the pendulum swings… risk as that was the only route to reasonable investment returns. in late...

4
SPRING 2018 | VOL. 25 | NO. 2 1. The Pendulum Swings... 2. Stock Performance in Times of Rising Interest Rates 3. Stock Performance...Rates (cont.) 4. From Which Account Should I Pay My IRA Fees? QUARTERLY PERSPECTIVE THE PENDULUM SWINGS… The market euphoria we experienced in January stemming from recent tax reform (the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act signed into law on December 22, 2017), quickly turned to pessimism as the Trump administration announced on March 1st the imposition of tariffs on steel and aluminum imports. The fear of a rapidly escalating trade war with China has caused investors to question the staying power of the synchronized global economic rebound that began in the fall of 2016. With nearly half of the earnings of the S&P 500 attributable to foreign revenues, these are legitimate concerns, but it is still not yet clear if this approach is simply a negotiating tactic or new U.S. international trade policy. The Impact of P/E Multiple Expansion & Contraction With earnings of the S&P 500 Index projected to climb by nearly 19% in 2018, investors are in a quandary as to how stock prices can be in swift decline while near term corporate earnings prospects appear to be so bright and positive. My response is simple: sometimes it is not so much the earnings of a company, but what an investor is willing to pay for the projected earnings. As an example, in both 2016 and 2017, as the globe was awash in central bank liquidity, investors bid up the price of U.S. common stocks. Nearly half of the % gain in the broad market was driven by a rising P/E multiple, increasing from a 17x multiple to over 20x by year end 2017. The inverse is true so far in 2018. The fear and uncertainty associated with rising interest rates, a growing U.S. deficit and recent trade war concerns have investors pulling in their horns and feeling more skeptical on full year earnings results. This is neither unusual, nor unique to 2018; it has been part of the market pricing dynamic from the very beginning. However, this we do know: over time the market price will eventually follow the direction of earnings within this fear/ greed bandwidth. Continued on page 4 S&P 500 % Change Year Price EPS P/E S&P 500 EPS P/E '00 $1,320.28 $56.78 23.3x '01 $1,148.08 $47.49 24.2x (13%) (16%) 4% '02 $879.82 $50.51 17.4x (23%) 6% (28%) '03 $1,111.92 $55.23 20.1x 26% 9% 16% '04 $1,211.92 $68.80 17.6x 9% 25% (13%) '05 $1,248.29 $78.56 15.9x 3% 14% (10%) '06 $1,418.30 $90.06 15.7x 14% 15% (1%) '07 $1,468.36 $87.45 16.8x 4% (3%) 7% '08 $903.25 $73.70 12.3x (38%) (16%) (27%) '09 $1,115.10 $61.95 18.0x 23% (16%) 47% '10 $1,257.64 $87.02 14.5x 13% 40% (20%) '11 $1,257.60 $98.89 12.7x (0%) 14% (12%) '12 $1,426.19 $105.21 13.6x 13% 6% 7% '13 $1,848.36 $111.29 16.6x 30% 6% 23% '14 $2,058.90 $118.89 17.3x 11% 7% 4% '15 $2,043.94 $118.59 17.2x (1%) (0%) (0%) '16 $2,238.83 $119.16 18.8x 10% 0% 9% '17 $2,673.61 $133.08 20.1x 19% 12% 7% '18* $2,640.87 $157.78 16.7x (1%) 19% (17%) * 3/31/2018 S&P 500 Price and Consensus EPS Estimates Source: Factset $56 $50 P $68 2 9 211 $1 4 0 ' $55 2 9 . 111 , $1 3 0 ' 2 8 $879 2 0 ' $47 8 0 . 148 , $1 1 0 ' 8 2 320 $1 0 0 ' E e c i r P r a e Y & S x % e % 25 % 9 6 17 0 8 $68 % 9 % 26 x 1 . 20 3 2 . $55 6 % 23 ( x 4 17 1 5 $50 ) % 16 ( ) % 13 ( x 2 . 24 9 4 . $47 3 23 8 7 $56 S P E 0 50 P & S E / P S P E g n a h C % 0 50 P ) e % % 13 ( 16 % % 28 ( 4 E / P $68 $90 $73 $87 $105 $118 $119 0 9 058 $2 4 1 ' $111 6 3 . 848 , $1 3 1 ' 9 1 426 $1 2 1 ' $98 0 6 . 257 , $1 1 1 ' 4 6 257 $1 0 1 ' $61 0 1 . 115 , $1 9 0 ' 5 2 $903 8 0 ' $87 6 3 . 468 , $1 7 0 ' 0 3 418 $1 6 0 ' $78 9 2 . 248 , $1 5 0 ' 2 9 . 211 , $1 4 0 ' $133 1 6 673 $2 7 1 ' 3 8 238 $2 6 1 ' $118 4 9 . 043 , $2 5 1 ' % % % % x % 3 17 9 8 $118 % % 6 % 30 x 6 . 16 9 2 . $111 6 % 13 x 6 13 1 2 $105 % 14 ) % 0 ( x 7 . 12 9 8 . $98 40 % 13 x 5 14 2 0 $87 ) % 16 ( % 23 x 0 . 18 5 9 . % 16 ( % 38 ( x 3 12 0 7 $73 ) % 3 ( % 4 x 8 . 16 5 4 . $87 15 % 14 x 7 15 6 0 $90 % 14 % 3 x 9 . 15 6 5 . $78 25 % 9 x 6 . 17 0 8 . $68 % 12 % 19 x 1 20 8 0 $133 0 % 10 x 8 18 6 1 $119 ) % 0 ( ) % 1 ( x 2 . 17 9 5 . $118 7 % 11 ) % % % % 23 7 % 12 ( % % 20 ( 47 % % 27 ( 7 % 1 ( % 10 ( % % 13 ( 7 9 % 0 ( 4 $157 * 3/31/2018 S&P 500 Price and Consensus EPS Estimates 7 8 640 $2 * 18 ' $133 1 6 . 673 , $2 7 1 % Source: Factset * 3/31/2018 S&P 500 Price and Consensus EPS Estimates 19 % 1 ( x 7 16 8 7 $157 % 12 % 19 x 1 . 20 8 0 . $133 % Source: Factset % 17 ( 7 PRICE/EARNINGS MULTIPLE [EXPANSION & CONTRACTION]

Upload: others

Post on 27-Apr-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: THE PENDULUM SWINGS… risk as that was the only route to reasonable investment returns. In late 2015, the Fed signaled the end of this policy cycle by bumping the Fed Funds target

SPRING 2018 | VOL. 25 | NO. 2

1. The Pendulum Swings...2. Stock Performance in Times

of Rising Interest Rates

3. Stock Performance...Rates (cont.)4. From Which Account

Should I Pay My IRA Fees?

Q U A R T E R L Y P E R S P E C T I V E

THE PENDULUM SWINGS…

The market euphoria we experienced in Januarystemming from recent tax reform (the Tax Cuts andJobs Act signed into law on December 22, 2017),quickly turned to pessimism as the Trumpadministration announced on March 1st the impositionof tariffs on steel and aluminum imports. The fear of arapidly escalating trade war with China has causedinvestors to question the staying power of thesynchronized global economic rebound that began inthe fall of 2016. With nearly half of the earnings of theS&P 500 attributable to foreign revenues, these arelegitimate concerns, but it is still not yet clear if thisapproach is simply a negotiating tactic or new U.S.international trade policy.

The Impact of P/E Multiple Expansion & ContractionWith earnings of the S&P 500 Index projected to climb

by nearly 19% in 2018, investors are in a quandary as tohow stock prices can be in swift decline while near termcorporate earnings prospects appear to be so bright andpositive. My response is simple: sometimes it is not somuch the earnings of a company, but what an investor iswilling to pay for the projected earnings. As an example, inboth 2016 and 2017, as the globe was awash in centralbank liquidity, investors bid up the price of U.S. commonstocks. Nearly half of the % gain in the broad market wasdriven by a rising P/E multiple, increasing from a 17xmultiple to over 20x by year end 2017. The inverse is true

so far in 2018. The fear and uncertainty associated withrising interest rates, a growing U.S. deficit and recent tradewar concerns have investors pulling in their horns andfeeling more skeptical on full year earnings results. This isneither unusual, nor unique to 2018; it has been part of themarket pricing dynamic from the very beginning.However, this we do know: over time the market price willeventually follow the direction of earnings within this fear/greed bandwidth. Continued on page 4

S&P 500 % ChangeYear Price EPS P/E S&P 500 EPS P/E'00 $1,320.28 $56.78 23.3x'01 $1,148.08 $47.49 24.2x (13%) (16%) 4%'02 $879.82 $50.51 17.4x (23%) 6% (28%)'03 $1,111.92 $55.23 20.1x 26% 9% 16%'04 $1,211.92 $68.80 17.6x 9% 25% (13%)'05 $1,248.29 $78.56 15.9x 3% 14% (10%)'06 $1,418.30 $90.06 15.7x 14% 15% (1%)'07 $1,468.36 $87.45 16.8x 4% (3%) 7%'08 $903.25 $73.70 12.3x (38%) (16%) (27%)'09 $1,115.10 $61.95 18.0x 23% (16%) 47%'10 $1,257.64 $87.02 14.5x 13% 40% (20%)'11 $1,257.60 $98.89 12.7x (0%) 14% (12%)'12 $1,426.19 $105.21 13.6x 13% 6% 7%'13 $1,848.36 $111.29 16.6x 30% 6% 23%'14 $2,058.90 $118.89 17.3x 11% 7% 4%'15 $2,043.94 $118.59 17.2x (1%) (0%) (0%)'16 $2,238.83 $119.16 18.8x 10% 0% 9%'17 $2,673.61 $133.08 20.1x 19% 12% 7%

'18* $2,640.87 $157.78 16.7x (1%) 19% (17%)

* 3/31/2018 S&P 500 Price and Consensus EPS Estimates Source: Factset

D

$56

$50

P

$6829211$140'$5529.111,$130'

28.$87920'$4780.148,$110'

82.320,$100'EecirPraeY

&S

x

%

e

%25%961708$68%9%26x1.2032.$55

6)%23(x4.1715.$50)%16()%13(x2.2494.$47

3.2387.$56SPE050P&SE/PSPE

gnahC%050P

)

)

e

%%13(

16

%%28(

4

E/P

$68

$90

$73

$87

$105

$118

$119

09.058,$241'$11163.848,$131'

91.426,$121'$9806.257,$111'

46.257,$101'$6101.115,$190'

52.$90380'$8763.468,$170'

03.418,$160'$7892.248,$150'

29.211,$140'

$13316673$271'38.238,$261'

$11849.043,$251'

%

%

)

%

%

x

%

3.1798.$118 %%6%30x6.1692.$111

6%13x6.1312.$105%14)%0(x7.1298.$98

40%13x5.1420.$87)%16(%23x0.1859.

%16()%38(x3.1207.$73)%3(%4x8.1654.$87

15%14x7.1560.$90%14%3x9.1565.$78

25%9x6.1708.$68

%12%19x12080$1330%10x8.1861.$119

)%0()%1(x2.1795.$1187%11

)

)

)

)

%

%

%

%23

)7

%12(

%%20(

47

%%27(

7

)%1(%10(

%

%13(

7

)9

%0(4

$157

* 3/31/2018 S&P 500 Price and Consensus EPS Estimates

78.640,$2*18'$13316.673,$271

%

Source: Factset* 3/31/2018 S&P 500 Price and Consensus EPS Estimates

19)%1(x7.1687.$157%12%19x1.2080.$133

)%

t

Source: Factset

%17(7

PRICE/EARNINGS MULTIPLE [EXPANSION & CONTRACTION]

Page 2: THE PENDULUM SWINGS… risk as that was the only route to reasonable investment returns. In late 2015, the Fed signaled the end of this policy cycle by bumping the Fed Funds target

Brian Christensen, CFASenior Vice President & CIO2

Beginning in 2008, in response tothe collapse of financial markets, theFederal Reserve initiated a period ofextremely accommodative monetarypolicy. The Fed Funds target rateentered 2008 at 4.25% and finishedthe year at 0.25%. For more thanseven years, historically low interestrates were maintained and proved tobe a driver of higher prices for alltypes of assets. The Fed managed toassure significant liquidity wasavailable in financial markets thusencouraging investors to assumegreater risk as that was the only routeto reasonable investment returns. Inlate 2015, the Fed signaled the end ofthis policy cycle by bumping the FedFunds target rate to 0.5%. We haveseen five additional increases to theFed Funds target rate since late 2015reaching the current level of 1.75% onMarch 21, 2018. While interest ratesare far from excessive or stifling U.S.economic growth, the message fromthe Fed is clear in that the path forinterest rates is higher.

So what does this mean for stockinvestors? History has proven thatstocks can move higher in tandemwith rising interest rates. However, akey issue is the initial level from whichinterest rate increases begin theirascent. The chart above provides aperspective on how the S&P 500responds to increases in the 10-YearU.S. Treasury Yield.As implied by the chart, stock

prices should respond favorably to

rising rates, particularly if initiatedfrom a low base. Historically, untilthe 10-Year Treasury yield reachesthe 6% level, stocks have been ableto generate positive monthlyaverage returns.Digging a little deeper into the

data, we identified six specific timeperiods when the 10-year Treasuryyield was climbing.

Continued on page 3

STOCK PERFORMANCE IN TIMESOF RISING INTEREST RATES

6 Years -0.5%66 YY

1.5%1.3%

1.9%

0.8%

-0.1%

S&P

500

% C

hang

e

2.5%

2.0%

1.5%

1.0%

.5%

0.0%

-0.5%

-1.0% 0% -3% 3% - 4% 6% - 7%4% to 5% 5% to 6% 7% +

3.35 19.29 13.92 (6.59

55:9%53.04 -1. 0 -75.2dleiYeotT-NY 10SU

M VWAPA04:55I)PT(d

SU

ecirP-)IPT(dleiYetoN-TY01S

C45.1:wLo32.9gh:Hi

-%%91.67hg:lyonthM

8

3

109

76

5

4

29'19'09'98'88'

00'99'89'79'69'59'49'39'

0'70'60'50'40'30'20'10'0

'51'41'31'21'11'01'90'80

71'61'

2.75

2

1

Source: FactSet

Source: Standard & Poor’s as of December 20, 2017

MONTHLY AVERAGE CHANGE IN S&P 500 DURING PERIODS OF RISING 10-YEAR TREASURY YIELDS

10 - Year Treasury Note Yield

Page 3: THE PENDULUM SWINGS… risk as that was the only route to reasonable investment returns. In late 2015, the Fed signaled the end of this policy cycle by bumping the Fed Funds target

3

CONTINUED FROM PAGE 2 : STOCK PERFORMANCE IN TIMES OF RISING INTEREST RATES

The table on the right identifiesthose six windows and the respectivereturns for the S&P 500,S&P 500 – Dividend Payers, andlarge value stocks as measured by theRussell 1000 Value Index. With the exception of the

November 1998 to February 2000timeframe (recall these dates as theTech Stock Bubble), both Value stocksand Dividend Payers performed wellrelative to the broad market. The Fed Funds futures market

currently indicates a 60% probabilityof another 0.25% rateincrease in eitherJune or Augustand a 42%probability of anadditional 0.25%increase in eitherSeptember orNovember. Manyeconomists arepredicting a totalof four increases in2018 which wouldsuggest possible

raises in June, September andDecember. Moderate, wellcommunicated increases in

interest rates should be tolerated byequity markets. Despite what appears

to be a return to morenormal marketvolatility, we believethe underlyingstrength in the U.S.economy andcontinued growthin corporateearnings willprovide the basisfor improvingstock prices.

In February, Mike Flaherty joined the firm as the newest Relationship Manager in the Peoria, ILoffice. Mike brings to DVI over 15 years of experience in the financial service and insuranceindustries, where, as a financial advisor and operations manager, he proved himself as an effectiveleader. He is also experienced in financial planning and insurance solutions.

Mike is a graduate of Illinois State University where he received his Bachelor’s of Science degreein Insurance. He is a Certified Financial Planner®, a Chartered Financial Consultant and aChartered Life Underwriter. Additionally, he has held the FINRA Series 7 and 63 securitieslicenses and a Producer’s License in Life, Health, Property, Casualty, and Variable Contracts.

As a relationship manager at DVI, Mike's responsibilities will include the oversight andcoordination of the delivery of the DVI Service Model to our clients. In addition, Mike willintroduce ancillary services to clients that will enhance their overall experience with DVI.

Mike is also an active member of his community, serving on the board of directors for the Boys& Girls Club of Bloomington-Normal and previously as an Ambassador for the McLean CountyChamber of Commerce.

MIKE FLAHERTY, Relationship Manager

Index 1993 1998 2003 2009 2012 2016

Starting 11/01/93 11/01/98 07/01/03 01/01/09 08/01/12 08/01/16

Ending 01/31/95 02/29/00 07/31/04 04/30/10 12/31/13 02/28/18

S&P 500 TR USD 3.35 19.29 13.92 (6.59) 25.75 17.45

S&P 500 – Dividend Payers 4.75 (0.97) 22.40 (1.28) 30.56 14.61

Russell 1000 Value TR USD 0.66 3.01 17.81 (7.77) 27.98 12.56

Source: FactSet

RISING RATE WINDOWS – STOCK PERFORMANCE

Page 4: THE PENDULUM SWINGS… risk as that was the only route to reasonable investment returns. In late 2015, the Fed signaled the end of this policy cycle by bumping the Fed Funds target

Quarterly Perspective is published quarterly by David Vaughan Investments, LLC. Copyright 2018 by David Vaughan Investments, LLC. All rights reserved.This newsletter represents opinions of DVI and are subject to change from time to time and do not constitute a recommendation to purchase and sale any security nor to

engage in any particular investment strategy. The information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable but cannot be guaranteed for accuracy.David Vaughan Investments, LLC | Peoria, IL | Winter Park, FL | www.dviinc.com

4 Will Williams Chairman, President & CEO

CONTINUED FROM PAGE 1 : THE PENDULUM SWINGS...

Bear Market DownturnsAfter a prolonged Bull Market, some say the current rally is

“long in the tooth,” so there is a natural tendency to expect asignificant market decline. Year-to-date in 2018, we haveexperienced a market correction—a decline from the prior peakof at least ten percent. A Bear Market, however, is defined by amarket decline of twenty percent or more.

Research would suggest that in the modern economic era,significant market downturns are generally associated withrecessions caused by (1) over aggressive Fed Policy or (2) acommodity price spike in crude oil. The other prominent factorsare market speculation and extreme valuation applied to certain economic sectors or to the market as a whole.

As we assess the current state, we certainly have a risinginterest rate environment, though the Fed has been veryincremental and transparent in its execution. Market speculationis present in a handful of well known technology companies thathave provided growth stock leadership over the past 15 months

or so, but that is not widespread. The economic forecastscontinue to maintain a 2.5% or greater GDP growth rate for2018 with both tax reform and fiscal policy supporting the U.S.economic engine. For the time being, it is hard to anticipate themarket falling off a cliff with this as the economic backdrop.

DVI MARKS MILESTONES AT THE OCTOBER BLOOD DRIVE

DVI is pleased to welcome Candace Forrest as our new Client Services Associate in the Winter Park, FLoffice. Candace is a graduate of the University of Central Florida with a Bachelors in Finance. With over 10years of experience, she has assembled a broad set of skills in the wealth management industry. Prior to joiningDVI, Candace worked as a Senior Client Solutions Specialist at PNC Wealth Management where she earnednumerous awards in recognition of her achievements and outstanding service.

As a Client Services Associate, Candace provides support to the Winter Park Advisory Team and isresponsible for assisting with our clients’ daily service needs, including client documentation, new accountsetups, asset transfers and cash management requests. In addition, she handles the front desk and officeadministration in our Winter Park Office: greeting clients and setting up for client meetings.

Candace and her husband Danny stay busy with their son and daughter, Dylan and Ella, and you can oftenfind them outdoors doing something water related such as going to the beach or boating on the lake withtheir family. They also enjoy taking their kids to visit Walt Disney World where they hold annual passes.

CANDACE FORREST, Client Services Associate

Dec-61 l

Nov-68 l l

Jan-73 l

Nov-80 l l

Aug-87 l

Jul-90 l l

Mar-00 l l

Oct-07 l l

Source: JP Morgan, National Bureau of Economic Research

Macro Environment

1990 - Iraq invades Kuwait

Tech Crash of 1970

Stagflation - OPEC Oil Embargo

(Volcker) FED Tightening

1987 Crash - Portfolio Insurance

Dot.com (Boom and Bust)

Global Financial Crisis

Flash Crash 1962 - Cuban Missile Crisis

MarketPeak

Modern Era - Bear MarketDownturns

Recession CommoditySpike

ExtremeValuation

FedPolicy

1987 Crash - Portfolio Insurance

)

(Volcker) FED Tightening

Stagflation - OPEC Oil Embargo

1990 - Iraq invades Kuwait

Flash Crash 1962 - Cuban Missile Crisis

7

redoM

1987 Crash - Portfolio Insurance

Jul-90

(Volcker) FED Tightening

Stagflation - OPEC Oil Embargo

Tech Crash of 1970

1990 - Iraq invades Kuwait

Flash Crash 1962 - Cuban Missile Crisis

Aug-87

Nov-80

Jan-73

Nov-68

Dec-61

eceRDownturns

tekraMraeB-arEnPeak

tekraM

tnemnorivnEorcaM

PolicydeF

ValuationemertxE

SpikeytidommoConisse

Global Financial Crisis

) Dot.com (Boom and Bust)

Global Financial Crisis Oct-07

Dot.com (Boom and Bust)

Source: JP Morgan, National Bureau of Economic Research

Mar-00

ational Bureau of Economic Research

This is a question we are receiving frequently after thepassage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in December 2017.With investment management fees no longer eligible as amiscellaneous itemized deduction, does it still make sense tohave IRA fees collected from a taxable account, or shouldthose fees now be collected from the IRA?

When the IRA investment management fee was fullydeductible when paid with outside dollars, it was pretty clearcut that it was best to pay this fee from a taxable account andallow the IRA dollars continued tax deferred growth. Nowthat investment advisory fees are not deductible, is this stillthe case? If the fee continues to be collected from a taxableportfolio, the upside remains in that those retained dollars in

the IRA account continue to compound and grow tax free.However, there also is upside to collecting fees from the IRAas well, in that this payment is being made on a pre-tax basis.So which upside should you choose?

Tax deferred compounding can ultimately surpass thebenefit of the tax deduction, but this could take anywherefrom 20 to 40 years, depending on both tax and growth rateassumptions. This means that clients with very long timehorizons are likely better off to pay the IRA fee with outsidedollars. For clients with a shorter time horizon (such ascurrent retirees), it is likely best to deduct the fee directlyfrom the IRA account to get the full pre-tax value.

FROM WHICH ACCOUNTSHOULD I PAY MY IRA FEES?