the key to scaling marketing returns 30 x k. chettayar
DESCRIPTION
Identifies key factors that drive improvements in marketing ROI.TRANSCRIPT
THE KEY TO SCALING MARKETING RETURNS 30X:
A SPECIAL REPORT FOR RETAIL AND CONSUMER GOODS MARKETERS – A LESSON FOR ALL
By Krishna Chettayar © All Rights Reserved
1
About the Author
Krishna Chettayar is currently Industry Solutions Executive for Acxiom Corporation and has over 12 years of experience in marketing and product development in the marketing services space. Prior to Acxiom, Chettayar held executive level positions at Information Resources Inc, (IRI), D&B, GE Partnership Marketing Group, and small start ups serving companies across such industry verticals as business services, information solutions, high-tech, financial services, retail and consumer goods. Chettayar was named one of the “Top 100 Marketers” by B-to-B Magazine in 2004 and is a frequent contributor to publications such as DM Review, DM News, DestinationCRM, and B-to-B Magazine. Chettayar holds a Master of Marketing from Northwestern University, a Master of Product Development from Northwestern University, a Bachelor of Arts in Marketing from California State University, Fullerton, and he is a graduate of the Executive Program at MIT for Marketing Information Technology.
2
Krishna Chettayar ©
Research into marketers needs
3
Values and Needs
Define Core Process
Budgets and Returns
Use of Process
Factors of Performance
•Define marketing process for companies in retail and consumer goods •Structure marketing process in terms of activities, process, tasks and steps
•Analyze the marketing budget and returns of companies in retail and consumer goods •Segment marketers based on return on marketing investment multiple
•Examine how high performing marketers allocate their resources versus low performers •Identify differences in allocation and determine the role of the difference in performance
Identify new solution opportunities, re-organize our solutions around core process, identify GAPS, determine what high performers do that low performers do not, share findings, collaborate with customers and prospects on findings.
•Assess key values and needs of marketers and determine how this differs by industry as well as marketing expertise •Identify new solution development areas
•Determine factors that explain the performance differential among high performers vs. low performers •Share findings with key customers to assist in driving better returns
Krishna Chettayar ©
Retail & Consumer Markets needs, value & spend survey: Completed in January of 2010, it is the second year of research.
4
RCM Needs & Spend Survey 2010 Budget growth expectations
Size of budget
Budget allocation
Needs and values
Target industries: Retail
CPG
Restaurant
Annual sales Greater than $100 million
Title and level Manager or better
120 survey responders Retail – 77
CPG – 26
Restaurant – 17
CPG21.7%
Restaurant 14.2%
Retail64.2%
RCM Industry Segments
Krishna Chettayar ©
FINDINGS
5
ROMI performance by industry: Little variance in ROMI performance across industries.
$- $2 $4 $6 $8 $10 $12 $14 $16 $18
Retail
Restaurant
Consumer Package Goods
$16
$17
$12
$15
$17
$9
Dollars Generated for Every Dollar Spent On Marketing
Industry ROMI Performance
DMA 2YR Average Third-Party Survey Est. 2YR Average
6
Krishna Chettayar ©
ROMI performance by company size: Relatively small ROMI variance across company size.
$14
$16
$10
$- $2 $4 $6 $8 $10 $12 $14 $16
Dollars Generated for Every Dollar Spent On Marketing
Large Company (≥ $2 bn)
Midsize Company (< $2 bnand ≥ $400M)
Small Company ( < $400Mand ≥ $100M)
Company Size ROMI Performance
2009
7
Krishna Chettayar ©
ROMI segmentation by performance: High Performers outperform Low Performers by 11:1.
$3
$8
$32
$- $5 $10 $15 $20 $25 $30 $35
Dollars Generated for Every Dollar Spent On Marketing
Low Performer
Average Performer
High Performer
ROMI Performance Segmentation (2010 for 2009)
Retail
High Performer $ 32.08
Average Performer $ 8.09
Low Performer $ 3.25
Restaurant
High Performer $ 34.75
Average Performer $ 8.43
Low Performer $ 3.00
CPG
High Performer $ 30.71
Average Performer $ 8.17
Low Performer $ 3.46
Note: employee size, annual sales, and industry were all equally represented across segments.
8
Krishna Chettayar ©
ROMI segments: Most segments performed worse in 2009 versus 2008 but High Performers suffered the greatest decline in return.
$3
$3
$8
$10
$32
$42
$- $5 $10 $15 $20 $25 $30 $35 $40 $45
Dollars Generated for Every Dollar Spent On Marketing
Low Performer
Average Performer
High Performer
ROMI Performance Segmentation
2009 2008
9
Krishna Chettayar ©
ROMI segment 3YR average financial performance: High Performers have greater sales and earnings growth.
Low Performer Average Performer High Performer 3 YRAverageAnnualSales
Grow th
3 YRAverageAnnual
EarningsGrow th
8.0%
19.0%
23.0%
6.0%
17.0%
21.0%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
3YR
Aver
age
Annu
al %
Gro
wth
ROMI Performance Segmentation - Sales & Earnings Growth Comparison
10
Krishna Chettayar ©
Sales performance of ROMI segments: Sales trend declined for all ROMI segments but High Performers suffered less decline than other segments.
Low Performer Average Performer High Performer 20092008
18.0%19.0%
23.0%
6.0%
17.0%
21.0%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
3YR Average Annual % Sales
Growth
ROMI Performance Segmentation - YOY Sales Growth Comparison
2009 6.0% 17.0% 21.0%2008 18.0% 19.0% 23.0%
Low Performer Average Performer High Performer
11
Krishna Chettayar ©
Earnings performance of ROMI segments: Sales and earnings trend also declined for most ROMI segments but Low Performers suffered the biggest declines.
Low Performer Average Performer High Performer 20092008
15.0%
19.0%
24.0%
8.0%
19.0%
23.0%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
3YR Average Annual % Earnings Growth
ROMI Performance Segmentation - YOY Earnings Growth Comparison
2009 8.0% 19.0% 23.0%2008 15.0% 19.0% 24.0%
Low Performer Average Performer High Performer
12
Krishna Chettayar ©
Size of marketing budgets: High Performer’s budget remained flat during 2009 while all other segments suffered small to substantial declines.
1.68%
1.93%
2.10%
2.14%
2.97%
2.96%
1.50% 1.70% 1.90% 2.10% 2.30% 2.50% 2.70% 2.90% 3.10%
Percent of Annual Sales Spent on Marketing
Low Performers
Average Performers
High Performers
Size of Budget as a % of Sales
2009 2008
13
Krishna Chettayar ©
54%
23% 23%
31%
9%
60%
22%
8%
69%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Expe
cted
Mar
ketin
g B
udge
t Cha
nge
Low Performer Average Performer High Performer
ROMI Performance Segmentation - Budget Growth Expectations
Stay the SameDecreaseIncrease
Marketing budget growth expectations: High Performers more likely to see increases in their budget for CY 2010.
14
Krishna Chettayar ©
Expected growth in marketing budget in 2010: Low performers will likely experience a small decline while High Performers will likely see modest increase in budget.
-0.5%
2.6%
6.4%
-1.0% 0.0% 1.0% 2.0% 3.0% 4.0% 5.0% 6.0% 7.0%
Weighted Growth Expectations for the Marketing Budget
Low Performer
Average Performer
High Performer
ROMI Performance Segmentation - % Budget Growth Expectations
15
Krishna Chettayar ©
final creative approval
set up loyalty system
buy media channel
set up personalization system
select target market universe
produce campaign
manage response
launch campaign
execute test & control
Marketing Activities
Prospect Acquire Retain Grow
Marketing Process
Tracking & Measurement
Market Strategy & Planning
Market & Shopper Insights
Campaign Development
Marketing Communications
conduct market research
build database
segment customers
pinpoint top opportunities
integrate data
predict behavior
develop strategy
align timeline with mfg
set budget
define segment strategy
define objectives
define segment objectives
present, review & approve
create sales forecast w/ROI
develop budget & timeline
message, offer and creative
create program brief
design in-store displays
form action plan
develop contact plan
present, review & approve
design test & control
conduct post mortem
analyze campaign results
determine next steps
track program performance
integrate learnings
Resource allocation to core marketing process varies: High Performers invest their budget and resources differently compared to others.
16
Krishna Chettayar ©
Budget allocation to marketing activities: High Performers spend more money on prospecting / acquisition and service than other segments; increased from 2008.
22% 19% 33% 26%
25% 19% 28% 29%
30% 23% 24% 23%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120%
% of Marketing Budget
Low Performer
Average Performer
High Performer
Marketing Budget Allocation to Activities
Prospecting / AcquisitionServiceRetention / LoyaltyGrowth / Cross-sell
17
Krishna Chettayar ©
Budget allocation to marketing process: High Performers spend more of their budget on forming Market Strategy and Planning and Tracking and Measurement. Low Performers spend more on campaign development and marketing communications.
18
15% 13% 25% 37% 10%
18% 16% 22% 30% 15%
16% 19% 20% 29% 16%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120%
% of Marketing Budget
Low Performer
Average Performer
High Performer
Market Budget Allocation to Process
Market and Shopper InsightsMarket Strategy and PlanningCampaign DevelopmentMarketing CommunicationsTracking and Measurement
Krishna Chettayar ©
Market and Shopper Insights: High Performers spent more resources integrating data, identifying top opportunities and building database; departure.
Key Points
High Performers
Use their existing assets (data) to drive returns.
Suggests an understanding of the valuation and return of using customer data.
Previous study they invested more heavily in segmenting and predicting behavior; suggests they are leveraging that investment.
Low Performers
Played catch up by investing in segmentation and predicting behavior.
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
20%
22%
24%
% o
f Mar
ket a
nd S
hopp
er In
sigh
ts B
udge
t
Integrate Data SegmentCustomers
Conduct MarketResearch
PredictBehavior
Identify TopOpportunities
Build Database
Marketing Budget - Market and Shopper Insights - Task Allocation
Low Performer Average Performer High Performer
19
Market Strategy and Planning: High Performers more focused on set their budget and creating sales forecast during the 2009 meltdown.
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
20%
22%
24%
26%
28%
% o
f Mar
ket S
trate
gy a
nd P
lann
ing
Bud
get
DefineObjectives
Set Budget DevelopMarketingStrategy
DefineSegment
Objectives
AlignTimelinew/Partner
Create SalesForecast
Present,Review and
Approve
Marketing Budget - Market Strategy and Planning - Task Allocation
Low Performer Average Performer High Performer
Key Points
High Performers
Focus on protecting and allocating resources to drive return.
Think like financial managers, which is a consistent theme from past year’s study.
Flexible and adaptable in utilization of resources and strategy to meet objectives.
Low Performers
Heavy focus on re-thinking or adjusting their strategy.
Shift (you can almost see it) to a direct-to-customer orientation.
20
Krishna Chettayar ©
Campaign Development: High Performers continue to focus on contact optimization, test and control, and campaign planning while Low Performers focus on message, offer and creative.
21
Key Points
High Performers
Careful to plan out an efficient contact plan – direct-to consumer.
Will emphasize a test and control approach to marketing efforts.
Review the elements of their plan and get the necessary buy off.
Low Performers
It’s all about the message, offer and creative – very tactical.
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
% o
f Cam
paig
n D
evel
opm
ent B
udge
t
FormAction Plan
CreateProgram
Brief
DevelopBudget and
Timeline
DevelopContact
Plan
Desing In-store
Displays
Message,Offer and
Create
DesignTest andControl
ReviewCampaign
andApprove
Marketing Budget - Campaign Development - Task Allocation
Low Performer Average Performer High Performer
Krishna Chettayar ©
Marketing Communications: High Performers continue to seek scale for their efforts by being selective in the audience, using loyalty systems, and using test and control strategies to learn. Low Performers primarily focused on media buys, campaign production and execution.
22
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
% o
f Mar
ketin
g C
omm
unic
atio
ns
Bud
get
Select
Target
Universe
Buy M
edia
Final C
reati
ve A
ppro
val
Produc
e Cam
paign
Set-up
Perso
naliza
tion S
ystem
Set-up
Loyalty
Sys
tem
Execu
te Tes
t and
Con
trol
Laun
ch C
ampa
ign
Manag
e resp
onse
Marketing Budget - Marketing Communications - Task Allocation
Low Performer Average Performer High Performer
Key Points High Performers
Selective with who they target their marketing efforts to.
Leverage systems and technology to build engagement and retention.
Buy media but target their buys as narrowly as possible.
Low Performers
Focus is on media buys, campaign production and launch – “got to be doing something.”
Krishna Chettayar ©
Tracking and Measurement: Low Performers more likely to focus on tracking and analysis while High Performers focus more on interpreting results.
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
% o
f Tra
ckin
g an
d M
easu
rem
ent B
udge
t
Track ProgramPerformance
Analyze CampaignResults
Conduct PostMortem
IntegrateLearnings
Determine NextSteps
Marketing Budget - Tracking and Measurement - Task Allocation
Low Performer Average Performer High Performer
Key Points
High Performers
Spend more on tracking and measurement.
Balance their analysis across all of the critical tasks.
Spend the time to determine what worked and what didn’t work and what to do next.
Low Performers
Much more time on tracking and analyzing campaigns but they don’t appear to use the insights as much.
23
Krishna Chettayar ©
Media Mix: High Performers spend more of their marketing dollars going direct-to consumer whereas Low Performers spend the majority of their marketing dollars in mass marketing or in-store efforts.
24
Direct30%
Digital Advertising
7%
Print25%
Radio6%
TV / Cable11%
In-store19%
Other2%
Direct30%
Digital Advertising
15%
Print18%
Radio4%
TV / Cable13%
In-store16%
Other5%
Direct39%
Digital Advertising
14%
Print14%
Radio5%
In-store8%
Other3%
TV / Cable 17%
Low Performer Budget Allocation By Channel
Average Performer Budget Allocation By Channel
High Performer Budget Allocation By Channel
Krishna Chettayar ©
No. Marketing Tasks Factor 1 Factor 2 Factor 3 Factor 4 Factor 5 Factor 6 Factor 7 Factor 8 Factor 9 Factor 101 Select Target Universe -0.8912 Present, Review & Approve -0.8343 Analyze Campaign Results -0.7854 Create Sales Forecast w/ROI -0.7835 Design Test & Control Groups -0.756 Review Campaign, Approve & Set Timeline -0.5577 Develop Contact Optimization Plan 0.8748 Predict Behavior 0.8359 Set-up Loyalty System 0.81310 Executve Test & Control 0.79711 Define Marketing Objectives 0.75212 Produce Campaign -0.53613 Create Program Brief 0.51214 Develop Budget & Timeline 0.46315 Launch Campaign -0.45416 Final Creative & Offer Approval 0.88117 Integrate Customer Data 0.63218 Buy Media -0.54719 Determine Next Steps 0.50020 Set Budget & Co-ordinate w/Dept 0.74821 Develop Marketing Strategy -0.70822 Track Program Performance 0.59423 Manage Response 0.86424 Set-up Personalization System 0.59425 Conduct Market Research -0.87926 Build Database 0.58327 Design Message, Offer & Creative -0.50128 Identify Top Opportunities 0.87429 Define Segment Objectives 0.49730 Form Action Plan to Support Dept. 0.83431 Conduct Post Mortem -0.44432 Segment Customers 0.87733 Align Timeline w/MFG34 Archive Results35 Design In-store Displays
Rotated Component Matrix
The key factors that drive results of High Performers: Leveraged data reduction, factor analysis, to churn through responses to identify the top factors of high performers.
Example: Avoid over analyzing and planning
25
Krishna Chettayar ©
The key factors that drive results of High Performers: Leveraged data reduction, factor analysis, to churn through responses to identify the top factors of high performers.
1. Avoid over analyzing and planning
2. Seek scale
3. Set objectives and measure
4. Personalize marketing messages
5. Manage budgets like investments
6. Focus on effectively managing customer interactions
7. Trust behavior from transaction experience, less so on the research
8. Target individuals
9. Define plans to provide support to partner functions
10. Segment customers
26
Krishna Chettayar ©
RECOMMENDATIONS
27
Employ the key factors of High Performers Help your people change. Use the 10 factors as new principles for managing the marketing efforts of your company.
1. Avoid over analyzing and planning
2. Seek scale
3. Set objectives and measure
4. Personalize marketing messages
5. Manage budgets like investments
6. Focus on effectively managing customer interactions
7. Trust behavior from transaction experience, less so on the research
8. Target individuals
9. Define plans to provide support to partner functions
10. Segment customers
28
Krishna Chettayar ©
Manage the customer life-cycle: Don’t under prospect and over retain or vice versa.
Prospect Acquire Retain Grow
ROMI Scale
Cumulative sales $ per customer segment
Average marketing $ spent for each $ generated per customer segment
$ £
¥ €
22% 19% 33% 26%
25% 19% 28% 29%
30% 23% 24% 23%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120%
% of Marketing Budget
Low Performer
Average Performer
High Performer
Marketing Budget Allocation to Activities
Prospecting / Acquisition Service Retention / Loyalty Growth / Cross-sell
29
Krishna Chettayar ©
Define and manage your marketing process: Think Six Sigma Marketing; leverage process to produce outcomes.
15% 13% 25% 37% 10%
18% 16% 22% 30% 15%
16% 19% 20% 29% 16%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120%
% of Marketing Budget
Low Performer
Average Performer
High Performer
Market Budget Allocation to Process
Market and Shopper Insights Market Strategy and Planning Campaign Development
Marketing Communications Tracking and Measurement
Key Points
• Think of marketing as a process that can be designed to produce superior outcomes.
• Define and balance your marketing process like High Performers.
• Develop a strategy with defined metrics and track results.
• Avoid the tendency to jump straight to campaign development and execution.
30
Krishna Chettayar ©
Seek scale in your marketing tasks: Focus on things that will drive higher ROMI multiples. Avoid unnecessary strategy and planning; opt for more test and learn.
High Performers Task Allocation
Key Points
• Not all marketing tasks yield the same kind of return for the time and resource investment.
• Focus your time, resource and attention on tasks that lead to higher scale in returns (e.g. build a database, develop an efficient contact plan).
• Be careful of marketing tasks that have the potential to be counter productive if done in excess.
31
Krishna Chettayar ©
Re-balance media to direct, addressable options: Greater returns, more predictable cause and effect.
Direct39%
Digital Advertising14%
Print14%
Radio5%
TV / Cable17%
In-store8%
Other3%
High Performer Media Mix Key Points
• High Performers are more likely to channel their media mix to direct, addressable channels.
• Direct, addressable channels can demonstrate a return and that attracts the High Performer.
• Do not abandon mass media but rather narrowcast your message as much as possible.
32
Krishna Chettayar ©
Beware of the Detrimental Marketing Archetypes: As we analyzed Low Performers we started to see hints of detrimental marketing archetypes lurking, some of which you may have run into in your career. These archetypes are things to avoid.
33
The Campaigner
“People, let’s get one more campaign out the door – let’s win one for the Gipper - that’ll fix it.”
The Gambler
“I’ll bet they buy more If we give this stuff away for free.”
The Big Idea Guy
“I’ve got a great idea. Let’s use a MONKEY in our promotion! Guys love animal humor. I know I do.”
The Artist
“I can’t be bothered with results. I’m trying to change the world here… Duh!”
The Adman
“We need more advertising. Let’s use stupid pet tricks to get people to LAUGH. That will drive sales.”
Krishna Chettayar ©
THANK YOU! Krishna Chettayar © 2011
34