the future of construction phase 2 joint kick-off for ... · 7/13/2016 · 1 working groups...

Joint Kick-Off for Working Groups

July 13, 2016

The Future of Construction Phase 2

1

Working Groups Kick-off 13July2016 vff.pptx

— Introduce new members to Steering &Advisory Committee

— Align on objectives, working mode & timeline of working groups

— Provide overview of working groups

— Align on suggested output format

— Discuss open questions

Objectives of today

!

!

!

!

!

2


Agenda

Introduce new member to Steering & Advisory Committee

Align on objectives, working mode & timeline of working groups

Provide overview of working groups

Align on suggested output formats

Discuss open questions

3


We have extended the Ste&AdvCo considerably – project owners,

government and visionary architects much stronger represented

Organization Advisor Organization CEO Project representative

Steering Committee Advisory Committee

— Kalistratos Dionelis (tbc.)

— Adrian Leaman, Bill Bordass

— Jakob Lange, K-U Bergmann

— Monica Altamirano

— Ola Jonsson

— Mahmoud H. El Burai

— David Gann

— Bill Bertera

— Savvas Verdis (tbc.)

— Gary Lee Moore

— Arjan Hijdra

— Aaron Shenhar

— Ron Bakker

— Nicholas Brooke

— David Benjamin

— Andy Davies

— David Hancock

— Terri Willis (tbc.)

— Neil McArthur (tbc.)

— Douglas Durst

— Ajit Gulabchand

— Colin Dyer

— George Hongchoy

— Coen van Oostrom

— Jean-Louis Chaussade

— Antoine Frérot (tbc.)

— Tom DeRosa

— Frank P. Lowy

— tbd.

— Douglas Durst

— tbd.

— Franz Jenowein

— Max Wong

— tbd.

— Diane Galbe

— tbd.

— Shank Mitra

— tbd.

2. LP

6. FL

6. FL

3. SU

5. DR

3. SU

4. AF

1. PD

5. DR

1. PD

3. SU

1. PD

3. SU

1. PD

2. LP

6. FL

3. SU

Project Delivery Affordability 1. PD 4. AF

Lifecycle Performance Disaster Resilience 2. LP 5. DR

Sustainability Flexibility/Liveability 3. SU 6. FL

Working Groups (indicative)

1

1. Observer to SteCo

1. PD

http://www.biogas-etc.eu/files/2014/02/imperial_logo.jpg

http://sustainableinfrastructure.org/

http://www.worldgbc.org/

http://eng.lacity.org/index.cfm

http://www.google.ch/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&source=imgres&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwilnLSS6e7NAhXB5xoKHSRHARIQjRwIBw&url=https://plus.google.com/u/0/102099175184392294473&psig=AFQjCNF-FC6mKDjfSGX1VdZglHLFRjBiGw&ust=1468443683170272

4


Existing Steering & Advisory Committee members continue in Phase 2

Organization Advisor Organization CEO Project representative

Steering Committee Advisory Committee

— Francisco Reynés Massanet

— José M Entrecanales

— John Beck

— Ton Buechner

— Jonathan Lewis1

— Lakshimi Mittal

— Gregory Hodkinson

— Kurt Bock

— Samer S. Khoury

— Niels Christiansen

— Prashant Ruia

— David D. Seaton

— Kinya Seto2

— Henry Ross Perot Jr.

— Bill McDermott

— Joe Kaeser

— Johan Karlström

— Neil Alexander Bruce

— Michel Giannuzzi

— Uwe Krüger

— Enric Perez Diaz

— Pierre Buffet

— S. Nackan/M. Kattapuram

— Annemieke Kievit

— Charles Mouzannar

— Patrick Le Pense

— tbd.

— Roland Streng

— Jamal Akl/Antoine Haddad

— Nis Jessen

— Shiba Panda

— Mark Brown

— Hanseul Kim

— Todd Platt

— Michael Shomberg

— Andreas Romandi

— Roger Bayliss

— Anette Timmer/Remco Teulings

— Jeffrey S Herriman

Backup

— Ibrahim Odeh

— Enrico Vink

— Jan van Schoonhoven

— Spiro Pollalis

— Edmundo Werna

— Shervin Hashgeno

— Aaron B. Schwarz

— Franziska Hasselmann

— Bob Prieto

— Tiago Guerra

— Aris Pantelias

— James C. Dalton

1. To be effective as of June 1. Interim CEO Ian McHoul will remain as CFO. 2. Designated CEO to replace Yoshiaki Fujimori

http://www.skanska.com/

http://www.lixil.com/

5


Agenda






6


Terms of reference for working groups

Working Groups (WGs) bring together different

stakeholders from industry, academia,

government and civil society

Objective: Develop solutions to key challenges of

the infrastructure and urban development industry

WGs can be considered as "Mini Think Tanks"

charting a roadmap into the future

WGs work independently under coordination by one

academic and one business lead

WG members decide amongst themselves which

specific angle of the subject they would like to

tackle

WGs agree on the frequency and type of

interactions – suggestion: monthly 90-minute call

Members are encouraged to suggest other key

stakeholders required for a systematic solution –

participation is by invitation only

WEF team will provide

• A frame of the broad topic to be covered

• Expectations on minimum deliverables

• Technical & logistics support

• Cloud-based platform for data exchange

• Phone/video conference bridge (incl.

transcripts & recordings of calls)

Purpose Working mode

The success of the working groups depends on your active participation and input!

7


Toplink as central collaboration platform for all WGs to facilitate

exchange of ideas, public website for dissemination of ideas

• WEF's exclusive online platform for

constituents

• Future of Construction project page

— Overview of members

— Share documents

— Initiate discussions

Public project website to disseminate

existing and new content

• Solutions developed by WGs

• Lighthouse innovation cases

• Ideas developed in competition of students

& young professionals

Integration with social media to

continuously engage community

Multiple forms of content (blogs, mini-essays,

cases, short videos)

Long-term objective is to transform website

into permanent platform for best-practice

sharing and multi-stakeholder dialogue

Hosted and maintained by reputable

academic institution

Toplink as central collaboration

platform for working groups

Public website to disseminate

content and engage community

Currently in discussion

and preparation

8


We suggest a five-step process for working groups

1 Formation &

joint kick-off

of WG

Kick-off in

different

WGs

Deep-dives

in WGs

Exchange of

preliminary

results

Synthesizing

results 2 3 4 5 • Steering & Advisory

Committee

members form

Working Groups

based on interest in

specific challenge

• Addt'l stakeholders

(e.g., disruptors,

gvmt., leading

academics) are

included based on

input (1-on-1 calls)

• Joint kick-off call to

present WGs and

to align on process

and output

• Individual kick-off

calls in WGs bring

together all

stakeholders

• WG members

propose ideas

which specific

aspect to tackle

• Selection of 1-3

aspects per WG to

focus on

• One representative

from business and

from academia take

the lead in

coordinating WGs

• WG deep-dives into

selected aspects

and develops

solutions

• Solutions are

described in

specified output

format - led by WG

heads

• Joint meeting to

exchange

preliminary results

among WGs

• Identify common

themes and gather

new ideas

• Finalized solutions

are published on

micro-site

• Common results of

what needs to

change are

synthesized across

WGs and included

in report

Joint Kick-off Call

July 13

Kick-off calls

for each WG

July 26/27

AM Davos

Jan.

Workshop NYC

Sept. 22

(hosted by The Durst

Organization, tbd.)

Policy as enabler to

address key challenges

Additional events

planned for

early 2017

• UCL (tbd.)

• Lifecycle Perfor-

mance in NL

(tbd.)

WG calls

Oct

WG calls

Sept.

WG calls

Nov

WG calls

Dec

Workshop Hong Kong

Early Nov

(in cooperation

with ULI)

Technology as enabler to

address key challenges

9


Milestones for working groups defined

Workshop NYC

• Representative of each working group to give overview of specific aspects they plan

to cover in working group

• Share first ideas for innovative solutions to address these aspects

22.

Sep

2016

Workshop

Hong Kong

• WGs present first draft of their mini-essays (to be finalized in following weeks)

• Exchange of ideas with other WGs and discussion of proposed solutions

7/8.

Nov

2016

Preparation of

AM 2017 Davos • WGs submit their finalized mini-essays for publication on project website

16.

Dec

2016

Workshop

Location tbd.

• WGs present their final results

• Discussion of next steps to move ideas forward

Feb/

Mar

2017

10


Agenda






11


Six working groups about the industry's key challenges – integrated

with the other elements of the project

Sustainability Project

Delivery

Lifecycle

Performance

Affordability Disaster

Resilience

Flexibility/

liveability/

well-being

State-of-the-art implementation of successful innovations in projects or organizations at the current frontier

Ideas competition for students & young professionals develops fresh solutions

1 2 3 4 5 6

Working Group mini-essays about new solutions and how to change paradigms (incl. lessons from of other industries)

Startups & pilots (techn. & business model innovations) preparing for the next wave beyond the current frontier

Some themes are underlying all of the above topics – e.g., technologies & digitalisation,

labour and policy environment as enablers

Deep-dives on following pages

12


• Development of cooperative and collaborative models (connecting

all stakeholders) to better answer the needs of the customers (incl.

adoption of new technologies e.g. BIM)

• Effective communication and alignment of interest between owner

and contractors at the beginning to enable better planning

• Adoption of technologies & lessons from complex industrial

megaprojects and manuf. industries (e.g. aerospace, ship-building)

• "The main challenge is to create certainty rather than just improving

costs and time of delivery"

• "Project delivery challenge comes down to improving productivity"

• "Project delivery is about the global value proposition of the

construction industry, going beyond time & budget"

Deep-Dive: Project Delivery

Context & Background Working Group - Members

Exemplary topics for deep-dive

• >90% of mega-projects are above budget or behind

schedule

• Industry fragmentation and little cross-functional & value

chain cooperation

• Limited learning from project to project & over time

• Project management approach has not evolved over

time: does not take into account increased complexity &

disruptions from outside (e.g., political, investor risk)

Interested partners & advisors Potential Members

Source: World Economic Forum; BCG analysis

Ibrahim Odeh

tbd.

Nicholas

Brooke

Andy Davies

Enrico Fink

David Gann

Tiago Guerra

David Hancock

Bob Prieto

Aaron Shenhar

USACE

Don Ward,

Constructing

Excellence

Bent Flyvberg, Said

Business School

1

Working Group Lead

Business Co-Lead Your nomination expected


13


Deep-Dive: Lifecycle Performance



• Operations account for a significant share of asset's

lifecycle costs

• Current procurement models with over-preference for

lowest bid often prevent frontloading of costs

• Large parts of critical infrastructure (water locks, bridges,

ports, etc) in Western countries date back to the

beginning of 20th century – large need for rehabilitation



Franziska Hasselmann/

Aris Pantelias

tbd.

• Improving efficiency and putting more value into the existing

infrastructure and assets – e.g., through big data & analytics

• Incorporate lifecycle perspective, taking into account also end

of life of assets, demolition & recycling (circular economy)

• Develop effective planning and design instruments that take

into account potential changes of use and evolving client

requirements in the future (e.g., simulations/what-if-analyses)

• Develop new contracting models that take into account total

cost of ownership perspective (e.g., performance-based

contracts)

David Hancock

Jan v.

Schoonhoven

USACE

Kallistratos Dionellis,

ASECAP

Federal Highway

Administration

Stéphane Ouaki, EU

Commission, DG

Move

2

Working Group Lead




14


Deep-Dive: Sustainability



• E&C industry is largest consumer of raw materials

• 30% of Greenhouse Gas emissions are attributable to

buildings

• 50% of the solid waste in the United States is produced

by the construction industry

• Construction sector committed itself to contribute to

achieving sustainability targets in COP21, SDG and

Habitat III



Spiro Pollalis

tbd.

• Reduce the real total costs of ownership for society (including

environmental impact)

• Achieve carbon neutral and positive buildings over the entire

lifecycle of assets (incl. carbon neutral companies)

• Develop public asset procurement standards to consider

sustainability as a critical factor starting from the design &

contracting phase (e.g., design, processes, materials used)

• Align on rating system for infrastr.& buildings – incl. E&C firms

• "The main sustainability challenge is to reduce waste in the

construction process and CO2 emissions during ops"

• "Any asset can be considered a collection of commodities that can

be reused at the end of its life"

Bill Bertera

Ron Bakker

David Benjamin

Ola Jonsson

Ibrahim Odeh

Terri Willis

3

Working Group Lead




15


Deep-Dive: Affordability



• Population projected to rise to over 9bn in 2050

• 200k people are added daily to urban areas and need

affordable housing

• $1 trillion annual investments are needed to close the

global infrastructure gap

Working Group Lead

Business Co-Lead



Mahmoud El Burai

tbd.

• Improve affordability and quality of built environment

• Develop solutions to upgrade existing low-quality

housing – especially in urban areas

• Scale up value engineering and pre-fabrication –

especially in emerging economies

• Create livable and inclusive cities - both in industrialized

emerging countries

• Design effective financing models for affordable housing

• "Affordability and quality cannot be separated"

Andy Davies

Enrico Fink

Tiago Guerra

Bob Prieto

Aaron Shenhar

4

Your nomination expected

16


Deep-Dive: Disaster Resilience



• Three times as many disasters were reported in last

year as in 1980

• ~ 94% of loss-related natural catastrophes in 2015 were

weather-related events1

• Large parts of critical infrastructure (water locks, bridges,

ports, etc) in Western countries date back to the

beginning of 20th century – large need for rehabilitation


1. MunichRE Source: World Economic Forum; BCG analysis

Monica Altamirano/

Arjan Hijdra

tbd.

• Take into account resilience against natural disasters in

the planning, design and engineering process of assets

• Foster knowledge and technology transfer to disaster-

prone and high-risk developing countries

• Develop effective programs to rehabilitate and upgrade

existing disaster defense systems (e.g., locks)

• Improve the response to natural disasters – in terms of

restoring infrastructure and housing

USACE

Government of

Norway

Harvey Hill

5

Working Group Lead


17


Deep-Dive: Flexibility/Liveability/Well-being



• >20% of the global population will be 60+ years in 2050

(>30% in most OECD countries)

• Changing user patterns of existing assets &

infrastructure (sharing economy)

• Volatile organic compounds found inside US homes are

2-5x times higher than outside levels



Ron Bakker

tbd.

• Incorporate user journey in building design and

construction to better understand inhabitants/pain points

• Improve well-being of end-users – for infrastructure

assets as well as in the inside and outside of buildings

• Design for re-purposing or next use (link to circular

economy)

• Creating liveable spaces instead of building assets

• "Ultimately, purpose of buildings is to make people more

efficient and improve their well-being"

Kai-Uwe

Bergmann

Bill Bordass

Jakob Lange

Adrian Leaman

Richard de Neufville,

MIT

Savvas Verdis, LSE

6

Working Group Lead



18


Agenda






19


Description Output structure

Roadblocks to implement

the innovative solution

Innovative solution to

address a challenge

Construction eco-system

transformation required to

overcome roadblocks

• How does the innovative solution look like (technology, process)?

• How does the innovative solution address the challenge and what is the impact?

• How close is innovation to market readiness, which elements are already available?

• What similar innovations from other industries have already been adopted?

• What are key internal barriers within orgs for implementing proposed solution?

• What are key external barriers for enabling the proposed solution (e.g. regulation)?

• How mission-critical are the roadblocks for the suggested solutions (slowing down

vs. killing solution)?

• What are concrete next steps to make it a reality (i.e. overcome roadblocks)?

• What additional steps are required to bring it to scale?

• Which key stakeholders have to be involved and what do the need to do?

• Which new ways of working are essential to overcome roadblocks?

• Which additional resources are needed to overcome the roadblocks?

Proposed output format for working groups (~ ideas competition) Format should help to frame your ideas and give you some orientation

Addressed (Sub-)Challenge: Which challenge and specific aspect is addressed through the solution

Solution: Catchy title

3 pages max.

Additional ideas could be published in form of blog posts on project website

20


Agenda






21


Invite additional members to the working groups based on your input

Prepare individual working group kick-offs: each WG member to reflect on specific

aspects to be covered in WG)

Finalize workshop planning and send out save-the-dates for September and November

Next steps

22


Do you have any questions or comments?

the future of construction phase 2 joint kick-off for ... · 7/13/2016 · 1 working groups...

Documents