the new view of fiscal policy and its application › sites › default › ... · the “old...
TRANSCRIPT
The New View of Fiscal Policy and Its ApplicationJason Furman
Chairman, Council of Economic Advisers
France StratégieParis, France
November 16, 2016
Table of Contents
1
1. Motivation
2. The “New View” of Fiscal Policy
3. Application to the United States and Europe
Table of Contents
2
1. Motivation
2. The “New View” of Fiscal Policy
3. Application to the United States and Europe
Substantial Slack Remains in Europe: Output
3Note: Population data for euro area are quarterly interpolations of annual data.Source: National sources via Haver Analytics; CEA ca lculations.
Euro Area
United States
France
2016:Q3
90
92
94
96
98
100
102
104
106
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Real GDP per Capita: Euro Area, United States, and FranceIndex (Pre-Crisis Peak = 100)
Substantial Slack Remains in Europe: Employment
4Source: National sources via Haver Analytics; CEA ca lculations.
Euro Area
United States
France
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016
Unemployment RatePercent
Oct-2016
Substantial Slack Remains in Europe: Inflation
5
Note: Data for euro area and France are for the Harmonized Index of Consumer Prices (HICP) excluding energy and unprocessed food. Data for United States are for the Consumer Price Index for Al l Urban Consumers (CPI-U) excluding food and energy.Source: National sources via Haver Analytics; CEA ca lculations.
Euro Area
France
United States
Sep-16
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
Core Consumer Price InflationPercent Change, Year-over-Year
Part of the Difference is Due to More Expansionary U.S. Fiscal Policy at the Onset of the Crisis
6Note: Fiscal expansion calculated as the difference between the primary fiscal balance compared to 2007. Asterisks (*) indica te projections.Source: International Monetary Fund, Fiscal Monitor (October 2016).
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016* 2017*
United States
France
Euro Area
Fiscal ExpansionPercent of Potential GDP
We All Need to Be Better Prepared for the Next Downturn
7
Note: Bars represent the difference between peak Federal funds rate prior to onset of recession and trough Federal funds rate during or after recession. For 2007-09 recession, the trough rate used is the lower bound (0.00 percent) set by the FOMC.Source: Federal Reserve Board; CEA ca lculations.
-681
-550-525
-800
-700
-600
-500
-400
-300
-200
-100
0
1990-91 Recession 2001 Recession 2007-09 Recession
Total FOMC Reductions to Federal Funds Ratein Response to Past Cyclical Downturns
Basis Points
Table of Contents
8
1. Motivation
2. The “New View” of Fiscal Policy
3. Application to the United States and Europe
The “Old View” of Fiscal Policy
9
1. Discretionary fiscal policy is dominated by monetary policy as a stabilization tool.
The “Old View” of Fiscal Policy
10
1. Discretionary fiscal policy is dominated by monetary policy as a stabilization tool.
2. Fiscal policy can be ineffective or have bad side effects.
The “Old View” of Fiscal Policy
11
1. Discretionary fiscal policy is dominated by monetary policy as a stabilization tool.
2. Fiscal policy can be ineffective or have bad side effects.
3. The biggest fiscal policy priority should be the long-run fiscal balance.
The “Old View” of Fiscal Policy
12
1. Discretionary fiscal policy is dominated by monetary policy as a stabilization tool.
2. Fiscal policy can be ineffective or have bad side effects.
3. The biggest fiscal policy priority should be the long-run fiscal balance.
4. If fiscal stimulus is done, it should be very short-run.
Principle #1: Fiscal Policy Can Effectively Complement Monetary Policy
13Source: National Sources via Haver Analytics.
France
Japan
United Kingdom
Germany
United States
2015
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
Real 10-Year Benchmark Rate in Selected CountriesPercent
Principle #1: Fiscal Policy Can Effectively Complement Monetary Policy
14
19962000
20052010
2015
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
PercentTen-Year Treasury Rates and Historical Economist Forecasts
Note: Forecasts are those reported by Blue Chip Economic Indicators in March of the given calendar year, the median of over fifty private-sector economists. Source: Blue Chip Economic Indicators.
Principle #2: Fiscal Policy Can Be Very Effective in Practice
15
• Large multipliers (Romer and Romer 2010)
• Evidence multipliers are larger in downturns (Nakamura and Steinsson 2014; Parker et al. 2013)
• Evidence multipliers are larger at the effective lower bound
• “Crowding in” of investment instead of crowding out:• Via accelerator (IMF 2015; OECD 2015)• Higher expected inflation → lower real interest rates
(Hall 2009; Christiano, Eichenbaum, and Rebelo 2011; Woodford 2011)
Principle #3: Fiscal Stimulus is Less Constrained by Fiscal SpaceA. Growth May Increase Sustainability in a Weak Economy
16
Baseline
Response
-16
-12
-8
-4
0
4
8
12
–1 0 1 2 3 4
Effect of Public Investment on Debt in Advanced Economies:Low Growth
Percent of GDP
Year
Baseline
Response
-16
-12
-8
-4
0
4
8
12
–1 0 1 2 3 4
Effect of Public Investment on Debt in Advanced Economies:High Growth
Percent of GDP
Year
Note: t=0 i s the year of the shock; dashed l ines denote 90-percent confidence bands. Shock represents an exogenous 1 percentage point of GDP increase in public investment spending. Source: IMF, World Economic Outlook (October 2014).
Principle #3: Fiscal Stimulus is Less Constrained by Fiscal SpaceA. Growth May Increase Sustainability If It is Effective
17Note: t=0 i s the year of the shock; dashed l ines denote 90-percent confidence bands. Shock represents an exogenous 1 percentage point of GDP increase in public investment spending. Source: IMF, World Economic Outlook (October 2014).
Baseline
Response
-16
-12
-8
-4
0
4
8
12
–1 0 1 2 3 4
Effect of Public Investment on Debt in Advanced Economies:High Efficiency
Percent of GDP
Year
Baseline
Response
-16
-12
-8
-4
0
4
8
12
–1 0 1 2 3 4
Effect of Public Investment on Debt in Advanced Economies:Low Efficiency
Percent of GDP
Year
Principle #3: Fiscal Stimulus is Less Constrained by Fiscal SpaceB. Fiscal Progress and Interest Rates
18
-2.5
-2.0
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
Changes in Spending on Health and Pensions, 2010 to 2030: 2016 IMF Forecasts vs. 2011 IMF Forecasts
Differences in Projected Growth, Percentage Points
Source: International Monetary Fund, Fiscal Monitor (Apri l 2011, Apri l 2016); CEA ca lculations.
Principle #3: Fiscal Stimulus is Less Constrained by Fiscal SpaceB. Fiscal Progress and Interest Rates (cont.)
19Source: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Canada
2017
France
Germany
Italy
Japan
UKUnited States
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020
Net Interest Payments on Government DebtPercent of GDP
Principle #3: Fiscal Stimulus is Less Constrained by Fiscal Space:C. Can Combine Short-Run Expansion and Long-Run Consolidation
20Source: Congressional Budget Office (2014); Bureau of Economic Analysis, National Income and Product Accounts; CEA ca lculations; Offi ce of Management and Budget.
2017 Continuation of Current Policies
2011 Continuation of Current Policies
2017 Under President's
FY17 Budget
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040
Comparison of Publicly Held DebtPercent of GDP
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
2009 2010 2011 2012
Recovery Act Subsequent Fiscal Measures Automatic Stabilizers
Program Year
Fiscal Expansion as a Percentage of GDP in Each Program YearPercent
Principle #4: It May Be Desirable to Pursue Sustained Fiscal Expansion
21
0.0
0.4
0.8
1.2
1.6
2.0
0 2 4 6 8 10
Effect of Permanent Increase in Government Investment on Real GDP
Percent Deviation from Baseline
Number of Years
-2.0
-1.6
-1.2
-0.8
-0.4
0.0
0.4
0 2 4 6 8 10
Effect of Permanent Increase in Government Investment on Government Debt-to-GDP Ratio
Percent Deviation from Baseline
Number of Years
Source: Gaspar, Obstfeld, and Sahay (2016).
Principle #5: Fiscal Policy Can Have Positive Global Spillovers
22
Note: Fiscal s timulus is equal to 1 percent of each region’s baseline GDP and is composed of government investment (one-quarter of total stimulus), government consumption (one-quarter of tota l stimulus) and targeted transfers (one-half of total s timulus). Monetary policy accommodates fiscal expansion by keeping th e nominal policy interest rate unchanged for two years.Source: IMF (2016).
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
CoordinatedAcross AllRegions
UnitedStates
Euro Area Japan EmergingAsia
LatinAmerica
World
United States
Euro Area
Japan
Emerging Asia
Latin America
Remaining Countries
Gobal Spillovers: Fiscal Expansion on GrowthImpact of Stimulus on Nominal GDP
Region Where Stimulus Occurs
Table of Contents
23
1. Motivation
2. The “New View” of Fiscal Policy
3. Application to the United States and Europe
Application to the United States: The United States Has Weak Automatic Stabilizers
24
AUSAUT
BEL
CANCHE
DEU
DNKESP FIN
FRA
GBR
GRCIRL
ITA
JPN
KOR
LUX NLD
NOR
NZL
PRT
SWE
USA
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
20 30 40 50 60
Government Size and the Cyclical Semi-Elasticity of Automatic Stabilizers
Elasticity (Automatic Stabilizers)
Government Size (Spending to GDP Ratio)
Source: Fatás and Mihov (2012).
Application to the United States: The Procyclical State and Local Government Response to the Great Recession
25
1975
1982
1991
2001
Current Cycle (2009:Q2 Trough)
Average Excluding
Current Cycle
80
90
100
110
120
130
Real State and Local Government Purchases During RecoveriesIndex, Business-Cycle Trough = 100
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis, National Income and Product Accounts; CEA ca lculations.
Application to the Euro Area
26
• Institutional structure of the euro area—reflecting Old View of fiscal policy—is a barrier to effective policy and has amplified shocks:• No bloc-wide management of macroeconomic policy other than
European Central Bank• Asymmetric coordination via the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP)• SGP focused on current deficits/debt, without incorporating future
liabilities
• Possible solutions:• Do not undermine automatic stabilizers with procyclical
discretionary fiscal policy• Greater coordination of fiscal expansion, especially infrastructure• Enhanced automatic stabilizers, ideally at the euro area-level• Revisions to the SGP or a new multilateral agreement• Euro area fiscal policy
The New View of Fiscal Policy and Its ApplicationJason Furman
Chairman, Council of Economic Advisers
France StratégieParis, France
November 16, 2016