the lagrangian approach for fiber suspension flows · amin safi | tu dortmund [1] lukáš likavČan...
TRANSCRIPT
Page 1Page 1Amin Safi | TU Dortmund
Page 1
The Lagrangian approach for fiber suspension flows
Omid Ahmadi
Page 2Page 2Amin Safi | TU Dortmund
Page 2
Outline
1. Motivation
2. Basics
3. One-way coupling
4. Fiber interactions
5. Two-way coupling
Page 3Page 3Amin Safi | TU Dortmund
Page 3
Motivation
Voith papermaking production line
Page 4Page 4Amin Safi | TU Dortmund
Page 4
Fluid phase :∂u∂ t
+u⋅∇u=−∇ p+∇⋅(2ν D)
Fiber suspension :
Lagrangian Approach :
● Accurate (specially near solid boundaries)
● Costly, each fiber must be tracked individually
Eulerian Approach :
● Cannot describe the detailed motion of individual fibers
● Computationally more efficient
∇⋅u=0
Page 5Page 5Amin Safi | TU Dortmund
Page 5
The Lagrangian Approach
ODE for the center of mass Xi, of the i-th fiber :
X i(0)=X i0
Jeffery equation for the fiber orientation :
pi(0)=p i0
dX i
dt=u(X i) ,
dpi
dt=W⋅pi+λ[D⋅pi−D :( pi⊗ pi)⋅pi] ,
p = Orientation vector, W = Spin tensor, D = Strain rate tensor, λ= Shape parameter
Page 6Page 6Amin Safi | TU Dortmund
Page 6 [1] Lukáš LIKAVČAN et al. 2014
Orientation Tensors
The 2nd and 4th order orientation tensors :
A (x ,t )=⟨nn ⟩=∫S
(p⊗ p)ψ( p , x , t )dp
A (x ,t )=⟨nnnn ⟩=∫S
( p⊗ p⊗ p⊗ p) ψ( p , x , t )dp
Example of different orientation states and corresponding orientation tensors [1]
Where ψ(p,x,t) denote the probability of finding a fiber parallel to the orientation vector p.
Fokker-Planck equation :
∂ ψ
dt+u⋅∇ x ψ+
12
∇ p⋅( pψ)=Δ p(Dr ψ) ,
Page 7Page 7Amin Safi | TU Dortmund
Page 7
Orientation Tensors
In an Eulerian framework :
In a Lagrangian framework :
∂ Adt
+u⋅∇ A=(A⋅W−W⋅A)+λ(A⋅D+ D⋅A−2 A :D)
A ij=1N f
∑i=1
N f
pi p j
A ijkl=1N f
∑i=1
N f
pi p j pk pl
Page 8Page 8Amin Safi | TU Dortmund
Page 8
Influence of the number of fibers
The velocity gradient for the planar elongation is defined by :
Page 9Page 9Amin Safi | TU Dortmund
Page 9
Comparison between the frameworks
The velocity gradient for the planar elongation is defined by :
Comparison between a) Lagrangian simulation and (b) Eulerian approaches [1]
[1] D. Kuzmin, Planar and orthotropic closures for orientation tensors in fiber suspension flow models, July 2016
Page 10Page 10Amin Safi | TU Dortmund
Page 10
Comparison between the frameworks
The velocity gradient for the shear flow is defined by :
Comparison between a) Lagrangian simulation and (b) Eulerian approaches [1]
[1] D. Kuzmin, Planar and orthotropic closures for orientation tensors in fiber suspension flow models, July 2016
Page 11Page 11Amin Safi | TU Dortmund
Page 11
Comparison between the frameworks
3D uniaxial elongation flow :
[1] D. Kuzmin, Planar and orthotropic closures for orientation tensors in fiber suspension flow models, July 2016
3D shear flow :
Comparison between a) Lagrangian simulation and (b) Eulerian approaches [1]
Page 12Page 12Amin Safi | TU Dortmund
Page 12
Fiber-fiber interactions
An additional diffusion-like term to take the fiber-fiber interactions into account :
where Dr is a rotary diffusion coefficient.
After solving the Jeffery equation :
Fokker-Planck equation :
Page 13Page 13Amin Safi | TU Dortmund
Page 13
Fiber-fiber interactions
Wiener process (random walk) - Cartesian Approach
d = diffusion coefficient, ζ = a random number uniformely distributed between [-a,a]
The variance (strength, width or mean square displacement) of this function :
Analytical solution of the diffusion equation :
Page 14Page 14Amin Safi | TU Dortmund
Page 14
Fiber-fiber interactions
Central limit theorem : The sum of infinitely many random numbers tends toward a normal Gaussian distribution.
The random number is uniformly distributed between [-0.5,0.5]
The variance of the random walk using the Central Limit Theorem :
The diffusion coefficient :
Random walk :
Page 15Page 15Amin Safi | TU Dortmund
Page 15
Fiber-fiber interactions
Laplacian equation in the spherical coordinates :
Considering a second coordinate system :
Corresponding diffusion equation :
Page 16Page 16Amin Safi | TU Dortmund
Page 16
Fiber-fiber interactions
Quadratic angular displacement (variance) :
The small angular movement :
Since the perturbation can happen in any azimuth angle :
The coordinate transformation for finding the perturbations to be added to Jeffery equation :
Page 17Page 17Amin Safi | TU Dortmund
Page 17
Fiber-fiber interactions
Comparison between the two stochastic approaches without normalization(CI = 0.01).
Page 18Page 18Amin Safi | TU Dortmund
Page 18
Fiber-fiber interactions
Comparison between the two stochastic approaches with different interaction coefficients
Page 19Page 19Amin Safi | TU Dortmund
Page 19
Fiber-fiber interactions
Comparison between the Eulerian approaches and the Lagrangian simulations with 2000 fibers.DFC is the reference solution [1]
[1] Cintra & Tucker : Orthotropic closure approximations for flow induced fiber orientation , 1995
Page 20Page 20Amin Safi | TU Dortmund
Page 20
Two-way coupling
The momentum equation for the flow of a non-Newtonian fluid :
Brenner's theory :
A simple model to compute the non-Newtonian stress (<nnnn> is the 4th order orientation tensor) :
Page 21Page 21Amin Safi | TU Dortmund
Page 21
Having isotropic orientation tensor :
Analytical solution for the non-Newtonian stress :
Brenner's theory :
By setting r=150, and volume fraction of 1 % :
Two-way coupling
Page 22Page 22Amin Safi | TU Dortmund
Page 22
Analytical solution for channel flow :
Without Fiber
Two-way coupling – Channel flow
With Fiber Relative error : 0.15 %
Page 23Page 23Amin Safi | TU Dortmund
Page 23
Results of Manhart [1]
Stress model for fibers :
Two-way coupling – 4:1 contraction
[1] Manhart, A direct numerical simulation method for flow of Brownian fiber suspensions in complex geometries, 2013
Without Fiber
With Fiber-1%
Page 24Page 24Amin Safi | TU Dortmund
Page 24
THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION
next steps
● Validation of 3D Axisymmetric contraction with experimental data.
● Combining the Eulerian and the Lagrangian approach ?!
● More complex geometries, polymer flows, etc.