the ins, outs, ups, and downs of pogil pedagogy melissa c. rhoten longwood university department of...
TRANSCRIPT
The Ins, Outs, Ups, The Ins, Outs, Ups, and Downs of POGIL and Downs of POGIL
PedagogyPedagogyMelissa C. Rhoten
Longwood UniversityDepartment of Chemistry & Physics
Blackwell Lecture SeriesOctober 18, 2010
Employment Criteria
You are a member of the Employment Committee of a start-up biotechnology company, which is planning to double the number of employees over the next year.
List at least three characteristics or skills that your committee will use to screen the applicants.
Quick learnerCritical thinkerCreativeProblem solversGood communicatorTeam playerSelf-motivatedKnowledgeable
Employment Criteria
Only one component!
What is POGIL?
Process-Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning
• A classroom and laboratory technique that seeks to simultaneously teach content and key process skills within the confines of a collaborative team.
• Research shows that students who work collaboratively learn more, understand more, remember more, and acquire skills essential in the workplace.
The POGIL Classroom
• Students work in small groups on specially-designed activities intended to develop mastery of both course content and key process skills
Targeted process skills include: information processing, critical thinking, problem solving, teamwork, communication, management, and assessment.
Traditional Pedagogy
• Teaching occurs by telling• Knowledge is a collection of facts• Learning is recall
Cohen, D. K. in Contributing to Educational Change, P. W. Jackson, ed., McCutchan: Berkeley, CA, 1989.
Johnstone, A. H. J. Chem. Ed. 2010, 87, 22-29.
• Current knowledge and our interests, prejudices, and beliefs control how we handle new information.
• This affects what we select from the sensory stimuli around us, how we process the stimuli, and how we store information.
• We each have a unique filter by which we select what interests us, what makes sense to us, and what is important to us.
Information Processing Model
Johnstone, A. H. J. Chem. Ed. 2010, 87, 22-29.
Information Processing Model
Limited working space: shared space that holds information temporarily and processes it.
• If linkages are formed between new information and current knowledge in LTM, understanding occurs.• If linkages are faulty - give rise to alternative frameworks (misunderstanding)• If no linkages could be made (no understanding) - information rejected or rote learned.
A New Approach
• Knowledge results only through active participation in its construction.
• Students teach each other and they teach the instructor by revealing their understanding of the subject
• Teachers learn by this process…by steadily accumulating a body of knowledge about the practice of teaching.
Elmore, R. F. in Education for Judgment, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA, 1991.
Guided Inquiry Approach
Students work in groups (typically 3-4) Activities use the Learning Cycle
(Exploration, Concept Invention, Application)
Students construct knowledge Students teach/discuss/learn from
students Instructors facilitate learning
www.pogil.org
Team Design
Manager – actively participates, keeps team on task, distributes work/responsibilities, assures that team members participate and understand
Recorder – actively participates, prepares written reflection/self-assessment report in consultation with team
Reporter – actively participates, communicates with instructor and presents reports to the class when necessary
Team roles rotate on a daily basis!!
Activity 02-1 – Atoms, Isotopes, and Ions
In the next 10 minutes, complete Critical Thinking Questions 1-11
All isotopes of a given element have the same number of but different numbers of _______________.a) protons, neutronsb) neutrons, protonsc) atoms, electronsd) protons, electrons
Question Question #1#1
Question Question #2#2
What is the symbol for the atom or ion that has 34 neutrons, 29 protons, and 27 electrons?
Complete Recorder’s Report
Homework – Meet as a group to complete Exercises 1 & 2 (pg 18). You must turn in a group answer to these questions on Wed at the start of class
Team MembersManager: _____________________________________________Recorder: _____________________________________________Reporter: _____________________________________________
Reflection on Learning – What questions does the team still have about the material covered today?
Self-Assessment - Did everyone in the team understand the material covered today? If so, explain how your team assured that everyone understood. If not, identify what your team needs to do to assure that everyone in the team understands the material next session.
Recorder’s ReportRecorder’s Report
General Chemistry
CHEM 111/112 • 4 credit lecture/lab courses (3 hours of
lecture and one 2 hour lab period per week)• required of all science majors
CHEM 111 (Fall 2009) – 6 sections taught by three separate faculty
CHEM 112 (Spring 2010) – 5 sections taught by three separate faculty
Commonalities in CHEM 111
• Textbook and companion POGIL workbook• Laboratory exercises• Test review problems• In-class tests• ACS final exam• Concept Inventory post-test
CHEM 111 Topics
• Elements and compounds• The mole (including balancing reactions, molarity, stoichiometry, etc.)• The structure of the atom• Covalent bonding (including Lewis structures, resonance, formal charges, and molecular shapes)• Gas laws• Thermochemistry
Format of Lecture-based sections
– “Teaching by telling”– Example problems worked out by
the instructor during class– No group work– Online homework assignments (via
Bb)
Format of POGIL sections
– Daily Quizzes– Workshop sessions– Team reporting– Mini-lectures (pre- or post-
workshop time)– Wrap-up & report writing– No online homework (students
were expected to finish any POGIL activities not completed during class)
Format of hybrid POGIL sections
– “Teaching by telling” - two lecture periods per week
– Example problems worked out by the instructor during class
– Group work (using the POGIL book) to reinforce concepts presented in lecture – one time per week
– Online homework assignments (via Bb)
In-class test dataC
lass
Avera
ge
t-tests (95% CL) show:
• Significant difference POGIL vs. lecture for Test #2
• Significant differences POGIL vs. lecture and POGIL vs. hybrid for Test #3
• Significant difference POGIL vs. lecture in overall test performance
Final Exam and CI Test
28th 45th 39th
Av. #
of
Quest
ions
Corr
ect
Av. #
of
Quest
ions
Corr
ect
Concept Inventory Test**
** by Krause, Birk, Bauer, Jenkins, Pavelich
Future Endeavors
Continue to improve POGIL facilitation in CHEM 111/112
Initiation of research study: Does a POGIL experience in 1st semester general chemistry affect retention of science majors?– Colleagues at UNC-Asheville found increased graduation rates among
STEM majors that had POGIL in 1st semester general chemistry relative
to those in traditional general chemistry courses.
Initiation of research study: Is there are correlation between GALT (Group Assessment of Logical Thinking) score and performance on the conceptual ACS exam? If so, is this correlation affected by the learning environment (POGIL vs. traditional)?