the icc court powers under article 6(2) of the rules alina leoveanu
DESCRIPTION
The ICC Court powers under Article 6(2) of the Rules Alina Leoveanu Deputy Counsel, ICC International Court of Arbitration Paris Bucharest • 27 September 2010. Summary. The Role of Article 6(2) of the Rules Two scenarios, one test Non-signatory Respondent Multiple Contracts - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
ICC Dispute Resolution Services
The ICC Court powers under The ICC Court powers under Article 6(2) of the RulesArticle 6(2) of the Rules
Alina LeoveanuDeputy Counsel, ICC International Court of Arbitration
Paris
Bucharest • 27 September 2010
ICC Dispute Resolution Services
2
Summary
The Role of Article 6(2) of the Rules Two scenarios, one test Non-signatory Respondent Multiple Contracts Multiple Parties Pre-Conditions to ICC arbitration Positive 6(2) Negative 6(2) Statistics Conclusion
ICC Dispute Resolution Services
3
The Role of Article 6(2) of the RulesThe Role of Article 6(2) of the Rules
To make sure that the parties have agreed to submit their dispute to ICC arbitration
The Court does not analyse sua sponte whether an arbitration agreement under the Rules exist
ICC Dispute Resolution Services
4
Two scenarios, one test (I)
Respondent does not file an Answer
Respondent raises objections to the existence, validity or scope
of the arbitration clause
ICC Dispute Resolution Services
5
Two scenarios, one test (II)
The existence of an arbitration agreement between the parties
The arbitration agreement shall make reference to the ICC Rules
ICC Dispute Resolution Services
6
Non-signatory Respondent
Test: a non-signatory Respondent will be included only if it has been closely involved with the contract containing an arbitration clause, e.g. if it participated in the negotiations, performance and/or termination of the contract
ICC Dispute Resolution Services
7
Multiple contracts
The Court may authorize a single arbitration to proceed on the basis of several contracts if:
all contracts are signed by the same parties
all contracts are related to the same economic transaction
all of the arbitration clauses are compatible
ICC Dispute Resolution Services
8
Multiple parties
Same tests apply
It is for Claimant to identify the Respondent(s) [Article 4(3) of the Rules]
If non-signatory Respondent(s), the burden of proof of their involvement with the contract containing an arbitration clause lies with Claimant
ICC Dispute Resolution Services
9
Pre-Conditions to ICC Arbitration(e.g., mediation, negotiation, recourse to dispute resolution
boards in the construction industry)
Do not call into question the existence of the arbitration agreement
They are left for the Arbitral Tribunal to be determined once fully constituted in accordance with Article 13 of the Rules
ICC Dispute Resolution Services
10
Positive 6(2) – I
If the Court decides that the arbitration can proceed in accordance with Article 6(2) of the Rules:
the Arbitral Tribunal will be constituted: confirmation and/or appointment of arbitrators
the Court will fix, as the case may be, the place of arbitration
the Court will set the amount of the advance to cover the costs of the arbitration
ICC Dispute Resolution Services
11
Positive 6(2) – II
The Arbitral Tribunal’s determination of its own jurisdiction
“[…] any decision as to the jurisdiction of the Arbitral Tribunal shall be taken by the Arbitral Tribunal itself.”
The Court’s decision on Article 6(2) of the Rules is administrative in nature and is not binding upon the Arbitral Tribunal
The Court will make sure that the Arbitral Tribunal decides on its own jurisdiction when scrutinizing the Award
ICC Dispute Resolution Services
12
Negative 6(2)
If the Court decides that the arbitration cannot proceed in accordance with Article 6(2) of the Rules:
the Court will not provide reasons for its decision
the Court will fix the costs of the arbitration
the case will be closed
ICC Dispute Resolution Services
13
ConclusionStatistics – I
Number of cases submitted to a 6(2) decision
2006: 193 cases = 32.5% of the 593 new cases filed within the year
2007: 238 cases = 39.7% of the 599 new cases filed within the year
2008: 214 cases = 32.3% of the 663 new cases filed within the year
ICC Dispute Resolution Services
14
Statistics – II
Outcome of the 6(2) decisions
Number of cases for which the 6(2) decision was positive (i.e., the case moves forward as it was filed by Claimant)
2006: 172 cases = 89.2% of the cases involving a 6-2 decision
2007: 214 cases = 89.9% of the cases involving a 6-2 decision
2008: 203 cases = 94.9% of the cases involving a 6-2 decision
ICC Dispute Resolution Services
15
Statistics - III
Number of cases for which the 6(2) decision was negative (i.e., the entire case is dismissed)
2006: 5 cases = 2.6% of the cases involving a 6-2 decision
2007: 10 cases = 4.2% of the cases involving a 6-2 decision
2008: 3 cases = 1.4% of the cases involving a 6-2 decision
ICC Dispute Resolution Services
16
Conclusion
ICC Dispute Resolution Services
17
Thank you for your attention
www.iccarbitration.org
Alina LeoveanuAlina Leoveanu