the intertanko option to meet stricter annex vi requirements to reduce emission to air from ships by...
TRANSCRIPT
The INTERTANKO option to meet stricter Annex VI requirements
to reduce emission to air from shipsby
[email protected] Research and Projects
for International Ship-Owners Alliance Of Canada
Vancouver 27 September 2007
‘
Annex VI – Emission to air from ships
Annex VI on air emission from ships enforced as from mid 2005
but the world already demands stricter requirements
Shipping needs INTERTANKO seeks
• Positive reduction of harmful emission• A feasible, realistic and sustainable
solution• Long-term, predictable and solid IMO
standards• No unilateral nor regional regulations
World society demand cleaner ships
The consequences of burning the bottom of the barrel:• SO2
• NOx• VOC• Heavy metals• Soot
Effects of emission covered by Annex VI
• Sulphur - Acid rain – Affects ecosystems
• Nitrogen- Eutrophication:– Loss of biodiversity
• VOCs - Ozone– Damages plants and buildings/materials
• PM & Ozone, NOx and VOCs– Health problems; respiratory effects, cardiovascular effects premature death
SOX - situationSOX - situationDATE SHIP TYPE WHERE max. % S REG.
19.05.2005 All Everywhere 4.5 IMO19.05.2006 All Baltic Sea 1.5 IMO &
EU11.08.2006 All All EU Ports EU
MGO (DMA + DMX) 0.2 MDO (DMB +DMC) 1.5
11.08.2006 Passenger EU 1.5 EU
1.01.2007 All * 24 miles off California shore CARB MGO (DMA grade) --
MDO (DMB grade) 0.5
11.08.2007 All N Sea and English Ch. 1.5 EU22.11.2007 All No Sea and English Ch. 1.5 IMO1.01.2010 All All EU ports 0.1 EU1.01.2010 Inland All EU inland waterways 0.1 EU
1.01.2010 All* 24 miles off California CARB MGO (DMA grade) 0.1
1.01.2012 16 Greek Greek ports 0.1 EU ferries
* All auxiliary & diesel-electric main engines on all ships
Reducing harmful emissions from ships
• Onboard abatement technology– Still undergoing testing
• SECAs/NECAs– Air pollution recognises no borders
• Type and quality of fuel – The KEY to ultimate control of air emission
INTERTANKO Study
• No ships =>400 GT:58,859• HFO consumption: 350 m ts• MDO consumption: 60 m ts
• CO2 emission w. HFO: 1,246 m ts
• CO2 emission w. HFO: 1,246 m ts
• SOx emission: 20.1 m ts
The INTERTANKO solution
• All ships to burn only distillate fuels, with a global sulphur content cap:o Tier I - a maximum sulphur content of 1.0%, ando Tier II - for new engines - a maximum [0.5%]
sulphur content
• i.e. one Global Sulphur Emission Control Area• One Single Fuel specification included in
Annex VI• Simplified checking and monitoring provisions
Switching to distillates for ALL ships
• Reduced emission:o SO2, - 60-80%,
o PM, - 80-90%, o NOx, - 15%o ………………
• Improved safetyo Fewer engine problemso No switching of fuel to meet SECA restrictions
• Distillate spills far, far, less serious than HFO spills• Higher bunker price - but also reduced costs:
o No need for extra tanks, piping, abatement equipment, etco Less maintenance, off-hire i.e. lower operation costso Reduced bunker consumptiono Less engine room waste and (no scrubber waste)
The alternative to distillatesThe alternative to distillates
- For a main engine of 20 MW, seawater up to 22,000 t/day needs to be processed (45 t/hr/MW) (supplemented with some 6,500 t/day to lower pH)
- Up to 100 kg/day of hazardous sludge (5kg/day/MW)
* data supplied by Krystallon
Investing in cleaner air
~$67 bn investments
at ~100 refineries to provide the ultimate solution?
or
~ $200 bn investments onboard some ~ 50,000 ships
to provide a piecemeal solution?
World CO2 emission, energy use and population - indices
Source: CO2 emission: US Energy Information AdministrationEnergy use: BP ReviewPopulation: UN
CO2 emission increase stronger than energy and population increase due to relatively stronger increase in coal consumption
Index
90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004
Population
Energy use
CO2 emission
4.5 bn 6.6 mn18.3 bn
6.5 bn 10.6 mn27.3 bn
+42% +48%+40%
World CO2 emission
Shipping 2%
Other transportation
Eelectricity/heat
Industry +
Industrial processes
Land use change
Agriculture
WasteSource; World Resource Institute
CO2 effect of scrubbers
The major ion responsible for the alkalinity is the bicarbonate ion. The amount of bicarbonate and other weak bases in seawater buffers the system, thus keeping the pH within a narrow range. Standard seawater has a bicarbonate concentration of 140 mg L-1. Dissolved CO2 and
carbonates belong to the buffer system and are all related by the following four equations: Addition of sulphuric acid will shift the chemical equations 1-4 to the left and thereby increasing the partial pressure CO2 in the water.
The solubility of CO2 is limited and depends on salinity and
temperature. To keep the pH stable, CO2 will be released to the
atmosphere. Each molecule of sulphuric acid will be buffered by the release of two molecules of CO2.
Environmental Impact Of Seawater Scrubbing To Reduce Atmospheric Ship Emissions
Brigitte Behrends, School of Marine Science and Technology, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK
Marc Hufnagl, Forschungszentrum Terramare, Schleusenstr. 1, D-26382 Wilhelmshaven, Germany
Switching to distillates CO2 balance
MDO replacing HFO MDO as fuel: 32 m tsAdd. emission from Scrubbers – buffering: 27 m tsrefineries: 47m ts
Plus unquantifiable amounts of CO2: - Running scrubbers
- Handling of waste from scrubbers - Handling sludge - Less engine maintenance
- Less engine spare part placement - Less heating
Debit Credit
Extra CO2 when switching: 47m ts Saving CO2 when switching: +60 m ts
World CO2 emission, energy use and population
6
11
16
21
26
1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
CO2 emission Energy use Population
m tonnes bn persons
Source: CO2 emission: US Energy Information AdministrationEnergy use: BP ReviewPopulation: UN
Bunker price development 2000 - 2007Fujairah
050
100150
200250
300350
400450
500550
600650
700750
Jun-
00
Dec
-00
Jun-
01
Dec
-01
Jun-
02
Dec
-02
Jun-
03
Dec
-03
Jun-
04
Dec
-04
Jun-
05
Dec
-05
Jun-
06
Dec
-06
Jun-
07
MDO
HFO
Conclusion
The world demands clean shipping
Proactive and co-operative solutions are needed