the risk of assuming foreign cost-effectiveness ratios the case of palivizumab in colombia and...

11
1/10 diego.rosselli@gmail. THE RISK OF ASSUMING FOREIGN COST-EFFECTIVENESS RATIOS THE CASE OF PALIVIZUMAB IN COLOMBIA AND NORTHERN CANADA Anna Banerji 1 , Diego Rosselli 2 , Juan David Rueda 2, 3 1 University of Toronto, 2 Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, 3 Cochrane Collaboration Toronto - Bogota

Upload: htai-bilbao-2012

Post on 21-Mar-2017

242 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

1/10

[email protected]

THE RISK OF ASSUMING FOREIGN COST-EFFECTIVENESS RATIOSTHE CASE OF PALIVIZUMAB IN COLOMBIA AND NORTHERN CANADA

Anna Banerji 1, Diego Rosselli 2, Juan David Rueda 2, 31 University of Toronto, 2 Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, 3 Cochrane Collaboration

Toronto - Bogota

2/10

[email protected]

Sincitial Respiratory Virus (SRV)

The problem

Important cause of respiratory disease in childrenLife threatening in pre-term babies

Predisposes to asthmaIncidence varies with seasons and genetic factors

From 2-4% in tropical countriesto 17-52% in the Arctic winter

3/10

[email protected]

Palivizumab (Synagis ®)

The intervention

Monoclonal antibody against fusion protein of RSV

Licensed in 1998

One clinical trial (IMpact Study, Pediatrics 1998)

55% reduction in hospitalization rates

Non-significant reduction in mortality

The context

Inuit territory

The context

6/10

[email protected]

InuitColombia

The context

Population 100,000 46 million

Newborns per year 2,000 900,000

Pre-term (<35 weeks) 180 80,000

Urban (cities > 100 k) 0% 75%

7/10

[email protected]

CanadaColombia

The costs

Palivizumab (per mg) € 11.48 € 10.97

per 50 mg vial € 574 € 549

per child € 2,755 € 2,635

RSV infection € 21,575 € 777

8/10

[email protected]

The analysis

9/10

[email protected]

The results

In Northern Canada Palivizumab is cost-saving.

Even in the best-case scenario, palivizumab in Colombia is

NOT cost-effective.

Cost per QALY almost 5 times per capita GDP

€ 275,000 per asthma case averted

€ 850,000 per death averted

10/10

[email protected]

Conclusions

Cost-effectiveness “does not travel”

Despite similar basic assumptions and similar price

Great variations due to local epidemiology of disease

and cost of complications

Budget impact would also support different decisions

11/10

[email protected]

Conclusions

¡Gracias!