the first crusade: inciting agents and retrospective
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/30/2019 The First Crusade: Inciting Agents and Retrospective
1/22
1
LIBERTY UNIVERSITY
THE FIRST CRUSADE: INCITING AGENTS AND RETROSPECTIVE
PRESENTED TO
DR. RODNEY M. NICKENS
CHHI 302 D02 201240HISTORY OF THE CHRISTIAN CHURCH
BY
Michael Wright
L23893877
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON
DECEMBER 2012
-
7/30/2019 The First Crusade: Inciting Agents and Retrospective
2/22
ii
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION 1
SITUATION IN THE EAST 3
SITUATION IN THE WEST 5
THE INVESTITURE CONTROVERSY 7
THE COUNCIL OF CLERMONT AND BEYOND 10
JUST WAR AND THE CHRISTIAN WORLDVIEW 11
CONCLUSION 16
BIBLIOGRAPHY 19
-
7/30/2019 The First Crusade: Inciting Agents and Retrospective
3/22
1
INTRODUCTION
In 1095 A.D., Western Christians of every station mobilized into armies and marched
towards the Jerusalem looking to liberate the holy places from the tribes of Islam under the
proclamation ofDeus vult; God wills it. The first four-year campaign resulted in temporary
victory in the Holy Land, establishing Crusader States and the Kingdom of Jerusalem, as well as
increased authority and power to the Western Papacy of the Roman Catholic Church. However
this victory came at a high cost; both sides suffered heavy casualties, Jews and Muslims alike
were massacred, and crusaders committed other violations, trespass, and destruction of private
property. A disorganized mob inspired seven more Crusades. The legacy of the Crusades only
widened the schism between the Roman and Greek churches, and left centuries of believers and
non-believers asking how a Christian nation could allow this to happen. How could Jesus Christ
and His teachings inspire such radical violence? In examining the inciting factors that led to this
First Crusade and holding them to the Christian Worldview, it will be established that nothing
about this campaign could have been inspired by God.
The Crusades were by no means the worlds introduction to the concept of a holy war. In
centuries past, any action taken by a nation in the name of their patron deity could in that sense
be considered a religiously motivated action. Whether it was the Jewish conquest of Canaan, the
Jewish-Roman wars that ended the Second Temple Period or the Muslim conquests that
preceded this Crusade, these wars were considered holy merely by precept of the communal
action of the sacred peoples engaging in them. Despite many known factors involved in the years
leading to the Crusade, Historiographers have had difficulty identifying the one defining its
causes and justifications. The German historian Carl Erdmann in 1935 theorized that a
progressive transformation of Christian ethics, the closing gap between the powers of Church
-
7/30/2019 The First Crusade: Inciting Agents and Retrospective
4/22
2
and State, the moral decay of the papacy and priestly seats collided with 11 th century reform
movements as both the military and ruling class were fully rooted in Western Christianity.1
As the West moved towards a consolidated Christendom, the Byzantine Empire to the
East was in a state of downfall. Soon after the long schism between the Eastern and Western
churches ended with mutual excommunication, the Empire began to fall into decline. 2 With the
rapid spread of Islam and the threat of the Seljuq Turks advancing across the Byzantine frontier,
Emperor Alexios I Komnenos appealed to Pope Urban II for assistance. Despite the divide in the
church, this may have been seen as an opportunity for reconciliation, but Urban saw it as an
opportunity to quiet the war-like unrest in the West.
3
He began a campaign of preaching that the
Holy Land must be reclaimed, the infidel defeated, and that through this enterprise their sins
would be forgiven. The response was so great that Peter the Hermit prematurely led his own
crusade into the Holy Land before the nobles could assemble.
In examining the issues that led to the First Crusade, it is only natural to categorize these
events by their Eastern and Western perspectives. Additionally since political and church reform
played heavily into the Western side, it is helpful to appraise some of those prominent
motivations, such as the Investiture Controversy. Through retrospective analysis, it will be
necessary to review the tenants of a Christian Worldview, and in holding these motivations to
that standard, examine their consistency.
1 Carl Erdmann, The Origin of the Idea of Crusade (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1977), 3-
15, 57.
2 Gordon M. Patterson,Medieval History: 500 to 1450 Ce, 112 vols. (Piscataway, NJ: Research &
Education Assn, 1995), 15.
3 Clifford R. Backman, The Worlds of Medieval Europe (New York: Oxford University Press, 2003), 221-
222.
-
7/30/2019 The First Crusade: Inciting Agents and Retrospective
5/22
3
SITUATION IN THE EAST
For hundreds of years the divide between Eastern and Western Christianity grew wider.
Ecclesiastical and theological disputes frequently erupted on everything from whether or not to
serve leavened or unleavened bread at Eucharist, to the Western Papal claim to universal
authority over the church. While the Eastern Orthodox Church (as it came to be called) had its
roots in Greek philosophy, most of Roman Catholic theology was formed from Roman law. This
conflict came to a head in 1054 AD with the mutual excommunication of Pope Leo IX of Rome
and Patriarch Michael Cerularius of Constantinople. Despite numerous attempts to reconcile,
these churches have not come to terms since.
4
After this the Byzantine Empire fell into discord, as civil war followed with foreign
invasions for twenty-four years. A weak emperor was replaced by ambitious generals who for
various reasons were incapable of holding the throne. The State fell into disrepair and a
considerable portion of its army was disbanded. Safety of the realm was guarded by a select
national guard, who stood no chance at defending the Empire against the incursion of the Seljouk
Turks.5
The Seljouk Turks were a branch of Persian Muslims who, reinforced by kindred clans,
with fanatical agression conquered much of the East, from India through the Persian Gulf to
Byzantine Anatolia. This was a fierce enemy reinforced by a heavily armed and well-trained
military structure, with legions of bodyguards, assasins, light horseman, and expert bowman.
They conquered new territory by flooding into encampments and breaking organized resistance
into disorganized fighting fragments by targeting military commanders. The Turks preferred
4 Timothy Ware, The Orthodox Church, 2nd ed. (Penguin Adult, 1993), 43-50.
5 Charles William Chadwick Oman, The Byzantine Empire, 3rd. Kindle ed. (London: Amazon Digital
Services, Inc. (G. P. Putnam's Sons), 1902; reprint, Amazon Kindle), 249-253.
-
7/30/2019 The First Crusade: Inciting Agents and Retrospective
6/22
4
making slaves of their enemies, but did not hesitate to slaughter and loot the treasuries in their
invasion. When refugees were discovered they were routed to their next target, driving fear into
the hearts of their next ambition.6
The greatest disaster came in 1071 as Emperor Romanus was drawn by Seljouk
plunderers to Manzikert where he found himself confronted by the full host of the Seljouk
Empire, led by Sultan Alp Arslan himself. With an army of exausted soldiers and two missing
divisions, and despite being completely out-flanked by the Turks Romanus ordered the attack on
Manzikert. Even with the odds against them, poor military strategy led to a decisive defeat of the
Byzantines and Romanus himself taken captive. While Arslan showed Romanus a great deal
more mercy than expected, Romanus was replaced by coup, then ransomed back only to be
murdered to prevent his return to the throne. This marked the ultimate turning point in Byzantine
history.7
As the Seljouks continued their conquest nearly unopposed, another threat to the South
emerged. At nearly the same time as the Battle of Manzikert, the Fatamids, an Islamic state
claiming descendance from Muhammads daughter Fatima invaded Palestine and took
Jerusalem. In doing so all pilgramage routes from Europe to the Holy Land dried up as any
traveler was now at the mercy of marauders and merciless privateers.8
As Emperor Alexios I took power, the Seljouks conquered the entire Anatolian Plateau
with the securing of Nicaea in 1081. While they established their new capitol there, Alexios
grudgingly reached out to Pope Gregory VII of the Holy Roman Empire for support. Indeed
Gregory was anxious to see the Holy Sepulcher back in Christian hands; unfortunately he was far
6 Previt-Orton Charles William, The Shorter Cambridge Medieval History: In Two Volumes, 2 vols., vol. 1
(London, England: Cambridge University Press, 1955), 278-81.
7 Oman, 251-56.
8 Mike Paine, The Crusades (Harpenden: Pocket Essentials, 2005), 28.
-
7/30/2019 The First Crusade: Inciting Agents and Retrospective
7/22
5
too embroiled in the Investiture Controversy to effectively marshal support.9 It was not until the
Council of Clermont in 1095 that Alexius sent envoys to Pope Urban II to officially request
military assistance against the forces of the Seljouk Turks.10
SITUATION IN THE WEST
When one considers the nature of Christianity in the West at the time of the Crusades, it
is helpful to note that a thousand years earlier France and other barbarian territories were in a
constant state of warfare and absorbption with Rome. The Romans brought a measure of peace
and stability to the region but not for long, as less than a hundred years later the Empires
supremacy began to waver. But the Western Empire did not implode overnight; it progressively
eroded and was replaced by the barbarian nations. While eventually united again by the Frankish
Carolingian Empire of Charlamagne, peace was soon inturrpted by Viking incursion. By the time
of the Crusades the Caroligian dynasty was long evaporated, but hundreds of years of squabbles
between the nobles conserved the image of a Christian warrior class. 11
Since the early Seventh Century the Reconquista, or reconquest of the Iberian peninsula
against the Moores had been a long, ongoing struggle. The first victories were won by Pelagius
of Asturias, a Visigoth nobleman who founded the Kingdom of Asturias. Eventually aid came
from the Franks with Charles Martel at the lead, followed by Pepin the Short and his son
Charlemagne, who brought the area into the Carolingian Empire and the influence of the
church.12 Though the fighting continued, this conflict was never considered a religious endeavor,
9 Jonathan Howard, The Crusades: A History of One of the Most Epic Military Campaigns of All Time,
Kindle ed. (North Charleston, SC: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 2012), 11.
10 Paine, 31-33.
11 Thomas S. Asbridge, The First Crusade : A New History (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004), 3-
4.
12 Viscount James Bryce, The Holy Roman Empire, Kindle ed. (Chicago, IL: Acheron Press, 1906; reprint,
2012), Location 833-856.
-
7/30/2019 The First Crusade: Inciting Agents and Retrospective
8/22
6
but a battle to regain the lands of Spain. That is until Pope Urban II altered the tone of the
conflict.
After Charlemagne and before Urban, the remnant lordship fell into a series of petty
fuedal struggles against each other. In an effort to pacify the nobles, the clergy established the
Pax dei (the Peace of God); they developed sanctified peace assemblies, collecting as many
religious relics as possible, bits of bone, vials of blood, pieces of clothe from the clothing of
saints, generally anything that was said to have been touched by a venerated saint. They would
collect them in a field and invite any knights and nobles in the area, gaining their cooperation in
maintaining peace in the West. The idea was the use the fear of the saints, the desire of the
aristocracy to seek out shrines to obtain cures and obtain advice about the future. While not
initially sucessful it would set the stage for later cooperation amongs the meieval community. 13
Then in France around 1033 after a terrible famine resulted in murderous spree, the
bishops and abbots released a united resolution that forbade violence on specific days of the year
on threat of excommunication. This spread to Italy and Gaul, forming the Treuga Dei (the
Truce of God). The Truega Dei was sanctioned and confirmed by nine Synods before it was
signed into general law of the church by Pope Urban II.
13 Richard Landes, "Peace of God, Pax Dei,"Berkshire Encyclopedia of Millenian Movements Vol. (1999).
http://www.mille.org/people/rlpages/paxdei.html (accessed 12/7/2012).
-
7/30/2019 The First Crusade: Inciting Agents and Retrospective
9/22
7
THE INVESTITURE CONTROVERSY
Emperor Alexios petition for help came as a welcome distraction for Pope Urban, the
opportunity to temporarily put to rest a controversy that endangered the primacy of the church.
From the time of Charlemagne large amounts of land were donated to and put under the care of
the church. Since the church was not in the business of governing land, it fell upon the
ecclesiastical order to appoint lords and vassals, even kings with the obligation of protecting the
lands and vassals under their care. As close to half the land came under the ownership of the
land, the secular lords saw it as their right to appoint and invest in the clergy. The appointed
bishops became vassals of the lords, swearing oathes of fealty to them with the implied duties of
serving the court and drafting soldiers for the defense of the land. And when that bishop died the
lords often held up the appointment of their successor to take advantage of the coffers of the
church. This came to be known as simony, and greatly offended the people of the church,
particularly Pope Gregory VII.14
The turning point came in 1075 when the Germanic Emperor Henry IV appointed his
chaplain Tedald, a German archbishop to the bishopric seat of Milan, giving German control and
income from a diocese he likely never visited. Tedald was a member of the layity with no real
experience or influence in the church, and his appointment was seen as an outright power grab
by the Empire to control the church. In response Gregory issued the Dictatus papae, a collection
14 Philip Schaff, "The War over Investiture.," in History of the Christian Church Vol. V, Medival
Christianity : From Gregory I to Gregory Vii, A.D. 590-1073, ed. Tim Perrine (Grand Rapids, Mich: Eerdmans
Publ. Co, 1997), 44.
-
7/30/2019 The First Crusade: Inciting Agents and Retrospective
10/22
8
of 27 affirmations of Papal license giving him the authority to excommunicate Henry IV from
the church, effectively deposing him as Emperor.15
In an ironic twist Henry accused Gregory of being not the pope but a false monk, and
appealing to the bishops in an attempt to depose Gregory. Gregory had already secured the
support of the German aristocracy, princes and nobels eager to secure their liberty from the
oppressive Emperor. To Henrys dismay the bishops declined to support him and marshaled
support for Gregory. As a result Henry was forced to prostrate himself before Gregory, barefoot
and penitent outside the gates of Canossa. Gregory lifted the excommunication but not restore
his position, allowing the German Aristocrats to install Rudolf von Rheinfeld as his successor.
While the fueds between the popes and Roman Emperors continued will into the Twelth century,
the repercussions of this event conferred upon the Papacy total sovereignty over the Western
kingdoms.16
Gregorys actions at Canossa, while significant to the papacy, proved to be detrimental to
his own legacy. The German lords who had supported Gregory felt betrayed by his decision to
lift the excommunication of Henry. The appointment of Rheinfeld was made without Gregorys
council, and Gregory was forced to support his rule and excommunicate Henry again three years
later after Germany fell into civil war. Unfortunately by then it was too late, as Henry had slain
Rheinfeld on the battlefield. Gregory was blamed for the resulting discord, and Henry used the
momentum to elect Clement III, a formerly excommunicated archbiship, in his place. Gregory
appealed to the Normans for help, who repelled Henrys forces but cuased one of the worst
15 Ralph Keen, The Christian Tradition (Upper Saddle River (N.J.): Prentice Hall, 2004), 159-161.
16 R. Scott Appleby, "How the Pope Got His Political Muscle," U.S. Catholic 64, no. 9 (1999).
-
7/30/2019 The First Crusade: Inciting Agents and Retrospective
11/22
9
sackings of Romes history. While the Normans withdrew, Gregory was forced into exile, where
he died as one of the most despised popes in history.17
Gregorys successor Clement III emerged with strong support of the people and the
majority of the cardinals. Against expectations however Clement acted independantly,
continuing to fight for the measures Gregory did, legislating the end of simony and clerical
marriage. As a pope he turned out to be far more assertive than the Aristocracy preferred, and in
1086 with the help of Countess Matilda of Tuscany was replaced by Victor III. Unfortunately for
the cardinals, Victor died four months after his consecration.
Pope Urban II was elected in 1088, just as committed to Gregorys reforms but far less
confrontational. The atmosphere of the West at this point was precarious, with Countess Matilda
and the Normans as allies, a suspicious German people, and a relentless war continuing in Spain,
Urban adopted the attitude of a realist. Henry IV still opposed the church, but Urban used the
discontent of his army and Henrys damaged marriage to his advantage.18
At the Synod of Piacenza in 1095, Urban was able to re-assert authority of the church and
victory over Henry and the Investiture Controversy bny using Henrys ex-wife and son public
testimony to Henrys participation in the Black Mass to evaporate any remaining support.
Having previously excommunicated Phillip I of France for illegally divorcing his wife, Urban
used Phillips appeal to solidify Clement IIIs removal from office. Also in attendance were
Emperor Alexius ambassadors, pleading for military assisstance. In the hopes of quelling all
Western hostilities and longing to undo the earlier East-West Schism that broke apart the church,
17 John W. O'Malley,History of the Popes : From Peter to the Present, Adobe Digital ed. (Sheed & Ward,
2010), 101-109.
18 Ibid. 110-112.
-
7/30/2019 The First Crusade: Inciting Agents and Retrospective
12/22
10
Urban lifted Alexius Western excommunication and began asking for Christians to assist their
Eastern neighbors.19
THE COUNCIL OF CLERMONT AND BEYOND
Of all the precipitating factors to the First Crusade, the Counsel of Clermont is
considered to be the catalyst for the Crusader avidity. Soon after Piacenza Urban traveled to his
home country of France to deliver an impassioned speech to 300 clerics from around France,
charging Christians to take up the divine enterprise of retaking the Holy Land. He reported the
conditions of attacks on Christian pilgramages that outraged Christendom, probably reported
from Peter the Hermit, who was in attendance. Urban called for the princes and barons to give up
the petty infighting and unrighteous wars in the West, motivated by material rewards, for a holy
war against the Arab infedels who plundered and desecrated Jerusalem. Further, Urban offered
indulgances, promises that all who died in the Crusade would have their sins forgiven and
granted immediate access into Heaven. When Urban finished the crowd began shouting Deus
Vult(God wills it).20
The message at Clermont was carried by the clergy throughout Europe. People of every
class were so excited by the prospect of the endeavor that while the Nobles had agreed to depart
on August 15th, the Feast of Assumption, several armies of peasants, including those organized
by Peter the Hermit departed months earlier in the Peoples Crusade. Another band attacked
19 Richard Butler, "Pope Bl. Urban Ii," The Catholic Encyclopedia Vol. 15(1912).
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14257a.htm (accessed 8 Dec. 2012).
20 Schaff, "The Call to the Crusades.," 185-89; Munro Dana Carleton, "The Speech of Pope Urban Ii. At
Clermont, 1095," The American Historical Review 11, no. 2 (1906).
-
7/30/2019 The First Crusade: Inciting Agents and Retrospective
13/22
11
Jewish settlements across France and Germany, looting and killing in what some called the First
Holocaust.21
JUST WAR AND THE CHRISTIAN WORLDVIEW
In analysis of the factors leading up to the First Crusade to see if they represent the
Christain wordview, we must consider that the ethics of War have been philosophically
scrutinized for centuries. Because the Crusades happened in a different era, it is necessary to first
define the ethics by which the Crusaders justified their actions. This doctrine is known as Just
War, at from the time of Charlamagne through the Crusading Papacy the primary influence of
this philosophy came from Augustine. However unlike his contemporary Thomas Aquinas,
Augustine did not approach the topic systematically. The principles of his approach were
scattered through his many assorted works.22
There are essentially two criteria behind Just War Theory,jus ad bellum (the right to go
to war) andjus in bello (the right to conduct war). Underjus ad bellum there are eight subsets of
principles, just cause, comparative justice, competent authority, right intention, competent
authority, probability of success, last resort, and proportionality. Underjus in bello there are
three subsets, distinction, proportionality, and good faith.
The Following table explains Augustines positions in all these principals.
Jus ad bellum: The Right to go to War
Just Cause To defend the state from
external invasion.
To defend the safety or honor ofthe state, with the realization that
their simultaneous defense might
be impossible.
21 Schaff, "The First Crusade and the Capture of Jerusalem.," 189-192.
22 John Mark Mattox, Saint Augustine and the Theory of Just War, Continuum Studies in Philosophy
(Continuum, 2006), 2-4.
-
7/30/2019 The First Crusade: Inciting Agents and Retrospective
14/22
12
To avenge injuries; to punish anation for failure to take
corrective action for wrongs
(legal or moral) committed by its
citizens.
To come to the defense of onesallies.
To obey a divine command to
go to war (which, in practice,issues from the political head of
state acting as Gods lieutenant
on earth).
To gain the return of something
that was wrongfully taken.
Comparative Justice The nation which claims to have
just cause to wage war must havea cause which is at least more
just than the other nations
cause.
Right Intention War must not be fought for
territorial expansion.
Those who wage war must notdelight in the wickedness of
potential adversaries.
Those who wage war must view
war as a stern necessity.
Those empowered to wage war
must never act in a way thatwould provoke war.
Competent Authority The sovereign ruler of the statehas authority to wage war.
Those subject to the authority of
the sovereign are duty-bound to
fight in the sovereigns wars(perhaps even in those which are
unjust).
God can, with perfect justice,direct wars to be fought.
Probability Of Success A war justly entered into still
can be held to have been just
even if it is lost.
Last Resort Disputes should be resolved by
means short of war whenever
-
7/30/2019 The First Crusade: Inciting Agents and Retrospective
15/22
13
possible.
Proportionality War must be fought in light of
the object of the restoration ofpeace; and the restoration of
peace will mark the attainment ofa greater good than would haveresulted from the continued
absence of peace.
Peace as the UltimateObjective of War
Peace is the proper object of all
wars.
Jus in bello: The Right to Conduct War
Discrimination Only one acting in the official
capacity of a soldier is justifiedin performing the acts of violence
associated with the profession ofarms.
The clergy should not take up
arms.
Mercy and forbearance should
be shown to captives and non-combatants.
Proportionality All actions taken in war should
be limited by military necessity.
Good Faith Keep promises made to the
enemy.The use of ruses and stratagemsis morally acceptable in anotherwise just war.
Table 1-1: Augustines Values of Just War23
23 Ibid. 74-84.
-
7/30/2019 The First Crusade: Inciting Agents and Retrospective
16/22
14
Before holding the Cruades up to a Christian worldview, it may be worth asking the
question; did the lead up to the First Crusade measure up to the definition of Just War as
regarded in the day. If those who promoted this enterprise failed to consider their own principles,
than it is reasonable to consider that the First Crusade, and possible every action after, cannot be
considered a Just War.
First, lets look atjus in bello; did the Crusaders have the right to conduct a Just War?
Did they have Just Cause? During this time there was already a long struggle to retake land lost
to the Moores in Spain However the Moors were largely Northern Africans converted to
Islam, while the Selkouk Turks were in part converted Persians, but primarily Sunni Muslims
with a long history of conquest. They were not precisely the same enemy but perhaps held the
same agenda. The Byzentine Empire were not allies of the West until Pope Urban lifted the
excommunication of Alexios, justifying the empire as an ally worth defending. The divine
commandment principal is ony valid if the Pope was legitimately the political head of state
acting as Gods lieutentant on earth; a case can be made that the defeat of Henry IV perceptually
achieved this. Ultimately the most valid justification would be to gain the return of something
that was wrongfully taken, as events in the East led to the closure of pilgramage routes, as well
as the seizire and desecration of Jerusalem. (Whether Jerusalem belonged to Christian hands is
another argument)
Was there Comparative Justice? In this case the West must have a cause which is more
just than the other nations (the Seljouk Turks) cause. While the motivation of the Turks is
complex, it essentially began with early Arab rebellions and victory over the Persian Empire.
Another possible motiviation was the parting words of Caliph Abu Bakr, that to turn ones back
on an enemy was to earn the wrath of Allah. He also specifically issued the decree to refrain
-
7/30/2019 The First Crusade: Inciting Agents and Retrospective
17/22
15
from attacking monks and monastaries, but to kill all other Christians until they submit to Islam.
It is difficult to conclude whether the Western case was more just, considering Charlemagne
engaged in similar behavior; however the Carolingian wars were short compared to the hundreds
of years of constant Muslim conquest.
Did the Western Crusaders posess the Right Intention? While the First Crusade resulted
in the formation of Crusader States and the Kingdom of Jerusalem, the acquisition of territory
was never a motivating factor in the conquest. It is debateable whether or not the Crusaders
delighted in the wickedness of potential adversaries, as commentary of the day regards the
killing as a holymercy. There are two considerations that the Crusaders may have regarded the
war as a stern necessity. First, Pope Urbans passionate argument that it was the divine will of
God to retake the Holy Land is a legitimate motivation. Second, Urbans offerof Indulgances,
forgiveness of sin and immediate access into Heaven would have resonance in the chaotic fuedal
world. As to the last, acting in a way that would provoke war would not seem to apply, as it
seemed the divine duty of the Turks to murder Christians.
The principle of Competant Authority might be a convoluted subject considering Pope
Urban incited the Crusade, and while the Pope had gained some authority over the military, this
was largely restricted to the protection of the papal office. However if one considers that it was
the princes, lords, and various leaders inspiredby Urbans plea who waged the war, competant
authority is met.
Probability of Success seems to not apply since under Augustine a Just War can be
considered Just regardless of success, and the First Crusade at least met the objective of retaking
Jerusalem. The last three principals ofJus ad bellum can be said not to have been met as they
-
7/30/2019 The First Crusade: Inciting Agents and Retrospective
18/22
16
regard peace as the point and objective of a war; due to the motivation of the Turks, these are
principles that could not have been met.
To examineJus in bello, the first consideration is Discrimination. Here it can be said that
only some armies were partially justified as acting in official capacity as soldiers; they all fail on
the principal that the clergy should not take up arms, and mercy and forebearance should be
shown to captives and non-combatants. Captives were rarely taken and non-combatants on their
own side were slaughtered.
Under proportionality, actions being limited to military necessity, there are several
factors where the Crusaders failed. One began with the indescriminate killing of Jews in Europe
before the campaign was even launched. Another is reports of cannibalism by the Crusaders at
Ma'arrat al-Numan. Lastly the indescriminate murder of Jews and Muslims in Jerusalem who
were promised safed passage if they surrendered, and having done so were killed anyway. Good
Faith fails for many of the same reasons stated previously, as promises to the enemy were not
kept.
In evaluating whether the Crusades measured up to their own standards, an interesting
dichotomy comes into play. They met nearly all principles ofJus ad bellum; the right to go to
war. However they failed every regard ofJus ad bello; the right to conduct war. One might say
that in the analysis the Crusaders had every right to engage in the First Crusade, but perhaps they
lacked the discipline to actually carry it out.
CONCLUSION
This First Crusade changed the course of history in the known world, for better and for
worst. Crusader States were established in Antioch, Edessa, Jerusalem, and Tripoli. Alexios
made the Crusading Lords swear fealty to him as they passed through Constantinople, bringing a
-
7/30/2019 The First Crusade: Inciting Agents and Retrospective
19/22
17
temporary alliance with the West and momentarily reuniting the Roman Catholic and Orthodox
churches. The returning Crusaders were seen as heroes, inspiring a mass of poetry and literature
on their deeds.
There were many negatives, at times so many criticisms that the Crusades become the
defining hallmark of a polemic against Christianity. The indulgances offered were never
particularly clear, and eventually led to Luthers Reformation which further divided the church.
In the end the Holy Land was never recovered, and the advance of Islam was never fully
stopped. The schism between the East and West while temporarily set aside, were eventually
only driven further apart by insolent popes. The primary objectives, while achieved in the First
Crusade, were in the end completely lost.
Many evils were committed during this time, for which many falsely claim were
committed in Gods name. Many considered the fight over an earthly city ignored the larger
Christian purpose of attaining the Heavenly Kingdom of God. Further the hatred between
Christians and Muslims, as well as the persecution of Jews were advanced to a near incurable
level. Ultimately the Crusades, particularly through Pope Urban II, changed the motives of war
in such a way that conquest of land was no longer the real, percieved motive. Instead wars of
personal conscience were now considered acceptable.24
Further, the justifications of the Crusades failed to meet their own standards. While the
Christians were warranted in engaging in warfare against the Muslim conquest, they were not
disciplined in a manner that would allow them to meet the requirements of carrying out such a
war. This is possibly the fault of the then living concept of Christendom, a theocratic society
led by imperfect humans using the justification of being led by God to govern their society.
24 Schaff, "Effects of the Crusades.," 232-235.
-
7/30/2019 The First Crusade: Inciting Agents and Retrospective
20/22
18
The Crusades are perhaps the ultimate evidence that such a government, absent the direct and
probably physical presence of Jesus Christ, will always result in failure.
-
7/30/2019 The First Crusade: Inciting Agents and Retrospective
21/22
19
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Appleby, R. Scott. "How the Pope Got His Political Muscle." U.S. Catholic 64, no. 9 (1999): 36.
Asbridge, Thomas S. The First Crusade : A New History. New York: Oxford University Press,
2004
Backman, Clifford R. The Worlds of Medieval Europe. New York: Oxford University Press,
2003
Bryce, Viscount James. The Holy Roman Empire. Kindle ed. Chicago, IL: Acheron Press, 1906.
Reprint, 2012
Butler, Richard. "Pope Bl. Urban Ii." The Catholic Encyclopedia Vol. 15 (1912).
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14257a.htm [accessed 8 Dec. 2012].
Charles William, Previt-Orton. The Shorter Cambridge Medieval History: In Two Volumes.Vol. 1. 2 vols. London, England: Cambridge University Press, 1955
Dana Carleton, Munro. "The Speech of Pope Urban Ii. At Clermont, 1095." The American
Historical Review 11, no. 2 (1906): 231-242.
Erdmann, Carl. The Origin of the Idea of Crusade. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press,1977
Howard, Jonathan. The Crusades: A History of One of the Most Epic Military Campaigns of All
Time. Kindle ed. North Charleston, SC: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform,
2012
Keen, Ralph. The Christian Tradition. Upper Saddle River (N.J.): Prentice Hall, 2004
Landes, Richard "Peace of God, Pax Dei."Berkshire Encyclopedia of Millenian Movements Vol.
(1999). http://www.mille.org/people/rlpages/paxdei.html [accessed 12/7/2012].
Mattox, John Mark. Saint Augustine and the Theory of Just WarContinuum Studies in
Philosophy: Continuum, 2006
O'Malley, John W.History of the Popes : From Peter to the Present. Adobe Digital ed.: Sheed &
Ward, 2010
Oman, Charles William Chadwick. The Byzantine Empire. 3rd. Kindle ed. London: Amazon
Digital Services, Inc. (G. P. Putnam's Sons), 1902. Reprint, Amazon Kindle
Paine, Mike. The Crusades. Harpenden: Pocket Essentials, 2005
-
7/30/2019 The First Crusade: Inciting Agents and Retrospective
22/22
20
Patterson, Gordon M.Medieval History: 500 to 1450 Ce. 112 vols. Piscataway, NJ: Research &
Education Assn, 1995
Schaff, Philip. "The Call to the Crusades." InHistory of the Christian Church Vol. V, MedivalChristianity : From Gregory I to Gregory Vii, A.D. 590-1073, edited by Tim Perrine, 5.
Grand Rapids, Mich: Eerdmans Publ. Co, 1997.
________. "Effects of the Crusades." InHistory of the Christian Church Vol. V, Medival
Christianity : From Gregory I to Gregory Vii, A.D. 590-1073, edited by Tim Perrine, 5.Grand Rapids, Mich: Eerdmans Publ. Co, 1997.
________. "The First Crusade and the Capture of Jerusalem." InHistory of the Christian Church
Vol. V, Medival Christianity : From Gregory I to Gregory Vii, A.D. 590-1073, edited by
Tim Perrine, 5. Grand Rapids, Mich: Eerdmans Publ. Co, 1997.
________. "The War over Investiture." InHistory of the Christian Church Vol. V, Medival
Christianity : From Gregory I to Gregory Vii, A.D. 590-1073, edited by Tim Perrine, 5.Grand Rapids, Mich: Eerdmans Publ. Co, 1997.
Ware, Timothy. The Orthodox Church. 2nd ed.: Penguin Adult, 1993
Wisconson, University of, "Thesis and Purpose Statements", University of Wisconson
http://writing.wisc.edu/Handbook/Thesis_or_Purpose.html (accessed 12/6/2012).