SUMMER TRAINING PRESENTATION ON

PRESENTED BY NAME- ROHIT PRAKASH

ROLL NO-1512470112

UNDER THE GUIDANCE OF Ms. FARHANA JAMAL (ASSISTANT PROFESSOR)

“The perception of school management of schools of Lucknow towards smart classroom education’’

COMPANY PROFILECompany Name Mini planet global educare pvt. Ltd.

Type Private ltd. Company

Industry Education

Founded 2015

Headquarter Delhi

Key people Mrs.Abhilasha (M.D), Mrs. Savita(Director)

Services Smart class technology

Website www.myminiplanet.in

CIN U80904UP2015PTC071365

Registered office E-86 Lajpat nagar 2 , New Delhi

ABOUT MINI PLANETMiniPlanet is a venture , which is destined to bring a revolution in existing education system but it is just not limited to this only, it is a stride to foster the child brain, removing the bars of prejudice of old system, jaded thinking about education, letting the child think beyond the virtual and physical obstacles.

SWOT ANALYSIS STRENGTH WEAKNESS Well experienced sales team User friendly classroom solution

Best hardware

deeper penetration

As a new organization taking time to setup

Late entrant

Low capital

Needs to be more professional

OPPORTUNITIES THREATS Huge untapped market

Announcement for ICT policies

Growing educational sector

Competitors being in the market for many years

Competitors being the brand name, doing unprofitable business

Entrance of multinationals

Govt. Aided schools

OBJECTIVES

a) To find how many schools (school management) are aware of smart class technology.

b) To find how many schools have smart class solution.

c) To determine whether installing smart class solution in schools will enhance the result of the student.

d) To determine what factors of smart class technology attracts schools towards it.

e) To find out the reason of slow acceptance of smart class solution in the school.

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

Research problem: To Analyze the perception of School management towards smart class education.Research Design: Descriptive ResearchData collection: collected data from school managers through interview modeSampling: Random Sampling of Schools in LucknowSampling Tools: Interpretation is done by using the pie chart and inferences are drawn on the basis of the results obtained from Pie chart.Sample Size: 50

DATA ANALYSIS & INTERPRETATION

Are you aware of Smart class Solutions?

Yes74%

no26%

Response in percentage

Are you aware of Mini Planet as a Smart class Solution Provider?

yes38%

no62%

Response in percentage

Do you have Smart Classrooms in Schools?

yes28%

no72%

Response in percentage

Which Smart class Solution are you using?

Mini Planet8%

Educomp16%

others8%

not using68%

Response in percentage

What Reasons for not employing Smart classrooms?

expensive13%

lack of skilled faculty

32%

fees can-not be

increased53%

any other reason2%

Response in percentage

Which Factors you like most in Smart class solution?

Visual & Audio Effect22%

real time experience50%

con-ve-

nience28%

Response in percentage

FINDINGS

•Only 26% of schools are unaware of this technology and rest 74% are aware of this technology.•Only 38% of people know about miniplanet and rest 62% doesn’t know about miniplanet.•Most of the schools are using the product the company Educomp.•53% of the school management think that they have to increase the school fees if they introduce smart class.

SUGGESTIONS

•After the study the entire findings show that MiniPlanet Educare should concentrate more on pricing strategy.•From the analysis it is seen that inspite of its good product quality schools over lucknow are not aware of it threfore better promotion activities must be carried out for the same.•MiniPlanet Global Educare should also built contract with some kind of government aided or trust aided schools to capture the market.

CONCLUSION

•Majority of Schools are not Aware of Smart class Promotional Activities are Required for Awareness.

•Real time experience is one of the Unique selling Point of Smart class Solution.

•Major Barrier is Fees of School cannot be increased so easily.

LIMITATIONS

1. Duration of Project is not enough to make a conclusion on such a vast subject time constraint has become a big limitation.

2. Difficulty in convincing the school to find the proper information.

3. It is a sheer challenge in getting an appointment with the school.

4. The Management team of school was unwilling to share their details to a surveyor.

5. Lack of awareness in modern technology that we are using now days

BIBLIOGRAPHY

[1] Abimbade, A. (1997). Principles and Practice of Educational Technology. Ibadan: International Publishers. [2] Boster, Meyer, Roberto & Inge (2002) at Yahoo.com [3] C. Matt Graham, Scott Anchors & Brian E. Doore, ‘Student Learning Preferences and SMS Text Messaging: A Web 2.0 Large Classroom Engagement System’, International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Research, San Francisco. [4]Cavanaugh'ssynthesis(2001faculty.education.ufl.edu/cathycavanaugh/docs/VSresearch....

[5]-www.myminiplanet.in[6]- www.helixtechsolutions.com[7]- www.educomp.com

THANK YOU