the michelin case

15
Michelin case Until 2011: development of new tyre through testing of different prototypes For each test: a prototype has to be produced, tested and analyzed This was very time consuming and costly And tends to alchemy ! The most experienced guy! OK/ ntO k Not OK OK # of prototype cycling time = 20 cycles Tested towards following objectives: Durability Aquaplaning Environmental friendliness Costs

Upload: sirris

Post on 17-Jul-2015

218 views

Category:

Technology


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The michelin case

Michelin case

• Until 2011: development of new tyre

through testing of different prototypes

• For each test: a prototype has to be

produced, tested and analyzed

• This was very time consuming and costly

• And tends to alchemy ! The most experienced guy!

OK/ntO

k

Not OK

OK

# of prototype cycling time = 20 cycles

Tested towards following objectives:

• Durability

• Aquaplaning

• Environmental friendliness

• Costs

Page 2: The michelin case

• From 2011: development of new tyre

through use of CAE-software

for design of optimal aquaplaning tyre

SlideSlide 1616BELGISCHE STARTCONFERENTIE KP7 30-01-2007

History of TROPHY projectHistory of TROPHY project

Complexity of hydroplaning

Page 3: The michelin case

• Use of CAE-software for optimal aquaplaning tyre

FrauenhoferM

pCCSI

soware

!" #$%&'( ) '* $+ , - . '/ 01 '&234 . 5, '

/ 01 '&6+ $7. %8'9 $%#$%': '

!"#$%&'( ) '* +, -* . /0'123'

&456 . /7'

123'&89 $:. %-'; $%#$%'<'

Page 4: The michelin case

• Result :

– Less prototypes needed

• Thus cheaper R&D costs

– Quicker result : shorter time-to-market

• Thus more competitive

– And safer tyre

OK/ntO

k

Not OK

OK

# of prototype cycling time = 15 cycles

Still Tested towards following objectives:

• Aquaplaning • Durability • Environmental friendliness • Costs

Use of CAE-software

Prototype cycling time reduced with 25%

Page 5: The michelin case

Objective=

aquaplaning Scale of Aquaplaning degree

0 10 7

• This CAE software results for the OBJECTIVE = aquaplaning in a most optimal solution

FrauenhoferM

pCCSI

soware

!" #$%&'( ) '* $+ , - . '/ 01 '&234 . 5, '

/ 01 '&6+ $7. %8'9 $%#$%': '

!"#$%&'( ) '* +, -* . /0'123'

&456 . /7'

123'&89 $:. %-'; $%#$%'<'

8

result

• But:...uncertainties road conditions, tyre production, rain conditions

• Reliability result ?

Page 6: The michelin case

• Results will probably vary

FrauenhoferM

pCCSI

soware

!" #$%&'( ) '* $+ , - . '/ 01 '&234 . 5, '

/ 01 '&6+ $7. %8'9 $%#$%': '

!"#$%&'( ) '* +, -* . /0'123'

&456 . /7'

123'&89 $:. %-'; $%#$%'<'

Objective=

aquaplanning Scale of Aquaplaning degree

0 10 7 8

result

• Probably Gaussian distribution

Page 7: The michelin case

• Michelin’s ultimate target is to be able to simulate / design, through CAE-software the most optimal tyre

• which satisfies to the following multiple

objectives

– Least sensitive for aquaplaning

– the most durable

– the most environmental friendly

– And cheapest tyre !

Page 8: The michelin case

• State of the Art today :

FrauenhoferM

pCCSI

soware

!" #$%&'( ) '* $+ , - . '/ 01 '&234 . 5, '

/ 01 '&6+ $7. %8'9 $%#$%': '

!"#$%&'( ) '* +, -* . /0'123'

&456 . /7'

123'&89 $:. %-'; $%#$%'<'O

BJEC

TIV

E

aq

ua

pla

nn

ing

Result

OB

JEC

TIV

E

du

rab

ility

InputsPX CAE-ModelXCAE

simulat.OutputX

Aquaplanning

OB

JEC

TIV

E

en

viro

nm

en

t

InputsPX CAE-ModelXCAE

simulat.OutputX

Du

rab

ility

Objectives

OB

JEC

TIV

E

co

st

InputsPX CAE-ModelXCAE

simulat.OutputX

NO

ESIS

op

tim

isat

ion

so

ftw

are

Page 9: The michelin case

• State of the Art today :

FrauenhoferM

pCCSI

soware

!" #$%&'( ) '* $+ , - . '/ 01 '&234 . 5, '

/ 01 '&6+ $7. %8'9 $%#$%': '

!"#$%&'( ) '* +, -* . /0'123'

&456 . /7'

123'&89 $:. %-'; $%#$%'<'O

BJEC

TIV

E

aq

ua

pla

nn

ing

Result

OB

JEC

TIV

E

du

rab

ility

InputsPX CAE-ModelXCAE

simulat.OutputX

Aquaplanning

OB

JEC

TIV

E

en

viro

nm

en

t

InputsPX CAE-ModelXCAE

simulat.OutputX

Du

rab

ility

Objectives

OB

JEC

TIV

E

co

st

InputsPX CAE-ModelXCAE

simulat.OutputX

NO

ESIS

op

tim

isat

ion

so

ftw

are

Adding 4° objective ?

Page 10: The michelin case

• For 1 objective +/- reliable

– We can determine a relative accurate optimum

– Because uncertainties are causing little impact

• For multiple objectives not reliable

– Uncertainties accumulated above uncertainties make global optima unreliabel

Aquaplanning

Envi

ronm

ent

Du

rab

ility

Aquaplanning

Envi

ronm

ent

Du

rab

ility

Page 11: The michelin case

The euforia dream

• To design/ simulate

based on multiple

CAE-software tools,

the perfect tyre

• To find, for a series of multiple objectives, a robust global optima

Page 12: The michelin case

Added value for companies

• Savings on R&D time and costs

• Decrease time-to-market

• Decrease the company’s

product responsibility risk

Page 13: The michelin case

• Result in better, more efficient, more performant products and processes

• Change company know-how from “alchemy” to “science”

• And thus boost the company’s competitiveness

Page 14: The michelin case

• But also define better product marketing strategies

An

nu

al C

ost

s (E

UR

/ite

m)

Effectiveness

Pareto Front Most optimal robust designs

Initial product

Sales price Initial product

C0

E0

Graph A: Positioning initial product vs Pareto Front

New design A

New design B

Sales price positioning B

Sales price Initial product Sales price positiong A

Page 15: The michelin case

They consider this issue as a major shortcomming of Computer Based Engineering

• Sic Roll Royce

“Optimization under uncertainties is the

following big scientific challenge for Computed Aided Engineering !”