the greenfire journal - jan 04.pdf
TRANSCRIPT
8/13/2019 The Greenfire Journal - JAN 04.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-greenfire-journal-jan-04pdf 1/8
Green Fire JournGrassland Conservat ion News and Commentary
Winter 2004
The Conservation Alliance
of the Great Plains
Bull Riders for Biodiversity? - And Other Heresies for the Northern GrBy Tyler Sutton
The title of this article grew out of a conversation I
had a few weeks ago with Jim Stubbendieck,
rangeland ecologist and Director of the UNL Center for Great Plains Studies. I was at the Center to
participate in a panel discussion about the New
Homestead Act, proposed federal legislation
sponsored by Senator Chuck Hagel and
Congressman Tom Osborne, among others. The Act
is intended to stabilize rural population
economic decline by providing certain
small business benefits to people in higmigration counties -- primarily on the G
At the panel discussion, I said the legis
step in the right direction for federal po
it sought to diversify the region's econo
the moment rests largely on
The Conservation Alliance of the Great Plains is a Lincoln,
Nebraska-based not-for-profit 501 (c) (3) organization dedicated
to preserving and restoring grassland ecosystems through
research, education, and advocacy. We invite you to join us in
creating a sustainable future.
To make a tax-deductible contribution to the Conservation
Alliance, please fill out this form and return it along with your contribution to the address below.
The Conservation Alliance of the Great Plains
P.O. Box 22809
Lincoln, NE 68542-2809
Thank you for your support!
Name: __________________________________
Street: __________________________________
City: _________________________________
State: ________ Zip: ______________________
Phone: _________________________________ E-mail: __________________________________
Contribution Amount:
$25.00 ______ $50.00 _____
$100.00 _____ $250.00 _____
Other: $ ______
How can you help?
Con
Conservation Alliance
of the Great PlainsP.O. Box 22809
Lincoln, NE 68442-2809
www.conservationalliance.org
Inside this issue:
Bull Rider s fo r B iodiver si ty? Page 1
Through the Eyes Page 3
The Burrowing Owl Page 4
Finding Common Ground Page 6
News Notes Page 7
Oceans of Grass Page 8
State of the Planet Page 14
8/13/2019 The Greenfire Journal - JAN 04.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-greenfire-journal-jan-04pdf 2/8
Green Fire Journal
Issue 5 Winter 2004
The Green Fire Journal is published
biannually by the Conservation
Alliance of the Great Plains.
Our mission is to assist in the
creation of protected grassland
natural areas and advance
sustainable communities in the
Northern Great Plains. We wereformed in 1999.
Board of Directors
David Hecker
John LaVelle
Chip Lienemann
Joel Sartore
Russ Semm
Anna Shavers
Tyler Sutton
Executive Director Tyler Sutton
Editor Sarah Duey
Illustrations Paul Johnsgard
Conservation Alliance
of the Great Plains
P.O. Box 22809
Lincoln, NE 68542-2809
Phone: 402-477-2044
Email: [email protected]
www.conservationalliance.org
Inside this issue:
Bull Riders 1
Through the Eyes 3
The Burrowing Owl 4
Finding Common Ground 6
News Notes 7
Oceans of Grass 8
State of the Planet 14
Our lead article this issue is Bull Riders for Biodiversity. It takes head on
the opposition of many ag leaders in the region to changes in land
ownership and use and species protection. It is obvious to anyone who will
look objectively at the issue that the region needs to diversify its economic
dependence on agriculture and that the creation of protected grassland
natural areas can play a role in achieving that objective. Bull Riders argues
that for this to happen the region's ranching leadership must change its
attitudes about grassland conservation and public access to land. Asuggestion those leaders probably won't take kindly too, but something to
contemplate, nevertheless.
In Through the Eyes of Lewis & Clark , the CA's Board Chair Elect, David
Hecker, makes the case that where appropriate the restoration of the plains
wildlife spectacle that was first seen by Lewis & Clark on their expedition
up the Missouri River is an obligation this generation of Americans owes to
future generations.
In this issue we also announce the release of Oceans of Grass, the Northern
Plains Conservation Network's biological assessment of the region. The
Network is twenty-some, loosely affili ated, mostly environmental and
conservation groups. The report identifies the ten top locations in the region
where we believe large-scale grassland conservation should happen. One of
those areas includes the Oglala National Grassland in Sioux County, Nebraska, near Ft. Rob inson.
Rob Gardner, a Medicine Hat, Alberta naturalist, argues in Finding Common
Ground that cooperative approaches to grassland natural resources issues
have the greatest chance of success; a point worth remembering if
conservation groups are to work with local communities to restore the
prairie landscape.
Paul Johnsgard writes a feature article about The Burrowing Owl , a ground
nesting owl species whose fate is linked to that of the prairie dog. You will
definitely learn a lot about the natural history of this interesting prairie
species by reading the Johnsgard article.
Finally, Joel Satore, in his State of the Planet column shares a personal view
of what it means to witness the extinction of species. He also announces a
special exhibit of his work entitled "Fragile Nature" at the UNL Morrill Hall
beginning June 6, 2004.
Please read on to learn more about these and other topics and do not hesitate
to contact me about matters raised in this issue or about other topics we
should cover in the future. [email protected]
Globally, we are
now on the verge
of a massive die
off of species,
something
biologists call
"The Sixth
Extinction." It's
entirely induced
by man. Around
the globe in the
next 50 years,
we'll lose a quarter
of Earth's species.
To be sure, there
are many people
working to save
species and habitats. Several high-profile animals, such
as the black-footed ferret and the California condor, have
been brought back from the brink in truly remarkable
fashion. Once we put our minds to it, anything seems
possible. Even cloning is being thought of as a way to
save species. Believe it or not, a zoo in Spain is bringing
back an extinct species of wild goat using t his technique,
breathing new life into something once thought gone
forever. These victories give us hope and a sense of
confidence that we can fix anything.
But these fixes may be only temporary. For any species
to survive in the long term, we must address two larger
issues. First, the habitat loss that forces most species to
the edge must be addressed. Once we create that
breeding population, where do we put it? Unless good,
usable habitat is preserved or restored, the problem isn't
rectified but merely postponed.
Second, the majority of the voting public simply doesn't
care about the extinction of species. Most are so busy
with work, wages, children, dinner and entertainment
that the subject of this essay is of very little consequence
to them. This is a huge problem.
Until and unless enough people concentrate on saving
what's left of the Earth's habitats, this downward trend
will not change.
But we must get people to care. We are all dependent on
he
eco
sur
cle
an
the
ha
spe
ev
us
wh
It's
I a
ch
ab
wo
eve
humankind's greatest characteristic to s
imagine what can be, and implement c
our salvation, or our undoing. There ar
now than ever before who think like I
This gives me hope.
___________________
Joel Sartore is a frequent contributor
Geographic magazine and is the co-fo
Visit his website at: www.joelsartore.c
Winter 2004Winter 2004Green Fire Journal Gre2
Opening Soon: Morrill Hall on the
campus will feature a new exhibit:
"Fragile Nature:
A Personal View by Joel Sa
Sartore will take you on a personal
understand and witness up close an
the loss of wildlife, from the grizzly
Salt Creek tiger beetle.
Opening June 6, 2004 in the Morril
Cooper Gallery the show will run u
2005. Join Joel and the Friends of
Museum for a special opening even
Saturday evening, June 5th. Conta
Meier, Public Programs Coordinato
Hall for more details, (402) 472-89
Opening StatementBy Tyler Sutton
Spix’s Macaws at the Sau Paulo Zoo, Brazil.
8/13/2019 The Greenfire Journal - JAN 04.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-greenfire-journal-jan-04pdf 3/8
When I was a boy, my parents gave me a bird book that
had a chapter on the extinction of species. In that book
was a single, grainy black and white photograph of
Martha, the last passenger pigeon, alive and staring atthe photographer from her cage at the Cincinnati zoo.
Once numbering in the billions, the passenger pigeon
was the most populous of all birds in North America
until market hunting wiped
them out.
But it turns out Martha was
just the tip of the iceberg.
Though we've lost just a
handful of bird species in
our country, this will all be
changing soon enough. Just
look at what's happening
globally…
In the back of a Brazilian
zoo, past the crowds and the
noise and wind-blown trash,
there is a small gate. If you
work for weeks to get
permission, a solemn
zookeeper will guide you
through it, down several
crumbling steps toward a
dirt road. There, in the
center of a fenced area
under a shade tree, are the
cages. A car blows by,
smothering everything in a
cloud of red dust.
As the haze clears, I peek in.
In these cages are five birds
with blue bodies and ghostly gray heads. They're all
clinging to their wire walls. Between my staring and the
traffic, it's clear they're afraid. These birds are famous.
They are some of the last Spix's macaws left on Earth.
Spix's became well known because just a single male
survived in the Brazilian wild until a few years ago.
Now there are just 58 birds in captivity, scattered around
the world.
The Spix is not alone. There are many examples now of
species that represent the living dead. There's the
Galapagos tortoise
subspecies named
'Lonesome George' who's
the last of his kind at the
Darwin Center in the
Galapagos Islands. His
subspecies is down to one
living animal. He will
spend his days in a pen at
the Darwin Center until
the end comes for him
and his entire geneticheritage.
There are fish, turtles and
frogs, insects, you name
it, all making their last
stands in outback mud
puddles or under the
glare of heat lamps in
forgotten laboratories.
Each has an amazing
story to tell, but most will
die in obscurity.
Last year at the Houston
Zoo, I witnessed a prime
example of how
extinction happens. In a
keeper's cramped office,
several pairs of the critically endangered Wyoming toad
sit and stare. Biologists are desperately trying to breed
them. There are none left in the wild and just a handful
in captivity.
Winter 2004Winter 2004Green Fire Journal14
The Face of Extinction
In my travels as an attorney for one of the nation's largest
construction companies, I am often struck by how much
the hand of man has changed the natural landscape. As
we enter the twenty-first century, it is time to reflect, and
take seriously, landscape scale efforts to preserve and
protect what is left of America's rich natural heritage and
to restore what was lost where feasible. There is no
better place to embark on this
journey than the Northern Great
Plains.
In May of 2004, we will
observe the 201st anniversary
of Lewis & Clark's epic
exploration of the geography,
ethnology and natural history of
the Missouri River and its
tributaries. As Lewis & Clark traversed parts of what became
Nebraska, the Dakotas, and
Montana, they observed many
forms of previously
undocumented flora and fauna.
Their journals described oceans
of grass, and vast buffalo herds,
antelope and other species.
Unfortunately, today, the wildlife spectacle they observed
has mostly disappeared. However, an opportunity now
exists to create an ecologically and economically viable
series of protected grassland natural areas on portions of what is left of the ecosystem. Global economic forces at
work in the region require us to consider innovative
changes to past land-use policies.
The diversity and abundance of wildlife that could
inhabit a series of protected grassland natural areas has
been described as exceeding that found today in
Yellowstone National Park. We c
this opportunity by working with
tribes that seek to diversify their e
land-use change.
However, to create a managemen
to support and allow for the move
includin
deer, she
require t
participa
owners.
enrollme
preserve
require a
managem
area. It
in state aspending
from urb
affected
be easy
the work
can we r
opportun
I do not
the Board Chair Elect for the CA,
talking to people in this r egion an
country about ways to work with
tribes in the Northern Great Plain protected grassland natural areas.
Americans deserve the opportunit
once seen though the eyes of Lew
_________________
David Hecker is a senior attorney
Kiewit Construction Company, bu
individual capacity.
Through the Eyes of Lewis and Clark:
Create Grassland Natural Areas for NGPState of the Planet-Sartore Style
By Joel Sartore
By David Hecker
Passenger pigeon - mounted specimen at Morril Hall
Swift Fox
8/13/2019 The Greenfire Journal - JAN 04.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-greenfire-journal-jan-04pdf 4/8
Winter 2004
wildlife conservation, whereas private land conservation
simply does not.
Ranchers need not fear their way of life will disappear.
Cattle will still be king in the region, with the
overwhelming majority of the region's grasslands used
for cattle production for generations to come.
Professor Stubbendieck shares my interests in protecting
and restoring biodiversity on the plains,the future of rural areas and, as I
discovered, rodeo. So I jested he should
form a group called Bull Riders for
Biodiversity to start a dialogue with
urban dwellers on ways to solve the
region's economic and ecological
problems. I was thinking of Bull Riders
for Biodiversity as a metaphor for new,
more enlightened (at least from a
biodiversity perspective) ranching
leadership that would build bridges to
urban conservationists so the two groups
could develop a common agenda. Hesaid it might be a good idea but it would
be a very small group right now. This is
unfortunate because in my opinion,
stabilizing small towns while protecting
the region's biodiversity will take
inordinately longer and be much more
difficult unless agricultural interests,
mainly ranchers, come to realize they
must become leaders in the effort to preserve the region's
biodiversity. At the same time, over the long term, I
believe the economic survival of ranching itself is tied to
changing the way ranchers manage their land and get
paid for it.
The New Homestead Act should become part of a
broader conservation agenda of national and global
significance. While support for agricultural subsidies
may be waning, support for conservation spending
remains high and will probably grow. We need to think
bigger than just the New Homestead Act. We need to
think in terms of a Northern Great Plains Restoration
Act, a comprehensive land re stora
revitalization policy tailored to th
region.
But who is going to provide the le
people in the region themselves a
these issues, who in the nation is
happens on the Northern Great Pl
small towns going to speak out ab
stewardshi
small town
their short-
to risk offe
constituent
conclusion
leadership
ranching co
likely scen
Great Plain
continue to
economic a
When all isis ranchers
future on th
Plains. The
outcome, s
timetable.
critical to g
of restoring
ecologicall
______________________
Editor's Notes: This article is a c
what Sutton presented at the UNL
Studies (CGS) Fall Seminar Serie
and was prepared by Pam MurrayWe express our gratitude to Dr. M
Director of the CGS for the oppor
remarks and to Ms. Murray for h
in preparing this version. For a c
article with references, contact th
222 Keim Hall, P.O. Box 830953,
0953 or the CA's office.
The inescapable
conclusion is that
unless new
leadership develops
soon in the ranching
community, the most
likely scenario on the
Northern Great
Plains is that theregion will continue
to die a slow, painful,
economic and
ecological death.
Burrowing owls, like Westerners generally, tend to be
obstinately independent and generally refuse to obey the
rules of owl decorum set out for them. First, they do not
move about mostly at night in the usual manner of owls,
but instead are active mainly during bright daylight.
Secondly, unlike the larger owls of the grasslands,
burrowing owl are surprisingly insectivorous, at leastduring summer months when large, slow-moving insects
such as dung beetles and ground beetles are abundant
around prairie dog towns and are easily captured.
Thirdly, burrowing owls seem to lack the acute binaural
hearing and precise sound-source
localization abilities that owls as a
group are primarily noted for and,
instead, appear to rely on their keen
daytime vision for prey-finding.
Given these traits, one might think
that burrowing owl is only a second-
rate member of the Strigidae. That
is, until one is seen in life for the
very first time.
Few birds will bring bird-watchers screeching their car
to a halt faster than will a burrowing owl perched quietly
on a fencepost, or peering quizzically out of a prairie
dog hole. There is something in the animal's intense
yellowish green eyes that demand to be watched with
equal intensity, and its comical, not-quite-erect stance
might remind one of a spindly-legged, feather-clad
leprechaun still trying to recover from last-night's
hangover.
Often, after a few slight horizontal or vertical head
movements by the bird, as if trying to shake its head
clear of a foggy memory, but which are probably
designed to get a better distance-estimating fix on the
new intruder into its personal space, the owl will
probably either duck back into its hole or if perched on a
post may perhaps take silent flight over the prairie dog
town and land near its own personalized burrow
entrance. Although a burrowing owl is perfectly content
to take over a prairie dog burrow without making major
structural changes or other renovations, it is likely to
gather nearby pieces of dried bison or cattle dung, break
them into small pieces, and line the entrance area in
front of its burrow with these bits of debris. Such
markings help one to recognize an active burrowing owl
burrow, as do the dried owl pellets that are usually rich
in chitinous insect fragments such as the undigested
exoskeletal remnants of grasshoppers and scarab and
carabid beetles. The function of the scattered ungulate
droppings is uncertain, but they may help mask the odorsof an active owl burrow, for burrowing owls are just as
vulnerable to badgers as are prairie dogs, and badgers
seem to find young burrowing owls just as tasty as baby
prairie dogs. Gregory Green and Robert Anthony found
that, next to desertion, badgers were
the most significant source of
burrowing owl nesting mortality, but
that nests lined with livestock dung
were significantly less prone to
predation than unlined nests. On the
other hand, it has also been
suggested that the dung simply
serves to attract dung beetles, which
are an important summer food for
the owls.
The burrowing owl is the only strongly migratory owl of
the northern plains, presumably because its insect foods
become progressively unavailable in fall. Then it turns
increasingly to small rodents such as pocket mice for
food, but I once saw an adult burrowing owl dragging a
dead thirteen-lined ground squirrel over the ground
toward its burrow. I suspect it was simply cashing in on
a road kill, as the ground squirrel's body weight (5-9
ounces) would be somewhat heavier than the owl itself
(about 5 ounces), and it is hard to imagine any
burrowing owl quite so ambitious as to take on a healthy
ground squirrel. Although small mammals and birds
make up a small percentage of the summer diet as
measured by their sheer number, the much larger bodymass of mammals relative to insects tends to make
mammals comprise the predominant portion of the
biomass of all foods taken. Furthermore, there is some
owl activity at night, especially during bright moonlit
nights, and at that time nocturnal mammals such as voles
and heteromyid mice, rather than insects, would be the
most likely targets. Frogs, toads, lizards, snakes and even
turtles have also been reported as burrowing owl foods.
Winter 2004Green Fire Journal4
The Burrowing Owl By Paul Johnsgard
8/13/2019 The Greenfire Journal - JAN 04.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-greenfire-journal-jan-04pdf 5/8
Winter 2004Green Fire Journal12
wages and high infrastructure costs. These newly created
areas would be open to hunting, fishing, hiking,
horseback riding, wildlife viewing, and tribal cultural
practices, but even high quality tourism would be a
secondary motivation for communities to create these
areas. The areas would be community assets first, much
like urban parks and open space are for cities that want
to attract highly skilled people. Only secondarily would
these areas be for tourism. Right now, most communities
on the Northern Great Plains areenclaves, surrounded by an
inaccessible landscape, used in ways
most Americans do not find
attractive.
I suggested that the initial focus of
such a strategy should logically be
the National Grasslands because they
are already publicly owned. There are
nearly three million acres of National
Grasslands in the states of Nebraska,
the Dakotas and Wyoming. Nearby
communities should work to create
special management areas for the
National Grasslands using
community-based land trusts and
innovative public-private partnerships
to own land, acquire conservation
easements and set wildlife
management objectives. If local projects were part of a
region-wide effort to protect 10-15% of the eco-region,
the effort would be nationally and globally significant.
The creation of these areas would have direct economic
benefits. The land trusts would attract private
conservation capital to purchase land from willing
sellers, thereby providing a buyer to landowners whowished to sell land to a conservation purchaser.
Local people would benefit from jobs created to manage
the lands on a day-to-day basis. Other business
opportunities would be associated with the change in
land use, from prairie restoration contractors to nature-
based tours, guiding and outfitting, horseback riding,
lodges and similar businesses.
These areas would also potentially benefit from a shift in
future spending under the Farm Bill, as world trade
pressures lead to reductions in agricultural subsidies.
Conservation spending may be the only way to avoid a
catastrophic collapse in federal payments to the region.
In fact, this may be the most compelling reason to begin
thinking seriously about this strategy.
Research dollars from universities,non-governmental organizations and
other institutions that want to study
the restorative effort would also
undoubtedly flow to the local
economy. And, yes, the areas would
be targets for state and federal
spending relating to species of
concern and to develop outdoor
recreation opportunities. But beyond
the direct economic benefits, these
areas would be a reason for people to
stay in the region's small
communities and for people to movethere to retire or start entrepreneurial
businesses. Research has shown that
those communities in sparsely
populated areas that have access to
natural amenities, which these areas
would be, do better economically and demographically
than areas without access to these natural features.
I also observed at the panel discussion that the region
had some impressive national conservation partners such
as the World Wildlife Fund and The Nature Conservancy
that are willing to work with communities if such a
public policy goal were established and communities
started working locally for such an initiative.
From a conservation perspective, setting aside 10-15% of
the region is no substitute for good private land
conservation. But shifting the management objective on
10-15% of the land from cattle to biodiversity has the
potential to capture the nation's imagination and turn its
attention to the possibility the region has for large-scale
Conservation
spending may be the
only way to avoid a
catastrophic collapse
in federal payments
to the region. In fact,
this may be the most
compelling reason to
begin thinking seriously about this
strategy.
Besides using prairie dog burrows, burrowing owls have
also occasionally adapted to living in burrows made by
marmots, badgers, foxes (swift, kit and red), coyotes,
skunks, armadillos, kangaroo rats, and tortoises. They
may also dig their own burrows in the absence of
available housing already provided by burrowing
mammals. They have even been found using natural
rock cavities and human-made artificial burrows where
natural excavations are not possible. Yet, on the Great
Plains is it primarily the black-tailed prairie dog that
offers the owls housing. In an unpublished study byShawn Conrad and others, it was estimated that 95
percent of all the burrowing owls nesting on the
Comanche, Cimarron, Rita Blanca and Kiowa National
Grasslands, all located on
the Southern Great Plains,
were directly associated
with prairie dog towns.
Only three of 114 the
prairie dog towns
supporting burrowing
owls were inactive,
indicating the importance
of prairie dog activity in
making good owl
breeding sites. The three
inactive towns supporting
burrowing owls had
apparently been inactive
for only one year.
Likewise, among 543
burrowing owl nests found
in the Oklahoma Panhandle, 66 percent were found
within black-tailed prairie dog colonies. Besides being
able to exploit the inactive dog burrows, the owls favor
the combination of low shrub coverage, short vegetation
and high percentage of bare ground that are typically
present in prairie dog colonies. Where the ground-level
vision is variously obstructed, the birds always find
suitable nearby observation posts to use, such asfenceposts, boulders or utility poles.
Within prairie dog towns, burrowing owls favor larger
and active colonies; typically a town that has been
abandoned by prairie dogs will also be abandoned by
burrowing owls within three years, largely as a result of
encroachment of dense vegetation but also because of
the gradual deterioration of the burrows themselves.
Within active towns, the owls ofte
periphery of the colony, where th
abundance of insects, more availa
a proximity to foraging areas. Bur
favor sites offering several "satell
both adults and young, perhaps to
As many as five such satellite bur
single owl family.
For the Great Plains as a whole, J
have reported that burrowing owl
prairie dog colonies was lower in
Plains National Grasslands (59 pe
in those of the Southern Great Pla
Regardless of geographic location
f
t
g
o
t
a
c
b
b
d
lt
r
a
s
b
o
exploit the efficient warning syste
when predators approach and the
attract dung beetles and other foo
evidence that the prairie dogs dire
presence of burrowing owls. It m
argued that nature-loving humans
presence of burrowing owls, and
prairie dog towns are we likely al
burrowing owl as another icon of
__________________
Adapted from an unpublished boo
prairie dog ecosystem, which is p
by the University of Nebraska Pre
an Emeritus Professor of Biology
Nebraska.
Winter 2004
Burrowing Owl
8/13/2019 The Greenfire Journal - JAN 04.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-greenfire-journal-jan-04pdf 6/8
Green Fire Journal Winter 2004 Winter 20046
In 1987, Brundtland urged the people of the world toachieve sustainability by searching for common ground -those aspects of our future that all citizens cherish. Adecade later, the University of Nebraska hosted a major conference with a similar theme. Now, progress towardsustainability is not obvious on the northern plains, eventhough recent changes in economic conditions may have
increased the opportunities.Why can't we work together on the grassland?
Conflict resolution experts state that a key first step toconciliation is for each party to recognize and validatethe beliefs of the other.Even if we do not agreewith the position, we mustrecognize that others feelthat way. Or, in the words of a western philosopher, "If we don't all hang together,we will all hang separately."
And this seems to be thecurrent situation, with both
the ranching community andwildlife supporters holdingstrong, opposing views inthe face of declininggrassland.
Many environmentalists believe that the use of private property and i ts resources can s trongly affect the wayothers use their own property, and the landowner,therefore, has significant obligations to the general public. More specifically, environmentalists value theintrinsic rights of wild animals to live their livesunfettered, as well as, in many cases, the right of thegeneral public to access the wildlife.
The isolated and self-reliant lifestyle of the rancher hasstressed the importance of the individual over society. At
the same time, the similar adversity faced by all ruralresidents has forged communities of a strength rarelyfound in urban centers. Land is the foundationsupporting rural culture.
Government plays an important role that may not bespecifically recognized. Balancing new demands for theuse of public land with the traditional uses is tough, anda shrinking budget makes it tougher. Public policies areincreasingly influenced by agribusiness, sometimes at
the expense of traditional family operations.
So with this apparent gulf separating the stakeholders,where can we build bridges?
Perhaps grassland leaders need to look deeper, to thecore values held by all stakeholders. If we can recognizethose common beliefs, then we can gradually extend the
agreement to include more specific actions.My experience suggests that the common values focuson a love for the wild landscape and the animals in it,and, most importantly, recognition of the many benefits
of the native vegetation.At a practical level, allagree that the dramaticincrease in both smallholdings and giantcorporate farms hasnegative effects on thegrassland. Energydevelopment, especiallythe wasteful extraction of coalbed methane, is seen
as a threat to bothranching and grasslandecology.
These concepts are thestart of a partnership.
Let's fill our proposals with words that resonate with both groups; words like heritage, stewardship,community and native grass.
Let's build on everyone's desire to spend tax dollarsefficiently by directing agricultural support toenvironmentally friendly landowners. This practice iswidespread in Europe.
At the same time, we must recognize that we havedifferences.
But partnerships will grow if we concentrate on thecommon ground. Let's use cooperation and economicincentives to help the land managers achieve our immediate targets.
____________________
Rob Gardner is a grassland naturalist based in Medicine Hat, Alberta, and believes in cooperative approaches toconserving natural resources. For more information, goto eidnet.or /local/ rassland
Finding Common Groundcontinue to grip the region's politics, and in my view,
limit the region's economic development as well as
conservation options.
I mean no disrespect here. The ranchers' historic struggle
with the forces of nature is to be admired in many
respects, as is their reluctance to plow the region's
grasslands. There are, however, aspects of the cattle
culture that are very troublesome as we contemplate the
future of the plains, particularly thefuture of the region's biodiversity and
small communities.
The cattle culture's definition of
stewardship is obviously very narrow.
It basically includes caring for and
protecting only those parts of the
prairie grassland ecosystem that it
perceives as not competing for grass
or interfering with the production of
cattle. It also is hostile to the idea of
public access to land and is
contemptuous of government
involvement in land ownership or
management.
To be fair, ranchers struggle to exist
within an industrial society and a
corporate enterprise system that
places severe limitat ions on how they
can operate. Ranchers do not get paid
to manage wildlife and biodiversity;
they only get paid what packer-
dominated markets yield. Further, the
cattle culture is not alone it its war on
nature. However, it has had a
significant role in fundamentally
altering the region's grassland ecosystems, and I believe
it must come to terms with that role for the region to
recover from our collective mistakes.
In my panel presentation, I argued the New Homestead
Act should be improved by providing incentives to
change the way a portion of land in the region is owned
and used. I believe it will lead to a
economy, as well as a more diverse
prairie landscape. This is not a radi
idea of merging the protection of b
economic development that benefit
basic to appli ed conservation as we
Century.
Rural development advocates are s
how community projects can ben
towns. On balan
development pr
ownership and u
slow to develop
because most pe
such alternative
feasible given th
current attitudes
Notwithstanding
wisdom, at the
suggested that p
Great Plains sho
the idea of mak
goal to put 10-1
into permanent
conservation are
would be manag
wildlife. Presen
of the region is
(conservation ar
and globally, tem
the terrestrial ha
from human exp
of the country m
oceans, but this miles of open space still covered in
spectacular prairie grasses, an esse
for restoring the ecological health o
These areas would not be traditiona
they encourage the type of tourism
parks, which o ften is high volume
By Rob Gardner
Notwithstanding this
conventional wisdom,
at the panel
discussion I
suggested that people
in the Northern Great
Plains should
actively support the
idea of making it a public policy goal to
put 10-15% of the
eco-region into
permanent grassland
conservation areas.
These areas would be
managed primarily
for wildlife.
8/13/2019 The Greenfire Journal - JAN 04.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-greenfire-journal-jan-04pdf 7/8
Winter 2004Winter 2004Green Fire Journal10
agriculture. I suggested, however, the New Homestead
Act could be improved by providing incentives to
change the way some land in the region is used.
Perhaps the biggest impediment to moving federal policy
in this direction is the region's own attitudes and beliefs
about land use and stewardship. I have titled my remarks
"Bull Riders for Biodiversity" to metaphorically and
respectfully suggest that people in the region need to
reexamine these attitudes and beliefsif we are to solve the region's
ecological and economic problems.
Such a reexamination is necessary
because economically, agriculture
alone is unable to sustain the
Northern Great Plains (northwestern
Nebraska, western North and South
Dakotas, and eastern Montana and
Wyoming).
Modern agriculture in this region is
heavily subsidized, yet the Northern
Great Plains is one of the poorest
regions in the country. In 2001 sevenof the twelve poorest counties in the
nation were in Nebraska, and all of
them rely heavily on the livestock economy. In the
recent past, the federal policy response to the region's
economic woes was more agricultural subsidies in one
form or another, whether commodity payments, drought
relief, or irrigation projects. These subsidies have not
stemmed the exodus of people from rural areas -- just
fueled farm and ranch expansion, thereby accelerating
rural community decline. As agricultural units got
bigger, people left agriculture, but at the same time, the
economic base of small towns deteriorated further, which
led to greater out-migration.
I am not suggesting, nor do most rural advocates
suggest, we simply eliminate agricultural subsidies to
help rural communities. What I am saying is that many
people have begun to question the importance of these
subsidies to federal rural policy and the importance of
the agricultural economy to the region's future.
At the same time that people are leaving and the
economy is in a tailspin, ecologically, the Northern Great
Plains is also in real trouble. Perhaps 40% of its
grasslands has been converted to crop production. Native
prairie continues to be converted to crops, mainly
because of Farm Bill subsidies.
The majority of plant and animal species that are
endemic, and thus dependent on the region, are in
trouble. Grassland birds have shownsteeper, more consistent, and more
geographically widespread declines
than any other behavioral grouping of
North American species, according to
a report by The Nature Conservancy.
Thirty-four species of flora and fauna
are considered globally imperiled, and
of these, ten are listed as threatened or
endangered, and four are proposed for
listing.
Of course, the landscape today is just
a shadow of what it once was when
Lewis and Clark made their way upthe Missouri River. Even 150 years
ago, the abundance of wildlife and
prairie grasslands in the Northern Great Plains rivaled
Africa's Serengeti. But since then, millions of buffalo
were senselessly slaughtered. Wild buffalo and all the
large predators that once depended on them were
extirpated from the region, as were the elk and Big Horn
Sheep, though recently some of these species have made
a comeback in places. Today prairie dog numbers have
been radically reduced and many species associated with
the prairie dog ecosystem are in trouble.
In short, the "cattle culture" that evolved with the
transformation of the plains has not been kind to the
living creatures that it perceived as competing with it.
By "cattle culture" I mean a set of shared attitudes and
beliefs that are common in the region among people on
the land, though they certainly are not found only among
people engaged in agriculture. But these attitudes and
beliefs are part of the mythology of ranching; they
CA Governance - The CA recently took someimportant steps to provide for its future. The Boardreduced its size from 12 members to 7, with theexpectation the Board will focus even more energy onfundraising, and will strengthen the capacity of theAdvisory Board in 2004 to provide scientific andtechnical input to program work. Russ Semm, a LincolnENT physician, became Board Chair and will lead our
fundraising activities in 2004. David Hecker, a senior attorney with the Omaha based Kiewit ConstructionCompany, became Chair elect and will lead thoseactivities in 2005. The CA will continue to advance
public policy positions for the creation of protectedgrassland natural areas on the Northern Great Plainsthrough community-based efforts and for theconservation of prairie grassland wildlife. In the future,the CA will do more to build local capacity to createthese areas and to publicize the global importance of thetemperate grassland ecosystem, the least protectedterrestrial biome on the planet.
Reichert to Chair CA Advisory Board -Amy Reichert will Chair the CA's Advisory Board. As
Advisory Board Chair, she will work closely with theCA's Board of Directors to help guide the development
of its program work.
Reichert received a Ph.D. in Geography (emphasis in biogeography) from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln(UNL). Presently she is the Director of the MidwestConsortium for Service Learning in Higher Education,which is housed on the UNL campus, and for the pasttwo years served as an Assistant Professor at MinnesotaState University, Mankato.
Her research interests are geographical methods andtechniques, spatial patterns in wildlife habitat, andhuman perceptions of wildlife. "My education, teaching,and research experiences lead me to believe strongly in
the value of community-based conservation projects,"Reichert said recently on accepting the Chair position."My top priority as Chair is to recruit motivatedindividuals who want to do research and share ideasconcerning the benefits of a system of community basedgrassland natural areas on the Northern Great Plains.Throughout the globe natural areas have enhanced ruraleconomic opportunity. There is every reason to believethey can do the same on the Northern Great Plains."
Ponca Earthlodge Updateearth lodge in Nebraska's Niobrara
complete. A thousand plus labor h
red cedar trees, river willows and p
combined to create the superstructu
Dozens of volunteers from the Trib
worked for a week cutting and pro
400 trees starting in the fall of 200volunteers returned for a few week
finished the lodge. Inside of the lo
hearth, an altar and sleeping bench
Tribal members dedicated the lodg
2003. A public ceremony will ma
lodge in the spring of 2004.
It stands on the first parcel of land
Tribe after restoration (approximat
of Niobrara State Park.) This is an
"place" for the Poncas, and is likel
Poncas' Gray Blanket village visite
Clark Expedition. Today it is the c
Tribe: it is the home of their poww
remodeled Agency building (Natio
status), their historic cemetery and
bison and restored prairie. The com
lodge adds to the places where Tri
connect with their past.
For more information on the lodge
Wendzillo, Director of Cultural Aff
Nebraska. P.O. Box 288, Niobrara
857-3391.
O'Brien Event Success - L
O'Brien, South Dakota bison ranch
to a standing room only gathering a
Plains Studies on the UNL campus
bison ranching and his efforts to re
land in South Dakota. Jill Magqui
South Dakota's premier chefs prep
featuring the cuisine of the Norther
about 50 people at the Country Clu
O'Brien in attendance as the CA's
Magquire is interested in defining
her innovative recipes and style of
N E W S N O T E S
In short, the
"cattle culture" that
evolved with the
transformation of the
plains has not been
kind to the living
creatures that it
perceived as
competing with it.
Continued from page 1
8/13/2019 The Greenfire Journal - JAN 04.pdf
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/the-greenfire-journal-jan-04pdf 8/8
Winter 2004Green Fire Journal8
Oceans of Grass Released"Oceans of Grass," (Oceans) a grassland conservation assessment for the NorthernGreat Plains, will be released in Calgary, Alberta at the 7th Prairie Conservation
and Endangered Species Conference on February 26th 2004. Oceans is produced by the Northern Plains Conservation Network (NPCN), a loose affiliation of 20
some conservation and environmental groups working in the eco-region.
Though it was a collaborative effort, the World Wildlife Fund's (WWF) team of scientists was largely responsible for putting the document together. Tyler Sutton,
the CA's President, chaired the group's Steering Committee during the preparation
of the report.
The goal of the Oceans of Grass assessment was to first provide an inventory and
status-report on the region's flora and fauna and then to make conservationrecommendations to foster the return of grassland wildlife as natural components of the landscape.
The assessment found that the Northern Great Plains is no longer a naturallyfunctioning ecosystem. Given the degradation, NPCN's conservationrecommendations took a long term view, and were guided by four principles:
1. The importance of private landconservation, including
fostering stewardship of private lands, developing
incentives for private
land conservation, andacquiring land for
conservation at fair market value fromwilling sellers;
2. That the land and itswildlife are importantculturally and spiritually
for many NorthAmerican native people,
a growing demographicgroup that is already
renewing its relationshipwith the land;
3. That a healthy and
diverse economy basedon agriculture and naturecan provide can provide
a more resilienteconomic base for theregion than either alone.
4. The importance of partnerships with local
communities in achievingthe vision.
World Parks Conference
Focuses on Africa
The IUNC-The World
Conservation Union held its
5th World Congress on
Protected Areas in Durban,
South Africa last Fall. The
Congress brought together
some 3000 delegates
representing a diverse rangeof countries, interests and
experiences in protected
areas to exchange
information and chart a
course for the global
protected areas community
during the next decade.
Two important outcomes
from the Congress were the
Durban Accord, a succinct
statement for the future of
protected areas, and the
Durban Action Plan, a set of
32 specific recommendationsto advance the protected
areas' agenda. These
documents and further
information on the
conference may we found at
www.iucn.org/themes/wcpa/
wpc2003/index.htm
One important announcement
was the launching of the
Africa Protected Areas
Initiative, a major program to
develop a system of
protected areas fo r Africa
that will meet the
environmental and social
needs of the continent. South
Africa also announced the
creation of new national
parks and favo rable tax
treatment for private land
conservation areas.
Winter 2004 G
While private land conservation will be important, with less than 1.5
percent of the eco-region in areas designated primarily for biodivesity
conservation, Oceans highlighted the necessity of working across
public and p rivate land boundaries to accomplish landscape-scale
conservation.
The study identified 10 ecologically significant terrestrial conservation
areas in the U.S. and Canadian plains that could form core areas for
large-scale landscape restoration efforts. One of those regions is the
Oglala, Buffalo Gap and Thunder Basin National Grasslands in
Nebraska, South Dakota and Wyoming, respectively. This is a region
previously iden tified by the CA as worthy of large-scale conservation
attention. The Oglala National Grassland is just north of Ft. Robinson
in Sioux County, Nebraska.
In addition to identifying potential conservation areas, the assessment
recommended setting aside 10-15% of the region in areas managed
primarily for biodiversity, thought it also affirmed the necessity o f
working with local communities to accomplish this goal. Another
suggestion was the restoration of at least two herds of 10,000 bison.
The Oceans report may be obtained by contacting the
World Wildlife Fund, P.O. Box 7276, Bozeman, MT
59771; [email protected]; 406-582-0235
Article Featur
Concessions to P
The Fall 2003 issuePractice, a publicati
Conservation Biolo
on the conservation to protecting biodiv
evolving concept us
where a conservatiointo a management
government or comm
providing the ownecommercial logging
the conservation orgland for biodiversity
Would this concept
of the Northern GreFor example, a loca
could enter into a loSugar Loaf Grazing
that controls nearly
rights on the Oglala Northern Sioux Cou
provide for paymenAssociation and privimprove manageme
private grasslands fleaving the landown
day-to-day managem
land.
Such an arrangemen
grassland natural arthousand acres, whi
significant, while le
biologically sound gfamily ranchers. At
lease, it could be ren
land could be sold torganization. If the
statewide support, treceive favorable ta
Nebraska Natural L
want to consider thistrategy in its plann
the magazine may b
www.conbio.org/in