the next wave of tv measurementlp.accessintel.com/rs/881-ztt-725/images/the next wave of...tv hhs...
TRANSCRIPT
Jane Clarke | CEO, Managing Director
The Next Wave of TV Measurement
CIMM MISSION
Now affiliate of ARF; still R&D coalition of cross-platform video ecosystem to innovate in:• Bringing more granular RPD data to TV for
planning, buying & attribution measurement• New methods to measure and compare
cross-platform TV/Video audiences• Designing future data platforms for
cross-platform premium video2
CIMM MEMBERS
3
4
1. Rise of Granular Viewing Data and TV Attribution
2. Growth of Addressable TV
TWO TV MEASUREMENT TRENDS
5
Download the Digital Reportwww.cimm-us.org
the science of allocating credit to exposures for driving sales or other outcomes.
the most scintillating, complicated and elusive topic in the television industry.
1.
2.
ATTRIBUTION
Household or device-level measure of ROI and tool for tactical optimization of media elements• Requires STB or SmartTV data matched to households or devices
Market-level measure of ROI and tool for strategic allocation of marketing and media elements • Requires media GRPs or impressions at the DMA level (or lower)
Marketing Mix Models
Attribution
Two Fundamentally Different ROI Measurements
7 Key Areas In TV Attribution
3. Can the modeler measure the outcome variable and business objectives you want?
Sales, Traffic, Brand Attitudes or TV Tune-In
1. Does the overall model approach fit your needs?Tactical Optimization or ROI?
2. What type of television is analyzed in the model?
Linear, DVR, VOD, Addressable, Premium TV and Short Video on Smart TVs or Mobile/Computer
8
7. Understand QC, privacy and validation processes
4. Does the TV data meet your needs? Accuracy, representativity, granularity … How much is measured, modeled or matched? How are data matched?
5. Are all the media and marketing elements in the model? Other media, other marketing and non-marketing drivers
6. What method determines attribution?Statistical models, algorithmic or experimental design?
7 Key Areas In TV Attribution
9
Industry Concerns and CIMM’s Next Steps
10
1. Don’t forget fundamentals of TV advertisingCreative MattersUpper-funnel Branding Benefit
2. Challenges in measuring and combining all forms of TV viewing: linear, time-shifted, VOD, OTT, AddressableDisentangle Data IssuesDevelop Best Practices
3. CIMM Next Step: Bring More Confidence to Data & MethodologyControlled study to unpack data inputs for same campaigns:
Different sources for Ad Airings (Ad Occurrence) data Different combinations of Smart TV and STB data for Ad Exposure
Perception vs. Reality in TV
Scale (HH’s)
Data Sources
Programmatic
Sold on ROI?
Reality
Linear TV Audience Based Buyingon Linear TV
Pay TV Video On Demand (VOD
with DAI)
Digital VideoOver The Top(OTT)
Full Addressable TV
Perception
Linear TV Full Addressable TV
75+M/<5% of TV ads119+M/100% of TV ads
Nielsen, comScore
No
93+M/@20% of TV ads
RPD, Nielsen, comScore, First & Third Party Data
Some
Data targeting automated; Insertion manual
40+M/<5% of TV ads
Nielsen, comScore, RPD
No
70+M/<5% TV ads
No
85+M/@20% TV ads
No
RPD, Nielsen, comScore, First & Third Party Data
Some
Nielsen, comScore,Cookies / DMPs
Nielsen, comScore,Cookies / DMP’s
No Yes MixedYes
No
Source: Simulmedia
© 2019 Cadent. All Rights Reserved. Confidential and Proprietary. | 12
1
3
2
4
Identify high-value households
leveraging first- & third-party datasets
Apply the same first-& third-party datasets to include additionalscreens and systems
Match the target set to determine the
qualified addressable TV HHs & deliver ads to only those homes,
at scale
Analyze the impact through closed-
loop measurement
Mobile, Tablet, Connected TV Screens
62%
Sales Lift Sales Lift
23%
17% 15%
7%
CIMM Workshop: How does Addressable Television work?
Addressable Television is valuable and scalable today!
75MILLION
ADDRESSABLE & OTTUS HOUSEHOLDS
§ Direct access to all addressable TV supply from all providers and video partners (connected TV, mobile, digital video extensions)
§ Platform technology unifies and standardizes campaigns.
§ Determines unduplicated reach, frequency and sales for a campaign, with the ability to bridge TV and digital
© 2019 Cadent. All Rights Reserved. Confidential and Proprietary. | 13
© 2019 Cadent. All Rights Reserved. Confidential and Proprietary. | 14
TYPES OF ADDRESSABLE TV
Linear / VOD
Dynamically deliver messages only to households in a brands true
segment
Enables full closed-loop measurement against
marketer KPIs
70m US HHs
Zone Targeting
Deliver targeted advertising to specific zip and cable zones that over-index for a certain audience
attribute.
Enables close-loop measurement via household level exposure data
210 DMAs, 2700 Zones
Index Targeting
Use data to target TV content that a specific audience segment is
most likely to view.
Uses STB or ACR functionality in Smart TVs to identify content.
93M US HHs
OTT / TV Everywhere
Reach lighter traditional TV viewers or cord cutters/nevers on
IP and mobile devices
Runs in premium episodic TV content streamed via apps.
500m US OTT Devices
Addressable TV: Multiple inventory formats, devices, and services
© 2019 Cadent. All Rights Reserved. Confidential and Proprietary. | 15
HHs in-market for:Luxury SUVs
Electric/Hybrid cars
AUTO
Automotive
DMV registration data
FIRST PARTY
Card membersCurrent/prospective
members
First-party client data via double blind match
SHOPPER
HHs purchasing:Dog food, Cat litter,
Craft beer, Soup, Decongestant meds
Loyalty card (store) data and credit/debit data
SET TOP BOX
Light/lapsed/heavy viewers of:
Specified programs or Networks
Set top box ACR data
PROPENSITY
(Demographics, psychographics,
behavioral)
Small business owners
Tech enthusiastsOrder flowers online
PHARMA
Allergy sufferersBirth control usersChronic migraine
sufferers
RX diagnosis data (HIPAA compliant)
Robust and diverse data ecosystems allow advertisers build rich profiles
Decile 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
% of Total ImpressionsAddressable Campaign*
Decile 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
% of Total ImpressionsNational Campaign
By implementing frequency capping and finding the target segment wherever they were watching, the Addressable campaign is able to deliver more even impression distribution against the target audience.
REACH HHS NOT EXPOSED IN NATIONAL CAMPAIGN
83% OF IMPS. GO TO ONLY 34% OF HHS
The Impact of Layering Addressable
*Addressable campaign for illustrative purposesReach derived from DTV set-top box data.
© 2019 Cadent. All Rights Reserved. Confidential and Proprietary. | 17
SALES LIFT Purchase metricsSales lift; total buy rate; share shift analysis; days to purchase; optimal frequency; incremental sales
WEB TRAFFICEngagement metricsLift in visitors, days, visited, total visits; visits by page pixeled; visits by frequency; days to first visit from exposure
BRAND HEALTHAwareness metricsAd awareness, ad preference, ad consideration; perception by demographic, by competitive purchasers
FOOT TRAFFICMeasure foot trafficLift in location visitation, by network, by daypart, by day of week; incremental visitation; total exposed visitation
Today, measurement is primarily a closed-loop analysis with media delivery reported inconsistently by inventory owners and/or third parties
CIMM Workshop: Key Issues in Addressable TV
1. Complexity with a Payoff: Operationally challenging nowSuccess has made it worthwhile
2. Emerging Addressable Tactics:Granular precision audience segmentationFrequency capping for heavy TV viewersReach extension for less frequent TV viewers
CIMM Workshop: Key Issues in Addressable TV
3. Addressable Expansion: National InventoryNew Arrangements with MVPDs (Ampersand)
DAI in Smart TVs
4. Major Challenges with Opening Up National Inventory• New business agreements with MVPDs/OEMS to deploy
• Need profitable addressable pricing models that address
unsold impressions not “in target”
• Standardization of consumer targets, data sources and ROI
measurement
• Separation of addressable measurement from national
C3/C7 ratings
© 2019 Cadent. All Rights Reserved. Confidential and Proprietary. | 20
• Example: Program “A” – Average National Cable Unit :30
Traditional Linear TV Economics
A18-49 Rating .14
A18-49 Impressions 180,000
A18-49 Net CPM $14.00
:30 Net Unit Value $2,520
Addressable Unit Economics
Target Addressable Segment (20% of :30 Linear Unit Imps)
36,000
Effective National Linear :30 CPM applied to Target Addressable Segment
$70.00
20% Discount Applied to National Linear :30 ECPM
$56.00
Unit Value of Addressable Impressions
$2,016
Linear Unit Economics
A18-49 Impressions 144,000
A18-49 Net CPM (at 25% discount for remaining Imp)
$10.50
:30 Unit Value of Remaining Linear Impressions
$1,512
New Total Unit Value: $352840% premium over linear-only sale
Tradition Linear-Only Sale Addressable + Linear Optimized Sale
The Math for a National Network
DAI in Smart TVs: Two ApproachesProject O.A.R Nielsen
Number of TV sets 12 million TVs (Vizio); in discussions with other OEMs* to launch an open standard
16.5 million homes from two manufacturers; in discussions with other OEMs
Launch timing December 2019 2019-20 – Integration, Development and Beta Testing2021 – Commercial introduction
Addressable insertion model SASO (creative versioning) SASOAddressable audience measurement reporting scope
National and local TV ad inventory
National and local TV ad inventory
Audience measurement and reporting principles
Emphasis: 3rd party verification; standardized identification through Ad-ID
Emphasis: tie back to Nielsen tenets: universe estimates, HH demographics, coverage, representation, computations
What’s Next?
1. MVPD Platforms: Xandr vs. Ampersand?2. Smart TVs: O.A.R. vs. Nielsen? 3. Standardization: Not only segment definitions,
but approaches to counting and validating impressions
4. Measurement: Industry agreement on methodology to separate addressable from non-addressable impressions.