the robin hood tax: everything you need to know

12
THE ROBIN HOOD TAX: EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW robinhoodtax.org.uk

Upload: others

Post on 25-Oct-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: THE ROBIN HOOD TAX: EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW

THE ROBIN HOOD TAX: EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW

robinhoodtax.org.uk

Page 2: THE ROBIN HOOD TAX: EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW

THE BIG IDEA

The idea behind the Robin Hood Tax is simple:

the financial sector has caused the greatest

recession in a generation, affecting millions of

people here in the UK and around the world. The

financial sector must now pay its fair share of

the cost of sorting out the mess it created. The

Robin Hood Tax campaign is calling on the UK

government to raise an additional £20 billion a

year from the banking industry – much needed

revenue that could fight poverty in the UK and

overseas. It could help tackle climate change.

Help protect schools and hospitals. Help stop

massive cuts across the public sector. Help build

new lives around the world…so what are we

waiting for?

The tax is just. The financial sector can afford it.

And academic heavyweights have shown that

the systems are in place to collect it.

WHAT’S THIS GUIDE FOR?

This handy guide to the Robin Hood Tax is all you

need to make you into a star Merry (Wo)Man.

It will tell you everything you need to know and

answer any tricky questions you have about the

campaign.

CONTENTS

01 What is the Robin Hood Tax?Financial Transaction TaxesWhy does the Robin Hood Tax campaign favour Financial Transaction Taxes?The Bank LevyThe Fat Tax

02 Why do we need the Robin Hood Tax? How would the money be spent? At homeAbroadClimate changeWhy should some of this money be used for fighting poverty and climate change in developing countries?

03 Why should the financial sector be taxed? How did our financial sector come to be so bloated?

04 What has the UK government done so far?

05 Has there been any progress globally?

06 Doesn’t the financial sector make an important contribution to our economy?

07 Can the UK’s banks afford to pay £20 billion extra?

08 What about when people say it needs global agreement to work?

09 Won’t companies just avoid the tax or move their businesses offshore?

10 Won’t banks just pass the costs onto us?

11 Can Financial Transaction Taxes reduce speculation and risky financial activity?

Page 3: THE ROBIN HOOD TAX: EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW

01WHAT IS THE ROBIN HOOD TAX?

�� �Robin�Hood�Taxes�would�be�paid�by�the�financial�sector.�They�target�those�who�can�afford�to�pay�more.�And�the�money�would�be�spent�on�those�who�need�it�most�–�the�poor�at�home�and�abroad.�In�the�UK�additional�taxation�of�the�financial�sector�must�meet�two�essential�criteria�to�be�worthy�of�the�name�Robin�Hood:�

•��Any�Robin�Hood�Tax�should�raise�billions�of�pounds�of�revenue�every�year.�We�call�for�a�further�£20�billion�from�the�financial�sector�in�the�UK.

•��Revenue�generated�by�a�Robin�Hood�Tax�must�be�used�to�tackle�poverty�in�the�UK�and�abroad�and�to�fight�the�worst�effects�of�climate�change.�

� �We�believe�that�a�Financial�Transaction�Tax�offers�the�most�potential�–�a�tiny�tax�of�0.05%�(on�average)�on�transactions�such�as�bonds�and�derivatives�could�raise�globally�as�much�as�£250�billion�a�year.�

FINANCIAL TRANSACTION TAXES

Financial�Transaction�Taxes�(FTTs)�are�levied�on�transactions�of�financial�assets,�including�stocks,�bonds,�foreign�exchange�and�derivatives.�With�an�FTT,�each�time�a�financial�product�is�traded,�a�tiny�percentage�(between�0.5%�and�0.005%)�of�the�value�of�the�trade�is�collected�in�tax.

WHY DOES THE ROBIN HOOD TAX CAMPAIGN FAVOUR FINANCIAL TRANSACTION TAXES?

� �The�Robin�Hood�Tax�campaign�believes�FTTs�are�the�most�appropriate�way�to�tax�the�financial�sector.�Here�are�four�reasons�why:

•��They�have�the�greatest�potential�to�raise�revenue.�Implemented�internationally,�Financial�Transaction�Taxes�could�yield�as�much�as�£250�billion�annually,�while�in�the�UK�we�could�raise�tens�of�billions�of�pounds�a�year.1

•��FTTs�are�commonplace�and�have�been�implemented�either�permanently�or�temporarily�in�at�least�40�countries�over�many�decades.2��In�the�UK,�we�have�an�FTT�on�some�share�transactions�of�0.5%,�which�raises�around�£4�billion�a�year.3 FTTs�on�a�broader�range�of�financial�products�could�raise�significantly�more.

•��They�are�simple�and�inexpensive�to�implement�and�difficult�to�avoid.�As�described�later,�whether�transactions�are�carried�out�on�centralised�exchanges�or�spread�throughout�the�world,�the�vast�majority�of�them�are�settled�through�a�handful�of�electronic�clearinghouses�making�such�a�tax�really�hard�to�avoid.4

•��There�is�a�large�amount�of�political�momentum�around�FTTs,�especially�in�Europe.�France,�Germany,�Spain,�Finland,�Austria�and�Belgium�have�all�come�out�in�support�of�an�FTT.�

� �But�we�are�open�to�a�variety�of�different�proposed�Robin�Hood�Taxes,�and�see�levies�on�profits,�remunerations�and�balance�sheets�as�potentially�complementary�with�each�other�(and�with�improved�regulation).�There�are�two�other�taxes�which�you�might�also�hear�about:

THE BANK LEVY

This�proposal,�commonly�referred�to�as�the�Bank�Levy�is�also�known�as�the�Insurance�Levy,�or�by�the�IMF�as�the�Financial�Stability�Contribution�(FSC).�It�refers�to�a�flat�rate�tax�on�financial�institutions�above�a�certain�size.�The�UK�government�announced�that�it�would�implement�a�Bank�Levy�in�the�Emergency�Budget�in�June�2010,�and�other�countries�have�made�similar�commitments�(including�Austria,�France,�Germany,�Hungary,�Portugal�and�Sweden).�

Unfortunately�these�Bank�Levies�will�raise�only�small�sums�of�money,�and�critically,�none�of�the�money�will�be�earmarked�for�helping�those�most�affected�by�the�crisis.�In�the�UK�it�will�raise�just�£2.5�billion�a�year�from�the�financial�sector.�And�shockingly,�much�of�this�will�be�offset�by�a�reduction�in�Corporation�Tax�from�28%�to�24%.�

These�amounts�are�tiny�in�comparison�to�the�implicit�subsidy�the�banks�receive�from�Government.�By�refusing�to�let�the�big�banks�go�bust,�the�UK�and�other�countries�ensure�that�the�banks�can�borrow�money�on�far�more�generous�terms�than�other�businesses.�In�the�UK,�the�Bank�of�England�have�estimated�that�this�subsidy�is�worth�approximately�£100bn�a�year.5�Even�the�Financial�Times6�is�arguing�for�further�taxes�on�the�banks.

THE FAT TAX

� �The�FAT�tax�(Financial�Activities�Tax)�is�a�charge�on�financial�sector�profits�and�remuneration.�It�was�first�proposed�by�the�IMF�in�its�influential�June�2010�report,�A�Fair�and�Substantial�Contribution�by�the�Financial�Sector.�The�IMF�proposed�such�a�tax�because�it�would�correct�what�it�called�an�“under-taxed�and�hence�perhaps�‘too�big’”�financial�sector.�It�is�also�supported�by�the�European�Commission�and�the�UK�government.

� �According�to�the�IMF,�a�FAT�tax�of�10%�(half�the�rate�of�VAT)�could�raise�about�£9bn�in�the�UK.�

So�what’s�the�rationale�for�an�organisation�like�the�IMF�suggesting�a�new�tax�on�the�banks?�

Somewhat�incredibly,�whilst�VAT�goes�up�for�ordinary people,�the�financial�sector�remains�VAT�exempt.�That�means�every�time�you�buy�a�car,�you�pay�VAT.�Every�time�a�trader�sells�a�derivative�or�bond,�they�pay�nothing.�This�means�a�staggering�loss�in�tax�revenue�that�instead�helps�to�boost�bank�profits�and�pay.

Page 4: THE ROBIN HOOD TAX: EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW

The�financial�crisis�and�recession�have�left�a�massive�hole�in�the�UK’s�public�finances,�hitting�front�line�services�and�jobs.�The�largest�recession�of�a�generation�has�had�a�disastrous�impact�not�just�in�the�UK,�but�on�the�public�finances�of�many�developing�countries�as�well.�Hundreds�of�thousands�of�supporters�of�the�Robin�Hood�Tax�campaign�believe�that�banks,�hedge�funds�and�the�rest�of�the�financial�sector�should�be�asked�to�pay�their�fair�share�to�clear�up�the�mess�they�helped�create.�We�are�calling�on�the�UK�financial�sector�to�pay�an�additional�£20�billion�per�year�in�taxation.�Globally,�we�are�calling�for�Robin�Hood�Taxes�to�raise�as�much�as�£250�billion�per�year.�Our�proposal�is�that�the�money�be�split�as�follows:

•��50%�to�be�used�to�protect�the�poorest�and�most�vulnerable�at�home;

•��25%�to�be�used�to�help�those�in�developing�countries�hit�hardest�by�the�financial�crisis;

•��25%�towards�much�needed�resources�to�fight�climate�change�at�home�and�abroad.�

Here’s�why�we�need�the�Robin�Hood�Tax:

AT HOME

The�banking�crisis�has�hit�people�in�the�UK�hard.�They�are�losing�their�jobs,�crucial�services�and�most�alarmingly�their�homes.�Youth�unemployment�is�sky-rocketing.�According�to�Save�the�Children,�1.7�million�children�in�the�UK�live�in�severe�poverty,�which�means�living�without�basic�necessities�such�as�clothing�and�food.8�This�year,�the�UK�government�has�announced�plans�to�cut�£81�billion�from�the�national�budget�through�to�2015.�These�cuts�will�push�people�further�into�debt�and�deeper�into�poverty.�A�Robin�Hood�Tax�offers�an�alternative�to�the�cuts.

ABROAD

The�consequences�of�the�financial�crisis�have�been�serious�in�the�UK�and�the�developed�world,�but�they�have�been�even�worse�in�more�vulnerable�countries�that�did�nothing�to�cause�it.�As�a�direct�result�of�the�crisis,�developing�and�emerging�country�output,�exports,�migrant�remittances,�capital�inflows,�and�foreign�aid�have�all�been�lower�than�expected�over�the�last�three�years.�On�the�ground,�the�effect�is�devastating.�In�Sub-Saharan�Africa,�

an�estimated�30�to�50�thousand�extra�infants�died�in�2009.9 The World�Bank�estimates�that,�globally,�an�additional�120�million�people�have�been�forced�to�live�on�less�than�US$2�a�day�and�an�additional�89�million�on�less�than�US$1.25�a�day.10

The�Millennium�Development�Goals�are�now�in�jeopardy�as�governments�struggle�to�live�up�to�their�foreign�aid�commitments.�Tony�Dolphin,�senior�economist�at�the�Institute�for�Public�Policy�Research,�explains:�‘Although�the�worst�of�the�crisis�appears�to�be�in�the�past,�its�effect�on�emerging�and�developing�economies�will�continue�well�into�the�future.�Lower�employment�rates�and�a�lack�of�social�safety�nets�mean�that�poverty�is�higher�than�it�would�otherwise�have�been�and�achieving�the�Millennium�Development�Goal�of�halving�poverty�by�2015�will�be�that�much�harder.’11

This�crisis�was�caused�by�the�financial�sector�and�it�needs�to�pay�to�fix�the�problems�it�helped�create.

CLIMATE CHANGE

A�tragic�parallel�between�climate�change�and�the�financial�crisis�is�that�those�least�responsible�suffer�the�most.�While�rich�countries�and�powerful�corporations,�many�with�ties�to�the�financial�sector,�have�produced�most�of�the�greenhouse�gases�that�are�causing�climate�change,�poorer�countries�are�expected�to�bear�75-80%�of�the�costs.12�Disrupted�seasonal�patterns�lead�to�failed�crops,�and�increased�floods,�droughts,�cyclones�and�storms�lead�to�severe�hunger,�poverty,�disease,�and�lost�homes.�According�to�The�Stern�Review�of�the�Economics�of�Climate�Change,�there�could�be�up�to�200�million�environmental�refugees�by�2050.13��Insurance�giant�Munich�Re�estimates�that�losses�from�climate-related�catastrophes�have�increased�10%�since�1980,�and�averaged�$100�billion�per�annum�over�the�last�decade.14��The�costs�fall�disproportionately�on�developing�countries,�which�are�less�equipped�to�deal�with�catastrophes,�and�in�which�agriculture�–�particularly�subsistence�agriculture�–�constitutes�a�significant�proportion�of�GDP.�

A�Robin�Hood�Tax�would�provide�a�new�source�of�finance�to�help�those�experiencing�climate�change�deal�with�its�devastating�effects.

WHY SHOULD SOME OF THIS MONEY BE USED FOR FIGHTING POVERTY AND CLIMATE CHANGE IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES?

Research�for�Oxfam�has�shown�that�the�56�poorest�countries�are�facing�a�$65�billion�dollar�hole�in�their�finances�because�of�the�financial�crisis�caused�by�the�banks.�This�means�cuts�in�education�health�and�support�for�farmers.�In�desperately�poor�countries,�that�means�people�losing�their�lives.�So�a�tax�on�the�banks�should�help�those�hit�by�the�financial�crisis�in�poor�countries�as�well�as�the�UK.�

At�the�same�time�rich�nations,�who�did�the�most�to�cause�climate�change,�have�promised�to�find�$100�billion�dollars�to�help�poor�countries�who�are�hit�hardest�by�its�consequences.�It�makes�sense�for�the�financial�sector�to�contribute�to�the�urgent�financing�required�to�fight�climate�change,�a�point�recognised�by�both�Germany’s�Chancellor�Merkel�and�France’s�President�Sarkozy.�

It�is�for�these�reasons�that�we�think�that�half�the�money�raised�should�be�spent�helping�the�poorest�in�developing�countries�and�fighting�climate�change�at�home�and�abroad,�and�the�other�half�spent in�the�UK.

02WHY DO WE NEED THE

ROBIN HOOD TAX?

HOW WOULD THE MONEY

BE SPENT?

Page 5: THE ROBIN HOOD TAX: EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW

Not�only�is�the�financial�sector�the�most�able�to�pay�(and�currently�under-taxed),�but�it�is�also�the�same�sector�that�got�us�into�trouble�in�the�first�place.�The�financial�sector�precipitated�the�financial�crisis�and�the�largest�recession�since�the�1930s.�Numerous�financial�institutions�exploited�their�too-big-to-fail�status�and�engaged�in�risky�behaviour�that�took�our�economy�to�the�brink.�Through�the�bank�bailout,�UK�taxpayers�effectively�underwrote�the�financial�sector’s�get�out�of�jail�free�card.�The�IMF�has�calculated�that�the�un-recovered�cost�to�the�UK�of�the�bank�bailout�was�₤99�billion1,�the�cost�to�the�UK�economy�as�a�whole�of�the�financial�crisis�in�terms�of�lost�output�will�be�₤497�billion,�and�the�resulting�increase�in�government�debt�over�the�period�of�2008-15�will�be�₤737�billion.15�This�money�is�now�spurring�a�rapid�return�to�record�breaking�profits�and�bonuses�for�the�banks.�According�to�the�Governor�of�the�Bank�of�England,�Mervyn�King,�“never�in�the�field�of�financial�endeavour�has�so�much�money�been�owed�by�so�few�to�so�many”.16

In�the�last�two�decades�the�financial�sector�has�undergone�runaway�expansion�with�its�activities�becoming�steadily�more�divorced�from�the�real�economy�of�goods�and�services.�Much�of�the�excessive�growth�is�from�speculative�“high�frequency�trading”�

03WHY SHOULD THE

FINANCIAL SECTOR BE

TAXED?

or�casino-style�banking,�which�increases�volatility�in�the�financial�markets�(see�below�for�more�on�this).�Globally,�the�volume�of�financial�trade�weighs�in�at�a�colossal�US$3,260�trillion�–�73.5�times�the�size�of�nominal�world�GDP.�This�ratio�is�highest�in�the�UK,�where�in�2007�the�volume�of�financial�transactions�reached�a�staggering�446�times�the�size�of�our�real�economy.17�Our�over-reliance�on�the�City�of�London�is�also�the�reason�why�the�impact�of�the�recession�in�the�UK�was�so�savage.�

HOW DID OUR FINANCIAL SECTOR COME TO BE SO BLOATED?

Part�of�it,�according�to�the�IMF,�is�that�the�financial�sector�is�“under-taxed”18�relative�to�the�rest�of�the�economy.�Unlike�normal�goods�and�services�such�as�a�car,�or�a�plumber,�financial�sector�goods�and�services�are�not�subject�to�VAT.�Because�of�this�exemption,�the�IMF�argues�that�the�financial�industry�has�an�advantage�over�the�rest�of�the�economy�and�that�money�has�been�directed�to�it�and�away�from�other�sectors.�They�conclude�that�“the�financial�sector�may�be…�‘too�big’”.19��Even�Lord�Turner,�Chairman�of�the�Financial�Services�Authority�has�called�the�sector�‘swollen’.�

Yet�the�UK�government�has�not�implemented�the�financial�sector�taxes�recommended�by�the�IMF�and�the�European�Commission.�Instead,�it�announced�swingeing�spending�cuts�and�a�rise�in�VAT�to�20%.�A�hike�in�VAT�hits�the�poor�hardest,�because�with�less�income,�a�higher�proportion�of�their�income�is�spent�on�consumption.20�Furthermore,�a�rise�in�VAT�will�tilt�our�fiscal�imbalance�even�further�in�favour�of�the�financial�sector�at�the�expense�of�the�rest�of�the�economy.

The�Robin�Hood�Tax�campaign�believes�that�rather�than�punishing�ordinary�people�for�the�financial�crisis,�we�should�be�looking�to�the�very�sector�that�got�us�into�this�mess�to�help�get�us�out.�So�far�the�government�has�implemented�a�disappointing�Bank�Levy�that�will�eventually�generate�only�£2.5�billion�a�year�in�the�UK�(and�be�partially�offset�by�the�government’s�decision�to�reduce�corporation�tax�from�28%�to�24%).�The�Robin�Hood�Tax�campaign�is�calling�on�George�Osborne�to�implement�financial�sector�taxes�of�£20�billion�a�year�in�the�UK.�By�comparison,�the�global�profits�and�bonus�pot�for�2010�is�likely�to�have�been�between�$600�billion�and�a�$1,000�billion�(a�trillion)�dollars.21

Page 6: THE ROBIN HOOD TAX: EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW

05HAS THERE BEEN ANY

PROGRESS GLOBALLY?

The�popular�momentum�behind�the�campaign�has�helped�make�financial�sector�taxes�a�mainstream�political�issue�around�the�world.�In�a�report�in�June�2010,�the�IMF�acknowledged�that�the�financial�sector�was�“under-taxed”�and�urged�governments�to�implement�new�financial�sector�taxes.�

In�Europe,�several�countries�have�come�out�in�support�of�a�Financial�Transaction�Tax.�President�Sarkozy�has�outlined�that�financial�sector�taxes�are�at�the�top�of�France’s�agenda�for�its�presidency�of�both�the�G8�and�G20,�and�has�commissioned�Bill�Gates�to�write�a�report�investigating�them�and�other�forms�of�innovative�finance�for�development..�The�German�government�is�already�planning�to�introduce�an�FTT�in�2012�or�2013,�and�countries�including�Spain,�Finland,�Austria�and�Belgium�are�also�in�favour.�The�European�Parliament�has�also�voted�in�favour�of�introducing�a�European-level�FTT�and�there�is�a�real�possibility�that�there�will�be�an�agreement�on�an�FTT�within�Europe�by�the�end�of�the�year.�

A�large�number�of�developing�countries�also�support�an�FTT.�Brazil�and�South�Africa�have�implemented�their�own�Financial�Transaction�Taxes,�while�the�South�African�Finance�Minister�has�said�he�is�in�favour�of�a�European-level�FTT.�At�the�2011�Spring�Meetings�of�the�International�Financial�Institutions,�20�low-income�Francophone�countries�said�they�support�a�broad-based�FTT.�

04WHAT HAS THE UK

GOVERNMENT DONE SO

FAR?

Chancellor�George�Osborne�introduced�a�Bank�Levy�in�January�2011�but�it�misses�the�mark�as�it�will�only�raise�£2.5�billion�annually,�and�doesn’t�ring�fence�any�money�to�help�the�people�hit�hardest�by�the�financial�crisis.�Reductions�in�corporation�tax�mean�the�actual�revenue�collected�is�even�lower.�

This�is�nowhere�near�enough.�So,�based�on�research�as�to�how�much�it�can�afford�to�pay,�we�are�calling�on�the�Chancellor�to�tax�the�UK’s�financial�sector�by�an�extra�£20�billion�a�year.�

One�of�the�reasons�the�government�has�not�done�more�is�the�immense�power�of�the�City�of�London�in�lobbying�and�influencing�politicians.�That�is�why�huge�public�pressure�is�needed�to�convince�the�government�it�is�more�costly�to�ignore�the�people�than�to�ignore�the�banks.�

Page 7: THE ROBIN HOOD TAX: EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW

06DOESN’T THE

FINANCIAL SECTOR

MAKE AN IMPORTANT

CONTRIBUTION TO OUR

ECONOMY?

Absolutely,�it�accounts�for�about�8%�of�UK�GDP.�A�healthy�and�robust�financial�sector�is�essential�to�our�society’s�well-being�as�it�lends�to�businesses�and�individuals�and�provides�high�street�banking�services.�However,�unfettered�by�regulation,�a�distinct�area�of�the�financial�sector�–�namely�casino-style�trading,�the�worst�of�which�is�the�high�frequency�trading�–�has�grown�out�of�control.�Lord�Turner,�Chairman�of�the�Financial�Services�Authority,�has�questioned�this�area’s�contribution,�calling�the�sector�‘swollen’�and�‘socially�useless’.�By�taxing�this�area�of�business�we�can�raise�much�needed�revenue�and�help�to�rebalance�our�economy�away�from�our�over-reliance�on�the�City�of�London.

The Robin�Hood�Tax�campaign�ultimately�wants�to�see�a�Financial�Transaction�Tax�introduced�that�would�raise�money�from�the�financial�world�and�curb�the�worst�aspects�of�its�behaviour.�High�frequency�trading�(HFT)�has�developed�to�such�an�extent�that�dealers�such�as�those�from�Tradebot�in�the�US�hold�a�stock�on�average�for�just�11�seconds.22 These purchases�aren’t�made�like�normal�business�decisions�because�they�take�no�account�of�the�fundamental�determinants�of�a�stock’s�worth,�but�instead�try�to�second-guess�other�market�participants’�actions�and�benefit�from�tiny�movements�in�price.�Computer�programs�trade�and�sell�large�volumes�in�very�short�time�periods,�generally�milliseconds�or�microseconds�(one�millionth�of�a�second).�“Tens�of�thousands�of�trades�are�executed�by�these�trading�machines�in�the�blink�of�an�eye,”�explains�Martin�Wheatly,�CEO�of�the�Securities�and�Future�Commission�in�Hong�Kong�and�former�deputy�chief�executive�of�the�London�Stock�Exchange,�“There�are�some�estimates�that�HFT�now�represents�60-70�per�cent�of�the�trading�volume�in�the�US�market.”23��A�similar�picture�exists�here�in�the�UK.��

Beyond�contributing�little�value�to�the�real�economy,�HFT�also�increases�volatility,�as�traders�make�large�gambles�on�very�small�changes�in�the�market.�This�volatility�is�illustrated�best�by�the�“flash�crash”�of�May�6,�2010�when�a�trader�sold�75�thousand�stocks�worth�USD�4.1�billion�in�20�minutes.�The�sudden�drop�in�value�spurred�high�frequency�traders�to�go�into�a�spiral�of�selling,�causing�US�stock�prices�to�plummet,�some�down�to�a�cent,�and�then�rebound�within�minutes.�

Many�serious�commentators�have�highlighted�the�dangers�of�this�process,�and�have�called�for�an�FTT�to�calm�this�frenzied�whirlpool�of�transactions.�This�includes�Martin�Wheatley,�the�new�head�of�the�Consumer�Protection�and�Markets�Authority�and�Lord�Turner,�head�of�the�Financial�Services�Authority.24

Page 8: THE ROBIN HOOD TAX: EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW

08WOULD THIS ONLY WORK

IF ALL COUNTRIES ACTED

TOGETHER?

International�agreement�would�be�great,�but�we�don’t�have�to�wait.�At�least�40�countries�around�the�globe�have�implemented�Financial�Transaction�Taxes�on�their�own.28 The UK�has�a�long�and�commendable�history�of�spearheading�new�approaches�to�financial�sector�taxation,�including�a�FTT�on�share�transactions,�known�as�the�Stamp�Duty�on�shares.�The�0.5%�Stamp�Duty�yields�£4�billion�a�year�and�hasn’t�stopped�the�London�Stock�Exchange�being�one�of�the�most�profitable�markets�in�the�world.�More�recently�the�UK�government�pressed�ahead�with�France�and�Germany�to�implement�the�£2.5�billion�bank�levy.�Momentum�is�building�behind�an�EU-wide�FTT,�but�it�is�entirely�possible�for�countries�to�lead�with�unilateral�action.�The�IMF�conclude�that�FTT’s�“do�not�automatically�drive�out�financial�activity�to�an�unacceptable�extent”.29

07CAN THE UK’S BANKS

AFFORD TO PAY £20

BILLION EXTRA?

Firstly,�we�are�asking�for�a�fairer�contribution�from�not�just�banks�but�from�the�entire�financial�sector�–�that’s�hedge�funds,�asset�managers�and�the�rest.�Furthermore,�the�Bank�of�England�have�estimated�that�by�underwriting�the�banks,�the�Treasury�provides�them�with�an�implicit�subsidy�worth�approximately�£100bn�a�year.25�It’s�clear�that�the�banks�are�under-taxed�(the�IMF�agrees),�and�as�a�result�there�is�plenty�of�spare�money�sloshing�about�in�the�financial�sector�as�their�latest�round�of�bonuses�shows.�They�can�easily�afford�to�pay�their�way.

The�UK�financial�sector’s�income�chargeable�to�tax�could�reach�£75�billion�in�2011,�25�per�cent�higher�than�in�2007-08.�Bonus�payments�could�be�as�much�as�£7�billion�in�the�same�year,�making�a�total�of�more�than�£80�billion.26�But�the�true�total�is�much,�much�higher�once�you�include,�for�example,�hedge�funds�that�are�registered�in�the�Cayman�Islands�and�trading�in�the�UK.�These�funds�are�notoriously�secretive,�but�in�just�six�months�the�ten�leading�hedge�funds�alone�made�$28bn�for�their�customers�in�the�second�half�of�2010.27��Add�to�this�commonly�used�‘creative’�accounting�techniques,�and�it�is�clear�that�the�financial�sector’s�true�total�profit�is�many�tens�of�billions�higher.�It�can�easily�afford�another�£20�billion.�

When�looking�at�taxes�you�have�to�compare�like�with�like.�Consider�what�taxes�you�have�to�pay.�Income�tax�is�paid�on�everything�you�earn.�The�equivalent�of�income�tax�for�the�financial�sector�is�corporation�tax�(which�will�be�reduced�from�28%�to�24%�as�a�result�of�the�2010�Emergency�Budget).�You�also�pay�VAT�on�most�goods�and�services�that�you�buy (which�was�increased�in�January�2011�to�20%�from�17.5%),�yet�incredibly�the�financial�sector�remains�VAT�exempt.� Each�time�a�financial�good�or�service�is�bought�not�a�penny of�VAT�is�paid.�

Page 9: THE ROBIN HOOD TAX: EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW

09WON’T COMPANIES

JUST AVOID THE TAX OR

MOVE THEIR BUSINESSES

OFFSHORE?

Critics�of�the�FTT�often�say�it�will�lead�to�a�mass�exodus�from�the�City.�This�claim�is�unsubstantiated�and�overblown.�It�is�used�as�a�bargaining�chip�by�the�banks�to�cajole�the�government�into�not�acting.�Before�looking�at�the�details,�to�illustrate�this,�here’s�an�anecdote:�Terry�Smith,�head�of�Tullett�Prebon,�a�City�broker,�famously�said�in�December�2009�that�he�would�allow�any�of�the�company’s�950�London-based�staff�to�move�overseas�before�the�Labour�governments�one-off�50%�supertax�on�bonuses�over�£25�thousand�came�into�force�in�December�2009.�The�Guardian�reported�on�14�April�2010�that�so�far�‘none�…�have�taken�him�up�on�the�offer.’30�Even�the�Financial�Times�has�argued�that�banks�threats�to�leave�“should�be�faced�down,�not�just�because�they�are�unreasonable�but�because�they�are�of�questionable�credibility”.31

FTTs�are�commonplace�and�have�raised�billions�of�dollars�of�predictable�revenue�without�serious�avoidance.�As�stated�by�the�IMF,�FTTs�(which�it�calls�STTs)�“are�certainly�feasible�as�witnessed�by�their�use�in�numerous�developed�countries.�The�fact�that�major�financial�centers�such�as�the�UK,�Switzerland,�Hong�Kong,�Singapore,�and�South�Africa�levy�forms�of�STTs�indicates�that�such�taxes�do�not�automatically�drive�out�financial�activity�to�an�unacceptable�extent.”32

The�lack�of�avoidance�stems�from�the�multiplicity�of�reasons�for�which�investors�trade�in�a�particular�location�–�reasons�that�hold�more�significance�than�the�domestic�tax�regime.�Consider�the�advantages�gained�by�investors�from�being�concentrated�in�one�marketplace�with�immediate�access�to�information,�support�services,�and�trading�partners.�The�gains�from�these�so-called�network�externalities�greatly�outweigh�the�potential�burden�from�Robin�Hood�Taxes,�and�would�mitigate�any�incentive�for�firms�to�move�to�an�untaxed�location�in�the�case�of�unilateral�implementation.�And�of�course,�banks�need�to�locate�in�a�country�with�a�big�enough�budget�to�bail�them�out�if�things�go�wrong.�There�are�not�many�governments�with�the�ability�or�willingness�to�provide�this�implicit�guarantee,�certainly�not�the�Cayman�Islands�or�even�Switzerland.

Furthermore,�time�zones�are�critical�for�financial�transactions,�with�London�being�ideally�situated�between�the�Asian�and�US�markets.�This�means�that�banks�and�other�financial�institutions�cannot�all�move�to�New�York�as�a�major�financial�

centre�will�still�be�needed�in�Europe.�Germany,�the�main�competitor�in�the�European�time�zone�is�already�committed�to�implementing�an�FTT.

Ideally�Robin�Hood�Taxes�would�be�implemented�internationally.�However,�in�working�towards�an�international�consensus,�individual�countries,�or�regions�like�the�EU,�can�and�should�take�the�lead�by�unilaterally�implementing�Robin�Hood�Taxes�within�their�own�market,�especially�as�the�evidence�so�far�shows�that�this�will�not�result�in�a�mad�dash�of�capital�out�of�the�countries�that�are�implementing�a�tax�on�their�financial�sectors.�

Global�currency�markets,�the�largest�financial�market�in�the�world�at�$4�billion�per�day,�in�which�speculators�have�been�free�to�reap�huge�profits�at�the�expense�of�wider�society,�offer�a�clear�first�step�for�FTT�implementation.�Every�high�value�Sterling�transaction,�no�matter�where�in�the�world�it�takes�place�–�New�York,�Johannesburg,�or�Timbuktu�–�is�settled�via�the�Continuous�Linked�Settlement�(CLS)�Bank,�making�a�FTT�on�currency�transactions�impossible�to�avoid.�But�even�with�other�Robin�Hood�Taxes,�the�assertion�that�they�will�lead�to�a�mass�exodus�is�unfounded.

For�example,�the�UK’s�existing�stamp�duty�on�share�purchases�applies�to�all�trading�in�shares�listed�in�the�UK,�no�matter�where�the�trade�takes�place.�If�a�share�of�a�company�listed�in�London�changes�hands�anywhere�in�the�world,�then�UK�stamp�duty�is�payable.�Moving�your�trading�business�out�of�the�UK�doesn’t�help�you�avoid�the�tax.

Page 10: THE ROBIN HOOD TAX: EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW

11CAN FINANCIAL

TRANSACTION TAXES

REDUCE SPECULATION

AND RISKY FINANCIAL

ACTIVITY?

10WON’T BANKS JUST PASS

THE COSTS ON TO US?

Robin�Hood�Taxes�are�designed�to�specifically�target�the�excessive�profits,�bonuses,�and�risky�behaviour�in�the�financial�sector,�whilst�protecting�the�investments�of�ordinary�people�and�businesses.�The�IMF�have�suggested�a�Financial�Transaction�Tax�would�be�highly�progressive.33

The�Robin�Hood�Tax�campaign�calls�first�and�foremost�for�a�Financial�Transaction�Tax,�because�the�burden�would�fall�on�a�distinct�area�of�financial�sector�operations�that�is�far�removed�from�the�average�consumer:�casino-style�trading.�

Hedge�funds,�investment�banking�divisions�of�large�banks�and�dedicated�investment�banks�dominate�this�market�and�so�incidence�of�an�FTT�would�fall�primarily�on�these�companies�and�corporations.�Even�if�these�institutions�did�manage�to�pass�the�costs�onto�their�customers,�the�customer-base�of�hedge�funds�and�investment�banks�is�comprised�primarily�of�high�net�worth�individuals,�and�not�ordinary�people�like�you�and�me.

Financial�services�commonly�used�by�businesses�and�ordinary�people,�such�as�retail�banking�services,�pension�funds,�and�insurance�are�a�completely�distinct�area�of�business�and�would�be�relatively�unaffected�by�an�FTT�implemented�at�a�very�low�rate�(0.005-0.5%)�because�these�types�of�transactions�are�much�less�frequent.�Institutional�investors,�including�pension�and�insurance�funds,�tend�to�turn�over�their�portfolios�only�once�a�year.34

Compared�to�other�potential�tax�increases,�Robin�Hood�Taxes�would�impact�much�less�on�the�ordinary�person.�Unlike�VAT,�which�is�regressive�because�the�poor�spend�a�greater�proportion�of�their�income�on�consumption�than�the�rich,�Robin�Hood�Taxes�are�progressive.�Even�if�the�banks�attempt�to�pass�the�tax�on,�the�rich�allocate�much�more�of�their�income�to�financial�services.�It�is�thus�imperative�that�the�UK�government�refrain�from�cutting�essential�social�services�and�taxing�the�poor,�and�instead�implement�these�much�fairer�methods�of�taxation�to�fill�the�hole�in�public�finances.

In�recent�years�there�has�been�an�explosion�in�high�frequency�trading�-�transactions�that�happen�every�few�seconds.�There�has�also�been�a�huge�increase�in�the�trading�of�derivatives,�making�the�volume�of�financial�transactions�increase�to�more�than�70�times�the�size�of�the�world�economy.�Many�serious�commentators�believe�this�volume�is�dangerously�large�and�de-stabilising,�and�that�many�of�these�transactions�are,�in�the�words�of�Lord�Turner,�chair�of�the�Financial�Services�Authority,�‘socially�useless’.�

Many�of�the�most�speculative,�risky�and�socially�useless�transactions�are�based�on�very�small�profit�margins,�meaning�that�even�at�a�very�low�rate�such�as�0.05%,�an�FTT�would�shrink�the�size�of�the�market�by�removing�the�incentive�to�trade.�Many�economists�support�the�FTT�for�this�reason.�

The�Robin�Hood�Tax�campaign�principally�supports�an�FTT�because�of�the�money�it�will�raise�to�help�the�poor.�However,�if�it�also�acts�to�reduce�risky�gambling�and�make�the�world�economy�safer�that�can�only�be�a�good�thing.�

Page 11: THE ROBIN HOOD TAX: EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW

1.�McCulloch,�N.,�and�Pacillo,�G.,�2010.�The�Tobin�Tax�–�A�Review�of�the�Evidence.�Institute�of�Development�Studies.�University�of�Sussex,�UK

2.�Financial�Transaction�Taxes�have�been�implemented�in�Argentina,�Australia,�Austria,�Belgium,�Brazil,�Chile,�China,�Colombia,�Denmark,�Ecuador,�Finland,�France,�Germany,�Greece,�Guatemala,�Hong�Kong,�India,�Indonesia,�Ireland,�Italy,�Japan,�Malaysia,�Morocco,�Netherlands,�New�Zealand,�Pakistan,�Panama,�Peru,�Philippines,�Portugal,�Russia,�Singapore,�South�Africa,�South�Korea,�Sweden,�Switzerland,�Taiwan,�UK,�US,�Venezuela�and�Zimbabwe.�See�Pollin,�R.�2005.�‘Applying�a�Securities�Transaction�Tax�to�the�US.�Design�Issues,�Market�Impact,�and�Revenue�Estimates,’�in�Epstein�G�(ed)�Financialization�and�the�World�Economy.�Edward�Elgar�

3.�European�Commission.�2010.�Financial�Sector�Taxation.�Commission�Staff�Working�Document.�Brussels,�Belgium.�

4.�Leading�Group�on�Innovative�Financing�for�Development,�2010.�Globalizing�Solidarity:�The�Case�for�Financial�Levies.�Also�Schmidt,�R.�2010.�The�Financial�Transaction�Tax:�Feasibility�of�taxing�OTC�derivatives�transactions.�The�North-South�Institute.�Forthcoming.

5.�Bank�of�England,�June�2010.�Financial�Stability�Report.�

6.�http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/72402fea-2d6f-11e0-8f53-00144feab49a.html#axzz1GwrPQXT0,�accessed�on�18th�March�2011

7.�Save�the�Children,�February�2011,�Severe�Child�Poverty:�Nationally�and�Locally

8.�Dolphin,�T.,�and�Chappal,�L.�2010.�The�Effect�of�the�Global�Financial�Crisis�on�Emerging�and�Developing�Economies.�Institute�for�Public�Policy�Research.�London,�UK

9.�Friedman,�J.,�and�Schady,�N.�(2009)�How�Many�More�Infants�Are�Likely�to�Die�in�Africa�as�a�Result�of�the�Global�Financial�Crisis?�Policy�Research�Working�Paper�5023.�World�Bank.�Washington�DC,�USA

10.�Ravallion,�M.�2009.�The�Crisis�and�the�World’s�Poorest,�Development�Outreach.�World�Bank�Institute.�Washington�DC,�USA

11.�Dolphin,�T.,�and�Chappal,�L.�2010.�The�Effect�of�the�Global�Financial�Crisis�on�Emerging�and�Developing�Economies.�Institute�for�Public�Policy�Research.�London,�UK

12.�The�World�Bank�Group,�World�Development�Report�2010

13.�Stern,�N.�2006.�The�Stern�Review�on�the�Economics�of�Climate�Change.�HM�Treasury.�London,�UK

14.�Munich�Climate�Insurance�Initiative.�2009.�Climate�Risk�Management�Mechanisms�including�Insurance,�in�the�context�of�Adaptation�to�Climate�Change.�Submitted�to�the�on�UNFCCC�24�April�2009�

15.�The�IMF�says�the�cost�of�the�bailout�to�the�UK�was�5.4%,�that�the�advanced�G20�economies�will�see�an�increase�in�debt�of�40%,�and�that�the�countries�‘that�experienced�a�systemic�crisis’�[confirmed�by�the�IMF�as�the�UK,�US�and�Germany]�will�experience�an�eventual�overall�loss�of�output�equivalent�to�27%�of�GDP.�UK�GDP�in�2008�was�2,�674�billion�dollars.�

16.�http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/mervyn-king-never-has-so-much-money-been-owed-by-so-few-to-so-many-1806247.html;�accessed�on�21/3/11.

17.�Schulmeister,�S.�2009.�A�General�Financial�Transaction�Tax:�A�Short�Cut�of�the�Pros,�the�Cons,�and�a�Proposal.�Working�Paper�No.�344.�Östreichisches�Institut�Für�Wirtschaftsforschung.

18.�Claessens,�S.,�Keen,�M.,�Pazarbasioglu,�C.�2010.�Financial�Sector�Taxation.� The�IMF’s�Report�to�the�G-20�and�Background�Material.�International�Monetary�Fund.�Washington�DC,�USA

19.�Claessens,�S.,�Keen,�M.,�Pazarbasioglu,�C.�2010.�Financial�Sector�Taxation.� The�IMF’s�Report�to�the�G-20�and�Background�Material.�International�Monetary�Fund.�Washington�DC,�USA

20.�VAT�takes�up�12.1%�of�the�income�of�the�poorest�20%,�compared�to�5.9%�of�the�richest�20%.�Barnard,�A.�(2009)�The�effects�of�taxes�and�benefits�on�household�income,�2007/08,�Economic�&�Labour�Market�Review,�Vol.�3,�No�8,�August�2009,

21.�Estimates�from�Murphy,�R,�Taxing�Banks,�http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Documents/IMFTaxingBanks.pdf�and�Kapoor,�S.�(2010)�Financial�Transaction�Taxes:�Tools�for�Progressive�Taxation�and�Improving�Market�Behaviour,�http://robinhoodtax.org.uk/files/ReDefine-FTTs-as-tools-for-progressive-taxation-and-improving-market-behaviour.pdf�

12ENDNOTES

22.�http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2010/05/17/speedy-new-traders-make-waves-far-from-wall-st/

23.�Wheatley,�M.�2010.�‘We�need�rules�to�limit�the�risks�of�superfast�trades.’�Financial�Times.�Published�20�September�2010�on�FT.com�

24.�http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/ad7f31f6-c4cd-11df-9134-00144feab49a.html#axzz1H9xo7RF3,�and�http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Library/Communication/Speeches/2011/0218_at.shtml�

25.�Bank�of�England,�June�2010.�Financial�Stability�Report.�

26.�Source:�http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2011/jan/10/banks-unlimited-bonuses-ministers.�Accessed�on�7/4/11

27.�Source:�http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2011/mar/02/hedge-funds-bounce-back-79bn-pounds-profit.�Accessed�on�7/4/11

28.�Financial�transaction�taxes�have�been�implemented�in�Argentina,�Australia,�Austria,�Belgium,�Brazil,�Chile,�China,�Colombia,�Denmark,�Ecuador,�Finland,�France,�Germany,�Greece,�Guatemala,�Hong�Kong,�India,�Indonesia,�Ireland,�Italy,�Japan,�Malaysia,�Morocco,�Netherlands,�New�Zealand,�Pakistan,�Panama,�Peru,�Philippines,�Portugal,�Russia,�Singapore,�South�Africa,�South�Korea,�Sweden,�Switzerland,�Taiwan,�UK,�US,�Venezuela�and�Zimbabwe.�See�Pollin,�R.�2005.�‘Applying�a�Securities�Transaction�Tax�to�the�US.�Design�Issues,�Market�Impact,�and�Revenue�Estimates,’�in�Epstein�G�(ed)�Financialization�and�the�World�Economy.�Edward�Elgar

29.�Claessens,�S.,�Keen,�M.,�Pazarbasioglu,�C.�2010.�Financial�Sector�Taxation.�The�IMF’s�Report�to�the�G-20�and�Background�Material.�International�Monetary�Fund.�Washington�DC,�USA

30.�Teather,�D.�2010.�‘City�veteran�Terry�Smith�pockets�£4m�bonus.’�Guardian.�Published�14�April�2010�on�guardian.co.uk�

31.�http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/2e6ba9a6-49bd-11e0-acf0-00144feab49a.html#axzz1G7ES1kdG,�accessed�on�9/3/11.

32.�Claessens,�S.,�Keen,�M.,�Pazarbasioglu,�C.�2010.�Financial�Sector�Taxation.�The�IMF’s�Report�to�the�G-20�and�Background�Material.�International�Monetary�Fund.�Washington�DC,�USA

33.�Claessens,�S.,�Keen,�M.,�Pazarbasioglu,�C.�2010.�Financial�Sector�Taxation.�The�IMF’s�Report�to�the�G-20�and�Background�Material.�International�Monetary�Fund.�Washington�DC,�USA

43.�Kapoor,�S.�2010.�Financial�Transaction�Taxes:�Tools�for�Progressive�Taxation�and�Improving�Market�Behaviour.�Re-Define.

Page 12: THE ROBIN HOOD TAX: EVERYTHING YOU NEED TO KNOW