the last jezreel

7/27/2019 The Last Jezreel

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-last-jezreel 1/8

THE LAST JEZREEL

Who is the last Jezreel? Is it V.T. Houteff? This question is being agitated among us to bring before you the

seriousness of this momentous issue give rise demands that we cease fooling ourselves or letting others make

fools of us. Indeed, brethren its growing gravity challenges each one of us no longer to dodge the issue as did the

Jews in their day, and thereby loose out, but rather to meet it as Christ met the Sanhedrin, and thus gloriously win

out.

It is high time now, that each one of us, should finally resolved, in every mind, once for all, the questions as to

who is who and what is what. Even if you are not one who is personally tormented by this message, still you

should fortify yourselves with the facts, so you may be able to administer with the healing ointment of Truth to

those who are suffering from its torments. (See GCS pages 3-5)

“In view of these solemn realities even now looming before our eyes, no longer, Brother, Sister, hide yourself

in the darkness. Stand in the light, lest you stumble and fall and not be found. Come, take time, and Let Us

Reason Together.” (1 Ans. 8) “To begin our investigation, it is necessary, in fairness to both sides, to take into

account the experiential knowledge of each.” (1 Ans. 20) “Then, too, having every reason to believe that our

minds are fully rational, we accordingly have every reason to believe that we are no less able than others

intelligently to study both the Bible and Sister White’s writings (as well as V.T. Houteff ). So let us, as Christians

who really want to know the truth, together begin Examining Both Your Position And Ours.” (1 Ans. 22)

With sincerity and honestly, God knows how deep our love towards V.T. Houteff, although it will not exceed

our love towards our God. “Take for example the Jews: They were determined to “be of Moses,” and as they saw

it, to accept the prophets, or even Christ, to them it meant to give up Moses! As a result, rather than all things

being theirs, they lost everything, even Moses, and where are they today? The wood, hay, and stubble which they

piled upon the structure of Truth after Moses left them, has long been swept away by the Fire of Truth, the Holy

Spirit.” (2 TG 27:9)

Therefore, Inspiration declared: “To glory in man, whether it be in self or in another, is to cheat yourself of

everything.” (2 TG 27:9) The voice of prophecy declared:

GC 170 – “The work of reform is often retarded because of this spirit indulged by its supporters. From this

danger, God would guard the cause of the Reformation. He desired that work to receive, not the impress of man,

but that of God. The eyes of men had been turned to Luther as the expounder of the truth; he was removed that

all eyes might be directed to the eternal Author of truth.” (GC 170)

DA 181, 182 – “John had been called to lead out as a reformer. Because of this, his disciples were in danger of

fixing their attention upon him, feeling that the success of the work depended upon his labors, and losing sight of

the fact that he was only an instrument through which God had wrought. But the work of John was not sufficient

to lay the foundation of the Christian church. When he had fulfilled his mission, another work was to be done,

which his testimony could not accomplish. His disciples did not understand this. When they saw Christ coming into take the work, they were jealous and dissatisfied.

The same dangers still exist. God calls a man to do a certain work; and when he has carried it as far as he is

qualified to take it, the Lord brings in others, to carry it still farther. But, like John’s disciples, many feel that the

success of the work depends on the first laborer. Attention is fixed upon the human instead of the divine, jealousy

comes in, and the work of God is marred. The one thus unduly honored is tempted to cherish self -confidence. He

does not realize his dependence on God. The people are taught to rely on man for guidance, and thus they fall

into error, and are led away from God.

The work of God is not to bear the image and superscription of man. From time to time the Lord will bring in

different agencies, through whom His purpose can best be accomplished. Happy are they who are willing for self to be humbled, saying with John the Baptist, “He must increase, but I must decrease.” (DA 181-182)



GC 291-292 – “Brethren, we are now erelong to part asunder, and the Lord knoweth whether I shall live ever

to see your faces more. But whether the Lord hath appointed it or not, I charge you before God and His blessed

angels to follow me no farther than I have followed Christ. If God should reveal anything to you by any other

instrument of His, be as ready to receive it as ever you were to receive any truth of my ministry; for I am very

confident the Lord hath more truth and light yet to break forth out of His holy word.”--Martyn, vol. 5, p. 70.

“For my part, I cannot sufficiently bewail the condition of the reformed churches, who are come to a period

in religion, and will go at present no farther than the instruments of their reformation. The Lutherans cannot bedrawn to go beyond what Luther saw;... and the Calvinists, you see, stick fast where they were left by that great

man of God, who yet saw not all things. This is a misery much to be lamented; for though they were burning and

shining lights in their time, yet they penetrated not into the whole counsel of God, but were they now living,

would be as willing to embrace further light as that which they first received.” --D. Neal, History of the

Puritans, vol. 1, p. 269.

“Remember your church covenant, in which you have agreed to walk in all the ways of the Lord, made or to

be made known unto you. Remember your promise and covenant with God and with one another, to receive

whatever light and truth shall be made known to you from His written word; but withal, take heed, I beseech you,

what you receive for truth, and compare it and weigh it with other scriptures of truth before you accept it; for it is

not possible the Christian world should come so lately out of such thick antichristian darkness, and that full perfection of knowledge should break forth at once.”--Martyn, vol. 5, pp. 70, 71. (GC 291-292)

“… if a message comes that you do not understand, take pains that you may hear the reasons the messenger

may give, comparing scripture with scripture, that you may know whether or not it is sustained by the word of

God. If you believe that the positions taken have not the word of God for their foundation, if the position you

hold on the subject cannot be controverted, then produce your strong reasons; for your position will not be

shaken by coming in contact with error. There is no virtue or manliness in keeping up a continual warfare in the

dark, closing your eyes lest you may see, closing your ears lest you may hear, hardening your heart in ignorance

and unbelief lest you may have to humble yourselves and acknowledge that you have received light on some

points of truth.” (CSW 29)

Brethren, we should ever remember that the writings of E.G. White and V.T. Houteff must never be

interpreted in such a way as to contradict the Bible, but always to clear it. If we undeviatingly follow this

absolute rule of interpretation, you can never possibly have any trouble with the Rod or with any message the

Lord may ever send.” (1 Ans. 23)

No candid Bible student could arrive at any conclusion which would lead him to base his interpretation of the

subject on one passage and wholly ignore the other, but would rather seek to make his final analysis in such a

way as to be in perfect harmony with all inspired writings, or else confess that he does not have the light on the

Scriptures. (1 SC 10:8) “A conclusion which is based upon a single citation, though the passage be ever so plain,

but which conclusion can not be harmonized with every other authoritative statement on the same subject, is not

a safe and honest rule of interpretation.” (3 SC 1:9) Let us remember always to observe the inviolable rule that

an interpretation of one inspired statement must harmonize with all other related statements. (3 Ans. 41)

To begin our investigation, let us read… Hosea 1:11 – Then shall the children of Judah and the children of Israel be gathered together, and appoint

themselves one head, and they shall come up out of the land: for great [ shall be] the day of Jezreel.

2 SR 289 – “Find your explanations “in the Bowl,” and you will have no trouble in knowing the truth, or of

avoiding the ever ready trap of deception. Thus the difficulty in knowing the difference between truth and error is

eliminated.” (2 SR 289)

11 TR 12 – “All present truth believers should now see the necessity of shunning every wind of doctrineregardless how plausible or reasonable it might appear to be. Remember the words: “Behold, those that go -



- toward the north country have quieted My Spirit in the north country.” (See p. 27 of Tract No. 2, The Warning

Paradox, -- Zech. 6:1-8.) Get your doctrine, Brother, Sister, only from the golden bowl (see The Shepherd’s

Rod,Vol. 2), and be not like the waves of the sea, driven with the wind and tossed -- be not carried about by the

many winds of doctrine that are blowing wildly from every direction to cause you to lose your way to the

everlasting kingdom.” (11 TR 12)

2 TG 43:16, 17 – “The prophecy nevertheless continues and projects to the gathering time, the time God’s

penitent people appoint to themselves one head, a king. These, of course, are not the unconverted Jews of today, but they are the descendants from among those who have been assimilated by the nations and by the Christian

church, from those who have lost their identity and who are now “as the sands of the sea” in number, but who

now as Gentiles (gentiles to their own and to the world’s short-sighted knowledge) have accepted Christ. (You

who have missed my past studies on the subject, may read Timely Greetings, Vol. 1, No. 29 and Tract No. 8,

Mt Sion at the 11th Hour, pp. 7-17.)

Who is the earthly head, king, whom the Scriptures say the people “appoint” at the gathering time? -- Let us

read, Hos. 3:4, 5 -- “For the children of Israel shall abide many days without a king, and without a prince, and

without a sacrifice, and without an image, and without an ephod, and without teraphim: afterward shall thechildren of Israel return, and seek the Lord their God, and David their king; and shall fear the Lord and His

goodness in the latter days.”

In this part of the prophecy, you see, we are told that after they have sojourned among the Gentiles for “many

days” without a king, and without any sign of identification (having been entirely lost sight of as a nation and as

a people), they shall finally have antitypical David rule over them. This would not be ancient David as he was

already dead when this prophecy was made. Neither could this promised David be Christ Himself, for Christ is

the son of David (Matt. 22:42), not David himself; and if He shall, moreover, sit on the throne of David (Lu.

1:32), then David must have a throne for Him to sit on.” (2 TG 43:16, 17)

The statement is very plain, that Hosea 1:11 projects to the gathering time, the time God’s penitent people

appoint to themselves one head – a king. Inspiration declared…Who is the earthly head, king, whom the

Scriptures say the people “appoint” at the gathering time? Then, plainly declared, that it is antitypical David.

Now the question is, does the prediction concerning this antitypical David been fulfilled in the days of V.T.

Houteff? Let us read…

2 TG 2:17, 18 – “In the days of this antitypical David God gathers His flock from all the countries where they

have been scattered, and brings them into their own land. God will no longer leave them in the mountains and the

hills of the Gentiles. “Then shall the children of Judah and the children of Israel be gathered together, and appoint

themselves one head, and they shall come up out of the land: for great shall be the day of Jezreel. Afterward shall

the children of Israel return, and seek the Lord their God, and David their king; and shall fear the Lord and His

goodness in the latter days.” Hos. 1:11; 3:5. (2 TG 2:17, 18)

The SROD declared: “…In the days of these kings,” cannot mean after their days. (1 Ans. 24) And the Bible

declared: “And all the days that Adam lived were nine hundred and thirty years: and he died.” (Gen. 5:5)

Plainly shows, that after such man died, it could no longer be considered as still consider as a part of his days.

And inspiration declared clearly… “In the days of this antitypical David God gathers His people from all

countries.” Remember, it is God who will be the one to gather His people. And the mere fact that V.T. Houteff

died in Feb. 5, 1955, and still God did not as yet gather His people, impregnably builds the absolute fact, that he

could not be the predicted antitypical David by which in his days God will gather His people from all countries.

And since this antitypical David is the predicted – the very last Jezreel in Hosea 1:11, to declare that it is V.T.

Houteff, then we are accusing that God was greatly mistaken. The days of V.T. Houteff ended on Feb. 5, 1955,

but God had not been able to gather His people. What an absurdity, and a great insult to God Himself. Now let usread…



2 TG 6:17, 18 – “Here we see that the names of the two children of chapter 1 are again mentioned, but the

first two letters of each name have been dropped: Lo-ruhamah has become Ruhamah, and Lo-Ammi has become

Ammi. Now the fact that these are the brother and sister of Jezreel, bears out the truth that the one whom the

Lord commands to speak to them, is Jezreel, the first- born of the three. He is to deliver the message to his

brethren, Ammi and Ruhamah.

Now, what is it all about? -- It is not too difficult to see. The one to whom God speaks, Jezreel, represents a

prophet. His brother and sister, Ammi and Ruhamah, can only represent the church membership, both male andfemale. In actuality Jezreel must deliver God’s message to them.” (2 TG 6:17, 18)

What does it mean by the word “actuality”? The word “actual” is an adjective. Meaning, existing in fact, real

being in existence or action now present. But the word “actuality” is a noun. The quality of being actual, reality

or presently existing in fact as being real.

With such definition, would you think V.T. Houteff, in actuality deliver God’s message to us while lying

unconscious in his grave? Think it, thoroughly! Inspiration declared…

2 TG 6:26 – “Jezreel’s name, though, remains the same, and as he represents the prophets of God in all times,

this shows that they are the descendants of Jacob and therefore we must hear and obey them.” (2 TG 6:26)

According to the allegorical prophecy, God did not speak directly to Ammi and Ruhamma. He channels his

message to Jezreel, and then in turn… “In actuality Jezreel must deliver God’s message to them (Ruhamma and

Ammi). (2 TG 6:18)

The Davidian at the present time had been deeply vitiated by the Protestant world that has long held the

concept that God does not in this age employ an inspired mouthpiece to interpret the Scriptures and to declare

His will, but invests and leads each Davidian individually. This theory, however, is universally exploded when

viewed in the light of the fact that those individuals (Davidian) claiming to be personally led of God, disagree

among themselves just as much as the various sects disagree one with another. (3 Ans. 29)

The SROD never teach such doctrine. Contrariwise, declared clearly: “As a necessary and natural sequent,

God will have but one mouthpiece to teach His people in the establishing of His Kingdom, as He prophetically

tells us in unmistakable language: “And I will set up one shepherd over them, and he shall feed them, even My

servant David; he shall feed them, and he shall be their shepherd. And I the Lord will be their God, and My

servant David a prince among them; I the Lord have spoken it. And I will make with them a covenant of peace,

and will cause the evil beasts to cease out of the land: and they shall dwell safely in the wilderness, and sleep in

the woods. And I will make them and the places round about My hill a blessing; and I will cause the shower to

come down in his season; there shall be showers of blessing.” Ezek. 34:23-26. “The Lord’s voice crieth unto the

city, and the man of wisdom shall see thy name: hear ye the Rod, and Who hath appointed it.” “Feed thy people

with thy Rod, the flock of thine heritage, which dwell solitarily in the wood, in the midst of Carmel: let them feed

in Bashan and Gilead, as in the days of old. According to the days of thy coming out of the land of Egypt will I

shew unto him marvelous things.” Mic. 6:9; 7:14, 15.” (3 Ans. 32, 33)

There is no dispute to the fact, that from 1930 to 1955, God’s mouthpiece was V.T. Houteff. But since V.T.

Houteff is in his grave, the king here promised must be an antitypical David, and it cannot be V.T. Houteff.

Otherwise, in order to fulfill the prophecy V.T. Houteff must necessarily rise from his grave. ( 9 TR 43, emphasis

is mine).

And since according to 3 Ans. 32, 33 antitypical David must be God’s mouthpiece, perfectly corroborates

with that of 2 TG 6:18 that Jezreel represents the mouthpiece of God. Therefore, to declare that V.T. Houteff is

the last Jezreel, is to completely cut off the communication from God. For the Bible plainly declared, that God’s

message is channeled to Jezreel. And God never channeled His message to a dead “Jezreel” (prophet).

4 TR 56, 57 – “As Jezreel typifies the prophets who have been killed, as well as those who today are being

“killed” (rejected) by all who despise the gift of prophecy ( 1 Thess. 5:20), the valley of Jezreel, also, therefore is

typical.



That is, as Jezreel represents the prophets, and as the “valley of Achor” (Hos. 2:15) stands for the destruction

of those who are guilty of Achan’s sin, then the “valley of Jezreel,” the place where Jehu destroyed the rejecters

of the prophets, (Hos. 1:5) must stand for the destruction of those who reject the Spirit of Prophecy today. Those

who thus become disqualified and eliminated from being the Lord’s servants in His final work, are to be

succeeded by The Laymen’s Movement.” (4 TR 56, 57)

4 TR 51 – “From this we see that Jezreel, the one addressed, is symbolical of a prophet who is to command

his “brethren, Ammi,” and his “sisters, Ruhamah,” to go to their “mother” and plead with her to reform. Thenames, Ruhamah and Ammi, represent a brother and a sister (singular), but in commissioning Jezreel to speak to

them, the Lord designates them in the plural, -- “brethren” and “sisters,” embracing the entire church

membership.

Obviously, therefore, God ordained that one of the laity, Jezreel, His chosen agent, was to herald the message

to Ammi and Ruhamah, his “brethren” and “sisters,” who in turn were to plead with their “mother,” the ministry.

The Lord has plainly made known this procedure because He knew that the majority are ever prone to lean on

their ministers for revelation of truth, and because they forget the tragic fact that “in the closing work” for the

church in each period, the ministry kept the flock from accepting advancing Truth, rather than leading them into

It.” (4 TR 51)

The statement definitely declared, that it is God Himself who ordained that one of the laity – must be Jezreel,

His chosen agent, was to herald the message to Ammi and Ruhamah, in actuality Jezreel must deliver God’s

message to them. (2 TG 6:18) Therefore, such effort of Revival and Reformation without Jezreel in their midst –

can never be of God.

2 TG 6:18, 19 – “Now that the laity, at the command of God are through a prophet to plead with the church,

therefore, the reformation here called forth is sponsored by Inspiration and carried out by the laity. It is the long

expected revival and reformation to the Laodiceans, and hence a layman’s movement called forth by the revived

Spirit of Prophecy.” (2 TG 6:18, 19)

Brethren, we are not discouraged, for we know that God’s sheep will recognize His voice when they hear Him

call. (2 SC 12:5) If God could be able to put in the hearts of all the Communists to give their power and strength

to the beast (2 TG 36:7), God will be the One to put into their hearts, the living saints…that they shall appoint

themselves one head.

“The ways of Inspiration are constant, the same yesterday, today, and tomorrow.” (1 Ans. 50) When God

crowned Adam as king, Adam’s natural ability to rule them, and their natural submission to him, show that all

creation, man and beast, fowl and creeping things, were divinely influenced or endowed – inspired. “So when

Adam reviewed the whole animal creation as it passed before him, he spent no time in studying the nature of the

creatures in order to identify them, but instantaneously gave every species its name; they, in turn, immediately

recognized him as their king--gave submission to him. This Super -intelligency (such as is vouchsafed in Matthew

10:19) clearly shows that all creation was influenced by a power above and beyond its own. In short, both

Adam’s and the animals’ understanding came by Inspiration.” (1 Ans. 40, 41)

1 Ans. 52, 53 – “Those, furthermore, whom the Lord promotes, ever shrink from putting themselves forward.

Though David, for example, had been anointed by Samuel to be king over Israel, he never attempted to take the

throne. As a matter of fact, he did not even so much as make known his elevation. And then at the risk of death at

Saul’s own hand, he even protected him. In all this beautiful chivalry, David showed forth the love, humility,

meekness, and righteousness born (inspired) of the Spirit of God. His was the calm, kind, forbearing patience

which comes with the sure knowledge that God is in control. Knowing that the Lord had anointed him to be king,

he happily waited until the Lord saw fit to put him on the throne.” (1 Ans. 52, 53)

6 TR 59 – “The unfolding of the prophetic scroll will reveal to all “what manner of spirit” (Gospel Workers,

p. 302) they are of --

whether willing to exchange error for truth, or whether determined to identify themselveswith the class who will forever be found Ignorantly Fighting the Truth.” (6 TR 59)



WHR 64, 65 – “The prophet Hosea, too, was shown this great ingathering of all God’s people now at the

eleventh hour:

“For the children of Israel shall abide many days without a king, and without a prince, and without a sacrifice,

and without an image, and without an ephod, and without teraphim: afterward shall the children of Israel return,

and seek the Lord their God, and David their king; and shall fear the Lord and His goodness in the latter days.”

Hos. 3:4, 5.

“Then shall the children of Judah and the children of Israel be gathered together, and appoint themselves one

head, and they shall come up out of the land: for great shall be the day of Jezreel.” Hos. 1:11.

Hosea’s aforequoted vision not only projects God’s tearing down His ancient (typical) Kingdom, and His

consequently scattering His people world-wide, thus causing them, to lose their identity and to become

assimilated by the Gentile nations during these many centuries, but also projects the glorious restoration of His

Kingdom (the antitype), and His subsequently gathering into It His people from all nations, while He is closing

the work of the gospel. Moreover, the contents of Hosea’s timely vision decisively point out that this great world-

wide work of ingathering cannot begin till “Jezreel” appears on the scene. And who can sanely suppose that

Satan will let this crowning, eleventh-hour achievement of the gospel come to pass without a last

-ditch encounter

with the mightiest forces of darkness? Nor may anyone even for a moment suppose that the Almighty did not

foreknow the situation and did not provide the means by which to meet it, one of which is the allegorical name

Jezreel, the pen name for His eleventh-hour agent. Through this simple expedient (unfamiliar name) Heaven

disarms the opposition, secures a welcome reception for the Recruiter (the voice of Jezreel), and thereby enables

It to survive the waste basket and stove, and thus to reach minds confused by falsehood, and hearts hardened by

prejudice.

Thanks to this means of victory over Satan’s conspiracy, not only the elect but even the whole earth as well

“shall hear Jezreel,” and “great,” therefore, “shall be the day of Jezreel.” Hos. 2 22; 1:11. (WHR 64, 65)

If V.T. Houteff is the last Jezreel, then tell me, what part from 1929 A.D. up to Feb. 5, 1955 “the last ditch

encounter” against Satan did occurred? And in what year, does the predicted event… “for great shall be the day

of Jezreel” been fulfilled in the days of V.T. Houteff? Brethren, inspiration declared clearly that… “Hosea’s

timely vision decisively point out that this great world-wide work of ingathering cannot begin till “Jezreel”

appears on the scene.” (WHR 65) “Jezreel’s name, though, remains the same, and as he represents the prophets

of God in all times.” (2 TG 6:26) But now, all of them are dead, would you think there is still any possibility of

God’s people being gathered? This world-wide work of ingathering cannot begin till “Jezreel” appears on the

scene. But the fact is, all of them were disappeared, and this great world -wide work of ingathering still

unfulfilled. Therefore such teaching proclaiming that V.T. Houteff is the last Jezreel is well pleasing tone to the

ear of the Devil. For he knoweth, that at the time when the first of the first fruits came into existence and

gathered into one, that would be his Waterloo. Now let us read…

2 TG 6:27 – “Next we see that the church as a whole, as a family, is composed of a father, a mother, and of sons and a daughter, that the father is God; that the wife is the ministry (those who bring in converts); that the

children are the laity. We see also that the church (woman) was married to the Lord in her youth, in the day she

came out of Egypt; that although the ministry as a whole never advanced from one truth to another, the church

(wife) continued by being replaced by new and successive ministers time and again. And now that she is deep in

whoredom, obviously she is again to be replaced by a new ministry, and thus will she become faithful to our

Father; that this will be accomplished by taking away the sinners from her midst. Then will she be given her

vineyards, and then will she and all her children live in peace and safety.

Clearly, then, lewdness shall actually flee away, and this revival and reformation brought forth by this

layman’s movement shall accomplish its given work. And so, you see that as a result of the childrens’ protest, the

whole family of God shall live happily in peace and safety forevermore.” (2 TG 6:27)



The statement definitely declared… “that although the ministry as a whole never advanced from one truth to

another, the church (wife) continued by being replaced by new and successive ministers time and again.” But the

fact is, everytime God replace the “ministry” as a family is composed of a father, a mother and of sons and

daughter. Notice the “ sons” is in plural form, but the “daughter ” is in singular form. For according to Hosea’s

allegorical vision, the two sons are Jezreel (the first born) and Ammi, and Ruhamah is the daughter. But now

Davidia is teaching that the only in existence as a family at the present time is Ammi and Ruhamah. What an

absurdity brethren! Would you think it can still be called “the church as a whole” if Jezreel is missing? Think it

thoroughly! It sounds illogical and even incomprehensible to declared that Jezreel is a dead prophet, whileRuhamah and Ammi are represented by living members. And if “Jezreel” is represented by all the prophets at all

times, then how could we specifically declared that this “dead Jezreel” is V.T. Houteff?

1966 A.D. Oct. 3, 2012 A.D. Sept. 12, 2016 A.D.

Ellen = 5 letters Gould = 5 letters

Harmon = 6 letters

White = 5 letters 21 letters

Victor = 6 letters

Tasho = 5 letters

Houteff = 7 letters 18 letters

Jezreel = 7 letters

In Oct. 3, 2012 A.D., the

ingathering of God’s peopleinto one church begins, and

within 4 Short Years it will

completely accomplished.

From Oct. 3, 2012 A.D. up to Sept. 12,

2016 A.D., the 144,000 living saintswill be completely gathered into one

church.

Martin – 6 letters

Lindemann – 9 letters

Luther – 6 letters

21 letters

John – 4 letters Sinclair – 8 letters

Knox – 4 letters

16 letters

John – 4 letters

Annesley – 8 letters

Wesley – 6 letters

18 letters

Alexander – 9 letters

Corneigle – 9 letters

Campbell – 8 letters

26 letters

William – 7 letters Phelps – 6 letters Miller – 6 letters

19 letters

Ellen – 5 letters

Gould – 5 letters

Harmon – 6 letters

White – 5 letters

21 letters

Victor – 6 letters

Tasho – 5 letters

Houteff – 7 letters

18 letters

Then,

21

18 7

46



From 1844 up to the time when the last Jezreelwas baptized, there were 142 years.

1 + 4 + 2 = 7 meaning complete.

Then, the sum would be… 21 letters, thus 2 + 1 = 3

16 letters, thus 1 + 6 = 7



19 letters, thus 1 + 9 = 10 21 letters, thus 2 + 1 = 3


There are some important questions need to be seriously considered… 1.) If we are Ruhamah and Ammi, who is he, this Jezreel who in actuality deliver God’s message to us? 2

TG 6:18

2.) Can a dead prophet give a message to us in actuality?

3.) What does it mean by the phrase “in the days of this antitypical David ”? Can it still be considered

“his days” after he died?

4.) What does it mean by “till Jezreel appears on the scene”? When Hitler died, V.T. used the term “his

disappearance”, can such statement be applied to V.T. Houteff – his disappearance in 1955?

Yours in Christ Jesus,A.D. JEZREEL

1844 A.D. 1986 A.D.

1966 A.D. 2015 A.D.

139 + 3 (the number of

Trinity) = 142

49. Number 49 has complete sevens, thus 7 x 7 = 49.

Through this numerology, plainly shows that this last

Jezreel will meet the last ditch encounter with the devil at

the age of 49.

The last Jezreel was born.

the last jezreel

Documents