the magnetar primer shriharsh p. tendulkar california institute of technology s. r. kulkarni p. b....
TRANSCRIPT
The Magnetar Primer
Shriharsh P. TendulkarCalifornia Institute of Technology
S. R. KulkarniP. B. Cameron
S. Tendulkar, RRI 2013 2
The Neutron Star Household
• Pulsars (1967)• Soft Gamma Repeaters (1979)• Recycled Pulsars (MSPs etc) (1982)• Isolated Neutron Stars (1992-1996) • Anomalous X-ray Pulsars (1995)• Compact Central Objects (around 2003)• RRaTs (2006)
13/02/13
S. Tendulkar, RRI 2013 3
Where does everything fit?
13/02/13
SGRsAXPs
INSsRRaTsStandard
Issue Pulsars
MSPs
S. Tendulkar, RRI 2013 4
Where does everything fit?
13/02/13
Magnetic Field Powered
Rotation Powered
“Accretion” Powered
S. Tendulkar, RRI 2013 5
AXPs
• Anomalous X-ray Pulsars
• LX ~ 1035-36 erg/s
• Lrot ~1032 erg/s
• No companions
13/02/13
AXP 1E 2259+586 inside CTB 109
S. Tendulkar, RRI 2013 6
SGRs
• Soft Gamma Repeaters
• Short bursts:– 1042 ergs/s
• Giant flares– 2-500 x 1044 ergs– -29 mag!
13/02/13
S. Tendulkar, RRI 2013 7
What is a magnetar?
• Highly magnetized NS– B ≈ 1015 G– Young– Slowly rotating (P ≈ 5-10 s)
13/02/13
S. Tendulkar, RRI 2013 8
What is a magnetar?
13/02/13
1 2
3 4
Scientific American 2003R. Duncan
AXPSGR
S. Tendulkar, RRI 2013 9
Reasons for high B
• Spin down (1979 burst)– 8 sec in 104 years
• Energetics– Variability– No baryons
• Magnetic Containment
13/02/13
S. Tendulkar, RRI 2013 10
Magnetar vs Pulsar
• Low B field ‘magnetar’– SGR 0418+5729– B~7 x 1012 G
• Radio quiet, X-ray bright
• Unsteady pulses, ratty Pdot
• High B field pulsars– Few x 1013 G
• Radio bright, X-ray quiet
• Steady pulses, decline
13/02/13
S. Tendulkar, RRI 2013 11
Open Questions
• Formation– B-field Dynamo vs Fossil– Progenitors:
• Mass, Spin, High B-field?
– Age– Kinematics (~1000 km/s?)– SN energies
• Evolution– Lifetime
13/02/13
S. Tendulkar, RRI 2013 12
Wider Relevance
• Neutron Star census– Millions might be floating around?– Star formation history etc.
• Fraction of short-hard GRBs (Ofek et al)– Rate of NS-NS mergers
• Energetic supernovae (Kasen & Bildsten 2010)
13/02/13
S. Tendulkar, RRI 2013 14
Why Astrometry?
• Kinematics– Comparison to other NS groups
• Ages– Model free
• Progenitors/Birth-places
13/02/13
• Challenges:– Can’t work in X-rays– Very few radio/IR counterparts
S. Tendulkar, RRI 2013 15
OIR Astrometry
• Hubble Space Telescope– Large FoV– Stable Distortion– Diffraction Limited
• Very precise astrometry!– ≈ 0.020 mas/yr over 7 years
(Kallivayalil et al. 2013)
13/02/13
S. Tendulkar, RRI 2013 16
Challenges in AO astrometry
• Small FoV (10-40”)
• Anisoplanatism– Changing PSF
• Variable Performance– Atmosphere
dependent
13/02/13
S. Tendulkar, RRI 2013 17
Optimal Astrometry
• Tip-tilt Anisoplanatism
13/02/13
Sasiela 1994
Cameron et al. 2009
S. Tendulkar, RRI 2013 19
Performance
13/02/13
Palomar 5-m telescope
Cameron et al 2009Measurement Noise Tip-tilt Anisoplanatism
S. Tendulkar, RRI 2013 20
SGR 1900+14
• Giant flare: 27th Aug 1998• d ≈ 12 kpc• OIR counterpart (Testa et al. 2008)
13/02/13
40 arcsec
Cluster of Massive Stars(Vrba et al. 2000)
Turnoff mass≈ 17 M
(Davies et al. 2009)
S. Tendulkar, RRI 2013 21
SGR 1806-20
• Giant flare: 27th Dec 2004• d ≈ 15 kpc• OIR counterpart (Israel et al. 2005)
13/02/13
Cluster of Massive Stars(Fuchs et al. 1999)
Turnoff mass≈ 50 M
(Bibby et al. 2008)
S. Tendulkar, RRI 2013 22
AXP 4U 0142+61
• Brightest AXP• d ≈ 3 kpc
• Counterpart (Hulleman et al. 2000)
• OIR pulsations (Kern & Martin 2002)
• No association13/02/13
S. Tendulkar, RRI 2013 23
AXP 1E 2259+586
• Center of CTB 109• d ≈ 3 kpc
• OIR counterpart (Hulleman et al. 2001)
13/02/1314 arcmin
CTB 109
S. Tendulkar, RRI 2013 25
SGR 1900+14
13/02/13
Galactic Rotation
Expected Progenitor Velocity
MeasuredMagnetarVelocity
Galactic Plane
S. Tendulkar, RRI 2013 31
AXP 1E 2259+586
13/02/13
Current Center of CTB 109
Age = 14 kyr(Sasaki et al. 2013)
Center of explosion DEN
SE M
OLE
CULA
R CL
OU
DTendulkar et al. in prep
S. Tendulkar, RRI 2013 34
Magnetar Kinematics
Magnetar Vtan (km/s) Association Method Reference
AXP 1E 1810−197 212±35 – VLBI Helfand et al (2007)
AXP 1E 1547.0-5408 280±120 SNR G327.4-0.13
VLBI Deller et al (2012)
SGR 1900+14 130±30 Cluster LGSAO Tendulkar et al (2012)
SGR 1806-20 350±100 Cluster LGSAO Tendulkar et al (2012)
AXP 1E 2259+586 157±17 SNR CTB 109 LGSAO Tendulkar et al (subm)
AXP 4U 0142+61 102±26 – LGSAO Tendulkar et al (subm)
13/02/13
S. Tendulkar, RRI 2013 35
Magnetar Kinematics
13/02/13
Tendulkar et al. in prep
Matches the velocity distribution of normal pulsars (Hobbs 2005)
S. Tendulkar, RRI 2013 37
Timeline
• 24th April ‘13 SWIFT XRT brightening– 0.11 cts/s (1.3 x 1035 ergs/s)
13/02/13
S. Tendulkar, RRI 2013 38
Timeline
• 24th April ‘13 SWIFT XRT brightening– 0.11 cts/s (1.3 x 1035 ergs/s)
• 26th April ‘13 SWIFT BAT flare– 32 ms, 2500 cts/s
13/02/13
S. Tendulkar, RRI 2013 39
Timeline
• 26th April ‘13 SWIFT BAT flare– 32 ms, 2500 cts/s
• 26th April ‘13 NuSTAR ToO6 hr obs
– 3.76 sec period
13/02/13
S. Tendulkar, RRI 2013 40
Timeline
• 26th April ‘13 NuSTAR ToO6 hr obs
– 3.76 sec period
• 29th April ‘13 Chandra position– 3” away from GC (0.1 pc)
13/02/13
S. Tendulkar, RRI 2013 41
Timeline
• 29th April ‘13 Chandra position– 3” away from GC (0.1 pc)
• 4th May ‘13 NuSTAR– 7 hrs– Pdot = 6 x 10-12 s/s– B ~ 1.5 x 1014 G
13/02/13
S. Tendulkar, RRI 2013 42
Timeline
• 4th May ‘13 NuSTAR– 7 hrs– Pdot = 6 x 10-12 s/s– B ~ 1.5 x 1014 G
• 6th May ’13 Paper to ApJL– Kaya Mori et al.
13/02/13
S. Tendulkar, RRI 2013 43
Implications
• Very similar to other magnetars
• Probably born in O/WR stars– 6 Myr old 40 M
• More evidence for “transient” magnetars– Link to high-B pulsars
13/02/13