the impact ofenantioselectiveanalyses in clinical …..."the impact ofenantioselectiveanalyses...
TRANSCRIPT
1
"The impact of enantioselective analyses in clinical and forensic toxicology"
Martin Josefsson, Research Chemist (Ph.D.) Waters Nordic MS Symposium, Jurmala 11-12/9 2012
C*
A
D
C
B
C*
A
B
C
D
Isomers
Martin Josefsson, Research Chemist (Ph.D.) Waters Nordic MS Symposium, Jurmala 11-12/9 2012
IsomersChemical identities with the
same molecular formulaCxHyOz
Constitutional isomersThe same atoms attached
in different sequences
StereoisomersIsomers with the same connectivetyDiffers in their spatial arrangement
EnanatiomersStereoisomers which
are mirror images
DiasteriomersStereoisomers which not are mirror images
2
Chirality and stereoisomers
• sterogenic (chiral) centerfour valences – different substituentschiral planes / chiral axes
• 2 n, 2 2 = 4 steroisomers
• cholesterol2 8 −> one of 256 isomers
• L-amino acid, D-glucose(peptides, proteins)
Martin Josefsson, Research Chemist (Ph.D.) Waters Nordic MS Symposium, Jurmala 11-12/9 2012
C C
C
A
A
B
B
D D
B C
C
A
A
C
B
C
C
A
A
B
C
D
B C C
C
A
A
B
B D
CHCH2CH2CH2CHCH3
CH3
CH3
OH
CH3
CH3
L-alanine D-alanineNH3
+
H
C
CH3
COOH
C
COOH
CH3
NH3+
H
Stereoisomers 3-phenyl-2-butanol
Martin Josefsson, Research Chemist (Ph.D.) Waters Nordic MS Symposium, Jurmala 11-12/9 2012
-0.65° +30.9° -30.9°
Enantiomers A-B, C-D
Diasteriomers A-C, A-D, B-C, B-D
Chemical/Physical properties enantiomers equal!
Optical rotation enantiomers differ +/-
A B C D
C
C
CH3
CH3
H
HHO
Ph C
C
CH3
CH3
H
H
OH
Ph C
C
CH3
CH3
H
H
OH
Ph C
C
CH3
CH3
H
HHO
Ph
145°C 145°C 151°C 151°C+0.65°
melting pointoptical rotation
Fisher projection
3
Definitions
Martin Josefsson, Research Chemist (Ph.D.) Waters Nordic MS Symposium, Jurmala 11-12/9 2012
COOHOHH
CHO
D-Glyceraldehyde COOH
OHHCHO
OHOH
HO HHH
D-Glucose
Fisher projectionD-/L- (dextro-/levo-)glyceraldehyde (ref.)
C4
3
2
1OH
CH3
CH2CH3H
rectus
(R)-2-Butanol
Cahn-Ingold-PrelogR-/S- (rectus-/sinister-)absolute configuration
monochromatic light beam
polarized light beam
test cell
optical rotation
Optical activity(+)/(-) or d-/lplane-polarized light
D-Glyceraldehyde = R-(+)-Glyceraldehyde
Stereoselective biotransformations
subtrate/product stereoslectivity
• chiral -> chiral L-tyrosine -> L-dopa• chiral -> nonchiral L-dopa -> dopamine• nonchiral -> chiral dopamine -> norepinephrine
Martin Josefsson, Research Chemist (Ph.D.) Waters Nordic MS Symposium, Jurmala 11-12/9 2012
OH
COOH
H
OH
COOH
NH3+
H
HOOH
NH2
HO
OH
NH2
HO
HOH
4
Racemate and racemization
Many drugs are racemates!
Racemate (50:50)equimolar amount of two enantiomers (R-/S-)
Racemisation =Conversion of a “pure” enantiomer toa mixures of enantiomer
spontaneously – catalysed – by biotransformation
Martin Josefsson, Research Chemist (Ph.D.) Waters Nordic MS Symposium, Jurmala 11-12/9 2012
CY
X
Z
L X
ZY
C+
X
ZY
CNu
CY
X
Z
Nuand
Nu:- Nu:-
L:-
transition state
Chirality and drug effects
• eutomerpharmacological active isomer
• distomerinactive or less active isomer
possible differencesü potencyü desired effectü side effects and toxicityü biotransformationü kinetics
Martin Josefsson, Research Chemist (Ph.D.) Waters Nordic MS Symposium, Jurmala 11-12/9 2012
enantiomersequal chemical and physical propertiesmay differ significantly in biological action
5
Chirality in pharmacology and toxicology 1:2
• receptor interaction• enzymatic catalysis• antibody interaction
stereoselectivityprotein structures (3D, α-Helix)amino acids (L-)sugar moiety (D-)active sites (functional groups)
Martin Josefsson, Research Chemist (Ph.D.) Waters Nordic MS Symposium, Jurmala 11-12/9 2012
Pharmacodynamics-what a drug do with the human body
Chirality in pharmacology and toxicology 2:2
Absorption- active transportDistribution- protein bonding- tissue distributionMetabolism- phase I (oxidation/reduction/hydrolysis)- phase II (conjugation)Excretion
metabolism is often highlystereoselective
Martin Josefsson, Research Chemist (Ph.D.) Waters Nordic MS Symposium, Jurmala 11-12/9 2012
Pharmacokinetics-what the human body do with a drug
passive diffusion is notstereroselective
6
Enantioselective bioanalysis
Martin Josefsson, Research Chemist (Ph.D.) Waters Nordic MS Symposium, Jurmala 11-12/9 2012
more complicated than conventional analyses “a four to five time factor in cost, time and effort”
• Detection no sensitive on-line detectors are stereoselective (UV, Fluorescence, MS)
• Chromatography (or Capillary Electrophoresis)separation by differences in chemical and physically propertiesenantiomers are equal while diasteromers differs
enantiomers can not be separated by conventional chromatography (RP/NP) but diastereomers can
the rule of three point interaction (attractive or repulsive), x-y-z
Stereoselective (chiral) analysis 1:2
Prosreagents applicable for many analytesseparation on conventional chromatographyor by capillary electrophoresis
Consrequires highly (enantiomeric) pure reagents risk for racemisation during derivatisation
Martin Josefsson, Research Chemist (Ph.D.) Waters Nordic MS Symposium, Jurmala 11-12/9 2012
indirect methods• Conversion to diastereomers
ion-pairing (dynamic)derivatisation (static)
R-isomer R,R-derivative+ R-reagent
S-isomer S,R-derivative
7
Stereoselective (chiral) analysis 2:2Pros
many different stationary phases are available no chemical conversion is neededreduced risk for racemisation
Consexpensive columns (1000-3000 euro) often poor column efficiency, N (long analyses)often hard to predict the stereoselectivity
Martin Josefsson, Research Chemist (Ph.D.) Waters Nordic MS Symposium, Jurmala 11-12/9 2012
direct methods• Chiral GC
chemically modified capillary columns(less common compared to LC)
• Chiral HPLCcyclodextrins (α,β,γ-CD, derivatives)macromolecules (proteins, antibiotics)brush-type phases (Pirkle phases)cellulose/amylose-based (Okamoto phases)
Impact of stereoselectivity in toxicology 1:3
what is the true concentration of the effective drug (eutomer)?
does 50% or 100% of the doseconsist of the effective drug?
tolerance and toxicity?(e.g. d-sotalol withdrawn due to
increased mortality)
Martin Josefsson, Research Chemist (Ph.D.) Waters Nordic MS Symposium, Jurmala 11-12/9 2012
• Chiral swithesoriginal drug as a racemic mixuturenew drug as a pure enantiomer
• Racemization and toxic enantiomersa toxic isomer (distomer) conversions can not always be avoided
8
Chiral switches- increased efficiency of drug therapy- unacceptable adverse effects- lowering doses (no isomeric ballast)- commercial aspects (prolonged patent)
Martin Josefsson, Research Chemist (Ph.D.) Waters Nordic MS Symposium, Jurmala 11-12/9 2012
Drugs marketed as single enantiomers
Ecitalopram/Lexapro Citalopram/Celexa (SSRI)(S)-citalopram rac-citalopram
Focalin Ritalin/Concerta (ADHD)(R,R)-methylphenidate R,R-/S,S-methylphenidated-threo-isomer d-/l-threo-isomer
Levosalbutamol/Xopenex Salbutamol/Ventoline (Astma)(R)-Salbutamol rac.-salbutamol
1992 - FDAinitial guidance on Chiral drugs
not availablein all countries
chiral switches cont…
Citalopram - Escitalopram
Martin Josefsson, Research Chemist (Ph.D.) Waters Nordic MS Symposium, Jurmala 11-12/9 2012
Chiral Chromatography by HPLC
B-cyclodextrin (Cyclobond I, Astec)250 x 4.6 mm, isocratic within 30 minMeOH/100mM citric acid TEA (55:45, pH 6.3)Fluorescence detection (240/300 nm)
Carlsson B et. al, Linköping Sweden
9
Impact of stereoselectivity in toxicology 2:3
do we know what drug thatwas taken? (prohibited or legal)
Martin Josefsson, Research Chemist (Ph.D.) Waters Nordic MS Symposium, Jurmala 11-12/9 2012
• Illicit drugslegal drug prescribed as a pure enantiomer“home made” copy drugs as racemic mixtures
the true identity of a new designer drug (RC)
Illicit drugs – amphetamines
ü S-amphetamine,Metamina – ADHDü R-amphetamine, metabolite for Seliginine – Parkinson’s diseaseü rac-amphetamine (or other ratios) from illicit drugs - Abuse
Martin Josefsson, Research Chemist (Ph.D.) Waters Nordic MS Symposium, Jurmala 11-12/9 2012
H
N
CH 3
CH 3
3
H
N
CH3
CHH
H
N
CH3
HH
H CH3NH
Selegilin
Dm-selegilin
R-amfetamin
R-metamfetamin
H
N
CH 3
CH 3
3
H
N
CH3
CHH
H
N
CH3
HH
H CH3NH
Selegilin
Dm-selegilin
R-amfetamin
R-metamfetamin
10
amphetamines cont…
Samples R/S-ratio
Case 1,25
Ref. (abuse case) 1,34
Metamina patients 0.10 (S-)
Selegilin patients 11.2 (R-)
Martin Josefsson, Research Chemist (Ph.D.) Waters Nordic MS Symposium, Jurmala 11-12/9 2012
Chiral derivatisation and GC-MS
N-trifluoroacetyl-l-prolylkloridHP5-MS 30 m 0.25mm/0.25µm
7.60 7.80 8.00 8.20 8.40 8.60 8.80 9.00 9.20 9.40 9.60 9.80
Ion 237.00 (236.70 to 237.70): 8401005.D
7.60 7.80 8.00 8.20 8.40 8.60 8.80 9.00 9.20 9.40 9.60 9.80
Ion 241.00 (240.70 to 241.70): 8401005.D
S(+)-amphetamineMetamina
suspected abuse
7.60 7.80 8.00 8.20 8.40 8.60 8.80 9.00 9.20 9.40 9.60 9.80
Ion 237.00 (236.70 to 237.70): 8401005.D
7.60 7.80 8.00 8.20 8.40 8.60 8.80 9.00 9.20 9.40 9.60 9.80
Ion 241.00 (240.70 to 241.70): 8401005.D
7.60 7.80 8.00 8.20 8.40 8.60 8.80 9.00 9.20 9.40 9.60 9.80
Ion 237.00 (236.70 to 237.70): 8401005.D
7.60 7.80 8.00 8.20 8.40 8.60 8.80 9.00 9.20 9.40 9.60 9.80
Ion 241.00 (240.70 to 241.70): 8401005.D
S(+)-amphetamineMetamina
suspected abuse
Impact of stereoselectivity in toxicology 3:3
are there adverse effects due tosteroselective biotransformation?
Martin Josefsson, Research Chemist (Ph.D.) Waters Nordic MS Symposium, Jurmala 11-12/9 2012
• Enantioselective metabolismInterindividual differences in metabolism Cytochrom P450 system/genetic variationpoor or extensive metabolisers, PM/EMdrug efflux transporter (Pgp), BBB
Citalopram (SSRI)Venlafaxine (SNRI)Tramadol (opiate, painkiller)Methylphenidate (ADHD)
11
metabolism cont… Venlafaxine (VEN)O-desmethyl (ODV), N-desmethyl (NDV)N,O-didesmethyl (DDV)
Martin Josefsson, Research Chemist (Ph.D.) Waters Nordic MS Symposium, Jurmala 11-12/9 2012
Chirobiotic V, 5 µm particle, 250 x 2.1 mmcolumn temperature was kept at 10°C
tetrahydrofuran: ammonium acetate 10 mM pH 6.0 (10:90; v/v), 0.2 ml/min
0.05% formic acid in acetonitrile was addedpost column, 0.2 ml/min
ESI (pos) 3Q LC-MS
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 22 24 26 28 30 32
Time, min0.0
5.00e4
1.00e5
1.50e5
2.00e5
2.50e5
3.00e5
3.50e5
4.00e5
4.50e5
5.00e5
5.50e5
6.00e5
6.50e5
7.00e5
7.50e5
8.00e5
8.50e5
9.00e5
9.50e5
1.00e6
Intensity, cps
20
S-D
DV
R
-DD
V S-
OD
V
R-O
DV
S-V
EN
R-V
EN
S-N
DV
R-N
DV
Compound Transition (Q1/Q3) Collision energy (V)
S-enantiomer R-enantiomer S-enantiomer R-enantiomer
VEN 278/58 45 100 102 19.6 23.4278/260 20
ODV 264/58 40 98.1 104 14.4 16.2264/246 20
NDV 264/121 35 49.2 54.2 19.1 21.6264/246 20
DDV 250/107 40 52.7 57.8 13.9 15.2250/232 18
Mexiletine 180/58 22 N.C. N.C. N.C. N.C.180/105 27 N.C. N.C. N.C. N.C.
Relative area intensity (%) Retention time (min)
Challenges in enantioselective analysis by LC
Martin Josefsson, Research Chemist (Ph.D.) Waters Nordic MS Symposium, Jurmala 11-12/9 2012
• Reference materialmany drugs are not commercially available as pure enantiomershigh costs
• Chromatographic selectivitycomplete baseline separation could be hard to achievesmall changes in mobile phase composition could give drastic change in chromatography
• Requires sensitive detection the “pure” enantiomer is 50% of the racemate (often other ratio 75:25, 90:10)detection under non-optimized conditions (e.g. pH, type and content of organic solvent)MS-detection not always applicable (e.g. normal phase conditions)
• Complex bioanalytical methods chiral parent drug and chiral metabolites must be separated under the same conditionschiral phases often more sensitive for long term matrix effects
12
Thank you for your attention!
Martin Josefsson, Research Chemist (Ph.D.) Waters Nordic MS Symposium, Jurmala 11-12/9 2012
Further reading
Chiral Toxicology: It’s the Same Thing…Only Different (Review)Silas W. Smith (2009) Tocixol Sci 110(1)4-30
Chiral recognition by enantioselective liquid chromatography: Mechanisms and modern chiral stationary phases (Review)Michael Lämmerhofer (2010) J Chrom A 1217:814-856