the paradox of free
DESCRIPTION
Free is the prevailing business model of the online world, but this way of doing business is costing us too much.TRANSCRIPT
THE PARADOX OF FREE
Image by Nathan Congleton
By William Macfarlane
Free is the prevailing business model of the online world
Image by Thomas Hawk
Giving away services and software is the fastest way to build a large network of users
Image by Elventear
And popularity is the currency of the web
Image by Emanuele Rosso
The freeconomy motto:“Be the first to give away what others charge for”
Examples: Craiglist Wikipedia Skype
Image by Piermario
- Chris Anderson (Wired)
Ironically, the free business model is making a lot of money
Evernote, Twitter and Facebook are all free and worth over 1 Billion USD
Image by Johnny Vulkan
Consumers get things for free and developers make money for their good work
This looks like a win-win situation
Image by Eviloars
But, getting things for free comes with a heavy price
Image by dalioPhoto
Like privacy
The price we pay for a “free” Facebook is the sale of our personal information, used for user-specific advertising
Image by Ian B. Line
"The only way to get around the privacy problems inherent in advertising-supported social networks is to pay for services that we value"
Image by Frederic Poirot
- Alexis Madrigal (The Atlantic)
Because “when the product is free, you are the product”
- Ellis Hamburger (The Verge)
Image by *L
There are also significant expenses hidden in externalities- the costs that aren’t reflected in price
Image by US Marine Corp
For example, the energy expense of two google searches is approximately the same amount as boiling a kettle of water
Image by Benjamin Lehman
The total amount of google searches in 2011 was 1,722,071,000,000
Image by Benjamin Lehman
This environmental tax is the price we pay for google’s “free” service
a
Image by Agustan Ruiz
The freeconomy has also brought about serious challenges for the app world
Image by Pamhule
The price of our free app culture is software that often lacks accountability to those who use it
Image by Hani Amir
Free apps are frequently bought out by large companies, severing the apps relationship to its users
Examples:OinkStamped Punchfork
Image by Pascal Charest
"I really liked Punchfork, this sucks. It is a major pain to pull all of my information out. I don’t have the time time to move all 231 Likes.”
- TechCrunch commenter Kevin Rank
Image by dgies
There has been an out cry from developers that the only way for a healthy app culture to exist is if more people pay and more developers charge
Image by Dave Whitley
"Whether it’s in advertising, selling your data, or losing the service altogether, I think users are starting to see the cost of choosing free apps and services”
Image by Stephen Geyer
- Paul Mayne (Day One founder)
We all love free things, but maybe this freeconomy is not serving us as well as one where we paid a little more
Image by Mark Nye
“When the transaction is between you and the people who made the thing you want, there is a great relationship - a responsibility - that you don't get any other way"
Image by Ed Ivanushkin
- David Chartier(AgileBits)
The paradox here is that free is just too expensive
Image by Slayer925
Sourceshttp://www.theverge.com/2013/1/7/3835724/the-price-of-appshttp://www.wired.com/techbiz/it/magazine/16-03/ff_free?currentPage=allhttp://howto.wired.com/wiki/Make_Money_Around_Free_Contenthttp://appcubby.com/blog/the-sparrow-opportunity/http://www.economist.com/node/10094757http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/12/why-you-should-want-to-pay-for-software-instagram-edition/266367/http://smallbusiness.chron.com/advertising-revenue-facebook-13701.htmlhttp://www.forbes.com/sites/gregsatell/2013/02/21/how-much-is-facebook-really-worth/
Image by Bethan
All images are licensed under the Creative
Commons Non-Commercial Share-Alike
3.0 agreement and sourced from flickr
Image by Cameron Russell