the milky way, our galaxy
TRANSCRIPT
1
Diffuse Band of light that crosses the Sky in the North Galileo: it’s faint stars Early speculation and fleshing out where we are
The Milky Way, Our galaxy
Milky Way from
Zuerich
Milky Way from Australia
Milky Way from Australia
5
Diffuse band of light crossing the night sky. Naked eye, all cultures seen and named it:
• a Celestial River • a Celestial Road or Path
Our words "Galaxy" and "Milky Way" are derived from Greek and Latin:
• Greek: Galaxias kuklos = "Milky Band" • Latin: Via Lactea = "Road of Milk"
Milky Way
6
• Galileo observed the Milky Way with his telescope • Published the pamphlet, Siderius Nuncius (The
Starry Messenger) "For the Galaxy is nothing else than a congeries of innumerable stars distributed in clusters."
This was the first observation that showed that the Milky Way was simply made of many many unresolved faint stars.
"The Starry Messenger” Galileo (1610)
7
Go outside on a foggy day, you are clearly at the center of the Universe! Peeking ahead
• absorption has an attenuation length of ~1kpc • vertical structure of the disk is ~0.2kpc • radial structure is ~4-5kpc • we are 10kpc from the center of the galaxy, the
Absorption hides radial structure, but we see that the structure is “flattened”
Absorption
8
• Motivated by theology • No new observations. His Milky Way was a thin spherical shell of stars. Sun is inside the shell; midway between the inner and outer edges • Looking along the shell:
See a broad band of stars ("Milky Way")
Look out the thin part of the shell: See few stars
Early Models/Ideas: Thomas Wright (1750):
Woodcut by Wright
9
Misread a newspaper account of Wright's model. Also made no observations of his own. • Lens-shaped disk of stars rotating about its center. • No special place for the Sun. • Other "nebulae" are distant Milky Ways like ours
Became known as the "Island Universe" Hypothesis, a term first used by Alexander von Humboldt, Cosmos (1845).
Early Ideas II. Immanuel Kant (1755):
10
Heroic new observations: • Counted stars along 683 lines of sight using their
20-foot long telescope with a 19-inch mirror • Assumed that stars are uniformly distributed
through space, out to the edges of the Milky Way. • Assumed that their telescope could resolve all stars
within the the Milky Way. Herschel did not assume that all stars are the same luminosity for his Star Gage method to work but he made that assumption in other work. • Flattened Milky Way ("grindstone") • Sun located near-ish the center.
William & Caroline Herschel’s Star Gages (1785)
11
It’s always stated incorrectly that the Sun was at the center
12
• Star counts from photographic plates • Estimated distances statistically based on
parallaxes & proper motions of nearby stars • Neglected absorption!!
Milky Way is a flattened disk ~15 kpc across & ~3 kpc thick The Sun is located off-center (again, it’s always said nearly at the center, but ~40% of all stars were closer to the center)
Jacobus Kapteyn (1901-22) Universe
13
Shapley noted two facts about Globular Clusters: • Half “above” & half “below”
the Milky Way. • Concentrated on the sky
toward Sagittarius Estimated Globular Cluster distances from observations of their RR Lyrae stars Used these distances to map the globular cluster distribution in space.
Harlow Shapley (1915 thru 1921)
Sun is at 0,0; His Galaxy center
is Red X
Globular clusters
• Compact, spherical group of stars• Up to several 105-6 stars (105-6 solar
luminosities typical)• All stars formed together, same age• Form a halo (metal poor) and thick disk
(not so metal poor) around the Milky Way
M15
M13
Dust Absorptions would alterthe HR diagram of a Globular
Cluster in very specificways that let you determine absorption and reddening
Globular cluster system
Globular clusters in Sagittarius
GC distribution
21
• GCs are objects centered on the Milky Way • The Sun is 16 kpc from the MW center. • MW is a flattened disk ~100 kpc across Right basic result, but too big
Shapley ignored interstellar absorption Caused him to overestimate the distances.
Shapley’s Final 1921 Conclusion
22
• Interstellar space is filled with gas and dust • Dust absorbs and scatters starlight • Distant objects look fainter than they would be if
there were no interstellar dust. • When ignored, you get serious overestimates of
Luminosity Distances. Absorption by Interstellar Dust affects all attempts to map the Milky Way: Shapley & Kapteyn ignored so overestimated the size of the Milky Way. Robert Trumpler (1930) showed that interstellar dust absorption was significant.
Back to Absorption by Dust
23
• Extinction, the light is absorbed • “Reddening” blue light is preferentially scattered
(infrared provides a clear view • Polarization, scattering of light leads to
polarization
How can you tell the effect of dust?
24
• If particles are very small, scattering is “Rayleigh scattering” and attentuation would be proportional to λ-4
• If absorption were by “large rocks”, it would be independent of wavelength λ0
• What we see is λ-1 This means that the dust particles are comparable to the wavelength of light
Reddening
25
• If I have a very hot O or B star, the lines are distinctive. If I see lines that tell me that I’ve got a very hot (bluish) star, but my broad band colors (define) are “red”, then the object must be “reddened”
• put succinctly the spectral lines would be at odds with the continuum emission
How can we tell something is reddened?
26
• If I have objects that are extended (like a globular star cluster) and I see they are getting fainter than I expect by looking at their angular size, that’s absorption
• Absorption is patchy, where is the most likely “blue hole”?
• Star counts betray an absorption patch and we can measure the distance to the “dark cloud”
How can I tell that there is absorption?
27
• I should see absorption and reddening correlated, which is the case
Ultimately
28
• Because the grains are small (e.g. slightly smaller than visual light), they are easily aligned with interstellar magnetic fields
• See the polarization of light passing thru grains tells us about both the grains and the B field
• You selectively eliminate light with polarization vectors aligned along the dust grains, the grains align with fields
Polarization
29
Above is 2 micron survey • Sun is 8 kpc from the Galactic Center,
which is in the direction of the constellation of Sagittarius
• The disk is ~30 kpc in diameter and ~0.5 kpc thick (0.25 each direction) at the location of the Sun.
• Obscuration is key AND far less in the Infrared!!
Modern Model
30
William Parsons, 3rd Earl of Rosse (c. 1845) Built a 72-inch telescope known as the "Parsonstown Leviathan" Discovered the "Spiral Nebulae" • Appeared to be disks with a spiral pattern to them • Some appeared edge-on disks bisected by dark
bands • His telescope could not resolve them into stars.
Spiral Nebulae
31
Early big eyes
Herschel’s ☚20ft; 18.5” 40ft; 48”☛
Lord Rosse 72in mirror
53ft 1845
32
Car
Rosse drawings and photos
Whirlpool M51
33
Car
Rosse drawings and photos
Crab Neb. M1
Whirlpool M51
34
Owl Neb M97
M99 galaxy
35
Kant's idea (1755) boosted by von Humboldt (1845): • Spiral Nebulae are other Milky Ways (or galaxies)
made of stars. • Very distant and external to our Galaxy.
The Milky Way is just one of many galaxies in a vast Universe of Galaxies
Island Universe Hypothesis
36
Revival of a Solar System model of Pierre Simone Laplace (1796) and applied to other nebulae • Spiral Nebulae are swirling gas clouds • Nearby and internal to our Milky Way • Might be forming solar systems The Milky Way is the Universe.
Nebular Hypothesis
37
Careful study of Rosse’s photographs and consideration of “Nebular color”
• Divided “Green Nebulae” and “White Nebulae” • White nebulae are galaxies like ours • Green nebulae are “planetary nebulae”
Alexander really nailed it, but the history and astronomy books don’t give him fair credit Had to be rediscovered 70-80 years later
Stephen Alexander Synthesis of 1852