the pleiades distance controversy

16
Slide 1 (of 16) The Pleiades Distance Controversy and Radio Emission from Young to Intermediate-Age Sun-like Main Sequence Stars Carl Melis NSF AAPF Fellow/UC San Diego CASS Postdoctoral Fellow In collaboration with: Mark Reid, Amy Mioduszewski, John Stauffer, Geoff Bower Credit & Copyright: Robert Gendler

Upload: others

Post on 27-Mar-2022

13 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Pleiades Distance Controversy

Slide 1 (of 16)

The Pleiades Distance Controversy and Radio Emission from Young to Intermediate-Age Sun-like Main Sequence Stars

Carl MelisNSF AAPF Fellow/UC San Diego CASS Postdoctoral Fellow

In collaboration with:Mark Reid, Amy Mioduszewski, John Stauffer, Geoff Bower

Credit & Copyright: Robert Gendler

Page 2: The Pleiades Distance Controversy

Slide 2 (of 16)

• Most well studied open cluster in the sky.• Used to define Zero-Age Main Sequence -> isochronal fitting to derive cluster distances.• Rotation as a function of age.• Best defined substellar locus of any cluster.• etc…

“The distance to the Pleiades can be used as an important first step to calibrate the cosmic distance ladder.” - Wikipedia

Page 3: The Pleiades Distance Controversy

Slide 3 (of 16)

The Pleiades Distance Controversy

Hipparcos DPleiades = 122.2±1.9 pcAll others DPleiades = 133.0±0.9 pc

Page 4: The Pleiades Distance Controversy

Slide 4 (of 16)

The Pleiades Distance Controversy

If Hipparcos is correct, then Pleiades and other similarly aged stars are ~0.2 magnitudes fainter than otherwise similar (but older) stars.

van Leeuwen 1999

�Theoretical models do notaccurately describe youngstars, calling into questionphotometric distance estimatesand in general our understandingof stellar evolution.

Page 5: The Pleiades Distance Controversy

Slide 5 (of 16)

VLBI to the rescue!

• Absolute trigonometricparallaxes

•Anchored on the radioreference frame

• sast ~ 100 µas

• ≈1% parallax precisionfor individual Pleiads

Page 6: The Pleiades Distance Controversy

Slide 6 (of 16)

Where are all the radio-loud Pleaids?

A decade of failure leading up to Lim & White (1995):

Quasi-steady flux level ~0.16 mJy.

Gemini Observatory/ Dana Berry, SkyWorks Digital Animation

Page 7: The Pleiades Distance Controversy

Slide 7 (of 16)

VLA and JVLA search for new radio Pleiads

• Target X-ray luminous, rapidly rotating stars.

• No other requirements!

F5 K1 K6

Page 8: The Pleiades Distance Controversy

Slide 8 (of 16)

VLBI Project BM352

• ~900 hours awarded with the VLBA, Green Bank, Effelsberg,and Arecibo antennas (HSA).

• 5 stars per year for a total programduration of ~2 years.

• 9 epochs per star over a 1 year period.

�One 10 hour track every week for twoyears!

Page 9: The Pleiades Distance Controversy

Slide 9 (of 16)

VLBI Project BM352 - Why 9 epochs?

• Periods < 2 yrsÞfull orbital fits;well matched toobserving cadence.

• Periods > 2 yrsÞfit motion withacceleration terms as in Loinard et al. (2007).

� Binarity!

Page 10: The Pleiades Distance Controversy

Slide 10 (of 16)

VLBI Project BM352 - Why 10 stars?

Pleiades half-mass and tidal radii of 1.9 (0.88°) and 16 pc (7.4°), respectively (Raboud & Mermilliod 1998).

Raboud & Mermilliod 1998

� Cluster depth effects!

Page 11: The Pleiades Distance Controversy

Slide 11 (of 16)

Preliminary Results - HII 1136Li

m &

Whi

te (1

995)

Most radio-luminous Pleaiddetected by Lim & White.

Page 12: The Pleiades Distance Controversy

Slide 12 (of 16)

HII 1136 detected in VLBI pilot surveys and main survey.

Preliminary Results - HII 1136March 2004 à August 2012

Page 13: The Pleiades Distance Controversy

Slide 13 (of 16)

Preliminary Results - HII 2147

HII 2147 resolved into a 50 mas (~6 AU) binary.

Page 14: The Pleiades Distance Controversy

Slide 14 (of 16)

Looking Ahead

• Complete first year of program and first 5 targets early 2013.

• VLBI slated for major sensitivityupgrade.

• JVLA should become available as anarray element.

Page 15: The Pleiades Distance Controversy

Slide 15 (of 16)

Binarity and Radio-Loud Young Sun-like Stars

HII 3197

2006 2011 2012

HII 2147PZ Tel

EK Dra

Page 16: The Pleiades Distance Controversy

Slide 16 (of 16)

Binarity and Radio-Loud Young Sun-like Stars

• Is binarity a necessary component for the most radio-luminousstars (even at young ages)?

• What does this tell us about the evolution of protoplanetarydisks and stellar angular momentum?