the platform for the industrial internet of things (iiot)
TRANSCRIPT
Your systems. Working as one.
DDS: Pla7orm for the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) Gerardo Pardo-‐Castellote, Ph.D.
RTI – The Core Nervous System for The Industrial IoT Dec 2014
IoT Changing Everything?
© 2014 RTI
Industrial IoT, Cyber-‐Physical Systems
© 2014 RTI
No, the Internet Didn’t Change Everything… … Yet • Discrete Manufacturing
– SQll used PLCs and Ladder Logic Programming • Energy Grids
– Designed for small number of “staQc” sources and loads
• Healthcare Device IntegraQon – No holisQc integraQon of devices, alarm faQgue & hospital error is a leading cause of death in the US
• Rail & TransportaQon • Oil & Gas • …
© 2014 RTI
GE: The next revoluQon
© 2014 RTI
How big a deal Is this?
6
* Projected savings are based on 1% efficiencies/savings
Opportunities across every industry
Source: Industrial Internet: Pushing the Boundaries (2012, Evans & Annuziata)
$66B fuel cost saving
in gas powered fleets
$90B reduction in
Cap X in oil & gas exploration and
development
68% decrease in crime rates with video
surveillance
$30B fuel cost saving
in aviation industry
$63B productivity
improvement in healthcare
92M vehicles with
Internet connectivity on
the road by 2016
$27B productivity
improvement in rail industry
Industrial Internet ConsorQum (IIC)
Testbeds Innova-on to drive new
products, processes, services
Technology & Security Architectural frameworks, standards requirements, interoperability, use cases,
privacy & security of Big Data
Community Companies joining together to advance innova-on, ideas, best prac-ces, thought leadership and
insights
The goal of the IIC is to drive innovaQon through be^er integraQon of the physical and digital worlds.
Source: h^p://iiconsorQum.org/tx-‐14/presentaQons/Soley_Opening_Keynote-‐9-‐15-‐14.pdf
The IIC: An Open Membership Consortium now 100+ companies strong
Content restricted to IIC Members only -‐ not for External PublicaQon
As of 8-‐8-‐2014
IIC Founder Companies
IIC Steering CommiEee
Legal Working Group
Marke-ng Working Group
Membership Working Group
Security Working Group
Technology Working Group
Testbeds Working Group
Thought Leadership CommunicaQons
Vocabulary Team
IIC Governance
IIC Staff
Data Mgmt & AnalyQcs Team
Framework Team
Use Cases Team
Industrial IoT vs Human IoT
______________________________________________________________________________ Page 1 10/29/2013 Connecting With the IIoT Copyright © 2013 Moor Insights & Strategy
Connecting with the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) The Network is the System This paper continues the Internet of Things (IoT) market segmentation Moor Insights & Strategy started in the previous research note, Behaviorally Segmenting the Internet of Things (IoT). Here we compare the Industrial IoT (IIoT) and the Human IoT (HIoT) at and near their end-points. Our comparison highlights near-term IIoT brownfield opportunities.
Executive Summary The primary difference between IIoT and HIoT over the next few years is that the IIoT will incorporate over a century of existing, brownfield infrastructure (deployed mechanical and digital systems ready to be connected) while HIoT is an emerging set of greenfield services and technologies that must build infrastructure as it grows. Designing for IIoT requires deep understanding of solution spaces and an ability to connect systems manufactured many decades apart. IIoT favors solutions vendors such as DIGI, Echelon, and Freescale, who have solid roots in the industrial control world. HIoT favors fast moving prototyping driven by leaps of faith in user experience (UX) and device design, exemplified by the Maker community in particular. The concept of “good enough” does not apply in the industrial world. Figure 1: IoT Segments by IIoT and HIoT
Experience Psychological Wellbeing
Health and Safety Physical Wellbeing
Self-‐Directed Autonomous
InteracQve Reac5ve
Source: Moore Insights report 2014
© 2014 RTI
© 2014 RTI
______________________________________________________________________________ Page 2 10/29/2013 Connecting With the IIoT Copyright © 2013 Moor Insights & Strategy
What’s the Difference? As mentioned in our previous IoT paper, IIoT end-points must be more robust than HIoT end-points. Sensors embedded in end-points are not much help if the data they generate can’t be collected and transmitted for analysis. We call these collection points “gateways.” Figure 2: Gateway Function in IoT
There are many vectors along which we can measure end-point “robustness.” Table 1 summarizes these vectors: Table 1: Near-term end-point differences between IIoT and HIoT
Attribute Industrial IoT (IIoT) Human IoT (HIoT) Market Opportunity Brownfield Greenfield Product Lifecycle Until dead or obsolete Whims of style and/or budget Solution Integration Heterogeneous APIs Vertically integrated Security Access Identity & privacy Human Interaction Autonomous Reactive Availability 0.9999 to 0.99999 (4–5 ‘9’s) 0.99 to 0.999 (2–3 ‘9’s) Access to Internet Intermittent to independent Persistent to interrupted Response to Failure Resilient, fail-in-place Retry, replace Network Topology Federations of peer-to-peer Constellations of peripherals Physical Connectivity
Legacy & purpose-built Evolving broadband & wireless
Example Gateways Commercial monitoring Echelon SmartServer
Consumer home automation Revolv Hub
Market Opportunity: “Brownfield” is a term borrowed from commercial real estate; it is used to denote a potential site for building development that had been previously developed for industrial or commercial use. IIoT uses brownfield to describe the opportunity to connect more than a century of in-service mechanical and electrical systems to the Internet and therefore to new cloud-based services and analytics back-ends. The equipment doesn’t need to be repurchased, it just needs new, connected sensors. HIoT devices come prepackaged with sensors, their sensors are difficult to impossible to replace or upgrade without replacing the whole device, and therefore an entire system represents new market development. Even in the case of wearables, like
Cloud
GatewayHub
Wireless
Collectively referred to as a
Gateway
Sensorsand
Actuators
Source: h^p://www.moorinsightsstrategy.com/wp-‐content/uploads/2013/10/ConnecQng-‐with-‐the-‐Industrial-‐Internet-‐of-‐Things-‐IIoT-‐by-‐Moor-‐Insights-‐Strategy.pdf
Industrial IoT versus Human IoT
Interac(on Style Event Driven, Pub-‐Sub Request / Response
Moore Insights report 2014
Where is the value? Consumer/Human IoT -‐> YOU • Data • Data at rest. Big Data. • Cloud CompuQng • Analysis, Knowledge
Industrial IoT -‐> Machines • Data • Data in MoQon. Real-‐Qme data • Fog compuQng • Control, Feedback, Physical AcQons & ReacQons
© 2014 RTI
© 2014 RTI
Copyright © 2013 Appinions. All rights reserved. The Internet Of Things - An Industry Influence Study | July 2014 Copyright © 2014 Appinions Inc. All rights reserved.
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
The 10 Most Influential Internet of Things Companies
Samsung announced the launch of Samsung Smart Home … Home automation with a single app. - Source: Yahoo News 04/02/2014
Apple announced partners for its HomeKit developer platform: Texas Instruments, Philips, Haier, Netatmo, Withings, Honeywell, Marvell, Osram and Broadcom. - Source: The Guardian 06/02/2014
[Google] paid $3.2bn for Nest Labs, maker of "smart home" appliances. - Source: Bdlive 04/02/2014
Vodafone announced plans to Cobra Automotive Technologies [strengthening] its hand in the M2M and connected cars. - Source: Mobile Money Live 06/16/2014
RANK NIS
1 757 Apple
2 549 Nest
3 243 Google
4 162 Intel
5 129 Microsoft
6 100 Cisco
7 94 Samsung
8 89 Vodafone
9 50 MediaTek
10 47 SecureRF
Semiconductor manufacturer MediaTek today announced their latest processor platform [LinkIt] targeted at wearables and Internet of Things. - Source: Mobile Geeks 06/03/2014
7
© 2014 RTI h^p://www.forbes.com/sites/brucerogers/2014/07/08/apple-‐and-‐google-‐dominate-‐internet-‐of-‐things-‐influence-‐with-‐home-‐automaQon-‐efforts/
The Industry is facing disrupQon
© 2014 RTI
If you don't like change, you're going to like irrelevance even less.”
- General Eric Shinseki, Chief of Staff, US Army
Example Industrial IoT Drivers
Many Industries are facing disrup-on: • Decentralized, dynamic energy generaQon and control
• TransportaQon value & funcQon becoming sooware-‐driven – Similar in farming
• Complexity explosion in medical devices/sensors
© 2014 RTI
Integra-on -me & cost
High
Low
Small Large System Scale
The Key Challenge: IntegraQon
Cost can increase exponen(ally with system size
Industrial IoT protocol soup
MQTT AMQP
ZeroMQ ICE
RabbitMQ OPC-‐UA
CAMEL
WebSphereMQ
TIBCO Informa-ca IBM
RedHat PrismTech
WebSockets AllJoyn
ThriY CoAP
RELOAD
DDS RTPS IoT
Industrial Internet RTI ZeroC
Axeda
ThingWorx/PTC
PracQcal ConnecQvity Requires NormalizaQon
DDS: Standards-‐based Data-‐Centric IntegraQon
Streaming Data Sensors Events
Real-‐Time Applica-ons
Enterprise Applica-ons HMI
© 2014 RTI
Service Invoca-ons Request Reply & RPC
Standard Infrastructure Services: Persistence, Record, …
Real-‐Time / IIoT DataBus
GC Dam (US Army Corps)
Largest power plant in North America • 6.8 GW • Fastest-‐responding major power
source on the Western Grid • Requires 24x7 operaQon • Live with RTI Connext DDS
RTI Connext DDS: • Deployed in control room, turbines • Met hard challenges:
– Extreme availability – Wide area communicaQons – MulQ-‐level rouQng – High security – Scalability > 100k data values
© 2014 RTI
© 2014 RTI
DocBox and Integrated Clinical Environment (ICE) Standard • Hospital error is the 6th leading cause of preventable death
• DocBox integrates devices to improve paQent safety
• RTI Connext DDS Qes together devices, services, and displays in real Qme
© 2014 RTI
“RTI Connext DDS met all our needs – whether we’re handling 12 patients, or 200.”
-- DocBox Founder, Tracy Rausch
Unite Real-‐Time, Mobile, and Cloud
• Largest EMS equipment provider supplies ER equipment to 60% of the world’s emergency vehicles
• Uses RTI Connext DDS for in-‐vehicle pla7orm, mobile device bus, cloud connecQvity
© 2014 RTI
IoT Leaves Earth
• RTI DDS used for internaQonal interoperability of roboQc assets of ESA, NASA and partners
• DDS used in ‘space’ on-‐board InternaQonal Space StaQon
• DDS backbone for roboQcs frameworks:
• Extensibility • Scalability • Configurability • flexibility
Dr. André Schiele, Head of TeleroboQcs & HapQcs Lab, ESA
Data DistribuQon Pla7orm for the Industrial IoT
World’s cri-cal Infrastructure Trusts RTI • World’s largest Wind Power company • World’s largest Underground Mining Equipment company • World’s largest Navy (all surface ships) • World’s largest AutomoQve company • World’s largest Emergency Medical System company • World’s largest Medical Imaging provider • World’s 2nd largest PaQent Monitoring manufacturer • World’s 2nd largest Air Traffic control system • World’s largest Broadcast Video Equipment manufacturer • World’s largest Launch Control System • World’s largest Telescope (under construcQon) • World’s 5th-‐largest Oil & Gas company • World’s 6th-‐largest power plant (largest in US) • All of world’s top ten defense companies
© 2014 RTI
RTI Company Snapshot • World leader in fast, scalable communicaQons sooware for real-‐Qme operaQonal
systems • Strong leadership in Aerospace and Defense, Industrial Control, AutomoQve,
Healthcare and more • Over 400,000 deployed licenses, ~800 designs, $1T designed-‐in value
• Based in Silicon Valley with Worldwide offices • Global leader in DDS
– Over 70% market share1
– Largest Embedded Middleware vendor2
– 2013 Gartner Cool Vendor – DDS authors, chair, wire spec, security, more
– First with DDS API and RTPS protocol – IIC steering commi^ee; OMG board
– Most mature & widely deployed soluQon
© 2014 RTI 1Embedded Market Forecasters 2VDC Analyst Report
Find out more… www.rQ.com
community.rQ.com
demo.rQ.com www.youtube.com/realQmeinnovaQons
blogs.rQ.com
www.twi^er.com/RealTimeInnov
www.facebook.com/RTIsooware
dds.omg.org
www.omg.org
h^p://www.iiconsorQum.org
© 2014 RTI
www.slideshare.net/GerardoPardo www.slideshare.net/RealTimeInnovaQons
Thank You!!
© 2014 RTI