the role of gender in household decision making on tree...

1
RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © 2012 www.PosterPresentations.com When it comes to agroforestry, the role of the head of the household in decision making at household level has not been documented well. Increasingly, the traditional assumption that the senior male of the household functions as the household head and primary decision maker is being questioned. Increased understanding of household level decision making in relation to tree planting activities is needed to improve the effectiveness of agroforestry policies and projects. Introduction Methods Results (continued) The density of trees planted was significantly associated with the decision maker on tree planting within the household (P = 0.0062). The density of trees planted was lower for decision making by the household head alone compared to decision making by the spouse and joint decision making (Figure 2). The best fit model showed that the density of planted trees was significantly associated with kinship (P < 0.0001) and the decision maker on tree management (P = 0.04). The density of trees planted was higher for matrilineal households than for patrilineal households, and was highest for households where decisions on tree management were made jointly by the household head and their spouse (Figure 3). Gender of the household head was not significantly associated with the density of planted trees in any of our models. Conclusions The findings of this study demonstrate that the assumption that the household head is the sole decision maker is flawed and an oversimplification of reality. No clear pattern of household decision making emerged from our data on the various agricultural activities, which indicates that decision making is a complex process and cannot be reduced to a simple model. Gender of the household head and kinship affected who was the main decision maker within the household, and this in turn affected the density of trees planted by the household. Tree planting and management seem to be considered as mainly the responsibility of men in our study areas; however, it was also clear that joint decision makers with regards to tree planting and management were more successful in terms of the numbers of trees planted on their land. Acknowledgements and Contact This study was funded by Irish Aid and would not have been possible without supervision and assistance of the World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) and University College Dublin (UCD). Contact: Seline Meijer: [email protected] or [email protected] A household survey was administered to 135 married household heads in two rural districts in Malawi: 1. The northern district Mzimba, with mostly patrilineal kinship, where households reside in the village of the husband and the husband holds the land titles. 2. The southern district Chiradzulu, with mostly matrilineal kinship, where households reside in the village of the wife and the wife holds the land titles. Multinomial regression analyses were used to test the association of gender and kinship with who was the household decision maker and negative binomial regression analyses were used to see if the density of planted trees was associated with the decision maker on tree planting and tree management, kinship and gender. 1. World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Southern Africa Regional Programme, PO Box 30798, Lilongwe, Malawi 2. World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Vietnam, No. 8, Lot 13A, Trung Hoa Street, Yen Hoa Ward, Cau Giay District, Hanoi, Vietnam 3. UCD Forestry, Agriculture & Food Science Centre, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland Seline S. Meijer 1,3 , Delia Catacutan 2 , Gudeta W. Sileshi 1 & Maarten Nieuwenhuis 3 The role of gender in household decision making on tree planting: A case study from Malawi Figure 1. Map of study areas in Malawi Results The head of the household was most often the main decision maker for the various agricultural activities, while joint decision making by the husband and wife was also common (Table 1). Tree planting and tree management are different from other agricultural activities in that the percentage of cases where the household head decides independently was higher, and consequently joint decision making was lower. Decisions in relation to tree planting and management were made more often by the household head in patrilineal households, whereas joint decision making was more common in matrilineal households. In addition, decision making on tree planting was done more often by the household head in male-headed households than in female- headed households, where these decisions were more likely to be made jointly by the husband and wife together. Photo 1. Agroforestry farmer in Malawi Table 1. Household decision making patterns for various agricultural activities Figure 2. The density of planted trees for household decision maker on tree planting and kinship Figure 3. The density of planted trees for household decision maker on tree management and kinship Photo 2. Household survey in Malawi Activities Head (%) Spouse (%) Joint (%) N Crops to plant 50.0 10.4 39.6 134 Sowing 50.4 6.7 43.0 135 Weeding 47.4 7.5 45.1 135 Fertilizer 38.8 14.2 47.0 134 Trees to plant 66.7 7.4 25.9 134 Tree management 62.7 8.2 29.1 133 Animals to rear 51.9 12.6 35.6 135 Selling farm products 40.0 17.0 43.0 135 Credit 45.2 18.5 36.3 135 Participation in meetings 54.1 0.7 45.2 135 Firewood collection 27.4 61.5 11.1 135 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 Head Spouse Joint Matrilineal Patrilineal 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Head Spouse Joint Matrilineal Patrilineal This study aims to (i) identify which household members are the decision maker(s) for various agricultural activities including tree planting; and (ii) evaluate the outcomes of household decision making by the head, the spouse, or joint decision making, in terms of actual trees planted by farming households in two rural districts in Malawi. Research and extension efforts should not merely target the household head but should take into consideration that decision making in relation to farming and tree planting is multidimensional and site-specific. Assumptions on headship and gender roles need to be locally checked and validated in order for agroforestry research, policies and projects to be relevant and effective.

Upload: others

Post on 13-Aug-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The role of gender in household decision making on tree ...blog.worldagroforestry.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/... · This PowerPoint 2007 template produces a 91cmx122cm presentation

RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © 2012

www.PosterPresentations.com

(—THIS SIDEBAR DOES NOT PRINT—)

DESIGN GUIDE

This PowerPoint 2007 template produces a

91cmx122cm presentation poster. You can use it to

create your research poster and save valuable time

placing titles, subtitles, text, and graphics.

We provide a series of online tutorials that will guide

you through the poster design process and answer your

poster production questions. To view our template

tutorials, go online to PosterPresentations.com and

click on HELP DESK.

When you are ready to print your poster, go online to

PosterPresentations.com

Need assistance? Call us at 1.510.649.3001

QUICK START

Zoom in and out As you work on your poster zoom in and out to

the level that is more comfortable to you. Go

to VIEW > ZOOM.

Title, Authors, and Affiliations Start designing your poster by adding the title, the names of

the authors, and the affiliated institutions. You can type or

paste text into the provided boxes. The template will

automatically adjust the size of your text to fit the title box.

You can manually override this feature and change the size of

your text.

TIP: The font size of your title should be bigger than your

name(s) and institution name(s).

Adding Logos / Seals Most often, logos are added on each side of the title. You can

insert a logo by dragging and dropping it from your desktop,

copy and paste or by going to INSERT > PICTURES. Logos

taken from web sites are likely to be low quality when

printed. Zoom it at 100% to see what the logo will look like

on the final poster and make any necessary adjustments.

TIP: See if your school’s logo is available on our free poster

templates page.

Photographs / Graphics You can add images by dragging and dropping from your

desktop, copy and paste, or by going to INSERT > PICTURES.

Resize images proportionally by holding down the SHIFT key

and dragging one of the corner handles. For a professional-

looking poster, do not distort your images by enlarging them

disproportionally.

Image Quality Check Zoom in and look at your images at 100% magnification. If

they look good they will print well.

ORIGINAL DISTORTED Corner handles

Go

od

pri

nti

ng

qu

alit

y

Bad

pri

nti

ng

qu

alit

y

QUICK START (cont. )

How to change the template color theme You can easily change the color theme of your poster by going

to the DESIGN menu, click on COLORS, and choose the color

theme of your choice. You can also create your own color

theme.

You can also manually change the color of your background by

going to VIEW > SLIDE MASTER. After you finish working on

the master be sure to go to VIEW > NORMAL to continue

working on your poster.

How to add Text The template comes with a number of pre-

formatted placeholders for headers and

text blocks. You can add more blocks by

copying and pasting the existing ones or by

adding a text box from the HOME menu.

Text size Adjust the size of your text based on how much content you

have to present.

The default template text offers a good starting point. Follow

the conference requirements.

How to add Tables To add a table from scratch go to the INSERT menu

and click on TABLE. A drop-down box will help you

select rows and columns.

You can also copy and a paste a table from Word or another

PowerPoint document. A pasted table may need to be re-

formatted by RIGHT-CLICK > FORMAT SHAPE, TEXT BOX,

Margins.

Graphs / Charts You can simply copy and paste charts and graphs from Excel

or Word. Some reformatting may be required depending on

how the original document has been created.

How to change the column configuration RIGHT-CLICK on the poster background and select LAYOUT to

see the column options available for this template. The

poster columns can also be customized on the Master. VIEW >

MASTER.

How to remove the info bars If you are working in PowerPoint for Windows and have

finished your poster, save as PDF and the bars will not be

included. You can also delete them by going to VIEW >

MASTER. On the Mac adjust the Page-Setup to match the

Page-Setup in PowerPoint before you create a PDF. You can

also delete them from the Slide Master.

Save your work Save your template as a PowerPoint document. For printing,

save as PowerPoint of “Print-quality” PDF.

Print your poster When you are ready to have your poster printed go online to

PosterPresentations.com and click on the “Order Your Poster”

button. Choose the poster type the best suits your needs and

submit your order. If you submit a PowerPoint document you

will be receiving a PDF proof for your approval prior to

printing. If your order is placed and paid for before noon,

Pacific, Monday through Friday, your order will ship out that

same day. Next day, Second day, Third day, and Free Ground

services are offered. Go to PosterPresentations.com for more

information.

Student discounts are available on our Facebook page.

Go to PosterPresentations.com and click on the FB icon.

© 2013 PosterPresentations.com 2117 Fourth Street , Unit C Berkeley CA 94710

[email protected]

• When it comes to agroforestry, the role of the head of the household in decision

making at household level has not been documented well.

• Increasingly, the traditional assumption that the senior male of the household functions

as the household head and primary decision maker is being questioned.

• Increased understanding of household level decision making in relation to tree planting

activities is needed to improve the effectiveness of agroforestry policies and projects.

Introduction

Methods

Results (continued)

• The density of trees planted was significantly associated with the decision maker on

tree planting within the household (P = 0.0062).

• The density of trees planted was lower for decision making by the household head

alone compared to decision making by the spouse and joint decision making (Figure 2).

• The best fit model showed that the density of planted trees was significantly

associated with kinship (P < 0.0001) and the decision maker on tree management

(P = 0.04).

• The density of trees planted was higher for matrilineal households than for patrilineal

households, and was highest for households where decisions on tree management were

made jointly by the household head and their spouse (Figure 3).

• Gender of the household head was not significantly associated with the density of

planted trees in any of our models.

Conclusions

• The findings of this study demonstrate that the assumption that the household head is

the sole decision maker is flawed and an oversimplification of reality.

• No clear pattern of household decision making emerged from our data on the various

agricultural activities, which indicates that decision making is a complex process and

cannot be reduced to a simple model.

• Gender of the household head and kinship affected who was the main decision maker

within the household, and this in turn affected the density of trees planted by the

household.

• Tree planting and management seem to be considered as mainly the responsibility of

men in our study areas; however, it was also clear that joint decision makers with

regards to tree planting and management were more successful in terms of the

numbers of trees planted on their land.

Acknowledgements and Contact

• This study was funded by Irish Aid and would not have been possible without supervision

and assistance of the World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) and University College Dublin

(UCD).

• Contact: Seline Meijer: [email protected] or

[email protected]

• A household survey was administered to 135

married household heads in two rural districts in

Malawi:

1. The northern district Mzimba, with mostly

patrilineal kinship, where households

reside in the village of the husband and

the husband holds the land titles.

2. The southern district Chiradzulu, with

mostly matrilineal kinship, where

households reside in the village of the

wife and the wife holds the land titles.

• Multinomial regression analyses were used to test

the association of gender and kinship with who was

the household decision maker and negative

binomial regression analyses were used to see if the

density of planted trees was associated with the

decision maker on tree planting and tree

management, kinship and gender.

1. World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Southern Africa Regional Programme, PO Box 30798, Lilongwe, Malawi 2. World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) Vietnam, No. 8, Lot 13A, Trung Hoa Street, Yen Hoa Ward, Cau Giay District, Hanoi, Vietnam

3. UCD Forestry, Agriculture & Food Science Centre, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland

Seline S. Meijer1,3, Delia Catacutan2, Gudeta W. Sileshi1 & Maarten Nieuwenhuis3

The role of gender in household decision making on tree planting: A case study from Malawi

Figure 1. Map of study areas in Malawi

Results

• The head of the household was most often the main decision maker for the various

agricultural activities, while joint decision making by the husband and wife was also

common (Table 1).

• Tree planting and tree management are different from other agricultural activities in

that the percentage of cases where the household head decides independently was

higher, and consequently joint decision making was lower.

• Decisions in relation to tree planting and management were made more often by the

household head in patrilineal households, whereas joint decision making was more

common in matrilineal households. In addition, decision making on tree planting was

done more often by the household head in male-headed households than in female-

headed households, where these decisions were more likely to be made jointly by the

husband and wife together.

Photo 1. Agroforestry farmer in Malawi

Table 1. Household decision making patterns for various agricultural activities

Figure 2. The density of planted trees for household

decision maker on tree planting and kinship Figure 3. The density of planted trees for household

decision maker on tree management and kinship

Photo 2. Household survey in Malawi

Activities Head (%) Spouse (%) Joint (%) N

Crops to plant 50.0 10.4 39.6 134

Sowing 50.4 6.7 43.0 135

Weeding 47.4 7.5 45.1 135

Fertilizer 38.8 14.2 47.0 134

Trees to plant 66.7 7.4 25.9 134

Tree management 62.7 8.2 29.1 133

Animals to rear 51.9 12.6 35.6 135

Selling farm products 40.0 17.0 43.0 135

Credit 45.2 18.5 36.3 135

Participation in meetings 54.1 0.7 45.2 135

Firewood collection 27.4 61.5 11.1 135

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

Head Spouse Joint

Matrilineal

Patrilineal

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

Head Spouse Joint

Matrilineal

Patrilineal

• This study aims to (i) identify which household

members are the decision maker(s) for

various agricultural activities including tree

planting; and (ii) evaluate the outcomes of

household decision making by the head, the

spouse, or joint decision making, in terms of

actual trees planted by farming households in two

rural districts in Malawi.

• Research and extension efforts should not

merely target the household head but should

take into consideration that decision making in

relation to farming and tree planting is

multidimensional and site-specific.

• Assumptions on headship and gender roles

need to be locally checked and validated in

order for agroforestry research, policies and

projects to be relevant and effective.