the future of monitoring and evaluation: lessons from a decade of impact evaluations

24
The Future of Monitoring and Evaluation: Lessons from a Decade of Impact Evaluations Eric Foster-Moore The World Bank | Africa Water Resources [email protected]

Upload: eze

Post on 24-Feb-2016

23 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

The Future of Monitoring and Evaluation: Lessons from a Decade of Impact Evaluations. Eric Foster-Moore The World Bank | Africa Water Resources [email protected]. Our project will directly benefit 400,000 people … Our project will benefit the people of Mozambique … - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Future of Monitoring and Evaluation:  Lessons from a Decade  of Impact Evaluations

The Future of Monitoring and Evaluation: Lessons from a Decade of Impact Evaluations

Eric Foster-MooreThe World Bank | Africa Water Resources

[email protected]

Page 2: The Future of Monitoring and Evaluation:  Lessons from a Decade  of Impact Evaluations

Development works

Our project will directly benefit 400,000 people…

Our project will benefit the people of Mozambique…

Number of women benefitted

Growth rate in country X increased by 2 percentage points

Page 3: The Future of Monitoring and Evaluation:  Lessons from a Decade  of Impact Evaluations

Art credit: @ChrisPlanicka

“No it won’t.”

“$195 billion in aid per year for 20 years would

eliminate poverty.”

Jeffrey SachsBig Push, Millennium Villages Project, The End of Poverty

William Easterly

The White Man’s BurdenDead Aid by Dambisa MoyoCan the West Save Africa?The white band’s burden…

Page 4: The Future of Monitoring and Evaluation:  Lessons from a Decade  of Impact Evaluations

1. Is aid effective?2. How do we know? 3. How do we apply this to our own work?

Three questions

Page 5: The Future of Monitoring and Evaluation:  Lessons from a Decade  of Impact Evaluations

Boone (1996): Nope.

Does aid increase growth? A macro perspective

Burnside and Dollar (2002). It depends. Effective when combined with “good policy.”

Easterly, Levine, and Roodman (2003). Not really.

Page 6: The Future of Monitoring and Evaluation:  Lessons from a Decade  of Impact Evaluations

Original Burnside-Dollar results

Page 7: The Future of Monitoring and Evaluation:  Lessons from a Decade  of Impact Evaluations

Easterly, Levine, and Roodman

Page 8: The Future of Monitoring and Evaluation:  Lessons from a Decade  of Impact Evaluations

Boone (1996): Nope.

Does aid increase growth? A macro perspective

Burnside and Dollar (2002). It depends. Effective when combined with “good policy.”

Easterly, Levine, and Roodman (2003). Not really.

Clemens, Radelet, Bhavnani, and Bazzi (2012). It still depends.

(Chris Blattman)

Page 9: The Future of Monitoring and Evaluation:  Lessons from a Decade  of Impact Evaluations

What about at the micro level?

Often just make them up: “This project will directly benefit 300,000 people.”

Move beyond correlations. Establish causality. Do an experiment. Some are natural, some are contrived

Natural experiment: half of a community displaced by a reservoir

Contrived experiment: the Fiala (2013) paper

Page 10: The Future of Monitoring and Evaluation:  Lessons from a Decade  of Impact Evaluations

Grants, loans, training, or a combo?

Fiala (2013):

Stimulating Microenterprise Growth: Results from a Loans, Grants, and Training Experiment in Uganda

Page 11: The Future of Monitoring and Evaluation:  Lessons from a Decade  of Impact Evaluations

Loans Loans plus training Cash Cash plus training Control

Treatment groups:

Follow up surveys after 6 and 9 months.

Page 12: The Future of Monitoring and Evaluation:  Lessons from a Decade  of Impact Evaluations

Loan only: effect is gone after nine months

Loans and training: 54 percent increase in profits for men Grant only: no effect whatsoever. For men, Fiala speculates, “Knowing that

the loan had to be repaid appears to have led them to use the money more effectively in the business.”

Grants and training: no effect

Women: no positive effects. “Family pressure on women appears to have significant negative effects on business investment decisions: married women with family nearby perform worse than the control group in a number of the interventions.”

Results

Page 13: The Future of Monitoring and Evaluation:  Lessons from a Decade  of Impact Evaluations

What is the effect of institutions on economic performance?

Acemoglu, Johnson, and Robinson (2000): The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development

Page 14: The Future of Monitoring and Evaluation:  Lessons from a Decade  of Impact Evaluations

Methods

Stronginstitutions

Strong economic performance

Other stuff

Instrumental variable

Page 15: The Future of Monitoring and Evaluation:  Lessons from a Decade  of Impact Evaluations

Hypothesis

Page 16: The Future of Monitoring and Evaluation:  Lessons from a Decade  of Impact Evaluations

“Differences in institutions account for roughly three quarters of the differences in income per capita.”

Not driven by outliers such as the United States, Canada, Australia, etc.

Not driven by simply being on the African continent.

Not driven by distance from the equator (i.e. geography).

Results

Page 17: The Future of Monitoring and Evaluation:  Lessons from a Decade  of Impact Evaluations

Compare program alternatives Quantify effects of program X in place Z at time T Force you to identify and test assumptions Microfinance, cash transfers, education, health, job

training, etc.

What RCTs do really well:

Page 18: The Future of Monitoring and Evaluation:  Lessons from a Decade  of Impact Evaluations

What you see: Policy and legal frameworks

strengthened Cash collection ratio; debts repaid Number of people in project area with

access to “Improved Water Sources” Percent of biological samples failing Number of direct beneficiaries, percent

of which are female Number of staff trained

Monitoring and evaluation: some examples

What you don’t see: Household income Business profitability Governance Strength of political parties Comparison to other

interventions Opportunity cost Articulation of assumptions

Page 19: The Future of Monitoring and Evaluation:  Lessons from a Decade  of Impact Evaluations

1. There’s an entire sector of projects that don’t get tested and where assumptions that are probably decades old dominate. Let’s bring the lessons of impact evaluation to these projects.

2. Need to be strategic about their application in order to learn something about human behavior.

Two problems with RCTs

Page 20: The Future of Monitoring and Evaluation:  Lessons from a Decade  of Impact Evaluations

1. Is aid effective? 2. How do we know? 3. How do we apply this to our own work?

Three questions

Page 21: The Future of Monitoring and Evaluation:  Lessons from a Decade  of Impact Evaluations

Backup

Page 22: The Future of Monitoring and Evaluation:  Lessons from a Decade  of Impact Evaluations

Solow model of growth

Page 23: The Future of Monitoring and Evaluation:  Lessons from a Decade  of Impact Evaluations

From E-L-R (2003)

Page 24: The Future of Monitoring and Evaluation:  Lessons from a Decade  of Impact Evaluations

From AJR