the office of student conduct: an overview graduate student orientation fall 2015 adam jussel,...
TRANSCRIPT
THE OFFICE OF STUDENT CONDUCT: AN OVERVIEW
Graduate Student Orientation
Fall 2015
Adam Jussel, Director OSC
Learning Outcomes
• We hope that at the end of the day you. . .• Understand OSC’s mission and purpose• Understand the conduct process• Understand your role and obligations• Understand how to handle Academic Integrity (AI)
violations
OSC Mission
The Office of Student Conduct upholds the WSU Standards of Conduct for Students in a fair and equitable manner. We seek to involve students in the conduct process, recognizing their rights and responsibilities, and fostering self-determination and transformational engagement.
Goals of the Conduct System
• Educate the student or students• Deter future misconduct• Assist the student(s) involved• Protect the community
Purposes of Standards of Conduct
“Code of Conduct”
• Sets out conditions governing students’ eligibility to remain part of WSU
community• Defines what our living/learning
environment is• Serves as a protection to that community
Standards of Conduct for Students
Acts of Dishonesty Disruption or obstruction Disorderly conduct Abuse of others Theft or damage to property Hazing Failure to comply w/ officials Violations of policy, rule or law Alcohol and drugs Weapons
Unauthorized use of devices Computer abuse or theft Discrimination and Harassment Sexual harassment and
misconduct Stalking Reckless endangerment Trespassing Retaliation
Jurisdiction of WSU Standards of Conduct
• All on-campus conduct
• University sponsored activities
• Off-campus conduct that adversely affects university community/pursuit of its objectives.
• From application awarding of degree
• Applies to all students • full-time, part-time, grad, undergrad, professionals, those who
aren’t “enrolled” but have continuing relationship with WSU or have been notified of admission
Criminal System vs Conduct System
Criminal
• Punitive• The court can compel you
to appear• Have the right to legal
representation• “Beyond a reasonable
doubt”• Possible consequences
include prison or even death
Conduct
• Educational• Student can choose to not
participate in the process• The student must
represent themselves• “More likely than not”• Possible consequences
range from a warning to expulsion
Walk-in and Telephone Reports
Office of Student Conduct ProcessesConduct Resolution
Notice to AppearContest a Violation (within 14 days)
Investigative MeetingConduct Officer Hearing
DecisionSanctions
Appeals Board Decisionwithin 20 days after appeal submitted
How Cases Enter and Flow through the Conduct Process
Online Form SubmissionsMisconduct
Sexual AssaultHazing
(to Director for routing)
OEO Investigative
Memorandum(to Director)
Presidential Reviewwithin 10 days after
Decision of Expulsion or Loss of Recognition
optional
Police Interagency
Meetings/Police Reports
(to Conduct Officers)
Residence Life Incident Reports
May appeal within 21 days after decision
Source of Reports
Conduct Board ProcessNotice to Appear
Conduct Board DecisionSanctions
Director may refer to Conduct Board
Faculty Online Reports
Academic Integrity
May Petition to Delay
within 10 days after Decision
Notice to AppearConduct Board Hearing
Administrative Hearing
with Conduct Officer
Notice of Decision and Sanctionswithin 10 days after hearing
Appeal of Decisionor Sanctionswithin 21 days
Appeals Board Decision
within 20 days after appeal submitted
Conduct Board Hearing
Conduct Code Violation
Notice to Appear Administrative
Hearing
Conduct ResolutionDecision and
Sanctions
Student mayContest Charges
within 14 days after notice
with reasonable notice
Dismiss Case
In Cases of Expulsion or Loss of Recognition
President’s Review
within 10 days after Decision
Petition to Delay
within 10 days after Decision
optional
optional
Alcohol & Drug Policy• Found at: https://conduct.wsu.edu/policies/• Medical marijuana use on campus
Other Important Policies to Know
• Downloading or Sharing Files/Software• Good Samaritan Guideline
• EP 15
Mandated Reporting• An employee of Washington State University must report
any disclosures or suspicions of:• Sexual assault, stalking, or violence (emotional or physical)
perpetrated because of someone’s gender or relationship status• All allegations of discrimination or harassment (protected classes)• Abuse of a child or vulnerable adult• Imminent harm to self or others• Hazing
• 48 hours is the standard time frame in which to report.• Who to report to?
• Supervisor or head of department/unit can help you contact:• Police, CPS, or APS• OEO• OSC• DOS
More About Mandated Reporting
• You are not responsible for investigating the disclosures or verifying their validity
• When in doubt, report
In cases of immediate imminent danger call 911!
Student Conduct
Goals• Educate• Deter• Assist• Protect
Jurisdiction• Students who have a
continuing relationship
w/ WSU• Both on and off campus
Purpose and process• Educational not punitive• Different processes than
criminal system• Different standards of evidence• Different consequences
Important policies• Drugs and alcohol• Medical marijuana• EP 15• Mandated reporting
Academic Integrity
In Academic Integrity cases, the instructor acts as the Conduct Officer, so it’s important that you understand
the definitions, policies, and processes.
Scope of the Issue
• July 1, 2014 to July 1, 2015
• Academic Dishonesty- Cheating 88• Academic Dishonesty- Plagiarism 82
• Total 170 • (That’s about 5 new cases each week of class!)
• Of those. . . • Charges Dropped 1• Not Responsible 9
• Pending/Unknown 7• Responsible 153
Definitions of Academic Integrity Violations
(WAC 504-26-010)• Unauthorized assistance• Unauthorized sources• Unauthorized materials• Fabrication• Unfair advantage• Scientific misconduct
• Unauthorized collaboration• Unauthorized knowledge• Plagiarism• Unauthorized multiple
submissions• Sabotage• Falsifying records
Most Common AI ViolationsUnauthorized Assistance
Use of unauthorized materials in taking quizzes, tests, or examinations, OR giving or receiving unauthorized assistance by any means, including:
• talking during quizzes, tests or exams• copying information from another student• using electronic devices or • taking an examination for another student
Fabrication
The intentional invention or counterfeiting of information in the course of an academic activity.
The most common form is counterfeiting a record of internship or practicum experiences.
(by far): Plagiarism
Presenting the information, ideas, or phrasing of another person as the student’s own work without proper acknowledgement of the source.
• WSU’s policy makes no distinction between intentional and unintentional plagiarism, which means that:
• One improper citation IS plagiarism.• This also includes submitting work created by someone else as your own,
including purchasing papers online.
Initial Hearing/ Determination with Instructor
AI Hearing Board Decision and
Sanctionswithin 10 days after hearing
Referral to Conduct Boardin cases of 2nd offenseor egregious offenses
Academic Integrity Violation
Appeal of Instructor’s Decision or Sanctionswithin 21 days
Additional Educational Sanctions Assigned by Conduct Officer or Referral to Conduct Board
Academic Integrity Appeal Hearing
If instructor finds student responsible, a report to
OSC is submitted online.
Conduct Officer Action
21 days after instructor’s decision (if no appeal)
or immediately following AI Hearing Board’s decision (if found Responsible):
What happens if there is an alleged
violation?When an academic integrity violation has occurred, the instructor:• Compiles evidence supporting claim• Meets with student about issue• Makes determination if violation occurred and imposes
academic sanctions if appropriate• Reports incident and decision to Office of Student Conduct
• Then:
• Student can accept instructor’s decision OR student has 21 days to appeal decision
• If student appeals, AI Board makes independent decision based on the information provided by the student and the instructor.
First Steps• Assemble the
Evidence:• Offending work• Statements by
witnesses• Original sources if
plagiarism• “Preponderance of the
evidence”
• Notification• Private• As quickly as possible• Provide date, time and
place for face-to-face meeting
• Communicate concerns through e-mail or phone
…and then• Meeting
• Show evidence to student
• Allow him or her to respond
• Notify student that you are required to report to OSC
• Notify student you will provide them with outcome and summary of meeting, academic sanction, and appeal information
Two parts of the AI process
• Academic sanction from the instructor
• University sanction from OSC
The academic sanction must be in line with syllabus statement
Outcome
Outcome of meeting• Provide student with written
statement (e-mail is ok)
• Outlining evidence
• Summarize meeting
• Sanction
• 21 day appeal period
Notify OSC
• Complete online form
• Email • copy of offending work • any original sources of
plagiarism • a copy of any written
communication with student regarding the plagiarism
• copy of syllabus
AI Appeal ProcessAcademic Integrity Hearing Board
• Teaching faculty and a chairperson• Recommended by Faculty Senate
Function of Board• Separate and independent determination of responsibility• Determine whether sanction is appropriate and in accordance
with syllabus statement
Timing• 21 days from date of your letter
Hearing• Letter will go to student and instructor indicating time of hearing,
instruction of witnesses, evidence, etc. . .
Syllabus Statements
• Articulate the standards that you are willing to enforce
• Allow students to understand the consequences of dishonesty
• Clarify academic and behavioral standards in advance
Academic Integrity
• Instructor Responsibilities• Compile evidence• Meet with student• Determine responsibility
and impose academic sanctions
• Report to OSC• On-line reporting form• www.conduct.wsu.edu
• Two Part Process• Academic sanction
• Imposed by the instructor
• Spelled out in the syllabus
• University sanction• Imposed by OSC • Educational sanctions
Questions?
academicintegrity.wsu.edu