the real cost of not testing v3.ppt - nordic test · pdf filethe real cost of not testing! ......
TRANSCRIPT
23/11/2010111 Nordic Test Forum
The Real Cost of Not Testing!The Real Cost of Not Testing!
Michael J [email protected]
23/11/2010222 Nordic Test Forum
AgendaAgenda
• Market Trends• Manufacturing Test and Inspection Strategies• Cost of Test Models
– Where are the costs in Test and Inspection?– Examples
• Medium Volumes, High Complexity, Medium cost region• High Volumes, Medium Complexity, Low cost region
• Conclusion
23/11/2010333 Nordic Test Forum
Market Pressures- Product ComplexityMarket Pressures- Product Complexity
• Test and Inspection Challenges– Loss of ICT physical access
and visible access– New packaging technologies:
BGA, CCGA, FCA – Requirement for ultra lower
voltage test– ISP and Flash Programming
• Phase Change Memory – Reduced diagnostic resolution
at Functional and System Test– Increased manufacturing
process complexity, greater challenges for first pass yield
• E.g. Lead Free
30 mm
20 mm
15 mm
10 mm(.4 in.)
QFP
BGATAB
COB
CSPFC
23/11/2010444 Nordic Test Forum
Market Pressures- Design Anywhere Build AnywhereMarket Pressures- Design Anywhere Build Anywhere
• Test and Inspection Challenges– Designed in US/Europe without a
designated manufacturer– Manufacturer in Mexico, China,
Ukraine……..– Changing business models
OEM,EMS and ODM– Shortage of skilled development
and debug labor for test development
– Need for shorter test development time and fixture lead times
– Shortage of skilled development and debug labor for test development
– Changing customers quality expectations?
Start NPI
Volume
Time to Profit
Time
23/11/2010555 Nordic Test Forum
Manufacturing Test and Inspection StrategyManufacturing Test and Inspection Strategy
23/11/2010666 Nordic Test Forum
Manufacturing Test and Inspection StrategyManufacturing Test and Inspection Strategy
23/11/2010777 Nordic Test Forum
Manufacturing Test and Inspection StrategyManufacturing Test and Inspection Strategy
23/11/2010888 Nordic Test Forum
Cost of Test ModelsCost of Test Models
• Times 10 Rule– After each stage in the process it
costs10 times the amount to detect and repair a defect.
• Economics of Automatic Testing– Definitive book on the economics of
testing– Looks at cost of test, defect
distribution and even cost of money
• Others?
23/11/2010999 Nordic Test Forum
Where are the costs in Test and Inspection?Where are the costs in Test and Inspection?
• Fixed Cost/Known Costs– Capital outlay
• Test and Inspection Systems amortized over 3-10 years – AOI– AXI– ICT– Functional
– Support Costs• These tend to be 4-10% of capital outlay
– can be dwarfed by downtime!• MTBF and MTTR can be more important
23/11/2010101010 Nordic Test Forum
Where are the costs in Test and Inspection?Where are the costs in Test and Inspection?
• Fixed Cost/Known Costs - Continue– Overheads
• Floor space– Can be at a premium
• Power/services• Operators
– Tends to be fixed cost to cover shift– Some systems need more operators?– Only becomes variable if cycle time exceeds beat rate
» Including repair loop• Handler
– Removes operators and does improve quality.
23/11/2010111111 Nordic Test Forum
Where are the costs in Test and Inspection?Where are the costs in Test and Inspection?
• Controllable/Variable Costs– Dependent on board mix
• Programming and Fixturing Costs • Beat Rate• DPMO
– Quality– Repair– Scrap
23/11/2010121212 Nordic Test Forum
Cost of Test Models- based on DPMO
Cost of Test Models- based on DPMO
• DPMO – Defects Per Million Opportunities: – The number of defects in every million opportunities. By
taking into account opportunities for defects, and not just defects, we can compare processes of differing complexity.
– Many organizations have documented expected DPMO’s (iNEMI) and can be used to develop/measure best in class manufacturing environments.
– DPMO can be measure at many different levels in a manufacturing environment - Process Capability.
23/11/2010131313 Nordic Test Forum
DPMO Model Requires - Production and process information:DPMO Model Requires - Production and process information:
• Board Assumptions– Number of Solder Joints– Number of Components– Annual Production Volume– Value of Board If/When Scrapped– Beat Rate Vs. Cycle Time
• Repair Assumptions– Repair Yield– Number of Repair Cycles Permitted
23/11/2010141414 Nordic Test Forum
• Defect Rate Assumptions (Process Capability) - can be overall or sum of the individual parts
– Electrical DPMO– Structural DPMO
• Debug/Diagnosis and Repair Costs– Hourly Labor Cost of Verification/Diagnosis– Hourly Labor Cost of Repair– Time to Verification /Diagnose One Defect– Time to Repair One Defect
• Re-Test Cost• Cost of Field Failures/Returns
Production and process information:Production and process information:
23/11/2010151515 Nordic Test Forum
ICT and Functional Model for Manufacturing TestICT and Functional Model for Manufacturing Test
In-circuit Functional SystemTest
DPMO in
Repair loop effectivenessDebug and
Repair costs
Test System CapabilityDefect Coverage
DPMO out
Scrap rate and costs
DPMO – Defects Per Million Opportunities
23/11/2010161616 Nordic Test Forum
AOI and AXI have a Different ModelAOI and AXI have a Different Model
AXI/AOI
Scrap Rate and Costs(What gets repaired?)
Test System CapabilityDefect Coverage
Debug and Repair
Analysis
DPMO in
DPMO out
TestInspection
Defects and False fails
23/11/2010171717 Nordic Test Forum
Field Returns are the hidden cost of low defect detectionField Returns are the hidden cost of low defect detection
• Real Vs. Calculated field failures• Not all defects cause faults
– Redundant Power Connections. Decoupling capacitors, Unused parts etc. but these can effect reliability and therefore in a simple world DPMO that escape have a probability of causing a field failure.
– Electrical tests such as Incircuit, functional and system use the board in the same way as it is intended and therefore reduce that risk
– but it can be assumed that 50% of escaped DPMO’s cause field failures
23/11/2010191919 Nordic Test Forum
Medium Complexity, Low Volumes – Medium Cost AreaMedium Complexity, Low Volumes – Medium Cost Area
23/11/2010202020 Nordic Test Forum
Medium Complexity, Low Volumes – Medium Cost AreaMedium Complexity, Low Volumes – Medium Cost Area
23/11/2010212121 Nordic Test Forum
Medium Complexity, Low Volumes – Medium Cost Area - No AOIMedium Complexity, Low Volumes – Medium Cost Area - No AOI
23/11/2010222222 Nordic Test Forum
Medium Complexity, Low Volumes –Medium Cost Area - No ICTMedium Complexity, Low Volumes –Medium Cost Area - No ICT
23/11/2010232323 Nordic Test Forum
Medium Complexity, Low Volumes –Medium Cost Area - No AOI and ICTMedium Complexity, Low Volumes –Medium Cost Area - No AOI and ICT
23/11/2010242424 Nordic Test Forum
Medium Complexity, Low Volumes –Medium Cost Area - No AOI and ICTMedium Complexity, Low Volumes –Medium Cost Area - No AOI and ICT
23/11/2010252525 Nordic Test Forum
High Volume Motherboard –Low Cost AreaHigh Volume Motherboard –Low Cost Area
23/11/2010262626 Nordic Test Forum
High Volume Motherboard –Low Cost AreaHigh Volume Motherboard –Low Cost Area
23/11/2010272727 Nordic Test Forum
High Volume Motherboard –Low Cost Area – No AOIHigh Volume Motherboard –Low Cost Area – No AOI
23/11/2010282828 Nordic Test Forum
High Volume Motherboard –Low Cost Area – No ICTHigh Volume Motherboard –Low Cost Area – No ICT
23/11/2010292929 Nordic Test Forum
High Volume Motherboard– Low Cost Area – 80% ICT coverageHigh Volume Motherboard– Low Cost Area – 80% ICT coverage
23/11/2010303030 Nordic Test Forum
Coverage Vs. CostsCoverage Vs. Costs
• Even a small decrease in defect coverage can have a major impact on cost.
• AOI and ICT No AOI No ICT
• Removing a test stage will– Increase overall operational costs!– Increase field return costs.
23/11/2010313131 Nordic Test Forum
ConclusionConclusion
• DPMO (Defects Per Million Opportunities ) is a valid way to measure Process Capability.
• DPMO can measure the effectiveness of a manufacturing process
• DPMO can help measure the cost of defects in the process and determine the most cost effective inspection solution.
• DPMO can indicate THE REAL COST OF NOT TESTING!