

European Journal of Education and Learning, Vol.54, 2008

ISSN(paper)2668-3318 ISSN(online)2668-361X

www.BellPress.org

14

There are however other factors which strongly determine the level of satisfaction enjoyed by

teachers from their work which though significant in developing countries, have not been

deeply examined. The study shall thus focus on three of such measures of satisfaction as

identified by De Nobile and McCormick (2006) which determines whether teachers perceive

teaching as their ideal profession, whether teachers want to change their profession, and

whether teachers are satisfied with the local education bureau. These factors are community

factors (teachers are more satisfied in communities with greater economic and social

resources, and in communities that are less remote); school environment (Teachers are more

satisfied in schools with better economic resources, in larger schools, in schools where there

are more opportunities for professional advancement, and in schools where there is an

organizational climate that supports teacher collaboration); and Teacher background (Young

teachers, male teachers and teachers with greater human capital are less satisfied, while

teachers who are more socially similar to the local community are more satisfied).

Theoretical Framework

A feature of the conceptualization of career satisfaction in the literature is the role that ‘need

fulfillment’ plays in satisfaction, something which connects with the well known motivation

work of Maslow (1970) and Alderfer (1972). According to this view, job satisfaction is an

indicator of the degree of need fulfillment experienced by an individual.

A further feature of the literature on career satisfaction is the view that satisfaction is a

dynamic construct which equates to how an individual feels about his or her job. The presence

or absence of certain factors will influence the global satisfaction one experiences. This view

derives from Herzberg’s work, and tends to group those factors influencing job satisfaction

into two broad domains: intrinsic matters “built” into the nature of the work itself, such as

achievement, which tend to promote satisfaction; and matters more extrinsic to the central

purpose of the worker and job, such as poor working conditions, which tend to result in

dissatisfaction through their presence, but do not result in an increase in job satisfaction when

they are absent. Another way of expressing this view is that it rejects the notion that factors

giving rise to teacher satisfaction and teacher dissatisfaction are arranged along the same

continuum.

To better understand employee attitudes and motivation, Frederick Herzberg performed

studies to determine which factors in an employee's work environment caused satisfaction or

dissatisfaction. He published his findings in the 1959 book The Motivation to Work. The

studies included interviews in which employees where asked what pleased and displeased

them about their work. Herzberg found that the factors causing job satisfaction (and

presumably motivation) were different from those causing job dissatisfaction. He therefore

developed the motivation-hygiene theory to explain these results. He called the satisfiers

motivators and the dissatisfiers hygiene factors, using the term "hygiene" in the sense that

they are considered maintenance factors that are necessary to avoid dissatisfaction but that by

themselves do not provide satisfaction. Table 1 presents the top six factors causing

dissatisfaction and the top six factors causing satisfaction, listed in the order of higher to

lower importance.

Herzberg reasoned that because the factors causing satisfaction are different from those

causing dissatisfaction, the two feelings cannot simply be treated as opposites of one another.

The opposite of satisfaction is not dissatisfaction, but rather, no satisfaction. Similarly, the

Page 7: The Role of Job Satisfaction in Employee Retention among Senior

European Journal of Education and Learning, Vol.54, 2008

ISSN(paper)2668-3318 ISSN(online)2668-361X

www.BellPress.org

15

opposite of dissatisfaction is no dissatisfaction. While at first glance this distinction between

the two opposites may sound like a play on words, Herzberg argued that there are two distinct

human needs portrayed. First, there are physiological needs that can be fulfilled by money, for

example, to purchase food and shelter. Second, there is the psychological need to achieve and

grow, and this need is fulfilled by activities that cause one to grow.

From the above table of results, one observes that the factors that determine whether there is

dissatisfaction or no dissatisfaction are not part of the work itself, but rather, are external

factors. Herzberg often referred to these hygiene factors as the process of providing incentives

or a threat of punishment to cause someone to do something. Herzberg argues that these

provide only short-run success because the motivator factors that determine whether there is

satisfaction or no satisfaction are intrinsic to the job itself, and do not result from carrot and

stick incentives.

A replication of Herzberg’s work with 71 teachers by Sergiovanni (1967) and an interview

study with 57 resigned teachers by Dinham (1992) are two examples of research confirming

this “two factor” theory of teacher career satisfaction, whereby the factors giving rise to

satisfaction and dissatisfaction are largely mutually exclusive. In both studies cited above,

responses from subgroups tended not to differ, with intrinsic aspects of teaching such as

student achievement and teacher self-growth found to be uniformly satisfying, while extrinsic

factors such as poor interpersonal relations and administrative responsibilities were found to

be uniformly dissatisfying. While there have been criticisms of Herzberg’s “two factor

theory” of job satisfaction-dissatisfaction, it has been widely accepted and applied to the study

and management of organisations. Owens (1995) sums up the relevance of the concerns raised

in Herzberg’s work, in his conclusion that “Herzberg’s research - after exhaustive review in

the literature over a period of two decades - must be accepted as representing the state of the

art”.

Herzberg’s “two factor theory” and work derived from it, in lieu of the above, formed an

important basis of the study outlined in this paper. This is because the study assumes that the

factors to be considered in improving job satisfaction of teachers in the Asuogyaman District

are two-fold as prescribed by Herzberg. The first one relates to the physiological needs that

can be fulfilled by money, for example, to purchase food and shelter. Secondly, there is the

psychological need to achieve and grow, and this need is fulfilled by activities that cause one

to grow, for example, recognition and opportunities for advancement.

Job satisfaction

Questions under this section were aimed at finding out the knowledge and level of

understanding of the respondents concerning the object of the research. It also embodies an

exposé of job satisfaction with specific reference to the Asuogyaman district as well as an

attempt to find out respondents’ perception of the nature of relationship between job

satisfaction and teacher retention in the district. Responses provided are summarised in table

2.

Issues of teacher satisfaction have been heightened in recent times by the various actions and

pressures being initiated by unionized teachers (both Ghana National Association of Teachers

and the National Association of Graduate Teachers). Also poor performance of students and

pupils in the West African Senior Secondary School Certificate Examinations (WASSCE) and

Basic Education and Certificate Examination (BECE) especially in rural and peri-urban areas

Page 8: The Role of Job Satisfaction in Employee Retention among Senior

European Journal of Education and Learning, Vol.54, 2008

ISSN(paper)2668-3318 ISSN(online)2668-361X

www.BellPress.org

16

have been attributed to lack of facilities and teacher dissatisfaction. Another major issue that

may be linked to the creation of awareness on issues of job satisfaction is the Single Spine

Salary Scheme.

Basing on Ramsey’s (2000) account that career satisfaction is a dynamic construct which

equates to how an individual feels about his or her job and is thus not likely to be same among

persons, respondents were asked if they were individually satisfied with their work. In

response, 30% of respondents answered in the affirmative while 49% of respondents

answered in the negative. The remaining 21% indicated that they were partly satisfied with

their jobs. Though it may seem alarming that as much as 49% of respondents were not

satisfied with the jobs, this result is far more encouraging than results of other studies

conducted in similar environments1 which produced higher percentages of teachers in rural

areas not satisfied with their jobs. To provide a better understanding of their answers provided

in relation to whether or not they were satisfied with their work, respondents were asked to

identify what satisfied or dissatisfied them about their work. While Job satisfaction has been

described as favourable or positive feelings about work or the work environment, job

dissatisfaction has been conversely defined as unhappy or negative feelings about work or the

work environment (Furnham, 1997).

Respondents who had earlier on indicated that they were satisfied with their work pointed out

that the favourable or positive feelings about the work and work environment included the

recognition and respect accorded to them by community members, imparting knowledge to

children, opportunities for further development, the fact that they had relatively more time to

pursue other activities because of their relatively flexible work schedules as well as the

relatively low cost of living in their community. This is consistent with Dinham and Scott

(2002) who identify international trends relating and pointing to the fact that teachers are most

satisfied by matters intrinsic to the role of teaching: student achievement, helping students,

positive relationships with students and others, self growth and so on.

On the other hand, respondents who were not satisfied with their work identified the factors

that made them unhappy or led to negative feelings about their work and work environment as

unfavourable government and Ghana Education service policies, their conditions of service

and remuneration. The responses derived here are in line with the results of similar studies

conducted by Sergiovanni (1967) and Dinham (1992). However, appear contradictory to

Herzberg’s (1959) stance that factors that make teacher unsatisfied with their work have more

to do with Psychological needs (the need to achieve and grow) than by physiological needs

that can be fulfilled by money. Respondents who were partly satisfied in sum provided that

though their work and work environment was not bad, they believed they could have gotten

more favourable conditions of service in other professions. Others were satisfied with the

work environment which in their view was conducive but were not satisfied with their work

which they felt was under appreciated.

Interestingly, in answering why they were satisfied or dissatisfied with the factors identified

above, two contrasting opinions were held by respondents. While respondents who were

satisfied believed that given the current circumstances, the educational sector was doing its

best to motivate teachers and all efforts were being made to further enhance the sector, the

greater portion of respondents believed that they partial or full dissatisfaction stemmed from

the fact that little was being done for teachers in comparison to other professionals though

they believed that the government and other stakeholders were in a position to enhance job

Page 9: The Role of Job Satisfaction in Employee Retention among Senior

European Journal of Education and Learning, Vol.54, 2008

ISSN(paper)2668-3318 ISSN(online)2668-361X

www.BellPress.org

17

satisfaction among teachers.

Evidence from the literature provides a direct relationship between job satisfaction and

teacher retention. Specifically, Shann (1998) and Lumsden (1998) identified the some factors

which contribute to increased teacher dissatisfaction and to teachers leaving the profession.

They further found these factors which include problems/frustrations with the variety of

administrative routines and accompanying paperwork; poor communication channels; low

pay; few possibilities for career promotion or growth; and the declining respect for the

profession to be highly present in rural settings than urban ones. All respondents in

confirmation of the above agreed without reservations that indeed there was a relationship

between job satisfaction and teacher retention in their respective schools.

In reflection of the above only 13% of respondents admitted that they would not leave the

teaching profession if they had other resourceful opportunities with the remaining 87%

strongly asserting that they would leave the profession without second thoughts. These

responses when considered, seriously holds dire consequences for the educational sector in

Ghana and has points to the kind of future the educational sector will have if prompt actions

are not taken to resolve the issues of teacher dissatisfaction in Ghana.

Determinants of job satisfaction

This section of the analyses is dedicated to assessing the determinants of job satisfaction

among teachers within the Asuogyaman district as a precursor to identifying measures for

enhancing job satisfaction among teachers and subsequently teacher retention within the

district. This is based on Bogler’s (2002) account that the levels of job satisfaction felt by

teachers in similar work environments can vary from one individual to another with

demographic factors playing a major role in the level of job satisfaction perceived by teachers.

The perceptions of respondents were thus assessed based on measures of satisfaction in

developing countries proposed by De Nobile and McCormick (2006) which determines

whether teachers perceive teaching as their ideal profession, whether teachers want to change

their profession, and whether teachers are satisfied with the local education bureau.

Community factors

The first of these factors identified by De Nobile and McCormick (2006) are community

factors. In their view such factors which center on the community within which the teacher

resides and works is a principal determinant of his satisfaction and subsequent retention.

Thus, teachers are more satisfied in communities with greater economic and social resources,

and in communities that are less remote. Most of the respondents believed that their

satisfaction with their current jobs was in some way influenced by community factors. Only

8% saw no link between their satisfaction and the community they worked in.

The study further went to assess how some specific community indicators influenced the

satisfaction levels of teachers within the Asuogyaman District. Firstly respondents were asked

to indicate what their level of motivation will be if they were working in an area with fewer

economic resources. Economic resources in simple terms refer to the factors needed to engage

in productive, profit-making activities. These factors include but are not limited to markets,

arable or mineral rich land, labour in their right quantity and with the right skills, both fixed

and/or current capital which are needed to produce goods and services for a fee. Ultimately,

because these factors are needed for productivity in the community, their absence according to

Page 10: The Role of Job Satisfaction in Employee Retention among Senior

European Journal of Education and Learning, Vol.54, 2008

ISSN(paper)2668-3318 ISSN(online)2668-361X

www.BellPress.org

18

De Nobile and McCormick (2006) creates a community poverty situation.

Though these factors have not been established as direct determinants of job satisfaction, they

have been identified as complementary factors and also as key basis for choosing, settling or

leaving communities (Appiah-Agyekum, 2006). Ideally, teachers will therefore be influenced

to remain in communities with higher economic resources than in communities with lower

economic resources. This was supported by the fact that 21% of respondents said they would

be dissatisfied and 52% said they would be very dissatisfied in a community with fewer

economic resources.

An even greater percentage of workers expressed that they will be dissatisfied (45%) or very

dissatisfied (44%) working in areas where revenues are low and work opportunities are few.

As evident from the responses derived earlier, most teachers in Ghana perceive their

remuneration as being inadequate and unsatisfying. Communities with opportunities for extra-

curricular activities and a relatively high level of income will thus influence teachers in their

decisions to stay or leave a particular community or even leave the profession. Such

communities are those that offer teachers the opportunity to do part-time classes of other part-

time services after school, on weekends or during vacation.

The presence of work opportunities as a determinant of teacher satisfaction becomes more

relevant when consideration is given to the fact that the teacher in making his decision to stay

will consider the options that favour not only himself but his spouse. They will thus be willing

to live in community that offers work opportunities and relatively high revenue to their

spouses and other dependents than in those that do not. The debate on whether small

population size is a positive or negative influence on job satisfaction of teachers is ongoing

with varying reasons provided by both sides. While proponents of the view that small

population size rather leads to high job satisfaction support their arguments with the fact that

teachers in such communities are closely bonded, known, recognized, encouraged and have a

personal relationship with the community members opponents to this view think the contrary.

Rather they suggest that teachers feel no drive to excel in such small communities and may

not have the necessary socio-economic factors they need within the community. Further,

concerns of the effects of such communities on the family of the teacher result in lower job

satisfaction.

Though the division along these lines may account for the 13% of respondents who said they

will be satisfied in a small community, there is doubt in literature on the influence living in a

remote community where connections to the outside world are limited will has on job

satisfaction of teachers. Especially in this era of globalization and urbanization, such

conditions present strong dissatisfying situations for teachers who resist vehemently postings

to such areas. It is however paradoxical when the above is assessed against the background

that a good number of Ghanaian communities are predominantly rural and are limited in

connectivity to the outside world.

On what their level of satisfaction will be in a community with limited social resources, 19%

of respondents said they would be dissatisfied while 81% of respondents said they would be

very dissatisfied. Social resources, as used here simply refer to the social amenities and

infrastructure necessary for living in a modern day world. Notable social amenities considered

by Ghanaian include the presence of potable water, electricity, effective transportation

Page 11: The Role of Job Satisfaction in Employee Retention among Senior

European Journal of Education and Learning, Vol.54, 2008

ISSN(paper)2668-3318 ISSN(online)2668-361X

www.BellPress.org

19

networks, education and health facilities, effective communications networks, social

amenities like KVIPs and others. These factors become dissatisfiers to teachers who will in

effect be unwilling to work since it will be unbearably difficult for them and/or their families

to live and work in a community without these resources.

The level of education of the community also influences whether teachers will be satisfied

working there and will in effect be retained in the community. However, responses derived on

this question provide mixed values on whether this factor leads to satisfaction of

dissatisfaction. In a follow up question, the 11% and 48% of respondents who were very

satisfied and satisfied respectively shared that such communities will provide them the

challenge that will motivate them to put in more effort. They also explained that such a

community will further provide them the satisfaction of knowing that they a making a positive

contribution to a community that really needs their services. The 18% (8% dissatisfied and

10% very dissatisfied) who held the contrary opinion believed that such communities held

little appreciation for schools and will give them little standards for self-evaluation and

performance appraisal.

The remaining 33% who were not sure what their level of satisfaction would be in the follow

up question provided among others that it will be clear to point out whether they will be

satisfied or not without recourse to the attitudes of community members to education.

Specifically, some identified that they had been satisfied in teaching in poorly educated

communities which realized and appreciated the need to educate their young ones and

dissatisfied in other poorly educated communities which placed no premium on education.

Given the fact that the community is a major stakeholder in education and must provide the

complementary services needed to augment government efforts in the education sector, strong

community school linkages are a major determinant of teacher satisfaction especially in rural

areas where governmental efforts are shallow and community efforts very necessary. This

might explain why all respondents indicated that they will be very dissatisfied (73%) and

dissatisfied (27%) in a community with weak linkages to schools.

School factors

The second determinant of teacher satisfaction is identified by De Nobile and McCormick

(2006) as school factors. In their view, teachers are more satisfied in schools with better

economic resources, in larger schools, in schools where there are more opportunities for

professional advancement, and in schools where there is an organizational climate that

supports teacher collaboration.

Ingersoll (2001) and Lee and Dedrick (1991) concluded at the end of their respective studies

that school size was positively associated with teacher satisfaction (i.e. larger schools tend to

have a higher proportion of satisfied teachers). However, answers from respondents presents

the contrary with much more teachers expressing that they would be satisfied (41%) and very

satisfied (31%) in a small sized school. Respondents in justification of their answer provided

that small school size meant small class size and in effect small work load. They will

therefore be able to adequately handle and the limited number with relative ease than they

would have done for a large school size. The differences in the results from this study and that

conducted by Ingersoll (2001); and Lee and Dedrick (1991) does not present two contrasting

views but rather goes to buttress the situational context of job satisfaction which provides that

teachers in different constructs will be have different shades of satisfaction even on the same

elements.

Page 12: The Role of Job Satisfaction in Employee Retention among Senior

European Journal of Education and Learning, Vol.54, 2008

ISSN(paper)2668-3318 ISSN(online)2668-361X

www.BellPress.org

20

Motivation theorists have identified opportunities for personal development as a major

predictor of employee motivation and to a large extent job satisfaction and retention. These

theorists maintain that employees, being economical beings, would always want to maximize

their benefits and will do anything in line with the maximization of these benefits. Thus

employees who are provided opportunities for professional development in addition to their

remuneration are more likely to work harder and stay on longer since such opportunities aside

maximizing the benefits derived by the employee from the organization also enhances the

knowledge, skills and abilities of the employee and prepares him for greater occupational

challenges. It is therefore not surprising that all respondents (100%) unanimously identified

that their level of satisfaction will be very high in schools which offer them opportunities for

professional development.

Organizational climate that supports teacher collaboration has also been linked to higher

levels of teacher satisfaction in the developing world. Such climates that support teacher

collaborations include collaborations stressing on norms of continuous improvement;

collegiality and professional interactions among the staff and administrative support for

teaching in the form of mechanisms of teacher induction and organizational socialization,

such as internships and mentoring programs.

Though evident in many other countries at the high school level, such collaborations are

rather evident in Ghana at the tertiary level where lecturers collaborate in research and other

academic exercises than at the senior high school level. This may explain why no clear choice

is made on this issue and majority of respondents claimed they were not sure (47%).

However, such climates ideally provide a sense of security and support and thus motivate

teachers.

Just as all respondents (100%) expressed that they would be very dissatisfied in communities

with poor social and economic resources, respondents unanimously pointed out that schools

with poor socio-economic resources were a negative influence on the level of ob satisfaction

and subsequent retention. Evidence from the literature strongly supports this and recognizes

the inherent challenges faced by teachers in such facilities where socio-economic resources

are lacking, are inadequate or mismanaged. On the ground however, most facilities in rural

and most peri-urban areas in Ghana fall in the category of facilities with little socio-economic

resources – a situation that results in shortage of teachers in these facilities. In the developing

countries, poor salary is one of the most important reasons for leaving teaching in urban and

high-poverty public schools (Perie, Baker, & Whitener, 1997). Schlechty and Vance (1983)

also propose that low salaries and truncated salary scales are among the main reasons that the

most academically able—those with alternative career options—leave teaching.

Thus, not only is the quantum of remuneration an issue but also the reliability of the

remuneration. Especially, in the developing world where the volatile economic conditions,

dysfunctional bureaucracy and resource constraints continually challenge the human resource

management in the public sector, the tendency for the salaries of teachers to be delayed is

almost becoming a norm. Teachers though will be dissatisfied with the low level of

remuneration they receive, will be even more dissatisfied if their meager salaries are not

consistent. This was strongly supported by all respondents in this study.

Characteristics of the teacher

The final determinant of teacher satisfaction is identified by De Nobile and McCormick

Page 13: The Role of Job Satisfaction in Employee Retention among Senior

European Journal of Education and Learning, Vol.54, 2008

ISSN(paper)2668-3318 ISSN(online)2668-361X

www.BellPress.org

21

(2006) as teacher characteristics. In their view, young teachers, male teachers and teachers

with greater human capital are less satisfied, while teachers who are more socially similar to

the local community are more satisfied. In the United States and later in developing countries,

a number of background attributes of teachers themselves have been found to be linked to

levels of satisfaction which raises concerns on the influence of demographic factors. These

factors until recently were overlooked as more attention was being paid to the environment

within which the teachers worked. However, the characteristics of the individual teacher have

been proved in research to be another major determinant of whether he will be satisfied or

dissatisfied with teaching.

Though young teachers have been shown to be more dissatisfied and therefore more likely to

leave than older teachers in the USA and other countries of its ilk, (Ingersoll, 2001; Perie et al,

1997), they caution however that this situation might not necessarily be the case in developing

countries. Nevertheless, the situation in Ghana as presented by this study shows a stunning

similarity with the results of Ingersoll; and Perie et al. A cursory glance at the young teachers

in Ghana will unearth that most got into the profession because there was no other alternative

for advancement after secondary education. Such persons are thus more likely to leave the

profession in search of other more attractive careers. Additionally, most young persons

especially those in rural Ghana are unlikely to remain there for long periods since they may

not want to waste their youth in a village. However, the opposite is mostly true for old

teachers who are more likely to stay as they have reached the peak or twilight of their careers.

In addition, women have been generally found to be more satisfied than men (Ma &

MacMillan, 1999). 54% and 23% of respondents in semblance of this fact opined that men

were dissatisfied and very dissatisfied by teaching than women respectively. In the peculiar

Ghanaian environment and considering the relatively low level of remuneration and delays in

payments associated with teaching in public educational facilities, men, the traditional bread-

winners are less likely to be satisfied with teaching than women who traditionally have the

motherly aura to train and educate children.

Also, better qualified teachers tend to be more dissatisfied than less qualified teachers and

thus more likely to leave teaching (Darling-Hammond, 1984; Schlechty & Vance, 1983). This

was also supported by this study with as much as 54% and 23% of respondents proposing

respectively that teachers who are better educated will be dissatisfied and very dissatisfied

with teaching. This finding may be in part attributable to the fact that teachers with better

qualifications perceive more alternative opportunities and may think that they are missing out

on the conditions enjoyed by the their colleagues of similar qualifications in the non-

educational sectors. The same was also true for teachers in communities similar to their

backgrounds with a total of 68% of respondents pointing that such persons will have high

satisfaction levels because they will easily blend and find a place in the community and thus

feel accepted rather than an outsider. As expected majority of respondents (93%) believed that

the answers they provided for this section were not immutable but would change in the

positive direction if efforts were made at enhancing their job satisfaction.

4.5 Improving job satisfaction

This section of the study was purposed at assessing the existing strategies for enhancing job

satisfaction and retention of senior high school teachers in the Asuogyaman district and

against that background, prescribe was of enhancing job satisfaction in the district.

Respondents were firstly required to identify whether or not there were some strategies in

place for enhancing job satisfaction among teachers in the district. In their response, majority

Page 14: The Role of Job Satisfaction in Employee Retention among Senior

European Journal of Education and Learning, Vol.54, 2008

ISSN(paper)2668-3318 ISSN(online)2668-361X

www.BellPress.org

22

of respondents agreed without reservations that indeed there were some strategies for

enhancing job satisfaction of teachers2. When asked to identify what components were in the

strategy, respondents identified bonuses, study leave, access to loans, accommodation,

training and development opportunities and recognition.

The issue of job satisfaction in the district to a large extent was therefore not the fact that

teachers had low job satisfaction because of the lack of strategies to enhance job satisfaction

but rather that the strategies were not adequate or evenly distributed. Specifically, respondents

believed that although there was some form of remuneration, it was not commensurate with

the required job done. Further, when the remuneration provided was compared with that of

other persons with similar qualifications in other sectors of the economy that of senior high

school teachers fell woefully short. Therefore more needs to be done if remuneration is to be

used effectively as a tool to enhance job satisfaction.

Additionally, respondents intimated that though opportunities for further development were

sometimes made available to employees through the granting of study leave, the cost of such

development was borne by the teacher as it was becoming increasing difficult to get study

leave with pay. Additionally, teachers on study leave were sometimes not paid and sometimes

not even guaranteed re-appointment after their course. Teachers were thus not motivated by

these opportunities because of the cost implications. Respondents therefore believed that

effective motivation through the use of opportunities for further development must be handled

such that study leave was paid for by the education service either in full or in part. Further,

scholarships must be made available to teachers to encourage them to develop themselves.

Respondents also provided that their satisfaction with their jobs will be better enhanced if

adequate accommodation was provided, more access to loans was facilitated and all bonuses

enjoyed by their counterparts in the private educational sector was extended to them.

Further recognition for all categories of teachers and effective but respectful communication

in their view could motivate workers to put in the extra effort rather than head teachers

ordering teachers about and treating them with officiousness. Importantly, respondents

identified that the local communities, parents and the district assembly pay more attention to

educational matters and complement the efforts of government in the industry. Adequate

accommodation and staff common rooms, tools and materials, socio-economic resources and

other accoutrements needed by teachers and the entire school for effective teaching and

learning must be provided by these stakeholders to enhance the satisfaction of teachers and in

effect increase the retention rate of teachers in the district.

5.3 Recommendations

The study has been able to identify the determinants of job satisfaction of teachers in Ghana.

The study therefore recommends that particular attention be paid to enhancing the community

factors, teacher characteristics and the school factors as a means of ensuring that teachers are

satisfied with their jobs.

Though currently the Government of Ghana and the Ghana Education Service have put some

strategies in place to enhance the job satisfaction of teachers, these strategies are inadequate.

More attention must therefore be paid by local communities, NGOs, District Assemblies,

religious groups and other stakeholders in education to motivate teachers and ensure that they

are satisfied so as to positively influence their retention.

Additionally, the study unearthed that organizational climates that support teacher

collaboration was linked to higher levels of teacher satisfaction in the developing world. Such

Page 15: The Role of Job Satisfaction in Employee Retention among Senior

European Journal of Education and Learning, Vol.54, 2008

ISSN(paper)2668-3318 ISSN(online)2668-361X

www.BellPress.org

23

climates include collaborations stressing on norms of continuous improvement; collegiality

and professional interactions among the staff; and administrative support for teaching in the

form of mechanisms of teacher induction and organizational socialization, such as internships

and mentoring programs. However such collaborations were found to be virtually non-

existent among senior high school teachers. The study therefore recommends that more

attention be paid to all stakeholder of education especially teacher unions to building and

sustaining these collaborations.

Additionally, more attention must be paid to enhancing job satisfaction among Senior High

School teachers in the Asougyman District. Specifically, issues of housing, allowances and

study leaves must be immediately attended to since these issues influence the satisfaction of

the teachers and their subsequent retention in the district

The study also recommends that the existing policies on motivation for Senior High School

teachers must be reviewed. This stems from the study’s findings that though some policies

have been put in place to motivate teachers, these policies are not motivating enough. Policies

on pay, incentives and benefits as well as training and development opportunities must be

looked at critically The study also recommends that particular attention be paid to the

community factors, school factors and the characteristics of the teacher as a means of

enhancing the job satisfaction ad employee retention among SHS teachers in the district. This

is based on the study’s findings that community and school factors as well as the

characteristics of the individual are strong determinants of job satisfaction among SHS

teachers and in effect their retention.

The study also recommends that parents actively involve themselves in educational issues.

Instead of leaving the local and central government institutions to handle issues of teacher

motivation, they must however be actively involved in complementing the work of the

government agencies since their wards will be the ultimate losers if the teachers are

dissatisfied. The study also identified the paucity of empirical knowledge on the subject as a

major constraint to the study. The study therefore recommends that more studies be carried

out on the linkage between job satisfaction and teacher retention so as to provide concrete

assessments of job satisfaction. Further studies on the subject apart from unearthing the other

dimensions of job satisfaction among SHS teachers that was not covered by this study will

also provide the basis for evidence based practice.

5.4 Conclusion

The study has been able to assess the main issues of job satisfaction and its effect on

employee retention not only among teachers in the Asuogyaman district but indeed in all

districts in Ghana. The study has also been able to prescribe measures through which job

satisfaction and employee retention among teachers could be enhanced in Ghana.

References

Alderfer, C. (1972), Existence, Relatedness, and Growth: Human Needs in Organizational

Settings, Free Press, New York, NY

Appiah-Agyekum (2006), The impact of NGOs on decentralization and Local government in

Ghana – the GAIT II example, unpublished Long Essay, UGBS, PAHSM.

Page 16: The Role of Job Satisfaction in Employee Retention among Senior

European Journal of Education and Learning, Vol.54, 2008

ISSN(paper)2668-3318 ISSN(online)2668-361X

www.BellPress.org

24

Bishay, A. (1996), "Teacher motivation and job satisfaction: a study employing the experience

sampling method", Journal of Undergraduate Science, Vol. 3 pp.147-54

Blegen MA: job-satisfaction - A metaanalysis of related variables. Nursing Research 1993,

42(1):36-41.

Bogler, R. (2002). Two profiles of Schoolteachers: a discriminant analysis of job satisfaction.

Teaching and Teacher Eduction, 18, 665-673

Cherniss, C. (1995), Beyond Burnout: Helping Teachers, Nurses, Therapists and Lawyers

Recover from Stress and Disillusionment, Routledge, New York, NY.

Darling-Hammond, L. (1984). Beyond the Commission Reports: The Coming Crisis in

Teaching (R-3177-RC). Santa Monica, CA: Rand

Darling-Hammond, L. (1999) Solving the dilemmas of teacher supply, demand, and

standards: How we can ensure a competent, caring, and qualified teacher for every child. New

York: National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. [Available On-line:

http://www.tc.columbia.edu/~teachcomm/CONFERENCE-99/SOLVING/]

De Nobile, J. (2003). Organisational Communication, Job Satisfaction and Occupational

Stress in Catholic Primary Schools. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of New South

Wales, Sydney

De Nobile, J. J. and McCormick, J. (2005). Job Satisfaction and Occupational Stress in

Catholic Primary Schools. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Australian

Association for Research in Education, Sydney, Australia.

De Nobile and McCormick (2006), Biographical Differences and Job Satisfaction of Catholic

Primary School Staff, A paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Australian

Association for Research in Education, Adelaide, November 26-30, 2006.

Page 17: The Role of Job Satisfaction in Employee Retention among Senior

European Journal of Education and Learning, Vol.54, 2008

ISSN(paper)2668-3318 ISSN(online)2668-361X

www.BellPress.org

25

Dinham, S. (1992), "Human perspectives on the resignation of teachers from the New South

Wales public school system: towards a model of teacher persistence", University of New

England, Armidale, Australia., unpublished PhD thesis,

Dinham, S. (1995), "Time to focus on teacher satisfaction", Unicorn, Vol. 21 No.3, pp.64-75

Dinham, S., Scott, C. (1998), "A three domain model of teacher and school executive

satisfaction", Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 36 pp.362-78.

Dinham, S. and Scott, C. (1998). An International Comparative Study of Teacher Satisfaction,

Motivation and Health: Australia, England and New Zealand. Paper presented at the Annual

Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, April 13-17.

Dinham, S., Scott, C. (1999), "The relationship between context, type of school and position

held in school and occupational satisfaction, and mental stress", paper presented at the

Australian College of Education/Australian Council for Educational Administration, National

Conference, Darwin

Dinham, S., Scott, C. (2000), "Teachers' work and the growing influence of societal

expectations and pressures", paper presented at the American Educational Research

Association Annual Meeting, April, New Orleans, LA

Dinham, S., Scott, C. (2002), "The international Teacher 2000 Project: an international study

of teacher and school executive satisfaction, motivation and health in Australia, England,

USA, Malta and New Zealand", paper presented at the Challenging Futures Conference,

University of New England, Armidale

Evans, L. (2001), "Delving deeper into morale, job satisfaction and motivation among

education professionals: re-examining the leadership dimension", Educational Management

Administration, Vol. 29 pp.291-306.

Farber, B.A. (1991), Crisis in Education: Stress and Burnout in the American Teacher, Jossey-

Bass, San Francisco, CA,.

Page 18: The Role of Job Satisfaction in Employee Retention among Senior

European Journal of Education and Learning, Vol.54, 2008

ISSN(paper)2668-3318 ISSN(online)2668-361X

www.BellPress.org

26

Foley R, Yonke A, Smith J, Roe B, Vance J. (1996), Recruiting and retaining volunteer

community preceptors. Acad Med. ;71:460–3

Friedman, I.A., Farber, B.A. (1992), "Professional self-concept as a predictor of teacher

burnout", Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 86 pp.28-35.

Fuller, B. (1987). What School Factors Raise Achievement in the Third World? Review of

Educational Research, 57(3), 255-292

Furnham, A. (1997). The Psychology of Behaviour at Work. Hove: Psychology Press

Garrett, R.M. (1999), "Teacher job satisfaction in developing countries. Educational research

supplemental series (G)", No. ED 459 150, ERIC Document Reproduction Service

Hannum, E., & Park, A. (2003). Academic Achievement and Engagement in Rural

China.Unpublished manuscript

Hanushek, E. (1995). Interpreting Recent Research on Schools in Developing Countries.

World Bank Research Observer, 10, 227-246

Hargreaves, A. (1997), Positive Change for School Success: The 1997 ASCD Yearbook,

Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria, VA

Hayes LJ, O'Brien-Pallas L, Duffield C, Shamian J, Buchan J, Hughes F, Spence Laschinger

HK, North N, Stone PW: turnover: A literature review. International Journal of Nursing

Studies 2006, 43(2):237-263.

Henke, R. R., Choy, S. P., Chen, X., Geis, S., Alt, M. N., & Broughman, S. P. (1997).

America's teachers: Profile of a profession, 1993-94 (NCES 97-460). Washington, DC:

National Center for Educational Statistics. [Available On-line:

http://nces.ed.gov/pubs97/97460.pdf].

Holdaway, E.A. (1978), "Facet and overall satisfaction of teachers", Educational

Administration Quarterly, Vol. 14 No.1, pp.30-47.

Page 19: The Role of Job Satisfaction in Employee Retention among Senior

European Journal of Education and Learning, Vol.54, 2008

ISSN(paper)2668-3318 ISSN(online)2668-361X

www.BellPress.org

27

Ingersoll, R. M. (2001). Teacher Turnover and Teacher Shortages American Educational

Research Journal, 38(3), 499-534

Kirz HL, Larsen C. 1986, Costs and benefits of medical student training to a health

maintenance organization. JAMA; 256:734–9

Lawler, E.E. , III (1973), Motivation in Work Organizations, Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA

Lee, V. E., & Dedrick, R. F. (1991). The Effect of Social Organization of Schools on Teachers'

Efficacy and Satisfaction. Sociology of Education, 64(July), 190-208

Lloyd, C., Mensch, B., & Clark, W. (2000). The Effects of Primary School Quality on School

Dropout among Kenyan Girls and Boys. Comparative Education Review, 44(2), 113-147

Lu H, While AE, Barriball KL: Job satisfaction among teaching nurses: a literature review.

International Journal of Nursing Studies 2005, 42(2):211-227

Lumsden, L. (1998), "Teacher morale: ERIC Digest, Number 120", ERIC Document

Reproduction Service No. ED 422601

Luthans, F. (2002). Organizational Behavior (9th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill

Maeroff, G.I. (1988), The Empowerment of Teachers: Overcoming the Crisis of Confidence,

Teachers College Press, New York, NY

Ma, X., & MacMillan, R. (1999). Influences of Workplace Conditions on Teachers' Job

Satisfaction. Journal of Educational Research, 93(1), 39-47

Maslow, A. (1970), Motivation and Personality, 2nd ed, Harper & Row, New York

Miller, M. D., Brownell, M. T., & Smith, S. W. (1999). Factors that predict teachers staying

in, leaving, or transferring from the special education classroom. Exceptional Children, 65

(2), 201-218

Morse, N.C. (1953), Satisfaction in the White-Collar Job, Institute for Social Research,

Page 20: The Role of Job Satisfaction in Employee Retention among Senior

European Journal of Education and Learning, Vol.54, 2008

ISSN(paper)2668-3318 ISSN(online)2668-361X

www.BellPress.org

28

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, Survey Research Center

Mykletun, R.J. (1984), "Teacher stress: perceived and objective sources, and quality of life",

Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 28 pp.17-45

Nadler, D., Lawler, E. (1991), "Motivation: a diagnostic approach", in Kolb, D., Rubin, D.,

Osland, J. (Eds),The Organisational Behaviour Reader, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

Naylor, C. (2001), "Teacher workload and stress: an international perspective on human costs

and systemic failure", No. ED 464 028, ERIC Document Reproduction Service

Nias, J. (1996), "Thinking about feeling: The emotions in teaching", Cambridge Journal of

Education, Vol. 26 pp.293-306

Owens, R. (1995), Organizational Behavior in Education, Allyn and Bacon, Boston

Oulai, D. (1999). Decentralization and Financing of Education in Sub-Saharan Africa. In S.

Péano & I. V. Kitaev & D. Oulai & R. C. Noumon (Eds.), Financing and Financial

Management of Education. Paris: UNESCO & IIEP

Paine, L. (1998). Making Schools Modern: Paradoxes of Educational Reform. In A. Walder

(Ed.), Zouping in Transition: The Process of Reform in Rural North China. Cambridge, MA:

Harvard University Press.

Park, A., & Hannum, E. (2001). Do Teachers Affect Learning in Developing Countries? Paper

presented at the Rethinking Social Science Research on the Developing World in the 21st

Century, Social Science Research Council, Park City, Utah

Perie, M., Baker, D., & Whitener, S. (1997). Job Satisfaction Among America's Teachers:

Effects of Workplace Conditions, Background Characteristics, and Teacher Compensation.

Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education

Plihal, J. 1982. Types of intrinsic rewards of teaching and their relation to teacher

Page 21: The Role of Job Satisfaction in Employee Retention among Senior

European Journal of Education and Learning, Vol.54, 2008

ISSN(paper)2668-3318 ISSN(online)2668-361X

www.BellPress.org

29

characteristics and variables in the work setting; pp. 19–23. March. Presented at the annual

meeting of the American Educational Research Association New York, NY:

Ramsey, G. (2000). Quality Matters Revitalising teaching: Critical times critical choices.

Sydney: New South Wales Government

Roberts BJ, Jones C, Lynn M: Job satisfaction of new baccalaureate nursing teachers. Journal

of Nursing Administration 2004, 34(9):428-435

Rosenholtz, S. J. (1985). Effective Schools: Interpreting the Evidence. American Journal of

Education, 352-388

Rosenholtz, S.J. (1991), Teachers' Workplace: The Organization of Schools, Teachers College

Press, New York, NY,

Saunder el al (1997), Mark Research Methods for Business Students, Sage, US

Schlechty, P., & Vance, V. (1983). Recruitment, Selection and Retention: The Shape of the

Teaching Force. The Elementary School Journal, 83(4), 468-487.

Schmidt, G.L. (1976), "Job satisfaction among secondary school administrators", Educational

Administration Quarterly, Vol. 12 pp.68-86

Schools and Staffing Survey 1999-2000: Overview of the Data for Public, Private, and Public

Charter, and BIA Elementary and Secondary Schools

Sergiovanni, T. (1967), "Factors which affect satisfaction and dissatisfaction of teachers", The

Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 5 No.1, pp.66-81

Shann, M. (1998), "Professional commitment and satisfaction among teachers in urban middle

schools", The Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 92 pp.67-73

Singh, K. and Billingsley, B.S. (1996). Intent to Stay in Teaching: Teachers of Students with

Page 22: The Role of Job Satisfaction in Employee Retention among Senior

European Journal of Education and Learning, Vol.54, 2008

ISSN(paper)2668-3318 ISSN(online)2668-361X

www.BellPress.org

30

Emotional Disorders Versus Other Special Eductors, Remedial and Special Education , 17 (1),

37-47

Spear, M., Gould, K., Lee, B. (2000), Who Would be a Teacher? A Review of Factors

Motivating and Demotivating Prospective and Practising Teachers, NFER, Slough

Spector, P.E. (2000). Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Research and Practice (2nd

ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Stenlund, K.V. (1995), "Teacher perceptions across cultures: the impact of students on teacher

enthusiasm and discouragement in a cross-cultural context", The Alberta Journal of

Educational Research, Vol. 41 pp.145-61

Thomas, K.W., Velthouse, B.A. (1990), "Cognitive elements of empowerment: an

‘interpretive’ model of intrinsic task motivation", Academy of Management Review, Vol. 15

pp.666-81

Tsang, M. C. (1996). Financial Reform of Basic Education in China. Economics of Education

Review, 15(4), 423-444.

Ubom, I. U. (2001), Value orientations, needs satisfaction and job performance of public

servants in Akwa Ibom State. Ph. D. dissertation, University of Calabar, Calabar – Nigeria

US Department of Education (1997), Job Satisfaction Among America's Teachers: Effects of

Workplace Conditions, Background Characteristics, and Teacher Compensation, National

Center for Education Statistics, US Department of Education, Washington, DC, available at:

http://nces.ed.gov/pubs/ce/c9749a01.html

Van den Berg, R. (2002), "Teachers' meanings regarding educational practice", Review of

Educational Research, Vol. 72 pp.577-625

Notes

Note 1. see Foley et al, 1996.

Note 2. see table 4.3

Page 23: The Role of Job Satisfaction in Employee Retention among Senior

European Journal of Education and Learning, Vol.54, 2008

ISSN(paper)2668-3318 ISSN(online)2668-361X

www.BellPress.org

31

Tables

Table 1 Factors Affecting Job Attitudes

Leading to Dissatisfaction Leading to Satisfaction

• Company policy

• Supervision

• Relationship w/Boss

• Work conditions

• Salary

• Relationship w/Peers

• Achievement

• Recognition

• Work itself

• Responsibility

• Advancement

• Growth

Table 2 Summary of responses on job satisfaction

Questions Yes

(%)

No

(%)

Partly

(%)

Total

(%)

Are you satisfied with your work? 30 49 21 100

Is there a relationship between job satisfaction and teacher retention in your

school?

100 0 0 100

Will you leave the teaching profession if you had other resourceful opportunities? 81 13 6 100

Will you consider leaving the profession is you were dissatisfied? 89 0 11 100

Source: Field data 2010

Table 3 Whether there are strategies for enhancing job satisfaction

Frequency Percentage

Yes 41 55

No 23 31

Partly 11 14

Total 75 100

Source: Field data 2009