the future of energy fred loxsom eastern connecticut state university

49
The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University

Upload: myrtle-paul

Post on 12-Jan-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University

The Future of Energy

Fred Loxsom

Eastern Connecticut State University

Page 2: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University

Atmospheric CO2 is rising.GHG concentration is rising

Page 3: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University

Environmental changes have been observed

Page 4: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University

Global Climate is Changing

Page 5: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University

Impacts may be severe

Page 6: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University

Fossil Fuels are the main cause

C + O2 CO2

Page 7: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University

We have choices to make

Page 8: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University

How do we reduce our carbon footprint?

Page 9: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University

Current Situation

85% of US primary energy is from fossil fuel

Page 10: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University

US Energy and CO2

Coal Consumption & Resources

Coal : 23% energy and 38% CO2

Oil: 38% energy and 41% CO2

NG: 23% energy and 21% CO2

Page 11: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University

US Energy End Use

Coal Consumption & Resources

40% energy electricity33% energy transportationRemainder heating & industry

Page 12: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University

Coal

Coal Consumption & Resources

About 50% of US electricity is generated by coal-burning power plants.

Page 13: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University

Future Coal Consumption

Because coal is cheap and plentiful, coal consumption is projected to increase rapidly.

Page 14: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University

Coal-Burning Power Plant

600 plants330 GW capacityBaseline power50% of US electricity typical plant500 MW capacity3.4 billion kWh annually3.4 MtCO2 annually SOx, NOx, Hg, particulatesMining and solid waste

Page 15: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University

Alternatives?

o Nuclearo Shale gaso Energy Efficiency and Conservationo Sequestrationo Distributed Solaro Central Solaro Windo Geothermalo Other

Page 16: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University

Nuclear Power after Fukushima

Page 17: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University

Nuclear Power

o 104 reactorso 100 GW capacityo Baseline powero 20% electricityo High capital costo Minimal CO2

Page 18: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University

Nuclear Power in the US

Page 19: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University

Nuclear Reactors:Boiling Water Reactor (BWR)

Page 20: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University

Indian Point

Unit 2 and Unit 3 were commissioned in 1974 and 1976.

Page 21: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University

Onsite Pool Storage

The spent fuel rod pool inside the Clinton Nuclear Power Plant in Clinton, Ill., is shown on Tuesday, Nov. 19, 1996. The water in the pool acts as a shield against radiation from the used uranium rods. The reactor was shut down due to an equipment malfunction Sept. 5, 1996. (AP Photo/Mark Cowan)

Page 22: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University

Dry Cask Storage

In this photo released by Holtec International, dry cask storage units are seen at the James A. Fitzpatrick nuclear power plant in Scriba, N.Y., in this undated photo. The Vermont Public Service Board approved "dry cask storage," of spent nuclear fuel at Vermont Yankee, lifting the threat that running out of room in its existing spent fuel storage pool would cause the plant to close by 2008.(AP Photo/Holtec International)

Page 23: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University

Long-Term Storage

Page 24: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University

Nuclear Accidents

Page 25: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University

Three Mile Island (1979)

Three Mile Island nuclear power plant is pictured in Jan. 21, 1996. This is the site of the 1979 partial core melt. (AP Photo/Tim Shaffer, files)

Page 26: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University

Chernobyl (1986)

Page 27: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University

Japan (2011)

Page 28: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University

Nuclear Future?

Page 29: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University

Shale Gas

Page 30: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University

Horizontal Drilling

Page 31: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University

Hydrofracturing

Page 32: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University

Efficiency and conservation

Page 33: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University

High Performance Buildings

Page 34: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University

Efficient Power Plants

Page 35: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University

Economic Incentives

Cap and Trade

Carbon Tax

Tax Credits

Rebates

Page 36: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University

Carbon Sequestration

Page 37: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University

Rooftop PV

Page 38: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University

PV: Denver Airport 4 MW

Page 39: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University

CSP: Parabolic Trough

Page 42: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University
Page 43: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University

GE 3.6 MW Wind Turbines

Page 44: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University

Wind Resources

http://attra.ncat.org/images/renewables/windResourceMap2.jpg,,Retrieved on 2/11/2009

Page 46: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University

Electricity Generation

Page 47: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University

Geothermal Energy Distribution

Page 48: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University

Selection Parameters

• Environmental Impact

• Cost

• Safety

• Footprint

• Reliability

• Acceptability

Page 49: The Future of Energy Fred Loxsom Eastern Connecticut State University

Summary: Future of Energy

• Must replace coal.

• Natural gas, but not as clean as it seems.

• Solar and Wind could supply 20%-50%, but better grid needed.

• Efficiency has great potential.

• Clean Coal & Geothermal -- ?

• Tar sands & other fossil fuel – high environmental price