the italian side of the oblomov project a scientific …...the italian side of the oblomov project a...
TRANSCRIPT
The Italian side of the ObLoMoV project
a scientific approach (year 2)
Dr. Jacopo A. Vitale Researcher IRCCS Galeazzi Orthopedic Institute e-mail: [email protected]
• Summary of year 1 “New” team, numbers and dissemination activities.
• Activities of year 2: participation of beneficiary students in grassroots sports.
• Did we reach the final goal of 30%? The Kaplan-Meier survival curve.
• Data collection: results of physical tests and questionnaires.
Today’s agenda:
Overall design of the Oblomov project
December 2017
June 2018
May 2019
PRE TEST
POST 1 TEST
POST 2 TEST
ObLoMoV workshops
Grassroot sport partecipation
September 2018
February 2018
Year 1 Year 2
Summary of year 1_key points
Total number of students: (207) 127
Mean age (years): 12.4 ± 1.5
Relative N of female and male students: F = 46.8%; M = 53.2%
Mean B.M.I.: 20.2 ± 4.4 *
* Cole TJ et al. Establishing a standard definition for child
overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey BMJ.
2000 May 6;320(7244):1240-3.
ObLoMoV workshops (20h)
Data collection (PRE and POST)
Ethical Approval by University of Milan (28/11/2017, Ref N: 44/17)
Informed consent, privacy laws, and experimental protocol
INTERESTED: 7.1 ± 0.8
USEFULL FOR THEMSELVES: 8.2 ± 1.0
USEFULL FOR THEIR CHILDREN: 8.7 ± 1.3
HAPPY: 7.1 ± 0.5
CURIOUS: 8.6 ± 1.3 READY TO LEAD: 3.5 ± 0.9
TIMOROUS: 7.4 ± 1.3
NERVOUS: 6.8 ± 0.9
MOTIVATED: 7.8 ± 1.1
TEACHERS
0 = in no way 10 = very very much
Summary of year 1_key points
Year 1… Year 2!
4 secondary schools in/near Milan: • I.C. Grossi
• I.C. Maffiucci
• I.C. Frisi
• I.C. Cardano
12 (extra-)school groups (1h to 1.45h)
127 students
11 teachers
2 heroes / investigators
3 master students in Sport Science
1 master degree thesis
1 national congress (SISMES 2017)
Year 1 Year 2 (numbers)
3 secondary schools in/near Milan: • I.C. Grossi
• I.C. Frisi
• I.C. Cardano
+ 2 groups with Oblomov method (EXTRA SCHOOL HOURS)
+ 2 groups with Oblomov method (INTRA SCHOOL HOURS)
+ 34 new students
+ 1 teacher
+ 2 master students in Sport Science
+ 2 master degree thesis
+ 2 hours of lectures @School of Sport Science
+ 1 national congress (SISMES 2018)
Activities of year 2
1. Participation of beneficiary students in grassroots sports
2. New HEPA trainers were trained on the Oblomov method
3. Dissemination of the Oblomov method (congress, thesis, lectures, etc).
4. + + + Oblomov method was implemented in schools by the previously “trained” teachers
during physical education hours!
Other sports (no Oblomov)
Oblomov workshops again!
IN SCHOOLS
Participation in grassroot sport activity
Oblomov again!
N = 20
Total students involved in grassroot sport activity
N = 57
Other sports (no Oblomov)
N = 37
Did we reach the final goal of 30%?
Subjects’ identification in schools N=207
PRE evaluation Subjects’ screening and signature
of informed consent N=127
POST 1 evaluation N=111
Practice of HEPA in Sep 2018 N=57
Kaplan-Meier Survival Curve
0 2 4 6 80
20
40
60
80
100School 1 (out of Milan)
School 2 (in Milan)
School 3 (out of Milan)
School 4 (in Milan)
Time (months)
Perc
en
t su
rviv
al
The Kaplan-Meier survival curve_overall
Dec 2017
Feb 2018
Jun 2018
Sep 2018
* Eddolls WTB et al. High-Intensity Interval Training Interventions in Children
and Adolescents: A Systematic Review. Sports Med. 2017 Nov;47(11)
* Buchheit & Laursen. High-Intensity Interval Training, Solutions to the
Programming Puzzle Part II: Anaerobic Energy, Neuromuscular Load and
Practical Applications. Sports Med 2013.
Kaplan-Meier Survival Curve
0 2 4 6 80
20
40
60
80
100School 1 (out of Milan)
School 2 (in Milan)
School 3 (out of Milan)
School 4 (in Milan)
Time (months)
Perc
en
t su
rviv
al
Feb 2018
Jun 2018
Sep 2018
PRE POST 1 GRASSROOT SPORT PARTICIPATION
The Kaplan-Meier survival curve_specific
66.6%
46.3%
65.5%
DROP-OUT?
59.5% 44.6%
SCIENTIFIC DATA
How, what, when, who?
Overall design of Data Collection and Activities
December 2017 June 2018 May 2019
PRE TEST
POST 1 TEST
POST 2 TEST
ObLoMoV workshops
Grassroot sport participation
1. Anthropometric measures
2. Physical tests
3. Questionnaires
4. HR monitoring / intensity
1. Questionnaires
2. Grassroot sport participation
Preliminary data PRE vs POST (1 and 2): statistical approach
• The normal distribution of each variable was checked with the Shapiro–Wilk test and graphical methods.
• Paired t-test were used to compare data between PRE and POST 1 evaluations.
• One-way ANOVA were used to compare data between PRE vs POST 1 vs POST 2 evaluations.
• When normal distribution was not checked, non parametric statistical tests (Wilcoxon for paired or
Mann-Whitney) were used for all comparisons. Friedman’s test was used for 3-groups comparisons.
• (Correlations [Pearson’s r or Spearman’s rho] among variables (BMI vs performance; performance vs
habits; etc…) could be performed too).
• Effect size (Cohen’s D) and magnitude base inference (MBI) should be performed *
• A p-value ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.
* Hopkins W, Marshall S, Batterham A, Hanin J. Progressive statistics
for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. Medicine and
science in sports and exercise. 2009;41(1):3-13.
Data PRE vs POST 1 (N = 111)
Questionnaires
Data PRE vs POST 1 (N = 111)
Physical tests
Data PRE vs POST 1 vs POST 2 (N = 57)
Questionnaires
TAKE HOME MESSAGEs
1. 44.6% of the beneficiary students were involved in grassoroot sports in 2018- 2019
2. School teachers implemented the Oblomov method in their 2018-2019 school programs
3. + 34 new students, +1 teacher, +2 HEPA trainers were involved in the project in 2018-2019
4. Beneficiary students improved their physical fitness and activity levels.
Dr. Jacopo A. Vitale
Researcher
IRCCS Galeazzi Orthopedic Institute