the evolution of cooperation

46
The evolution of cooperation

Upload: sanne

Post on 20-Jan-2016

25 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

The evolution of cooperation. Altruism and the selfish gene. Altruism: benefit b to recipient at cost -c to the donor. Altruism and the selfish gene. Altruism: benefit b to recipient at cost -c to the donor `get the altruism out of altruism...´ (Trivers). Altruism and the selfish gene. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: The evolution of cooperation

The evolution of cooperation

Page 2: The evolution of cooperation

Altruism and the selfish gene

Altruism: benefit b to recipient at cost -c to the donor

Page 3: The evolution of cooperation

Altruism and the selfish gene

Altruism: benefit b to recipient at cost -c to the donor

`get the altruism out of altruism...´ (Trivers)

Page 4: The evolution of cooperation

Altruism and the selfish gene

Altruism: benefit b to recipient at cost -c to the donor

`get the altruism out of altruism...´ (Trivers)

kin selection Hamilton´s rule: c< b.r

Page 5: The evolution of cooperation

Altruism and the selfish gene

Altruism: benefit b to recipient at cost -c to the donor

`get the altruism out of altruism...´ (Trivers)

kin selection Hamilton´s rule: c< b.r in humans co-operation among non-relatives

Page 6: The evolution of cooperation

Darwin:

The small strength and speed of man, his want of natural weapons, etc., are more than counterbalanced ... by his social qualities, which led him to give and receive aid from his fellow men.

Page 7: The evolution of cooperation

Cooperation among non-relatives

Direct reciprocation and the Prisoner´s Dilemma

Indirect reciprocation Public Goods

Page 8: The evolution of cooperation

Consequently, theories of evolution which, in accordance with the philosophies inspiring them, consider the mind as emerging from the forces of living matter, or as a mere epiphenomenon of this matter, are incompatible with the truth about man. Nor are they able to ground the dignity of the person.

Page 9: The evolution of cooperation
Page 10: The evolution of cooperation

Reciprocity

Reciprocal altruism...the trading of altruistic acts in which benefit is larger than cost, so that over a period of time both parties enjoy a net gain.

(Trivers)

Page 11: The evolution of cooperation

The Prisoner´s Dilemma game

To cooperate or to defect

(example: cooperate means to give a gift of value b at cost -c)

Page 12: The evolution of cooperation

Prisoner´s Dilemma

015defectsJohnny

5-10cooperatesJohnny

defects cooperates

Oskar Oskar

Page 13: The evolution of cooperation

Prisoner´s Dilemma

Chicken) (like Game Snowdrift if

Dilemma sPrisoner' also if

and

Sucker ,Punishment ,Temptation Reward,

matrix Payoff

defect) and (cooperate D and C Strategies

PS

SPRTSP

RTPR

SPTR

PT

SR

Page 14: The evolution of cooperation

The iterated Prisoner´s Dilemma

probability w for another round

(for instance, toss a coin, stop game if 6)

shadow of the future (Axelrod)

Page 15: The evolution of cooperation

The iterated Prisoner´s Dilemma

015defect always

5-60TatFor Tit

defect alwaysTatFor Tit

Page 16: The evolution of cooperation

The iterated Prisoner´s Dilemma

)( if Bistable

11AllD

11TatFor Tit

AllDTatFor Tit

b

c

PT

RTw

w

P

w

PwT

w

PwS

w

R

Page 17: The evolution of cooperation

The iterated Prisoner´s Dilemma

errors! assume

TatFor Tit is (1,0)

AllD is (0,0)

D splayer'-coafter Cplay toprob q

C splayer'-coafter Cplay prob.to

strategies),(

p

qp

Page 18: The evolution of cooperation

The iterated Prisoner´s Dilemma

Page 19: The evolution of cooperation

The iterated Prisoner´s Dilemma

Page 20: The evolution of cooperation

The iterated Prisoner´s Dilemma

Page 21: The evolution of cooperation

The iterated Prisoner´s Dilemma

Page 22: The evolution of cooperation

The iterated Prisoner´s Dilemma

Page 23: The evolution of cooperation

The iterated Prisoner´s Dilemma

Page 24: The evolution of cooperation
Page 25: The evolution of cooperation

The iterated Prisoner´s Dilemma

Generous Tit For Tat p close to 1 q sizeable two zones

Page 26: The evolution of cooperation

The iterated Prisoner´s Dilemma

Bully is (0,0,0,1)

Fairbut Firm is (1,0,1,1)

TFT is (1,0,1,0)

AllD is (0,0,0,0)

AllC is )1,1,1,1(

outcomeafter Cplay toprob where

),,,(

strategies onememory

op

pppp

o

PTSR

Page 27: The evolution of cooperation

The iterated Prisoner´s Dilemma

Page 28: The evolution of cooperation

The iterated Prisoner´s Dilemma

Heteroclinic network A = Tit or Tat B = Firm But Fair C = Bully D = AllD

Page 29: The evolution of cooperation

The iterated Prisoner´s Dilemma

Page 30: The evolution of cooperation

The iterated Prisoner´s Dilemma

Page 31: The evolution of cooperation

Pavlov

Cooperate if other player used same move as yourself in previous round

reinforcement principle: repeat former move after high payoff

Pavlov is error-correcting Pavlov is stable Pavlov cannot invade population of defectors

Page 32: The evolution of cooperation

Pavlov

:shift-lose stay,-win

move same usedplayer -co iff cooperates

Pavlov ),,,()1,0,0,1(

CDDC

PTSRD

D

C

D

D

C

C

C

pppp PSR T

Page 33: The evolution of cooperation

Pavlov

... C D C D C C ... C C C

... D C D C D C ... C C C

TFTagainst TFT If

C C D C C...C C C

C C D D C...C C C

Pavlovagainst Pavlov If

correcting-error is Pavlov

Page 34: The evolution of cooperation

Pavlov

AllD invadecannot Pavlov

)2

(i.e. 2 if stable Pavlov

2 gets

2 roundper payoff

D... DD D D D D

... C D C D C D C

AllDagainst

simpleton'' a is Pavlov

bcRPT

PTAllD

SP

Page 35: The evolution of cooperation

Pavlov

Simple learning rule

stable, error-correcting

but needs retaliator to prepare the ground

Page 36: The evolution of cooperation

Indirect reciprocity

few rounds, as donor or receiver never with the same partner twice

Page 37: The evolution of cooperation

Indirect reciprocity

R. Alexander: Indirect reciprocity .. involves reputation

and status, and results in everyone in the group continually being assessed and reassessed.

Page 38: The evolution of cooperation

Indirect reciprocity

R. Alexander: Indirect reciprocity .. involves reputation and

status, and results in everyone in the group continually being assessed and reassessed.

Cooperation channelled towards cooperative members

Page 39: The evolution of cooperation

Indirect reciprocity

score: increases by 1 if help is given, decreases by 1 if help is withheld

score 0 at birth

Page 40: The evolution of cooperation

Indirect reciprocity

score: increases by 1 if help is given, decreases by 1 if help is withheld

score 0 at birth

strategy k: give only if recipient has score at least k

k>5: always defect k<-5: always help

Page 41: The evolution of cooperation

Indirect reciprocity

Page 42: The evolution of cooperation

Indirect reciprocity

Page 43: The evolution of cooperation

Indirect reciprocity

cooperation based on discrimination but not stable (can occasionally break

down)

Page 44: The evolution of cooperation

Indirect reciprocity

Page 45: The evolution of cooperation

Indirect Reciprocity

Page 46: The evolution of cooperation

William D. Hamilton

The theory of many-person games may seem to stand to that of two-person games in the relation of sea-sickness to a head-ache!