the oregon-oxford debate
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
DEBATE•Formal type of argumentation
•Intelligent exchange of points between the affirmative and negative sides
In debate
Proposition
Proposition
Topic or issue that is argued
upon
In exploring
Do some ORGANIZED research!
Utilize the library-it’s the first source
Do some interviewsTake down notes!Refer to the web
introductiondiscussi
onconclusi
on
Parts of an argument
To arouse the interest of the audience
To explain the proposition
To state the issues to be debated
To state the parameters of the debate
introduction
You should arouse the attention of
your audience.
REMEMBER!
Make them see that the
topic is important.
How?
Show them that the topic
is timely.
How?
Preserve a favorable attitude.
How?
Second aim of intro is to
explain the proposition.
REMEMBER!
Define all important words. (1st
A)
How?
Set the parameters/ limit of the
debate (1st A)
How?
The whole idea must be clearly explained.
How?
Present a short but
lively history of the topic.
How?
Third aim of intro is to state the ISSUES.
REMEMBER!
ISSUES are the questions that
when answered, may destroy a side.
UNDERSTAND
ISSUES are the questions that
when answered, may destroy a side.
UNDERSTAND
TEST FOR ISSUESResolved that the K+12 be implemented in SPCIS. (PROPOSITION)
•How would the proposition affect
SPCIS? The students?
TEST FOR ISSUESResolved that the K+12 be implemented in SPCIS. (PROPOSITION)
•Is there really a need to implement the
proposition?
introductiondiscussi
onconclusi
on
Parts of an argument
OPPOSING SIDES
Affirmative
Negative
AFFIRMATIVEBurden of proofProve all aspects of the caseCannot win based on inability of the negative
NEGATIVEBurden of rebuttalMust destroy either the necessity, beneficiality and practicability of (+)
Cannot discuss anything the affirmative didn’t discuss
ASPECTS OF THE DEBATE(+)
NECESSITY
BENEFICIALITYPRACTICABILITY
ASPECTS OF THE DEBATE(-)NON-NECESSITY
NON-BENEFICIALITY
NON-PRACTICABILITY
NECESSITYNeed for the propositionDiscusses the presence/absence of an inherent flaw in the status quo
BENEFICIALITYDiscusses the advantages or disadvantages of adopting or rejecting the resolution
PRACTICABILITYfeasibility of a proposition
includes matter of:*law *clamor *finance
PARTS OF THE DEBATE(+)Constructive speechInterpellation
Rebuttal
Constructive speechpresentation of each
team member’s arguments and
evidence for each aspect of the case
InterpellationThe opportunity for
the opposing debater to ask
questions regarding the speech of the
speaker
RebuttalThe summary and
defense of each team’s arguments and
evidence, to be delivered by the team
captain
Speaker roles1A speaker-NECESSITY1N speaker-NON NECESSITY
Speaker roles2A speaker-BENEFICIALITY2N speaker-NON BENEFICIALITY
Speaker roles3A speaker-PRACTICABILITY3N speaker-NON PRACTICABILITY
Outline of speech-1A
I. IntroductionII. State the proposition,and task of each memberA. Define the termsB. Give the status quo
Outline of speech-1A
-what is the status quo?-what’s wrong with it?C. State your standIII. CaselineA. State all your argumentsfirst
Outline of speech-1A
B. Go back, then strengthen each oneC. Always give transition.IV. Conclusion
Outline of speech-1N
I. IntroductionII. State the proposition,Negate or show clash towards it.III. Rebut the 1st speakers’arguments
Outline of speech-1N
IV. Caseline-same as thecomponents of caseline of 1Av. Conclusion