the residency review committee for urology.doc

29
THE RESIDENCY REVIEW COMMITTEE FOR UROLOGY 515 N State, Ste 2000, Chicago, IL 60610 (312) 755-5000 www.acgme.org FOR NEW APPLICATIONS ONLY GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS APPLICATIONS FOR A NEW PROGRAM: This Program Information Form (PIF) is for programs applying for INITIAL ACCREDITATION ONLY (for Continued Accreditation or re-accreditation, use the CONTINUED ACCREDITATION PIF in conjunction with the Web Accreditation Data System). All sections of the form applicable to the program must be completed in order to be accepted for review. The information provided should describe the proposed program. For items that do not apply indicate N/A in the space provided. Where patient numbers are requested, estimate what you expect will occur. If any requested information is not available, an explanation should be given and it should be so indicated in the appropriate place on the form. Once the forms are complete, number the pages sequentially in the bottom right. Send four complete copies to the executive director of the Residency Review Committee for Urology at the address above. They must be identical and final. Draft copies are not acceptable. The forms should be submitted bound by either sturdy rubber bands or binder clips. Do not place the forms in covers such as two or three ring binders, spiral bound notebooks, or any other form of binding. The program director is responsible for the accuracy of the information supplied in this form and must sign it. It must also be signed by the designated institutional official of the sponsoring institution. Review the Program Requirements for Residency Education in Urology. The Program Requirements or the Institutional Requirements may be downloaded from the ACGME website (www.acgme.org): For word processing questions/problems regarding: -the completion of the form (content), contact the Accreditation Administrator. -the Accreditation Data System, email [email protected]. For a glossary of terms, use the following link – http://www.acgme.org/acWebsite/GME_info/gme_glossary.asp Note that the process takes approximately one year from the time the application is received until it is evaluated by the Residency Review Committee. A site visit will be scheduled during that year. Urology New Application PIF 1

Upload: ringer21

Post on 10-Jul-2015

141 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: THE RESIDENCY REVIEW COMMITTEE FOR UROLOGY.doc

THE RESIDENCY REVIEW COMMITTEE FOR UROLOGY515 N State, Ste 2000, Chicago, IL 60610 • (312) 755-5000 • www.acgme.org

FOR NEW APPLICATIONS ONLY

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

APPLICATIONS FOR A NEW PROGRAM: This Program Information Form (PIF) is for programs applying for INITIAL ACCREDITATION ONLY (for Continued Accreditation or re-accreditation, use the CONTINUED ACCREDITATION PIF in conjunction with the Web Accreditation Data System).

All sections of the form applicable to the program must be completed in order to be accepted for review. The information provided should describe the proposed program. For items that do not apply indicate N/A in the space provided. Where patient numbers are requested, estimate what you expect will occur. If any requested information is not available, an explanation should be given and it should be so indicated in the appropriate place on the form.

Once the forms are complete, number the pages sequentially in the bottom right. Send four complete copies to the executive director of the Residency Review Committee for Urology at the address above. They must be identical and final. Draft copies are not acceptable. The forms should be submitted bound by either sturdy rubber bands or binder clips. Do not place the forms in covers such as two or three ring binders, spiral bound notebooks, or any other form of binding.

The program director is responsible for the accuracy of the information supplied in this form and must sign it. It must also be signed by the designated institutional official of the sponsoring institution.

Review the Program Requirements for Residency Education in Urology. The Program Requirements or the Institutional Requirements may be downloaded from the ACGME website (www.acgme.org):

For word processing questions/problems regarding:

-the completion of the form (content), contact the Accreditation Administrator.

-the Accreditation Data System, email [email protected].

For a glossary of terms, use the following link – http://www.acgme.org/acWebsite/GME_info/gme_glossary.asp

Note that the process takes approximately one year from the time the application is received until it is evaluated by the Residency Review Committee. A site visit will be scheduled during that year.

Urology New Application PIF 1

Page 2: THE RESIDENCY REVIEW COMMITTEE FOR UROLOGY.doc

The following documents should be attached to the application:

1. Overall educational goals for the program

2. Written competency-based goals and objectives for each assignment, at each educational level

3. Current Program Letters of Agreement (PLAs) for each participating site providing an assignment

4. Relevant program policies, including:

a. policies for resident appointment, eligibility, selection, and promotion

b. policies for supervision of residents

c. policies and procedures for resident duty hours and the working environment

d. moonlighting policy

5. Institutional policy for remediation and dismissal of residents, including due process

6. Documentation of resident evaluations including:

a. A blank copy of the forms used for evaluating residents at the end of rotation or similar educational experience

b. A blank copy of the form used to document the semiannual evaluation of the resident with feedback

c. A blank copy of the final (summative) evaluation for each resident that documents the resident’s performance during the final period of education and verifies that the resident has demonstrated sufficient competence to enter practice without direct supervision

7. A blank copy of the form that residents will use to evaluate the faculty

8. A blank copy of the form that residents will use to evaluate the program

9. For single-program institutions (e.g., an institution that sponsors just one accredited program) or an institution with multiple residencies accredited by the same Review Committee, a copy of the resident contract/agreement with the items required by the ACGME numbered according to Institutional Requirement II.D.

10. All of the actual assessment tools that will be used to provide objective assessment of resident competence in Practice-based Learning and Improvement, Interpersonal & Communication Skills, Professionalism, and Systems-based Practice (See assessment methods listed in listed in Section V.3).

11. Have a documents related to conferences: list of guest speakers, or similar material pertinent to the organization of the conferences

Urology New Application PIF 2

Page 3: THE RESIDENCY REVIEW COMMITTEE FOR UROLOGY.doc

THE RESIDENCY REVIEW COMMITTEE FOR UROLOGY515 N State, Ste 2000, Chicago, IL 60610 • (312) 755-5000 • www.acgme.org

Program Name:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

When you have the completed forms, number each page sequentially in the bottom right hand corner. Record this pagination in the Table of Contents and submit this cover page with the completed PIF.

Common PIF1 Page(s)Accreditation Information

Response to Previous CitationsParticipating Sites

Single Program Sponsoring Institutions (If applicable)Program Personnel and Resources

Program Director InformationPhysician Faculty RosterFaculty Curriculum VitaeNon Physician Faculty RosterNon Physician Faculty Curriculum VitaeProgram Resources

Resident AppointmentsEvaluation (Residents, Faculty, Program)Resident Duty HoursResident Scholarly Activities

Specialty Specific PIF Page(s)Patient CareMedical Knowledge

Pediatric UrologyEducational ProgramConferences

Practice-Based Learning and ImprovementInterpersonal and Communication SkillsProfessionalismSystems-Based PracticeLocal Program Directors for Participating SitesClinicsBlock Diagram of Urology ProgramScholarly ActivityEvaluationInstructions for Completion of Urology Surgical Operative Log Forms

Resident and Program Director ResponsibilitiesFrequently Asked Questions

Urology New Application PIF 3

Page 4: THE RESIDENCY REVIEW COMMITTEE FOR UROLOGY.doc

THE RESIDENCY REVIEW COMMITTEE FOR UROLOGY515 N State, Ste 2000, Chicago, IL 60610 • (312) 755-5000 • www.acgme.org

PROGRAM INFORMATION FORM

A. ACCREDITATION INFORMATION

Date:

Title of Program:

Requested Effective Date of Accreditation:

Status of core program, if applicable:

Length of program:

Number of requested resident positions:

The signatures of the director of the program and the designated institutional official attest to the completeness and accuracy of the information provided on these forms.

Name of Program Director:

Signature of Program Director (and date):

Name of Designated Institutional Official (DIO):

Signature of DIO (and date):

1. Respond to Previous Citation(s)

If the program was previously accredited and accreditation was withdrawn within the past two years, provide a brief update on each previous citation and indicate how they have been addressed.

Urology New Application PIF 4

Page 5: THE RESIDENCY REVIEW COMMITTEE FOR UROLOGY.doc

B. PARTICIPATING SITES

SPONSORING INSTITUTION: (The university, hospital, or foundation that has ultimate responsibility for this program.) Name of Sponsor:

Address: Changed since the Last Review?

( ) YES ( ) NO

Single Residency Sponsor? ( ) YES ( ) NOCity, State, Zip code:Type of Institution: (e.g., Teaching Hospital, General Hospital, Medical School) Name of Designated Institutional Official: Name of Chief Executive Officer: Does SPONSOR have an affiliation with a medical school (could be the sponsoring institution)?

( ) YES ( ) NO

If yes, name the medical school below and have an affiliation agreement that describes the effect of these arrangements on this program available. Name of Medical School #1Name of Medical School #2

PRIMARY CLINICAL SITE (Site #1) Name:Address:City, State, Zip Code:Clinical Site? ( ) YES ( ) NOType of Rotation (select one)

Elective ( ) Required ( ) Both ( )

Length of Resident/Fellow Rotations (in months) Year 1: Year 2: Year 3:Year 4:

JCAHO Approved? ( ) YES ( ) NOIf no, explain:

Please duplicate as necessary. PARTICIPATING SITE (Site #2) Name:Address:City, State, Zip Code:Does this site also sponsor its own program in this specialty? ( ) YES ( ) NODoes it participate in any other ACGME-accredited programs in this specialty? ( ) YES ( ) NODistance between #2 & #1: Miles: Minutes:Type of Rotation (select one)

( ) Elective ( ) Required ( ) Both

Length of Resident/Fellow Rotations (in months) Year 1: Year 2: Year 3:Year 4:

Urology New Application PIF 5

Page 6: THE RESIDENCY REVIEW COMMITTEE FOR UROLOGY.doc

1. Single Program Sponsoring Institutions (if applicable)

For those institutions sponsoring a single specialty program or a single core specialty and its dependent subspecialties, the institutional review will be conducted in conjunction with the review of the program. Only programs in these two categories must complete the following questions:

a) Provide an institutional statement that commits the necessary financial, educational, and human resources to support the GME program(s) and provide documentation that the statement has been approved by the governing body, the administration and the teaching staff.

b) Describe the formal method by which a periodic evaluation of the program’s educational quality and compliance with the program requirements will occur. Explain how residents and faculty in the program will be involved in the evaluation process.

c) Describe how the institution will comply with the Institutional Requirements regarding “Resident Eligibility and Selection” and the development of appropriate criteria for the selection, evaluation, promotion and dismissal of residents in accordance with the Program and Institutional Requirements.

d) Summarize how the institution will comply with the ACGME Institutional Requirements regarding resident support, benefits and conditions of employment to include the details of the resident contract or agreement as outlined in the ACGME Institutional Requirements. (Do not append the resident contract/agreement to the PIF but state when it will be given to the residents and applicants. If applicable, have a copy available for verification by the site visitor on the day of the survey with the various items required by the ACGME numbered according to the Institutional Requirements.)

e) Describe in detail the grievance (due process) procedure(s) that will be available to residents, including the composition of the grievance committee, and mechanisms for handling complaints and grievances related to actions which could result in dismissal, non-renewal of a resident’s contract, or other actions that could significantly threaten a resident’s intended career development.

Urology New Application PIF 6

Page 7: THE RESIDENCY REVIEW COMMITTEE FOR UROLOGY.doc

C. PROGRAM PERSONNEL AND RESOURCES

1. Program Director Information

Name: Title: Address: City, State, Zip code:Telephone: FAX: Email:Date First Appointed as Program Director: Will Your Principal Activity Be Devoted to Resident Education? ( ) YES ( ) NOTerm of Program Director Appointment: Date first appointed as faculty member in the program:Percentage of time the program director devotes to the program in the following activities:Clinical Supervision:

Administration: Research: Didactics/Teaching:

Primary Specialty Board Certification: Most Recent Year:Secondary Specialty Board Certification: Most Recent Year: Number of years spent teaching in GME in this specialty:

a) Does the program director approve the selection of program faculty as appropriate?............................................................................................................................( ) YES ( ) NO

b) Will the program director evaluate the faculty and approve the continued participation of program faculty based on evaluation?...............................................................................( ) YES ( ) NO

c) Will the program director comply with the sponsoring institution’s written policies and procedures, including those specified in the Institutional Requirements, for selection, evaluation and promotion of residents, disciplinary action, and supervision of residents?................................( ) YES ( ) NO

d) Is the program director familiar with and does he/she comply with ACGME and RC policies and procedures as outlined in the ACGME Manual of Policies and Procedures? ......( ) YES ( ) NO

Urology New Application PIF 7

Page 8: THE RESIDENCY REVIEW COMMITTEE FOR UROLOGY.doc

2. Physician Faculty Roster

List alphabetically and by site all physician faculty who devote at least 10 hours a week to resident education. Using the form provided below, supply a one page C.V. for each faculty listed.

Name (Position) Degree

Based Primarily at Site #

Primary and Secondary Specialties / Fields

Specialty / Field

Board Certification

(Y/N)†

Most Recent Certification

Date

Years as Faculty

in Specialty

Average Hours Per Week Spent On:

Clinical Supervision Admin

Didactic Teaching Research

(PD)

† Certification for the primary specialty refers to ABMS Board Certification. Certification for the secondary specialty refers to sub-Board certification. If the secondary specialty is a core ACGME specialty (e.g., Internal Medicine), the certification question refers to ABMS Board Certification.

Urology New Application PIF 8

Page 9: THE RESIDENCY REVIEW COMMITTEE FOR UROLOGY.doc

3. Faculty Curriculum Vitae

First Name:

MI:Last Name:

Present Position:Medical School Name:Degree Awarded:

Year Completed:

Graduate Medical Education Program Name(s); include all residencies and fellowships:

Specialty/FieldDate From:

To:

Certification and Re-Certification Information Current Licensure Data

SpecialtyCertification Year

Re-Certification Year

State Date of Expiration

Academic Appointments - List the past ten years, beginning with your current position. Start Date End Date Description of Position(s)

Present

Concise Summary of Role in Program:

Current Professional Activities/Committees:

Selected Bibliography - Most representative Peer Reviewed Publications/Journal Articles from the last 5 years (limit of 10): Selected Review Articles, Chapters and/or Textbooks (Limit of 10 in the last 5 years):

Participation in Local, Regional, and National Activities/Presentations (Limit of 10 in the last 5 years):

If not ABMS board certified, explain equivalent qualifications:

Urology New Application PIF 9

Page 10: THE RESIDENCY REVIEW COMMITTEE FOR UROLOGY.doc

4. Non Physician Faculty Roster

List alphabetically the non-physician faculty who provide required instruction or supervision of residents in the program.

Name (Position) Degree

Based Primarily at

Site # Specialty / Field Role In Program

Years as Faculty in Specialty

5. Program Resources

a) How will the program ensure that faculty (physician and nonphysician) have sufficient time to supervise and teach residents? Please mention time spent in activities such as conferences, rounds, journal clubs, etc. if relevant.

b) Briefly describe the educational and clinical resources available for resident education.[The answer must include how specialty specific reference materials are accessible. It should also include resources provided by the program and the institution.]

Urology New Application PIF 10

Page 11: THE RESIDENCY REVIEW COMMITTEE FOR UROLOGY.doc

D. RESIDENT APPOINTMENTS

Positions per yearTotal Number of Requested Positions

1. Describe how residents will be informed about their assignments and duties during residency. [The answer must confirm that there are goals and objectives for each assignment and for each year, and that these will be readily available (hard copy, electronically, listserv, etc.) to all residents.]

2. Will there be other learners (such as residents from other specialties, subspecialty fellows, nurse practitioners, PhD or MD students) in the program, sharing educational or clinical experiences with the residents? If yes, describe the impact those other learners will have on the program’s residents.

3. Describe how the program will handle complaints or concerns the residents raise. (The answer must describe the mechanism by which individual residents can address concerns in a confidential and protected manner as well as steps taken to minimize fear of intimidation or retaliation.)

Urology New Application PIF 11

Page 12: THE RESIDENCY REVIEW COMMITTEE FOR UROLOGY.doc

E. EVALUATION (RESIDENTS, FACULTY, PROGRAM)

1. Will residents be evaluated on their performance following each learning experience?............................................................................................................................( ) YES ( ) NO

If no, explain

2. Will these evaluations be documented (in written or electronic format)?..............( ) YES ( ) NO

If no, explain

3. Using the table below (add rows as needed):

a) provide the methods of evaluation used for assessing resident competence in each of the six required ACGME competencies and,

b) identify the evaluators for each method (e.g., “performance in patient care is evaluated by global forms completed by faculty and senior residents, observed histories and physicals by the ward attending and the continuity preceptor; medical knowledge is assessed through the In-Training Examination and an evidence-based journal club evaluated by the PD, etc.”)

Examples of assessment methods: direct observation, videotaped/recorded assessment, global assessment, simulations/models, record/chart review, standardized patient examination, multisource assessment, project assessment, patient survey, in-house written examination, in-training examination, oral exam, objective structured clinical examination, structured case discussions, anatomic or animal models, role-play or simulations, formal oral exam, practice/billing audit, review of case or procedure log, review of patient outcomes, review of drug prescribing, resident experience narrative and any other applicable assessment method

Examples of types of evaluators: self, program director, nurse, faculty supervisor, medical student, faculty member, allied health professional, resident supervisor, patient, other residents, technicians, clerical staff, evaluation committee, consultants

Competency Assessment Method(s) Evaluator(s)Patient Care

Medical Knowledge

Practice-based learning & Improvement

Interpersonal & Communication Skills

Professionalism

Urology New Application PIF 12

Page 13: THE RESIDENCY REVIEW COMMITTEE FOR UROLOGY.doc

Competency Assessment Method(s) Evaluator(s)

Systems-based Practice

4. Describe how evaluators will be educated to use the assessment methods listed above so that residents are evaluated fairly and consistently.

Limit your response to 400 words.

5. Describe how residents will be informed of the performance criteria on which they will be evaluated.

Limit your response to 400 words.

6. Describe the system that ensures that faculty will complete written evaluations of residents in a timely manner following each rotation or educational experience.

Limit your response to 400 words.

7. Describe the process that will be used to complete and document written semiannual resident evaluations, including the mechanism for reviewing results of the evaluation (e.g., who meets with the residents and how the results are documented in resident files).

Limit your response to 400 words.

8. Describe the system that residents will use to provide annual confidential written evaluations of the teaching faculty. [The answer must include evaluations at least once per year, the steps taken to maintain confidentiality, and the process by which evaluations are sought.]

Limit your response to 400 words.

9. Describe the system that the program (or department, if applicable) will use to provide evaluation and feedback to the teaching faculty.

Limit your response to 400 words.

10. Describe the approach that will be used for program evaluation, including how the program will ensure that residents provide confidential written evaluation of the program at least annually.

Limit your response to 400 words.

Urology New Application PIF 13

Page 14: THE RESIDENCY REVIEW COMMITTEE FOR UROLOGY.doc

F. RESIDENT DUTY HOURS

1. Excluding call from home, what is the projected average number of hours on duty per week per resident?

2. What is the projected average number of days per week of in-house call (excluding home call and night float) which residents will be assigned?

3. How will the faculty provide appropriate supervision of residents in patient care activities?

4. How will the program ensure that residents comply with the ACGME duty hour standards? Please be specific as regards the duty hour weekly limit, time spent on-call, days free each week, length of duty shifts, periods of rest between duty shifts, and moonlighting policies, as applicable.

5. How will the program ensure that residents recognize the signs of fatigue and sleep deprivation?

6. How will the program ensure that resident education is not adversely affected by heavy service obligations?

Urology New Application PIF 14

Page 15: THE RESIDENCY REVIEW COMMITTEE FOR UROLOGY.doc

G. RESIDENTS’ SCHOLARLY ACTIVITIES

Will the program offer residents the opportunity to participate in scholarly activities? If yes, briefly describe the opportunity and the expectations about residents’ participation. [The answer must include which research skills are taught in the curriculum.]

Urology New Application PIF 15

Page 16: THE RESIDENCY REVIEW COMMITTEE FOR UROLOGY.doc

RESIDENCY REVIEW COMMITTEE FOR UROLOGY515 N State, Ste 2000, Chicago, IL 60610 • (312) 755-5000 • www.acgme.org

SPECIALTY SPECIFIC PROGRAM INFORMATION FORM

I. PATIENT CARE

Describe resident responsibility under supervision for total patient care, including admission, initial evaluation, diagnosis, selection of therapy and management of complications. Include with this description resident responsibility for continuity of care with private/non-private patients; night/week-end duty; and long-term care.

Urology New Application PIF 16

Page 17: THE RESIDENCY REVIEW COMMITTEE FOR UROLOGY.doc

II. MEDICAL KNOWLEDGE

A. Pediatric Urology

Provide the following information for each site where residents are assigned pediatric experiences. If more than one site provides pediatric experience, duplicate this page.

Site:12-month period for data from

to

Number of Pediatric Urology Operative Procedures

1. Pediatric Urology Clinic Visits

Name of Clinic

Average # of Pediatric Urology Patients seen each week

# Clinics Seen (1/2 Days)

# of Clinics that Residents Attend

2. Other Residents/Fellows Assigned to this Site for Education in Pediatric Urology

Residents Name of ProgramAssignment

Length in Months Total # per Year# Present at Any

One TimeFrom the urology programFrom other programs:Fellows:Total

3 Pediatric Urology Faculty at this Site:

Number of pediatric urologists involved in pediatric urology education with urology residents at this site: Number of pediatric urologists who devote less than half-time per week to the urology residency program:

B. Educational Program

Please provide a complete, logical and accurate description of the educational program including the goals and objectives for each of the resident assignments.

1. Provide a narrative description for the urology program to include the educational philosophy. List the goals and objectives for urology resident education for each resident assignment.

2. Provide a narrative description for each year of the urology educational program. Describe the resident assignments with respect to their duties and responsibilities in all sites; include the length of all assignments and the goals and objectives for each assignment. Explain how graded responsibility and continuity of care are implemented.

Urology New Application PIF 17

Page 18: THE RESIDENCY REVIEW COMMITTEE FOR UROLOGY.doc

C. Conferences

1. Regularly Scheduled Conferences For the previous 12 months, list the conferences, rounds, combined mortality and morbidity conference for all participating hospitals, urological radiology, urologic pathology, journal review, etc. Identify the site by NAME. For each conference indicate whether attendance is: O=Optional, R=Required. Under "Frequency" identify how often the conference is offered. Under "Conference Leader" identify the person(s) by title.

Conference Name of Site R or O Frequency Conference Leader

2. Additional Conferences Held: For the previous 12 months, list the additional conference. Identify the site by NAME. For each conference indicate whether attendance is: O=Optional, R=Required. Under "Frequency" identify how often the conference is offered. Under "Conference Leader" identify the person(s) by title.

Conference Name of Site R or O Frequency Conference Leader

3. Insert a narrative describing the conferences. Include the general organization and structure of the conferences and the responsibility of the residents and faculty in preparing and presenting conferences.

Urology New Application PIF 18

Page 19: THE RESIDENCY REVIEW COMMITTEE FOR UROLOGY.doc

4. For the site visit, have a documents related to conferences: list of guest speakers, or similar material pertinent to the organization of the conferences.

Urology New Application PIF 19

Page 20: THE RESIDENCY REVIEW COMMITTEE FOR UROLOGY.doc

Please describe the planned program learning activities which will provide experience in the general competencies for residents. Examples of learning activities include: didactic lecture, assigned reading, seminar, self-directed learning module, conference, small group discussion, workshop, online module, journal club, project, case discussion, one-on-one mentoring.

III. PRACTICE-BASED LEARNING AND IMPROVEMENT (PR IV.A.5.c))

1. Describe one learning activity in which residents will engage to identify strengths, deficiencies, and limits in their knowledge and expertise (self-reflection and self-assessment); set learning and improvement goals; identify and perform appropriate learning activities to achieve self-identified goals (life-long learning).

Limit your response to 400 words.

2. Describe one learning activity in which residents will engage to develop the skills needed to use information technology to locate, appraise, and assimilate evidence from scientific studies and apply it to their patients’ health problems. The description should include:

a) locating informationb) using information technologyc) appraising informationd) assimilating evidence information (from scientific studies)e) applying information to patient care

Limit your response to 400 words.

3. Describe one planned quality improvement activity or project in which at least one resident will participate that will require the resident to demonstrate an ability to analyze, improve and change practice or patient care. Describe planning, implementation, evaluation and provisions of faculty support and supervision that will guide this process.

Limit your response to 400 words.

4. Describe how residents will:

a) develop teaching skills necessary to educate patients, families, students, and other residents;b) teach patients, families, and others; and, c) receive and incorporate formative evaluation feedback into daily practice. (If a specific tool is

used to evaluate these skills have it available for review by the site visitor.)

Limit your response to 400 words.

Urology New Application PIF 20

Page 21: THE RESIDENCY REVIEW COMMITTEE FOR UROLOGY.doc

IV. INTERPERSONAL AND COMMUNICATION SKILLS (PR IV.A.5.d))

1. Describe one learning activity in which residents will develop competence in communicating effectively with patients and families across a broad range of socioeconomic and cultural backgrounds, and with other physicians, other health professionals, and health related agencies.

Limit your response to 400 words.

2. Describe one learning activity in which residents will develop their skills and habits to work effectively as a member or leader of a health care team or other professional group. In the example, identify the members of the team, responsibilities of the team members, and how team members communicate to accomplish responsibilities.

Limit your response to 400 words.

3. Explain (a) how the completion of comprehensive, timely and legible medical records will be monitored and evaluated, and (b) the mechanism that will be used for providing residents feedback on their ability to maintain medical records.

Limit your response to 400 words.

Urology New Application PIF 21

Page 22: THE RESIDENCY REVIEW COMMITTEE FOR UROLOGY.doc

V. PROFESSIONALISM (PR IV.A.5.e))

1. Describe one learning activity, other than lecture, by which residents will develop a commitment to carrying out professional responsibilities and an adherence to ethical principles.

Limit your response to 400 words.

2. How will the program promote professional behavior by the residents and faculty?

Limit your response to 400 words.

3. How will lapses in these behaviors be addressed?

Limit your response to 400 words.

Urology New Application PIF 22

Page 23: THE RESIDENCY REVIEW COMMITTEE FOR UROLOGY.doc

VI. SYSTEMS-BASED PRACTICE (PR IV.A.5.f))

1. Describe the learning activities through which residents will achieve competence in the elements of systems-based practice. Examples of such activities would include: work effectively in various health care delivery settings and systems, coordinate patient care within the health care system; incorporate considerations of cost-containment and risk-benefit analysis in patient care; advocate for quality patient care and optimal patient care systems; and work in interprofessional teams to enhance patient safety and care quality.

Limit your response to 400 words.

2. Describe an activity that will provide experiential learning in identifying system errors.

Limit your response to 400 words.

Urology New Application PIF 23

Page 24: THE RESIDENCY REVIEW COMMITTEE FOR UROLOGY.doc

VII. LOCAL PROGRAM DIRECTORS FOR PARTICIPATING SITES

Complete the information for each site participating in the program. Insert additional pages as required if more than four sites participate with the program.

Participating Site Name:Name of Local Site Director:Approximate hours per week devoted to residency program:Describe briefly the mode of appointment, period of service, and responsibilities of the Program Director in the Urology Program:

Participating Site Name:Name of Local Site Director:Approximate hours per week devoted to residency program:Describe briefly the mode of appointment, period of service, and responsibilities of the Program Director in the Urology Program:

Participating Site Name:Name of Local Site Director:Approximate hours per week devoted to residency program:Describe briefly the mode of appointment, period of service, and responsibilities of the Program Director in the Urology Program:

Urology New Application PIF 24

Page 25: THE RESIDENCY REVIEW COMMITTEE FOR UROLOGY.doc

VIII. CLINICS

Provide a brief description of each clinic used in the urology educational program. Provide the following information:

1. What is the general organization of the clinic? What radiologic, cystoscopic, and other special facilities are available?

2. What are the resident objectives for participation in this clinic?

3. How are the residents supervised? Are all residents supervised at all times?

4. Is there opportunity for following inpatients? If so, how is this accomplished?

Urology New Application PIF 25

Page 26: THE RESIDENCY REVIEW COMMITTEE FOR UROLOGY.doc

IX. BLOCK DIAGRAM OF UROLOGY PROGRAM

Complete the block diagram below outlining the typical resident assignment (for one resident only) in your program. Supply this information for the urology years only. Do NOT include the pre-urology years. For each assignment indicate: a. The type of experience: e.g., inpatient private service, inpatient non-private service, outpatient research, etc. b. The name of the site(s) used for each experience.

EXAMPLE:6 Months 3 Months 3 Months

URO-1 Non-Private (University)OP (University)Specialties IP (VA)

Private Service (St. Mary’s)

BLOCK DIAGRAM OF THE PROGRAM FOR THE UROLOGY YEARS ONLY:

URO-1

URO-2

URO-3

URO-4

Urology New Application PIF 26

Page 27: THE RESIDENCY REVIEW COMMITTEE FOR UROLOGY.doc

X. SCHOLARLY ACTIVITY

Answer each of the following questions for every site providing research experience for the urology residency program.

Site:

1. Are laboratories for research available for the Department of Urology? ............YES ( ) NO ( )

If yes, describe briefly the research space and important special research facilities in use. Do not list all the items of equipment.

2. Insert a list of all clinical and basic research projects conducted by urology faculty and indicate in which ones the urology residents participate.

3. Insert a list of the past three years’ presentations and publications for the urology faculty and residents. Provide no more than a maximum of 25 publications for the whole group that reflects the interests and activities of the faculty and residents. UNDERLINE the names of all residents so that the Committee can evaluate resident involvement in faculty research (Do not submit reprints).

4. How does the program provide residents with exposure to research sufficient to result in an understanding of the basic principles of study design, performance, analysis, and reporting?

5. Describe resident participation in educational meetings outside the program, i.e., attendance at meetings and conferences, visits by external authorities, and presentations at scientific meetings.

Urology New Application PIF 27

Page 28: THE RESIDENCY REVIEW COMMITTEE FOR UROLOGY.doc

XI. EVALUATION

How has the program used the results of the American Board of Urology Qualifying and Certifying Examinations to modify and improve the educational program?

Urology New Application PIF 28

Page 29: THE RESIDENCY REVIEW COMMITTEE FOR UROLOGY.doc

XII. INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETION OF UROLOGY SURGICAL OPERATIVE LOG FORMS

A. Resident and Program Director Responsibilities:

At the conclusion of urology residency program, each chief resident must provide the Program Director with the SIGNED surgical log documenting his/her 36 or 48 months of clinical urology operative experience. It is the resident's responsibility to keep copies of dictated operating room reports on all cases in which he/she is listed as the responsible surgeon. The operative log submitted to the RRC must be countersigned by the Program Director who will attest to the accuracy of the data submitted. Logs without BOTH the resident and Program Director signatures will be returned.

B. Frequently asked questions:

1. Can a resident obtain credit as surgeon for more than one operation when performing a surgical procedure?

In most cases the answer is no. For example, the resident who performs a radical nephrectomy cannot take credit for a nephrectomy, adrenalectomy, and retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy. However, there are some multi-component operations that incorporate individual procedures that are commonly performed as individual operations, i.e. pelvic lymphadenectomy. In certain cases credit for more than one procedure can be obtained.

Approved Examples of Exceptions:Operations ReportRadical Retropubic Prostatectomy 1 Radical prostatectomy and

1 Pelvic lymphadenectomyRadical Cystectomy with urinary continent diversion or reconstruction

1 Radical cystectomy and

1 Pelvic lymphadenectomyand either: a.) conduit, ileal or colonic;b.) any continent cutaneous diversionc.) orthotopic neobladder, any type

Urinary Diversion with Transureteroureterostomy 1 Transureteroureterostomy and1 Ureteroneocystostomy with bladder flap

2. Can two residents obtain credit as surgeon during one operation?

Yes, in certain circumstances. When one resident is performing a radical prostatectomy, he can permit another resident to make the incision and perform the pelvic lymphadenectomy before performing the radical prostatectomy. In this case, one resident is the assistant on the lymphadenectomy and the surgeon on the prostatectomy, and the other resident is the surgeon on the lymphadenectomy and the assistant on the prostatectomy.

In cases where a bilateral operation is performed, two residents can obtain credit for unilateral procedures, e.g. bilateral orchiopexy, adrenalectomy, simple nephrectomy, ureteral re-implantation.

3. What is the definition of surgeon and assistant?

The resident who performs 50% or more of a case is considered the surgeon. Assistant refers only to first assistant.

Urology New Application PIF 29