the oriental atlantis: critical notes on india's first biennale
TRANSCRIPT
8/9/2019 The Oriental Atlantis: Critical Notes on India's First Biennale
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-oriental-atlantis-critical-notes-on-indias-first-biennale 1/23
1
THE ORIENTAL ATLANTIS:
CRITICAL NOTES ON INDIA'S FIRST BIENNALE
SANDIP K LUIS
Research Student
Visual Studies, School of Arts and AestheticsJawaharlal Nehru University
New Delhi
This is a longer version of an article that appeared in the Economic & Political Weekly,
MAY 17, 2014 Vol. XLIX No 20
8/9/2019 The Oriental Atlantis: Critical Notes on India's First Biennale
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-oriental-atlantis-critical-notes-on-indias-first-biennale 2/23
2
THE ORIENTAL ATLANTIS:
CRITICAL NOTES ON INDIA'S FIRST BIENNALE
SANDIP K LUIS
Research StudentVisual Studies, School of Arts and Aesthetics
Jawaharlal Nehru University
Abstract: This article critically looks at the recent Kochi Muziris Biennale and a few important
exhibits in the background of the controversies they created. In order to problematise Biennale’s
ideology of cosmopolitanism, through which the organizers tried to surpass the existing
institutions of art and democracy, I will dwell upon the issues of spectatorship and thediscursivity of art practices. The argument I make here is that there is a shift away from the
principles of dissent and radical egalitarianism in the course of contemporary Indian art. The
Biennale is an exemplary case of this turn for its biased interpretation of Kerala’s cultural
history and the uncriticality of most of its exhibits, in which process, the dialogical and
dialectical relationship between the artist and the viewer is undermined.
Keywords: Kochi Muziris Biennale, Cosmopolitanism, Democracy, Spectatorship,
Contemporary Indian Art, Kerala
[I am extremely grateful to Prof. Rustom Bharucha for his support and guidance that made my
arguments sharper and better organised. I also acknowledge Prof. Parul Dave Mukherji for her
suggestions and encouragement and Meera Gopakumar for her continuous assistance and
feedbacks in writing this article. And I thank the Kerala Lalit Kala Academy and the Govt.
College of Fine Arts, Trissur, for recently giving me an opportunity to present a Malayalam
version of this paper and thereby helping me enrich it with new observations. The critical
commentary from the anonymous reviewer of EPW has been significantly helpful in verifying
and refining some of my arguments.]
8/9/2019 The Oriental Atlantis: Critical Notes on India's First Biennale
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-oriental-atlantis-critical-notes-on-indias-first-biennale 3/23
3
India’s first biennale is over. The transnational exhibition of contemporary art designed to take
place every two years, known as ‘Kochi Muziris Biennale’ was held at Kerala’s business capital,
Kochi, from December 2012 to March 2013. The organisers of the Biennale claim that it opened
the doors of Indian contemporary art to the opportunities and challenges of global art, and
rejuvenated Kerala’s inactive artworld. Along with such self-esteemed claims about the Kochi
Muziris Biennale (hereafter KMB), there remains numerous controversies regarding its curatorial
administration—notably, the heated debate over the dubious procedures of public fund allocation
and expenditure, the complete exclusion of government agencies like Kerala Lalit Kala Academy
and Government Fine Arts Colleges from the decision-making bodies of the Biennale, the
validity of the organisers’ recent claim that KMB was a failure in being a profitable venture but a
success in introducing Indian art to the world, and the Kerala Government’s recent decision to
withdraw the vigilance enquiry by allocating the additional fund of Rs. 4 crore despite the
official reports of financial irregularities, an act subsequently stayed by the Kerala High Court.i
The objective of this article is neither to introduce the ‘idea of biennale’ for its newness in the
Indian context nor to evaluate KMB’s success and failure from the vantage point of an ‘ideal
biennale’.ii Instead, my attempt is to shift the focus away from the above mentioned
controversies regarding KMB’s institutional structure and financial expenditure in order to grasp
the underlying politics of artworks and spectatorial experience by asking as to how a global and
controversial event named ‘Kochi Muzirs Biennale’ was experienced as well as comprehended
within the restrictive limits of the local. Problematising the organisers’ claim that KMB
‘democratised art,’ I will argue that this vastly exaggerated claim has been made not only at the
expense of any serious engagement with institutional procedures in a democratic framework, as
the controversies I mentioned above suggest, but also by disdaining certain principles of art and
democracy in a larger context. In this sense, this essay is not a review of the exhibition and its
curatorial design, but a critique of KMB’s ideological presuppositions among which the idea of
‘cosmopolitanism’ plays the most determining role in deciding the event’s basic aesthetic.
THE ORIENTAL ATLANTIS
What one may note in all the euphoria around KMB is the similarities it has with the
liberalisation rhetoric of the early 1990s in India.iii
KMB’s conceptual note starts like this:
8/9/2019 The Oriental Atlantis: Critical Notes on India's First Biennale
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-oriental-atlantis-critical-notes-on-indias-first-biennale 4/23
4
“There couldn’t have been a better space than Kochi for symbolic free speech; a space for
expressions created and leveraged by the various social activist movements.” This liberal and
expansive vision is further complemented by the next paragraph:
Kochi Muziris Biennale explores the possibilities of blurring the boundaries, in ageographical region where boundaries are blurred in a local and cosmopolitan
way, where the surroundings offer inspiration by way of the character of the placeone can exhibit in. It can generate response to something that is already there as a
public space in the neighborhoods, where perceived political content has been a
major determinant of what survives and of what gets created as art in the first
place.iv
Having lived most of my life in Kochi, I am surprised to read such statements. Though
Malayalis are popularly known as well-educated and sufficiently modernised or even
‘cosmopolitanised’, it is impossible to regard these features as the ideal conditions for good art. Nevertheless, because of the continuing caste/gender inequalities and the influential role of
religious groups in deciding cultural/educational policies of the state, the overblown secular and
egalitarian image of Malayali society has always appeared to me as a dubious construct.v I am
always perplexed by the fact that despite the highly developed socio-economic situation in
Kerala compared to other Indian states, which is generally described as ‘the Kerala model of
development’, our artists have never found Kerala’s cultural sphere to be particularly friendly to
their creative pursuits. Instead, what we have seen over the years is a mass migration of Malayali
artists to other parts of India (although interestingly, this has not been the case with Malayali
writers, poets and dramatists in general). Then why, all of a sudden, does Kerala become the
most desired destination of contemporary cutting-edge art, and why did this situation not exist
before? If the answer to this question lies in the allegedly cosmopolitan and progressive outlook
of Keralites, then how does one account for the huge exodus of Malayali artists to other
metropolitan cities, which even the organisers of KMB were part of? Maybe the answer lies not
in the quasi-secular and imperfect egalitarian character of Kerala society in general and the
people of Kochi in particular, but in the invention of a mythical and utopian place called Muziris
to complement the malfunctioning Malayali public sphere.
Muziris was an ancient seaport and urban centre that existed from around the 1st century AD,
which was developed during the period of the Chera dynasty. From the 6th
century onwards, it
8/9/2019 The Oriental Atlantis: Critical Notes on India's First Biennale
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-oriental-atlantis-critical-notes-on-indias-first-biennale 5/23
5
mysteriously disappeared from every known map of antiquity. Today it is widely presumed that
there was a catastrophic cyclone in 1341 which drowned the port-town in a massive flood,
completely altering the region’s geography. The recent discovery of the lost town created a huge
controversy among Kerala’s historians along with contestations on the presence of Buddhist
culture in the region.
It is the additional ornamentation of Muziris as the land of milk and honey, cultural exchange
and cohabitation, that provides the feeble conceptual ground of KMB. Leaving aside numerous
issues around the history of Muziris like the understudied conflictual trade relations of Jews,
Romans, Arabs, Jains and the local inhabitants, the tragic disappearance of Buddhist culture and
the violent establishment of Brahmanism and its caste-system and among other factors,vi
KMB’s
version of this ancient port-town represents a false history in the guise of making a utopian future
possible in the here and now. The ancient port city that sunk into the ocean of oblivion becomes
an oriental Atlantis and resurfaces as a new site of cultural ideals. But if it is a certain chunk of
human history that was engulfed by water as this narration would have us believe, then what we
see in KMB is an eclipse of human history itself by different variations of the flood myth. Along
with the disappearance of history, a story of struggle and dissent also disappears. It is this
replacement of committed historicity by mere histrionics that drives many artworks displayed in
KMB, including that of Subodh Gupta and Vivan Sundaram.
Installations by Subodh Gupta and Vivan Sundaram: Kochi Muziris Biennale, 2013
8/9/2019 The Oriental Atlantis: Critical Notes on India's First Biennale
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-oriental-atlantis-critical-notes-on-indias-first-biennale 6/23
6
Subodh Gupta’s large traditional boat of coastal Kerala, containing randomly collected objects
of everyday life, effortlessly evokes the feeling of migration and departure/arrival. Though the
answer to the crucial question, what causes migration in the here and now, was deliberately left
vague on account of the artwork’s alleged ‘complexity’ (a term which recurs in the popular
media when talking about the installations exhibited in the Biennale), for an average Malayali
the artwork was easily understood within the context of recent fear-mongering ‘flood narratives’
which have proliferated around the Mullaperiyar Dam and tsunami related tragediesvii
. This
paranoia in the popular unconsciousness about the coming Deluge was further reinforced by
Vivan Sundaram. Using the discarded shards from the excavation site, he tried to recreate the
‘lost civilisation’ of Muziris. The visual result was a flat simulacrum of the existing popular
imagination about the historical site as a ghost town of unidentifiable ruins and muddy relics,
reminiscent of a grand past lingering in shallow melancholy. By indirectly complementing
humanity’s age-old ‘flood myth’ and making use of the narrative’s global currency in the
contemporary post-tsunami era, Sundaram reinforced the ideological credentials of KMB, which
are not only ahistorical, but anti-historical.
In all these cases, the real protagonist is Nature in all its power and grandeur. This
replacement of historical forces by natural powers also reveals that history as we understand it
today is ultimately determined by the autonomous laws of nature. It is by substituting history
with nature that the popularised story of Muziris city meets the contemporary versions of
eschatological imagination (I will elaborate on this point while discussing Vivek Vilasini’s
artworks). If history is understood as a fall from the Eden of cosmopolitan life in which everyone
lived as sons of God (remember St. Paul’s version of cosmopolitanism), and also if the
momentum of history is seen as driven by natural forces that vary from great natural calamities
to our simple sinful drives, then what is left for us to do is the retrieval of our lost innocence.
But the notion of ‘innocence’ has always been an ideological category designed to eradicate the
subjects’ critical rationality and to inculcate an unconditional belief in the messiahs from otherworlds. That is why there is an invocation of spiritual metaphors in the KMB conceptual note
when it says: “[KMB] is the allure of possibilities that inspired the great thinkers and saints to
8/9/2019 The Oriental Atlantis: Critical Notes on India's First Biennale
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-oriental-atlantis-critical-notes-on-indias-first-biennale 7/23
7
embark on numerous adventures—of the body and the mind.” But how radical are their
adventures?
THE IMPOSSIBILITY OF CRITICALITY
According to KMB’s conceptual note:
[Kochi’s cosmopolitanism] is one that is at the crux of the civilisational crisis—
one that is economical, ideological and, thereby geo‐ political. The compendium
of these complexities is what gives this Biennale a context and an enquiry. […]Conflicts that lend a modern explanation for the mutual distrust and misgivings
that pervades in not just the immediate society but also snapping at the delicate
fabric of India’s assertion as a nation‐state and the globe that is ironically
celebrating its flat character at the same time.
What we have to note in this vague statement is a subtle but clear contradiction. Ifcosmopolitanism is an ideology of transcending national boundaries and imagining a global
community, then on what grounds can we expect that it is sympathetic to the ‘delicate fabric of
the Indian nation-state’?
Even long before the Third International’s famous distinction between ‘bourgeois
cosmopolitanism’ and ‘proletarian internationalism’ Frederic Engels said that ‘the fraternisation
of nations, as it is now being carried out everywhere by the extreme proletarian party [is] in
contrast to the old instinctive national egoism and to the hypocritical private-egotisticalcosmopolitanism of free trade’ (Engels 1845). Though reading this sentence in the ‘post-Soviet
era’ and withered proletarian internationalism necessitates critical revaluations, one thing is
undoubtedly clear. The space left by the progressive communist politics does not invalidate the
analytical distinction Engels had put forward for a simple reason: the extreme vulnerability and
easy adaptability of cosmopolitan humanitarianism for the sinister objectives of oligarchic
capital (Amin 2011:130). Hence, the daunting question of our time is this: what can be regarded
as the ‘outside’ of cosmopolitanism other than the ideologies of nationalist/racist parochialism or
religious fundamentalism?
The task of this essay is not to answer this massive question but to emphasise the need for a
radical outside, assuming that there cannot be a critical voice other than from the ‘outside’.viii
It
8/9/2019 The Oriental Atlantis: Critical Notes on India's First Biennale
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-oriental-atlantis-critical-notes-on-indias-first-biennale 8/23
8
is by looking from this vantage point that the KMB’s pretension of criticality collapse into its
own self-contradictions. Its conceptual note says: “Critical imagery can only have its genesis in a
shared space where celebrations of ethnicity or historical themes can collapse into metonymic
utterances that cancel the distinctions between places and boundaries, aesthetics and politics,
between life and art.” Here is the paradox. We are familiar with the great avant-garde dream of
unifying life and art, aesthetics and politics (Burger 1984:92). But this was a self-consciously
fashioned objective of avant-garde art and not a presupposed condition to practise art, as is the
case of KMB. What is the function of the so called ‘critical imageries’ within an ideal space of
no division when criticism by definition is a gesture of partisanship and an act of separation? In
other words, what is there as ‘outside’ to the grand unified space claimed by KMB? If there isn’t
any, then the conclusion is that what we are encountering here is a criticism with reformatory
interest, not radical concern.
The idea of a unified/self-contained space also means that there is no dialogue / conflict
between the artworks produced / exhibited within the ideal world of KMB. If this is the case,
then the only ‘Other’ that these artworks and artists face is the viewer. By following the
quotidian sense of the term, ‘viewer’ is a form of subjectivity which does not take part in the
production and reproduction of the artwork. Hence, potentially, the viewer is outside the work of
art as its other. But whoever tries to create a separate space outside the conceptual premises of
KMB can only be seen as a subject of regressive sensibilities because the Biennale is already the
seat of all desired virtues like cosmopolitanism, free speech and cultural cohabitation.
Since there is no space available outside the Biennale other than as a deviation from its
unquestionable ideals, it is not at all difficult to see that this outside is constituted by a dual
agency: the spectator-subject as the ‘other’ of artwork and the citizen-subject as the ‘other’ of the
cosmopolitan artist. This latter point is well explained on the website of the Biennale Foundation.
It says: “The Kochi-Muziris Biennale seeks to create a new language of cosmopolitanism and
modernity, [and] to reflect the new confidence of Indian people who are slowly, but surely,
building a new society that aims to be liberal, inclusive, egalitarian and democratic.” Given the
facts that India is already the ‘world’s largest democracy’ despite its inherent caste/class
contradictions, and a primary example of third world modernity, it is not at all clear in this
8/9/2019 The Oriental Atlantis: Critical Notes on India's First Biennale
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-oriental-atlantis-critical-notes-on-indias-first-biennale 9/23
9
statement as to what KMB actually intends to do. Despite the lack of clarity, what is evident here
is nothing but a desire to paternalise Indian people, through the comprador figure of the
‘Cosmopolitan-Indian Artist’. It is not difficult to see that the ‘other’ of this glorified mediatory
figure is the belittled figure of the third-world citizen-spectator. And it is through him/her that we
are compelled to mark an outside space of resistance for further investigations.
SELF-PORTRATIS OF AN ARROGANT ARTWORLD
'Celebration in the Laboratory’, Photography installation by Atul Dodiya: Kochi Muziris Biennale, 2013
Atul Dodiya’s ‘Celebration in the Laboratory’ displayed unnamed photographs of his friends
from the artworld (varying from artists to buyers) along with a few portraits of western masters
of art. The selective and tension-free history that Dodiya narrates is in sync with the overall
project of KMB because of their common denominator of cosmopolitan rhetoric. Whereas the
ideology of cosmopolitanism conceives the whole world as a big family, as the cliché of
vasudhaiva kutumbakam suggests, Dodiya’s installation depicts his “personal view of the Indian
art scene exactly like a large joint family.”ix
Dodiya further says that the site of exhibition was a
laboratory before and he wanted to use this aspect of the space as part of the concept of his
installation. Indeed, on the KMB website, it is stated that “[The] laboratory is the place where a
scientist experiments and here the artist [Dodiya] becomes a scientist using the ‘white cube’ of
an old chemical lab to evoke a chemistry between the art and the viewer.”x
8/9/2019 The Oriental Atlantis: Critical Notes on India's First Biennale
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-oriental-atlantis-critical-notes-on-indias-first-biennale 10/23
10
The simple question here is: what is it that makes these photographs of the artist’s friends
exhibition-worthy? In other words, what is it that an ordinary viewer is supposed to read from
these unnamed photographs, other than a self-enclosed ‘great and joyous joint family of art’ to
which s/he is still a stranger? The boastful images of Indian artists with luxury cars or
participating in glamorous cocktail parties blunt the viewer’s critical sense because the audacious
arrogance and unabashed flamboyance s/he encounters here are after all the private matters of a
big family which does not have anything to do with the outside-public world. The paternalistic
feudal romance of our family-man is also designed to absorb the voices of dissent, especially that
of the younger generation: for example, note the photograph of Johny M L, a Malayali art critic
based in Delhi, who struggles to create a parallel artworld under his curatorial title and has
openly challenged KMB’s curatorial agenda, if not its ideology as such.xi
‘Between One Shore and Several Others’, Digital Prints by Vivek Vilasini, Kochi Muziris Biennale, 2013
Whereas Atul Dodiya’s arrogance lies in treating viewers as mere specimens of an imaginary
laboratory, in the case of Vivek Vilasini’s artwork the arrogance can be discerned in his
understanding of history itself. His exhibition of prints titled as ‘Between One Shore and Several
Others’ gives us a clearer understanding of the idea of aestheticised arrogance that we have
discussed above. In Vilasini’s work we find that the artist is a powerful presence effortlessly
intruding on the existing narratives of history, upon whom the dead and flattened icons of the
past fall as mere ephemeral shadows. In a series of self-portrait photographs, the artist’s face is
unabashedly superimposed by the projected images of famous personalities like Che Guera,
Malcom X, Mother Teresa, B R Ambedkar, Sree Narayana Guru, and M K Gandhi. The spirits of
8/9/2019 The Oriental Atlantis: Critical Notes on India's First Biennale
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-oriental-atlantis-critical-notes-on-indias-first-biennale 11/23
11
historical past from all over the world are conjured up here by the shamanic artist for some
unaccountable reason. This strange spiritual cosmopolitanism that the artist seems to be claiming
here is surprising on many accounts. Without taking the incommensurability between most of the
historical figures into consideration — for example the fierce ideological battle between Gandhi
and Ambedkar on the issue of Dalits — the common link that connects these photographs is the
artist’s enlightened face and the blurred background of book shelves. What ‘synthesises’ the
projected luminous image with the self-portrait photograph is a cheap visual trick; adjusting one
eye of the image to coincide exactly with one of the artist’s eyes. The vulgar result which
Vilasini confidently presents as a sign of intellectual companionship inadvertently reveals the
artist’s impaired historical vision: the cyclopean perception of history as one-dimensional and
unilateral.
'Last Supper Gaza', Digital Print on Archival Canvas by Vivek Vilasini, Kochi Muziris Biennale, 2013
It is through the signals of this weakened artistic vision that we have to understand another
work by Vivek Vilasini known as ‘Last Supper Gaza’, displayed on the opposite wall. It is a
recreation of Leonardo da Vinci’s iconic ‘Last Supper’, featuring thirteen young women clad in
burqas in place of Jesus Christ and his twelve disciples. By reading this work along with his
earlier rendering of the ‘Last Supper’, in which the original characters are replaced by Kathakali
actors of Kerala within a metropolitan background, one can assume that here as well what
interests the artist are the fluidity of identities in the globalised world and the laissez faire
economy of cultural differences.
8/9/2019 The Oriental Atlantis: Critical Notes on India's First Biennale
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-oriental-atlantis-critical-notes-on-indias-first-biennale 12/23
12
If not advocating the ideology of multiculturalism, which was the case in Vilasini’s earlier
works, ‘Last Supper-Gaza’ seems to preach a different dogma which is far more overarching and
sublimated: the value of cosmopolitan morality. For example, the ‘lot notes’ published in
Christies’ auction-site says that ‘Last Supper Gaza’ “brings forth contemporary global concerns
on the issues of faith and betrayal.”xii
In every interpretation of the artwork, two things come to
the fore: its moralistic content with global outreach and its strong eschatological reference, in
other words, foundation of a privileged communion and redefinition of human history as a story
of redemption. ‘The Last Supper Gaza’, at least in its auction-house versions, is a token image
for global humanitarian discourse to protect fragile international laws, in order to guarantee the
coming kingdom of cosmopolitan rule where man’s natural disposition for a sinful life is
promised to be redeemed by founding a new communion. This story of redemption, however, is
just a story of displacement where the ‘natural laws’ of capital and social inequalities will be
displaced and sublimated as ‘natural flaws’ of human beings which will be redeemed when the
narrative of history is suspended by ‘divine’ intrusion. In this sense, Vilasini’s two versions of
the Last Supper theme, one as redemptive and other as laissez-faire, can be read in their ultimate
complementarity made possible by the artist’s displacement technique for sublimating the
explicit apolitical aesthetics of his earlier works.
SURGES OF GLOBALISATION AND A DROWNING PAINTER
‘Thoombinkal Chathan’, Oil on Canvas, by Reji K P, Kochi Muziris Biennale, 2013
8/9/2019 The Oriental Atlantis: Critical Notes on India's First Biennale
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-oriental-atlantis-critical-notes-on-indias-first-biennale 13/23
13
In the context of India’s liberal democracy, Dalits have a unique role to play by keeping the
state in check. But when the neoliberal state’s liberal policies have given way to transnational-
NGO activism, many Dalit spokespersons have succumbed to the lure of global capitalism for
immediate tactical gains by diluting larger strategic principles. K P Regi’s painting represents
such a problematic tendency of Dalit politics. The painting in question is named after a local
Dalit legendary character ‘Thoombinkal Chathan’, and the description displayed along with the
painting goes like this: “According to most versions of the legend [of Chathan], he has managed
to protect the land by sacrificing his own life [by being a human-bund to protect the paddy field
from flood]. In a broader sense, this narrative symbolises the Dalit community’s deep rooted
relationship with land and ecology, even though most often they are deprived of any form of
ownership to the land. The painting traces this local legend in order to initiate a discourse on our
contemporary time.”
In Reji’s painting, it is the peacefully reclining figure of the artist that we recognise as the
modern avatar of Thoombinkal Chathan. The representational space is divided into two by the
naked body of the artist. On the one hand, there is a placid and lively space of local cohabitation
filled with the memories of a communist culture, pitched against the background of a mammoth
naval ship (arriving from the distant horizon as if it were a symbol of global power). It is from
this dominating space of local-global conflict that the Dalit body of the artist seems to be
protecting a narrow area of farmland at the bottom of the painting.
Whatever inferences the viewer can deduce from the painting, the artist clearly states one
thing through the allegory of Thoombingal Chathan. Like the legendary hero, the painter wants
to prove his loyalty to his vocation. Reji K. P is one of the few artists in India who manages to
hold the poetry of art along with the politics of self. But when the tides of global art come, he
seems to be anxiously defensive about his painted life-world upon which, as the allegory of
Chathan suggests, the artist does not have any claim (perhaps due to the increasingly alienating
power of the existing gallery-system and art market).
The success of Reji’s painting is that it confidently engages with the issues of the unwritten
histories of subaltern life and the disappearance of local habitats. But along with the dead
‘mediatic-realist’ language of the painting, he seems to be paying a huge price for his artistic
8/9/2019 The Oriental Atlantis: Critical Notes on India's First Biennale
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-oriental-atlantis-critical-notes-on-indias-first-biennale 14/23
14
merits.xiii
The painting is said to be a depiction of a Dalit’s self-sacrifice for what he loves. But in
a land where dissenting Dalits have been buried alive to be human-bunds in paddy fields, the
legend of Thoombinkal Chathan and his ‘uncompromising love’ for the land can only be read as
a dubious construct. And when someone speaks on behalf of the Dalits and narrates the above
mentioned ‘tragic story’ without showing any critical engagement or irony, what else can we say
other than that the history of Dalit atrocities is repeated here as a mere farce? The self-sacrifice
of K. P Reji can be read as a gesture of love (for art or land), but in its discursive entirety, this
mindless performance can only be seen as a mockery of Dalit politics in a globalising world.
RESISTANCE AS EVENT AND NON-EVENT
‘The Sovereign Forest’, Multimedia Installation by Amar Kanwar, Kochi Muziris Biennale, 2013
The installation created by the Delhi based documentary film maker, Amar Kanwar becomes
an intriguing case study for anyone who is interested in the intersection of art and politics.
Researching extensively the popular uprising in the Orissa tribal village, Kalinganager, against
land grabbing and forced displacement since 1999, Kanwar’s ‘The Sovereign Forest’ provides a
unique and highly unsettling aesthetic experience. Instead of narrating any dramatic story of
heroic adventurism, Kanwar carefully employs two different narrative strategies that are
complementary to each other. On the one hand, there is an objective account of incidents, participants and victims through reproductions of photographic evidence, including voter’s IDs
and newspaper reportage. On the other hand, there are poetically charged narratives of nameless
characters and their emotional and existential pursuits, presented through video projections and
illustrated story books. The viewer is expected to freely associate both these complementary
8/9/2019 The Oriental Atlantis: Critical Notes on India's First Biennale
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-oriental-atlantis-critical-notes-on-indias-first-biennale 15/23
15
forms of narratives that are carefully lighted up within the gloomy darkness of the exhibition
space. Accompanying these artifacts Kanwar also inserts a film here, known as ‘The Scene of
Crime’, earlier exhibited in Documenta (13), which offers an experience of a landscape just prior
to erasure as territories marked for acquisition by industries and government. According to the
artist; “Every location, every blade of grass, every water source, every tree that is seen in the film
is now meant to not exist anymore. ‘The Scene of Crime’ is an experience of ‘looking’ at the
terrain of this conflict and the personal lives that exist within this natural landscape.”xiv
The high emotional density of the installation is a result of the carefully orchestrated play of
sound and visuals. In addition, level of immediacy between the subjects of narration and the
viewer in the dark is made possible by the fabricated absence of the artist’s agency within the
installation’s textuality. It is the experience of immediacy and cumulative emotional impact that
work as both the limitation and success of the installation. Kanwar’s archive of repressed voices
and erased memories creates a sense of internal coherence and unity; his installation attains its
emotional density by being absorbed in its own internal reality, to which the viewer has no other
role than to witness the singularity of the narrated event—the suffering and struggle of
Kalinganagar villagers. By carefully avoiding any suggestion of theatricality, which generally
take place by making the authorial agency discursively present, Kanwar ‘presents’ himself in his
films as a witness analogical to the indifferent eye of the camera.
The problem with Kanwar’s installation is neither his ‘indifference’ to the narrated event nor
his passive act of witnessing, but the carefully erased agency of the witness (artist/viewer) for the
sake of a universally valid emotionality. This is the very logic of cosmopolitan humanitarianism.
Under the guise of evoking global sympathy for the downtrodden masses, cosmopolitan
humanitarianism abstracts its practitioners’ concrete identities and universalises them as agents
of a shared morality. Through this strategy, the basic requirement of capital and third world neo-
liberalism is fulfilled; to conceal their feeble micro-politics which can be challenged from the
particularities of human life as they have been historically and provisionally articulated in the
forms of third world nationalities and post-colonial citizenships (Brennan 2001:93). Here, the
struggles of Kalinganagar localites against the forces of neo-colonialism can only be supported
by the ‘cosmopolitanised’ viewer/artist by resorting to some global human rights discourse
8/9/2019 The Oriental Atlantis: Critical Notes on India's First Biennale
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-oriental-atlantis-critical-notes-on-indias-first-biennale 16/23
16
which in history, has always been in the hands of oligarchic-capitalist powers, especially when it
comes to representing third world subjects (Amin 2011:129-145; Chandler 2002:115-135; Cheah
2006).
It is because of this mistaken and therefore futile political strategy that there is a self-defeating
irony in Kanwar’s installation. The major partners and funders of KMB in which Kanwar’s
artwork is exhibited and the main culprits of Kalinganagar tragedy are the same: TATA group
and Jindal Steel and Power Ltd. Though this can be regarded as an accident, one can map a
larger discursive framework to which Kanwar’s installation is affiliated. His testimonial
installation in particular and many of the artworks exhibited in KMB in general, displace the
violence of capital from the immediate reality of the third world citizen-subject into distant,
perhaps even exotic domains which are approachable only by the viewers’ sympathetic and
charitable feelings. The impossibility of imagining otherwise becomes visible only when we ask
the question: what if we do invite these distant domains of resistance and struggle to our own
immediate life-world, in order to initiate spaces of dialogue and ideological exchange? This was
exactly the underlying conceptual thrust and purpose of Jonas Staal’s project titled as ‘New
World Summit’.
‘New World Summit’ by Jonas Staal, Kochi Muziris Biennale, 2013
8/9/2019 The Oriental Atlantis: Critical Notes on India's First Biennale
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-oriental-atlantis-critical-notes-on-indias-first-biennale 17/23
17
Staal’s artwork drastically differs from that of other non-Indian artists whose works in general
show mere visual gimmicks that are often backed by some exoticised understanding of regional
culture – for example, the works of Alfredo Jarr and Ernesto Neto.xv
Staal planned a summit of
outlawed, so called ‘terrorist’ organisations from all over the world, twenty four Indian and
twenty one from abroad, on the theme of ‘history according to resistance movements’. At the
Biennale site, he built a dais surrounded by billboards depicting flags of invited organisations
including that of Indian Maoist groups and Students Islamic Movement of India (SIMI). As a
result, a case under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act was registered against the Biennale
organisers by the Kerala police, though Staal argued that his endeavor was “legal” enough.
Consequently, many of the billboards had to be covered by black paint according to the police
instruction.
Staal’s venture is part of his larger project with the slogan of ‘Art in Defense of Democracy’.
The driving force behind this project is his belief in ‘fundamental democracy’, a term by which
he means “a form that effectively makes the democratic instruments available for the people as a
whole. This is where art can demonstrate its power, namely: its imagination.” (Staal 2012)
Elsewhere in the same write-up he explains,
I believe in democracy as a universal movement [that] fights for a non-exclusive
political space where every voice can make itself heard, seen and felt, without a
‘state of exception’. As an artist I want to create the conditions for this politicalspace. I do not want to create art within a so-called democracy; I want to help
shape democracy myself. And as it has become apparent globally, I am far from
alone therein. (ibid)
Keeping this ambitious vision of Staal in mind, it should be noted that it is the ‘failure’ of his
project to realise its utopian imaginations that eventually becomes its success because through
the artwork’s incompleteness, we are able to negotiate with the limits of our own freedom. In
experimenting with the existing artworld’s democratic and cosmopolitan claims by pushing its
discursive conditions to the limits, Staal’s work becomes a blind spot within the spectacle of theBiennale. Though many of the flags displayed in the installation-site were covered by the
organisers themselves, there was no description which informs the viewer about the unfortunate
fate of the artwork. Moreover, there were no proper representatives from the invited
organisations because of the travel-ban imposed upon them reinforced by the state’s paranoid
8/9/2019 The Oriental Atlantis: Critical Notes on India's First Biennale
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-oriental-atlantis-critical-notes-on-indias-first-biennale 18/23
18
precautions, despite our belonging to a ‘cosmopolitan’ world of unhindered mobility and
exchange.
In the ideological plane, the reasons behind the failure of ‘New World Summit’ can be seen as
a result of sharing the leftist legacy of internationalism within the discursive space of
cosmopolitanism which has been historically and ideologically shaped by displacing the former.
The irreconcilable contradiction between both the ideologies has been firmly captured by
Timothy Brennan as follows,
If cosmopolitanism springs from a comfortable culture of middle-class travellers,
intellectuals and businessmen, internationalism—although based no less on therealities of global interpenetration and homogenization, mass migration and mass
culture, under the dominance of capital—is an ideology of the domestically
restricted, the recently relocated, the provisionally exiled and temporarily weak. Itis addressed to those who have an interest in transnational forms of solidarity, but
whose capacities for doing so have not yet arrived. (Brennan 2001:77)
By evoking the still relevant legacy of internationalism and putting KMB’s cosmopolitanism at
task, the ‘New World Summit’ tells us that the conditions for a transnational solidarity in the
realm of political practice and democratic deliberation are yet to be met. For Staal, as I have
already mentioned, such a condition is also necessary for realising the power of creativity — that
is, imagination — in its proper form and function. Thereof what the staged failure of Staal’s
experiment with the existing institutions of democracy questions is not only the contemporaryideology of cosmopolitanism, but also the pretentious claims made by the contemporary artworld
on the basis of its inexplicable say on ‘creativity’ and ‘imagination’.
A comparison between the nature of artworks designed by Jonas Staal and Amar Kanwar
would be illuminative here. Contrary to Kanwar’s self-contained installation, Staal’s work is a
staged process which was interrupted by the state for its deliberate provocativeness. Whereas
Staal invites the banned Indian Maoist militants who also fight in backward states like Orissa, to
participate in his public art project, Amar Kanwar’s installation claims to represent the
unrepresentable destiny of Orissan tribals without further problematising the available
institutions of representation both in the artworld and the bourgeois democratic state. When
Kanwar abstracts himself and the viewer as mere witnesses to the exotic ‘singularity of the evil’
8/9/2019 The Oriental Atlantis: Critical Notes on India's First Biennale
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-oriental-atlantis-critical-notes-on-indias-first-biennale 19/23
19
(by a strategic use of the exhibition space’s gloomy darkness contrary to the aesthetic of Staal’s
outdoor art work), the latter evokes a counter-discourse in which the completion of the work of
art becomes part of our collective responsibility as citizens of the state and inheritors of an
ostensibly democratic ethos. It is the non-happening of the event / summit that makes Staal’s
work striking and disturbing contrary to the ‘eventfulness’ of Kanwar’s artwork. The ‘non-event’
of the New World Summit leaves the viewer staring at the void represented by blackened flags,
while compelling him/her to look more closely through the dark symbols of the present to find
the remaining spaces of dissent and struggle.
The superficiality in comprehending local histories is a common feature of the artworks
exhibited in the Biennale and in a sense this is unavoidable because, for foreign artists like Jarr
and Neto, Kerala can only be a distant land of cosmopolitan hospitality to which they have to be
grateful. And for the Indian artists like Sundaram and Vilasini, the representations of local
history can only be less disturbing and more consensual to the regional authorities of power
without whom the task of accomplishing India’s first Biennale is impossible. Hence, what
KMB’s organisers need is a theoretical justification for this inevitable superficiality of the
artworks, and it is through the ideology of cosmopolitanism that they attempt to meet this
challenge. The very success of Jonas Staal’s lies in inverting this unavoidable superficial quality
of his artwork to reveal the deep-rooted crisis in India’s art and democracy as they are valorised
by KMB’s transnational cosmopolitan rhetoric.
The few artworks discussed here represent for me the best examples of KMB’s problematic
aesthetic. Though there are minor cases of exception to the troublesome aesthetics propagated by
KMB, for example the interesting works of some Burmese artists, in the final analysis they
ultimately succumb to its sweeping narrative of cultural cosmopolitanism due to their trouble-
free distance from the Biennale’s internal contradictions as well as their relative absence in
KMB’s media stunts.
In the conclusion to this article, I would argue that KMB’s rhetoric of cosmopolitanism may
have created an uproar in the Indian art scene and Kerala’s cultural and political discourse, but
this is by dismissing the criticality of art and importance of democratic institutions in the
country. In this article, I have consciously shifted the focus away from the key controversial
8/9/2019 The Oriental Atlantis: Critical Notes on India's First Biennale
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-oriental-atlantis-critical-notes-on-indias-first-biennale 20/23
20
issues linked to the curatorial administration of the Biennale to something more specific to art
and spectatorial experience. What this writing in essence has tried to uphold is the importance of
dissent and radical egalitarianism in extending our collective histories of struggle that necessarily
have to start from the very dialogical and dialectical relationships between the artist and the
viewer. Kochi Muziris Biennale’s paternalist rhetoric of cosmopolitanism is not designed to
grapple with this basic principle of art and democracy.
References
Amin, Samir (2011): ‘Humanitarianism or the Internationalism of the Peoples?’ in Endingthe Crisis of Capitalism or Ending Capitalism? (Pambazuka Press)
Brennan, Timothy (2001): ‘Cosmopolitanism and Internationalism’, New Left Review No. 7,Jan-Feb, pp. 75-84.
Bürger, Peter (1984): Theory of the Avant-Garde (USA: University of Minnesota Press)
Chandler, David (2002): “The Limits of Human Rights and Cosmopolitan Citizenship” in
David Chandler (ed) Rethinking Human Rights: Critical Approaches to International Politics (Palgrave Macmillan)
Cheah, Pheng (2006): Inhuman Conditions: On Cosmopolitanism and Human Rights (USA:
Harvard Unversity Press).
Engels, Friedrich (1845): The Festivals of Nations in London,
(www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1845/12/01.html). Viewed on 27 March 2013
Staal, Jonas (2012): Art in Defense of Democracy, (NRC Handelsblad/Cultural Supplement)
i ‘Does Biennale Have People on its Canvases?’, The Hindu, Thiruvananthapuram, 12
November 2012; ‘Finance Dept: Seeks Blacklisting of Biennale Foundation’, The New Indian Express, Thiruvananthapuram, 10 November 2012; ‘Biennale Funding: HC Seeks
Govt’s View on Vigilance Probe,’ The New Indian Express, Thiruvananthapuram, 8 January
2013; ‘Skeleton of Biennale Tumbles Out of Cupboard’ by Chandran T. V, The Baroda Pamphlet, No2, November-December, 2012.
ii For a critical introduction to the contemporary and global phenomenon of biennale culture,
see Art Incorporated: The Story of Contemporary Art by J. Stallabrass, Oxford University
Press, New York, 2004. To understand how the biennale has, despite its decolonising and
8/9/2019 The Oriental Atlantis: Critical Notes on India's First Biennale
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-oriental-atlantis-critical-notes-on-indias-first-biennale 21/23
21
democratic claims as one can see in the much celebrated Documenta 11, still proved toembody the traditional power structures of western / global artworld, see, ‘Biennials without
Borders?’ by Chin-Tao Wu, New Left Review, No. 57 , May-June, 2009.
iii Since most of the artworks exhibited in Kochi Muziris Biennale were installations and
digital reproductions (the very forms of artworks which claim to exist outside the art-market),
an analysis of their unacknowledged market-behavior is impossible unless and until weacquire a larger picture of artworld politics and its market strategies that are shaped by the
transnational capital. Keeping the critical awareness of market economy in the analytical
horizon, we should engage with the following question: How is it possible to form a critique of contemporary art as it is showcased in KMB by focusing on its ‘relatively autonomous’
epistemic and experiential parameters? Though the autonomy of art practices from existing
institutional and economic pressures is an illusory image created by the advocates of artworld
liberalism, it is impossible to discredit this idea without immediately falling into some sort ofsociological or economic determinism. Hence I find it is necessary to follow a methodology
in which the critique takes departure from the very ‘autonomy’ that the artwork claims from
all forms of social and political constraints (a claim used by KMB’s organisers to freethemselves from all forms of accountability and institutional procedures). This article is a
preliminary attempt along these lines. .
iv From: http://kochimuzirisBiennale.org/concept/ Accessed on 2 March 2013.
v While it could be argued that the principal difference Kerala has with other Indian states
(especially Maharashtra, Delhi and Gujarat in which the contemporary Indian artworld is
largely located) is the relative marginality of communal parties like Bharatiya Janata Party
(BJP) or the right wing organisations like Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), this featurecannot be taken as an instance of Kerala’s secular culture. In Kerala, the political arena is
highly determined by Christian, Muslim and Nair groups, while in the social domain, theHindu communal associations like BJP, RSS and Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) also play
an increasingly major role. Recently, their role in influencing the State policies has beenwell evident in 2008 when the Communist government in Kerala tried to radically secularise
the school text books. It precipitated furious reaction and the government had to give up this
plan. Likewise, the non-egalitarian character of Kerala was exemplified by the fate of therecent pro-Dalit movie Papilio Buddha (2013) which became controversial for its explicit
rejection of the ideologies of Hinduism, Communism and Gandhism. The Congress-led state
government, with the support of the opposition led by CPI and CPI (M), decided to ban themovie because the film makers disagreed with the Censor Board’s recommendation of over
forty cuts and several mutes and blurs. Even after long negotiation and legal fight they had
to succumb to most of the Censor Board’s proposals. Tellingly, KMB’s organisersmaintained a safe distance from the public debates around Papilio Buddha, despite their
self-appointed claim to be Kerala’s new cultural vanguards.
vi Regarding the presence of Buddhist culture in and around Muziris and the brahmanization
of Kerala history see, ‘Buddhaprathimakale ippozhum Bhayakkunnathaarokke?’ (‘Who are
Still Afraid of Buddha statues?’) by Aju K. Narayanan and Ajay Sekhar, Mathrubhumi
8/9/2019 The Oriental Atlantis: Critical Notes on India's First Biennale
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-oriental-atlantis-critical-notes-on-indias-first-biennale 22/23
22
Weekely, December 2-8, 2012. Also see, ‘Buddhism in Kerala’ by P. C. Alexander,Annamalai University, 1949.
vii Mullaperiyar dam, located in Kerala, was constructed in 1895 by the British rulers in the
erstwhile Madras Presidency. In 2009, IIT Roorkee submitted a report to the Kerala
government about the dam’s structural instability. According to the report, an earthquake
measuring 6.5 on the Richter scale could result in the collapse of the dam any time andaround thirty lakh people could be killed by water and flood. This report frightened the
already panic-stricken masses that had experienced of the 2004 tsunami which inflicted
colossal damages.
viii In this sense, what I put forward here is a critique of KMB’s cosmopolitan aesthetics and
ideology that as a methodological principle, necessitates certain theoretical abstraction(especially when it comes to the question of spectatorship and citizenship) and therefore, a
selective case study of the exhibits based on their respective discursive capacity to
identify/dis-identify with the curatorial logic of KMB.
ix ‘Involve People in Organising Art Events, Says Atul Dodiya’ by S. Anandan. The Hindu,
Kochi, 5 September 2012
x kochimuzirisbiennale.org/artist-in-laboratory/ (Accessed on 9 March 2013)
xi Along with his anti-KMB press releases, blog posts and participation in public meetings
organised by local artists and cultural enthusiasts, Johny M.L curated the ‘United Art Fair’
(UAF) in New Delhi, 2012, while the preparations for KMB were on. By showcasing
around five hundred ‘new’ artists who were less visible in the leading art circles side by side
the ‘affordable’ works of few established artists (who were not included in KMB), Johny ML tried to forge a new alliance in the Indian artworld to compete the monopolised market
economy. Since the discussions around this initiative was almost eclipsed by KMB’scontroversies and its fabricated success, it remains to be seen how the organisers of UAFwill regain their visibility and redefine the politics of the Indian art scene, even though their
curatorial initiative seems unpromising in engaging with the larger issues of inherent elitism
and market-driven politics of the contemporary Indian art. In the final analysis, they appeal
to be capitulating to what they claim to be rejecting.
xii www.christies.com/lotfinder/photographs/vivek-vilasini-last-supper-gaza-52158899-
details.aspx (Accessed on 9 March 2013). ‘Lot notes’ are used during art auctions by buyers
and auctioneers for immediate reference purposes regarding the artworks presented for sale.
xiii The term ‘new mediatic realism’ in the context of post-liberalisation Indian art was
popularised by the cultural theorist, Nancy Adjania, in order to legitimise the painterly style
of young artists like T. V Santhosh, Baiju Parthan, Riyas Komu (the co-organiser of KMB)and so on. Belonging to this generation of artists but unlike them, Reji K P is known for his
ability to forge intriguing subject-matters (often about migrant laborers and
underclass/lower-caste urban life) all the while following the stylistic features of the
‘mediatic realists’. ( For more on ‘new mediatic realism’, see Nancy Adjania, ‘The Mutable
8/9/2019 The Oriental Atlantis: Critical Notes on India's First Biennale
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-oriental-atlantis-critical-notes-on-indias-first-biennale 23/23
23
Aesthetic of New Mediatic Realism’, Art India Magazine, 2005, Volume X, Issue IV,Quarter IV)
xiv ‘Ways of Seeing and Thinking’ published in The Hindu, Orissa, 27 August, 2012. See,
http://www.thehindu.com/arts/ways-of-seeing-and-thinking/article3826861.ece (Accessed
on 10 April 2013)
xv Whereas Alfredo Jarr quoted certain verses from Kalidasa’s Mekhasandhesam in his
playful installation in order to illustrate his argument of the trans-regional experiences
imagined in ancient Indian culture, Ernesto Neto’s quasi-sculptural installation, withreferences to Hindu mythology and Kerala’s age-old spice trade, was designed to give an
intoxicating experience of color and smell.