the research ethics review process at sjghc [presented at research readiness education program,...
TRANSCRIPT
The Research Ethics Review Process
at SJGHC[Presented at Research Readiness Education Program, SJOGHC Subiaco, 12 August 2015]
Ms Gorette De JesusExecutive Officer, SJGHC HREC
Outline• Overview: SJG Human Research Ethics Committee
(HREC) & its Scientific Review Sub-Committee (SRC)
• SJGHC Research Governance Framework– 3 Pathways for Ethical Review of “Higher Risk”, “Low Risk”
and “Negligible Risk” Research– “Human QI” Projects for Ethical Review– COMMON ISSUES & KEY POINTERS with Submissions
• Where to go for further info & assistance
• Questions
Overview of SJGHC HREC
• SJGHC HREC: constituted & operates according to National Health & Medical Research Council (NHMRC) National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (2007).
• SJGHC: certified under NHMRC National Certification Scheme for multi-centre ethical review processes.
SJGHC HREC: Key Features
• Aim of SJGHC HREC: Facilitate & support the development of a strong culture of research ethics within SJGHC. - Ethical decision-making is guided by our Catholic moral principles and values.
• Single Stream Submission: one submission for research conducted throughout all SJG Divisions/Hospitals.
• Work together with researchers & SJGHC participating sites/Divisions: excellence in research & ethical conduct
Overview of SRC
GOOD SCIENCE IS ETHICAL BY DESIGN AND CONDUCT
• Scientific Review Sub-Committee (SRC)– Review for scientific merit (validity & safety) – Review for appropriate use of SJGHC biospecimens (& related
health data)– Advises on research design & process– Makes recommendations to SJGHC HREC for approval or
otherwise.
Overview of SJGHC HREC & SRC
3 Pathways of Ethical Review for Research
• “Higher Risk” Research (risk of harm) – Formal/Full review
• “Low Risk” Research (discomfort) – Expedited review • “Negligible Risk” Research (inconvenience) – Exempt from
review
10
Checklists for Research
Ethical Review of QI Projects• Fine line between “research” (ie research question) & “quality
improvement” (QI) (for internal evaluation purposes).
• ALL Quality Improvement (QI) should be subjected to the same ethical principles as research:
- Research Merit & Integrity- Justice- Beneficience- Respect
• QI Projects can be described as:- “Pure QI” (processes, systems/programs) = NO HREC
review.- “Human QI” (data about/samples from people) = HREC
review.
• Determine risk of “Human QI” & thus pathway of ethical review.
Checklists for ethical consideration of QI Projects
Participating Site Operational Approval (PSOA)
• 1st Step: Discuss proposed study with Exec of each SJGHC participating site (approval in principle).
• Complete PSOA in discussion with each SJGHC participating site.
• PSOA includes logistical questions about how study will occur at SJGHC, what resources will be required.
• Ensures “logistics” sorted out, AND research proposal aligns with Mission, values & strategic priorities.
Information & Advice for Researchers Making New Submissions
• SJGHC Research Handbook should be READ - NOT printed out. All forms & guides listed as separate docs throughout SJGHC webpages.
• Information & Advice for Researchers Making New Submissions is a dot-point summary based on frequently asked questions (FAQs) about new research submissions.
• Call SJGHC Ethics Office.- to determine WHO to discuss PSOA with at various
SJGHC Divisions/Hospitals. - to plan research submission.
COMMON ISSUES & KEY POINTERS with Submissions
1. “I’m just doing an audit. It doesn’t need ethical review.” – Fine line between audit/QI & research. Internal review
only OR Research question/hypothesis?– Same Ethical Principles should apply to ALL QI!– “Pure QI” or “Human QI”? – Checklist to determine risk level of “Human QI”, then
follow relevant pathway of review. – Intend to publish? – QI projects with more rigor can make great research!
COMMON ISSUES & KEY POINTERS with Submissions
2. “It’s a low risk study, so it doesn’t need much of a research protocol.”
– Good science = ethical research – Avoid “fishing expeditions”: what is Research
question/research hypothesis? – Data analysis IMPORTANT. – Seek advice of a Biostatistician early on.
COMMON ISSUES & KEY POINTERS with Submissions
3. “Can I submit another Ethics Application other than the NEAF or SJGHC Low Risk Application Form?”
– YES, absolutely. No need for duplication. – Cover letter to detail SJGHC site specific details.– OR amend existing NEAF/application form to include
SJGHC site specific details. – Compare against relevant SJGHC Checklist. – Where possible, cooperate in completing submission
paperwork to Ethics eg. where research conducted over more than one SJGHC site.
COMMON ISSUES & KEY POINTERS with Submissions
4. “When is the best time to submit my study?” – No submission date for “low risk” or “negligible risk.” – If approaching a SRC or HREC meeting, may table “low
risk” study at meeting.– Submission dates for “high risk.”– Submission dates approx. a month before HREC meeting.– PLANNING AHEAD CRUCIAL. Early contact with Ethics
Office encouraged.
COMMON ISSUES & KEY POINTERS with Submissions
5. “What should a Participant Information & Consent Form (PICF) look like?”
– COMMENSURATE WITH THE RISK OF THE STUDY.– Brief & concise. – Plain language & seek consumer input.– Approved “pregnancy wording” as per SJGHC’s requirements. – Consent for biospecimen collection & Genetic sub-studies:
Ethically defensible plan (S3.5.1 NS) & “researchers should recognise that data stored in an identifiable form cannot be used in research that is exempt from ethical review.” (S3.2.10 NS)
– Date, version # & site (if more than one site)– Suggested Proformas in SJGHC Research Handbook.
COMMON ISSUES & KEY POINTERS with Submissions
6. “When can I start the research?” – Need “ethical approval” and “final approval.” – Final approval requires signed PSOA from each SJGHC
participating site.– High risk research also needs SJGHC legal approval of
insurance, indemnity & contractual arrangements. – Submit Insur. Certificate, Indemnity & CTRA ASAP!– Approvals confirmed in writing. – Final Approval letter issued by SJGHC GDMS, cc’ed SJGHC
participating site(s).
Where to go: further info & assistance• SJGHC Research Handbook – is SOPs
• Ethics webpage: – www.sjog.org.au/research/human_research_ethics.aspx– Compass, under “Organisation”, “Ethics”
• Contact SJGHC Ethics Office:– (08) 9382 6940 – Level 3, St John of God House– [email protected] or [email protected]
Any Questions?