NEWSLETTER FOR THE DANISH SOLDIERS CLUB OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC. POST OFFICE BOX 41, PETALUMA CA. 94953 MEMBER OF DANSKE SOLDATERFORENINGERS LANDSRÅD PROTECTOR HER MAJESTY QUEEN MARGRETHE II OF DENMARK

THE PRESIDENTS LETTER Greetings- April was a great spring event, and we had a near perfect day. According to Vagn we will have upgraded sanitary facilities short-ly. Fortunately nobody requested that we install the latest gadgets prevalent in Japan. A very nice lady visiting from Denmark agreed - only with limited (no is not an answer) jawboning - to join our great lady ensemble in their rendition of the national anthems. Another great lady (with the cutest baby on her arm) reported that Keith is do-ing well in the hospital, and she was brash enough to promise to cover his duties on the board until his full recovery! Nice going ladies - what would we do without you! According to Per our next Barbeque is well staffed with qualified volun-teers and back-up. We even have an apprentice - Peter the blog-ger. Per promised to watch him like a hawk until Peter has proven his mettle in the fine art of cooking for the soldiers. See you in May. Poul

Post Office Box 41 Petaluma, CA 94953

Address Correction Requested

www.danishsoldiersclub.com April 2015

-You need exercise - Yes—but preferable in tablets

Actually, I have a sense of humor, but I’ve just never needed it in my Job

-There was a great amusement at the office today. -I happened to make a joke without realizing it.

Lilian Rasmussen Membership Coordinator

Roseville (916) 771-4961 mormor@surewest.net 4397 Coach Whip Way Roseville, CA 95747-8623

Volunteer

You can order a Smørrebrød luncheon for the 1st. Saturday of every month, when we meet at Kas-tania Fælled. However in MAY and SEPTEMBER we will enjoy our New York Steak BBQ. Our Christ-mas Party is on the 3rd. Sunday in December 2015. There is no January event.

The April 4 luncheon drew almost 70 members and guests. The weather was perfect and everybody enjoyed the Kastania Fælled. Unfortunately we had two members passing before last meeting. Keld Helmuth past President of the club, and member Knud Lauerlund. Rest in peace. On the bright side we had visitors from Denmark. They were Theis Nygaard’s parents and sister. Theis has been an exchange student, living with Rick & Lise Santarini, for the past 8 months. Below you see the whole family Lene, Per Theis and Ida. Thanks for coming to the Danish Soldiers Club April luncheon.

Next month is BBQ time. Per Madsen and his volunteers are gear-ing up for an unforgettable event. Please do not miss it. Keith Brians will be back for the BBQ after his surgery.

By now we have completed the task of getting all outstanding membership fees paid, so the club can concentrate on more crea-tive projects.

The Governing Board for 2015

Poul Poulsen President to 2015

San Rafael (415) 459-7727 poulsenpo@danishsoldiersclub.com

Per Madsen Vice Pres. to 2015

San Francisco (415) 928-4509 permads@danishsoldiersclub.com

Vagn Nielsen Treasurer to 2017

Sonoma (707) 996-9950 vknielsen@danishsoldiersclub.com

Rick Santarini Secretary to 2016

Santa Rosa (707) 479-6575 ricksantarini@sbcglobal.net

John Johansen Newsletter/Web Director to 2016

Modesto (209) 545-8992 admin@danishsoldiersclub.com

Ken Fultz Director to 2017

American Canyon (415) 362-7509 KFCVA41@comcast.net

Leo Pedersen Director to 2015

Danville (925) 820-2150 Leo.pedersen@gmail.com

Keith Brians Director to 2017

Petaluma (707) 789-9953 kastaniakeith@gmail.com

Peter B. Steiness Director to 2016

Santa Rosa (707) 486-5329 steiness@sbcglobal.net

Thanks to all the raffle donors. Your Board of Di-rectors are truly appreciative of your gift, which benefits our club. Ken Fultz, Poul Poulsen, Tove, Kirsten Pedersen, Joe Santarini, Dana Eddie Muess, Signe Vik, Rick & Lise Santarini, Peter Steiness. I hope all donors wrote their name on the list.

I DO – but do I really? By Peter Steiness

We do ‘I do’ a lot, especially when getting married. It’s the solemn promise we make, agreeing to live by defined rules within Holy Matrimony (not to be confused with the more popular Holy Macaroni – which in many cases might be a wiser choice). Not only are we blurting out this serious acceptance in front of the person we hope we will be able to stand ‘till death do us part’; it’s also in front of a clergy (aka: the main witness) and a flock of guests pre-tending to be interested, while more so thinking of the reception’s free chicken and freer flowing booze. That Uncle Ernie is accepting cash in the back-row pew, giving bad odds bets concerning the length of your marriage, just adds a bit of reality.

We say ‘I do’ like we know what we are doing, but I am sure that for the most part we don’t know half of it. The thing is that it’s a promise concerning fu-ture behavior within accepted rules that comes with any marriage or partnership; so I have a hard time understanding why we still blurt out ‘I do’ so freely. As a reality check before any I do’s shouldn’t we at least mumble this reminder: “it’s easy to predict, except about the future”? Made you think, huh?

I know the romance involved (aka: euphoric confu-sion) concerning this public announcement we make in front of anybody who cares, that from now on it’s you and me, babe. I invented the term being in love dims the light of common sense as a fair warning (but did you listen?) and though I might sound a tad cynical, I am all for the matrimonial thing – for anybody who wants to; but that is of course not the whole point.

The marriage vow is yet another promise we make to each other during a wedding ceremony and in front of those same hungry and thirsty witnesses. The ‘I do’ is the confirmation of these vows and thereby fully agreeing with the rules of matrimony. But isn’t it a lot like clicking “agree” to Apple’s new 15 screen-pages of added user-terms without read-ing a single word?

In the early Roman Empire, the lower classes had ‘free’ marriages. Dad would pretty much deliver the daughter to the groom - deal done. Kind of a shot-gun wedding before the shot-gun was invented.

Maybe they used those long spiky things instead. The two ‘chosen’ agreed to keep the vows of mar-riage by mutual consent; piece of Roman cup-cake…

Wealthy Romans would sign documents listing prop-erty rights to publicly declare that their union was legalized and not just by common law; this started the official recording of marriages and the invention of pre-nuptials. Thanks a lot, Caesar.

When you look at the wedding vows from way back, you go ‘WOW’ – seriously. The Medieval Church of England had the ‘Book of common Prayers’, from around 1549 (I was barely 6) where you were ‘offered’ a couple of choices. Remember back in the days, the church pretty told you what to do and when, so in this case it was only either, as in ‘no other options’ – at all.

The ‘lucky’ couple could ‘promise’ each other to ‘love and cherish’. A lovely promise as both ‘love’ and ‘cherish’ are good things in any relationship; so far, so good. Then the groom was ‘offered’ an addi-tion, and could ‘vow’ his bride with ‘to love, cherish and worship’. Now, we would have a real bang-up job to find any bride woman person who would not like to be ‘worshipped’; up on the pedestal she goes. I have heard that the male Vikings so totally worshipped the females in their society (still do), and that was just how it was – very naturally (and very smart).

The bride was ‘offered’ the vow addition: ‘to love, cherish and obey’ (Yuk). If I’m not totally wrong, a few of Henry VIII’s wives did not fully understand the meaning of obey (or how to run away really fast…) Remember that the ‘obey’ thing is still pop-ping up in front of unsuspecting brides even today – so watch out (or learn to run really fast…)

The Roman Catholics pledge to each other: I (Joe Soprano) take you (Angelina Struttelmeyer (not her real name)) to be my wife. I promise to be true to you in good times and in bad, in sickness and in health. I will love you and honor you all the days of my life; sounded like Joe was in a hurry?

Other pledges go: I (Joe Soprano) take you (Angelina Struttelmeyer (still not her real name)) to be my lawfully wedded wife, to have and to hold, from this day forward, for better, for worse, for richer, for poorer, in sickness and in health, until death do us part; still a daring promise, but a tad

more romantic; way to go, Joe. Then the clergy-person might say the following to round it all up: You have declared your consent be-fore the church (and Uncle Ernie in the back row). May the Lord in his goodness strengthen your con-sent and fill you both with his blessings. What God has joined, men must not divide – Amen. (But can women divide it, huh?) As a side-note, have you no-ticed how some ceremonies end with: I hereby (something invested in me) declare you MAN and wife…? I have always found that to be utterly male-chauvinistic. It should always be: husband and wife, but more so from my book of ethics: wife and hus-band…it’s a chivalry thing; so old-school I am (sigh). Now, looking at the above, you are promising a grand deal and telling all of us that you will not ne-gate on any of these (silly) promises. The thing is that when we digest what we are promising, it is a lot, since we have absolutely no idea how, who, where and what we will be in a week, a month or in years - that future thing, remember? We don’t know how we will develop as a person, character-wise, emotionally or what new values will pop up or down. But we still tell the world that we will be good and do all that heavy lifting – till death do us part; quite a task, really, and more than a mouthful. I can tear all those vows apart and be a smart-ass, but I also acknowledge that when vows are ex-changed, the seriousness, romance and love are all honest (if not, they should be) and thoughts of a happy life forever and together should be the fruit of that. Perhaps it won’t happen by the book, but I’m positive that we all give it a go from the very moment we blurt out: ‘I do’. My cynical side (which is also pretty, by the way), asks me to come up with a solution. When being totally realistic, I suggest that instead of ‘I do’ we should go with the much more applicable: ‘I’ll do my very best’. Covers a lot more ground… and can-not get you into any hot pudding, as it gives you a fair way out if needed. And then, of course, we have to deal with the doubts when we are in the process of committing to a relationship, partnership or marriage – that is ra-ther natural. We answer: ‘Yes, I have never been surer about anybody – no doubts at all’. But reality is that we still have some lingering doubts, one of them being: ‘do I do the right thing for me?’ I

mean, how can we be sure about anything or any-body when we consider how unsure the future can seem? We seriously don’t know what’s going to happen. Sure we know what we want to happen, who we (at this moment) want to be with as the things we want to happen actually happen. But we can only guess about the future concerning luck, love and relationships – as nothing is guaranteed. I’m a huge fan of creating my own luck – make things happen as I want them to happen. Of course, at times it doesn’t go as planned – which can also be exciting, as it exposes new challenges (failures?) But I never rely on my luck, as that would be very silly. When we do the ‘I do’ we do it with good inten-tions; we want it to work out with Miss or Mr. Right. So we labor for happiness, thrive to build founda-tions for each other, we look for those positive things that make us unique, make us stronger, to-gether and individually. We will find disappoint-ments and sides of each other we did not see be-fore. But then we try to deal with it by seeking solu-tions and new agreements, stuff that our relation-ship will learn, flourish and move forward from. Yes, relationships take work, a lot of constant work to be balanced, productive and happy, but the fruits of that hard work are for the most part priceless – if not, they should be... or you shouldn’t be together. ‘I’ll do my very best’ is a more realistic confirmation concerning any partnership, more so then ‘I do’, as ‘I do’ leaves no wriggle-room. In my book, any mar-riage and partnership, including the doubts and all, needs room to wriggle – and the more we can wrig-gle, the better; Amen.