the point grey - cornwall controversy: who is this road for?

13
The Point Grey - Cornwall Corridor A Dialogue Resulting in a Safe Solution Duane Nickull - West 6th Avenue Enterprise Software Architect Cycling commuter George Seslija - Pt. Grey Road & Trafalgar Real estate investor Recreational Cyclist

Upload: placespeak

Post on 09-May-2015

258 views

Category:

News & Politics


0 download

DESCRIPTION

When: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 12:30 PM Where: SFU Vancouver, Harbour Centre 515 West Hastings, Room 1600 Pt. Grey Road and Cornwall Ave. link the Burrard Bridge with Jericho Beach. They’re flat, scenic, and popular with pedestrians, runners, recreational and commuting cyclists, and drivers. The city proposes changes to make them safer for “all ages and abilities,” at some cost for drivers. Neighbours are split on what, if anything, to do. Framing the discussion are proponent residents Peter Ladner and Pamela McColl, and an opposing residents George Seslija and Duane Nickull. Then it’s your turn to ask, observe, opine. These slides are from the presentation by George Seslija and Duane Nickull. The video of this event is available here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JgmgjhNHgb8

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Point Grey - Cornwall controversy: Who is this road for?

The Point Grey - Cornwall CorridorA Dialogue Resulting in a Safe Solution

Duane Nickull - West 6th Avenue

•Enterprise Software Architect

•Cycling commuter

George Seslija -

Pt. Grey Road & Trafalgar

•Real estate investor

•RecreationalCyclist

Page 2: The Point Grey - Cornwall controversy: Who is this road for?

Considerations:

• A lot of people & ton of work into proposals.o Please be respectful.o No personal attacks please.

• Certain outcomes beyond ability to predict.o Keep an open mind.

• Everyone is acting in good faith.o You may not agree, but please respect their beliefs.

Page 3: The Point Grey - Cornwall controversy: Who is this road for?

Common Goals

Greenest City in the world (2020)

Safe places to cycle

City land use part of regional, holistic approach (2040 Plan):Modes: Pedestrian, Bike, Motorized (elec.) Vehicles,

etc.

All Stakeholders: Transit, commuters (cycling, motorized), businesses, land owners, recreational users, environmentalists.

We are cyclists too!

Page 4: The Point Grey - Cornwall controversy: Who is this road for?

We are for cycling safety!

Work and process to date is good yet brings up question. Some assumptions and details need attention/clarification. Some data does not align with facts uncovered.

We would like to slow down a bit to listen to concerns. Many only aware since May. Build Consensus: Ensure majority has chance to be heard. Safety: One area in particular could result in collisions

Most Importantly:

Work together to build safe consensus!

Page 5: The Point Grey - Cornwall controversy: Who is this road for?

Today’s Goals:

• Listen to any outstanding concerns about the plan;

• Work offline to address them prior to the vote next week;

• Help craft solutions.

Page 6: The Point Grey - Cornwall controversy: Who is this road for?

Out of Scope for today’s Conversation

• Reckless cyclists/motorists (existing laws cover)

• Finger pointing or blame.

• Not trying to fix the process of City Hall.

FUD: Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt

Page 7: The Point Grey - Cornwall controversy: Who is this road for?

Some of the claims we have heard?

• “ICBC records show 143 crashes on this stretch of road between 2005-2009, with two thirds resulting in an injury or fatality”.

• ICBC Reports 43 crashes between 2008-2012:

Source: http://www.icbc.com/crashmap-cyclists

No Crashes

Page 8: The Point Grey - Cornwall controversy: Who is this road for?

Public Consultation?• “Contrary to recent claims that the city is not listening to

citizens, the city notes that it has held 50 meetings with stakeholders and interested groups in the last six weeks. More recently three open houses attracted thousands of people…”

Source: City of Vancouver - http://vancouver.ca/files/cov/Point-Grey-Cornwall-Phase1-Consultation-Summary-April-2013.pdf

Timeframe

Discrepancy

Page 9: The Point Grey - Cornwall controversy: Who is this road for?

a. Discrepancies in data: Can we maybe sit down to reconcile?

b. Insufficient data available for data modeling of traffic flow (can be mitigated by temporary closure to test assumptions).

c. One block has high potential for cyclist death/injury.

d. Backed up traffic COULD cause more Green House Gasses to be emitted (will be easy to conduct tests to measure/audit before and after).

Some Concerns & Solutions

Page 10: The Point Grey - Cornwall controversy: Who is this road for?

Existing Hornby St. Separated Bike Lane

22

Seven “Right in / Right out” crossings

in 10 blocks

Seven “Right in / Right out” crossings

in 10 blocks

Page 11: The Point Grey - Cornwall controversy: Who is this road for?

TWO WAY BIKE LANE

Page 12: The Point Grey - Cornwall controversy: Who is this road for?

Proposed Bike Lane

66

Ten “All directional” crossings in 2 blocksTen “All directional”

crossings in 2 blocks

44

Page 13: The Point Grey - Cornwall controversy: Who is this road for?

Considerations?

• Do the proposals:o Minimize conflict between all road users?o Provide a safer environment?

• What do you think?o Should we slow down?o Proceed as per COV recommendations?o Should we try temporary closures to test?o Should it be built as planned (2a or 2b) or another

plan?o Should other stakeholders (ie – regional transit

planners) be included in the conversation?