the importance of intersectoral collaborations to promote healthy public policy ghazal fazli, mph,...
TRANSCRIPT
THE IMPORTANCE OF INTERSECTORAL COLLABORATIONS TO PROMOTE
HEALTHY PUBLIC POLICY
Ghazal Fazli, MPH, Phd(c)Centre for Research Inner City Health
Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute,
St. Michael’s Hospital
Toronto, Ontario
ACT CANADA SUMMIT DECEMBER 2014
OBJECTIVES
• To share findings from consultations from a stakeholder engagement event including a variety of sectors and disciplines across Southern Ontario
• To discuss key findings on knowledge gaps, challenges and key steps to implementing policy changes related to the built environment that would promote physical activity and reduce obesity.
DIABETES EPIDEMIC
• Ontario is encountering an alarming burden of illness associated with diabetes
• Rising prevalence of type 2 diabetes will require population based interventions
Lipscombe L and Hux J. Lancet 2007;369:750-6
Neighbourhood Environments and Resources for Healthy
Living: A Focus on Diabetes in Toronto
www.ices.on.ca
Neighbourhood Environments and Resources for Healthy Living: A Focus on Diabetes in Toronto
30 - 50,000 50 - 75,000 75 - 100,000100- 150,000150- 375,000
FEATURES OF WALKABLE NEIGHBOURHOODS
• More compact/dense
• Grid-like street pattern (shorter blocks)
• Mixed land use
• Destinations within walking distance
• Sidewalks
More walkable neighbourhoods more walking
Suburban design discourages walking and increases reliance on
cars• Large lot sizes (more sprawl)
• Less connected streets (longer blocks)
• Purely residential zoning
• Few walkable destinations
• Often no sidewalks
Less walkable neighbourhoods less walking, less physical activity and more
obesity
TORONTO RESIDENTS LIVING IN MOST WALKABLE AREAS WERE APPROXIMATELY:
three times more likely to walk to work
twice as likely to take public transit
one-half as likely to drive to work
one-quarter less likely to be obese
As those living in the least walkable areasGlazier et al., PLoS One 2014
4-YEAR CIHR PROPOSED RESEARCH PLAN
• Dr. Gillian Booth of St. Michael’s Hospital holds a 4 year CIHR Grant on the built environment and its impact on health outcomes – obesity and diabetes
• Multiple studies designed to: • Examine 10-year trends in the incidence of diabetes in urban settings that
differ on the basis of walkability, access to healthy resources, and exposure to unhealthy vs. healthy foods (Time series methodology - area level study)
• Evaluate the impact of area walkability, access to resources, and exposure to unhealthy vs. healthy food on the development of diabetes (propensity-matched retrospective cohort study – individual level study)
• Model a series of predictive algorithms using hierarchical modeling techniques to model the impact of built environment interventions - changes in neighbourhood walkability, access to healthy resources and retail food environment) on diabetes incidence (using linked CCHS data)
• Critical components of this research program include integrated knowledge translation events and opportunities to engage important stakeholders, knowledge users and policymakers to identify policy solutions and recommendations
How do we get multiple sectors and agencies involved in translating evidence into planning
and practice?
URBAN PLANNING
• City of Toronto planning department
• Parks and recreation
• Transit• Private and public
urban planning groups
• Canadian Urban Institute
• LEED-ND
PUBLIC HEALTH
• Public Health Agency of Canada
• Ministry of Health
Promotion
• Toronto Public
Health
• Public health units
• Community health
centers
FOOD SECTOR
• Food policy
experts
• City of Toronto, Food programs and strategies
• Nutritionists
INTEGRATED KT EVENT : A COLLABORATIVE INITIATIVE
• In collaboration with Public Health Ontario (PHO) a knowledge user and stakeholder engagement event was organized on October 4th 2013 in Toronto
• Stakeholders were invited from planning, transportation and public health sectors, plus government, NGOs representatives from across Southern Ontario
The objectives of this meeting were:
1. Disseminate research findings to key stakeholders
2. Engage key stakeholders to explore potential applications
3. Provide a forum for sharing success stories and barriers to achieving changes in the built environment
4. Establish partnerships with researchers, planning and public health
INTEGRATED KT EVENT: OBJECTIVES
Participants = 55
Public health = 20
CRICH and PHO Staff and team =
13
Transportation = 10
Planning = 12
INTEGRATED KT EVENT: PARTICIPANTS ATTENDED
Regions/Municipalities
• Toronto• Ottawa• London• Peel• Hamilton• Halton• Durham• York
Non-governmental organizations
• Canadian Diabetes Association
• Canadian Partnership Against Cancer
• Ontario Professional Planners Institute
• Ontario Public Health Association
• Heart & Stroke Foundation
• Canadian Institute for Health Research
Government
• Public Health Agency of Canada
• Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care
• Ministry of Infrastructure
• Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing
• Public Health Ontario
INTEGRATED KT EVENT: INVOLVING MULTIPLE SECTORS
THEMATIC ANALYSIS
• A preliminary qualitative thematic analysis was conducted to identify:• emerging themes related to gaps in knowledge and
barriers that impede evidence-based decision-making and policy development related to the built environment
• Relevant themes and sub-themes were identified and validated through post-meeting consultations using online surveys.
• Survey response rate was 73% (stakeholders further validated the themes, knowledge gaps and actions identified)
Cross-cutting ThemesPartnership and Collaboration
System Integration
THEMATIC ANALYSIS RESULTS: THEMES AND KNOWLEDGE GAPS
Emerging Themes from Research on
the Built Environment
Targeted and
Impactful Messaging
Common Measures and Tools
Policy informed
and actionable research
Intersectoral
collaboration
within/between
Levels of Governme
nt
Importance of Public
and Private Sector
Advocacy
Solution-focused
implementation
• Economic arguments/tools
• Awareness of Political Environment
• Public awareness
• Changing Perceptions
• Communicating across sectors/agencies
• Intersectoral Partnerships
• Identifying champions
THEMATIC ANALYSES RESULTS: BARRIERS/ENABLERS AND ACTIONS
RESEARCH AND INFORMATION GAPS
Research and Information Gaps with respect to evidence that can help promote actions and policy on the built environment
71% (15)67% (14)
52% (11)
38% (8)
24% (5) 24% (5) 24% (5)
Research and Information Gaps related to the Built Envi-ronment Top Priorities
Lower Priorities
NEXT STEPS TO SUPPORT POLICY AND PLANNING
Summary of recommended Next steps to support policy and planning related to the built environment
Data
Acces
sibi
lity
and
Availa
blili
ty
Built
Envi
ronm
ent A
ctio
n Net
wor
k (B
EAN)
Advoc
ate
for O
ntar
io C
hief
Pla
nner
Health
Indi
cato
rs in
Ont
ario
Gro
wth
Pla
n
Set U
p Bes
t Pra
ctice
s Por
tals
Stra
tegi
es to
Sha
re/E
xcha
nge
Resea
rch
Find
ings
Concu
rrent
Stra
tegi
es fo
r Diss
emin
atio
n
Prov
ide
Wor
ksho
ps, P
rese
ntat
ions
, Web
inar
s
68% (13)
53% (10) 53% (10)47% (9)
26% (5) 26% (5)21% (4)
5% (1)
Top Priorities
Lower Priorities
• Interventions targeting the built environment that encourage physical activity may have tangible health benefits for the population if multiple sectors are engaged from earlier on
• Challenges in translating research findings into policy and planning initiatives aimed at promoting physical activity and curbing the rise in obesity will require addressing the barriers, enablers and gaps
SUMMARY
PEEL REGION HEALTHY DEVELOPMENT EVALUATION TOOL
AIM:•Tool to rate development submissions
•To encourage future development to proceed in a form more conducive to healthy living with a focus on physical activity
INVOLVING MULTIPLE STAKEHOLDERS
• Peel Diabetes Atlas
• Healthy development tool
• New partnership, shared interest in obesity-prevention
• Toronto Diabetes Atlas
• Toronto Community Health Profiles
• Consulting re: Ontario Diabetes Strategy
• Mapping of services
MOHLTCToronto Public Health
Peel Region
Public Health Ontario