the journal of engaged pedagogy · 2019-07-11 · p jÿ à{ ú tjournal of engaged pedagogy vol....
TRANSCRIPT
The Journal of Engaged Pedagogy
��������
Vol. 17
No. 1
�������� Engaged Pedagogy Association
V SN
T R
V SP
441
0DI C7A D .C 7 2 7 D
6DA 1D 0IC
.C 7 2 7 D D9 7 DC
441
,DE 8 .C 7 2 7 D D9 7 DC
AA J 1D E7 D 8DD 7 8
E D I9 C 7C D DI E DC C C
D .C 7 2 7 D D9 7 DC
23 1 .- 1 0 2 1
�
ISSN1349-0206
The Journal of Engaged Pedagogy
Vol. 17 No. 1
Contents
S
1 - 14
PBL 15 - 27
, ,
S 29 - 40
,
41 – 50
51- 59
,
PTA
61 - 72
.
73 - 84
Expanding Opportunities-Case Studies of Ganokendra in Bangladesh - 85 - 102
Yuko Kitamura , Nagano University
PBL - - 103 - 113
M J M
J 115 - 120
�
p Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
1
x
a
i uv w
u xu i
( i
x i xu
u
t i t i
i v i
i t
t ? Q TS 9 MLRIS
i
u
u
i
i
u i ( u w v
i xu u i i x
i
(/0 (/0, (0 , , i i
t i i
i w
u i
i i(00 i
1 ) * i ,
) i v
(00.i(000Ii (000Ji) x
x u (000 / 0
) (( n
t o
p Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
2
i i
v i i
v i
uw i i
t )
i
w u u u
i ui xu
* uv ) ( ((
x
i
non-school law
i(( (0 ) (, ,
xu ()
v i u i
w u t v i x
u i i
i i x
(00 i x i
u i
w w
u
i u
u uv i i
i
i i xu
2 i ( )
O 1 ML %QI[%RTM%NT % [ I[6TS MS 7M I QW%IW 4 L39 / -/ accessed December 10, 2017 3 x i ) (,
x4 ) ( (( (0 ( * (.**( i
( * (.**)( ) (. . ((5 xu / ( . *(
p Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
3
b
) (*
u u
t i i
t w ) ( (
i
wi
i
u
) ( 0 () () )-
*
i
v v u
6 i
i x
i
i
xi x i
i i
i
u
c x
xu (/.) i i i i u
) . i(/0, (. i
n i
u iu u xu
o t (0., (0 , i
:;
p Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
4
) () t i - i(0 0
. i
i u
(0-/ i i
) i wi
i uv ) )
i n
o n o G ) .H (0., n
i
uo (0/ i ui
i
i(0/. . */
i /
i i v
― w uv
]]
0 ]] v G ) )H i
9 1 00
9 1
9
9 i i x
(000 - )*
u
t uv i G
) (*H t ( u
t
6 t i v 7 i 8 (0// i i t uv i
uv i t r t s
i
9 x n o
10 i i
t
p Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
5
(00-H i i
i u )(
n i
i t i
x w
i u
i xu u ((
u i i
u 1
9 i
xu i
) (* i(00
i
v
i xu
v (* u w
i i xu i 2
( v wi 9 1 0
1 9 1
9 1 4
w
1
11 p ,( i xu i(0 *
.( * ,( ]G /(
http://twstudy.iis.sinica.edu.tw/twstatistic50/Edu.htm accessed December 10, 201712 i u 13 nA867 85 u
E ?DD u o
t G ) .H
���� 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
2648
885
3122
1153
2653
968
2353
868
2706
1311
2524
1283
p Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
6
Education Statistics, Ministry of Education publication 2012~2017
http://depart.moe.edu.tw/ED4500/News_Content.aspx?n=48EBDB3B9D51F2B8&sms=F78B10654B1FDBB5&s=B19A
F3B0B4D7BFAC (accessed December 10, 2017)
u i 1
1
) v u
( i i xu
)i t t i
) u v 1
1
1 0
1 u
t v
14 xu () ) v u
i u
5095
4092
2708
3666
7446
5762
7264
5609
7792
6424
7708
6973
86
87
294
306
255
290
246
270
261
300
216
306
7829
5064
6124
5152
10354
7020
9863
6747
10759
8035
10448
8562
� 12875 11249 17374 16610 18794 19010
� 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
6055 5062 4740 4221 4318 4935 4793 3918 3834 3765 3500 4467
2741 2325 2460 1859 1995 2486 2419 2094 2197 2106 1922 2237
45.27 45.93 51.90 44.04 46.20 50.37 50.47 53.25 57.30 55.94 54.91 50.08
1202 1051 861 842 873 847 816 642 578 581 568 806
19.85 20.76 18.16 19.95 20.22 17.16 17.02 16.39 15.08 15.43 16.23 18.04
876 629 679 571 561 662 619 488 414 434 406 539
p Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
7
Education Statisticsi Ministry of Education publication 2016 i (accessed
December 10, 2017)
14.47 12.43 14.32 13.53 12.99 13.41 12.91 12.46 10.80 11.53 11.60 12.07
1136 1007 865 921 856 901 906 653 590 571 549 814
18.76 19.89 18.25 21.82 13.57 18.26 18.90 16.67 15.39 15.12 15.69 18.22
100 50 30 28 33 39 32 41 55 73 55 49
1.65 0.99 0.63 0.66 0.76 0.79 0.67 1.05 1.43 1.94 1.57 1.59*
1398 1132 1028 822 813 704 587 488 482 449 434 758
201 168 155 120 140 116 92 71 88 81 75 119
14.38 14.84 15.08 14.60 17.22 16.48 15.67 14.55 18.26 18.04 17.28 15.70
1091 876 791 621 587 523 448 389 358 329 323 576
78.04 77.39 76.95 75.55 72.20 74.29 76.32 79.71 74.27 73.27 74.42 75.99
31 17 25 28 28 24 11 7 2 15 5 18
2.22 1.50 2.43 3.41 3.44 3.41 1.87 1.43 0.41 3.34 1.52 2.37
60 53 44 41 38 33 26 15 18 14 7 32
4.29 4.68 4.28 4.99 4.67 4.69 4.43 3.07 3.73 3.12 1.61 4.22
15 18 13 12 20 8 10 6 16 10 24 14
1.07 1.59 1.26 1.46 2.46 1.14 1.70 1.23 3.32 2.23 5.53 1.72*
7453 6194 5768 5043 5131 5639 5379 4406 4316 4214 3934 5225
4472 3919 3856 3503 3589 4141 3959 3317 3299 3223 2978 3660
1196 980 881 711 730 626 510 418 421 415 395 662
5668 4899 4737 4214 4319 4767 4469 3735 3720 3638 3373 4322
76.05 79.09 82.13 83.56 84.17 84.54 83.08 84.77 86.19 86.33 85.74 83.24
73.86 77.42 81.35 82.99 83.12 83.91 82.62 84.66 86.05 85.60 85.09 82.42
85.55 86.59 85.70 86.50 89.79 88.92 86.88 85.66 87.34 92.43 91.01 87.85
p Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
8
x x
* x
(
(00 i
v i
i
i
) (( v i
i
i
w ) (( (00,
i n
ox n o in (,ox n
o uv
(00,H n o
in o in
o n o
(00,H xu
u
)
1
(00/ ()
15 i
50.08%
18.04%
12.07%
18.22%
1.59%
15.7 %
75.99%
2.37%
4.22% 1.72%
p Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
9
n o
i(000 ) n
o v
v x
i uv uv u
*
4
v 9
u
) n i xu
uv
“ i “ t u
w i xu n o uv i
n oin oin o
i 1 1 0
9
1
9 i
u t
t i
ul m
i
�
2003/2 w 1999/6
2010/1 * 2011/11
2011/6 2011/7
2012/10 ) () ( i) (* -i) (* ()
2013/7
2013/5
i * -i/i0i()i( i(,
2014/9
2016/5
2014/8 () ) ( ) (0
p Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
10
x
i accessed December 10, 2017
d x
i x i u
(
u
) * *0) i ) ( ),
w ) (, i * v
i i w ) (, xu
%) i %(( i
u % ) u u u i x
t i
n o u u u
* xu i
16 http://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContentDetails.aspx?id=GL001382&KeyWordHL=(accessed December 10, 2017)
2014/11 i(0
2017/7 n
(-o *i i-i.i( i((i (,i (/ i) i)(i))
�
�
����� 937 0.06 636 0.07 78 0.02
����� 1252 0.09 403 0.05 205 0.05
����� 1508 0.12 492 0.06 264 0.03
����� 1907 0.15 641 0.08 275 0.03
���� 2408 0.20 857 0.11 195 0.02
���� 3183 0.27 1015 0.15 658 0.08
p Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
11
Education Statisticsi Ministry of Education publication 2016 i
accessed December 10, 2017
)
x i i
i i u i
u ) ( ((
i) (. . (( i
i i
I
1 i � i i i i
i i (.
“ lI i i m
i � i
i i i i
i (/i i i
i i
“
t lI i i i m
x
t
u i i
“
u lI i i i i m
x xu
u lI m
i i
g i
h i
t u i
i i …
17 u u i i i i
18
p Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
12
i i i …
I 2I i
*
u
xu i i i i
i i
t i t i i i i
i
t u
w I i ()
i) ( xu
(0 t i
i i
w
e
i
i i
u x i
x w i xu
u w i
v *
ig “ “ i i
i uv u
u i
2 9
4 9
9 9
9 9
19 u
http://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=FL030724 accessed December 10, 2017
p Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
13
9
9
1 9
9 2 1
1 1
0
4 9 4
2
1
4
9 4 1 2 1
xi
1 1
9 9 i
u
h u
u u
9 1
9
1 9 w
i v xu
u
uv i
i i n t
o u u i n o
i
t
u w
x i t xi
i u
l m(0., p ) b %),/ )-)%
p Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
14
) (* nr s o
) n x op
(0 /* 0)
) * n , op ,*
%((( () %
) () p %.. /)%
) ((n x op - ( %) ) ,%
) (* n x op -)(
%(-) (-*%
) n x op ((
%(.) (/,%
(0-/ n ] op ) %)- ,%
) .n x op = S T
CMWMI O =T SIQ (* %(*, (-0%
) . p %)* ).%
) . p %(,
(00. n x op )( %0 0-%
(000 n op ( %/. 0(
(000 n op (( %0/ ( *
) n op (/ %( )
) (( n u op - %( ) %
(000 n x op .
%(, )-%
) ) n x op
l m(00, n op
(00- n op
) (, n … o.0 65 8FFAC 7 %,) -.
”t x i
i
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
15
α
1.
Problem Based Learning Project Based Learning PBL L
PBL L L
2 PBL L L
L 3 4 PBL
L 51
2.PBL
2.1
PBL
L L
L PBL L B 2 PBL
B B
B
B L
B L
L
L
L
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
16
B
B
B
L PBL B
L B
L a) B b)
L c) L
L 1
2.2
L B
L
B c) L
L
L L
B L
B
L
L L L B
3 2.3
2.2 L B
B L
L L 1
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
17
1
L
L L
L L L
L
L L
L L
B
B
B L
L P B
L 4 L
L 2
L PBL B
L PBL 5 3.PBL
3.1 PBL
L
L B L J
203 4 2
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
18
2 J
B
2 2014
L 2016
α α
L
K CSR K CSR
L
UST
(10 2 ) J 4
4 9 10 4 910 1 2
L L L
2 3 L J
3.2
J
L P
3
L 3 L 4 3A B α C
D 2 3 UST
3
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
19
2017 10 L
4 L 2B 3
B 4 L 2 L
2
4 (2001)
student portfolio teaching portfolio6 J
4 student portfolioL L
L
B L 47 L
L
L L
B A DP
L
L
4
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
20
A
L L
L L
L
B
α L L
L
L L
L L L
L B
C
B L
J
D
L 2
4. PBL
4.1 PBL
K
NPO L L
K
L NPO
L L
L
L L
K B PBL 5
5 K PBL
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
21
1. 8
2. 2013
3. 2014
4. 2014
5. 2014 3
6. 2013 4
7. 2014
8. 2014
9. JAPAN in 2014 3
10. NPO
11. L 3
12. JC
13. The YOUNG AMERICANS in WS
4.2 PBL
K PBL
L L L L
2.2 L a B b L
c L
PBL
PBL K PBL L
L
6 1 U
5/7 9/16 10/1
L
L
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
22
L L
L B
U 5/7 10/1
L L
L L L
L
7 1 H
6/24
L B
L
L
L
L L B
H L
L L
L
N 2
L L 10B
8 2 N
5/7 10/1
L
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
23
L L L L
L
L L
L
9 3 S
7/18 9/5
L B L
B L
L L L L
L L
L B L
L B
L L
L L
S 3 K L L
L 2B L
L
1 2 L L L L 1 2 1
L 2 L
P B
L L L
4.3
K L
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
24
L B
L L L B L
9 3 S
7 1 H
B B
L
L L P
5. PBL
3
5.1
PBL SDGs ESD
2.2 PBL ( )
B
(SDGs) (ESD) 8 20152 ESD (GAP)
ESDL 2015 186 L
ESD
L PBL B PBL
L
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
25
L think globally, act locally
ESD
L
PBLB
L
9
3 PBL
PBL
L
PBL
PBL PBL B
10
10 PBL PBL
1. PBL L
2. PBL PBL
3. PBL ⇒ ⇒ ⇒ ⇒ ⇒
5.2 PBL
PBLL PBL
L L PBLL
L 3
PBL L
PBL L
PBL L B
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
26
2B L
3 B L
L 4B
L PBL
PBL L
L L
1 1 2 α 3 4 5 L 2 α 2017 2017
p.174-179 3
B L
4 L L L
B 5 L PBL
L 6 2001 p.13 7 2010
pp.75 88 L
L
L
L L p.77 8 ( ) http://www.mext.go.jp/component/a_menu/education/micro_detail/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2017/05/12/1384661_4_2.pdf 2017 12 23 9
28 3 24 http://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/shingi/chukyo/chukyo3/064/siryo/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2016/05/23/1370879_5_1.pdf 2017 12 23
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
27
PBL L L
L
B
�
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
29
e w
7 8 ji
v
he j d
s i j o e j s e (
M u f ei j g i j i
jei g f u e ij s k ef jd
u j s h fu
m u em u s e
ef jd s
u e e i s jd
u j u d g
u ( u u
( ( u ef
g w u e
h he u d
e f i ef j f
fu g g em j e
d w
u j i k
u fu i j s e
i w d k w d
x j d u
j v i w d v
w iw j k e i
ji i ho
j m i
u e w i g m f
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
30
d k e w
#
o u w
d ( M .. / u o w
j m u jd ( M .. /
u j s em d
s u m
( M . /
f w e u j 7
d Yj o
v n d ef u
u u e e j d
e u h f
C H M U E DU C H B B
JJ B B e g j k /// M / u Y
u e ( M ( w
j f k ki f ki j e i d e
j i e Y i o u m d
/// M u j w d
j e w
u s Y e
i u j g
( - M ( ef ef f
e /// M - w
s j u g e j g
s d d s g j u
d ef u d j w
u e u d g i
f o w
g ef o ( - M
j s d //.
M /, f ef s s d
g u ef ho d
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
31
w w d /// M )-
f v m w d
/// M . v u w d //. M /,
m ef i u
j d ef e ek e
g d i e w j
#( i
ef
d ( gx f w ef /// M -
j g j k e w
j d e d
ef Y k d ef jd ///
M , j e /// M ,
u j j s k d ef
/// M , j k j v k
k w e w ( - M ),
g e u o e d f
ef jd j k e u k
n i u o e d j
u u f //. M (, p e
s d i s ue
g w d /// M - - f
u w e w u
n dp e /// M ,- ) )-
( - M ef j w f d
j w e ef ///
M ) )
f j s e j
u u s u e ( ) u
e k s k f w i
f o dpx e e v
ef jd u e ( ) M .,
o f w w p e f w w e
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
32
u w
g j k f i j j
s w ef u i v
u k g j o i
u e m ef u o d
w d k m g e e ( -
M / (, m e g //. M (- (.
/// M ) ( - M - wn
w //. M . e i
u d
( i
k i e u
w ef d l
u j i ji u i
um ek e e e r
v e i
j n w o ( -
M )) u g y e e f
( ) o u
g /-/ e u k
k ej i o k kx m e w ef
d w ( ) M (( u o u
e u u j s j s m
ho w ( ) M ()/ ( ( g
u v w i i
w f w w e d s
s d ef ej m
e j d j f (
w ( ) M ( (
u
d
u ( p
ef f
ef
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
33
u d ( M ,(
u w
/,/ M -
u u k /-/ M . /
mu k k e uiu k e
/-/ M - u u u g m j
e u em g Yue u m
e j e he u e
k e f ( - M , d e m e
e d e jd f e j k h
e u em j k ( - M , u l
u o e ( ) M ( ) o
j u d ( ) M ( ) uiu io m k
u u em j s m w u
u w u em d
( l e
w k f i j k e
d s e p /,. M (
f k he m s em
d m d iv k e u f ho
/,/ M / k g g
i p i sy w kx he
w ef ( - M ,, f
w ( - M ,- i f u e
/,/ M (, g he w ef j
d j m j u e d u
o ef d /,. M f
/, M - j m
f e ( - M . # .
f e w j ef d
i s e ef h k k u
w w ef ef j u u
e m j k g i ef e w
g u u w d w he
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
34
s d
) ho i
f fi p j
f d i j e w v
e k k u j w e
j w ex j u h
o d 1j u e d
i d u e j i
we f k 2 1 u E e w
u
)#
)# #
( 1 2 j u
e d ( - , d j
u u w u e u 1
e e ef u 1 x
f 2 g d
d j m j k i 1 j g
1
e u
e e j e
x
j e
j j k
( m1
d s
e i d
)# #(
1 w u u e j (0
( ho i
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
35
g e u em d . u
e u h ef e uiu 2
u e d 1 2 i eio k io w
e 12 u j
k g f / 2 eio w 1 f 1
u e e 2 eio e j eio 1 d
f ef 2 / eio 1
w g Y k w f e d 1
j m e m e wl
x 1 g d g e i uiu ,# . ( #() 2
i wm w Y j s em fu w
m y f u i u ,#.
u ( #() w u o e
i k k k u wme p u
em ef j1 1 u e e2 k e
2 u f w 1 j e i j d
d e u j //, M ( ) u e j f
g
f m 2 / eio ej 1 e p
io e ef j i 2 k e e 1 j f v e i
ef i 1 p f u e s
io y f d 1 2 j
l f u e 2 eio 1 2 j w j k
g em u 2 pio 1 e
g w u 1 g
p e
)#( (
)#(#
( 1345 2
j u e d ( d
j u
u w d iv u e u 1
ef u 1 x f
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
36
g ( u k io k
k e
)
m1 d
s e i
d
( (
e e b c
j u
d u
j s
u 1
j i we f e
)#(#(
( 1 w u u e j )0 (
g e e u em d (
1 e u
h u u k j pio g
j e u )0 ( j m
o j m sy e
x f 5j 1 u pio o 1
e wn u e d 1 j e w
. / u e . 34 / 23 1 i o s e
/ 1 i 1 m w j
s e u e j g uiu 5 e
m 1 g e f d 1 j e u d
1 e ef i m u e d
e i g i ef
1 j e o u j w u e
j i j ( ue j j
i j m e 2
e t m d - eio 2 e 1
) ( ho i
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
37
m s e
w ki g e fu
k o j 1 wme p em
f 1 j u e e k o u k e
f u e f k d j
u w k e jd
e d e 1 k j u v
em f e u em Y d
)#(#)
f he 1 j w w
k u w eio u m e jd
e e j s i j
k e m f wme p k k
u u em j k i fu
d
e k i eio 1 em f
e d w jd d j
s e e u f u o
e ejox i ej u f d g i
f f d f k e i
o /-/ M .. w /-/ M /.
e e k k u /-/ M ( j o
x i e k eioj e
m j g e wme p
w e
j w //. M /, he
/,/ M ( ( - M ,- d u
e i j eeig k f
ig
ji i e v k i
e w
p d j i ( u
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
38
fu j s e u f i
j i fid e s f i fi w
e j f u e i ef x
em j o j e f
j h /-/ M (
km e e k i fi d
f d i f e f
k e fi ef m
u g k d m k jd
//) w w o e e
w w w f d
//) M (,, e d m
ho d d e em d
f m w k e fi u u m
e i f j
em f ef g
u w j
a
e e w g i d
w e w m u
e g m e ( - M (
( /// M - , u mi fi
u w p e /// M - ) w ef d
g d e w ef f d j u
d //. M (,
) i u e d g i f f ef ( - M - Y
e fe emi fi w f w o e
k s f f ui w f j
//. M . j f w d //. M ,(
s /// MM -(#-)
ef j d ef //. M (
g e d ii e g e v e eu e
g e e v e e d
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
39
a
2N BN 7 /., ,: 3 J N ADB0 6 N NA BN PU :NB //.
wx
2N BN 7 // ,: 3 J N ADB0 6 N NA BN PU :NB ///
o
2N BN 7 //, , : , : 3 J N ADB0 6 N NA BN PU :NB (
ef
2N BN 7 ( ) : : : B 3 J N ADB0 6 N NA BN PU :NB ( -
w
7 //) u wx
2 BN 8 /- 9BS NH
2 BN 8 ( : 8 NP : E D
8 /, i
8 /,. ( wx MM .-# -
8 /,/ wx MM #(,
8 /,/ wx MM -#-
8 /,/ f wx MM -,#
8 /-/
8 /-/
(
( w MM () #(
( ) u f
MM .)#(
( ho m uh
(
//
( ho e
MM # EPPM0 PBN B /, M EPJ J U
( u k m ef m uh
//, MM /)#( -
( ) j e
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
40
MM ( )#( -
( - io
7 - . ( )
41
l 0
2011 3 11 1 o 1
1 8 1
2 1 1
2 5 G 2 1
1 1
5 2 1
1 o
1 1 2
1 1
2
1 1 1G
2 1 5 1
1 1 V o 1NPO
G G 2 (2013) 1
1 5 5 5
2 5 1 o ,
2 1
V 5 G 2 1
2013 1 1 G 5
G 8 2 1 1
1 1 o
8 1 G O G 8 22 1
1 1 o
2O 1 1 G 5
l1 l
1 2010 o 2010 2 1 (2012)
7 - . ( )
42
r
r
×
1 7 7
2 ( 9 7
2 9 9
2 9 9
/ ) 9 7
2
1 1995 5
2 5 1 I THEY
1 l YOU 5 8
2 8 I 8 YOU 7
5 8 1YOU 8 THEY
5 2 2016 1 1
1 5 2 1
o 8 8 1 5
o 2 1 THEY
l 1 2 1
1 YOU O
2
1
8 2 1
2 1 8 2
o
8 2 2008 1 G
1
5 8 1
5 8 2
2014 4 2016 3
2 1 o
2 1
1 2
2 1
2
7 - . ( )
43
1 8 2 1 1 1600 1
4500 2 29 8
1 o 1 G 2
1 1 1600 1180 2
1 o 9 14 1 8
1 G 2O 1 S 1T 1K 3 G
1 2T 407 3 G 1
2 1T-1 1 2 1
l1 V 8 2T-2 T-3
G 1T-1 G 2K 1
35 33 G 2
1 8 2 1
10 G 2 2 1
o o 1 1970
G 8 2
4 9 2 12011
8 2 5 6 1 l1
G 2 1 G 4 1
1 1 2
60 80 8 170
l 2O l1 1 2
1 2 1
G 8 2 1 o 1 1
8 8 1 o 8 2 1
8 2 1
(Gr1oGr9) 8 1
8 2
8 2 5 1 3 8
o 2 3 5 1
1 2G 1 5
6 G 1 8 2 1
G 1 8 2
1 5 G 2 1
7 - . ( )
44
1 8 1 8 2 8
1 o 1 1 8 2O
1 1
2 1 5
1T-3 G 2( Gr2) 2 r T
G
Gr2 1 2 2 1T-3
SG 1O
.5364
.5 S 2 × 7 7
.5 S 2 99
.5 -2 8
29 9
.5( r 99
.5) Sp ) 2 u 9 9
.5S
00( 2 9 7
.5 2 9 7
.5 S ( 2 9 7
.5- 2 7 7
.5 / 99
7 - . ( )
45
2 5 120
2 1
8 2
N l 2 1
2 1 1G o
G 2 SG 111 9 T-1
2SG 1 8 1
2 1
2 12 1T-1 1T-3
2O HG 8 2O 111 G
SG Gr2 2HG 1 O
1 1
5 2H G 1 2
H G
1 2
200 1 G 2HG 11 30
2O 1HG Gr2
G 2
o 8 2HG
1 2 1
8 1 G o 8 1
l 2G 1 8 l1SG
1 o G 2
8 1 2
2 1
1SG 1 5 2G 1
1 5 8
2 1HG 1Gr1 1
o 8 2Gr5 1
2
2016 1 1 o
G 1O G 2 1
2013 1 8 1
2Gr2 1 O
7 - . ( )
46
1 1G G 1
2
O 1O 1 5 SG Gr2
2 2016 1Gr2
1 G 2 8 SG
1 S
G 2
1 G 1 5 G
G 8 2SG 5 o 8 1
NPO o 1 8
2 o 8 2 1
2 1
8 1 l
2 1
2 1Gr2 1 5
1 5 8 2
K
G 1 SG Gr2
2 S G 8 Y G 8 2Y G Z
1 1
G 2 SG
Gr2 8 2 12015 5o 1
1 1Gr2 G 2 12013 Z
1 G 2
o 1Z G
Gr2 5 8 2 1
8 1Gr2 2
V 5o 1
G 2Gr3oGr5 1
2 1 Gr2
G 1 l 5 2O
l1YG Z G G
1Gr2 T-3 o
G 2HG 1Gr2 2
7 - . ( )
47
8 1 1
G1 8 1 o 2 3
1 1 o 1
2
5 1 o
8 2 1HG
2Gr2 1 1
5 2
1Gr2 1YG l1
o 1 22013 1
Gr2 800 1 2
1
2G 1 G 1Gr2
2 1G
1 Z 2 1
Gr2 1 5
2
5 1 5 5
2 12015 5 YG 5
G G 2Z l
G 1100 2 1Gr2 1
Gr2 G 2 1
1 8 2YG 1
Gr2 5 2
1 1Gr2 Z G 2
Gr2 1
2 Z 1 8 8 1
2 Gr2 1 O
5
8 2O 1 1
2 O 2 8 l l
l 1 2
7 - . ( )
48
O o o 1 5
8 2
Z O Gr2 5 1Gr2
Z 1 G
2 1Gr2 Z
1 G 2 1 5
8 2Gr2 Z 5 1
5 2
G P o
1Z G o
2O G 7 8 2 1 1
G 7 8 1
28 12015 o G 7
5 2 1 1
2 1 Z 1
1O 2
1 G
2 SG oYG 1
o G 2 5
Z 1 o 1 1
1 8 5 G
2
1 1 2SG
8 Z 2 1 o
8 1 2 G 2S
G 2 1YG G
2 1 1YG
80 8 G 1
1 5 1 YG
8 2 10 YG Z o
2 1
5oO 8 2
P
7 - . ( )
49
1 G 5 l1
2 2016 1 1G
1 2O 1
1 G 1 5YOU
1 o 2 1
YOU G 2
1SG oYG o 8
2 1 THEY 5 8 2
1 1 5 1
5 2 1THEY YOU
l 8 2
1996 1YOU 1I YOU 1
1THEY l 8 1YOU
1 THEY l 5
8 2Gr2 1SG
2 1
5 8 1 G
8 8 2 1Gr2 YG THEY
G 2YG 1
Gr2 G 2YG 5
o l THEY 2Gr2
YG THEY 2 1
5 V l 2 5
1 Gr2 2 G
1 5 l G 2
1 5 G 5 G
2 1 1 o
2 1 1
2
1 1SG oYG 5
2 1 5
1 Gr2
G 2 1 1 G
2 1I YOU l THEY
7 - . ( )
50
5 1O 2
1 1 5 5 1
8 5 V 2O 1 1
1 o
2 1 o 1
l 2 G 8 1
1 2 1O
2
1 V 2
2
1) (2013) 0 NO 7
2) (2013) 08 05778 1 pp57-80
3) (2010) 0 57
4) (2010) 1 57
5) 2008 0 057 16 19
A p67-104 6) , , (2016) 0
05 7No.8,pp1-12 7) , , (2013)
V 5 7Vol.64,No.8,pp429-442 8) (1995) 7 9) (2012) 5
CAMPANA7No.19,pp49-64 10) 2016 l 5
�
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
51
� , 2
1990 , Wertsch 1991 2 , ,
0 Lave & Wenger 1991 Rogoff 1990
, SLA
, , , 2
Firth & Wagner 1997 ,
Young 2008
IC 2 , SLA ,
, 0 ,
, , ,
2 IC
2,
2017 0 ,
2 , 2017, p.9 ,
1 2 CAN-DO
, , ,5
, ,
0 , , 0 11
1 ,
0 1 2 ,
, , 1 2 1 1
, 2001, p.192 2
, 2 , 0 ,
2
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
52
SLA , 1
, 5, 2
Ellis, 2008, p.521 , , SLA ,
SLA 2 2, Firth &
Wagner , 2 5, SLA
1 2 ,
, , [teacher talk] [learner language] ,
, 0
, , 2014, p.74
2 1 2 ,
1 , ,
, p.78 , , 5
1 , , Vygotsky
, SLA 0
IC , , 1
, ,
2.
2.1. Vygotsky0 Bakhtin Wertsch 1991, 1998
, 1
cultural tools , ,
mediational means , , , , ,
individual(s)- acting-with-mediational-means
2
irreducible tension , , 2002, p.26 , ,
units of analysis Wertsch ,
,
,
, , 1 1
2 2, 2
, , 5 ,
1
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
53
1 2 1 5 1 2
, ,
, , 0 2
, , 2002, pp.26-50,
, , ,
, , 5, 2
1 1,
,
1 1 , , ZPD
,
2.2.
ZPD , ,
, 5
, 2001, p.298 0 ,
, , ZPD 5 ,
ZPD 0 ,
, 2002, p.60 5,
2007 , ZPD , 2007,
p.21
, , I 2 ,
YOU 2 THEY I 2 YOU
, 1 5 ,
, I , ZPD YOU
0 ,
, 5, 2 , ,
, , 2 2
5, 2 , 2
1 p.34 2 I
, YOU 2 THEY , 5
1 1 I 2
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
54
, , p.29
, THEY YOU
3.
3.1 IC Young (2008, p.101) , IC
, ,
, , , ,
, , ,
, p.71 , Vygotsky
Vygotsky , Young ,
, , ,
,
, ,
, ,
, , , ,
, ,
, ,
,
, , ,
,
, ,
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
55
, , 2
, , , 2,
, , ,
2 ,
, 0 , ,
2 0 1
3.2.
Ohashi 2013) , 201
Rogoff 1990 , 3
2 , 1
2 2 touch game , 1
2 2 storytelling ,
,
2 2, 2 touch game , 2
, 2 1
0 / 1 storytelling ,
, , 2
2 , , 1 2
2
1 , , I ,
, ZPD 2 YOU
2 1 ,
2 5 2
, , 0
,
0 2015 IC 0 2
2
5 2
2
2015
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
56
5 2 5
2 2
p.7 0 ,
IC , 0 , , ,
IC
0 2,
, 2009 ,
, , 1 ,
2, ,
( , 2009, pp.10-11) 2 5
2 , p.21 2 , , , 2,
,
, p.27 2 ,
, 2,
2 , , ,
2 , 2
2
2 ,
, ,
, 0
, i 5 , , Helot 2014) ,
2 ,
, 2 ,
2 2 5 ,
, 2 , , 1 5,
2
,
1 , ,
, , 5
Lotherington 2014) 0
, ,
, 2
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
57
, 2
2016 ,
5, , 1
6 , 2
ii, ,
, , , , , , iii
4 0
SLA 0 2,
, /
2 , , , 1 ,
, , ,
,
2 , 1
, 0
,
,
2 , ,
1 , , , 2 1
, , , ,
2 ,
5, 2
, 2 , 5, 0
, 2 1
, 1 1 2 5 1 ,
2, , ,
2 1 ,
5,
5 ,
, ,
,
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
58
2 ,
i 2016 , Beacco et Byram, 2003/2007, p.8 1
2 , , , ,
ii 2010 Banks, J.A., 2001,p.303 , 0 p.57
iii B2011~2013 , 23330245
1
http://www.waseda.jp/prj-tagengo2013/blog/html/pages/gaiyou.html
2001
, 189-200.
2015 0
2016 5 5 0
2007 1
J.V. , 2002
, 2009 2014 0
28 . 69-82.
2015
No.83. . 3-9.
2017 2010
Vol. 16. 57-66.
2001
Banks, J.A. 2001 .Cultural Diversity and Education: Foundation, Curriculum, and Teaching,
Boston, Allyn and Bacon. Beacco, J.-C. et Byram, M.S. 2003/2007 . Guide for the development of language education
policies in Europe: From linguistic diversity to pluralingual education. Strasbourg, Council
of Europe.
Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford U. Pr.
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
59
Firth, A. and J. Wagner. 1997 . On Discourse, Communication, and (some) Fundamental
Concepts in SLA Research. Modern Language Journal, 81/3, 285-300.
Hélot, C. (2011) Children’s Literature in the Multilingual Classroom. Developing Multilingual
Literacy Acquisition, Hélot, C. & Ó Laoire, M. (eds.) : Language Policy for the Multilingual
Classroom: Pedagogy of the Possible. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. Springer, Bristol.
42-64.
Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation.
Cambridge: Cambridge
Lotherington,H.(2014).DIY pluralingual literature, Hélot,C.& Sneddon,R.& Daly,N. (eds.)
Children's Literature in Multilingual Classrooms: From Multiliteracy to Multimodality :
IOE Pr., London.84-103.
Ohashi, Y. (2013). Linguistic participation as a manifestation of second language learning in
the primary L2 classroom, Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. Vol 7, No.1,
19-39.
Rogoff , B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New
York: Oxford U. Pr.
Vygotsky, L.S.(1978).Mind in society. Cambridge, Mass.:M.I.T.Pr.
Wertsch, J. (1991).Voices of the Mind A sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action. Harvard
U.Pr., Cambridge, Mass.:MIT. Pr.
Wertsch, J. (1998).Mind as Action. New York: Oxford U. Pr.
Young , R. (2008). Language and Interaction an advanced resource book. Routledge Applied
Linguistics.
�
P Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
61
231uV] r
r u bp
%
% %
uV] 231x rb
t[t ux u r
a V u
V px 231x e u c p b b 231x r
ru bp 231
[ r p x u o u T
%(% 573
231 un px ru b b u
r ux x
a [ t[t Tt u
]p x % % u 231 r ubpV
t cp u 231 nn kb
[ uV px rx b[ 231
a t t t a
p
%)% 573
Tt231 uV p rbp t p
rx un p %%- x 231 ]rbp ut
t b 231 t u u b
rt Tt eb ur p t %%- ,. r
bp .-- ( x 231x rbp
p rbp r b %
231 rb 231 p
231 n t u b
P Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
62
%%( - % x231 uV p u u t
n t u t
t a bp % 231
ux u t rbp u 231x xet u
rbpx u ua p r u
u ua urp b ] r r T bp
% , x T 231 c % , ,
231 tat u bpx Tt % ,
r p r bp % , x Tt231 rb
p r bp
231 n r un px r u
p t p u a p b b 231 uV] r
u u b n u b x bt
%*%
x rbp b rbnn
t u u t u
%% ) ) %% () x r bp r
T [ n b b x u
a r a bp un p r
u a ta p %%
u p t u
rt r p %%, (% uV p 231x
u rbp a p %%, x r
% rb 0 -) b
231t uV] (-
rbpx , ( )
. . ( r bp rbp
rx u rx r
x ta x ka p
u p a r r t p
xa [t %%, (% r r
Tt rx u u
p P uV] r %%- x
P Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
63
ux x u u x u T %% r
rbp uV] r
u l u r rb b
%% t a p
u l r u bp 4 8 87 %%% x u x
x r u 9= A
ux t l : ux
t lT r bp 4 8 87 %%% %. %% )) x
u bp p tgt 231 uV px [
u u a a n t r rbp e 231
u b u u a r T
r t rt p r
x u % x t
u p rt p
x a p t t t
% %
x 231 u n T 231 x u a
xt[ 231 u x r a ux u
u b b t u x u
b r
t n x 231 uV]
[t
t n x 231 uV]
[t
x n un p 231 bp
x n 231 u
r T bp
cp T un p 231 r 231
bp T bp r u Tt
n un p r
(% S
P Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
64
(% %
% u b x u
231 rb x
u
u b u p 231
rb 231u u
t u t p
x u rbp u
u bp u u p
u ). -
% 573 , D )
A < T
> .
(% A S
T
> * .
)% 573 ( ] (
T
>() )
= ) D -
) S D
x - u rt
n n
=*%( -% ))%- ,% -%. % )% %*
1 *,% %, )(%, -% .%. ,%( (%- %
=A ( (,(- * -
x r bp
] b b u rx
t rbpx % , u
un p b Tt n
r bp r T 231un px bt
r T (
P Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
65
r
1 *
) % * %)
-(,%* ( , *%- )
--% * ).% -
( A [
-
( (- A D
)A( 1 A( ) 1( A) * 1)
A* 1* A - 1, A-
1. A 1
* (- A [
un px % u % ut r
b (. u b x)% ( r t xt
xt r t r un px %
% . r x % , ) u b
%) , r , b b x . %%
%% b u u
% x u a p n t
u u p ]
r b r t
x % ,, u b x(- %, r
% bp un px b
p r a p x 0()% r 0 %. u
]p T
(%(%
r x u p T
rbp un p un px t a
x rbp u p
bp u un p u o[ T
ux rbp 5 6 56 x
x 231 ux tbu bp un
u T T [ T t rbp u b
P Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
66
u x rbp 5 6 x
x231 r c 5 6r u b
64
)* )% %
( )%-, % .
64
)* )% ) % .
( )% ) % )
x rt rbpx
a p t Tl x 231 a r
t u b un px rbp T
un px5 6 un px5 6 rbp un px
r x 5 6rbp
x n u u
i 5 65 6rbp un px 231
uV p b b u [t p
5 6rbp
64
)* ( ,) * %)* *% .
) * , (% - ( *%(,
)* % %
D )* % %(
D )* % %
)* % , %(
( (( ,) * %(( %-,
%* ( %*
( % %)
D ( % * %
D ( % ( % *
( % * %(
)%
)% %
5 6 rb u x
P Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
67
b rb x e xt
rb x 5 6
un p 5 6u 5 6 b
un p u [t p u 231
ux tbu bp r T [t r x u
5 6 rb
"���"
" "���"
"
"3" 0"
" "3" 0"
"���"
" " " " " " " " "��!" ()%" $&,*"
" "'%." $%(," "
"� �" (&)" $%**"
" "&.*" $%')" "
"
" " " " " " " " " "
"3" 12" 0"
" "3" 12" 0"
" ���"
" " " " " " " " "����89:" ()%" &" $()("
" "'%." &" &$,'("
"���7689:" ()%" &" $(++"
" "'%." &" $(')"
"���7689:" ()%" &" $'*%"
" "'%." &" $-+%"
"������89:" ()%" &" $+%%"
" "'%." &" *$(%," #"
#4"/$%*"" " " " " " " " "
)%(% (
5 6 rb u x
b rb x 5 65 65
6 ( un px5 6
P Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
68
5 6 rb
"���"
" "���"
"
"3" 0"
" "3" 0"
"���"
" " " " " " " " "��!" ()%" ,$,,*" ##"
"'%." $&,'" "
"� �" (&)" $,(("
" "&.*" $%%*" "
"
" " " " " " " " " "
"3" 12" 0"
" "3" 12" 0"
" ���"
" " " " " " " " "����89:" ()%" &" $+,%"
" "'%." &" $(+("
"���7689:" ()%" &" $%,'"
" "'%." &" $(++"
"���7689:" ()%" &" &&$*'*" ###" '%." &" $%%)"
"������89:" ()%" &" &,$,((" ###" '%." &" *$%%(" #"
#4"/$%*" ##4"/$%&" ###4"/$%%&"" " " " " " "
u (n rt un p 5 6 5
6 5 65 6 r
5 6 bp 5 65
6x e
5 6 rb
"���"
"
"3" 12" 0"
"��"
" " " "��!"
"5" ,$)-(" ##"
���"" " " "
���7689:" ()%" &" ,$')-" ##"
������89:" ()%" &" &($%'&" ###"
##4"/$%&" ###4"/$%%&"" " " "
e un p 5 6u 5
6 b un p u
[t p u x 231 r c [t
r un p 5 6r u 5
6 5 6 0)% () uV] u
b b un p u
rr u [t p rx e x
231 r c n r
x u
P Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
69
*%
*% %
uV] n t l t
n x 231 uV] [t r
t n x 231 uV] [t x
e u a u un px r u 5
6 rt r t[r un px
231 r u rt T bp
*%(% 8 9 PD
x tg u5 6 t
l T rbpx 231 bp r
P Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
70
uV] 231 x r u ]p
t x
u p t r b b x r r
p u u bpx
u p t 231 xt[p u [t
t
Tt x a t rx t [ t
b Tt bp
r a
*%)% PD
5 6 r un px r 5
6 a 5 6r 5
6x uV p x a t 5 6
un px rt r a
T u 231 c [ rbp5 6u [ b
r
% S
u p u [t n u
r b a t x 231
uV] u [
t n x eb t p t b b u
[t n ] rx u[ 231
r r 231 p [
x T
u pV[ e ux
t u un px ] r b
un p t p u p a x
u T n x u
231 x t[ a ux
t u e rb
P Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
71
0 2( ) u u b r ] x2010 4
pu 22 PTA un p
b PTA r r ub
2012
( ) x t PTA a u b ]
PTAx PTA t r p SYNODOS t at u
2013 6 24 https://synodos.jp/intro/4633/4 201712 21
( ) AERA 2014 3 3 PTA t u a t pp.36-38.
( ) u b x rx t
u rbp 2008:108 x uV p uV]
a p r u ] u [
t r uV] x uV]
b uV] [t b ] bp
( ) PTAu r x b[
u a p x b
( ) ux c r lu t r ] x
t x a un p r
n r ] 0 2
Vobruba, G. 2000 Actors in Processes of Inclusion and Exclusion: Towards a Dynamic
Approach , Social Policy & Administration 34(5), pp.601-613.
2007 uV] r 43(1)
pp.27-40.
2008 u r
P uV] r pp.51-74.
2017 r r
r .
2008 P t .
2017 PPTA r T .
2012 PTA u t b ua
(2) pp.65-80.
1988 PPTA .
2011 PTA : r : r PTA
P Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
72
17514 .
2003 x r P ux t
pp.112-125.
2008 PTA u u
(2) pp.165-181.
2008 xc u P uV] r pp.5-13.
l 2006 r EU
(50) pp.144-158.
2006 EU r (50)
pp.34-46.
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
73
1.
1.1
2000
2004
GPi 2013 COC
ii
iii 2015
16 15 55
COC COC
[cf. 1999; 2005;
2011; 2011]
2014 0 2015
5 2016 13 iv 2017 COCv
good practice
COC
engaged vi
COC 2017
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
74
COC
1.2
[cf. 2017; 2017]
PDCA
COC vii
PDCA
Plan
[ 2017:8, 16-17]viii
2.
2.1
[ 1999:9]
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
75
refactoring
[ 1999:9]ix
x
[
1999:17]
2.2
1
[ 1999:17, 22]
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
76
xi SDLM xii
[ 1999:22-23]
[ 1999:24-32]
1. 3
2
[ 1999:34]
IT
1
1 . 6
�
�
�
�
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
77
� IT IT
�
[ 1999:39-43]
3
[ 1999:43]
xiii [ 1999:51-58]
1
2
2. SDLM
PM CIO
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
78
2
PM
PM CIO
CIO
2. SDLM
SDLM
PM
PM
IT PM CIO
CIO
[ 1999:38]
PM
2.3
3
3
16 11 14
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
79
3 . 3
16
11
14
(1999 www.antipatterns.com xiv
3.
3
xv xvi
xvii
3xviii
3.1
[cf.
2017]
[ 2017:20]
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
80
3.2
[ 1999:165] IT
3.3 SWOT xix
[ 1999:139]
[ 1999:141-142]
3.4
[ 1999:150-151]
3.5
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
81
1
[ 1999:117]
[ 1999:114]
3.6 xx PBL
[ 1999:97]
COC
1
3.7
xxi IT
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
82
PM
4.
W. R. C. H. W. �. T. J. 1999
2011������ ��������������������
2017 42
2017 PDCA
pp.3-22
2015 MBA [ ] 50
2017
1:17-25
2017
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
83
23:102-103
2005
1999
SYSTEMS 2009 IT
BP
2017
9:302-305
T. M. B. P. 2004 EJB
BP
2014 pp.3-18
2011 ���������������������
�����
i http://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/koutou/kaikaku/gp/004.htm 2017/12/21 ii (2013) p.9 iii iv http://www.highedu.kyoto-u.ac.jp/forum/2017/ 2017/12/21
v 24https://www.highedu.kyoto-u.ac.jp/forum/2016/pdf/program_final.pdf 2017/12/25
24 16 vi ”engaged” [
2014:10-11] vii 2016 S: �� 7 A:���������� 40 B:������������������������������������23 C:��������������� �� 6����� viii PDCA
PDCA[ 2017:4]
ix W. [ 2017: 238-247]
x
xi primal forces
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
84
xii Software Design-Level Model xiii 4
[ 1999:46]
xiv 2004 SYSTEMS 2009 xv xvi
xvii
xviii
[ 1999:75]
xix SWOT Strengths Weaknesses Opportunities ThreatsSWOT
[ 2015:62] xx ”The Blob”
xxi
http://www.softpanorama.org/Skeptics/cargo_cult_programming.shtml 2017/12/25
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
85
Expanding Opportunities - Case Studies of Ganokendra in Bangladesh -
Yuko Kitamura
Nagano University
Introduction
Education is significant in the development of all countries and Bangladesh is no exception. The government of
Bangladesh enacted compulsory education in 1990 and attaches a high priority to developing primary education.
However alongside this, NGOs have also tried to expand educational opportunities for all people, including
adults, and such challenges took me to the country to research Ganokendra (CLC: Community Learning
Centre) for more than a decade. This research focuses on the contributions of Ganokendra in terms of
improving people’s quality of life through encouraging them to take control over their own destinies.
Undertaking the research using the qualitative method allowed me to better understand both the subjects and
community-based educational development at the grass-roots level. Therefore, this research is crucial in order to
reveal the role of social and educational development from the community’s point of view. In this paper, firstly
the school system in Bangladesh will be briefly described and then an overview of a NGO’s non-formal
education program in Ganokendra will be presented. Following these, information about the field of research
will be explained. Finally, how the core concept of ‘taking control’ emerged will be clarified.
The Bangladeshi School System
Bangladesh has two types of basic education, formal and non-formal education. Formal education consists of
five years at primary level, three years at the secondary level, and two years at the higher secondary level.
Higher education comprising of different areas of specialisation over two-five year courses is also practised-
(Chandra, 2003; Rahman, 2002). Finally, Islamic education such as madrasah education, is also considered
formal education (Chandra, 2003).
Non-formal education1 is common and many NGOs work in the sector. Non-formal education covers people
of various ages; for instance, there are non-formal primary schools, adolescent programs, adult literacy
programs, skill training, social awareness programs and income-generating activities. Non-formal education
programs significantly contribute to increasing literacy rates and providing education for out-of-school children,
as well as adults. The government also acknowledges the importance of non-formal education and established
the Directorate of Non-Formal Education (DNFE) in 1996 to support non-formal education projects. It set a
goal to increase the literacy rate to 90 percent by 2020 (Ali & Jeria, 2000:37). According to the Human
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
86
Development Report 2016 (UNDP, 2016), the Adult literacy rate (15 years old and older) is 61.5%, the primary
school dropout rate 33.8% and the number of those with at least some secondary education (ages 25 and older)
comprises of 42% of females and 44.3% of males. Non-formal education plays a crucial role to provide
educational opportunities, especially to those who miss out on formal education.
Overview of DAM’s Non-Formal Education Program
Dhaka Ahsania Mission (DAM) was a pioneer in establishing NGOs as non-formal education providers in
Bangladesh. Established in 1958, DAM also focuses on providing people better livelihoods, health, human
rights and social justice (DAM, 2009). Ganokendra (Community Learning Centers) have played crucial roles in
achieving DAM’s objectives.
DAM also began offering non-formal education programs in 1981 and Continuing Education for neo-literates
in the 1990s. Continuing education differs from project-based literacy programmes, with strict time limits, as
continuing education is about facilitating lifelong education (DAM, 2005). In this sense, it is different from the
common definition of continuing education, which refers to adult education offered in formal institutions.
However, in DAM’s terminology, continuing education refers to learning activities, including literacy practice
after non-formal education programmes and is seen as a bridge to life-long learning.
Ganokendra
DAM has supported Ganokendra2, learning facilities, or ‘People’s Centre’ in Bengali. Ganokendra are widely
acknowledged as Community Learning Centres (CLC) under UNESCO’s generic categories. DAM
emphasised introducing Ganokendra in communities that had large numbers of illiterates. According to DAM
staff, before its introduction, literacy projects existed; however, when after completing courses, users had little
opportunity to implement any skills obtained. Therefore, they and their communities demanded that DAM
should continue to provide literacy programmes and this is how the first Ganokendra was introduced to
communities in 1992. According to DAM(2006b), the purpose of Ganokendra is ‘to facilitate institutionalised
support for the people in the community towards improvement of quality of life, their social empowerment and
economic self-reliance.’ Even though DAM organises and manages Ganokendra with the communities’
involvement and support, the ownership of Ganokendra is eventually passed onto these communities (DAM,
2006a).
Ganokendra are composed of general members and a management committee. Everyone in the community can
use them. However, when literacy practice was one of the main activities at Ganokendra, general members
were categorised into primary targeted groups or secondary targeted groups. The first target groups were given
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
87
priority to participate in activities and there were 100 general members (both groups). The primary targeted
members were considered illiterate or neo-literate and 75% of the general members were in this group. Further,
75% of the primary targeted group members were female. The other 25% of the general members were the
secondary targeted group. The gender distribution of the secondary members was the same as the primary
targeted group, 75% of the secondary targeted group was female. Most Ganokendra followed this pattern when
they were introduced. However, this division of members in terms of age, gender and ability described above
has been changing over the last 10 years. Now, younger people who are studying in college often come to
Ganokendra to read newspapers and look for jobs and are also considered Ganokendra members. Thus, the
image of a Ganokendra member has been changing from that of illiterate or neo-literate person to someone who
comes to Ganokendra not just to improving literacy skills or undertaking training programmes, but to better
themselves in a myriad of other ways.
Research Focus Area
I visited Ganokendra in Arabpur Union and Churamankati Union in Jessore Sadar, in the Jessore district (Zila),
located in the southwest of Bangladesh. The area of Jessore is 2566.68 sq km, and the population is 2,469,680
(male: 1,282,480, female: 1,187,200). The literacy rate in Jessore district is 51.20% (Information Ministry,
2006:20), and Jessore district has eight sub-districts (Upazila). The area of Jessore Sadar Upazila is 452.8 sq km.
The population is 642,808 (male: 338,454, female: 304,358) (Information Ministry, 2006:61) and the literacy
rate is 58.09% (Information Ministry, 2006:62). Commercially-raised crops are rice, jute, wheat, vegetables and
date tree (Information Ministry, 2006).
Both Ganokendra in Arabpur Union and Churamankati Union in Jessore were chosen for this research as their
selection allows for an in-depth investigation at individual level. They were selected according accessibility and
the fact they had both been established for at least ten years. I visited many Ganokendra in these unions for five
weeks in 2006 and was able to establish a good relationship with the community and most NGO staff members,
which were important factors, since it is not always easy for a female foreign researcher be accepted by local
communities and NGOs.
Method of Data Collection
My first field research was conducted in 2006 to explore the role of non-formal education in the empowerment
of women in Bangladesh focusing on what programs and activities were there and who were involved in them.
In addition to this, a two-month fieldwork project from February to April in 2010 and further research in April
2012 were undertaken in rural areas of Bangladesh. The focus in 2010 was individuals, and Ganokendra
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
88
members’ lives and community became the focus in 2012. This study takes a qualitative approach, and
therefore interviews and observation were employed as principle data collection methods. I interviewed various
key players such as members of Ganokendra, community workers, various NGO field and headquarters office
staff members, a local primary school principal, a local secondary school principal and a chairman of a local
council. I also visited 13 Ganokendra in the Arabpur and Churamankati unions of the Jessore district in rural
areas. Formal interviews were recorded with participants’ consent and transcribed into Bengali and English.
The interview data was augmented by fieldnotes that I kept based on my firsthand experiences in the field each
day.
Selection of Paricipants
In 2010, I visited 13 Ganokendra and one Community Resource Centre (there is one CRC per union). I
interviewed 37 people, consisting of 17 female GK members, two GK members’ husbands, six community
workers, a president of a community resource centre, a primary school principal, a secondary school principal, a
Union parishad Chairman, five DAM field staff members (area coordinator, union coordinator, CRC
coordinator, other field staff, administrator) and six DAM staff members in the headquarter office, and some
other people who participated through informal daily conversations. The methods of interviewee sample
selection conducted were purposive (criteria such as personal information, family, and education were
considered), opportunistic (people who were willing to participate in the research were considered), and
convenience-based (ease of access to informants) (Goodson & Sikes, 2001:24-25).
In April 2012, I also visited several Ganokendra in Arabpur and Churamankati unions. There, I focused on the
community rather than individuals, which were the focus in 2010. However, it was still necessary to understand
how the community worked based on the data obtained in 2010. Therefore, group discussions
(convenience-based) were employed in order to get to know more about the community. I chose four
Ganokendra, selected according to location and local community support for the study.
This study is not aiming at testing existing theories, hypotheses or concepts. However, Merriam (1998:6) states
that ‘Qualitative researchers are interested in understanding the meaning people have constructed, that is, how
they make sense of their world and the experiences they have in the world.’ This is the viewpoint what I have
tried to explore in this study. A combination of observations and interviews enhances the comprehension of a
researcher with regard to the feeling that people have about their daily activities (Marshall & Rossman, 1995).
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
89
Indeed, ‘qualitative research assumes that there are multiple realities’ (Merriam, 1988:17). That is, it takes on a
relativist and subjective epistemological position.
Interviews
The following areas were used to investigate the female members of Ganokendra in the early years of their
development in 2010: experience in formal education, family relationships, and childhood in general. In
addition to this life history, interview strategies were also examined. Investigating life history tries ‘to give
detailed insight into a specific individual’s perception and experience of their life’ (Goodson & Sikes, 2001:23).
Thus, individual life stories can be placed in their historical, local and social contexts (Goodson & Sikes, 2001).
Life history research methods are valuable when women are the research subjects because women’s voices and
experiences tend to be neglected, especially in a society where the gender inequality gap is large (Anderson &
Jack, 1991). Interviewing other key players at the centres, such as community workers, programme organisers
and staff members were also central to this field work. Interviews make it possible to obtain a large amount of
information in a short time (Marshall & Rossman, 1995).
The Interview Process
The interviews were carried out during the first visit and others over several subsequent visits. My experience in
2006 had given me some ideas on how to approach interviewing Ganokendra members, but this time I also
expanded the scope and enquired about their personal experiences from childhood until the present.
The interview was also the primary data collection method employed in the 2012 fieldwork. Even though the
data obtained in 2010 has been analysed, it was necessary to understand more about the community. Therefore,
conversational group interviews were conducted with members and community workers in the Ganokendra.
Apentiik (2006:145) mentions that unstructured interviews could be the most appropriate way when focusing
on issues in a community and trying to develop a research question. However, considering time limitations, a
semi-structured interview can be more effective in terms of covering the points that the researcher wants to
consider while giving more opportunities to express their opinions to the interviewees. Apentiik (2006:160)
adds that ‘Focus groups provide a good method for accessing group viewpoints and perceptions, [and]
highlighting differences between participants.’ Interview members were selected non-purposefully. For
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
90
example, there were a group of people who had gathered in the Ganokendra and to do handicraft work. After
agreeing to be interviewed, I started with questions about the Ganokendra, such as about the situation of the
community was when Ganokendra was introduced, and the like. Members also told me how the community
situation had changed over time.
Observations
The combination of both observations and interviews (informal interviews and conversation) is interwoven in
fieldwork research (Merriam, 1998:94). Thus, observations cannot be considered as a stand-alone method in
qualitative research. Observations allow a researcher to record what has been seen, experienced and felt in the
field (Merriam, 1998). Also, the data obtained from interviews can run alongside observations (Merriam,
1998:98). Merriam (1998:96-98) suggests a basic checklist that should be observed: the physical setting, the
participants, activities and interactions, conversation, subtle factors (non-verbal communication, dress and
physical space), and the researcher’s own behaviour. I carefully paid attention to these points while I was in the
field. I could observe what they wore when coming to Ganokendra. When I met some members in my first visit
soon after they recognised me as a foreign visitor they went back to her house and changed into their best
clothes. As time passed, they felt more comfortable having me in their place and they let me observe their daily
lives. The structure of the Ganokendra and its flexibility were understood through observation (from members’
daily routines). It was possible to examine how Ganokendra fitted in with the members’ and communities’
actual needs. In addition, recording physical features (the area of Ganokendra and construction material), social
factors (age and social status) and how people communicated and dressed was crucial. Some interviews were
also carried out in the participants’ houses. Also, I walked around communities as members, community
workers or NGO staff guided me which also enhanced my understanding of how much time a woman needs to
spend on doing housework every day, for example
Analysis
The processes of data collection, coding and analysis occur simultaneously within research that takes an
approach that is informed by grounded theory (Glaser & Strauss, 1967). All the data obtained are firstly coded
and categorised based on key phrases and terms. Open coding is the first stage in the process of analysis and
helps divide data into incidents (Glaser, 1978). Patterns and categories are developed through open coding. The
principal element of grounded theory is the process of “constant comparison” (Glaser, 1978:16). Constant
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
91
comparison involves comparing incident to incident and incident to concept further on. A category is ‘a higher
level of abstraction’ and consists of a concept or concepts (Glaser, 1978:38).
I performed the coding, and compared the codes and memo-writing on data obtained in 2010 and 2012, with
the analysis remaining a work in progress to make it “thick”3. Firstly, open coding was conducted on each
interview transcript. Data from observations were also collated with codes from interviews. As the further
fieldwork was completed in April 2012, the process of re-analysing data as well as analysing data newly
collected while memo-writing and coding through comparison was continuously carried out. Ganokendra,
women’s lives including their difficulties, changes and relations to marriage and the influence of traditional,
social and religious norms became apparent. It can be understood that getting married, especially for a female, is
an extremely important event in her life and her family as well as the community. However, in this context, the
importance of her family’s and community’s feelings are usually placed ahead of her feelings. Furthermore,
marriage has both negative and positive aspects with age and appearance being important conditions in
selecting a bride. I refined the codes and divided this analysis into three segments: the domestic situation, the
position of Ganokendra within the community and how Ganokendra are developed. ‘Taking control’ emerged
as a core concept.
The Domestic Situation
-Expectations of women in villages-
Women in villages are expected to take responsibility for housework, including such jobs as cleaning the house,
preparing dishes, and looking after their children, husbands and families-in-law. The most common daily
routine is described as follows (unaltered by the author):
I wake up before fajr azan and then do fajr pray (the morning prayer between dawn and
sunrise). After this I clean my house and cook for breakfast and lunch. After I finish
breakfast, [I] help my son going to school while my husband goes for work. Then I look
after animals: cows, goats, chickens, and think of what else I should do. If there is nothing
in hurry I take shower and do zuhr pray (just after the height of midday Sun). And then I
have lunch and rest a bit and do sewing. Then I check free-range animals whether they
are back already. Then it’s time to cook dinner...I usually go to bed around 10pm...my
routine work wil be the same until I die.
((70 ) Interview 21/April/2012)
There are many works in my family. There are cows, goats, ducks and chickens to take
care of. In the morning we sweep the house, clean the kitchen, and then we have breakfast.
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
92
I cook the suji, prepare milk, boil eggs and make chapattis. I clean the cow-shed, collect
milk and feed the cows. Then I help my daughter-in-law to prepare the food. I also do
some prayers. After having lunch, we do the dishes. Then, we again feed the cows, clean
the house and wash the clothes. ...and we have to cook for dinner.
((10&32) Interview 16/Feb 2010)
I had a chance to attend a wedding ceremony in a village. The bride and groom’s families were both landless
famers, which means they were considered as among the poorest level line in village. The groom said this
marriage was for his family, especially for his mother. He said that:
My parents told me that my mother is getting old and [she] need[s] someone to help her.
Parents decided to get the bride...if this makes my mother and family happy I am nothing
to say. I agreed to this marriage.
((68) 19/April/2012, Field notes p.25)
As can be understood from the above, wives are critical for supporting families through undertaking domestic
tasks. Importantly, married women in villages were expected to stay around their residence. After I visited
women’s houses and they saw me off, most of them walked with me just outside their houses, while children
and men followed me to the main road just outside their community. It was a little disconcerting that women
stopped suddenly at the point between their residence and the outside premises, but this was linked with their
customs, their ways of thinking, lifestyles, and community culture. In fact, a woman would be considered as a
trouble maker if she went out of her house without any reason. Even, when wanting to visit her parents, she
needed to ask for permission from her husband or in-laws. One of the research participants said:
I miss the time when I was a young student. If I had the ability to go back to my childhood
again I would have enjoyed playing around, running, catching fishes....That time was fun.
When I was a child I could go out freely. There was no boundary. But after [becoming]
married and being a wife there were limitations or conditions. I wasn’t free any more like
a young student. Now I have to get permission from my husband but when I was a student
I could move here to there, there to here.... (From Field Notes (12) 16/Feb/2010)
Not only the woman above but also most women I have interviewed in villages felt the same way. These
women were married when they were around 13 or 14 years old. Females are expected to behave based on the
social norms in their communities.
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
93
-Cultural pressure -
Early marriage is encouraged by the community. People were unconscious to the negative effects of early
marriage and people have even thought that girls were mature enough for marriage as soon as they reach the
age of menarche (around 12-13 years old). Parents and people in communities worry if a girl stays unmarried
after a certain age, and parents also worry about a son’s marriage, but the expectations are different: an
unmarried woman is not accepted in the community.
The family reputation in the community is very important and female’s behaviour or marriage status strongly
affects family reputation. If their daughter is unmarried after the upper-most marriable age, which is 18 years
old (in the past it was younger), people in the community will start gossiping about her family and her parents
will get embarrassed. As parents are concerned about their family status in the community, they want their
daughter to stay only at home and keep her good reputation or at least not damage the reputation of the family
by going outdoors. Around the age of menarche, girls start wearing traditional dresses (sarwar kamiz and burka).
Wearing sarwar kamiz and burka covers the female figure in accordance with their religious beliefs and it also
protects girls from unwanted attention from boys. If marriable-aged females talk with males without a particular
reason this affects how they are perceived and leads to them being looked upon as promiscuous, which affects
their family reputation. The following interview is from a group discussion (with Ganokendra members and
community workers) in a Ganokendra in 2012.
...people said ‘she is desperate. Her character is not good.’ This was our culture, girls do
not talk to boys, women do not talk with men. ... parents want to arrange marriage for
their daughters. So they don’t like love-marriage. So they don’t like if their daughter
talked to boys....it has been changing. If someone who got love-marriage, people in the
society boycott the family....hahahaha...it’s been changing but...parents want to keep the
girl pure.
(from Group Discussion (56) April/2012)
When both parents (of the potential bride and groom) start to talk about marriage usually the parents of the
potential groom (sometimes with potential groom himself) visit the house of the potential bride to observe the
appearance of the bride. Appearance, age, the wealth of her parents, and her and their educational level
(including skills that contribute to income generation) are all important points when negotiating marriage for a
girl/woman. These factors affect the size of the dowry that is demanded by the groom’s side and can come in
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
94
the form of material items, although dowries are now prohibited in Bangladesh.
When I attended a wedding and interviewed the groom he had not seen the bride yet. He seemed excited and
nervous. The bride’s family told me that she was 20 years old and that the groom was 21 years old. After he
finished Year 6 (around 12 years old) of school he started working as a farmer and sometimes as a
daily-employed builder. The bride finished Year 9 and stayed at home and helped her family. However, it is
hard to believe the bride is 20 years old, not because of her young face but it is unusual for a girl who is not in
school to stay at home and wait until 20 years old before getting married. Official documents to prove their ages
were not presented when registering this marriage on the day. (The guardians claimed to show proof of age
documentation afterwards.) According to the bride’s relative, she did not do well in her studies and she did not
want to continue her education. Therefore, her parents thought when she becomes 18 years old it would be
better for her to get married. The issue of their age is not the most significant point here. Instead, the fact that the
bride had continued her education until Year 9 and had not been pushed to get married is most remarkable.
Because the opportunity to get a better education helped to boost her family’s reputation as well as the way she
was seen with respect in community, she would have more opportunity to help her family while at the same
time she could enhance her own knowledge and contribute better to the community. Getting married for her
now was another option to secure herself and her family in their cultural context. As she was considered a pure
girl, the groom’s family would also put value on her.
Position in Community
In this section, the importance of the position in the community associated with marriage will be examined.
Love-marriage is associated with a negative image of women and is considered indecent. Even now many
parents prefer arranging their children’s marriage rather than allowing love-marriages to occur. According to
Ganokendra members and community workers, more and more girls go to school and love-marriages are
increasing. Thus, I asked them whether they prefer arranged marriages or love-marriages. This is a typical
response:
‘OF COURSE, it’s better for parents to look for a groom. We are older than them so we
know more than what they (children) know from our experience. And Hindus are
concerned about caste. We have to be very careful about it. Actually people who did
love-married have faced problems [compare to arrange marriage]. We have seen these
people. If a groom and bride are from different cast people in the community do not come
to their houses any more. Also, parents of the groom are unhappy because of
love-marriage. They don’t take care of new wife and wife’s parents refuse their daughter
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
95
[they don’t let daughter into house anymore]. And if a bride is Hindu and a groom is
Muslim it is a big problem. Both families reject them. People in the community are
strongly against this [type of] marriage. People are worried if others see this marriage is
accepted now and start following it [love-marriage and marriage with other religions].
And I know a terrible case, a husband was drug addicted. Love-marriage creates
problems....in Indian, Hindu and Muslim [people] can marry but they are movie stars.
For us it is unacceptable.
(Group Discussion (61) April/2012)
To be married is important not only for the couple, but also for their parents, especially the girl’s family. To be
accepted and maintain a family reputation in the community is vital. People often offer help with arranging
marriage for other people outside their own families since someone getting married is an important event for the
entire community.
Ganokendra
-educational services-
A member of one Ganokendra said, ‘Our [poor and uneducated persons’] dreams remain dreams forever.’
She feels powerless and cannot imagine her future, or, at least, she hesitated to talk about the future. Some
Ganokendra members said that they are ‘uneducated (�������)’ so they cannot speak openly in their
community. A woman who sees herself as an ‘uneducated’ person said to me ‘I am not educated...We can’t talk
in the society. We are ignorant’. She told me that her life is sad because she is not educated. She dropped out
from school when she was in class 6 or 7 to get married. Ganokendra were, firstly, established with the aim of
providing a place for literacy practice, learning life-related skills and knowledge for disadvantaged people in
rural areas. The majority of women in the Ganokendra said that obtaining literacy skills has changed their lives
positively. They are now able to teach and check children’s homework. Mothers always think of their children;
they can read them books that expose them to new worlds and they are excited to know about human rights,
health issues and the like. New knowledge helped them to better understand their surroundings and they were
able to put skills they had learnt from books into practice within their lives. Many female members had
experienced still-births with child marriage thought as the main cause. However, these people did not know the
risk of being pregnant at an early age until they came to Ganokendra. One woman told me that soon after she
got married her belly became larger and larger but she did not know why this happened. Then, after she gave
birth she understood why she became pregnant. People in the community tended to avoid talking about such
sensitive issues with each other but now they can have access to information from new sources. Women now
enjoy reading, especially reading newspaper advice columns, and they feel sympathy for others in similar
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
96
situations to themselves. Becoming able to write and read and obtaining useful knowledge through reading
increases their self-esteem and enables them to take control of their lives.
I met a member in 2010 who came to a Ganokendra to learn about cooking, childcare, and nutrition. She
particularly enjoyed books about women’s rights. She said ‘I especially like reading about women’s rights. I am
a victim of my family so I like this book. I was dominated by my husband. My decision is not taken into account.
Women in Bangladesh like me should know what women’s rights are. That’s why I like this book. Actually we
never had such rights.’ In the book on women’s rights, it is explained that actions should be taken against early
marriage, domestic violence, and one-side divorce. As her husband easily got upset and did not agree with her
participating in activities at the Ganokendra, she could not participate. However, as her husband left home early
in the morning for work and came home late in the evening, she could manage to come to the Ganokendra for
reading, although she seemed to lack confidence.
However, when I later met her again in 2012, she looked more confident and was talking about herself and her
family. She proudly told me that ‘I won over my husband about my daughter’s marriage.’ Her husband and
mother in law were planning to arrange a marriage for her daughter who was 15 years old, but she wanted her
daughter to continue her education. However, she could not tell her husband that she disagreed with the
marriage and instead she slowly learned about early marriage and women’s rights through reading books in
Ganokendra. One day she directly told her husband what she wanted her daughter to do for the future. She
succeeded in convincing her husband not to marry her daughter off. She had changed much since 2010 when I
first met her with her interview data containing many of the changes she had experienced.
With the women becoming more confident, they were now more willing to talk about their and their children’s
futures. Many mothers hope for their daughters to be primary school teachers, and their sons to become medical
doctors or get jobs in the government sector or private banks. The reason why being a primary teacher is
popular among mothers is that their daughters can work at schools near their houses and will not have to leave
home before getting married. Also, they can continue teaching at school after marriage and teaching jobs are
respected by people in the community. The ideas of a teaching job fits into the social norms of the village.
-socio-economic impact-
Some interviewees were happy to get involved in economic activities through micro-credit programmes offered
at Ganokendra by various organisations, including DAM. Participants are expected to sign their names and in
the case of DAM’s programme, are divided into grades A(literate) and E(liberate). Members in A grade can
apply for skill training such as embroidery (nokshikata), dress-making and livestock raising (goats, cows,
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
97
chickens). After that, they can obtain other support for income-generating activities or other relevant activities.
When a member is interested in income-generating activities, she firstly learns how to make savings and learns
about accounting or other related subjects. Then, the micro-credit programme loans an appropriate amount of
money to the member to start a small business. Sewing and livestock raising are the most popular business
among women:
‘I couldn’t even sign my name. I learnt how to sign after coming here. Then, gradually I
learnt how to read. I wasn’t even familiar with the alphabets � (o) or � (a). I even learnt
those. After learning all these, I took a loan a couple of days later and bought a rickshaw
for my husband. Then, I bought chickens and ducks. I am also spending money on my
children’s education. My children are still studying at school. ... I didn’t own a rickshaw of
my own. I have a rickshaw of my own [now]. I have goats, chickens and ducks of my own.
Again, for instance, my children used to spend their life in one condition [not going school,
staying at home and help family] but now the situation has been changed. Before owning
a rickshaw I had to give 30tk everyday to people [rickshaw owners]. Now, this money is
not going outside my hands. I can use this money for buying things for my household
equivalent to a day’s market. So am I not prospering? I have taken the loan for my success
and I have succeeded too.’
(Interview (4) 15/Feb/2010)
The typical model of the livestock business is that a woman buys a goat with the loan. Then, when the goat
gives birth she sells the baby goats. Next, she might buy 60 ducks (1 duck 25tk). 6 months later these ducks lay
their eggs. She can sell eggs (2 eggs 12tk) or wait 28 days and sell the baby chicks (female chicks 180tk, male
chicks 150tk). Another model is that she buys a 12,000tk small cow (2kg cow) and looks after it for 2 years and
the cow can give milk. 1kg of milk is sold for around 30tk. If she can spend 25,000tk on a bigger cow (4kg
cow) the cow gives milk after a year later. Australian cows and Pakistan cows are more expensive as they are
10kg big and more productive. However, it is quite difficult for villagers to invest copious amounts of money on
such cows and more advanced livestock skills are required. The simple and easier model to start a livestock
business is that a woman buys a small goat or cow and raises it. When it becomes bigger she can sell it at a
higher price.
‘I have chickens, cows, goats for income generation. We didn’t have much money before
but now I can spend money. I can buy whatever I feel it is necessary. I can spend money
for my children.’
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
98
(Interview (12) 16/Feb/2010)
‘My life is changed. I make dresses, have a cow. 2000tk saving was made in this
Ganokendra through micro-credit. Per week I keep 10tk for saving and my total deposit
with it is 2000tk.’
(Interview (23) Feb/2010)
Women who earn money through their own businesses can manage their own finances which enables them to
make their own decisions. This provides them with more control over how to use their money rather than
relying on their husbands, whose work may be unstable. When they self-earn, of course they can then discuss
these matters with their family if they wish to do so, and this new experience encourages self-confidence.
-Socio-cultural impact-
There are many challenges in the community such as issues of early marriage, lack of education and gender
inequality. Many people think these are critical issues so there are various social awareness programmes and
reading materials on such topics in Ganokendra. People in each community know that education is important,
early marriage is not good, dowries are prohibited, and discrimination against women is an issue. Nevertheless,
simply talking about these issues is not enough. Understanding the existence of problems and undertaking
actions to eradicate them are two different things. For example, the constitution of Bangladesh states that
females are able to marry at or over 18 years old and males at 21 years. However, while people in villages are
aware of the law, early marriage has remained the norm. Unless the shared ideal among people about
girls/women’s social role is changed, this opposition between laws and social norms will continue to exist.
Indeed, people know early marriage is officially against the law and parents and the community will be blamed
if officials find out. Thus, parents and the community keep the secret together if someone marries under age.
While I was walking around a village a woman pointed out another woman who was cooking lunch and told
me, ‘she just got married two days ago and came to this house’. Then a community worker said to me ‘she is
under 18, early marriage’. The newly married lady and some people around her had become nervous, but some
people who know me well told them ‘Yuko is okay’, which implied that although I am not from this
community I would not be reporting this marriage to the police.
On the one hand, people in the community might encourage early marriage even though they say that it is not
good. There are cases where people in the community tried to prevent early marriage. A girl of 13-14 years old
was about to be married off. Her father had passed away and her mother and grandmother were looking after
her and two other children. Her mother let the community know one of her daughters was getting married to a
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
99
driver. A community worker told the mother, ‘she is still young and drivers have a bad reputation. They marry
in different places where they go.’ Other people also tried to convince the mother not to marry her daughter off
by telling her, ‘another girl in this community got married to a driver but he was addicted to drugs and alcohol.’
However, the mother told the community that in fact her mother-in-law wanted her daughter to marry and the
mother-in-law became angry after hearing what the community though about it. People took turns visiting her
mother and grandmother in order to convince her that this marriage would be of little benefit to her daughter
and eventually they became convinced so on day of the marriage when the groom came to take collect his bride,
the mother and grandmother declined the marriage by telling him the community was opposed because the
groom was Muslim and the bride was Hindu.
Most people in cities spend months to prepare a wedding ceremony and the celebration party usually lasts at
least a week. But it is common in villages to spend less than a week to arrange a bride and groom, and the party
is finished in a day. There are even cases where everything, including the initial meeting between potential bride
and groom’s family, inviting people, and the ceremony is all performed at the same time without advance
preparation.
Most women I interviewed had married before 18 and they regretted it. However, parents were marrying their
daughters off at any early age not because they didn’t love them, but instead for their daughter’s happiness.
However, things did not always go as parents wished and many women experienced difficulties. For instance,
discontinuing school made them upset at not only losing the chance to study at school but also at being
separated from friends. Being away from family was not an easy thing for these young teenage girls, as learning
housework was new, and they experienced such things as coping with violence from husbands or in-laws,
stillbirths, or early infant death or their husbands secretly re-marrying. They said that if they had known about
the negative aspects of early marriage and the importance of education they would have avoided getting
married. Women who could overcome such difficulties said that they hoped to educate their children about the
pitfalls. One reason for taking the opportunity to complete at least basic education away from women was
marriage. The financial condition of a woman’s family often influences their making on decision on marriage
and not having a good education makes women look down on themselves.
Common perceptions shared in the community often obstruct the practice of innovative ideas such as the
avoidance of early marriage and the acknowledgement that dowries are prohibited. It is critical to re-establish a
shared awareness in the community. Ganokendra contribute to this as each Ganokendra is located within the
community and participation is essential in keep it operational. Importantly, people can slowly accept changes
and can start comparing their lives in the past to the present. Thus, many people expressed that they did not
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
100
want their children to follow the difficult lives they experienced themselves, this idea becoming more prevalent,
especially among women.
Discussion and concluding remarks
There is very limited information regarding the researched area of Ganokendra and individual people who use
them. However, it can be seen through this research that Ganokendra can flexibly reflect community needs as
well as individual people’s needs. This is a unique characteristic of Ganokendra and it is made possible because
Ganokendra get into communities and approach people directly. Therefore, the services provided at
Ganokendra have been changing over time and now they also have other important roles as libraries or
providing opportunities to access information. This is very different to how they operated in 2006 when they
were mostly for literacy practice or provided social awareness programs such as early marriage protection,
sanitation improvement, HIV/AIDS precautions and children and women’s trafficking prevention.
Today, Ganokendra provide numerous opportunities for income-generating activities for disadvantaged people,
especially females. Newspapers are provided every day and many reading materials such as monthly magazines,
story books and skill development materials are housed. However, the facilities and buildings themselves are
still not well equipped and not well constructed compared to other formal institutions, and there are few
programmes offering formal educational certificates for adults, compared to those in community based learning
centres.
Many people I met and talked to had improved their life through the activities undertaken at Ganokendra, while
others were not interested, but had their own distinct views. This research found that Ganokendra have helped
to positively change social norms and has expanded women’s choices. Moreover, these social norms are
strongly related to marriage and this influences girls’ lives as well as their families and community. The social
norms have been changing and this shift allows them to take more control of their lives and Ganokendra in their
areas contributes to this gradual change.
The basic guidelines of the grounded theory approach inspired the analysis of data for this paper. From the
codes, the following become apparent: the domestic situation of women in villages, their position in the
community and Ganokendra, which has contributed to women’s empowerment and community development.
In exploring women’s participation in Ganokendra in rural Bangladesh based on this core concept, Pierre
Bourdieu’s work on the different forms of capital is considered helpful to understanding how a woman with
limited resources can become able to take more control over her own life as well as to gain control within her
family, the next step in developing a framework for further analysis.
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
101
References
Ali, M., & Jeria, A. M. (2000). Bangladesh Non Formal Education. Dhaka: Published for the World Bank, The
University Press Limted.
Anderson, K., & Jack, D. (1991). Learning to listen: interview techniques and analysis. In S. Gluck & D. Patai
(Eds.), Women's Worlds: The Feminist Practice of Oral History. New York: Routledge.
Apentiik, C. R. A., & Parpart, J. L. (2006). Working in Different Cultures: Issues of Race, Ethnicity and Identity.
In V. Desai & R. B. Potter (Eds.), Doing Development Research. London: SAGE.
Chandra, R. (2003). Encyclopaedia of Education in South Asia, Vol.7. Delhi: Kalpaz Publications.
Coombs, P. H., & Ahmed, M. (1974). Attacking Rural Poverty. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
DAM. (2005). Annual Report 2003/2004. Dhaka: Dhaka Ahsania Mission.
DAM. (2006a). Continuing Education Program. Dhaka: Dhaka Ahsania Mission.
DAM. (2006b). GANOKENDRA. Dhaka: Dhaka Ahsania Mission.
DAM. (2009). Annual Report-2008. Retrieved from Dhaka:
Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Goodson, I. F., & Sikes, P. (2001). Life History Research in Educational Settings. Buckingham: Open
University Press.
Information Ministry. (2006). Zila Development Critical Survey, Jessore October 2001-Jun 2005 Retrieved
from Jessore:
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (1995). Designing Qualitative Research Method (2nd edition). London: SAGE
Publications.
Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case Study Research in Education: a qualitative approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
Publishers.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. San Francisco:
JOSSEY-BASS.
Rahman, A. (2002). Education for Development. Retrieved from Singapore:
UNDP. (2016). Human Development Report 2016. Retrieved from New York:
1 The most widely accepted definition of non-formal education is provided by Coombs and Ahmed (Coombs & Ahmed,
1974:8): ‘…any organized, systematic, educational activity carried on outside the framework of the formal system to
provide selected types of learning to particular subgroups in the population, adults as well as children’
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
102
2 One Ganokendra usually covers 0.5km across. The conception of ‘community’ is not same as an administrative boundary.
The administrative boundaries in Bangladesh, in descending order, are Division, District, Upazila, and Union. Unions are
further divided into Wards and Grams (villages). A gram consists of Para (settlements). Then, the next small unit after Para
is Paribar (family). The notion of ‘community’ used for Ganokendra is usually smaller than one Para and sometimes a
Ganokendra may overlap parts of several para. Therefore, communities for Ganokendra do not always follow administrative
boundaries, but instead people’s convenience is prioritised. 3 see The journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol.16 No.1 pp.63-73
j kJournal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
103
4 m
h i m e r
1f m h s niy
m f l h i
sh i l m f y e(000 e
e m e
m V SLT 4HYL LH UPUN 2 4 " t f s
s e s e pe h
4 i mf
e 4 s e f
4 h i l h i l f e
t f e
l t y f e v
f e m e
l e
7K JH PVU MV B Y HPUH SL 6L LSVWTLU 2 7B6" l f
ESD
) (- w 7B6 ) f
y s l e vs
v l m fy m
7B6 y t e r s ve s
t mf e t s
e w w mf
s e w n e w
mf
e r e p
s w p mf e
j kJournal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
104
“ t
e e e f
y s l f s e s t
e e f v e
l f r e m l f
) (-" e n f
h w e 7B6 e e
7B6 m mp f e
e e g e sl
r l fy y e g sl y e g m y
m fy n m e s s n s
m y se t l f
e ej k l e r
mf e7B6 e y l e e
s l fy e s l e
s l fi5
w 7B6 se 4 l f
4 h i l WLKHNVN eh i l
HUK HNVN l f mse s
ve l f
m e h ie h i l eh i
m y re s m s l f
f
e s e ― s m e
n w mf s
e s m e s m f
ty l e t
l f
PBL
4 f
" v
) v h i ―
m y t rw e
j kJournal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
105
f
we f
e f
we w v rw e) (
s f -f
e h i
e e w ve
.f
)"
e h
i e s 7B6 m f
) / m f) (. (, p /f
" 347 o
s e) (( )
l l f w
m se n
e m e s t n
e e t
m f
"l
) (( e h i
e l hl is e
e v 0f e
m f w
s te ) m
f s 5= e s 5= ) ( ) (, e
) ( f e
s m f ), h
v n i e l e s
7B6 h7B6 v i ( f
) (, e ( e
j kJournal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
106
r m f
y 4 eh mih ih ih
ih w ih i
t n e v e
7B6 t f
e w “ e g
t f s l se e
pe f e
nh RUV "i l h RUV V RPUN"ie
h se v r m m m rr e e tlme
e m e te m m
v n s i(( mf
y e h i
l ey “ l f r e
v mf m fy
e l ()f e
s e s y m
f
e e s m
e 4 e s t
m e t mf y l
s f 4 s e s
l f lv l e w t
mf l e my e
f
p t v e w
trw l f m e s e
e s e p v
4 f
j kJournal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
107
( ) 4
(2010)13 e w h w i eh t
m y r t e
mn e mv i f
ws f m l se m
s e l
f y m m s
l fy n y s l f e m e
m ve e
v l e m f y n
h i f
PBL e s t
rw e h i l f
l 4 emv r sl se
v s m f
4 e H L FLUNL s BP H LK LH UPUN
h y i( l f H L
FLUNL e e r
e y v p f
m e mn p e el m
p (,f e e l e
el y e t y e
l (-f
4 e s r
j kJournal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
108
e
(.f e
u e (/e v(0fy
y s w l f
y m e
m e nl s f
4 e n e v mf r e
em
t p m f
e p v m y t
f 4 n e
l e p
y y l f y n l e r y e
s f
g e
y s t f e
p f e
e p nr l fy n e
r s w ve s trw
n v l fy y e f
4 e e
r fy hl i f
e se s
l f h mi p m e h
ni l f
yy n l f3 e4567 fyy
e ( sl fy l e
s m mf l f
j kJournal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
109
l s w e s
y e n e
f 8 e
l f 3e 567 8 fy
l fyy e
t v e y s
t f
8 t r 4 e8
sl f e gs m r l f
p ) t s , l f
, 4
PBL e n sl nrf
l e e
y f 3 4 ABCDE eF
p e s p f
j kJournal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
110
l mf l f
2017 7 l e 50 p e
n s mf e h i
l f
e s w my m
vf s m y f
e e m e e v
l t l y f e mn
l e
e e
ny m f 5= e
e nf e
n f
yy el l f
el s m p
v f p l e
e p f e
e
v f
y n e 4 e
s em
) p f 4 s
e l v l f
” s
w m e s r s y sl
f r m e l r
l f r l se l y t m
y l f mf
r e m PBL e s
e ” t f
” e y l f p el
t 1 e e
f e f
j kJournal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
111
n e 4 v sl f
h ih ih ih
i s e v h m ih
ih ih i s f
v s e mf
4 r r m f
) (. e t h t i
mn eb t vh i ec
t h i ed r n h
rn i eh i m fh
i eh i h i sh s t
n ri fy h ri h
n ri e m fh n
ri r sh m i
l e s w v ey r
we w y s t n y
m f e s v r
e h r i m f
r e m
v sl f
f s
n s
r l f
4 e h ih ih rn
i l e
y v eh r i f
D 7B5 ) ( "j7B6 k e h y
i m f e m f
y n s 4 l p
f
j kJournal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
112
) (- w h 4 w
i e h 4 m
a v i e
e sv B6
m f v f
e e e e
e ― m m f
m m e l p f
h iO W1&& JYJK VYHRH HJ W& YL & VYHSKV& - -) B O TS ) (.
() ))
py ) -"j e e
k
) () j w 7B6
k . 0
) (,"h r
i j
k
(00 "j
k
) ( "h y i jh i k
)( /
) ( j k
) 0 h j k
i ( (( ()
7 A ) ( "h
i
) (-"h w 7B6
r i V , ,.
l ― ) "h
i h m i
," .( .-
) ,"h w h i h i v
ih m i -" () ()/
) () h 1 v i
0 (
) ( " h7B6 i j
7B6k0 0-
) (," h 7B6 m ij
k ., /-
) (," h7B6 w
j kJournal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
113
ij k0 ( - O W1&& YLL YHR H UL W&MPSLY&RHU V&3UU HSALWV 0 ( WKM
) ( "h m i
/ ) , -
) ( j7B6 k
O W1&& ULYKVJ ULYJV V N&PTHNLY& (0& (0 /&(0 /0/: WKM
:LHU H L 7 PLUUL FLUNL (00("
5HT PKNL DUP L YP LYY1 5HT PKNL D
=PJOHLS 7 V L =H R A HTL ) ((" 5 LH PUN BOH LK EHS L 9H H K 4 YPULYY AL PL
) (( :HU 8L D 7B5 ) ( " 7K JH PVU MV B Y HPUH SL 6L LSVWTLU LUY1 3 VSPJ HUK HJ PJL AL PL CVVS
H PY1 D 7B5
( e e e e e
m f) ) ( e h i e
e e h
i m seh i h i mf
y h i nf
r w s t m mn l f
yy s r nr e mf5 ) (-" , f - ― ) f. ) ," ) () f/ ) (," f0 ) ( f( ) (, f(( ) ( " ,, f() ) (-" f( ) ( " f( h iO W1&& JYJK VYHRH HJ W& YL & VYHSKV& - -) B O TS ) (.
() ))(, h i ) -" ) f(- pyh i .( .) f(. ) ( " f (/ ) ( " m e s y n mm se v f
(0 ) 0 f 20 m e ) () f e V L HTL ) (("
) ( " e 5 LH PUN BOH LK EHS L 5BE e s
s y
l e l se me m f
�
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
115
J Goodman, Diane J. 2011 Promoting
Diversity and Social Justice: Educating People from Privileged Groups 2nd ed. Routledge
1980
J
J p. Privileged
Groups J J
J
J J
J
J J
J J
J
J
J
1
2
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
116
3 J
4
5
6 J
7
8
9
10 J
11
1
J
J J
J J
J J
2 J J
J J
J J J
J J J
J p. 45 J
3 J
J
J
J J
p. 65
J
4
J
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
117
J J
p. 75
J
J J
5
J
J
J J J J
J
J
J
6 J
J
7 J J
J J
J p. 148
J J J J
J J
J J
J
8
J J
J J J
J J J
J J
J
9
J J
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
118
J J
J
10 J J
J
J
p. 234 J J J J
J J p.264
J J
11
J J
J J J J
J J
J J p. 291 J J
J J
p. 291 J J
J
J J
J
J
J J J
J J
p. 5 J J
J
J J
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
119
J J J
4
J J
J
J
J J J
J
J J
J J J
J p. 192 J p. 193 J
J J
J J
J
J
J
p. 13 J
J
J
J
J
J J
p. 292 J
J J
J
J
Journal of Engaged Pedagogy Vol. 17-1, 2018
120
2017 3 320
2,400