the evolution of smbh from hard x-ray surveys
DESCRIPTION
The evolution of SMBH from Hard X-ray surveys. The XRB as a tracer of SMBH mass density Hard X-ray surveys: observational results Near-IR observations of hard X-ray sources Evidences of merging Conclusions and perspectives. Andrea Comastri (INAF – Osservatorio di Bologna – Italy). - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: The evolution of SMBH from Hard X-ray surveys](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/568152dd550346895dc0fab0/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The evolution of SMBH from Hard X-ray surveys
Andrea Comastri (INAF – Osservatorio di Bologna – Italy)
•The XRB as a tracer of SMBH mass density•Hard X-ray surveys: observational results•Near-IR observations of hard X-ray sources•Evidences of merging•Conclusions and perspectives
![Page 2: The evolution of SMBH from Hard X-ray surveys](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/568152dd550346895dc0fab0/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Hard X-ray Surveys
Most direct probe of the super-massive black hole (SMBH) accretion activity recorded in the XRB spectral energy density
Chandra and XMM surveys: SMBH census is almost complete (integral) obscured AGN make the bulk of the XRB
The light-up and evolution of obscured accreting SMBH is still largely unknown
(differential) XLF evolution of obscured AGN
![Page 3: The evolution of SMBH from Hard X-ray surveys](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/568152dd550346895dc0fab0/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
The deepest X-ray sky
HDFN (Brandt et al. 2001) CDFS (Giacconi et al. 2002)
Chandra Surveys, 1 Ms exposures
![Page 4: The evolution of SMBH from Hard X-ray surveys](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/568152dd550346895dc0fab0/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
The origin of the cosmic XRBA truly diffuse component not exceeding 10% of
the observed flux (warm IGM, missing baryons …) may still be present in the soft (below 2 keV) X-ray band
the hard XRB (2-100 keV) is due to single sources (X-ray surveys, CMB argument)
OBSCUREDAGN
![Page 5: The evolution of SMBH from Hard X-ray surveys](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/568152dd550346895dc0fab0/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
![Page 6: The evolution of SMBH from Hard X-ray surveys](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/568152dd550346895dc0fab0/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
SMBH mass density from XRB (Fabian & Iwasawa 1999)
![Page 7: The evolution of SMBH from Hard X-ray surveys](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/568152dd550346895dc0fab0/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
![Page 8: The evolution of SMBH from Hard X-ray surveys](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/568152dd550346895dc0fab0/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Where all the SMBH have gone ? N(L), N(z), efficiency, bolometric correction ?
![Page 9: The evolution of SMBH from Hard X-ray surveys](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/568152dd550346895dc0fab0/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
DEEP FIELDS: Redshift Distributions
•CDFS, Gilli 2003•CDFN, Barger et al. 2002
![Page 10: The evolution of SMBH from Hard X-ray surveys](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/568152dd550346895dc0fab0/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Cosmic Sheets
Z=0.67
•CDFS •CDFN
![Page 11: The evolution of SMBH from Hard X-ray surveys](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/568152dd550346895dc0fab0/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
X-ray source clusteringYang et al. 2003 (astro-ph/0302137)
•Hard X-raysources more clustered thansoft ones
![Page 12: The evolution of SMBH from Hard X-ray surveys](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/568152dd550346895dc0fab0/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
•Gilli et al. 2003 (astro-ph/0304177)
The same LSS is traced by both X-ray and near IRsurveys
![Page 13: The evolution of SMBH from Hard X-ray surveys](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/568152dd550346895dc0fab0/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Luminosity function:
•Cowie et al. 2003astro-ph/0301231
•Hasinger 2003astro-ph/0302574
![Page 14: The evolution of SMBH from Hard X-ray surveys](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/568152dd550346895dc0fab0/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Space density:
•Cowie et al. 2003: rho_BH ~ 2x105
•Hasinger 2003
![Page 15: The evolution of SMBH from Hard X-ray surveys](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/568152dd550346895dc0fab0/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Deep Chandra surveys: limits
Small solid angle lack of high z high L objects
Soft X-ray response biased against highly obscured objects
Limited by faint optical counterparts and thus incomplete at high-z
![Page 16: The evolution of SMBH from Hard X-ray surveys](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/568152dd550346895dc0fab0/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
The Hellas2XMM survey Wide and shallow: 3 deg2 (15 XMM public fields)
~30 sources/field, Fx>10-14
Bulk of the XRB Rare and peculiar sources, avoid cosmic variance
Relatively “easy” multi-wavelength follow-up (ESO-VLT,3.6m, ATCA, VLA, TNG & Chandra)
![Page 17: The evolution of SMBH from Hard X-ray surveys](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/568152dd550346895dc0fab0/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
X/O--------fX/fopt > 10Likely to be highly obscured
Undetected in the R-band at R=24-25 (shallow), even R>27-28 (deep)
Constant fractionover a large rangeof fluxes
Shallow surveys pick-up brightest sources optical identification is possible
![Page 18: The evolution of SMBH from Hard X-ray surveys](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/568152dd550346895dc0fab0/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Redshift from X-ray linesin the CDFN - R ~ 24 z= 1.15+-0.05
![Page 19: The evolution of SMBH from Hard X-ray surveys](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/568152dd550346895dc0fab0/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
317 sources (Hellas2XMM + Lockman + CDFN + SSA13 -15 < logFx < -13.3 , 70% identified) Fiore et al. 2003
![Page 20: The evolution of SMBH from Hard X-ray surveys](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/568152dd550346895dc0fab0/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Redshift distribution (Opt +stat. ids)
![Page 21: The evolution of SMBH from Hard X-ray surveys](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/568152dd550346895dc0fab0/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
The evolution of number and luminosity densities (Fiore et al. 2003)
• rho_BH ~ 4-6x105
![Page 22: The evolution of SMBH from Hard X-ray surveys](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/568152dd550346895dc0fab0/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
K-band observationsof high X/0
Selection:•11 sources •R > 24.5•Flx(2-10) > 1.2 10-14
•VLT/ISAAC•1 hour exp. in K•Seeing < 0.7 arcsec•Mag lim. ≈ 21
![Page 23: The evolution of SMBH from Hard X-ray surveys](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/568152dd550346895dc0fab0/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
ISAAC VLT K-band observations of high X/O
10/11 sources with a bright IR counterpart in the error box: ALL with R-
K>5
—————————
Extremely red colors
up to R-K~7 !up to R-K~7 !
—————————
Extended morphologies
Only two objects are
compact (high z AGN ?)
(Mignoli et al, in prep.)
Pointlike, K=17.7, R-K>6.8Elliptical, K=17.9, R-K=6.5Cluster CD ?, K=18.7, R-K=6.0Disky, K=18.4, R-K=5.8
![Page 24: The evolution of SMBH from Hard X-ray surveys](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/568152dd550346895dc0fab0/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
High quality imaging
Surface brightness
and effective radius
BH mass estimate
via FP and M(BH) vs. sigma
relation•Red=de Vaucouleurs
•Blue=exponential
NEED z
![Page 25: The evolution of SMBH from Hard X-ray surveys](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/568152dd550346895dc0fab0/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
The X/O ratio is correlated with the R-K color:
hope to get spectroscopic redshifts in the infrared
![Page 26: The evolution of SMBH from Hard X-ray surveys](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/568152dd550346895dc0fab0/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Evidences of interacting SMBH
![Page 27: The evolution of SMBH from Hard X-ray surveys](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/568152dd550346895dc0fab0/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Near IR imaging of hard X-ray sources:X-ray bright optically normal galaxies
![Page 28: The evolution of SMBH from Hard X-ray surveys](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/568152dd550346895dc0fab0/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Concluding Remarks The XRB appears to be dominated
by low-z low-L objectsThe SMBH mass density is almost
equally accounted for by unobscured and obscured AGN (lower mass on average)
Obscured AGN are hosted by a wide variety of galaxy types
Redshifts for optically faint (high X/O) obscured sources urgently needed
![Page 29: The evolution of SMBH from Hard X-ray surveys](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/568152dd550346895dc0fab0/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Broad Iron Lines at high z ?
![Page 30: The evolution of SMBH from Hard X-ray surveys](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062519/568152dd550346895dc0fab0/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Comastri, Civano & Brusa (in prep.)