the research process

45
STATISTICS LECTURE NUMBER 2: THE RESEARCH PROCESS AND WHY DO OPTOMS AND VISION SCIENTISTS NEED STATS? Given by: Dr Kirsten Challinor 1

Upload: k-challinor

Post on 12-Apr-2017

230 views

Category:

Education


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Research Process

1

STATISTICS LECTURE NUMBER 2: THE RESEARCH PROCESS AND WHY DO OPTOMS AND VISION SCIENTISTS NEED STATS? Given by: Dr Kirsten Challinor

Page 2: The Research Process

COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA

Copyright Regulations 1969

WARNING

This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of theUniversity of New South Wales pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (the Act).

The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright

protection under the Act.

Do not remove this notice.

Page 3: The Research Process

3

IN THE LAST LECTURE…

Page 4: The Research Process

4

EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE

EBP

(Hoffman, 2010)

EBP is the combination of the best available evidence from research, the patient’s preferences/circumstances, the clinical environment and the practitioner’s expertise.

Page 5: The Research Process

5

IN SUMMARY-PROCESS OF EBP

ASK formulating answerable questions

ACQUIREsearching for the

best evidence

APPRAISE critically assess

the evidence

APPLYthe appraised evidence

to patient / practice

AUDITevaluating outcome of EBP

process

(Dawes, 2005)

Covered in your tutorial homework

https://www.eboptometry.com/

Page 7: The Research Process

7

TODAY’S OUTLINE Explanation of each of the steps in the

research process flowchart Types of data Generating and testing theories Measurement error Validity Reliability

Page 8: The Research Process

8

WHY DO WE NEED STATISTICS?

Page 9: The Research Process

9http://xkcd.com/1161/

Page 10: The Research Process

10

APPRAISEEvaluating the relevant research evidence, to find the highest quality (most reliable, or valid) evidence available relevant to your question.

Critical appraisal is the process of assessing and interpreting evidence by systematically considering its validity and its relevance to the question. Internal validity: the extent to which the research is

reliable. External validity: is an indication of the generalisability

of the findings.

WE NEED STATISTICS TO

CONDUCT THE APPRAISIAL STEP

OF THE EBP PROCESS

In lec 1 we learnt that

appraise is

Page 11: The Research Process

11

SCIENCE AND WHY WE NEED STATISTICS Provide knowledge and understanding of how

the world works by providing EVIDENCE Development of technology Philosophy No other species of animals is capable of this!

A formal process of investigation of cause and effect: - for that we need numbers!

Page 12: The Research Process

12

APPRAISEQuestions Yes NoWere subjects randomized? The study is not likely to be biased by

subject grouping. Subject allocation may cause bias.

Was there a control? Is the control group within this study, or historical?

There is unlikely to be a placebo effect in the treatment group. We can be less sure of this, though, if the control group data are taken from a previous study.

Subjects were in therapy, but there is no comparison with those not in therapy, so we cannot know to what extent any treatment effect is due to the treatment.

Is the population clinically relevant for my application?

Findings may be population-specific. The findings may apply to one population but not to the population in which the therapy is to be applied.

Is attrition (reduction in numbers) described?

If attrition rate is low, the findings are not confounded by this factor.

We do not know the results in subjects who withdraw from the study.

Were experimenters and subjects “blind” in this trial?

The findings are not biased by expectation of outcomes.

The experimenters and the subjects may have unintentionally or otherwise affected the outcome.

Are the subject groups comparable? The subject groups were equal at baseline, so are likely to have been similarly affected.

Outcomes in the groups may differ due to factors other than the treatment.

Was subject treatment equal across groups, apart from the therapy?

The subject groups were equal in all respects apart from the therapy.

Outcomes in the groups may differ due to factors other than the treatment.

Are the results both clinically and statistically significant?

The results are clinically relevant. Results may be statistically significant, but have no clinical significance. They may not be statistically significant, in which case there is no effect.

http://www.eboptometry.comEBP in actionStep 3: Appraise

Page 14: The Research Process

14

THE RESEARCH PROCESS

Page 15: The Research Process

15

THE RESEARCH PROCESS

This flowchart is from your chapter 1 in your Andy Field textbook (see last slide).

Page 16: The Research Process

16

INITIAL OBSERVATION Find something that needs

explaining Observe the real world Read other research Investigation

Test the concept: collect data Collect data to see whether your

hunch is correct To do this you need to define

variables Anything that can be measured and

can differ across entities or time. What is being measured? What is

being manipulated?

Page 17: The Research Process

17

THE RESEARCH PROCESS

This flowchart is from your chapter 1 in your Andy Field textbook (see last slide).

Page 18: The Research Process

18

GENERATING AND TESTING THEORIES• Theories

– An idea about a general principle or set of principles that explain known findings about a topic and from which new hypotheses can be generated.

• Hypothesis– A prediction from a theory.– E.g. the number of people turning up for a Big

Brother audition that have narcissistic personality disorder will be higher than the general level (1%) in the population.

• Falsification– The act of disproving a theory or hypothesis.

Page 19: The Research Process

RESEARCH HYPOTHESIS

Hypothesis = A proposition for reasoning = A suggestion as to why something might be as it is = A prediction from a theory.

A testable statement of the state of the world.

Question to class. Is this a testable statement?

“The Beatles were the most influential band ever”.

Good theories produce hypotheses that are scientific statements.Scientific statements are ones that can be verified with reference to empirical evidence.

Page 20: The Research Process

20

ACTIVITYTuring a research question into a testable

hypothesisi) Identify if each statement in the list below is a scientific

statement or not? Remember that scientific statements be can be proved/

are testable.ii) For the statements that are not testable, can you

change their wording to make them scientific?

List of statements• Chocolate is the best food.• Watching television makes you happy.• Cricket is the world’s most popular sport to watch.• Coke is the worst drink.

Page 21: The Research Process

21

THE RESEARCH PROCESS

Page 22: The Research Process

22

DATA COLLECTION : WHAT TO MEASURE?Hypothesis:

– Ice cream makes you happy (produces endorphins).

Independent Variable– The proposed cause– A predictor variable– A manipulated variable (in experiments)– Ice cream in the hypothesis above

Dependent Variable– The proposed effect– An outcome variable– Measured not manipulated (in experiments)– Endorphins in the hypothesis above

Page 23: The Research Process

23

LEVELS OF MEASUREMENT – NOT ALL DATA ARE THE SAME

Categorical (entities are divided into distinct categories):

– Binary variable: There are only two categories• e.g. dead or alive.

– Nominal variable: There are more than two categories

• e.g. whether someone is an omnivore, vegetarian, vegan, or fruitarian.

– Ordinal variable: The same as a nominal variable but the categories have a logical order

• e.g. whether people got a fail, a pass, a merit or a distinction in their exam.

Page 24: The Research Process

24

Continuous (entities get a distinct score and can take on any value along a scale):

– Interval variable: Equal intervals on the variable represent equal differences in the property being measured

• e.g. the difference between 6 and 8 is equivalent to the difference between 13 and 15.

– Ratio variable: The same as an interval variable, but the ratios of scores on the scale must also make sense

• e.g. a score of 16 on an anxiety scale means that the person is, in reality, twice as anxious as someone scoring 8.

Page 25: The Research Process

25

MEASUREMENT ERROR Measurement is imperfect!

Measurement error The discrepancy between the actual value we’re

trying to measure, and the number we use to represent that value.

Example: You (in reality) weigh 80 kg. You stand on your bathroom scales and they say

83 kg. The measurement error is 3 kg.

www.paduiblog.com

Page 26: The Research Process

26

Page 27: The Research Process

27

VALIDITY• Whether an instrument measures what it set

out to measure.• Content validity

– Evidence that the content of a test corresponds to the content of the construct it was designed to cover

• Ecological validity– Evidence that the results of a study, experiment

or test can be applied, and allow inferences, to real-world conditions.

Part of the appraisal step of the

EBP process.

Page 28: The Research Process

28

RELIABILITY Reliability

The ability of the measure to produce the same results under the same conditions.

Test-Retest Reliability The ability of a measure to produce consistent

results when the same entities are tested at two different points in time.

Page 29: The Research Process

29

VALID? RELIABLE?

Page 30: The Research Process

TYPES OF RESEARCH Correlational research:

– Observing what naturally goes on in the world without directly interfering with it.

Cross-sectional research:– This term implies that data come

from people at different age points with different people representing each age point.

Experimental research:– One or more variable is

systematically manipulated to see their effect (alone or in combination) on an outcome variable.

– Statements can be made about cause and effect.

Page 32: The Research Process

32

EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH METHODSCause and Effect (Hume, 1748)

Cause and effect must occur close together in time (contiguity);

The cause must occur before an effect does; The effect should never occur without the presence of the

cause.Confounding variables: the ‘Tertium Quid’

A variable (that we may or may not have measured) other than the predictor variables that potentially affects an outcome variable.

E.g. The relationship between breast implants and suicide is confounded by self esteem.

Ruling out confounds (Mill, 1865) An effect should be present when the cause is present and that

when the cause is absent the effect should be absent also. Control conditions: the cause is absent.

Page 33: The Research Process

33

METHODS OF DATA COLLECTION• Between-group/Between-subject/independent

– Different entities in experimental conditions

• Repeated measures (within-subject)– The same entities take part in all experimental

conditions.– Economical– Practice effects– Fatigue

Page 34: The Research Process

34

TYPES OF VARIATION• Systematic Variation

– Differences in performance created by a specific experimental manipulation.

• Unsystematic Variation– Differences in performance created by unknown

factors.• Age, Gender, IQ, Time of day, Measurement error etc.

• Randomization– Minimizes unsystematic variation.

Page 35: The Research Process

35

THE RESEARCH PROCESS

Page 37: The Research Process

37

TYPES OF DATA ANALYSIS Quantitative Methods

Testing theories using numbers Measurement Cause and effect – direct manipulations

http://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/423/what-is-your-favorite-data-analysis-

cartoon

Page 38: The Research Process

38

TYPES OF DATA ANALYSIS Qualitative Methods

Testing theories using language Magazine articles/Interviews Conversations Newspapers Media broadcasts

Page 39: The Research Process

RESEARCH PROCESS SUMMARY

Page 40: The Research Process

40

FURTHER INFO/ADDITIONAL MATERIAL1) Spend some time looking at the textbook website. Set up mobile study if you like (10mins) http://www.uk.sagepub.com/field4e/study/default.htm

2) Hook up to EBP social media (10 mins)Twitter examples @EBPoptometry @EvidenceMatters @EBMOnline @cochranecollab

Online examples http://www.badscience.net/about-dr-ben-goldacre/ http://www.facebook.com/evidencebasedoptometry http://www.cochrane.org/about-us http://evidencebasedmedicine.com.au/

Page 41: The Research Process

41

FURTHER INFO/ADDITIONAL MATERIAL CONT3) Watch this TED talk (14 mins): http://www.ted.com/talks/ben_goldacre_battling_bad_science.html

4) In the talk above, Goldacre talks about Placebos. What is the placebo effect? Find a good definition and write a few sentences for yourself about what a placebo is. (10 mins) http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0058247

5) Read the Sicily statement (Dawes et al, 2005). (25 mins). http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/5/1

Page 42: The Research Process

42

ALWAYS REMEMBER: “THE PLURAL OF

ANECDOTE IS NOT DATA”https://

sites.google.com/site/skepticalmedicine/the-plural-of-anecdote-is-not-data

Anecdote - a short account of a particular incident or event, especially of an interesting or amusing nature.

Data - a series of observations, measurements, or facts; information

Page 44: The Research Process

44

COLDPLAY PARAODY https://

www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUW0Q8tXVUc