the proximity effect · duties of the day, the proximity effect inhibits us. when attending a...

2
MATERIAL MATTERS During a break in the proceedings of a meeting at the National Academy of Scien- ces last month, I found myself, coffee cup in hand, standing outside the Constitution Avenue entrance gazing at the pensive bronze image of Albert Einstein as it was pondered by a few tourists. While wonder- ing where those visitors placed so great a scientific mind in their own personal scheme of things and feeling somewhat inspired myself, I was joined by David Nagel of the Naval Research Laboratory. We got to talking about the tourism phenomenon per se and wondered whether many Washing- ton, DC area residents had stopped to examine the Einstein likeness. We agreed (without knowledge of any properly con- ducted survey) that people tend to visit all the interesting sites while traveling but are much less likely to include such a visit on their daily schedule in their local area. One can hypothesize why. The local always appears less exotic than the distant (a variant on "the grass is greener" syndrome). Or, perhaps one always imagines that there will be many other more convenient times than now to make the explicit effort to visit something so readily at hand. No matter. As I began to perceive that an analogous behavior applies to conference attendees, Dr. Nagel advised me that the phenomenon over which we were musing was called the "proximity effect." Proximity, indeed. The phenomenon that I was trying to enunciate was just that. I have often found myself in intense technical discussions with colleagues from my own institution while attending a conference. Sometimes with coworkers whose labs or offices were only a few steps from mine. Why did it seem more natural to have these The Proximity Effect Elton N. Kaufmann, MRS President "We all try to keep abreast of activities at our . . . institutions . . . but the proximity effect inhibits us." discussions while away from home. In this way, I frequently learned of interesting and potentially useful goings-on that I later followed up on my return. It would seem a rather round about way to maximize one's coupling to one's own institution. Another side of this phenomenon is the chagrin one experiences when a colleague from a distant institution tells you of work carried out by your coworkers of which you were unaware. Before carrying this to an extreme, how- ever, let's acknowledge that we all try to keep abreast of activities at home and that our institutions often provide a variety of tools, such as seminars and internal publica- tions, to help us. But it seems that because they are so readily available, and because we are all so busy with many pressing duties of the day, the proximity effect inhibits us. When attending a conference, our focus is narrower, extraneous interruptions are fewer, and the atmosphere seems more conducive to these types of exchanges. Bumping into a coworker while conferen- cing is just an accidental use of the se- questered-retreat method frequently em- ployed by committees and task forces. What should one do about the proximity effect? I see two alternatives. If you are a resident of the Washington, DC area, visit the local sites as if your were from Spokane and don't forget the likeness of Einstein. And, if you realize that proximity is af- fecting your interaction with your cowork- ers, make a concerted effort to walk through the halls of your laboratory asking people about the exciting things with which they're involved. On the other hand, since the proximity effect is a staple of human nature we could turn it to our advantage. To appreciate local attractions, research your area and play tour guide for relatives from out of town. And as materials research scientists, put conferences on your calen- dars where you are likely to have the most fruitful interactions. May we suggest that the Fall Meeting of the MRS in Boston this year is an eminent candidate for taking full advantage of the ubiquitous proximity effect. Plan Now To Take Advantage of JOB PLACEMENT CENTER In Conjunction with 1985 MRS Fall Meeting The Job Placement Center, to be held in conjunction with the 1985 MRS Fall Meeting in Boston (December 2-6), is a valuable way to become acquainted with important contacts in materials research and make your credentials known to them. See the Job Placement Form in this issue. Fee: $ 5.00* (Make checks payable to American Institute of Physics). A confidential service of the American Institute of Physics on behalf of the Materials Research Society. *Fee for employers is $60.00. Contact Beverly Citrynell, AIP, (212) 661-9404 PAGE 4, MRS BULLETIN, SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 1985 https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1557/S0883769400040185 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 54.39.106.173, on 01 Sep 2021 at 07:54:07, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at

Upload: others

Post on 21-Jul-2021

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Proximity Effect · duties of the day, the proximity effect inhibits us. When attending a conference, our focus is narrower, extraneous interruptions are fewer, and the atmosphere

MATERIAL MATTERS

During a break in the proceedings of ameeting at the National Academy of Scien-ces last month, I found myself, coffee cup inhand, standing outside the ConstitutionAvenue entrance gazing at the pensivebronze image of Albert Einstein as it waspondered by a few tourists. While wonder-ing where those visitors placed so great ascientific mind in their own personal schemeof things and feeling somewhat inspiredmyself, I was joined by David Nagel of theNaval Research Laboratory. We got totalking about the tourism phenomenon perse and wondered whether many Washing-ton, DC area residents had stopped toexamine the Einstein likeness. We agreed(without knowledge of any properly con-ducted survey) that people tend to visit allthe interesting sites while traveling but aremuch less likely to include such a visit ontheir daily schedule in their local area.

One can hypothesize why. The local alwaysappears less exotic than the distant (avariant on "the grass is greener" syndrome).Or, perhaps one always imagines that therewill be many other more convenient timesthan now to make the explicit effort to visitsomething so readily at hand. No matter.As I began to perceive that an analogousbehavior applies to conference attendees,Dr. Nagel advised me that the phenomenonover which we were musing was called the"proximity effect."

Proximity, indeed. The phenomenon that Iwas trying to enunciate was just that. Ihave often found myself in intense technicaldiscussions with colleagues from my owninstitution while attending a conference.Sometimes with coworkers whose labs oroffices were only a few steps from mine.Why did it seem more natural to have these

The Proximity EffectElton N. Kaufmann, MRS President

"We all try to keep abreast of activitiesat our . . . institutions . . . but theproximity effect inhibits us."

discussions while away from home. In thisway, I frequently learned of interesting andpotentially useful goings-on that I laterfollowed up on my return. It would seem arather round about way to maximize one'scoupling to one's own institution.

Another side of this phenomenon is thechagrin one experiences when a colleaguefrom a distant institution tells you of workcarried out by your coworkers of whichyou were unaware.

Before carrying this to an extreme, how-ever, let's acknowledge that we all try tokeep abreast of activities at home and thatour institutions often provide a variety oftools, such as seminars and internal publica-tions, to help us. But it seems that becausethey are so readily available, and becausewe are all so busy with many pressingduties of the day, the proximity effectinhibits us.When attending a conference, our focus isnarrower, extraneous interruptions arefewer, and the atmosphere seems moreconducive to these types of exchanges.Bumping into a coworker while conferen-

cing is just an accidental use of the se-questered-retreat method frequently em-ployed by committees and task forces.

What should one do about the proximityeffect? I see two alternatives. If you are aresident of the Washington, DC area, visitthe local sites as if your were from Spokaneand don't forget the likeness of Einstein.And, if you realize that proximity is af-fecting your interaction with your cowork-ers, make a concerted effort to walk throughthe halls of your laboratory asking peopleabout the exciting things with which they'reinvolved. On the other hand, since theproximity effect is a staple of human naturewe could turn it to our advantage. Toappreciate local attractions, research yourarea and play tour guide for relatives fromout of town. And as materials researchscientists, put conferences on your calen-dars where you are likely to have the mostfruitful interactions. May we suggest thatthe Fall Meeting of the MRS in Boston thisyear is an eminent candidate for taking fulladvantage of the ubiquitous proximityeffect.

Plan Now To Take Advantage of

JOB PLACEMENT CENTERIn Conjunction with 1985 MRS Fall Meeting

The Job Placement Center, to be held in conjunction with the 1985 MRS Fall Meeting inBoston (December 2-6), is a valuable way to become acquainted with important contactsin materials research and make your credentials known to them. See the Job PlacementForm in this issue. Fee: $ 5.00* (Make checks payable to American Institute of Physics).

A confidential service of the American Institute of Physicson behalf of the Materials Research Society.

*Fee for employers is $60.00. Contact Beverly Citrynell, AIP, (212) 661-9404

PAGE 4, MRS BULLETIN, SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 1985

https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1557/S0883769400040185Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 54.39.106.173, on 01 Sep 2021 at 07:54:07, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at

Page 2: The Proximity Effect · duties of the day, the proximity effect inhibits us. When attending a conference, our focus is narrower, extraneous interruptions are fewer, and the atmosphere

s aovd 'S86i ii3aoi3o/ii3aiAi3ici3s 'Nixmma

ONIHOSZ13N aavo0»E6-e99-0LS =XM1 • 01.08-696 (SU) H31

£6ei.-i»e6i. vd 'uoixgXBM BUHMPM 6U

uo|8|A|a s|«X|eu\r lauiMiuaaiVUOdUOONI HOSZ±3N

JO ||BO asB3|d '8|uaiunjisu||BWUai|l l|08Z)8N J8l|)O AUB JO 60fr VIS

aM» UO UO|1BUUO|U| MOW JOJ

UBMU08 S!SA|BUB IBUM8M10 oOOll* oj ajagdsouiiB uiBais

ajaqd«oui|B SBB eAjsojJooajat|d8oui|B seB paui

»-0i. x s 01 Aimqedeo uinnoeAO0OOZI.+ O) o o09l-- :aBuBj

gjnopBW V±Q PUB ©I |IB|« tSBJd fr(spuooaa 09 ««|i nri)

jossaoojdojoiui aoBiuni unuBoid Z(s|OJ|uoo aiduqi z)

'Ojaz oj aouB|Bq uiaisAs jas 'Zu| aoBkj *a|duiBt i|B|a/A 'I.

60t VIS

https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1557/S0883769400040185Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 54.39.106.173, on 01 Sep 2021 at 07:54:07, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at