the oregon-oxford debate

42

Upload: katrina-naval

Post on 28-Nov-2014

16.374 views

Category:

Education


0 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Oregon-Oxford Debate
Page 2: The Oregon-Oxford Debate

DEBATE•Formal type of argumentation

•Intelligent exchange of points between the affirmative and negative sides

Page 3: The Oregon-Oxford Debate

In debate

Proposition

Page 4: The Oregon-Oxford Debate

Proposition

Topic or issue that is argued

upon

Page 5: The Oregon-Oxford Debate

In exploring

Do some ORGANIZED research!

Utilize the library-it’s the first source

Do some interviewsTake down notes!Refer to the web

Page 6: The Oregon-Oxford Debate

introductiondiscussi

onconclusi

on

Parts of an argument

Page 7: The Oregon-Oxford Debate

To arouse the interest of the audience

To explain the proposition

To state the issues to be debated

To state the parameters of the debate

introduction

Page 8: The Oregon-Oxford Debate

You should arouse the attention of

your audience.

REMEMBER!

Page 9: The Oregon-Oxford Debate

Make them see that the

topic is important.

How?

Page 10: The Oregon-Oxford Debate

Show them that the topic

is timely.

How?

Page 11: The Oregon-Oxford Debate

Preserve a favorable attitude.

How?

Page 12: The Oregon-Oxford Debate

Second aim of intro is to

explain the proposition.

REMEMBER!

Page 13: The Oregon-Oxford Debate

Define all important words. (1st

A)

How?

Page 14: The Oregon-Oxford Debate

Set the parameters/ limit of the

debate (1st A)

How?

Page 15: The Oregon-Oxford Debate

The whole idea must be clearly explained.

How?

Page 16: The Oregon-Oxford Debate

Present a short but

lively history of the topic.

How?

Page 17: The Oregon-Oxford Debate

Third aim of intro is to state the ISSUES.

REMEMBER!

Page 18: The Oregon-Oxford Debate

ISSUES are the questions that

when answered, may destroy a side.

UNDERSTAND

Page 19: The Oregon-Oxford Debate

ISSUES are the questions that

when answered, may destroy a side.

UNDERSTAND

Page 20: The Oregon-Oxford Debate

TEST FOR ISSUESResolved that the K+12 be implemented in SPCIS. (PROPOSITION)

•How would the proposition affect

SPCIS? The students?

Page 21: The Oregon-Oxford Debate

TEST FOR ISSUESResolved that the K+12 be implemented in SPCIS. (PROPOSITION)

•Is there really a need to implement the

proposition?

Page 22: The Oregon-Oxford Debate

introductiondiscussi

onconclusi

on

Parts of an argument

Page 23: The Oregon-Oxford Debate

OPPOSING SIDES

Affirmative

Negative

Page 24: The Oregon-Oxford Debate

AFFIRMATIVEBurden of proofProve all aspects of the caseCannot win based on inability of the negative

Page 25: The Oregon-Oxford Debate

NEGATIVEBurden of rebuttalMust destroy either the necessity, beneficiality and practicability of (+)

Cannot discuss anything the affirmative didn’t discuss

Page 26: The Oregon-Oxford Debate

ASPECTS OF THE DEBATE(+)

NECESSITY

BENEFICIALITYPRACTICABILITY

Page 27: The Oregon-Oxford Debate

ASPECTS OF THE DEBATE(-)NON-NECESSITY

NON-BENEFICIALITY

NON-PRACTICABILITY

Page 28: The Oregon-Oxford Debate

NECESSITYNeed for the propositionDiscusses the presence/absence of an inherent flaw in the status quo

Page 29: The Oregon-Oxford Debate

BENEFICIALITYDiscusses the advantages or disadvantages of adopting or rejecting the resolution

Page 30: The Oregon-Oxford Debate

PRACTICABILITYfeasibility of a proposition

includes matter of:*law   *clamor *finance

Page 31: The Oregon-Oxford Debate

PARTS OF THE DEBATE(+)Constructive speechInterpellation

Rebuttal

Page 32: The Oregon-Oxford Debate

Constructive speechpresentation of each

team member’s arguments and

evidence for each aspect of the case

Page 33: The Oregon-Oxford Debate

InterpellationThe opportunity for

the opposing debater to ask

questions regarding the speech of the

speaker

Page 34: The Oregon-Oxford Debate

RebuttalThe summary and

defense of each team’s arguments and

evidence, to be delivered by the team

captain

Page 35: The Oregon-Oxford Debate

Speaker roles1A speaker-NECESSITY1N speaker-NON NECESSITY

Page 36: The Oregon-Oxford Debate

Speaker roles2A speaker-BENEFICIALITY2N speaker-NON BENEFICIALITY

Page 37: The Oregon-Oxford Debate

Speaker roles3A speaker-PRACTICABILITY3N speaker-NON PRACTICABILITY

Page 38: The Oregon-Oxford Debate

Outline of speech-1A

I. IntroductionII. State the proposition,and task of each memberA. Define the termsB. Give the status quo

Page 39: The Oregon-Oxford Debate

Outline of speech-1A

-what is the status quo?-what’s wrong with it?C. State your standIII. CaselineA. State all your argumentsfirst

Page 40: The Oregon-Oxford Debate

Outline of speech-1A

B. Go back, then strengthen each oneC. Always give transition.IV. Conclusion

Page 41: The Oregon-Oxford Debate

Outline of speech-1N

I. IntroductionII. State the proposition,Negate or show clash towards it.III. Rebut the 1st speakers’arguments

Page 42: The Oregon-Oxford Debate

Outline of speech-1N

IV. Caseline-same as thecomponents of caseline of 1Av. Conclusion