the rise and fall of ken wilber

8/16/2019 The Rise and Fall of Ken Wilber

1/16

6/3/2016 The Rise And Fall of Ken Wilber

http://markmanson.net/ken-wilber 1

MENU

Articles

About

Best Articles

Complete Archive

Downloads

Books

Audio

Video

Courses

Conversations & Connection

Overcome Anxiety

Dating & Relationships

Courses Log In

Subscription

Subscribe

Log In

THE RISE AND

FALL OF KEN

MARK MANSONPersonal Development That Doesn't Suck

MM.NET

Now reading:The Rise And Fall of Ken Wilber

Audio Version

Mark's Commentary

Print PDF

http://markmanson.net/http://markmanson.net/http://markmanson.net/http://markmanson.net/subscribehttp://premium.markmanson.net/http://markmanson.net/courseshttp://markmanson.net/videoshttp://markmanson.net/audiohttp://markmanson.net/http://markmanson.net/abouthttp://markmanson.net/http://markmanson.net/https://twitter.com/share?original_referer=http%3A%2F%2Fmarkmanson.net%2Fken-wilber&text=The%20Rise%20And%20Fall%20of%20Ken%20Wilber&url=http%3A%2F%2Fmarkmanson.net%2Fken-wilber&via=IAmMarkMansonhttp://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fmarkmanson.net%2Fken-wilberhttp://markmanson.net/archivehttp://markmanson.net/http://markmanson.net/http://markmanson.net/log-inhttp://markmanson.net/subscribehttp://markmanson.net/subscribehttp://premium.markmanson.net/http://markmanson.net/dating-relationships-coursehttp://markmanson.net/overcome-anxiety-coursehttp://markmanson.net/connection-coursehttp://markmanson.net/courseshttp://markmanson.net/videoshttp://markmanson.net/audiohttp://markmanson.net/bookshttp://markmanson.net/downloadshttp://markmanson.net/archivehttp://markmanson.net/best-articles/http://markmanson.net/abouthttp://markmanson.net/archive


2/16



Ken Wilber is the smartest man you’ve never heard

of. He’s a philosopher and mystic whose workattempts to integrate all fields of study into one

single model or framework of understanding.

When I say, “all fields of study,” I mean that literally. Wilber believes that

every field of knowledge contains at least one aspect of truth, no matter howsmall, and that reconciling disparate disciplines is a matter of integrating

what’s right about them rather than discounting them for being partially

wrong. As Wilber often puts it: “No one is smart enough to be wrong 100% of

the time,” and therefore we should focus on what’s right and leave out the res

Neurobiology, Jungian archetypes, horticultural societies, hermeneutics,

Hegelian dialectics, systems theory, Zen koans, post-structuralism, VedantanHinduism, capitalist economic systems, transpersonal states of consciousness

neo-Platonic forms — the list goes on and on — all explained and fit together

neatly in one map of reality, what he semi-ironically calls, “A Theory of

Everything.” Above all, he manages to explain it all in lucid and brilliant prose

You literally feel yourself getting smarter as you read him.

WILBERJune 4, 2012 14 minute read by Mark Manson• •

http://markmanson.net/author/mark-mansonhttp://markmanson.net/ken-wilber


3/16



An intellectual prodigy as a child, Wilber was a Doctoral student at Duke

University in biology when he quit his program in order to, as he put it, “sit in

a room by myself and stare at a wall for five years.” He then went on a binge of

studying eastern spirituality, religion, and psychology.

Here’s a video of him stopping and starting his brain waves using differentforms of meditation:

I discovered Wilber when I was 19. That same year I read his books, all 15 of

them. They were dense, but it was a watershed moment in my intellectual and

personal growth. Discovering him was truly conscious-expanding. After

understanding his model, the rest of the world felt simpler. Also, I had a very

Ken Wilber Stops His Brain Waves

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LFFMtq5g8N4


4/16



powerful spiritual experience when I was a teenager, but could never reconcile

any sort of spiritual practice or belief with scientific knowledge and rigor.

Wilber did that for me. He’s been one of the most influential thinkers, if not

the most influential thinker in my life.

There’s not nearly enough room on this blog to do Wilber’s theory justice. Buif you’ve got time and are up for an intellectual exercise, you can find a

summary of his integrated psychological model here, a brief overview of his

AQAL model here, and a long-form critique of his work here.

Of course, the best way to learn about his material is to go to the man himself.

recommend everyone begin with A Brief History of Everything followed byntegral Psychology and his masterpiece, Sex, Ecology, Spirituality .

Instead of attempting to explain his work, I’ll instead outline a few of the most

important ways that he’s influenced my own thinking:

1. Nothing is 100% right or wrong, they merely vary in their degree of

incompleteness and dysfunction. No one or nothing is 100% good or evil,they just vary in their degree of ignorance and disconnection. All

knowledge is a work in progress.

2. Leaps in evolution usually occur in a manner of “transcending and

including,” not by wiping out what came before. For instance, the

evolution to the developmental level of a single-cell organism did not wipout molecules, but included them into a greater order of complexity.

Wilber asserts that this pattern of evolution occurs with all phenomena.

Rational thought did not eliminate emotion, but included it into a greater

developmental level of consciousness. Industrial societies did not wipe ou

agriculture, but transcended agriculture into greater levels of efficiency

and prosperity. If we’re going to truly evolve, we do so by including and

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1570627444/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=entsblo-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=1570627444http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1570625549/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=entsblo-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=1570625549http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1570627401/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=entsblo-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=1570627401http://www.integralworld.net/meyerhoff-ba-toc.htmlhttp://www.kheper.net/topics/Wilber/Wilber_IV.htmlhttp://www.kenwilber.com/Writings/PDF/SummaryofMyPsychologicalModel_GENERAL_2000_NN.pdf


5/16



integrating what came before into something greater, not by wiping it out.

3. Related to Point #2: the goal of spirituality is to transcend the ego, not to

demolish it or repress it. Many spiritual leaders who claimed to have rid

themselves of ego, it turns out, merely repress it. The results are horrible

and sometimes tragic.

4. Wilber has a concept called the “Pre/Trans Fallacy” which states that

people often mistake what’s pre-conventional (earlier phase of

development) for being post-conventional (later stage of development)

because neither is conventional. One example he uses is the New Age

spiritual movements which glorify a return to an infantile state of acting

purely on emotion and desire. They mistake these earlier, narcissistic

emotional whims for spiritual experiences, since both emotional revelry

and spiritual experiences are non-rational experiences. Since their

emotional revelry is non-rational, and spiritual experiences are non-

rational, they confuse the two. This concept can be applied in many areas

of personal and social development.

5. Perception contains interior and exterior modalities, or Wilber’s solution

to the Mind-Body Problem in philosophy. You can cut open someone’s

brain, track the neurons firing when they think about a cat, but which is

real, the neurons firing or the thought about the cat? It depends who you

ask. The problem arises when one assumes that our thoughts and behavio

are controlled by the physical assortment of neurons firing. It implies that

our minds are not autonomous and that we lack free will. Wilber states

that both the interior and exterior modes of consciousness are not only

equally real, but reflections of one another. Indeed, research into neuro-

plasticity (the ability to change the physical configuration of your brain

through changing thought patterns and behavior) is beginning to back up

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mind%E2%80%93body_problem


6/16



this conclusion.

6. Hierarchies exist, but they don’t necessarily equal moral superiority.

There are higher levels of development and complexity, people of greater

skills and talents, but that does not mean they are morally superior or

more complete expressions of reality or that lower levels on the hierarchy

should not be honored. For instance, nuclear science is a higher form of

human understanding than voodoo magic or religious dogma, but Wilber

argues that this does not mean one should be imposed onto the other.

Each has its uses depending on where a person’s level of consciousness is

The beauty of integrating ALL fields of knowledge into a single model is that

the model has wide implications on EVERY field of study. Once you

understand Wilber’s conclusions, it becomes apparent how his model and

ideas could benefit everything from politics to science to psychology to

spirituality.

A MOVEMENT IS BORN

In 1999, coming off the success of his monster 1,000-page magnum opus, Sex,

Ecology, Spirituality, and the model of consciousness and development it

presented, Wilber started Integral Institute, a think-tank and academic

institution to set the foundation to disseminate Wilber’s ideas to the world.

World-famous leaders and thinkers such as Al Gore, Tony Robbins , Nathanie

Branden, Alex Grey, David Deida and Tony Schwartz gave ringing

endorsements. Seminars and websites were created, conferences convened. It

seemed a legitimate spiritually-infused intellectual movement was taking form

and was soon to uproot conventional “non-integral” forms of thinking in

http://markmanson.net/diversify-your-identityhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integral_Institutehttp://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1570627444/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&tag=entsblo-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=1570627444


7/16



science, academia, politics,

and society in general.

Among Wilberites, there

was a bursting enthusiasm.

For his entire career, Wilberhad been an intellectual

recluse, turning down every

interview and refusing to

prescribe any sort of action

or application of his model

to the world around him. Hespent more than 20 years in

radio silence. But that was

about to change. At the time,

Wilber talked about the birth of a new integral zeitgeist which he believed

would sweep through conventional thought and change how the world

perceived itself. And we believed him. Wilber’s work had changed our lives, so

naturally we couldn’t wait to see what the actual application of his model coulddo for society at large.

In early 2005, I excitedly attended an Integral Intensive weekend in Boston.

Not only did I want to engage with other “second-tier” thinkers, but I wanted

to somehow get involved and help promote Wilber’s ideas. As a lowly

university student, I scrounged up almost of all of the money I had in order to

go (to this day, it is the only self-help seminar I’ve ever attended).

But upon arrival, my idealism took a punch in the gut. And although the

weekend was an enjoyable experience and in some ways powerful, by the time

left, something didn’t sit right.


8/16



GREAT LIGHT CASTS A GREAT

SHADOW

At the weekend seminar, I couldn’t shake the feeling that what we wereparticipating in was thinly-veiled self-indulgence and little more. In hindsight,

I think this was as much a branding problem (from a business perspective) as

an organizational problem (social perspective). Integral Institute built their

movement in order to influence academia, governmental policy, to get books

and journals published, and to infuse these ideas into the world at large. Yet,

here we were, spending money to sit in a room performing various forms of

meditation and yoga, having group therapy sessions, art performances, andgenerally going on and on about how “integral” we were and how important

we were to the world without seemingly doing anything on a larger scale about

it.

If you want to be a self-development seminar and motivate people, then be a

self-development seminar and motivate people. If you want to be a formalinstitute and have serious effects on policy and academia, then do that. Don’t

half-ass both and muddy them with gratuitous talks and performances. The

irony in all of this was that Wilber’s integral framework applied to

organizations and business and should have accounted for these branding issues ,

but didn’t. The ironies would soon continue to mount.

Following Wilber online, the conversation seemed to only become more andmore insular. With an onslaught of problems in the world crying out for an

integral perspective and solution — terrorism, the Iraq War, climate change,

world hunger, financial crises. The silence coming from the Integral crowd wa

deafening. Major global and social issues were often only referred to in passing

as descriptors for a certain level of consciousness development with the

overarching implication being that “they” are not as highly developed as “we”


9/16



are.

We’re “second-tier” thinkers. We’re going to change the world… as soon as

we’re done talking about how awesome and “second-tier” we are.

Instead, most conversations involved esoteric spiritual topics, impulsive self-expressionism, and re-explaining the integral model in 4,102 different ways.

For a philosophy based on including and integrating as much as possible, its

followers sure expressed it by forming a nicely-sealed bubble around

themselves.

Evidence of this came when Wilber’s critics popped up. Experts in many of the fields Wilber claimed to have “integrated” questioned or picked apart

some of his assumptions. In Wilber’s model, he uses what he refers to as

“orienting generalizations,” ways of summarizing entire fields of study in

order to fit them together with other forms of knowledge. Wilber admits in his

work that he’s generalizing large topics and that there is not consensus in man

fields, but that he’s constructed these generalizations to reflect the basic and

agreed-upon principles of each field of study.

Well, a number of experts began questioning Wilber’s choice of sources. And

as for the claims that what he portrayed as consensus in some fields such as

developmental psychology or sociology, it turned out there was still quite a bit

of debate and uncertainty around some of Wilber’s “basic” conclusions.

Often, what Wilber portrayed as the “consensus” of a certain field actuallyamounted to an obscure or minority position.


10/16



Critics also picked apart Wilber’s model itself, showing minor contradictions

in it. And a number of people caught on to his shockingly meek understanding

of evolutionary biology and his puzzling insinuations of intelligent design.

Wilber’s eventual response to many of these critics was nothing short of

childish — a dozen-or-so page (albeit extremely well-written) verbal shit storm

that clarified nothing, justified nothing, personally attacked everyone, and

straw-manned the shit out of his critics’ claims.

For many, that was the day the intellectual giant fell, the evolution stopped, th

so-called “Einstein of consciousness” took his ball and went home.

From there, the integral movement began to sputter. Rabbi Marc Gafni, a

spiritual leader with whom Wilber aligned himself and even co-sponsored

seminars, was later indicted in Israel for child molestation. Despite this, Wilbe

http://www.kenwilber.com/blog/show/46


11/16



and his movement refused to distance themselves or repudiate him. In fact, th

whole integral scene doubled down, claiming that its critics were “first-tier

thinkers,” and were coming up with lies in order to attack a greater, higher

level of consciousness that it didn’t understand.

The seminars slowed to a crawl. Wilber’s health deteriorated greatly (he wasdiagnosed with a rare disease that keeps him bed-ridden). He stopped writing.

Ten years on, despite developing some fans in academia (some in high places),

Wilber’s work had yet to be tested or peer-reviewed in a serious journal. Much

of his posting online devolved into bizarre spiritual claims (such as this one

about an “enlightened teacher” who can make crops grow twice as fast by

“blessing them”).

The brilliant scientist-turned-monk-turned-recluse-turned-New-Age-celebrity

whose ideas changed everything for so many people (myself included),

devolved into the butt of another New Age joke. How the mighty have fallen.

A CAUTIONARY TALE

Although flawed, Wilber’s integral perspective continues to be an inspiration

in my life. I do believe he will be written about decades or centuries from now,

and will be seen as one of the most brilliant minds of our generation. But as

with most brilliant thinkers, his influence and ideas will be carried on by other

in ways which he did not anticipate or intend.

Wilber’s story is a cautionary tale. His intellectual understanding was

immense, as much as I’ve ever come across in a single person. He also tapped

into some of the farthest reaches of consciousness, spiritual or not, that

humans have self-reported. I do believe that. But ultimately, he was done in by

http://headthegong.com/blog/has-ken-wilber-jumped-the-shark/http://www.integralworld.net/redd.html


12/16



his pride, his need for control and, well, ironically his ego.

The point is, if Wilber can succumb to it, any of us can. No one is immune. N

matter how brilliant and how “enlightened” we are, we’re all animals.

Wilber was a baby boomer in the US through the 60’s and 70’s. He came upthrough many of that generation’s eastern spiritual movements. These

movements were started by eastern teachers and subscribed to a dogma that an

enlightened awareness could develop someone into a flawless individual, an

immutable authority. Despite Wilber’s massive understanding of human

psychology and consciousness, he never seemed to shake this dogma. It

followed Wilber through his career and eventually manifested in himself.When he was younger, he notoriously followed Adi Da, a spiritual leader who

was later found to be sexually abusing female followers. Yet he stood by him.

Later in his career, he also aligned with Andrew Cohen, a spiritual leader who

was found to be physically and emotionally abusing his followers. And again,

he stood by him. Why? Because Wilber maintained they had genuinely reache

the farthest limits of human awareness and understanding.

What Wilber taught me is that no depth of spiritual experience can negate our

physical and primal drives for power, lust and validation. As primates, we’re

wired to seek someone to look up to as well as to be looked up to by others.

And that’s true whether we’re experiencing Godhead or bodhisattva or not.

It’s inescapable.

Wilber also showed me that a brilliant mind does not necessarily make a

brilliant leader. Wilber bragged in an interview that he never planned anything

at Integral Institute, because planning would not represent a “second-tier”

leadership. Despite massive funding, enthusiasm, brain power and demand,

Integral Institute found a way to fail.


13/16



The grand irony here is that Wilber’s model itself, the Integral framework,

accounts for and describes everything I said in the paragraphs above . Wilber failed

in the exact ways his own model predicted. His model champions the idea of

transcending the ego, not negating it. It calls for crowdsourced intellectual

rigor and peer review. It goes on, at length, about the shadow self and how our

unconscious desires sabotage our greater goals. It covers our primal andbiological nature and how our lower impulses must be accepted and kept in

check.

Yet he would succumb to the same faults he warned us about.

David Foster Wallace states in his speech “This Is Water” that we all choosesomething to worship, whether we realize it or not. Wilber would say what we

choose to worship is dependent on the stage or level of consciousness we’ve

developed to. And he would be right.

But what he seems to have missed is that worshipping consciousness development

itself, Wilber’s so-called “second-tier” thinking, leads to the same disastrous

repercussions Wallace warned of: vanity, power, guilt, obsession.

No one is immune.

As humans, we have a tendency to cling to ideologies. Any positive set of

beliefs can quickly turn malevolent once treated as ideology and not an honest

intellectual or experiential pursuit of greater truth. Ideology does in entireeconomic systems and countries, causes religions to massacre thousands, turn

human rights movements into authoritarian sects and makes fools out of

humanity’s most brilliant minds. Einstein famously wasted the second half of

his career trying to calculate a cosmological constant that didn’t exist because

“God doesn’t play dice.”

http://postmasculine.com/this-is-water


14/16



Stay Connected: Follow @iammarkmanson

Wilber’s brilliance will always be a part of me. But what he really taught me is

this: There is no ideology. There is no guru. There is only us, and this, and the

silence.

[ Image credit: susivinh ]

DID YOU LIKE THIS ARTICLE?

Every couple weeks I send out a newsletter with new articles and exclusive

content for readers. It's basically my way of keeping in touch with you and

letting you know what's going on. Your information is protected and I never

spam.

Subscribe to stay connected.

SHARE

TWEET

GOOGLE+

318,405 people like this. Sign Up to see what your

friends like.Like Sha re

Pinterest

OUR EMAIL ADDRESS

SEND ME THE EBOOK

https://www.facebook.com/campaign/landing.php?campaign_id=137675572948107&partner_id=markmanson.net&placement=like_plugin&extra_1=http%3A%2F%2Fmarkmanson.net%2Fken-wilber&extra_2=SAhttps://plus.google.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fmarkmanson.net%2Fken-wilberhttps://twitter.com/share?original_referer=http%3A%2F%2Fmarkmanson.net%2Fken-wilber&text=The%20Rise%20And%20Fall%20of%20Ken%20Wilber&url=http%3A%2F%2Fmarkmanson.net%2Fken-wilber&via=IAmMarkMansonhttp://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fmarkmanson.net%2Fken-wilberhttps://www.flickr.com/photos/susivinh/6626448401/sizes/lhttps://twitter.com/intent/follow?original_referer=http%3A%2F%2Fmarkmanson.net%2Fken-wilber&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&region=follow_link&screen_name=iammarkmanson&tw_p=followbutton


15/16



RELATED ARTICLES YOU MAY LIKE -

How to 80/20 Your Life Being Special Isn’t So

Special

No, You Can’t Have It All The Three Loves Theory

The Zen Dilemma

http://markmanson.net/the-zen-dilemmahttp://markmanson.net/the-zen-dilemmahttp://markmanson.net/three-loves-theoryhttp://markmanson.net/three-loves-theoryhttp://markmanson.net/you-cant-have-it-allhttp://markmanson.net/you-cant-have-it-allhttp://markmanson.net/being-specialhttp://markmanson.net/being-specialhttp://markmanson.net/80-20-your-lifehttp://markmanson.net/80-20-your-life


16/16


© 2016 Infinity Squared Media LLC Terms and Conditions / Privacy Policy / Affiliates / Contact / Subscribe / Login

SUPPORT THE SITE AND GET

ACCESS TO MORE AMAZING

SHIT

Hi there. This is the part of the website where I put a big toothy grin on my fa

and scream “BUT WAIT! THERE’S MORE!” at you in hopes to hold your

attention for more than 30 milliseconds.

Because wait, there actually is more. If you’d like to learn more about where

some of the ideas from these articles came from and hear my responses to crit

feedback, and if you’re interested in hearing me answer reader questions like I

Anne fucking Landers and talk a bit more about my own experiences, my

business ventures, and what I eat for breakfast on Sundays, well, then there

actually is more. A lot more, actually.

Become a subscriber to the site and get all that extra cool stuff. Just click the

retty, pretty button below to get started.

CLICK ME
https://markmanson.net/subscribehttp://markmanson.net/log-inhttp://markmanson.net/subscribehttp://markmanson.net/contacthttp://markmanson.net/affiliateshttp://markmanson.net/privacy-policyhttp://markmanson.net/terms-and-conditions

the rise and fall of ken wilber

Documents