the pollution adjudication board (pab)

28
5/27/2018 ThePollutionAdjudicationBoard(PAB)-slidepdf.com http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-pollution-adjudication-board-pab 1/28 THE POLLUTION ADJUDICATION BOARD (PAB)

Upload: faina-ifurung

Post on 17-Oct-2015

24 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Lecture

TRANSCRIPT

  • THE POLLUTION

    ADJUDICATION

    BOARD (PAB)

  • LANDMARK CASES DECIDED BY THE

    SUPREME COURT

    OPOSA VS. FACTORAN, JR. (224 SCRA 792) 1993

    FACTS: 44 children on behalf of their generation and

    future generations, filed a petition with the Court

    requesting that DENR cancel timber license

    agreements, and order the agency to cease and

    desist from granting more timber license agreements

    ISSUE: Whether the children had legal standing

    (locus standi) to bring the case

    RULING: The children had standing based on the

    concept of Intergenerational Responsibility

  • LANDMARK CASES DECIDED BY THE

    SUPREME COURT

    MMDA VS. CONCERNED RESIDENTS OF MANILA BAY

    FACTS: On January 29, 1999, respondents Concerned Residents of Manila Bay filed a complaint before the Regional Trial Court (RTC) in Imus, Cavite against several government agencies, among them the petitioners, for the cleanup, rehabilitation, and protection of the Manila Bay. The complaint alleged that the water quality of the Manila Bay had fallen way below the allowable standards set by law

    ISSUE: Can Petitioners be compelled by Mandamus to clean up and rehabilitate Manila Bay?

  • MMDA VS. CONCERNED RESIDENTS OF

    MANILA BAY

    RULING: The Government agencies through a

    Continuing Mandamus are compelled to clean up

    Manila Bay

  • WHO MAY BE PARTIES

    any person, party, or entity who has interest in

    the subject of the action

    DENR(Regional Office, PENRO)

    COMPLAINANT-party initiating the action

    RESPONDENT-party against whom the complaint

    is filed

  • WHEN ACTION IS DEEMED COMMENCED

    Upon filing of the complaint with the

    Board, Regional Office, PENRO or

    CENRO or

    By the issuance of a Notice of

    Violation by the Regional Office

  • DISCOVERY OF VIOLATION FROM COMPLAINTS

    AND MONITORING SOURCES

    DENR- EMB office

    concerned shall verify the

    complaint or report if it is

    within the purview of P.D

    1586

    EMB Director refers the

    Complaint to Pollution

    Adjudication Board (PAB) or

    government entities/LGUs

    Within 72 hours DENR-EMB

    send Proponents Notice of

    Alleged Violation

    -request for Official Reply

    -field validation, inspection

    and verification(to validate the

    complaint)

    NO YES

  • COMPLAINT UNDER P.D 1586

    Issuance of

    NAV/NOV

    Proponent responds in

    7 days

    Case Handler calls Technical

    Conference( clarify the

    issue/request for addtl info)

    Case deemed submitted for

    Decision whether to issue:

    1. Clearance letter

    2. Order of Payment

    Discovery of violation

    either from:

    -Field Monitoring

    -Field Inspection

    -Field Survey

    -Desk Review

  • THE POLLUTION ADJUDICATION

    BOARD (PAB)

    Created under Executive Order 192 (Section 19)

    or the Reorganization Act of the Department of

    Environment and Natural Resources

    Quasi-judicial Body

    Adjudication of Pollution Cases

    The PAB is organizationally under the supervision

    of the Office of the Secretary of the Department

    of Environment and Natural Resources (the

    DENR)

    The Environmental Management Bureau (EMB)

    provides the Secretariat support.

  • POLLUTION ADJUDICATION BOARD

    Organizational Placement co-equal w/

    RTC

    Sec.7 (d) of PD 984 - Execution of

    decision Any decision or order of the Commission,

    after the same has become final and

    executory, shall be enforced and executed in

    the same manner as decisions of Courts of

    First Instance,

  • COMPOSITION OF PAB

    Composed of the following:

    Chairman: DENR Secretary

    Members:

    2 DENR Undersecretaries

    EMB Director

    3 others to be designated by the

    Secretary

  • PRESENT COMPOSITION OF PAB Chairman: Sec. Ramon J.P. Paje

    Presiding Officer: USEC. Demetrio L.

    Ignacio, Jr.

    Members:

    USEC. Manuel D. Gerochi

    Atty. Juan Miguel T. Cuna

    For. Renato A. De Rueda

    Dr. Anthony S.F. Chiu

    Engr. Jeffrey G. Mijares

  • NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE PAB

    Summary in nature

    Technical rules on evidence in courts of law shall

    NOT bind the Board and Regional Offices

    GENERAL RULE: The Rules of Court shall NOT

    apply in proceedings before the Board

    EXCEPTION: By analogy OR in a suppletory

    character AND only whenever applicable

    ADMINISTRATIVE DUE PROCESS

    -SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

  • GENERAL JURISDICTION OF THE BOARD

    EXCLUSIVE jurisdiction over adjudication of POLLUTION cases AND all other matters related thereto, including imposition of administrative sanctions

    POLLUTION

    ANY ALTERATION of physical, chemical or biological properties of any water, air, and/or land resources of the Philippines OR

    ANY DISCHARGE OR EMISSION thereto of any liquid, gaseous or solid wastes as will be likely to create or

  • render such water, air and land resources harmful,

    detrimental or injurious, to public health, safety or

    welfare or which will adversely affect their utilization

    for domestic, commercial, industrial, agricultural,

    recreational or other legitimate purposes

    EXCEPTION TO EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION:

    When the law provides for a specific forum, that is,

    LLDA Law states that it has jurisdiction over pollution

    cases affecting the Laguna Lake Region

  • Jurisdiction of the PAB:

    Philippine Clean Air Act of 1999 (R.A. 8749)

    Exceeding air emission standards

    Operating without permit to operate air pollution

    source installations

    Philippine Clean Water Act of 2004 (R.A. 9275)

    Exceeding DENR Effluent standards (DAO 35)

    Committing any of the prohibited acts under

    Section 27 of RA 9275

  • PROHIBITED ACTS UNDER SECTION 27

    OF RA 9275

    Discharging or depositing materials that could

    pollute any water body

    Discharging regulated pollutants without valid

    discharge permit

    Undertaking activities in violation of P.D. 1586

    Transport or discharge of prohibited chemicals

    under R.A. 6969

    Transport or dumping of solid wastes under

    R.A. 9003

  • PROHIBITED ACTS UNDER SECTION 27

    OF RA 9275

    Transport or dumping of solid wastes into sea

    waters

    Refusal to allow entry, inspection, and monitoring

    by the DENR

    Refusal to allow access to relevant reports

    Refusal or Failure to submit reports whenever

    required by DENR

    Refusal or Failure to designate Pollution Control

    Officers

  • POWERS OF PAB AND SANCTIONS UNDER

    RA 9275

    Recommend to the Secretary, the issuance of Cease

    and Desist Orders

    Recommend to the Secretary, the imposition of fine

    for a minimum of PhP10,000 to a maximum of

    PhP200,000.00 per day of violation

    Recommend that the proper government agencies

    file criminal charges against violators

  • POWERS OF PAB AND SANCTIONS

    UNDER RA 8749

    Issuance of Cease and Desist Orders

    Imposition of fine for a minimum of PhP10,000

    to a maximum of PhP100,000.00 per day of

    violation

    Recommend to proper government agencies file

    criminal charges against violators

  • PAB POWER TO ISSUE CEASE AND DESIST ORDER

    (CDO)

    WHEN THE BOARD FINDS PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE

    THAT THE EMISSION OR DISCHARGE OF

    POLLUTANTS CONSTITUTE AN IMMEDIATE

    THREAT TO LIFE, PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY OR

    WELFARE, OR TO ANIMAL OR PLANT LIFE, OR

    EXCEEDS THE ALLOWABLE DENR STANDARDS, IT

    MAY ISSUE OR RECOMMEND TO THE DENR

    SECRETARY AN EX-PARTE ORDER (WITHOUT

    NEED OF A PRIOR PUBLIC HEARING)

  • IMMEDIATELY EXECUTORY AND REMAIN IN

    FORCE AND EFFECT UNTIL MODIFIED OR

    LIFTED BY THE BOARD OR DENR SECRETARY

    -the Regional Director, OR his duly authorized

    representative, in coordination with the Regional

    Executive Director, implement the CDO not later

    than seventy two (72) hours from receipt thereof

    INTERIM CDO

    -issued by the Regional Director

    -effective for seven (7) days

  • SHOW CAUSE ORDER

    -the Board may opt to direct Respondent to show

    cause why no CDO be issued against it, subject to

    the following:

    1. The results of a series of effluent samplings show a

    marked decrease in the values of the relevant

    parameters.

    2. The values of the relevant parameters are not far

    from the DENR Standards

  • TEMPORARY LIFTING ORDER (TLO)

    Suspends the effectivity of the CDO and allows respondent to temporarily resume operations

    during the pendency of proceedings before the

    Board. This will allow respondent to construct/

    upgrade its pollution control device

    Effective only within the prescribed period given by the board

    Upon proper motion of the Respondent

  • ISSUANCE OF TLO

    For implementation of effective Pollution

    Control Programs

    For sampling purposes

  • FORMAL LIFTING OF CEASE AND DESIST

    ORDER

    Termination of the case after full

    compliance with the DENR Standards

    and full payment of fines without

    prejudice to future actions that may be

    commenced against the Respondent

    as warranted by law or new

    circumstances

  • POLLUTION ADJUDICATION PROCESS

    Compliant

    Resolution

    Non Compliant

    Endorse to PAB

    Regional Office For inspection/reports

    Resolution/Order

    Fines/Penalties

    Regl Office

    Execute

    Order

    1 Regional Offices should submit copies of all NOVs to the PAB

    - Monitoring

    - Complaint

    -Inspection

    Report

    NOV1

    Technical

    Conference

    Compliance

    Period

    Order

    Fines/ Penalties

    PAB

    Resolution Issued: CDO, TLO, Fines, FLO/Dismissed

  • THANK YOU