the “ground” myth - ieeesites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/archambeault-ground-myth.pdf ·...

105
The “Ground” Myth Dr. Bruce Archambeault IBM Distinguished Engineer IEEE Fellow IBM Research Triangle Park, NC [email protected] October 2007 IEEE

Upload: duongphuc

Post on 17-Apr-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

The “Ground” Myth

Dr. Bruce ArchambeaultIBM Distinguished Engineer

IEEE Fellow

IBMResearch Triangle Park, NC

[email protected]

October 2007

IEEE

Page 2: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 2

Outline

• Electromagnetics• Skin Effect• Inductance• Ground• Return Current Path

Page 3: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 3

ElectromagneticsIn the Beginning

• Electric and Magnetic effects not connected

• Electric and magnetic effects were due to ‘action from a distance’

• Faraday was the 1st to propose a relationship between electric lines of force and time-changing magnetic fields– Faraday was very good at experiments and

‘figuring out’ how things work

Page 4: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 4

Maxwell• Maxwell was

impressed with Faraday’s ideas

• Discovered the mathematical link between the “electro”and the “magnetic”

• Scotland’s greatest contribution to the world (next to Scotch)

Page 5: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 5

Maxwell’s Equations –Differential Form

tBE

tDJH

∂∂

∂∂

−=×∇

+=×∇

A difference in Magnetic Fieldacross a small piece of space

A difference in Electric Fieldacross a small piece of space

A change in Electric FluxDensity with respect to time

A change in Magnetic FluxDensity with respect to time

Page 6: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 6

Maxwell’s Equations are not Hard!

• Change in H-field across space ¡ Change in E-field (at that point) with time

• Change in E-field across space ¡ Change in H-field (at that point) with time

• (Roughly speaking, and ignoring constants)

Page 7: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 7

Current Flow• Most important concept of EMC• Current flow through metal changes as

frequency increases• DC current

– Uses entire conductor– Only resistance inhibits current

• High Frequency– Only small part of conductor (near surface) is used– Resistance is small part of current inhibitor– Inductance is major part of current inhibitor

Page 8: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 8

Skin Depth• High frequency current flows only near the

metal surface at high frequencies

Frequency Skin Depth Skin Depth 60 Hz 260 mils 8.5 mm 1 KHz 82 mils 2.09 mm 10 KHz 26 mils 0.66 mm

100 KHz 8.2 mils 0.21 mm 1 MHz 2.6 mils 0.066 mm 10 MHz 0.82 mils 0.021 mm

100 MHz 0.26 mils 0.0066 mm 1 GHz 0.0823 mils 0.0021 mm

µσπδ

f1=

Page 9: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 9

Current Migrates to Outer Portions of the Conductor at High Frequencies

Resistance is determined by the area of the copper conductor actually used at each frequency!

Page 10: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 10

S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY-- Comparison for Microstrip (1 cm Long)Various Widths -- 50 ohms (FR4, 4.2, 0.021) Trace Thickness = 0.6mil

-1

-0.9

-0.8

-0.7

-0.6

-0.5

-0.4

-0.3

-0.2

-0.1

0

0.1 1 10 100

Frequency (GHz)

Loss

(dB

)

1 Mil Wide uStrip

2 Mil Wide uStrip

4 Mil Wide uStrip

6 Mil Wide uStrip

8 Mil Wide uStrip

Page 11: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 11

S21 Dielectric Loss ONLY-- Comparison for Microstrip (1 cm Long)Various Widths -- 50 ohms (FR4, 4.2, 0.021) Trace Thickness = 0.6mil

-1

-0.9

-0.8

-0.7

-0.6

-0.5

-0.4

-0.3

-0.2

-0.1

0

0.1 1 10 100

Frequency (GHz)

Loss

(dB

)

1 Mil Wide uStrip

2 Mil Wide uStrip

4 Mil Wide uStrip

6 Mil Wide uStrip

8 Mil Wide uStrip

Page 12: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 12

S21 Loss Comparison Between Stripline and Microstrip (1 cm Long)6 mil wide -- 50 ohms (FR4, 4.2, 0.021) Trace Thickness = 0.6mil

-2

-1.8

-1.6

-1.4

-1.2

-1

-0.8

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

0

0.1 1 10 100

Frequency (GHz)

S21

Mag

(dB

)

6 mil Wide uStrip6 mil Wide StripLine

Page 13: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 13

S21 Loss Comparison for 6 Mil Wide Microstrip Loss (1 cm Long)Various Dielectric Loss -- 50 ohms (FR4, 4.2) Trace Thickness = 0.6mil

-1

-0.9

-0.8

-0.7

-0.6

-0.5

-0.4

-0.3

-0.2

-0.1

0

0.1 1 10 100

Frequency (GHz)

S21

Mag

(dB

)

Skin OnlyDiel (.010) OnlyDiel (.021) OnlyDiel (.029) OnlyDiel (.021) + Skin

Page 14: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 14

At High Frequencies

• Resistive loss and dielectric loss are present

• Inductance will usually dominate

Page 15: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 15

Inductance

• Current flow through metal => inductance!

• Fundamental element in EVERYTHING• Loop area first order concern• Inductive impedance increases with

frequency and is MAJOR concern at high frequencies

fLX L π2=

Page 16: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 16

Current Loop => Inductance

Courtesy of Elya Joffe

Page 17: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 17

Inductance Definition

• Faraday’s Law∫ ∫∫ ⋅

∂∂−=⋅ SdtBdlE

tBAV

∂∂−=

VB

Area = A

• For a simple rectangular loop

The minus sign means that the induced voltage will work against the current that originally created the magnetic field!

Page 18: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 18

Self Inductance

• Isolated circular loop

−≈ 28ln

00 r

aaL µ

+−+−+

+++

= 22

0 1121121

1ln

2 ppp

ppaLπµ

• Isolated rectangular loop

Note that inductance is directly influenced by loop AREA and only less influenced by conductor size!

radiuswiresideoflengthp =

Page 19: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 19

Partial Inductance

• Simply a way to break the overall loopinto pieces in order to find total inductance

L3

L4

L2

L1

L total=Lp11+ Lp22 + Lp33 + Lp44 - 2Lp13 - 2Lp24

Page 20: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 20

Decoupling Capacitor Mounting

• Keep as to planes as close to capacitor pads as possible

Height above Planes

Via Separation

Inductance Depends on Loop AREA

Page 21: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 21

Important Points About Inductance

• Inductance is everywhere• Loop area most important• Inductance is everywhere

Page 22: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 22

‘Ground’

• Ground is a place where potatoes and carrots thrive!

• ‘Earth’ or ‘reference’ is more descriptive • Original use of “GROUND”• Inductance is everywhere

fLX L π2=

Page 23: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 23

What we Really Mean when we say ‘Ground’

• Signal Reference• Power Reference• Safety Earth• Chassis Shield Reference

Page 24: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 24

‘Ground’ is NOT a Current Sink!

• Current leaves a driver on a trace and must return (somehow) to its source

• This seems basic, but it is often forgotten, and is most often the cause of EMC problems

Page 25: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 25

‘Grounding’ Needs Low Impedance at Highest Frequency

• Steel Reference Plate– 4 milliohms/sq @ 100KHz– 40 milliohms/sq @ 10 MHz– 400 milliohms/sq @ 1 GHz

• A typical via is about 2 nH– @ 100 MHz Z = 1.3 ohms– @ 500 MHz Z = 6.5 ohms– @ 1000 MHz Z = 13 ohms– @ 2000 MHz Z = 26 ohms

Page 26: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 26

Single-point ‘Ground’?Vs

Multi-point ‘Ground’?

• Which do I want? • Which do I get?

Page 27: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 27

Single Point ‘Ground’ Myth

• At high frequencies, inductance makes this impossible!

• At high frequencies, parasitic capacitance makes this impossible!

• Depends on the amount of ‘Ground’ error your system can stand…...

Page 28: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 28

Single-Point Ground Concept

GND via

Board A Board B

Metal Enclosure

GND via

GND viaGND via

GND via

GND planes

Page 29: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 29

Reality Overcomes Single-Point Ground Intentions

GND via

Board A Board B

Metal Enclosure

GND via

GND viaGND via

GND via

GND planes

Page 30: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 30

Where did the Term “GROUND”Originate?

• Original Teletype connections• Lightning Protection

Page 31: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 31

Ground/Earth

TeletypeReceiver

TeletypeTransmitter

Page 32: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 32

Ground/Earth

TeletypeReceiver

TeletypeTransmitter

Page 33: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 33

Lightning striking houseFIG 7

Lightning

Page 34: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 34

Lightning effect without rod

Page 35: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 35

Lightning effect with rod

Lightning rodLightning

Page 36: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 36

What we Really Mean when we say ‘Ground’

• Signal Reference• Power Reference• Safety Earth• Chassis Shield Reference

Circuit “Ground”

Chassis “Ground”

Digital “Ground”

D

Analog “Ground”

A

Page 37: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 37

Page 38: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 38

Schematic with Return Current Shown

IC1 IC2 IC3

Return currents on ground

Signal trace currents

Page 39: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 39

Actual Current Return is 3-Dimensional

Ground Layer

Signal Trace

IC

Ground Vias

Ground Layer

Signal TraceICGround Via

BOARD STACK UP:

Ground Layer

Signal TraceCURRENT LOCATION:

Page 40: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 40

Low Frequency Return Currents Take Path of Least Resistance

Ground Plane

DriverReceiver

Page 41: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 41

High Frequency Return Currents Take Path of Least Inductance

Ground Plane

DriverReceiver

Page 42: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 42

Microstrip Transmission Line

Stripline Transmission Line

DielectricReference Planes

Signal Trace

Traces/nets over a Reference Plane

Page 43: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 43

Signal Traces

Reference Planes

(Power, “Ground”, etc.)

Traces/nets and Reference Planes in Many Layer Board Stackup

Page 44: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 44

Microstrip Electric/Magnetic Field Lines(8mil wide trace, 8 mils above plane, 65 ohm)

Electric Field Lines

Vcc

Page 45: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 45

Microstrip Electric/Magnetic Field LinesCommon Mode

8 mil wide trace, 8 mils above plane, 65/115 ohm)

Electric Field Lines

Vcc

Page 46: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 46

Microstrip Electric/Magnetic Field LinesDifferential Mode

8 mil wide trace, 8 mils above plane, 65/115 ohm)

Electric Field Lines

Vcc

Page 47: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 47

Electric/Magnetic Field LinesSymmetrical Stripline

Vcc

GND

Page 48: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 48

Electric/Magnetic Field LinesSymmetrical Stripline (Differential)

Vcc

GND

Page 49: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 49

Electric/Magnetic Field LinesAsymmetrical Stripline

Vcc

GND

Page 50: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 50

Electric/Magnetic Field LinesAsymmetrical Stripline (Differential)

Page 51: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 51

What About Pseudo-Differential Nets?

• So-called differential traces are NOT truly differential– Two complementary single-ended drivers

• Relative to ‘ground’– Receiver is differential

• Senses difference between two nets (independent of ‘ground’)

• Provides good immunity to common mode noise• Good for signal quality/integrity

Page 52: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 52

Pseudo-Differential Nets Current in Nearby Plane

• Balanced/Differential currents have matching current in nearby plane– No issue for discontinuities

• Any unbalanced (common mode) currents have return currents in nearby plane that must return to source!– All normal concerns for single-ended nets

apply!

Page 53: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 53

Pseudo-Differential Nets

• Not really ‘differential’, since more closely coupled to nearby plane than each other

• Slew and rise/fall variation cause common mode currents!

Page 54: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 54

Differential Voltage Pulse with Skew1 Gbit/sec with 95 psec rise/fall time

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

Time (nsec)

Volta

ge

Complementary -- Line1Complementary -- Line 2Skew=2psSkew=6psSkew = 10psSkew = 20psSkew = 30psSkew =40psSkew =50psSkew =60ps

Page 55: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 55

Common Mode VoltageFrom Differential Voltage Pulse with Skew

1 Gbit/sec with 95 psec rise/fall time

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

Time (nsec)

Volta

ge

BalancedSkew=2psSkew=6psSkew =10psSkew =20psSkew =30psSkew =40psSkew =50ps

Page 56: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 56

Common Mode CurrentFrom Differential Voltage Pulse with Skew

1 Gbit/sec with 95 psec Rise/fall Time

-100

-80

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

100

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

Time (nsec)

Leve

l (m

a)

BalancedSkew=2psSkew=6psSkew =10psSkew =20psSkew =30psSkew =40psSkew =50psSkew =60ps

Page 57: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 57

Common Mode CurrentFrom Differential Voltage Pulse with Skew

1 Gbit/sec with 95 psec Rise/fall Time

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

130

140

150

1.E+08 1.E+09 1.E+10 1.E+11

Frequency (Hz)

Leve

l (dB

uA)

Skew=2psSkew=6psSkew =10psSkew =20psSkew =30psSkew =40psSkew =50psSkew =60ps

Page 58: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 58

Differential Voltage Pulse with Rise/Fall Variation/Unbalance1 Gbit/sec with 95 psec Nominal Rise/Fall Time

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

Time (ns)

Leve

l (vo

lts) Original Pulse rise=95ps

Complementary Pulse Rise=90psComplementary Pulse Rise=80psComplementary Pulse Rise=105psComplementary Pulse Rise=115ps

Page 59: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 59

Common Mode VoltageFrom Differential Voltage Pulse with Various Rise/Fall Unbalance

1 Gbit/sec with 95 psec Nominal Rise/Fall Time

-0.2

-0.15

-0.1

-0.05

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

Time (ns)

Volta

ge

Complementary Pulse Rise=90ps

Complementary Pulse Rise=80ps

Complementary Pulse Rise=105ps

Complementary Pulse Rise=115ps

Page 60: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 60

Common Mode CurrentFrom Differential Voltage Pulse with Various Rise/Fall Unbalance

1 Gbit/sec with 95 psec Nominal Rise/fall Time

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

Time (ns)

Cur

rent

(ma)

Complementary Pulse Rise=90psComplementary Pulse Rise=80psComplementary Pulse Rise=105psComplementary Pulse Rise=115ps

Page 61: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 61

Common Mode CurrentFrom Differential Voltage Pulse with Various Rise/Fall Unbalance

1 Gbit/sec with Nominal 95 psec Rise/fall Time

50

55

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

1.E+08 1.E+09 1.E+10 1.E+11

Frequency (Hz)

Leve

l (dB

ua)

Complementary Pulse Rise=90psComplementary Pulse Rise=80psComplementary Pulse Rise=105psComplementary Pulse Rise=115ps

Page 62: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 62

Pseudo-Differential Net Summary

• Small amounts of skew can cause significant common mode current

• Small amount of rise/fall time deviation can cause significant amount of common mode current

• Discontinuities (vias, crossing split planes, etc) and convert significant amount of differential current into common mode current

Page 63: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 63

Return Current vs.. “Ground”

• For high frequency signals, “Ground” is a concept that does not exist

• The important question is “where does the return current flow?”

Page 64: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 64

Referencing Nets(Where does the Return Current Flow??)

• Microstrip/Stripline across split in reference plane

• Microstrip/Stripline through via (change reference planes)

• Mother/Daughter card

Page 65: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 65

• Don’t Cross Splits with Critical Signals!!!– Bad practice– Stitching capacitor required across split to

allow return current flow• must be close to crossing• must have low inductance• limited frequency effect --- due to inductance

– Major source of Common Mode current!

Microstrip/Stripline Across Split in Reference Plane

Page 66: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 66

Splits in Reference Plane

• Power planes often have splits• Return current path interrupted• Consider spectrum of clock signal• Consider stitching capacitor

impedance• High frequency harmonics not

returned directly

Page 67: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 67

Split Reference Plane Example

PWR

GND

Page 68: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 68

Split Reference Plane Example With Stitching Capacitors

PWR

GND

Stitching Capacitors Allow Return current to Cross Splits ???

Page 69: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 69

Capacitor ImpedanceMeasured Impedance of .01 uf Capacitor

0.1

1.0

10.0

100.0

1.E+06 1.E+07 1.E+08 1.E+09

Frequency (Hz)

Impe

dnac

e (o

hms)

Page 70: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 70

Frequency Domain Amplitude of Intentional Current Harmonic AmplitudeFrom Clock Net

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000

freq (MHz)

leve

l (dB

uA)

Page 71: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 71

MoM Microstrip Model Current Distribution Example

Page 72: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 72

MoM Microstrip Model Current Distribution Example

Page 73: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 73

Emissions From Board

• Far field emissions not important unless it is an unshielded product

• Near field emissions above board AREimportant

• Example of emissions from board with critical net crossing split reference plane

Page 74: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 74

Near Field Radiation from Microstrip on Board with Split in Reference Plane

Comparison of Maximum Radiated E-Field for MicrostripWith and without Split Ground Reference Plane

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

10 100 1000

Frequency (MHz)

Max

imum

Rad

iate

d E-

Fiel

d (d

Buv

/m)

No-Split

Split

Page 75: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 75

With “Perfectly Connected” Stitching Capacitors Across Split

Comparison of Maximum Radiated E-Field for MicrostripWith and without Split Ground Reference Plane and Stiching Capacitors

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

10 100 1000

Frequency (MHz)

Max

imum

Rad

iate

d E-

Fiel

d (d

Buv

/m)

No-Split

Split

Split w/ one Cap

Split w/ Two Caps

Page 76: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 76

Stitching Caps with Via InductanceComparison of Maximum Radiated E-Field for Microstrip

With and without Split Ground Reference Plane and Stiching Capacitors

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

10 100 1000

Frequency (MHz)

Max

imum

Rad

iate

d E-

Fiel

d (d

Buv

/m)

No-SplitSplitSplit w/ one CapSplit w/ Two CapsSplit w/One Real CapSplit w/Two Real Caps

Page 77: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 77

Example of Common-Mode Noise Voltage Across Split Plane Vs. Stitching Capacitor Distance to Crossing Point

0

5

10

15

20

25

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000

Distance (mils)

Gap

Vol

tage

100MHz200MHz300MHz400MHz500MHz600MHz700MHz800MHz900MHz1000MHz

Page 78: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 78

Are Stitching Capacitors Effective ???

• YES, at low frequencies • No, at high frequencies• Need to limit the high frequency current

spectrum• Need to avoid split crossings with ALL

critical signals

Page 79: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 79

Pin Field Via Keepouts??

Return Current must go around entire keep out area --- just as bad as a slot

Return current path deviation minimal

sd

Recommend s/d > 1/3

Page 80: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 80

Changing Reference Planes Six-Layer PCB Stackup Example

Signal Layer

Signal Layer

Signal Layer

Signal Layer

Plane

Plane

Page 81: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 81

Microstrip/Stripline through via (change reference planes)

TraceVia

Page 82: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 82

How can the Return Current Flow When Signal Line Goes Through Via??

What happens to Return Current in this Region?

Return Current

Page 83: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 83

How can the Return Current Flow When Signal Line Goes Through

Via??• Current can NOT go from one side of the

plane to the other through the plane– skin depth

• Current must go around plane at via hole, through decoupling capacitor, around second plane at the second via hole!

• Use displacement current between planes

Page 84: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 84

Return Current without Intentional Path

GND

PWR

Page 85: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 85

Return Current Across Reference Plane Change With Decoupling Capacitor (on Top)

Return Current

Decoupling Capacitor

Reference Planes

Displacement Current

Common-Mode Current

Page 86: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 86

RF Current @ 700 MHz with One Capacitor 0.5” from Via

Page 87: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 87

RF Current @ 700 MHz with One Capacitor 0.5” from Via

(expanded view)

Page 88: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 88

BadSignal Layer

Signal Layer

Signal Layer

Signal Layer

Reference Plane

Reference Plane

Bad

Signal Layer

Signal Layer

Signal Layer

Signal Layer

Reference Plane

Reference Plane

GoodSignal Layer

Signal Layer

Signal Layer

Signal Layer

Reference Plane

Reference Plane

Possible Routing OptionsSix-Layer Board

Page 89: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 89

Compromise Routing Option forMany Layer Boards

Good Compromise

Reference Plane

Gnd

Vcc1

Lot’s of Decoupling caps near ASIC

Page 90: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 90

Typical Driver/Receiver Currentsswitch IC loadIC

driverVDC

GND

CL

VCC

Z0, vp

GND

IC loadIC

driver

VCC

VCC

charge

logic 0-to-1

Z0, vp

IC loadIC

driver

GND

VCC

0 V

discharge

logic 1-to-0

Z0, vp

Page 91: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 91

Suppose The Trace is Routed Next to Power (not Gnd)

Vcc1

Vcc1

“Fuzzy” Return Path Area

“Fuzzy” Return Path Area

Return Path Options:

-- Decoupling Capacitors

-- Distributed Displacement Current

TEM Transmission Line Area

Page 92: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 92

Suppose The Trace is Routed Next to a DIFFERENT Power (not Gnd)

Return Path Options:

-- Decoupling Capacitors ??? May not be any nearby!!

-- Distributed Displacement Current – Increased current spread!!!

Vcc1

Vcc2

“Fuzzy” Return Path Area

“Fuzzy” Return Path Area

TEM Transmission Line Area

Page 93: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 93

Via SummaryRoute critical signals on either side of ONE reference planeDrop critical signal net to selected layer close to driver/receiver

Many decoupling capacitors to help return currents

Do NOT change reference planes on critical nets unless ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY!!Make sure at least 2 decoupling capacitors within 0.2” of via with critical signals

Page 94: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 94

Mother/Daughter Board Connector Crossing

• Critical Signals must be referenced to same plane on both sides of the connector

Page 95: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 95

Mother/Daughter Board Connector Crossing

Connector Signal Path

GNDPWRSignal

SignalP

WR

GN

DS

ignal

Signal

Page 96: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 96

Return Current from Improper Referencing Across Connector

Connector

De-cap

Signal Path

GNDPWRSignal

SignalP

WR

GN

DS

ignal

Signal

Return Path

De-cap

Displacement Current

Page 97: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 97

Return Current from Proper Referencing Across Connector

PW

RG

ND

Signal

Signal

Connector Signal Path

GNDPWRSignal

Signal

Return Path

Page 98: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 98

Board-to-Board Differential Pair Issues

Connector

PCB Plane 1

PCB Plane 2

Microstrip

Microstrip

VGround-to-Ground

noise

Page 99: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 99

Example Measured Differential Individual Signal-to-GND

Individual Differential Signals ADDED

Common Mode Noise 170 mV P-P

500 mV P-P (each)

Page 100: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 100

Measured GND-to-GND Voltage

205 mV P-P

Page 101: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 101

Antenna StructuresDipole antenna

PCB GND planes

Non-Dipole antenna

Page 102: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 102

Pin Assignment Controls Inductance for CM signals

Signal Pin Related Ground Pins

37.17 nH 25.21 nH

16.85 nH 20.97 nH

(a) (b)

(c) (d)

Page 103: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 103

How Many “Ground” Pins Across Connector ???

• Nothing MAGICAL about “ground”• Return current flow!• Choose the number of power and “ground”

pins based on the number of signal lines referenced to power or “ground” planes

• Insure signals are referenced against same planes on either side of connector

Page 104: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 104

Ground Myth Summary

• THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS “GROUND”

• Define which reference type is needed• Plan the return current path

– Avoid split reference planes & changing reference planes

• Differential signals have significant common mode, and must follow normal EMC rules

Page 105: The “Ground” Myth - IEEEsites.ieee.org/ctx-emcs/files/2010/09/Archambeault-Ground-Myth.pdf · The “Ground” Myth ... t D H J ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ... S21 Skin Effect Loss ONLY--

October 2007 Dr. Bruce Archambeault 105

IEEE