the evolution of the primate, hominid and human brain · pdf filehumanoids developed the...

Volume 4 • Issue 1 • 1000124J PrimatolISSN: 2167-6801 JPMT, an open access journal

Research Article Open Access

Cole, J Primatol 2015, 4:1http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2167-6801.1000124

Review Article Open Access

Primatology

The Evolution of the Primate, Hominid and Human BrainLaurence A Cole*

USA hCG Reference Service, Angel Fire, NM 87710, USA

*Corresponding author: Laurence A Cole, PhD, USA hCG Reference Service, P.O. Box 950, Angel Fire, NM 87710, USA, Tel: 575-377-1330; E-mail: [email protected]

Received January 24, 2015; Accepted February 25, 2015; Published March 05, 2015

Citation: Cole LA (2015) The Evolution of the Primate, Hominid and Human Brain. J Primatol 4: 124. doi:10.4172/2167-6801.1000124

Copyright: © 2015 Cole LA. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Keywords: hCG Hyperglycosylate; hCG Prosimian primate; Lower simian primate; Advanced simian primate; Early homind human

IntroductionA major questions arises in paleontology, anthropology and

archeology, how did primates, hominids and humans develop a large brain [1-4]? Most mammals and early primates had a small brain, approximately 0.1% of total weight. Brain growth was limited by epitheliochorial placentation and inefficient mechanisms for transporting nutrition from mother to fetus, nutrients had to pass through five tissues layers [1-4]. How was this surmounted to permit the expanding brain among primates, hominids and humans? This question is addressed in this review.

This introduction has the function of introducing all the ingredients involved in the chorionic gonadotropin (CG)/hyperglycosylated CG human evolution model, and for describing the sources of all data provided. The ingredients involved in this model are CG and hyperglycosylated hCG [5-8], and the brain growth genes and growth factors MCPH1, ASPM, CD5RAP2, CENPJ, WDR62, CEP152 and STIL genes [9-19].

Two independent molecules are a major part of the brain size explanation, chorionic gonadotropin (CG) and hyperglycosylated CG. The placenta in pregnancy comprises mononucleated cytotrophoblast cells. These fuse together to form multinucleated syncytiotrophoblast cells. Anywhere from 3 to 50 cytotrophoblast cells fuse to form syncytiotrophoblast cells with 3-50 nuclei. Cytotrophoblast cells are growing placental cells. Syncytiotrophoblast cell do not grow, they strictly arise from fusion of cytotrophoblast cells. Cytotrophoblast cells produce the hyperglycosylated autocrine hyperglycosylated CG and not any hCG. Fused syncytiotrophoblast cells while having the same genes as cytotrophoblast cells do not express the molecule N-acetylgucosaminyl transferase-VI the enzyme that branches or

hyperglycosylates the O-linked sugars on CG. It produces the un-hyperglycosylated hormone hCG [20].

The hormone CG and the autocrine hyperglycosylated CG function together in generating and managing hemochorial placentation [6,21-24]. Hemochorial placentation is a much more efficient mechanism of placentation than epitheliochorial placentation involving invasion potentially deep into the uterus. Hemochorial placentation involves generation of a tank of maternal blood, and passage of nutrients across a single layer of syncytiotrophoblast cells to enter the umbilical or fetal circulation [6,21].

Published studies show that hyperglycosylated CG is an autocrine acting as an antagonist on transforming growth factor-ß (TGFß) receptor [25,26]. hCG, in contrast, is a hormone acting on a joint luteinizing hormone (LH)/CG receptor. Hyperglycosylated CG functions to drive implantation of pregnancy. This is achieved by hyperglycosylated CG promoting growth of the blastocysts, and its invasion deep into the uterus [5,27]. Hyperglycosylated CG also drives placental tissue growth during pregnancy by promoting cytotrophoblast cell growth.

Brain growth promoting genes and the cded growth factors are very much involved in primate, hominid and human brain development [9,10]. Studies show that deficiencies and mutations in these brain size

AbstractHuman evolution involved four brain enhancement steps. The first step of brain size enhancement occurred

in lower simian primates (brain size 0.17%-0.19% of body weight). The second step occurred in advanced simian primates (brain size 0.66%-0.78% of body weight). The third step occurred among early hominids (brain size 1.0%-1.2% of body weight), and the fourth of final step occurred among humanoids (brain size 2.1%-2.7% of body weight). This brain enhancement occurred in response to brain growth genes or brain growth factor proteins. Brain growth was very much limited by the efficiency of fetal nutrition or placentation. In many respects it was the efficiency of placentation and implantation that controlled brain growth genes expanding brain growth to the limit that placentation could allow.

Brain growth was initially blocked by inefficiency of epitheliochorial placentation. It was the initial evolution of chorionic gonadotropin (CG) and hyperglycosylated CG that promoted the creation of hemochorial placentation, and the implantation of the placenta. This occurred in lower simian primates and so was followed by initial implantation and hemochorial placentation. This permitted the first step in brain growth. The CG gene underwent mutation with advanced simian primates and a higher biological activity CG and hyperglycosylated hCG resulted. This drove more efficient implantation and placentation and so primates developed a bigger brain, the second step in brain growth. The CG gene underwent further mutation with early hominids and a higher biological activity CG and hyperglycosylated hCG resulted. This drove even more efficient implantation and placentation and so early hominids developed a bigger brain, the third step in brain growth. The CG gene underwent mutation with humanoids and a higher biological activity CG and hyperglycosylated hCG resulted. This drove the most efficient implantation and placentation and so humanoids developed the biggest brain, the fourth step in brain growth.

http://dx.doi.org/10.472/2167-6801.1000124


of 8


promoting genes in the human fetus leads to microcephaly disorders in infants, with brains as small as 1.0% of body weight, vs. normal mean brain of 2.4% of body weight. Microcephaly leads to gross mental retardation and premature chromosomal condensation (PCC). A total of seven distinct brain growth genes have now been identified coding for brain growth factors. These are the MCPH1 gene also known as microcephalin gene [11-13], WDR62 gene [14], CDK5RAP2 gene [15], CEP152 gene [16], ASPM gene [17], CENPJ gene [15] and STIL gene

[18]. Small mutational differences have been noted in MCPH1, ASPM, CD5RAP2, CENPJ genes in early and advanced primates and humans, indicating gene and brain growth factor advancement with evolution [11,12,15,17].

MCPH1 was the first gene in which mutations were directly shown to cause microcephaly [11-13,19]. MCPH1 first evolved with lower simian primates that evolved 37 million years ago, some of the earliest minimally intelligent primates. Major differences have been observed in the MCPH1 in lower simian primates like the gibbon and cebus monkey, with advanced simian primates like orangutan and chimpanzee and with humans. It is proposed that during primate and human evolution the divergence in MCPH1 due to mutations led to functional modifications. That these modifications are the molecular mechanisms of how MCPH1 contributed to brain enlargement in primates and greater enlargement in human evolution [11,17]. Seemingly MCPH1 and other brain growth genes played a major role in the evolutionary enlargement of the brain.

Mutiple sources of data are provided here. Multiple brain size information is presented and discussed, this is data published by [2,4,28-30]. Information on primate and hominid CG isoelectric point (pI) was provided by [2,4,28]. Data on human CG circulating blood half-life was provided by [31]. The circulating blood half-life (C½L) of lower simian primate CG, and advanced simian primate CG was estimated using the following equation C½L = (1/pI × 12)4 established for CG and luteinizing hormone (LH).

The Evolution of CG and Hyperglycosylated CG The molecules CG and hyperglycosylated CG first appeared

in lower simian primates. These molecules directly evolved from deletion mutation in LH ß-subunit gene (Figure 1). LH ß-subunit evolved from Gonadotropin Ancestral Hormone-II (GAH-II), found today in some fish. GAH-II evolved from the ancestral α-subunit, a α-subunit- α-subunit dimer. This directly evolved from TGFß (Figure 1) [32-35]. Hyperglycosylated CG is the first of this group of TGFß evolutionary descendent to express common TGFß sequences and to be an antagonist of the TGFß receptor [25,26].

It is interesting that LH was a single gonadotropin molecule. That the new molecules CG and hyperglycosylated CG evolved from LH by deletion mutation. That the CG/hyperglycosylated hCG single gene is expressed by cytotrophoblast cells and fused syncytiotrophoblast cells to make two independent molecules hyperglycosylated CG and CG vary just in carbohydrate structure, CG binding a joint LH/CG hormone receptor and hyperglycosylated CG antagonizing an ancestral TGFß receptor [25,26].

The lower simian primate CG and hyperglycosylated hCG had three N-linked oligosaccharides and two O-linked oligosaccharides. With mutations in the C-terminal peptide of the ß-subunit of CG and hyperglycosylated CG additional Ser amino acids appeared. In advanced simian primates the molecules had three O-linked oligosaccharides.

With further mutations leading to further Ser amino acids the hominid molecules had four O-linked oligosaccharides. Finally, with further mutation in the core of hCG ß-subunit leading to addition Asn amino acid residues an additional N-linked oligosaccharide was added to the human molecules. The human molecule has 4 N-linked and 4 O-linked oligosaccharides [7-8,36].

Each oligosaccharides terminated with sialic acid sugar residues, making the molecules more acidic [20,36]. The acidity of lower simian CG was isoelectric point (pI)=6.3 (Table 1). The acidity of the advanced simian molecules was pI=4.9. The acidity of the hominid molecule is unknown since blood is not available. Finally, the human molecule is pI=3.5. With increasing acidity the blood circulating half-life of molecules increased dramatically. It is estimated that the circulating half-life of lower simian primate molecules was 2.4 hours, the half-life of advanced simian primate molecules was estimated as 6.0 hours, the half-life of the hominid molecule is unknown while the half-life of the human molecule was 37 hours [4,7,8,28,31] (Table 1).

Figure 1: The evolution of CG and hyperglycosylated CG.

Species Placentation

Implantation depth

% of uterine thickness

Brain size% of body

weight

CG pI (half-

life)

CG #

oligosaccharides

Prosimian Epitheliochorial 0% 0.07% NoneLower simian primate

Hemochorial 0.3% 0.17% 6.3 (2.4 hr) 5

Advanced simian primate

Hemochorial 10% 0.74% 4.9 (6.0 hr) 6

Early hominid 1.2%

Human Hemochorial 30% 2.4% 3.5 (37 hr) 8

Table 1: CG and hyperglycosylated CG and the evolution of the brain. Table summarizes published data [4,7,8,28]. Circulating half-live is factual in humans and estimated from pI values and an equation in primates. No blood samples available from early hominids, brain size from skull determinations.

http://dx.doi.org/10.472/2167-6801.1000124


of 8


The Brain Growth Factor EntanglementMCPH1, ASPM, CD5RAP2, CENPJ, WDR62, CEP152 and STIL

genes and their brain growth factor promoted brain growth among primates, hominids and humanoids [9-19]. Did they, however, manage brain growth and cause the enlargement in brain size among lower and advanced simian primates, hominids and humans?

In mammals brain enlargement was completely blocked by the nutritional inefficiency of non-invasive epitheliochorial placentation. In epitheliochorial placentation essential nutrients such as glucose, oxygen and amino acids had to cross five layers of maternal and placental tissue to reach the fetal circulation from the maternal circulation. This was the principal placentation mechanism in mammals which was too inefficient of a placentation mechanism to permit brain and nervous tissue expansion [1,37-39]. As such, mammal brain size was generally small approximately 0.1% of body weight.

As proposed, brain growth in mammals and primates is totally mediated by placentation, or the capabilities of placentation to permit brain growth by brain growth promoting gene to occur [1,37-40]. More recent opinions after examining placentation in primates and humans are that deeper placental invasion and implantation are necessary for greater brain growth to occur [29,30,37,38,41]. Apparently greater nutrient transfer was needed for brain growth, such as hemochorial placentation, and deeper implantation was needed to create a larger transfer surface [29,37,38]. As shown in Table 1, implantation depth in prosimian primates, lower simian primates, advanced simian primates and humans correlates with brain size, showing the importance of implantation depth for brain growth or activation of brain growth genes.

Looking at the final CG/hyperglycosylated CG human brain evolution model. Very early primates like prosimian primates were much limited by epitheliochorial placentation and only had tiny brains of 0.07% of body weight like most mammals. It was not until lower simian primates that CG and hyperglycosylated CG evolved (the hormone and autocrine that promote hemochorial placentation) that hemochorial placentation evolved, that primates first were able to develop a larger brain (0.17% of body mass) promoted by brain expansion genes. The autocrine hyperglycosylated CG has been shown to control implantation in humans [5,42,43]. In lower simian primates minimal implantation through the depth of the decidua, about 0.3% of total uterine thickness occurs.

Multiple evolution researchers have considered that brain growth as promoted by brain growth factors coded by brain growth genes is limited or controlled by efficiency of hemochorial placentation, which is limited by how well the placenta is implanted [29,30,37,38,41]. As such, whatever factor controls placentation and implantation of the placenta seemingly controls brain growth and brain size. It appears that onset of brain growth factors is seeming controlled by placentation and implantation of pregnancy [29,30,37,38,41].

CG and hyperglycosylated CG work together to construct hemochorial placentation or advanced placentation [6-8,21], furthermore, hyperglycosylated CG on its own controls implantation of pregnancy [5,42,43]. As such CG and hyperglycosylated CG effectively control when brain growth genes and brain growth factors can promote brain growth. Lower simian primates have the base CG and hyperglycosylated CG of pI 6.3 and a very short circulating half-life of 2.4 hours (Table 1). The brain size permitted by the efficiency of the resulting minimal implantation (0.3% of uterine thickness) and

minimal hemochorial placentation as limited by brain growth genes is 0.17% of body weight. Following a few mutations and the addition of further oligosaccharides on CG and hyperglycosylated CG (Table 1). CG and hyperglycosylated CG become more acidic in advanced simian primates, pI=4.9. This permits deeper implantation (to 10% of uterine thickness) and more efficient construction of hemochorial placentation. Brain growth genes limit brain size to 0.74% of body weight (Table 1). Following many more mutations to CG and hyperglycosylated CG and the addition of multiple more oligosaccharides (Table 1), CG and hyperglycosylated CG become much more acidic still with humans, pI 3.5. This permits much deeper implantation (to 30% of uterine thickness) and much more efficient in construction of hemochorial placentation. Brain growth genes limit brain size to 2.4% of body weight (Table 1). An in between situation between advanced simian primate and humans in the early hominid presentation with a brain size of 1.2% of body weight. This is the CG/hyperglycosylated CG human evolution model with CG and hyperglycosylated CG controlling brain size [7,8,32].

CG and Hyperglycosylated CG in LowerSimian primates

CG and hyperglycosylated CG first evolved in lower simian primates [4,28]. A deletion mutation occurred in the LH ß-subunit gene leading to the first CG and hyperglycosylated CG. As shown in (Figure 2), a deletion mutation occurred at CAA, codon responding to amino acid 114, on the LH ß-subunit gene. LH ß-subunit was 121 amino acids long. The consequences of the deletion mutation was formation of gene coding for CG ß-subunit 145 amino acids long (Figure 2) [4,28]. LH is normally expressed by pituitary gonadotrope

Figure 2: A deletion mutation in the LH ß-subunit gene.

http://dx.doi.org/10.472/2167-6801.1000124


of 8


cells. Hyperglycosylated CG was expressed by cytotrophoblast cells, and CG by fused syncytiotrophoblast cells.

One clear function of CG and hyperglycosylated CG is driving the formation and maintenance of hemochorial placentation [6-8,21]. Hyperglycosylated hCG promotes growth of villous cytotrophoblast cells [5,42,43]. hCG promotes fusion of cytotrophoblast cells to syncytiotrophoblast cell [44]. hCG promotes the growth of uterine arteries to form tank of maternal blood [22,45]. hCG also promotes formation of an umbilical circulation to link the villous placental tissues with the fetus [23,24]. These together initial primate hemochorial placentation is seen in lower simian primates.

The initial CG and hyperglycosylated CG formed in lower simian primates evolved from LH. LH is an alkaline molecule with limited 20 minutes circulating half-life. The CG and hyperglycosylated hCG made from LH in lower simian primates also had a limited circulating half-life of approximately 2.4 hours. The results were that hyperglycosylated CG did not invade the uterus deeply and only developed minimal villous cells. The resulting hemochorial placentation was very inefficient; barely much better that epitheliochorial placentation the system used by prosimian primates, lower simian primates ancestors. While the brain size in prosimian primates was 0.07% of body weight, a slightly enlarged brain, 0.17% of body weight was found in lower simian primates with the evolution of CG, hyperglycosylated CG, and hemochorial placentation.

Figure 3 illustrates the inefficient hemochorial placentation in lower simian primates. That it is not significantly implanted in the uterus (implanted to depth of decidua), and has minimal trophoblast villous cells (Figure 3). Figure 3 also illustrates the more efficient hemochorial placentation in advanced simian primates and humans.

Mutations in CG and Hyperglycosylated CG in Advanced Simian Primates, Hominids and Humans

With progressing evolution advanced simian primates evolved from lower simian primates. Further mutation occurred at the C-terminal peptide of hCG ß-subunit, leading to additional Ser residues. The 3 N-linked oligosaccharide 2 O-linked oligosaccharide structure of lower simian primates, pI=6.3, became 3 N-lined oligosaccharides and 3 O-linked oligosaccharide structure, more acidic, pI=4.9, in advanced simian primates. The increased acidity increased the circulating half-life from 2.4 hours to 6.0 hours. With this improvement hyperglycosylated hCG started invading the uterus deeper, from decidua width of 0.3% to 10% width of uterus (Table 1). Hyperglycosylated CG and CG promoted villous tissue growth greater. Hemochorial placentation in advanced simian primates is illustrated in (Figure 3). With these major advances in hemochorial placentation fetuses were produced with a significantly larger brain size, 0.74% of body weight (Table 1).

Evolution progressed to early hominids. Further mutations occurred in hCG ß-subunit C-terminal peptide, and now molecules with 3 N-linked oligosaccharides and 4 O-linked oligosaccharides evolved. These were significantly more acidic that the advanced simian primate molecule with a much longer circulating half-life. This led to much more efficient hemochorial placentation. While we cannot get blood from early hominids because they are all extinct and determine the precise pI and precise half-life, we do know that they had significantly larger brains, 1.2% of body weight, from skull sizes (Table 1).

Finally, evolution progressed even further to humans. Further mutations occurred in the core of the CG ß-subunit molecule, and

now molecules with 4 N-linked oligosaccharides and 4 O-linked oligosaccharides evolves. These were significantly more acidic, Pi=3.5, than the hominid molecules with very much longer circulating half-life, 37 hours half-life. This led to very much more efficient hemochorial placentation (Figure 3). Humans like homo erectus and homo neanderthalensis developed a much larger brain to match the more efficient hemochorial placentation, 2.4% of body weight (Table 1).

This is how advanced primates, early hominids and humans evolved, through the growing acidity of CG, longer circulating half-lives and advancing hemochorial placentation.

The CG/hyperglycosylated CG Evolution ModelThe complete CG/hyperglycosylated hCG evolution model is

shown in (Figure 4). As shown, advancing glycosylation, acidity and circulating half-life of CG and hyperglycosylated hCG controls advancing implantation and advancing hemochorial placentation which leads to brain growth gene expression and action leading to increasing brain growth. As a confirmation, shown in (Figure 5) is brain size among multiple primates hominids and humanoids. As shown, brain size total fits with the concept of 5 very clear brain growth groups, prosimian primates. Group 1 (Figure 5) is prosimian primates and the earliest primates, stem primate. These used inefficient

Figure 3: Hemochorial placentation in primates and humans.

http://dx.doi.org/10.472/2167-6801.1000124


of 8


Figure 4: The complete CG/hyperglycosylated CG evolution model.

Figure 5: Evolution of the primate, hominid and human brain. Percentage values are brain size, % of body weight.

http://dx.doi.org/10.472/2167-6801.1000124


of 8


epitheliochorial placentation. The brains size was 0.07%-0.08% of total body weight. Group 2 (Figure 5) is lower simian primates where hemochorial placentation and implantation was introduced with brains 0.17%-0.19% of total body weight. Group 3 (Figure 5) is advanced simian primates or intelligent great apes with hemochorial placentation, with brains of 0.66%-0.78% of total body weight. Group 4 (Figure 5) is early hominids, and a brain size of 1.0-1.2% of total body weight, Group 5 (Figure 5) is humanoids or advanced hominids with hemochorial placentation, and a brain size of 2.1-2.7% of body weight. These 5 groups very much coincide with the five groups shown in Figure 4 or the evolution model.

Also shown in Figure 5 are the five CG sugar structure classifications, no CG, CG 5 sugar side chains, CG 6 sugar structures, CG 7 sugar structures, CG 8 sugar structures. It is the sugar structure that make CG and hyperglycosylated hCG more and more acidic, and having longer and longer circulation half-life. How the proposed models fits in exactly with the five brain size groups and the five sugar side chain groups very much confirms the correctness and validity of the model.

There is one section of the model that is very much unconfirmed. This is the early hominid group, group 4. All that is available in this group is extinct skeletons. Without blood or urine or a source of CG and hyperglycosylated CG from early hominids we are unable to confirm the structures of CG and hyperglycosylated CG. It is assumed in Figures 4 and 5 that early hominid CG has seven oligosaccharides. This is very much assumed since it fits everything together but cannot be confirmed.

Looking at human evolution as a single entity, it appears that the human brain developed in four steps (Figures 4 and 5). From prosimian to lower simian primates, from lower simian primates to advanced simian primates, from advanced simian primates to early hominids and from early hominids to humanoids. Lower simian primates evolved 37 million years ago, so that the staged development of the large human brain took 37 million years. The development of the human brain took 37 million years driven by advancing mutation in the CG/hyperglycosylated CG molecule.

It is the evolution of CG and hyperglycosylated CG alone that led to the four clear steps in the development of the human brain and presented in the “CG/hyperglycosylated CG human evolution model” (Figure 4). Yes it is important that these primates’ brains were continuously promoted by seven brain growth genes and their coded proteins. But brain growth, however, was only permitted by the evolution of forever improving promoters of hemochorial placentation and implantation, CG and hyperglycosylated CG.

Considering Darwin’s evolution model, the human evolution model described here is somewhat strange. Normally, positive mutations, such as those which occurred with CG and hyperglycosylated CG might take on 100 or more functions. Positive mutation may cause a hardening of a beak or mouth leading to better eating, a strengthening of any one of 50 muscles leading to increased strength, and improvement in liver enzyme functions, an improvement in vocal functions, better wiggling of toes, and so on. Furthermore, most mutation do not lead to positive outcomes. Mutation may not happen at all. As such the odds of a mutation in the CG gene leading to increased CG biological activity may be very small, perhaps 1 in 1000 or 1 in 10,000 offspring. In the “CG/hyperglycosylated CG human evolution model”, it appears like four mutation in the CG gene leading to major improvement in brain size occurred in a row, prosimian primate -(1)- lower simian primate -(2)- advanced simian primate -(3)- early hominids -(4)-

humanoids. Four 1 in 1000 or 1 in 10,000 events occurring in a row appears like planned evolution rather than Darwinian evolution with remote odds of anywhere between 1 in a trillion and 1 in 10 quadrillion. This indicates that human brain development may have been planned rather than randomly evolved through Darwinian evolution. In this respect “the CG/hyperglycosylated CG human evolution model” could be suggestive of God’s involvement in planning human creation as indicated in the Bible.

Planning the evolution of humans required the many mutations needed to develop seven brain growth genes. It required the evolution of CG and hyperglycosylated CG to start implantation and hemochorial placentation. Finally it required the sequential evolution of an basic, advanced, more advanced and super advanced variant of CG and hyperglycosylated CG. Hundreds of species mutations were needed for a potential coordinated possible evolution plan.

Complications of CG EvolutionUnfortunately the story does not end with the evolution of humans.

Multiple complications have been found in humans as complexities of having a super-ultra-potent growth factors in their genome, CG and hyperglycosylated CG.

Research has shown that miscarriages and biochemical pregnancies are the source of 15% and 25% of pregnancy failures among pregnant women. Ongoing research shows that these are largely due to inefficient or improper implantation of pregnancy. As shown in (Figure 6), pregnancy failure is primarily due to deficient supply of hyperglycosylated CG during implantation of human pregnancies [42,43]. As shown, in normal term pregnancy 70 of 70 cases produce >40% hyperglycosylated CG (Figure 6). In contrast, 49 of 63 failing pregnancies produced <40% hyperglycosylated CG (Figure 6).

Research shows that cancers produce hyperglycosylated hCG and hyperglycosylated CG free ß-subunit [46,47]. That both act on a TGFß receptor to promote cancer cell invasion (production of metalloproteinases and collagenases), cancer cell growth and block cancer cell apoptosis. These variants of hyperglycosylated hCG drive most cancers. It appears that cancer cells steal this super-ultra-potent

Figure 6: Proportion hyperglycosylated CG on the day of implantation among 123 pregnancies.

http://dx.doi.org/10.472/2167-6801.1000124


of 8


growth factor from the human genome as part of carcinogenesis, and use it to drive malignancies. An antibody to hyperglycosylated hCGß is looking promising as a possible cancer cure [46-49].

All the research that has been completed has been limited to humans. It is possible that hyperglycosylated CG causes similar miscarriage and cancer limitations in lower simian primates and advanced simian primates. While hyperglycosylated CG is not so much of a super-ultra-potent growth factor in these primate species it may still cause problems.

References1. Martin RD (1981) Relative brain size and basal metabolic rate in terrestrial

vertebrates. h Nature 293: 57-60.

2. Crawford RJ, Tregear GW, Niall HD (1986) The nucleotide sequences of baboon chorionic gonadotropin beta-subunit genes have diverged from the human. Gene 46: 161-169.

3. Cunnane SC, Harbige LS, Crawford MA (1993) The importance of energy and nutrient supply in human brain evolution. Nutr Health 9: 219-235.

4. Maston GA, Ruvolo M (2002) Chorionic gonadotropin has a recent origin within primates and an evolutionary history of selection. Mol Biol Evol 19: 320-335.

5. Cole LA, Dai D, Butler SA, Leslie KK, Kohorn EI (2006) Gestational trophoblastic diseases: 1. Pathophysiology of hyperglycosylated hCG. Gynecol Oncol 102: 145-150.

6. Cole LA (2014) hCG and Hyperglycosylated hCG, Promoters of Villous Placenta and Hemochorial Placentation. In: Nicholson R (ed) Placenta: Functions, Development and Disease, Nova Publishers, New York, USA.

7. Cole LA, Khanlian SA, Kohorn EI (2008) Evolution of the human brain, chorionic gonadotropin and hemochorial implantation of the placenta: insights into origins of pregnancy failures, preeclampsia and choriocarcinoma. J Reprod Med 53: 549-557.

8. Cole LA (2009) hCG and hyperglycosylated hCG in the establishment and evolution of hemochorial placentation. J Reprod Immunol 82: 112-118.

9. Gilbert SL, Dobyns WB, Lahn BT (2005) Genetic links between brain development and brain evolution. Nat Rev Genet 6: 581-590.

10. Keverne EB, Martel FL, Nevison CM (1996) Primate brain evolution: genetic and functional considerations. Proc Biol Sci 263: 689-696.

11. Shi L, Li M, Lin Q, Qi X, Su B (2013) Functional divergence of the brain-size regulating gene MCPH1 during primate evolution and the origin of humans. BMC Biol 11: 62.

12. Wang YQ, Su B (2004) Molecular evolution of microcephalin, a gene determining human brain size. Hum Mol Genet 13: 1131-1137.

13. Jackson AP, Eastwood H, Bell SM, Adu J, Toomes C, et al. (2002) Identification of microcephalin, a protein implicated in determining the size of the human brain. Am J Hum Genet 71: 136-142.

14. Nicholas AK, Khurshid M, Désir J, Carvalho OP, Cox JJ, et al. (2010) WDR62 is associated with the spindle pole and is mutated in human microcephaly. Nat Genet 42: 1010-1014.

15. Bond J, Roberts E, Springell K, Lizarraga SB, Scott S, et al. (2005) A centrosomal mechanism involving CDK5RAP2 and CENPJ controls brain size. Nat Genet 37: 353-355.

16. Guernsey DL, Jiang H, Hussin J, Arnold M, Bouyakdan K, et al. (2010) Mutations in centrosomal protein CEP152 in primary microcephaly families linked to MCPH4. Am J Hum Genet 87: 40-51.

17. Kouprina N, Pavlicek A, Mochida GH, Solomon G, Gersch W, et al. (2004) Accelerated evolution of the ASPM gene controlling brain size begins prior to human brain expansion. PLoS Biol 2: E126.

18. Kumar A, Girimaji SC, Duvvari MR, Blanton SH (2009) Mutations in STIL, encoding a pericentriolar and centrosomal protein, cause primary microcephaly. Am J Hum Genet 84: 286-290.

19. Barton NH, Briggs DEG, Eisen JA, Goldstein DB, Patel NH, et al. (2007) Evolution, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, USA.

20. Cole LA (2015) hCG and Hyperglycosylated hCG Carbohydrate Structures Corrected. J Gycobiol, in press.

21. Cole LA (2010) Introduction to pregnancy implantation, villous formation, and hemochorial placentation. In: Cole LA, Elsevier, Burlington MA (eds) Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), (2nd Edn) Elsiever publications, USA.

22. Zygmunt M, Herr F, Keller-Schoenwetter S, Kunzi-Rapp K, Münstedt K, et al. (2002) Characterization of human chorionic gonadotropin as a novel angiogenic factor. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87: 5290-5296.

23. Rao CV, Li X, Toth P, Lei ZM (1995) Expression of epidermal growth factor, transforming growth factor-alpha, and their common receptor genes in human umbilical cords. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 80: 1012-1020.

24. Rao CV, Li X, Toth P, Lei ZM, Cook VD (1993) Novel expression of functional human chorionic gonadotropin/luteinizing hormone receptor gene in human umbilical cords. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 77: 1706-1714.

25. Butler SA, Ikram MS, Mathieu S, Iles RK (2000) The increase in bladder carcinoma cell population induced by the free beta subunit of human chorionic gonadotrophin is a result of an anti-apoptosis effect and not cell proliferation. Br J Cancer 82: 1553-1556.

26. Berndt S, Blacher S, Munuat C, Detilleux J, Evain-Brion D, et al. (2013) Hyperglycosylated human chorionic gonadotropin stimulates angiogenesis through TGF-ß receptor activation. J Fed Am Soc Exper Biol 27: 1309-1321.

27. Cole LA, Khanlian SA, Riley JM, Butler SA (2006) Hyperglycosylated hCG in gestational implantation and in choriocarcinoma and testicular germ cell malignancy tumorigenesis. J Reprod Med 51: 919-929.

28. Fiddes JC, Godman HM (1979) The cDNA of the ß-subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin suggests evolution of a gene by readthrough into the 3’ untranslated region. Nature 281: 351-356.

29. Capellini I, Venditti C, Barton RA (2011) Placentation and maternal investment in mammals. Am Nat 177: 86-98.

30. Barton RA, Capellini I (2011) Maternal investment, life histories, and the costs of brain growth in mammals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 6169-6174.

31. Cole LA (2010) Biological functions of hCG and hCG-related molecules. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 8: 102.

32. Cole LA (2014) The hCG Group: the Key Molecules in Human Evolution, Human Life, and Human Death. Curr Obstet Gynecol Reps 3: 91-101.

33. Sun PD, Davies DR (1995) The cystine-knot growth-factor superfamily. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 24: 269-291.

34. Hogan BL, Blessing M, Winnier GE, Suzuki N, Jones CM (1994) Growth factors in development: the role of TGF-beta related polypeptide signalling molecules in embryogenesis. Dev Suppl.

35. Isaacs NW (1995) Cystine knots. Curr Opin Struct Biol 5: 391-395.

36. Elliott MM, Kardana A, Lustbader JW, Cole LA (1997) Carbohydrate and peptide structure of the alpha- and beta-subunits of human chorionic gonadotropin from normal and aberrant pregnancy and choriocarcinoma. Endocrine 7: 15-32.

37. Elliot MG, Crespi BJ (2008) Placental invasiveness and brain-body allometry in eutherian mammals. J Evol Biol 21: 1763-1778.

38. Elliot MG, Crespi BJ (2009) Phylogenetic evidence for early hemochorial placentation in eutheria. Placenta 30: 949-967.

39. Luckett WP (1974) Comparative development and evolution of the placenta in primates. Contrib Primatol 3: 142-234.

40. Martin RD (2008) Evolution of placentation in primates: Implications of mammalian phylogeny. Evolutionary Biol 35: 125-145.

41. Carter AM, Pijnenborg R (2011) Evolution of invasive placentation with special reference to non-human primates. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 25: 249-257.

42. Cole LA (2012) Hyperglycosylated hCG and pregnancy failures. J Reprod Immunol 93: 119-122.

43. Sasaki Y, Ladner DG, Cole LA (2008) Hyperglycosylated human chorionic gonadotropin and the source of pregnancy failures. Fertil Steril 89: 1781-1786.

44. Shi QJ, Lei ZM, Rao CV, Lin J (1993) Novel role of human chorionic gonadotropin in differentiation of human cytotrophoblasts. Endocrinology 132: 1387-1395.

45. Toth P, Li X, Rao CV, Lincoln SR, Sanfilippo JS, et al. (1994) Expression of

http://dx.doi.org/10.472/2167-6801.1000124

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7266659



































































http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs13669-013-0066-3

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs13669-013-0066-3
















http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11692-008-9016-9

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11692-008-9016-9













of 8


functional human chorionic gonadotropin/human luteinizing hormone receptor gene in human uterine arteries. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 79: 307-315.

46. Cole LA, Butler S (2012) Hyperglycosylated hCG, hCGÎ² and Hyperglycosylated hCGÎ²: interchangeable cancer promoters. Mol Cell Endocrinol 349: 232-238.

47. Cole LA, Butler SA (2015) B152 Anti-Hyperglycosylated hCG free ß-Subunit A New Possible Treatment For Cancer. J Reprod Med, in press.

48. Iles RK (2007) Ectopic hCGbeta expression by epithelial cancer: malignant behaviour, metastasis and inhibition of tumor cell apoptosis. Mol Cell Endocrinol 260-262: 264-70.

49. Lunardi-Iskandar Y, Bryant JL, Zeman RA, Lam VK, Samaniego F, et al. (1995) Besnier Tumorigenesis and metastasis of neoplastic Karposi’s sarcoma cell line in immunodeficient mice blocked by a human pregnancy hormone. Nature 375: 64-68.


Submit your next manuscript and get advantages of OMICS Group submissionsUnique features:

• Userfriendly/feasiblewebsite-translationofyourpaperto50world’sleadinglanguages• AudioVersionofpublishedpaper• Digitalarticlestoshareandexplore

Special features:

• 400OpenAccessJournals• 30,000editorialteam• 21daysrapidreviewprocess• Qualityandquickeditorial,reviewandpublicationprocessing• IndexingatPubMed(partial),Scopus,EBSCO,IndexCopernicusandGoogleScholaretc• SharingOption:SocialNetworkingEnabled• Authors,ReviewersandEditorsrewardedwithonlineScientificCredits• Betterdiscountforyoursubsequentarticles

Submityourmanuscriptat:http://omicsgroup.info/editorialtracking/primatology

http://dx.doi.org/10.472/2167-6801.1000124












http://dx.doi.org/10.472/2167-6801.1000124

the evolution of the primate, hominid and human brain · pdf filehumanoids developed the...

Documents